Seen #3 before and people actually thought it's a good thing that they stood their ground. After all, "what would the other person learn if they didnt?" well the cammer probably took 50% (or more) of the blame through insurance... so congratulations, you really taught those guys a lesson rather than just letting them in and cracking on with your day.
My comment was "its pretty obvious the White Van is going to try and push in, whilst I don't agree with that behaviour, its easier to just let them get in front of you and call it. Otherwise... you are just as liable for not preventing an accident as much as the other driver is for causing it".
I'd have bounced the police straight into court, dashcam is legal evidence and accepted as such in a court of law. No wonder the police have no respect, that's because most of them are jobsworth Muppets
@@rampak1 Are you insinuating that they wouldn't because theyre doing food delivery? Maybe you've never applied to do this job but they ask for proof of insurance before even giving you the job and the insurance wouldn't matter regardless since its vehicle on vehicle, nothing to do with the food he is carrying.
@@TisAndrew obviously if the company checked that he had valid insurance then he was insured. However I don't understand your comment about it being immaterial. The law says that if you use a vehicle in connection with a trade or business, the vehicle needs specific insurance for that purpose. The only exception is driving directly between your home and a permanent place of business.
He should of, it was just an accident. He owned and apologised, admitted he was wrong and even was willing to provide him information to make a complaint against him.
That's the trouble with the social media community! If the mistake had been his he would have apologized, expected it to have been accepted and went on his way. Oh no, why would he do that? Might not get enough likes - clown!!!
Driver courtesy, common sense and reasonableness is are thing of the past, i'm afraid. it's more common for drivers to cause animosity, confrontation and anger rather than show calm good sense.
@@fpser4888 I've driven HGVs for 33 years, I know that it takes time to get going. He correctly waited after the first lot came past, to wait for the car approaching at some speed, but after that one, he could (and should) have gone.
Ye at the point he should go he just sits there. The police car/ambulance puts their signal on super early. He missed his chance to go.. Plus he had right of way since they was turning right but he was giving way to them. Poor driving.
@@dwhhhhhhhhhh Definitely. The police officer WAS technically at fault as he lingered a second too long on checking his right as he left the corner, but the cyclist was masked by the parked car. It was all at low speed and wouldn't have been a serious accident. The cyclist made it sound like he'd uncovered widespread corruption in South Yorkshire Police.
Many of these videos do show terrible and/or intolerant driving. However, anyone can make a mistake, and in some clips that is what has happened. In a long life of driving I have had a number of narrow escapes. Some were my fault, some were someone else's fault. When it's been my fault I try to learn from it and avoid the same mistake again, that's how life is.
#3 Of course. Teaching a lesson by sounding the horn till it die and not slowing down only ended up in a heavy repair bill and an absolute mess. Sometimes we should know how to let things go maturely and later deal with it. Also you had to stand on the mid curb, holding the broken piece looking like an idiot to the ingoing traffics.😅
Absolute rubbish. Not sure what he's driving but I certainly wouldn't have taken a bus through. If he had then the last clip would be from one of the oncoming cars entitled 'look- nasty selfish lorry driver pulls out to pass car transporter and makes me stop '. He's going to need to pull right over the other side of the road (about 3-5 secs) then drive 80 feet (40 ft of transporter + 40 ft for his own vehicle at least) on the wrong side to clear the stationery transporter. Say he does this 'recklessly' at 10 mph, (10 mph = 15 ft/sec) thus 80 ft = 5.5 sec, then 3 -5 secs to straighten back onto left hand side of road. Total time required not to inconvenience oncoming traffic = 11.5 - 15 secs. Now see how many car come within 80' of the back of the transporter within 15 secs. Note his minute frustration when one of the cars turns left without a signal, as this advanced notice would have given him the space he needed. The wait is justified. if you don't agree, then either you're a car driver or could be considered to be driving a truck on your weight. PS same argument at #58, absolutely no chance of getting through without obstructing oncoming traffic.
I hope that car driver downloaded the footage, handed it into a senior officer at the nearest police station along with a written complaint against the officers involved. The next stage if not satisfied is a formal complaint to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (formerly the Police Complaints Commission).
just refuse the warning, and if the copper says owt, state that they are perverting the course of justice and it will be reported to their senior officer AND IOPC. They are not acting with respect to their sworn aoth/attestation, the aren't applying the law just summary kangeroo BS, thus they no longer have authority over you in any case. Just tell them to go away and drive off.
Crown Prosecution rules state officers have the duty to collate evidence when presented. So not being interested in watching the video footage, which would directly prove innocence or guilt, just means they failed in their duty.
@@MiningForPies yes you do, plod have sworn an oath and to uphold law. them not looking at the evidence which was an actual fact of the events - which was offered and declined, and not upholding their oaths regards fairness and favour, makes that a perversion of justice, they meted out summary judgement and punishment without the facts and based on their 'feeling' at best but when they were offered facts and declined it then that's them perverting justice
I quite agree, there’s a lot like this. As a car driver, motorcyclist and cyclist, I’ve learnt that discretion is the better part of valour. I think some folk with cameras are delighted when they clock someone doing something silly. I wonder if they’re perfect drivers ?
@@user-rf9me7xm1w I very much doubt they are. I have car, motorcycle and HGV licences so have experienced the roads from all points of view. My conclusion is that every form of vehicle has good and bad drivers and that the vast majority of 'minor' incidents could have been avoided by drivers looking further ahead and just giving way to impatience rather than trying to get their bo**ocks out!
#6. I think i've said it when it was originally posted, but again: I hope the driver of the car went to the police station with his footage. And asked them why the colleges didn't want to see it.
If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence. Covering someone with screen wash might be an infringement of the road traffic act.
@@mikeheasman2594 I think having 'Deliveroo' on the back of your motorbike or bicycle implies that you will infringe the Road Traffic Act in some way or another within the next 50 yds. QED
the only thing I can think of is that he's moaning at the black car in front for not letting the van out and "closing the gap unnecessarily" but it's really nothing.
Good stuff here ! I'm a (bloody) Yank who enjoys seeing how other places have as many bad drivers as we do . Plus, your road rules are *slightly* different so I learn by watching . -Nate
haha, i love to watch the US dash cams and its good to see its not just the UK:P I specially like to watch how you guys are coping with roundabouts over there!
@@peterroberts7921 I encountered rotaries when on holiday driving around Massachusetts. I was gratified to note Americans don't have a clue how to drive round them either!
So glad I'm fortunate enough to have retired after 40years of driving and not one accident. Even drove a London double decker for 12 years and no incidents. First thing I did after retiring was to sell my car. So much stress driving in the 21st century with the amount of idiots out there. Thanks for the great video.
I'm never driving so I don't have to deal with or god forbid BECOME one of these morons, bloody love the bus services. Thanks for doing one of the most stressful jobs in transport mate, you bus lads don't get thanked half as often as you should
Come to Australia. We don't have the paralysing traffic situations that you folk have to put up with. I have English pals here who go home to see family occasionally, and they can't wait to get back here, largely owing to the traffic and the idiots on UK roads.
#3 instead of just being annoyed and letting the van in, you’ve ended up with a damaged car, a damaged ego and a large repair bill. By the way “sounding your horn” will not alter your physical reality - you can still be hit with it running you know.
First video, the dash cam driver new what was going to happen and still drove on up ahead without due attention. i love how these dash cam owners always think they're right
For #3, pride has to take a back seat even if you are in the right else you end up with a collision like this if neither of you backs down, and in 90% of these situations I've been in, the driver trying to dodge ahead of you won't back down.
9:02 There is no clue as to what happened, whether the winch cable snapped or the hook wasn't secure, but you can't help feeling sorry for the operator who will suffer nightmares for months to come. I hope that any damage was not too serious and more important, no-one was hurt. 10:17 Basic driving technique observations include keep you head moving, right,left,right left all the way through a junction like this! It is a moot point whether this incident could have been avoided because the cyclist obviously was not caring for his own safety and rode straight off the pavement into a road, looking again at the dash cam footage, there is no evidence that the cyclist made any observations whatsoever.. Cyclist should have number plates on their bikes and carry insurance. 11:17 another prime example of the one and one makes two theory. A driver intends to move to the right hand lane approaching a junction. (should have moved over earlier the idiot (probably seeing the right indicator assumes the other is turning into the junction and, just to prove he is an idiot pulls out in front of the other vehicle, the driver of the "victim" car then decides he is going to carve up the idiot and cut across in front of his just to prove one idiot plus one idiot makes two idiots. 11:58 A zebra crossing with a central island is two separate crossings (see Rule 20 Highway Code) so it would appear that the white car driver did not commit an offence. However, Pelican crossings which go straight across the road are one crossing, even when there is a central island. You MUST wait for pedestrians who are crossing from the other side of the island. So the white car driver DID commit an offence. The use of the word 'must' in the Highway Code is not accidental! 12:09 1+1 = 2? 15:02 The DL 25 and its descendants have the category "Drive at a speed appropriate to road and traffic conditions and I have known candidates to fail for driving too slowly as we see here, the over cautious driver causes a frustrated driver to act the idiot and have a little game of brake check (please ... not break check!), thus putting other road users in danger; overtake when it is safe to do so otherwise, be patient and wait for an opportunity. Any driver, while they are driving are not the judge and jury, we are all only drivers. The Peugeot driver was lucky to get away with his attempt to gain retribution! 16:54 The most important initials at junctions, I use to drum into my pupils were L F I -- 'look for idiots' and the van driver failed to do so, he was lucky, he got away with a handshake, it could have been so easily "causing death by dangerous driving". 18:04 The two second rule seems to have disappeared from driving language, anyway, as this clip shows, two seconds is a woefully inadequate gap to leave on a fast road, 4 to 6 seconds should be a minimum depending upon weather. 20:22 I had a pupil who did a lovely "emergency" controlled stop when a policeman pulled his car out in front of us. To his credit, the policemen got out of his car and apologised to the pupil, and gave her a good piece of advice, "even experts make stupid mistakes, I apologise for mine". 22:09 As far as I could see, there were no "No Entry" signs at the beginning of the coned area denoting a one way road and even at the dash cam's entry point there were two "arrow" signs, one saying keep left of the cones and the other saying "take off from here and fly to the left" bad signage is the culprit here (as far as the clip takes the viewer) not the drivers apparently driving in the wrong direction. 22:03 I love the cyclist blaming everyone for wrecking his bike! 27:29 Obviously a perpetual learner driver biker. Why are companies like pizza purveyors allowed to employ learner drivers to deliver their goods -- and what is the situation with insurance companies when these learners cause a serious accident? 229:13 There is no such thing as a 'fast lane' on British roads all lanes on a carriageway are subject to the same speed limit. There is no such thing as 'undertaking' (which would defy the laws of physics) there is overtaking in the wrong lane, however if the traffic is going more slowly in a two lane road (which is essentially what one side of a dual carriageway is) then it is legal to overtake on the left in these circumstances. 29:47 Absolutely agree, however that driver should have been banned for deliberate dangerous driving. 30:51 A lady who's imagination needs to be exercised but not half so much as the imagination of the local authority who should have banned parking all the way down the approach to this roadworks -- and enforced it! 34:30 This time a cyclist without imagination! What was to stop him getting off his bike pushing it through the (the) adequate gap and continuing. The world does not belong to the 'lycra clad'! 36:39 The drivers passed (verb) their tests, when they received their full licence, they were past (adverb) their test . 45:36 Great slogan on the back of the van : "Solutions for living" not where its driver is concerned. However, what would have been wrong if the "cammer" had simply taken his foot off the gas for a few seconds and avoided a near collision? 48:28 That motorcycle 'falling over' was a blatant insurance scam. 49:55 Perhaps if the cammer had not deliberately closed the gap on the idiot 1 idiot + 1 idiot would not have made two idiots. 50:21 There were at least three occasions when, depending on the size of the vehicle this driver could have passed the car carrier with complete safety. It is correct to give way when the obstruction is on your side, but there is no law that says you have to wait until the driver of the obstruction finishes whatever he is doing before you can go.
I literally just crashed my work van on the way home from work so I’m watching these to make me feel better about it lol. Wasn’t a bad crash just a tap but could’ve been a lot worse!!
At 31.05, the driver BMW braked due to a bird on the road, the cammer who was upset was aggressive and impatient. The bird survived. Always expect the unexpected.
When I was learning to drive, I passed my testt 1st time after 25 lessons, my instructor rammed the rule - MIRROR SIGNAL MANOUEVRE - into my subconcious. Think it helped me that I had been cycling for years beforehand making me more aware of other road users.
12:24 By watching that video, I would say the blue car is in the wrong . By using the wrong side of the road to come onto the roundabout. The blue car came out of the shops on the opposite side of the road. 21:15 When your car is lowered, you have to go a bit slower over the speed bumps. Some of the speed bumps are actually quite high. I’ve even seen someone rip, there sump out, going to fast over the speed bumps.
Another bicycle operator at 22:20 swerving around a joining car, in order to carry on cycling on the pavement (no little blue signs)... He certainly needs to learn the Highway Code...!
45:18 Feel like cammer should've changed lanes so that the van joining the motorway would've had somewhere to go rather than undertaking so dangerously like that towards the end
#6...So what has the car driver done wrong in that clip...Seems like the scooter rider is just a trouble maker..Hope the driver submitted the footage to a higher power.
If the driver didn't contest that warning i'd be mad for them. How can they issue on-the-spot things like that without reviewing the evidence? Madness. Furthermore as someone who drives for a living currently, I swear L plate scooters make up around 50% of the near misses I have on the daily just pulling into traffic without accounting for the stopping distance on a 4t van, riding dangerously and filtering badly in general. Is there actually ANY oversight to CBT riders or do they get their pass to drive from a box of crackers?
In the rear view you can see the scooter rider revving his scooter, the driver in the car then excessively sprays windscreen wash on him, you can see he then puts his visor down because it's in his eyes. Two wrongs don't make a right.
@@JasonShek So a car driver is in the wrong for using a built in function..what a load of rubbish...using the windscreen wash excessively.!!...never heard so much crap in my life.
#100 is why people need to be more educated about lorries. I understand you're going as fast as you'd like to go, but you're hanging out in the worst blind spot on a lorry. It's left hand drive, which can easily be seen by not only the plate but the kerb mirror being on the right hand door instead of the left, so that car was literally invisible to the driver.
When all lanes of traffic are moving at a similar pace and have been for a while, where exactly should the car move to accommodate an hgv driver not concentrating? .
#81 I totally agree. I’ve seen so many people pull this move. I was recently driving east in 25-40 mph traffic around the junction in wet, dark conditions, when a white van decided not to even bother crossing in front of traffic waiting to turn from pov’s right. Instead they turned into oncoming traffic and cut across a coach into the correct lane, by which time they had traveled to the bridge. I was two vehicles behind the coach & the near accidents caused where sphincter tightening & would’ve been across both lanes. It is only thanks to the road awareness of everyone & the instant evasive actions of those in the west lane and the coach and van ahead of me that there wasn’t a tragedy.
#84 Van driver was indicating before you arrived, you were in his blind spot so giving large vans a bit of space might even help you become a better driver.
First clip proves the old saying they ,she, he , has never had accident in x amount of years,, just caused lots in there rear veiw mirrors because there are oblivious to everyone else on the roads. 😮
You mean he was _coerced_ into saying he was wrong because of the implicit threat to his personal wellbeing because of social media?? Is THAT what you meant?
21:06 The silver linings here are, this was probably the first exercise this fine specimen of a human had in years. She is probably helping to to keep her local Vauxhall dealer going in replacement suspension parts and tyres and all the time she is out making a nuisance of herself on the road she ain't at home making her husbands life a misery.
#3........ I've seen this a few times, and, for me, the driver of the puddle jumper is as much, if not more, to blame. Yes, the van was in the wrong lane, but closing the gap and sounding the horn like that was obviously doing no good. Let them in...... all that hassle for the sake of 30 feet. Was it really worth it?
@idoeli382 The driver could tell what was happening and closed the gap. He could have backed off and could certainly have stopped. If the car behind the puddle jumper couldn't have stopped, then he was following too close anyway. Where did you get your license? From the bottom of a cerial box ?
Regarding the box junction (yellow box with diagonal yellow lines inside it), the rule is don't enter it unless your exit is clear. Not many drivers know this, and it is annoying when you stop before one, and a driver from the left or right just assumes your giving way and they pull in to it!
Police not looking at evidence before making their mind up? Never lol. I’d go to the traffic police with the evidence you have as that warning will stay as a marker on your registration number and drivers license unless you get it cleared up. The moped delivery driver was riding like a prat, undertaking, brake checking then playing the victim.
Agreed. And if it means that the moped driver belatedly gets his comeuppance, then so much the better. Although I would hold my breath waiting for that to happen because, after all (and with apologies to Orwell), two wheels good, four wheels bad.
#33 - cyclist needs to get a life and let it go. Sometimes people make mistakes. Copper stopped, apologised, and the other officer told him how he could make a complaint, said no, but carried on waffling about it.
From the roundabout they exited in the right lane as they should and from there it may be that the car was alongside them? Initially watching it I thought thy should be pulling in but given the car was creeping along not actually overtaking when it merged over I'd not be surprised if it was alongside preventing moving over for quite a while. Given the nature of the bump I then wondered if maybe it was an attempt at insurance fraud but it doesn't look right for that either so I've got no idea.
Either (a) because that car was already on his inside or (b) he knows the road and was anticipating a vehicle leaving the busy parking area (c) both of the above or (d) a penguin. But, in general, a lot of issues on these (and other) clips are caused by very poor lane discipline.
#37 😂😂 What was his problem , Cyclist shouldn’t have been speeding on the path anyway , it was funny how he crashed into the railings then tried to blame the bloke waiting to pull out 🤣think he was a bit embarrassed 🤣
24:54 I hope the dashcam footage was given to whoever required it? @ 47:29 The van was indicating to pull away, even before the camera car arrived. 50:46 What are they waiting for? Camera vehicle could pass. 52:14 Use the left hand lane after clearing a roundabout (if it is empty?) Some people drive to create material for dash cams. How sad.
God I actually hate the ones on bikes like that guy that “almost” got hit by the police car like dude the police are under constant stress and people make mistakes so to humiliate and make someone feel horrible over something that stupid is unbelievable
Uber drivers/riders, your delivery isn't an emergency. The time spent should be discussed with them. They clearly don't pay enough for you to do it safely or reasonably.
In #8, I think the van driver was possibly looking in their offside mirror in preparation for parking. No excuse for not checking what's coming towards them though!
#1 I could see how the car from the side road had started to pull out & saw on coming traffic so waited for it to clear so could feel they were already on the road & expect other traffic to wait behind them, as if they were part of that traffic already.
Seen #3 before and people actually thought it's a good thing that they stood their ground. After all, "what would the other person learn if they didnt?"
well the cammer probably took 50% (or more) of the blame through insurance... so congratulations, you really taught those guys a lesson rather than just letting them in and cracking on with your day.
My comment was "its pretty obvious the White Van is going to try and push in, whilst I don't agree with that behaviour, its easier to just let them get in front of you and call it. Otherwise... you are just as liable for not preventing an accident as much as the other driver is for causing it".
If only he'd dabbed the brakes as quickly as he hit the horn, this would have been a non-event.
Unless vans lane on the right was marked Right Only, he had every right to drive straight on. Both are idiots tbh
The junction in no4 appears in multiple clips, it's probably time for a rethink or a roundabout!
The plank was driving far too close to the small car in front of him anyway. Just stupid driving.
Sorry did you say the car driver in number 6 was handed a warning? I would contest if so!
Deffers...
I'd have bounced the police straight into court, dashcam is legal evidence and accepted as such in a court of law.
No wonder the police have no respect, that's because most of them are jobsworth Muppets
@@TisAndrew it would also be interesting to know if the motorcyclist had insurance that covered commercial use.
@@rampak1 Are you insinuating that they wouldn't because theyre doing food delivery? Maybe you've never applied to do this job but they ask for proof of insurance before even giving you the job and the insurance wouldn't matter regardless since its vehicle on vehicle, nothing to do with the food he is carrying.
@@TisAndrew obviously if the company checked that he had valid insurance then he was insured. However I don't understand your comment about it being immaterial. The law says that if you use a vehicle in connection with a trade or business, the vehicle needs specific insurance for that purpose. The only exception is driving directly between your home and a permanent place of business.
1:34 _"Although my horn was sounded, people still managed to realise it was me who was the complete and utter idiot"_
The bell end crashing his bike speeding on a pavement and blaming the car is what is so wrong with so many on the road. Take some responsibility 😂
and the crash prevented the cyclist from running the red light too, no wonder he was so angry, haha
the music is class during it
No# 33 at 20:03 mark at least the copper did apologise and no damage done
So you probably should have just forgive and forget!
He should of, it was just an accident. He owned and apologised, admitted he was wrong and even was willing to provide him information to make a complaint against him.
That's the trouble with the social media community! If the mistake had been his he would have apologized, expected it to have been accepted and went on his way. Oh no, why would he do that? Might not get enough likes - clown!!!
the amount of people that could have fixed the situation by just letting someone in is ridiculous! is their ego really that fragile?
Yes.
i think is Stress
No.3 were both fools.
13:11 this crash would've been completely avoided had the cammer waited behind the car to complete the left turn instead of overtaking in a junction
Driver courtesy, common sense and reasonableness is are thing of the past, i'm afraid. it's more common for drivers to cause animosity, confrontation and anger rather than show calm good sense.
Did 90 want to wait until there wasn’t a single other road user visible? Good Lord, man, you have to go at some point
Exactly.... sits there holding up traffic, then complains if somebody goes around d..
@@henkmeerdink936 big trucks like the ones he driving don't accelerate that fast to he has to wait longer than cars would......
@@fpser4888 I've driven HGVs for 33 years, I know that it takes time to get going. He correctly waited after the first lot came past, to wait for the car approaching at some speed, but after that one, he could (and should) have gone.
Ye at the point he should go he just sits there. The police car/ambulance puts their signal on super early. He missed his chance to go.. Plus he had right of way since they was turning right but he was giving way to them. Poor driving.
That cyclist with the police needs a life man, just move on
No
@@dwhhhhhhhhhh Definitely. The police officer WAS technically at fault as he lingered a second too long on checking his right as he left the corner, but the cyclist was masked by the parked car. It was all at low speed and wouldn't have been a serious accident. The cyclist made it sound like he'd uncovered widespread corruption in South Yorkshire Police.
Dude took zero evasive action, can't argue who had 'right of way' if you're 6ft under.
Yes, totally ridiculous - just go home man and thank god you're alive, it's not worth it.
The same could be said of 99% of the clips in this video
Many of these videos do show terrible and/or intolerant driving. However, anyone can make a mistake, and in some clips that is what has happened.
In a long life of driving I have had a number of narrow escapes. Some were my fault, some were someone else's fault. When it's been my fault I try to learn from it and avoid the same mistake again, that's how life is.
Sensible comment. Elephant stamp in your exercise book.
Rumour has it #90 is still sitting there waiting
Should be ticketed for impeding traffic. 2 clear opportunities to pass.
How is anyone supposed to know which clip you're talking about?
Edit: nevermind I didn't see the numbers in the button right 😂
#60 those wheels have been kerbed for a while mate. You don't get brake dust and road dirt in scrapes like that in a couple hundred yards 😂
I actually had the exact same thought that didn't look like fresh damage 😂
#3 Of course. Teaching a lesson by sounding the horn till it die and not slowing down only ended up in a heavy repair bill and an absolute mess. Sometimes we should know how to let things go maturely and later deal with it.
Also you had to stand on the mid curb, holding the broken piece looking like an idiot to the ingoing traffics.😅
#90 wtf are you waiting for?! Christmas?! There were several opportunities for you to go safely, even with a fully loaded wagon. Undue hesitation
Exactly
he had three huge gaps, the ambulance and another car were turning onto side roads and their was literally no reason he couldn't have gone 🤣🤣🤣
Absolute rubbish. Not sure what he's driving but I certainly wouldn't have taken a bus through. If he had then the last clip would be from one of the oncoming cars entitled 'look- nasty selfish lorry driver pulls out to pass car transporter and makes me stop '. He's going to need to pull right over the other side of the road (about 3-5 secs) then drive 80 feet (40 ft of transporter + 40 ft for his own vehicle at least) on the wrong side to clear the stationery transporter. Say he does this 'recklessly' at 10 mph, (10 mph = 15 ft/sec) thus 80 ft = 5.5 sec, then 3 -5 secs to straighten back onto left hand side of road. Total time required not to inconvenience oncoming traffic = 11.5 - 15 secs. Now see how many car come within 80' of the back of the transporter within 15 secs. Note his minute frustration when one of the cars turns left without a signal, as this advanced notice would have given him the space he needed. The wait is justified. if you don't agree, then either you're a car driver or could be considered to be driving a truck on your weight. PS same argument at #58, absolutely no chance of getting through without obstructing oncoming traffic.
I hope that car driver downloaded the footage, handed it into a senior officer at the nearest police station along with a written complaint against the officers involved. The next stage if not satisfied is a formal complaint to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (formerly the Police Complaints Commission).
I would not trust 'les flics'. Ignoring video evidence and assuming that a lesser vehicle is automatically in the right.
just refuse the warning, and if the copper says owt, state that they are perverting the course of justice and it will be reported to their senior officer AND IOPC.
They are not acting with respect to their sworn aoth/attestation, the aren't applying the law just summary kangeroo BS, thus they no longer have authority over you in any case.
Just tell them to go away and drive off.
@@ynotnilknarf39doesn’t really apply when you’re driving, you don’t have the same rights.
Crown Prosecution rules state officers have the duty to collate evidence when presented. So not being interested in watching the video footage, which would directly prove innocence or guilt, just means they failed in their duty.
@@MiningForPies yes you do, plod have sworn an oath and to uphold law. them not looking at the evidence which was an actual fact of the events - which was offered and declined, and not upholding their oaths regards fairness and favour, makes that a perversion of justice, they meted out summary judgement and punishment without the facts and based on their 'feeling' at best but when they were offered facts and declined it then that's them perverting justice
#6 - Norwich cops are notorious for not actually checking evidence handed to them
Well that’s just wrong cause cammer definitely didn’t do anything wrong from that footage #6!
You mean you heard a rumour and believe it because you are an uneducated twat…
I’d have went to court with that one
#3....yes they tried to push in, but you could have quite easily dropped back and just let them in to avoid the collision. 50/50 on that one
I quite agree, there’s a lot like this. As a car driver, motorcyclist and cyclist, I’ve learnt that discretion is the better part of valour. I think some folk with cameras are delighted when they clock someone doing something silly. I wonder if they’re perfect drivers ?
@@user-rf9me7xm1w I very much doubt they are. I have car, motorcycle and HGV licences so have experienced the roads from all points of view. My conclusion is that every form of vehicle has good and bad drivers and that the vast majority of 'minor' incidents could have been avoided by drivers looking further ahead and just giving way to impatience rather than trying to get their bo**ocks out!
@@nathanaelwarden Yes, well said, nobody’s perfect. Observation and spacial awareness is a must and has served me well during my 57 years on the road.
#6. I think i've said it when it was originally posted, but again: I hope the driver of the car went to the police station with his footage. And asked them why the colleges didn't want to see it.
Don't do that, just mark the time lol, it's easier to see what your talking about.
21:05 omg is that triggly puff? A meme legend.
omg just get a life dude, let people mark the video number if they want.@@alimetodista3459
If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence.
Covering someone with screen wash might be an infringement of the road traffic act.
@@mikeheasman2594 I think having 'Deliveroo' on the back of your motorbike or bicycle implies that you will infringe the Road Traffic Act in some way or another within the next 50 yds. QED
I don't see the issue in #7, the cammer slows down to let the van out then starts swearing about it?
Same, I’ve been trying to figure out what exactly happened
I was looking for someone to make a comment about it. Same the clip doesn't make sense to me.
the only thing I can think of is that he's moaning at the black car in front for not letting the van out and "closing the gap unnecessarily" but it's really nothing.
A lot of the clips are just nothingness
He needs to grow a pair and stop whining about the littilest things
Good stuff here ! I'm a (bloody) Yank who enjoys seeing how other places have as many bad drivers as we do .
Plus, your road rules are *slightly* different so I learn by watching .
-Nate
haha, i love to watch the US dash cams and its good to see its not just the UK:P I specially like to watch how you guys are coping with roundabouts over there!
Well Peter : the sad truth is : American driver's are pretty bad these days, no more driver's education programs etc. ....
-Nate@@peterroberts7921
@@peterroberts7921 I encountered rotaries when on holiday driving around Massachusetts. I was gratified to note Americans don't have a clue how to drive round them either!
At 19.30 minutes
For me 'sorry' usually enough. Everyone makes mistakes
So glad I'm fortunate enough to have retired after 40years of driving and not one accident. Even drove a London double decker for 12 years and no incidents.
First thing I did after retiring was to sell my car. So much stress driving in the 21st century with the amount of idiots out there.
Thanks for the great video.
I'm never driving so I don't have to deal with or god forbid BECOME one of these morons, bloody love the bus services. Thanks for doing one of the most stressful jobs in transport mate, you bus lads don't get thanked half as often as you should
Sooo you pussied out?
Come to Australia. We don't have the paralysing traffic situations that you folk have to put up with. I have English pals here who go home to see family occasionally, and they can't wait to get back here, largely owing to the traffic and the idiots on UK roads.
#3 instead of just being annoyed and letting the van in, you’ve ended up with a damaged car, a damaged ego and a large repair bill.
By the way “sounding your horn” will not alter your physical reality - you can still be hit with it running you know.
he might have had a car behind him
@@idoeli382 and? You say that’s like it’s relevant.
@@idoeli382He might have also been wearing a red sweater.
@idoeli382 who will slow down when this guy does. It's not a bloody motorway, just meters away from a damn roundabout.
@@Jimmyspangle Great idea. Van drivers like that would love to read this.
First video, the dash cam driver new what was going to happen and still drove on up ahead without due attention. i love how these dash cam owners always think they're right
'Yes sorry about that! There's a good chap' said the copper to the cyclist. lol you gotta love the English.
Loved the biker clip through the back of Bournemouth town, 5:46 it’s 20 right through there…
36:47 I'm sorry... was that a Lukasz clip where he DIDN'T crash and WASN'T in the wrong?! Thought we'd never see the day.
What is this 'NextBase', is it the make of camera?
For #3, pride has to take a back seat even if you are in the right else you end up with a collision like this if neither of you backs down, and in 90% of these situations I've been in, the driver trying to dodge ahead of you won't back down.
Don't do that, just mark the time lol, it's easier to see what your talking about.
@@alimetodista3459 It's literally the 3rd video, its super easy to use the number on the first and last few. Chill out kid.
Would the cammer have done the same in his/her own car?
9:02 There is no clue as to what happened, whether the winch cable snapped or the hook wasn't secure, but you can't help feeling sorry for the operator who will suffer nightmares for months to come. I hope that any damage was not too serious and more important, no-one was hurt. 10:17 Basic driving technique observations include keep you head moving, right,left,right left all the way through a junction like this! It is a moot point whether this incident could have been avoided because the cyclist obviously was not caring for his own safety and rode straight off the pavement into a road, looking again at the dash cam footage, there is no evidence that the cyclist made any observations whatsoever.. Cyclist should have number plates on their bikes and carry insurance. 11:17 another prime example of the one and one makes two theory. A driver intends to move to the right hand lane approaching a junction. (should have moved over earlier the idiot (probably seeing the right indicator assumes the other is turning into the junction and, just to prove he is an idiot pulls out in front of the other vehicle, the driver of the "victim" car then decides he is going to carve up the idiot and cut across in front of his just to prove one idiot plus one idiot makes two idiots. 11:58 A zebra crossing with a central island is two separate crossings (see Rule 20 Highway Code) so it would appear that the white car driver did not commit an offence. However, Pelican crossings which go straight across the road are one crossing, even when there is a central island. You MUST wait for pedestrians who are crossing from the other side of the island. So the white car driver DID commit an offence. The use of the word 'must' in the Highway Code is not accidental! 12:09 1+1 = 2? 15:02 The DL 25 and its descendants have the category "Drive at a speed appropriate to road and traffic conditions and I have known candidates to fail for driving too slowly as we see here, the over cautious driver causes a frustrated driver to act the idiot and have a little game of brake check (please ... not break check!), thus putting other road users in danger; overtake when it is safe to do so otherwise, be patient and wait for an opportunity. Any driver, while they are driving are not the judge and jury, we are all only drivers. The Peugeot driver was lucky to get away with his attempt to gain retribution! 16:54 The most important initials at junctions, I use to drum into my pupils were L F I -- 'look for idiots' and the van driver failed to do so, he was lucky, he got away with a handshake, it could have been so easily "causing death by dangerous driving". 18:04 The two second rule seems to have disappeared from driving language, anyway, as this clip shows, two seconds is a woefully inadequate gap to leave on a fast road, 4 to 6 seconds should be a minimum depending upon weather. 20:22 I had a pupil who did a lovely "emergency" controlled stop when a policeman pulled his car out in front of us. To his credit, the policemen got out of his car and apologised to the pupil, and gave her a good piece of advice, "even experts make stupid mistakes, I apologise for mine". 22:09 As far as I could see, there were no "No Entry" signs at the beginning of the coned area denoting a one way road and even at the dash cam's entry point there were two "arrow" signs, one saying keep left of the cones and the other saying "take off from here and fly to the left" bad signage is the culprit here (as far as the clip takes the viewer) not the drivers apparently driving in the wrong direction. 22:03 I love the cyclist blaming everyone for wrecking his bike! 27:29 Obviously a perpetual learner driver biker. Why are companies like pizza purveyors allowed to employ learner drivers to deliver their goods -- and what is the situation with insurance companies when these learners cause a serious accident? 229:13 There is no such thing as a 'fast lane' on British roads all lanes on a carriageway are subject to the same speed limit. There is no such thing as 'undertaking' (which would defy the laws of physics) there is overtaking in the wrong lane, however if the traffic is going more slowly in a two lane road (which is essentially what one side of a dual carriageway is) then it is legal to overtake on the left in these circumstances. 29:47 Absolutely agree, however that driver should have been banned for deliberate dangerous driving. 30:51 A lady who's imagination needs to be exercised but not half so much as the imagination of the local authority who should have banned parking all the way down the approach to this roadworks -- and enforced it! 34:30 This time a cyclist without imagination! What was to stop him getting off his bike pushing it through the (the) adequate gap and continuing. The world does not belong to the 'lycra clad'! 36:39 The drivers passed (verb) their tests, when they received their full licence, they were past (adverb) their test . 45:36 Great slogan on the back of the van : "Solutions for living" not where its driver is concerned. However, what would have been wrong if the "cammer" had simply taken his foot off the gas for a few seconds and avoided a near collision?
48:28 That motorcycle 'falling over' was a blatant insurance scam. 49:55 Perhaps if the cammer had not deliberately closed the gap on the idiot 1 idiot + 1 idiot would not have made two idiots. 50:21 There were at least three occasions when, depending on the size of the vehicle this driver could have passed the car carrier with complete safety. It is correct to give way when the obstruction is on your side, but there is no law that says you have to wait until the driver of the obstruction finishes whatever he is doing before you can go.
1:25 - that smart car is the bomb! Literally. Cool plate lol
I literally just crashed my work van on the way home from work so I’m watching these to make me feel better about it lol. Wasn’t a bad crash just a tap but could’ve been a lot worse!!
Glad you are okay!
No 33 what a bell
Is the guy at 8:37 seriously trying to drive that vehicle up the ramps from OUTSIDE the car?
Love the hgv driver in #58 letting the berk in the van know how he felt about it. Glad to see someone put someone in their place
Are number 58 and 90 the same driver? Because they both seem to love waiting for absolutely no reason
Yes they are. Yes he's perfectly right to wait that long in both cases.
At 31.05, the driver BMW braked due to a bird on the road, the cammer who was upset was aggressive and impatient. The bird survived. Always expect the unexpected.
You can't slam your brakes on because you see a bird, have some common sense
1:24 - Horn was sounded? I couldn't hear it... Self inflicted that, and the tailgating and outcome was so at odds with the calming classical tunes :D
41 - the Manny just having his Lunch time pint, watching it all unfold like its a regular occurrence...... My man!
When I was learning to drive, I passed my testt 1st time after 25 lessons, my instructor rammed the rule - MIRROR SIGNAL MANOUEVRE - into my subconcious. Think it helped me that I had been cycling for years beforehand making me more aware of other road users.
When was the driving test abolished in the UK? It must have been recent, as drivers paid more attention, and were more attentive just a few years ago.
12:24 By watching that video, I would say the blue car is in the wrong . By using the wrong side of the road to come onto the roundabout. The blue car came out of the shops on the opposite side of the road. 21:15 When your car is lowered, you have to go a bit slower over the speed bumps. Some of the speed bumps are actually quite high. I’ve even seen someone rip, there sump out, going to fast over the speed bumps.
Well, we all understand that lowering your car so that it hits speed bumps is obligatory. Other drivers should expect to be held up.
Another bicycle operator at 22:20 swerving around a joining car, in order to carry on cycling on the pavement (no little blue signs)... He certainly needs to learn the Highway Code...!
45:18
Feel like cammer should've changed lanes so that the van joining the motorway would've had somewhere to go rather than undertaking so dangerously like that towards the end
The 2nd clip is my manager 🤣🤣🤣🤣
1:34 😂😂😂😂 Bet you wish you'd let him win that pishing competition now, eh?
#6...So what has the car driver done wrong in that clip...Seems like the scooter rider is just a trouble maker..Hope the driver submitted the footage to a higher power.
If the driver didn't contest that warning i'd be mad for them.
How can they issue on-the-spot things like that without reviewing the evidence? Madness.
Furthermore as someone who drives for a living currently, I swear L plate scooters make up around 50% of the near misses I have on the daily just pulling into traffic without accounting for the stopping distance on a 4t van, riding dangerously and filtering badly in general. Is there actually ANY oversight to CBT riders or do they get their pass to drive from a box of crackers?
In the rear view you can see the scooter rider revving his scooter, the driver in the car then excessively sprays windscreen wash on him, you can see he then puts his visor down because it's in his eyes. Two wrongs don't make a right.
@@JasonShek So a car driver is in the wrong for using a built in function..what a load of rubbish...using the windscreen wash excessively.!!...never heard so much crap in my life.
@@Reddsoldier agreed.
It was with malicious intent, a car can also go above 70mph, what's your point?@@doctorsocrates4413
nothing happened in 5:13
I must have watched it four times and I still can't understand what the problem was!?
#100 is why people need to be more educated about lorries. I understand you're going as fast as you'd like to go, but you're hanging out in the worst blind spot on a lorry. It's left hand drive, which can easily be seen by not only the plate but the kerb mirror being on the right hand door instead of the left, so that car was literally invisible to the driver.
When all lanes of traffic are moving at a similar pace and have been for a while, where exactly should the car move to accommodate an hgv driver not concentrating? .
22:04 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣.. the perfect toon too !! lmao
#81 I totally agree. I’ve seen so many people pull this move. I was recently driving east in 25-40 mph traffic around the junction in wet, dark conditions, when a white van decided not to even bother crossing in front of traffic waiting to turn from pov’s right. Instead they turned into oncoming traffic and cut across a coach into the correct lane, by which time they had traveled to the bridge. I was two vehicles behind the coach & the near accidents caused where sphincter tightening & would’ve been across both lanes. It is only thanks to the road awareness of everyone & the instant evasive actions of those in the west lane and the coach and van ahead of me that there wasn’t a tragedy.
#84 Van driver was indicating before you arrived, you were in his blind spot so giving large vans a bit of space might even help you become a better driver.
21:05 omg is that triggly puff? A meme legend.
First clip proves the old saying they ,she, he , has never had accident in x amount of years,, just caused lots in there rear veiw mirrors because there are oblivious to everyone else on the roads. 😮
21.05 that’s the most she’s moved ever! She does not need air bags!
21:15 she moved so fast I thought the cammer had free doughnuts.
Makes you want to cry
21:23 It's Bradford what you expect , need a say more 😂
Next time I'm in Edinburgh, I'll stop by at The Scottie for a wee swally. Looks like a great craic.
how did they ever pass thier test
Thanks as usual
21:00 mark, what a salad dodging whopper
Fair play to the guy for admitting he was wrong. 😘
You mean he was _coerced_ into saying he was wrong because of the implicit threat to his personal wellbeing because of social media??
Is THAT what you meant?
BigBird @20:16, if she's(assumption) in such a rush why did they stop and waste time to kick the other drivers car...... hilarious
21:06 The silver linings here are, this was probably the first exercise this fine specimen of a human had in years. She is probably helping to to keep her local Vauxhall dealer going in replacement suspension parts and tyres and all the time she is out making a nuisance of herself on the road she ain't at home making her husbands life a misery.
State of it; probably won't be around much longer.
#3........ I've seen this a few times, and, for me, the driver of the puddle jumper is as much, if not more, to blame. Yes, the van was in the wrong lane, but closing the gap and sounding the horn like that was obviously doing no good. Let them in...... all that hassle for the sake of 30 feet. Was it really worth it?
Keep in mind there may have been a car behind him too and he couldn't stop
@@idoeli382 what on earth are you talking about? Unless the car is physically pushing him forward he certainly can stop if he wants.
@idoeli382 The driver could tell what was happening and closed the gap. He could have backed off and could certainly have stopped. If the car behind the puddle jumper couldn't have stopped, then he was following too close anyway.
Where did you get your license? From the bottom of a cerial box ?
Was there someone in the back of car in clip 13 ?
At 58:45 Motorbike at fault. Disregard and entitlement. I'm a biker over 40 years....that is amateur at its worst.
Regarding the box junction (yellow box with diagonal yellow lines inside it), the rule is don't enter it unless your exit is clear. Not many drivers know this, and it is annoying when you stop before one, and a driver from the left or right just assumes your giving way and they pull in to it!
Police not looking at evidence before making their mind up? Never lol.
I’d go to the traffic police with the evidence you have as that warning will stay as a marker on your registration number and drivers license unless you get it cleared up.
The moped delivery driver was riding like a prat, undertaking, brake checking then playing the victim.
Agreed. And if it means that the moped driver belatedly gets his comeuppance, then so much the better. Although I would hold my breath waiting for that to happen because, after all (and with apologies to Orwell), two wheels good, four wheels bad.
At 23:57, what was the driver supposed to do? I don't see anything wrong there, except for the self-righteous text over the video.
11:01 I thought they were chilled drinking scrumpy and Meade down Somerset 😮😮
#72 is funny the way it's sped up. The two waddling drivers look like they belong in a silent movie from the 1920's.
1:15 W.A.Mozart - Clarinet Concerto in A major, K. 622, II. Adagio - I love it
If it was really Best of the Month I'd watch but it isn't, it's all of the month.
Christ I thought it couldn't get any worse, but it looks like it can 😢
#33 - cyclist needs to get a life and let it go. Sometimes people make mistakes. Copper stopped, apologised, and the other officer told him how he could make a complaint, said no, but carried on waffling about it.
#93 - Why did the cammer hog the outside lane when both lanes were clear. That is what caused the problem with the car under taking.
From the roundabout they exited in the right lane as they should and from there it may be that the car was alongside them? Initially watching it I thought thy should be pulling in but given the car was creeping along not actually overtaking when it merged over I'd not be surprised if it was alongside preventing moving over for quite a while. Given the nature of the bump I then wondered if maybe it was an attempt at insurance fraud but it doesn't look right for that either so I've got no idea.
Either (a) because that car was already on his inside or (b) he knows the road and was anticipating a vehicle leaving the busy parking area (c) both of the above or (d) a penguin.
But, in general, a lot of issues on these (and other) clips are caused by very poor lane discipline.
The guy on the moped @28:22 🤣
#37 😂😂 What was his problem , Cyclist shouldn’t have been speeding on the path anyway , it was funny how he crashed into the railings then tried to blame the bloke waiting to pull out 🤣think he was a bit embarrassed 🤣
its so cool when you see somewhere where you recognise #3 is in Winchester up by the m3 roundabout
People sat in car rolling backwards never had the sense to pull the handbrake on 😂
20mins must be great to be perfect. "gonna name and shame" you need a name 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🛎️end ALERT
24:54 I hope the dashcam footage was given to whoever required it? @ 47:29 The van was indicating to pull away, even before the camera car arrived. 50:46 What are they waiting for? Camera vehicle could pass. 52:14 Use the left hand lane after clearing a roundabout (if it is empty?) Some people drive to create material for dash cams. How sad.
I really dont understand how some people get a driving license.
what was the classic music in the video at 1.38
God I actually hate the ones on bikes like that guy that “almost” got hit by the police car like dude the police are under constant stress and people make mistakes so to humiliate and make someone feel horrible over something that stupid is unbelievable
#4 has all the action,
I would put my settee by the window And watch tonight‘s entertainment 😂
I love how much of this footage comes from my hometown of Birmingham. I KNEW we had a bigger percentage of nutters here 😂
Nootters in Bermingum? Never!
15:49 I guess the pub's name describes this car 😂
16:25
Oh hey, one near where I live. Not first time I've seen that happen there.
IS IT ME OR IS THE UPLOADER REPEATING VIDEOS HERE?????
It’s a best of video
try reading the title
Uber drivers/riders, your delivery isn't an emergency. The time spent should be discussed with them. They clearly don't pay enough for you to do it safely or reasonably.
I can see the problem here is the more dash cams we use, the less police are around
In #8, I think the van driver was possibly looking in their offside mirror in preparation for parking. No excuse for not checking what's coming towards them though!
why would you report that delivery guy dancing????? thought is was funny as hell
As ever, a lot of the clips are needlessly far too long before and after the incidents, makes for a boring watch mostly
Es justo reconocer que el tipo admitió que se equivocó.
21:06 look at that lardy waddle from that `woman`(? maybe?) funniest thing ive seen all day haha!
Sorry but at the time 1:50 really 😅Haha 😂😂😂😂😂
#1 I could see how the car from the side road had started to pull out & saw on coming traffic so waited for it to clear so could feel they were already on the road & expect other traffic to wait behind them, as if they were part of that traffic already.