The "Aerial Cruise Ship" but it Actually Works (SkyCruise Part 1)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 июл 2024
  • Today we design a skycruise-style aircraft, but with one main distinction from the rendered variant: It actually could maybe feasibly fly? Of course it's another flyout video, and I hope you all enjoy!
    ATTENTION: Flyout is currently unable to give out any more steam keys. In order to purchase the game, you will have to wait for the steam release. Thank you for understanding
    Flyout Discord (JOIN FOR MORE INFO ON GAME): / discord
    [Join my discord!]: / discord
    Twitch: / messier82ap
    Special thank you to Lena for making my thumbnail!
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 438

  • @blaybladeefoda6470
    @blaybladeefoda6470 Год назад +1229

    13:03
    "Gentle flight"
    Does a 60 degree bank turn; tosses everything inside, drowns swimmers, floods plane.

    • @messier82ac
      @messier82ac  Год назад +396

      Just the pilots having some fun

    • @VikingHaag
      @VikingHaag Год назад +163

      Imagine the poor kitchen staff and especially the underpaid line cook on fry duty. Sure hope you have an onboard level 1 trauma center to treat stab wounds, amputated fingers and third degree burns.

    • @SpessCaptain
      @SpessCaptain Год назад +88

      “We do a little trolling.”

    • @thefuturerex0197
      @thefuturerex0197 Год назад +33

      @@VikingHaagI am currently contemplating that there would be professional,sharp deadly knives sent flying across the room into the wall killing whatever is on the other side

    • @iamarizonaball2642
      @iamarizonaball2642 Год назад +5

      @@messier82acplease make a modern version of the P192 Saunders Roe Queen.

  • @Monsterpat37
    @Monsterpat37 Год назад +1009

    You couldn’t paint the plane because it would put a company out of business just to buy the paint

    • @sergiyhoncharuk5396
      @sergiyhoncharuk5396 Год назад +104

      more like with some old rockets, with such a huge surface, paint alone could add some tons of weight and you'd rather spend those in any other way but painting the thing.

    • @Carl10169
      @Carl10169 Год назад +8

      Exactly

    • @bobman36
      @bobman36 Год назад +31

      Whenever I draw spaceships I always think “how long would it take to paint that”

    • @shermanfox7338
      @shermanfox7338 Год назад +6

      And it would make the thing even more heavy

    • @callumwright7459
      @callumwright7459 Год назад +42

      @@bobman36 That's actually a thing in Star Wars, one of the reasons given for why the Empire used plain grey, instead of the more elaborate colour schemes of pre-war and clone wars era ships, is that the plain grey primer was the cheapest and quickest paint job.

  • @chixinspace
    @chixinspace Год назад +680

    The guy who created the video and renders of the flying city actually made it as a world building excercise and it unexpectedly went completely viral. The guy was having an absolutely fantastic time watching the bullshit spread and the drama unfold, was quite funny to see

    • @OrdinaryLatvian
      @OrdinaryLatvian Год назад +120

      I saw the original post in r/worldbuilding, and then watched in terror how it spread like wildfire.
      If something as benign as a silly airplane video can grow to that level, imagine the damage something deliberate, like political misinformation, can do.

    • @kjj26k
      @kjj26k Год назад

      ​@@OrdinaryLatvian
      Shit could paralyze populations, destabilize the world, start wars--
      Oh wait

    • @amentco8445
      @amentco8445 Год назад +22

      ​@@OrdinaryLatvian Of course, you can trust the news stations and intelligence agencies to keep reporting the truth

    • @kenetickups6146
      @kenetickups6146 Год назад +6

      @@amentco8445they never said that

    • @evansnyder430
      @evansnyder430 Год назад +3

      I was made to study it’s viability in my college “Aviation Physical Science” class.

  • @MyNam3IsR0
    @MyNam3IsR0 Год назад +134

    Just as they say, “ A architect’s dream. Is a engineer’s nightmare. “

    • @roaling2
      @roaling2 9 месяцев назад +5

      ‼️‼️Real Civil Engineer Fan Alert ‼️‼️

    • @MyNam3IsR0
      @MyNam3IsR0 9 месяцев назад +5

      @@roaling2 OH NO, MY COVER HAS BEEN BLOWN

    • @brokeandtired
      @brokeandtired 9 месяцев назад

      And a terrorists wet dream....

    • @loco4loco
      @loco4loco 8 месяцев назад

      @@MyNam3IsR0you shall be forgiven

    • @MyNam3IsR0
      @MyNam3IsR0 8 месяцев назад

      @@loco4loco yayyy

  • @yzgrdyn-WiseGuardian-
    @yzgrdyn-WiseGuardian- Год назад +384

    I kinda want to see what it would look like next to a standard passenger jet.

    • @messier82ac
      @messier82ac  Год назад +153

      Oh it completely dwarfs a regular passenger jet, I should get a full model from someone and post it in my hangar in the flyout server

    • @isaacm1929
      @isaacm1929 Год назад +3

      You wouldn't see. The jet would be to small lol.
      /j

    • @theak1910
      @theak1910 Год назад +6

      I wanna see it next to the AN-225.

    • @GooseOfYork
      @GooseOfYork Год назад +5

      The Spruce Goose would look like a duckling next to this, its wingspan is half this thing's length
      Also, if I can get a top-down view of this thing, I will make a size comparison against other large aircraft and other stuff

    • @mederikhamelin8565
      @mederikhamelin8565 Год назад +7

      ​@@theak1910 the AN-225 Mirya has a wingspan of around 88.4 meters and a length of 84 meters. THIS monstrosity of a plane that he just built has a length of possibly over 200 meters and a wingspan of about 220 meters. Essentially, the Skycruise is almost THREE TIMES the size of the Antonov-225 Mirya. THREE. TIMES!!! For another comparison, just ONE of the engines is larger than most Cessnas. The tail wings or fins are basically the wingspan of the AN-225. Hope that explains to you a little bit.

  • @akidafloof
    @akidafloof Год назад +112

    5:44
    "The first thing I did of course was build a fuselage"
    Plane: *_Already 90% done_*

    • @messier82ac
      @messier82ac  Год назад +44

      lmao, the program crashed when I tried to edit the timelapse footage, so I gave up on trying to proportionally segment it

    • @akidafloof
      @akidafloof Год назад +5

      @@messier82ac nice, also mach 1 prop plane that beats the ThunderScreech at its own game when lol

  • @reimuchan003
    @reimuchan003 Год назад +30

    The fact that the Sky Cruise went from someone's test 3d model in r/worldbuilding reddit to a real project in major newsites will always be funny to me

  • @guppo26
    @guppo26 Год назад +43

    Having an observation deck on top but not on the bottom of a plane that's 'always' in the sky seems like a massive oversight to me. The original drawing does have some cupola looking things on the side, but even that isn't cutting it. Being able to look directly down on all the mountains, lakes and cities you're flying over would be the main reason to have something like this.

    • @fmobus
      @fmobus Год назад +29

      Of course it's an oversight. If it was on the bottom, it would be an undersight.
      *tudumpsh*

    • @theoriginaldrdust
      @theoriginaldrdust Год назад +8

      @@fmobusand you're about to have nosight *pulls out laser*

    • @eekee6034
      @eekee6034 Год назад +1

      lolol best comment and @@fmobus's is great too! It would make a great platform for the largest telescope ever built, but it's not an observation deck.

    • @Urssaff
      @Urssaff 11 месяцев назад +4

      Well the solution is to flip the aircraft upside dow whenever someone wants to look below.
      What could possibly go wrong after all

  • @davidecarucci1073
    @davidecarucci1073 Год назад +17

    Funny thing is that the original render isnt even real, its just a model someone made for fun and then sites started using it because they didnt have an idea for a clickbait article

  • @lucchesi87
    @lucchesi87 Год назад +199

    As a mechanical engineer, I instantly fell in love with your channel. I can't wait for the release

    • @thelethalpredator672
      @thelethalpredator672 Год назад +10

      Same. I love the look of this game and love the guys channel

    • @messier82ac
      @messier82ac  Год назад +33

      Thank you! I am super glad for the support from everyone. Haven't met a supporter who isn't super cool so far :)

    • @thelethalpredator672
      @thelethalpredator672 Год назад +4

      ​@messier82ac no problem man. The first video I saw of yours got recommended to me. Was your chat gpt "can ai build a jet" just under a month ago. Seen every video since and subbed. This game does look real cool. Such a shame it's only got 1 dev to my knowledge. And been in development for 6 years. But for 1 dev, they've done a fantastic job

    • @ridgelineenjoyer1517
      @ridgelineenjoyer1517 Год назад +2

      As somebody who wants to do mechanical engineering I also fell in love with this channel

  • @whispering_ace
    @whispering_ace Год назад +86

    Honestly a unique aircraft needs a name beyond its concept idea, i recomend either The Ouranos or Atlas liner for its titanic size and relation to the sky

    • @ledocteur7701
      @ledocteur7701 Год назад +12

      maybe something like "The Everclear" as in always flying in the clear sky.

    • @lazzacs
      @lazzacs Год назад +5

      Or skygate

    • @mm-qq7bb
      @mm-qq7bb 9 месяцев назад

      Call it titanic 2 lmao

    • @loco4loco
      @loco4loco 8 месяцев назад

      @@lazzacsthe skygate scandal…

    • @CWINDOWSsystem32
      @CWINDOWSsystem32 3 месяца назад

      @@lazzacs A project of this magnitude is bound to be riddled with controversy, might as well get it out of the way with the name.

  • @skyekid1
    @skyekid1 Год назад +46

    THIS IS A FULL UP RIGHT DIRECTION FOR YOU! Directly starting with the build encaptures attention, so anyone who clicks on this would continue watching, Best video yet!👍 I loved it!

  • @joshadams5602
    @joshadams5602 Год назад +57

    If there were a peaceful flight simulator akin to MS Flight Sim set in the world of Ace Combat, this would be exactly the kind of aircraft I'd expect to see in it.

    • @keithwasntbarrumsing483
      @keithwasntbarrumsing483 Год назад +6

      Hresvelgr passenger edition???

    • @notaulgoodman9732
      @notaulgoodman9732 Год назад +11

      Civilian B-52s, C-5s. The an-225 would be in active production. Flying boats would still be a thing.

    • @gabrielhenson5751
      @gabrielhenson5751 Год назад +6

      @@notaulgoodman9732 stick 2 arsenal birds together in tandem and make it a passenger craft.

    • @TornaitSuperBird
      @TornaitSuperBird 9 месяцев назад

      @@gabrielhenson5751Gleipnir but with a full-service buffet and a gym instead of a shock cannon

  • @richmay56
    @richmay56 Год назад +35

    Kinda interested if we can make in this game airships from Project Wingman now (just like their overall concept even as "Aerial cruise ship" more that this)

    • @mill2712
      @mill2712 Год назад +3

      Look up the box wing design. In fact, it's possible the double wing design you see in that game could be the next evolution in civil aviation.

  • @beeengineer
    @beeengineer Год назад +52

    Due to the fact that on the flyout discord there is a lot of helicopters is the weekly build submissions and the only other things on it are from these videos, I think M-82's next vid will be about helicopters.

  • @shiyian
    @shiyian Год назад +36

    I like how youtube thinks that flyout is x plane 11.

    • @AnythingButaGoofball
      @AnythingButaGoofball Год назад +15

      i like how youtube just doesnt know what flyout is and just panics and throws in either Ksp, war thunder or x plane 11

    • @CWINDOWSsystem32
      @CWINDOWSsystem32 3 месяца назад +1

      In his more recent videos, RUclips now does know about Flyout, but thinks it's a game from 2007. 💀

  • @GabrielOfTheeInferno
    @GabrielOfTheeInferno Год назад +8

    i suppose, with the pool, you could dual purpose the water to circulate through the shields to both act as a neutron attenuator and to sterilize the pool water, and if you just physically filtered it, you could probably get away with no chlorine too.
    If youre going to bring the weight along, put it to use.

  • @dustycarrier4413
    @dustycarrier4413 Год назад +3

    A blended wing design makes much more sense for this imo.

  • @casematecardinal
    @casematecardinal Год назад +7

    The wing loading would be astronomical. But if we are designing this, I think adding more dihedral would help make this sky boat have a turning circle somewhat less than the distance between Dallas and Fort worth.

  • @TheTrytix
    @TheTrytix Год назад +9

    Now the actual illustration made for this beast was interesting to look at already, but whatever you conjured up looks ever BETTER! I welcome our new skycruise plane overlord that you've designed. It looks magnificent! ^^

  • @darkofthearmy
    @darkofthearmy Год назад +7

    Amazing vid, keep up the great work!

  • @TankswillRule
    @TankswillRule Год назад +2

    Also forgot to mention how loud nuclear engines are. They would literally blast all windows in every airport

  • @isaacm1929
    @isaacm1929 Год назад +2

    Now you should make a Aerial Aircraft Carrier, big, expensive, shitty, and very fun (engineers not included in the fun).
    Also, wouldn't be a better idea to use eletric turbines, powered by a nuclear reactor?

  • @ryanc00p3r3
    @ryanc00p3r3 11 месяцев назад

    Messier 82: Come onboard the sky cruiser aircraft.
    Mr.Missile Guided System: Oh hey look a Civilian Airliner.
    Commencing "Try not to shoot down a Civilian Airliner challenge"

  • @irisholigarch316
    @irisholigarch316 Год назад

    Another banger video brother, keep em coming!

  • @ZTrollface
    @ZTrollface Год назад +2

    the saddest part is some new outlets are saying that "oh germans are thinking of building this plane in like 20 years1!111!" but we all know that its just a picture an artist made to look cyberpunk

  • @lafollette4223
    @lafollette4223 Год назад

    Great job! Really appreciate such a good content in our small community

  • @henrycooper3431
    @henrycooper3431 Год назад

    I love this design, a good job well done mate.

  • @Fergusius
    @Fergusius 11 месяцев назад

    What an amazing looking monstrosity :D I'm in love! I can't wait for this game to come out - always wanted to tinker around airplane designs :)

  • @thatcringyplaneguy
    @thatcringyplaneguy Год назад

    Love this video. Earned my subscription

  • @scatmanpro
    @scatmanpro Год назад

    Always happy when you upload!!

  • @superme_pl898
    @superme_pl898 Год назад +1

    Pool on the plane:😄
    Turbulence:🌚

  • @z3iro383
    @z3iro383 Год назад

    I'm just glad you made it so the landing gear actually retracts

  • @rexosed6996
    @rexosed6996 Год назад +1

    The concept art was never meant to be real, it's just a drawing, but the media thought it could be real and that it's a real concept for a flying ship.

  • @asdf-qg7df
    @asdf-qg7df Год назад +1

    this chad single-handedly carried a game that nobody knows from a well known game

  • @cylerner
    @cylerner Год назад +1

    I have seen a few plane designs with observation decks, but they are always on the top of the plane. I've always thought it'd be a bit cooler if they were on the bottom so you could see the ground below you as you flew over the world. Maybe even a small area with a thick glass bottom so you can stand on it and look down at your feet.

  • @asomewhatrussianbear422
    @asomewhatrussianbear422 Год назад

    I can’t think of a single customer for such a concept. At best you wont’t notice you’re flying, but then there’s the downside of not being able to get outside.
    Just an infinitely more expensive and worse resort.

  • @PointyHairedJedi
    @PointyHairedJedi Год назад

    This thing would be a good setting for a 70's style disaster movie...

  • @splits3c0nd29
    @splits3c0nd29 9 месяцев назад

    One thing I felt should've changed from the beginning is that the design used was akin to something like a 747. The better way to go about this would have been to use a blended wing design, which would help to maximize lift and effenciency while also providing a huge amount more space to allow facilities you'd expect to find on a cruise ship, among other things. It'd also allow it to cruise at lower speeds which would enable passengers to enjoy the onboard entertainment for a longer duration of a trip.

  • @therealtony2009
    @therealtony2009 Год назад +6

    i would definitely go on one of these, if it was stable

  • @hamsteak5013
    @hamsteak5013 Год назад

    tbh, if you think about it, we totally could have feasible flying cruise ships in the form of airships like blimps and zeppelins. It's just a matter of easing people's fears of it catching on fire and blowing up.

  • @kaede795
    @kaede795 Год назад +6

    now the real question, how good would it be if converted into an Airborne warning and Control System Aircraft?

    • @bilge677
      @bilge677 Год назад +3

      6 terawatt radar, melts anything that gets within 300 miles of it

    • @bluenightfury4365
      @bluenightfury4365 Год назад +5

      Would certainly be a powerful airborne radar platform that'd be for sure.

    • @kjj26k
      @kjj26k Год назад +4

      Talk about a big freaking target though.

    • @DARTHNECRION
      @DARTHNECRION 10 месяцев назад +1

      It would make an AEGIS destroyer look like a nearsighted naked mole-rat. lol

  • @CircaSriYak
    @CircaSriYak Год назад +2

    "This thing literally weighed as much as the average skyscraper. The difference is this thing had wings and wheels and jet engines."
    Meanwhile in an alternate timeline:
    the world trade center is in the sky and its coming for you

  • @charlesmurphy5644
    @charlesmurphy5644 Год назад

    Have you ever watched a 90’s cartoon called Talespin? If you want to use nuclear energy, wouldn’t a reactor generating electricity that would power electric turbofans be a more efficient design? That way you wouldn’t need the ducting from reactor to wings just some heavy duty conductors. An ekranoplan might deal with the weights and offer a lot more places to land and better a nuclear reactor crashes in the ocean than on takeoff or landing at a terrestrial runway. Love the video, your wing design is very up to date or I guess near futuristic!

  • @audiobotguy0357
    @audiobotguy0357 Год назад +1

    A note, the pic shown in the intro isn't actually supposed to be real, or accurate, and is simply just Scifi art that someone made. It was just used for clickbait by big media.
    Btw, great video! The build turned out very nice looking!

  • @beyondhorizons10
    @beyondhorizons10 Год назад

    Love your videos! But could u maybe do a landing with these great aircrafts? that would be a fullfilling ending :)

  • @bluewhalestudioblenderanim1132

    I like that you De-Janked what is escentialy a "Meme_Plane" :D
    it's undestandable and somewhat educational about the challenges of aircraft design . . but at the same time it's also kinda funny . . even whan redesigned , this is still rudiculous design . that's worthy of it's own meme

  • @tehKap0w
    @tehKap0w Год назад

    The observation deck belongs on the belly of the plane, there's more to look at down there.

  • @Dovoline3
    @Dovoline3 Год назад

    It honestly might make more sense to make this a dedicated seaplane. 3000 tons is a hell of a lot for a ground vehicle, and unless you're making the entire bottom out of wheels then you're never spreading out the ground pressure enough to not just destroy whatever runway you land on... and even if you did do that... your odds still ain't great. Stopping is an issue too.
    On the other hand, 3000 tons is a perfectly normal, and if anything somewhat light weight for an oceangoing vessel. You won't have to worry about destroying the runway, nor about stopping or having enough runway to take back off.
    3000 tons also seems a bit light, I think you might have vastly underestimated how much the nuclear engines would weigh. But I'm not a nuclear engineer, so don't take my word for it.

  • @cankill4209
    @cankill4209 10 месяцев назад +1

    the pool when there is air turbulence

  • @GoodluckCodfishing
    @GoodluckCodfishing Год назад

    Give this guy the lead concept engineer position at Boeing IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!!

  • @resonance314
    @resonance314 Год назад

    Great work, i would love to see some huge ace combat inspired stuff, like a flying wing aircraft carrier.

  • @jwandel
    @jwandel Год назад

    What a cool looking game. It seems right up my alley. Great graphics too. Hopefully it's well optimized.

  • @eekee6034
    @eekee6034 Год назад

    It's a relief to see this becoming sleeker than the _thing_ shown at the beginning! That was an uncreative monstrosity which looked like it flies by bludgeoning its way through the air with sheer raw power! But the finished plane turned out very nicely indeed. :) ... Where can a book tickets? :D
    The "monstrosity" is, I think, the largest airplane concept I've ever seen, but seeing it brought back to mind another huge flying cruise ship; a design made in the 40s or 50s by a real, if highly creative, aircraft engineer. It was mostly (but not entirely) an enormous flying wing with 2 decks in the center of the wing, a bridge above the wing and an incredible pair of bulbous, many-decked fuselages below. 1 of the wing decks extended to each edge, featuring observation lounges at both ends, but they didn't have such huge glass domes; merely large windows for the 40s. I apologise for the lack of a name; search engines, youtube, Wikipedia and my own notes have all, surprisingly, failed me.

  • @GovernmentFails
    @GovernmentFails 8 месяцев назад

    what if its unpressurized and flys at no more than 10k ft? solves the glass issue also would have a lower speed by necessity reducing engine size and forces on the wings. do flying boats work in flyout? it might be easier to take this to existing cruise ship ports since those are destination anyway

  • @bernardputersznit64
    @bernardputersznit64 Год назад

    very nice indeed - only ding is that the rapid rotations are more disorienting than a fully developed spin ;-)

  • @WarFish_Sardini
    @WarFish_Sardini Год назад

    Doing a flyby on the ATC tower with this must be awesome LMAO

  • @bliglum
    @bliglum Год назад

    Always thought a rigid airship/aircraft hybrid could make for a good sky cruise liner concept. Huge, with an airport and a few observation decks up top, cabins and amenities below..
    Helium offsetting half to 2/3's the weight, the rest through aerodynamic lift. Perhaps driven with solid state, electric, ion propulsion. And of course, the entire ship would be amphibious, so that it could land in the ocean if need be.

  • @adamackley4165
    @adamackley4165 Год назад

    So, another vid, I’m American so when this was posted was 2 am, but, another great vid!

  • @Dazzle_Novak_
    @Dazzle_Novak_ Год назад

    -pools
    -45 degrees rotation
    reminded me of that scene from passengers with 0g in pool

  • @timobensch3904
    @timobensch3904 Год назад

    a pool in a plane, what a great idea! :D

  • @gabrielmirandahurtado6539
    @gabrielmirandahurtado6539 Год назад

    I remember seeing that giant aircraft before, it was in r/wordbuilding, the creator wanted to test out some silly concept art of a nuclear powered sky cruise, and as he was busy with other projects at that time he didn't really rig the aircraft to function

  • @liamhamm8591
    @liamhamm8591 10 месяцев назад

    I love your ideas for traditional nuclear powered aircraft. But what would an aircraft powered by nuclear fusion look like? Nuclear fusion has been making headway in the science industry, and has capability to put off way more power and basically last forever aside from parts because no radiation half life. Not nearly as heavy either (theoretically because the one we’re building in france is massive but will theoretically put off more power than a traditional reactor of that size)

  • @yerp1554
    @yerp1554 Год назад +1

    I was just thinking about this thing holy

  • @thisperson2963
    @thisperson2963 Год назад

    Imagine how much you’d have to pay those pilots because the aircraft is so unique and you would have to train them for take off landing docking and emergency procedures.

  • @gmms7963
    @gmms7963 Год назад

    i think one of the small changes of your design could be the change of the conventional vertical stabilizer (the giant "fin" of the aircraft), to an twin tail (like used in the an 225) or even multiple ones (like in the e2 hawkeye), since their function is to improve maneurability while maintaining a smaller size, wich in return, make it easier to maintain or even store the aircraft in an hangar (wich one idk lmao)
    other than that, your design is incredible! While you tried to maintain some aspects of the original version, you streamlined it to become more possible (unfortunely both designs would have to use completely new materials to even fly without landing due to maintaince in order to avoid corrosion, and other problems)
    tldr: great improvement (althought it would be ineffective anyways due to anti-corrosion maintaince), and you could add a twin or more tail design
    fun fact: flying carriers actually did exist, however, it was used in zeppelins and bombers, with the idea abandoned due to the dangers of "landing" on a mother ship, althought there are projects of parasite drones

  • @t1t0s89
    @t1t0s89 Год назад

    Had a question, wouldn't engines be safer closer to the wing/fuselage junction as opposed to further out? lol, I know this is a joke aircraft but just asking for your opinion.

  • @sacopanchez151
    @sacopanchez151 Год назад +2

    I wonder if it is or will be possible in the game to design airborne aircraft carriers like the Aigaion from Ace Combat 6 or the Banshees from Yukikaze.

  • @spyroXcynder1000
    @spyroXcynder1000 Год назад +1

    I'd hate to feel the turbulence on the plane flying behind this XD

  • @williamknows3908
    @williamknows3908 Год назад +2

    Investing in this video before it blows up

  • @SectorCTestLabs
    @SectorCTestLabs Год назад

    That looks MUCH better than the original design. The original looked like it would start spinning if you even dared to pitch up lol

  • @sharp_ant4651
    @sharp_ant4651 Год назад

    What is the website you to make airplanes?

  • @SinamonSticc
    @SinamonSticc Год назад

    Can we get a full clip of the takeoff and landing?

  • @netherman1325
    @netherman1325 Год назад

    Actually I quite like the Areal cruise ship plane, not the actual thing but the metaphor behind it. The whole idea is a fake concept created by someone on reddit, for a subreddit called r/worldbuilding. It was never meant to be real, this was just something that they worked on for fun or for a school project. However people began doing what they do best by spreading misinformation about the plane to wherever they could. Somehow a couple major news outlets saw these posts online about this plane being a "real concept", didn't look into it any further, and made news stories about the damn thing.

  • @JameisonAus_YouTube
    @JameisonAus_YouTube Год назад

    something else with the observation deck is that i think in the 3d render they made for it the windows are very tall and square
    so how strong is this when you need to keep standard air pressure while above/in the northern lights
    im sure it would shatter all the large panes if they were not strong not to mention being not areodynamic as having no sharp wind facing edges increasing pressure on that disk

  • @teedal7203
    @teedal7203 Год назад +1

    Honestly I think a flying wing would be the best design for something this huge

  • @justar2673
    @justar2673 Год назад +1

    bro you deserve more likes

  • @oliverandom6808
    @oliverandom6808 2 месяца назад

    Hey man, as a KSP player this game looks so fucking cool and I can't wait to try it out. Good work!

    • @messier82ac
      @messier82ac  2 месяца назад +1

      Thank you! It's a very enjoyable game, and as an over 2k hour KSP player, it fills in the niche of aviation building far better. Although for rockets, I still love playing KSP from time to time! Currently making a video on a 300 ton Laythe spaceplane.
      Something to note: The game is in fact in early access, and lacks a lot of features at the moment, but the dev is hard at work!

  • @dallenbaldwin3484
    @dallenbaldwin3484 10 месяцев назад

    Proof that actual sky cruises will be slow moving Zeppelins

  • @Erbmon
    @Erbmon Год назад

    Dang most pilots operate well over the recomended radiation limit/year, imagin having to sleep there to boot, honestly the nuclear motors is probablly the safest part of flying for such prolonged timeframes.

  • @gafrers
    @gafrers 2 месяца назад

    Lovely and crazy

  • @EnderiumSmith
    @EnderiumSmith Год назад

    from what ive found nuclear engines have limited power so you cant have both payload and shielding. this could be solved by putting the engine directly inline and use shadow shielding to block the line of sight. boarding would be tricky since you have to stay within the narrow cone of safety and the taxiway would become increasingly more radioactive as the unshielded reactor sprays neutrons all over it.

  • @fe4rmemrwickyt_796
    @fe4rmemrwickyt_796 Год назад

    one major flaw with the flying cruise ship idea, is that turbulence exists

  • @phoenixtalon100
    @phoenixtalon100 Год назад

    Something this large and heavy likely would not be able to launch or land from any airfield or airport both due to it's size and weight. Making it a flying boat would probably be the only way it could work.

  • @malusignatius
    @malusignatius Год назад +2

    Everything about this concept makes me think of that quote from Jurassic Park about 'spending so much time worrying if you could, that you never stopped to think about if you should...' Don't get me wrong, seeing such a ludicrous design in a game or in fiction's fun, but the idea someone might be mad enough to think about building it in real life makes me sad, truth be told. It would be such a waste to see so much get poured into essentially a vanity project (assuming it works of course).
    Also where would the reactors for the nuclear engines be located? Because if they're in the engine pods, that raises a huge number of issues. Heck, if it's one big one in the fuselage, that also raises a huge number of (somewhat different) issues.

    • @rodrigolefever2426
      @rodrigolefever2426 Год назад

      Its anot a real plane the plane comes from a scifi reddit post and people tought it was real

  • @mr.pineapple7620
    @mr.pineapple7620 Год назад

    The amount of radiation you'd get from being up high for that long alone oof

  • @joecrisp9060
    @joecrisp9060 Год назад

    Bro, I wonder how well you could integrate the observation deck into the t-tail? Thicken it up a bit and add windows in the leading edges? Id b one of the people to go up there just to see the whole plane lol.

  • @generalseal6948
    @generalseal6948 Год назад

    I actually had a similar concept a few years ago a luxury airship that functions like a cruise ship or airborne hotel

  • @DatBoi-sl1rw
    @DatBoi-sl1rw Год назад +4

    Imagine the ammount of ice that would form on the wings

    • @davisdf3064
      @davisdf3064 Год назад +1

      Clear the ice and send it to the polar caps to refurbish them!

  • @Physics69
    @Physics69 Год назад

    What does the Toe setting do?

  • @gwenmcgarry528
    @gwenmcgarry528 Год назад

    what about a massive flying wing or blended body design, would that wotk better?

  • @BeansAndWeens
    @BeansAndWeens Год назад

    technically speaking, a sky cruise ship was already done, See the example of the H4 Hercules a massive flying boat.

  • @starbishop4916
    @starbishop4916 Год назад

    Honestly, it would probably work better as a flying boat. Trying to find a runway big enough for this thing to slow down much less launch let alone landing gear capable of supporting this behemoth would be almost impossible.
    On the other hand, a flying boat design means the weight is distributed across the entire surface of the ventral surface of the plane while large bodies of water would be more available. The plane would be heavier from needing to reinforce the structure for a water landing but I think it would still be a better option than trying to find/build and maintain runways around the world to land this monster on.
    Plus it also adds the attraction of being able to take passengers to popular water-accessible tourist spots. The Bahamas today, tomorrow Venice and the Mediterranean and then on to Okinawa.

  • @megan00b8
    @megan00b8 Год назад +1

    Can it land tho? What's the length of the runway it took to get up?

    • @messier82ac
      @messier82ac  Год назад

      Takes about 2.8km of runway to get off the ground, takes about 2.5 to land

  • @trainanimator8150
    @trainanimator8150 Год назад +2

    Can a video be “can chat got design a close air support aircraft”

  • @captaincritter1898
    @captaincritter1898 Год назад

    Imagine flying this big boy into the one world trade centre 😍

  • @asteroid0987
    @asteroid0987 Год назад

    Imagine actually landing it though, it would take HOURS to get this thing on the ground safely, everyone would have to sit on seats.

  • @Kserks96
    @Kserks96 Год назад +1

    You can probably launch moon mission rocket from this thing

  • @supapoopatroopa6882
    @supapoopatroopa6882 Год назад

    I don’t know how no one mentioned the pool would be unusable unless flying directly straight as turning would cause it to spill everywhere (unless there’s some fancy aerodynamics stuff idk about)

  • @nemthefearless
    @nemthefearless 11 месяцев назад

    If it's only job is to sightsee and stay airborne, you could sacrifice speed to get better field performance. No wing sweep, heck biplane or tandem wing so long as that doesn't cost lift/drag ratio at loiter speeds, and such designs might be structurally easier. Or even blended wing, though that'd be tough build in game. You could also forgo pressurisation and have bigger windows since sightseeing is better at lower levels, but this means you cant fly over bad weather or mountains. Compromise, have a cylindrical pressurized part which passengers must retreat to on such occasions ?