I think they're just still salty after losing the Civil War. They don't want US Citizens fighting their tyranny so they figure, if we're not armed, we wouldn't be able to fight back.
@@jwg-dawg4436 The way i hear it from people i know who are anti 2a is that restrictions aren't the same as banning outright. Same kind of people who believe that free speech is fine... Until they're offended 🤦🏾♂️
@@robinmarks1710 because it is, or was, widely believed that once a felon always a felon. Unfortunately for many that is the case. But there should be some kind of pathway for those who maybe did something stupid when they were young, but have not gotten into any major trouble for some time, to be able to repeal that lifetime ban. At least that is what I believe. A lot of people take issue with me over that one.
@MilitaryBronyforlife you need to look past political titles and pay attention to their votes and what's going on within their party. Both parties are terrible, but at least one still cares about America. When I hear someone say they're a Democrat in this day and age I scratch my head. I used to think I was a Democrat, until I started digging and searching for who believes and fights for what I belive.
Beretta Road Chronicles you notice that too, it is not just the anti-2A Democrats also it is anti-gun people who get their info about guns from movie. I know, I seen that first hand, everything they say about guns and gun fights are things I have seen in movies and I am a person who has had weapons training.
Her family should have sued the State Government for negligence. Especially if she had a restraining order. They failed to protect her and infringed upon her right to protect herself.
@@Cayenne420 Supreme Court has ruled the Police have no duty to protect citizens in other cases. They would just cite those decision and be done with it unless you were able to get it appealed and heard by the Supreme Court. A long expensive prospect with no guarantee.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bare arms, shall not be infringed." If you want to ban specific types of rifles, you are anti-2A, because banning specific rifles is infringement.
@@mikwhsjs7972 Demonic-rat? The Godless Left... sits at "the left hand of GOD? Marx was a Satanist. Alinsky, who wrote their bible "Rules for Radicals" credits Satan for the inspiration of his book, right in the forward. Coincidence?
The fact that people believe they are ignorant of what they are doing is terrifying. Their goal is to intentionally disarm the citizens. World history will tell you what comes next
Center Extremist I would argue we already have reasonable legislation. I think there is actually a lot of unreasonable legislation that needs to be repealed
@@andrewhill1251 .......any legislation is rendered irrelevant by the 2nd Amendment, ...nothing can supersede the 2nd Amendment. The US Constitution is supreme. The 2nd can only be modified by a Constitutional Convention, ...and chances of that are slim and none. Many of the gun laws already on the book are technically unconstitutional. The Court doesn't see safety issues or laws to prevent convicted felons from gun ownership as an infringement, but those laws are already on the books.
You have no idea how much the media is controlled or works along side the DNC. I can go back decades with movies and media making out right lies about guns. They would literally try to attack his family. Like they did to Tucker Carlson.
It is tyranny at this point. The problem is we have a whole party dedicated to lying to the American people about why we need the 2nd amendment, and why we need guns to protect ourselves. It's the wolves telling the sheep they don't need sheepdogs anymore, and the sheep are falling for it.
.......well said, ....in for a penny, in for a pound. It's all about the US Constitution, ....if they disagree with it, ...I'm sure there is some Socialist/Communist/Marxist nation who would be glad to have them as subjects. I hear Ghana will take anyone seeking to relocate, I wouldn't be against using US resources to help them move.
@@matthewarnold4557 well the thing actually is, unconstitutional revisionist "scholars" started trying to destroy the Constitution a little over century ago. The Framers made it clear and the Federalist papers confirm it. We the people have the right to bare arms and form militias.
Here's the video: ruclips.net/video/vlPtCCrp9EY/видео.html Thanks to NJ2AS i got my permit within 55 days, i know people waiting over 4 months! NJ sucks!
En1gma 2u same here i been waiting since July 12 in NJ. Just a couple months ago i got 3 handgun permits. It came through 2 months later. I had one more I purchased so I needed a permit and did it July 12. Still waiting, u can contact the detective handling the paperwork to give you an estimate and as of a few weeks ago he told me 1 to 2 more months wait. They are processing new fid applicants faster though. Returning applicants are screwed.
Yes absolutely, there intelligent wisdom was I believe given by almighty GOD, that understood what it would take to keep a Nation together until the second coming of our savior . .
The hunting topic should not even be in the conversation when we talk about the 2nd ammendment, at all. No where in the 2nd amendment says anything about hunting. It was not written for hunting. It was written to protect our freedoms from politicians and government/state/city tyranny. It was also written for self preservation.
Please consider reading my message here I just posted. I have valid visual proofs and printed proofs of everything within the content of that message. This cabal behind this revolt are the free Masonic Scottish rights sect who follow the teachings of Albert Pike.
Just goes to show their blindness. when I am out hunting for my dinner and I miss 3 times and I go hungry because you think I shouldn't be allowed to have 100 attempts. This isn't a sporting event this is life or death and these people sitting up in their palaces who have others go out hunting for them, don't need to concern themselves with what the peasants need to do.
Ouch... Wonder if it was the governor or the judge. Oh well Colion just said judge. The only ones I'd consider are the ones that can shoot 454 casull as well as 45 colt/410
If Biden wins then it would only be fair to only allow one double-barreled shotgun to be used for Biden’s protection by the secret service member of his choice. When those shells are spent, fired into the air as warning shots of course, then that agent can then tell Biden that he should have voted for a different candidate for president.
@@itsjustme8135 that politicians believe their lives are more valuable then someone just working their butts off every day of the week is sickening. Leaders of countries that claim freedom have forgotten who their boss is. We are not supposed to serve them, they are supposed to serve us
Well, there are some nice shotguns out there and they will certainly get the home defense job done in 99% of situations. I’m all for owning whatever you want but a good shotgun isnt anything to be scoffed at. A 500 grain slug going at 1600 fps will kill most anything on earth within a certain range.
@@donaldmack2307 Love shotguns, have a ton. I just hate the hypocrisy of someone that is surrounded by full auto PDWs telling me that’s all I can have to defend myself. The same chud that whines incessantly about climate change but gets on a private plane to got to a rally with 6 people. I’m over it.
@@donaldmack2307 Its not that a shottie wouldn't be good, its that he has no right to tell me what I NEED. I know what I NEED to defend MYSELF, not Dementia Joe who can't even remember what office he's running for at any given moment. Also the fact that its the Bill of RIGHTS, not the Bill of Needs
@@griffdocta Defund would essentially render police useless, so disband isn't that far off. Also, they said disband and defund, and people have called for the entire removal of police, so nothing they said was wrong.
@@griffdocta Considering the New York Times published a multi-page article detailing how "yes, Defund the Police means to completely disband the police", I'd say it's pretty clear what they mean.
@@kelaarin No. Defund, meaning to keep the police doing what they do BUT to redirect some of the funds they recieve and use those funds to hire other ancillary staff that can help deal with people with mental illness. We ask our police to do so much and often, they're put in unfortunate situations. Police are trained to uphold the law, and most do a reasonable job. It might benefit society if we also had people trained to deal with mental health issues accompany the officers on calls where mental illness may be the source for the call. This won't solve all the problems surrounding police but it could be a constructive step on the right direction. So, defund in that sense....NOT DISBAND.....we need the police and what they do for our society.
As an independent, I'd rather vote for a used condom than a democrat ever again. They were so set in getting rid of Trump, no matter the cost, that they have actually just turned a lot of people away from their party. Plainly and simply put. But when you steal elections, wtf do you need votes for, right?
@@natoist4889 I'm a Libertarian who always votes for freedom, so I've never once ever voted Democrat which means I have always had to vote Republican just to protect our freedoms even if I disagree with their other platforms.
COVID highlighting that, as one Democrat ignored their own travel bans etc. as us peasants sat at home. Sad most are too stupid to see how corrupt they are.
"you don't need an AR-15 to take down a deer unless you plan on using 6.5 Grendel... in which case you'll likely need an AR-15 as no other rifle is chambered in 6.5 Grendel"
Crenshaw is a rino. He may shoot well, but he’s not on our side. TAPS, Redflag. And this is coming from a Purple Heart Infantryman. Most of us vets can’t stand that dude.
Biggest problem is he's a black man supporting 2A. This is the democrats biggest fear. Trump support increased in 2022 election amongst especially black men and Hispanics at an alarming rate. They will downplay and say it wasn't that much but don't let them fool you. The Hispanic vote is freaking them out & they feel they're losing their 70+ year stranglehold on black Americans. When I was growing up there was only thomas Sowell and a couple more black men that spoke like this and were on the right. There were more but no way in hell would they speak out but now I'm seeing black men and woman everywhere in #s I never thought possible. Kanye west crazy but even he spoke out & mentioned Thomas Sowells name. That's crazy and it would take a wild man to say this in public. . Jim Brown stuck w him knowing there could be consequences & I barely heard anyone calling him the typical racist slurs usually used in these cases. You have a real problem when a black man that has this much respect in black community from the civil rights mvt and actually helping inner cities stands by Trump. Mike Tyson. Dennis Rodman, Floyd Mayweather & a whole lot more when Trump first announced until they basically destroyed anyone or tried to destroy any of them that didn't get in line. Notice how the ones that stuck by him are the realest and baddest no fear type black dudes around. A lot more feel the same but don't have courage to say it, yet. This is what's behind the insane move left by democrats with literally everything is racist,, Reparations, equity and every other scheme they're trying to buy off the black community with. They are evil but dsmn good at what they do. Manipulate and destroy. It's pathetic and will only make it much worse for 90+% of black Americans. Murder in these communities are already dramatically rising off idiotic policies the democrats have been pushing for last few years. 3500 more black men murdered than at this point last year. Was June when I read this stat.
@@kevinodom2918 Damn, that was quite a read... But I agree with everything you mentioned. It's unfortunate (and pathetic) that race still plays such a major a part in politics. Colion articulates my concerns better than I do. I just wish his common sense perspectives were made known to people who are not just anti-2a, but anti-AR-15 (specifically). Legislators seem COMPLETELY ignorant about guns, yet they make laws we must follow.
When they wrote the constitution there were civilians that had the most advanced weapons of war sitting in their front yard. The common man was just as heavily armed as the military. The second amendment is not about hunting.
Back in the days of private cannon ownership, and when repeating rifles were too expensive for the government to equip the military with so all examples we privately owned, so the best guns were owned by private citizens. Yep, 2A was about the citizenry being able to resist the government and counter tyranny, and it's a shame that culture has forgotten that.
It’s funny too that people will point out that nobody can fight the military cause they’re too advanced, but have they forgotten everything going on in the Middle East the past 20 years. I mean those are just a bunch of guys with Toyota Tacoma’s and AK-47s and yet they’re able to put up a fight
If you read the other writings of the time, the Founders were very wary of standing armies. They feared that a standing army could be used to run over the citizens. So their you need to be in the "militia" argument is BS also.
@@NerdCoding An ar 15 is not a gun?Smh. Lemme guess, its about gender being fluid, somehow? A mole hill? Freedom must be a joke to you. I bet you support Dictator Biden bypassing Congress and the People with Executive Orders.
This is the first time I’ve seen one of your videos. I don’t know about the rest of them but the power of your logic and your presentation on this topic is amazing.
@@INoIFearIGaming not shortly after but rather immediately. They're already working on it. People don't realize that socialism does not come with rights included
Colion....well, I can't say it any better than you did. You have a true gift being able to dissect their point of view and counter with common sense. Please, never give up on this. We need you!
Democrats will let BLM keep their guns and provide them with more. It's Everybody else they don't want having firearms. Where do you think all the ammo is going ? Soros, Bloomberg and all their Marxist/communist groups are buying it all up to keep it out of our hands.
"There was no such thing as an ar 15 back in the day" Uhhhh ya but cannons? Private ships with 40 of them? Ever heard of privateers? Wow these people are insufferable.
You’re forgetting about the pepper hangin that shot multiple shots with one trigger fire. If the NFA existed back in those times that gun would’ve been under the NFA and liberals will be calling it an assault weapon
Yeah that's why it doesn't say muzkeloader rifles and handguns, it's meant to be timeless and took up with what's current.at the time. If anything we should be able to buy a stinger shoulder fired middle, and according to the Constitution we can. I don't know what's so hard to understand about shall not be infringed. ARMS means any weapon, without exception, it's pretty clear. If someone wanted a fighter jet,.they should be able to buy that too.
@Booge Nautilus I doubt it, why use an inferior weapon? It's a 22 with a little more powder, that is it. I don't see that being mounted in numbers, no they would use something more like 4 M60 machine guns I'll wager.
@SESolutionsEngineering I get what you are saying, however keep.on mind even an M60 machine gun is crew served weapon and takes at least 2 people to field more when you count ammo and not just the tripod and extra barrel. Also, I would like to point out that a war ship or submarine isn't an individual weapon either, and so is a tank not, but we can own battle tanks right now. ARMS does in fact cover everything as per definition at the time it was written.
ive yet to meet a Dem in NJ that was against anything 2a, infact prob 40% of the members at my range are Dems. but i guess its just easier to use blanket statements on millions of people lol. even though if you combine dems and independents they make up more than 50% of actual gun ownership lol. Saying Dems are anti gun is like saying Catholics are pedos. JK one of those is actually true and its not the first statement.
Started following your channel a few months ago and totally support your cause. As an AF Veteran I'm in full support of the 2A and supporting your cause.
This guy was projecting so hard when he said republicans repeat that the dems are anti-2A so much that people believe it. That's their favorite tactic. Nevermind the fact that there is an abundance of evidence in the form of laws that prove how anti-2A the dems as a whole are.
Just your local Democrat here: I think we have a different definition of what Anti-2A means. We don't consider certain gun laws to be anti-2a anymore than you'd consider deformation suits or restrictions on religious practices (like laws that say no human sacrifices) anti-1a. I think theres a very big disconnect in our definitions which doesn't seem entirely solvable without sitting down and talking stuff out. I'm not sure if anyone else saw it but Obama did answer a 2a question back in 2014(?) where he basically conveyed this idea. He said, paraphrasing, "I don't want to take the guns of any responsible gun owners, like you, but when I have my defense advisors meet with me and point out that we've put several more people on no-fly lists because they are active ISIL sympathizers, it makes us mad. These people are legitimate threats but we can't stop them from getting guns because the NRA and other organizations won't even let the CDC do studies on the effects of guns and gun violence". There are many Democrats who are anti-2A, I'll give you that, but I know more Democrats who aren't and just want meaningful solutions to gun violence. Not just talking about fixing gun violence and mass shootings but follow through on the solutions. Nothing erked me more than when Republicans started calling mass shooters "a mental health problem not a gun problem" not because I didn't agree, in fact I do agree, but because I knew most Republicans were just deflecting. Most don't actually believe in funding mental health facilities or programs, they just want the discussion to end. They're like All Lives Matter, they made the statement but there's no following up.
@@DrArthurCGarp I believe all lives matter. Because I've never killed anyone. Never got a woman pregnant that wasn't my wife and made her get an abortion. Never had more than a speeding ticket. Is that following through enough for you?
I love how people say the founding fathers never intended for military grade weapons when they literally had privateers. In case you dont know what a privateer is they are a civilian who owned a modern day battleship of the era. So these people thought it was okay to own a modern war ship but not a rifle that shoot more than 5 bullets. These things had 20lb cannons that could shoot holes through an 8 foot fortified fort wall. I think they could care less about a rifle that can shoot 30 bullets.
Yeah some also had submarines early in this country, including the civil war. The south invented.the submarine and was the first to use it in naval combat against a war ship.
Umm he actually has multiple documented racist occurrences in his history. It is public knowledge . Strewn throughout most of his professional business dealings, he practiced discrimination more times than one can count actually. I'd say google that but you wont and then you will call it fake news hahahahh Drink the Kool Aid !
In the Navy, we often use “should”, “shall”, and “may/will be” to essentially distinguish the differences between a suggestion, a strong recommendation, and a downright requirement. “Shall” is a requirement. And therefore shall not means shall not.
The word "shall" is an imperative, by legal definition. Noah Webster was one of the founders, precisely because he'd just published the dictionary of American English language, and his dictionary was an official statement of legal language that continues in use today. I served two decades as a Marine, we used "legal language" to encode everything that was formal, required, and carefully used other language for "can, may, choose", things that are optional. Going into a court martial on an issue that is not laid out in formal law language, can't be prosecuted.
@@johnmcclain3887 Even in law school it is taught and even in government regulated bodies of other professions like accountancy have documents that use "shall" and define it as an imperative command, mandatory, non negotiable, and not permissive.
Democrat leadership: hell yes, we are gonna take your guns Non Democrats: they want to take our gun!!!!!! People vote democrat: I stand for the 2a and a lot of Democrats do. All the people with more then half a brain: then way the hell do you keep voting Democrat when your leadership don't think you should have guns. Leads me to think a lot of People in the democrat party don't even know what and who they are voting for they just vote because they where told that the democratic party has there best interests in mind.
You do know the current administration actually banned something through executive order. Also Ronald Reagan is the reason you can’t just go purchase Assault Rifles. He also implemented 2A restrictions as California governor. So stop with the BS republicans done more damage to my rights than anyone
Proud Englewood what did they ban through executive order? Also the democrats have openly talked about taking them away. Not sure where you hear your news, but no republican talks about taking away gun rights
Proud Englewood - Man - I didn’t realize Reagan was that powerful back in 1934. The NFA is why you cannot just “go out and buy an assault rifle”. More recently the pandemic and Biden have conspired to make it difficult to purchase any guns or ammo for those firearms.
FinnGames Knudson you obviously don’t know your history. The NFA didn’t ban the purchase of assault rifles or fully automatic weaponry. The NGA just made it where you had to pay a tax. In 1986 Reagan made it illegal for you to be able to buy them through gun dealers, distributors or the company itself and for new ones to be made for civilians. Go read up on it before blindly blaming a political side for 2A restrictions. Republicans are just as horrible. They had a majority and we got nothing
I hate people who talk about the framers of our country like they had any interest in hunters when they wrote the 2nd amendment. In that time hunting was a given! The purpose of the 2A is to stop people just like these people
@@kek397 If you could afford it. The framers did not want us to have a standing army. Able-bodied men from the age 17 is 76 was considered the militia. In most states you are still considered the militia under states constitutions.
@@warpedone3711 my point was that people think 2a is only for muskets, in reality it even allows you to own frigates ( the battleships of the time) for self defense, heck you can even acquire an entire navy if you can afford it. (Edit) Self defense includes against a tyrannical government.
@@kek397 The sad part about it they don't even teach the kids in school that is what the second amendment was about. They think it is something to do with hunting.
Bump Stock Ban- Donald Trump Full Auto Weapons ban- Ronald Regan California Concealed Carry crackdown- Governor Ronald Reagan in 1969 in response to armed protests by Black Panthers, NRA also supported it Assault Weapons ban- pushed by Bill Clinton SUPPORTED by Reagan Stop this nonsense. Republicans have passed more anti gun legislation in the past 50 years than any Democrat
I was talking bout that today 2 Democrats walked away. They didnt want to believe Obama used national guard on protesters, & Biden wants your guns.... I yelled, coming to a hood near you!!!
He is buying firearms. That means the gateway to knowledge is being opened. He will learn if he continues down this path. We should be seeking these people out and helping them learn. Especially when his mind is open.
"A weapon that contains a biological agent or toxin; or", unless you shoot lead-free, he's technically correct depending on the situation. "Lead is a highly toxic metal and a very strong poison."
@@BennyJackson101 I can't tell you how ALL gun laws will be affected, but I can you about a law that would affect guns and gun owners. Under this new bill, most will be banned. Biden said it will be one of his first motions as president to pass an "assault weapon" ban bill, which is already writtem, and is HIGHLY vague, basically covering everything that isn't a revolver, 10 round handgun, 4 round pump or break action shotgun, a bolt action, or mag fed .22's (not .223).
Same here! The Democratic party is anti-American. And the fact people that people who aren't far left socialists still vote for them blows my mind. Just today I saw a huge Biden sign in a front yard. Surrounding that sign were 3 blue lives matter signs and a thin blue line flag. And on the other side of the Biden sign, a gadsen flag with "dont tread on me" as big as could be. So confusing.
The quote is "Any people who would give up a little liberty ,for a little security , Will lose both and deserve neither" Also George Washington - "Fire ,like government is a useful servant , but a terrible master"......
@@markrenzella2825 actually Jacob is right. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Ben Franklin Washington didn't say this. It was written in a letter in 1755 by Franklin to the Colonial Governor.
VOTED IN VOTERS FORGOTTEN FOR A " POLITICAL AGENDA " THEIR " OATH OF OFFICE " TO " SUPPORT AND DEFEND " OUR " CONSTITUTION " " DERELICTION OF OFFICE " FOR SOME OF THEM ???
I’m genuinely concerned that people like him exist.....he literally said if you need a gun immediately oh well you can’t get it because you should’ve known before hand that you need a gun
...AND I bet you will never hear him say, to use your exact words, ...if you need an abortion it is because you should've know before hand that you needed birth control or a condom. lol Therefore he wants to restrict abortion procedures the same way a guns??
My brother when they try and take our rights away. You sir are who we need to fight in court for us. I for one will lead the money raising part for you. I'm a 60 year old disabled veteran with my weapons. These weapons are all a lot of us have to defend ourselves. I refuse to give up my weapon. You're an awesome young man keep up the fight sir!!!!
@@z31freakify - You'd lose on both points. Not only do I own a gun, I have my permit AND I live in the South. So once again, why does anybody NEED an M-16?
"The founders never envisioned these types of devastating modern weapons..." Ummm, ever seen what small cannon loaded with grapeshot does to a group of people?
@SESolutionsEngineering From what I've read, the Puckle Gun was never used in anything more than a "testing" or "experimental" manner. It was never used in any great numbers. Same goes for the Girandoni and the Nock Volley Gun. I may be mistaken, but that's what I have read. AFAIK, the Belton flintlock WAS a one off, but again, I may be mistaken. Even today, we have rifles and other weapons that are "futuristic", advanced, but evolutionary "dead ends", like the H&K caseless cartridge rifle, various other caseless cartridge firearms. Awesome idea, but a dead end at this time. Someday, they might get dusted off and inspire someone to create the next generation of firearms, but right now, there's just no market or interest for them.
The framers literally worked with guys like benjamin franklin; an inventor and one of the most important minds of all time Its insane that politicians act like men like him couldnt foresee what would come
@@TOAOM123 What is also mind boggling to me is they used the term ARMS, not muskets, not rifles, not pistols, but ARMS!! If I tell you to go to an ARMS dealer, what weapons are you thinking to see there???? Now as to the limit on 2A being like limits of free speech and you can't yell fire in a crowded movie theater....well, you can yell fire in a crowded movie theater and be called a hero if the movie theater is on fire, it is only when you fraudulently and maliciously with intent to cause harm and mayhem is it prevented. Much as it is ILLEGAL to wave guns around to cause fear and panic.....but you can still talk in a movie theater and you SHOULD be able to KEEP and BEAR ARMS....to own and carry weapons.
“Well, you shouldn’t have it because nobody NEEDS one of those!” - People have a lot of things they don’t NEED. We have a Bill Of RIGHTS in this country..... not a Bill Of NEEDS.
I have about 20 guns I don't need! Damn I just bought a 300 blk and don't need it. I wanted it and I'm a f$&king American that hasn't been arrested & blessed to have the right. I've served my country, I know what a gun can do to someone. I live with what I've seen and done. I'm not going to another country to fight for my country, only to come home where my family has to fear their own. I may sound like an ass, yet don't care. We all have that right. You carry your shotgun, he can feel bad b/c a bad guy carried a gun in a movie? Pussy! He can vote with my life and then vote to have my guns taken.
Here’s the actual quote “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."- Thomas Jefferson
Why Carry a Gun? -- A History Lesson! My old Granddad said to me, "Son, there comes a time in every man's life when he stops bustin' knuckles and starts bustin' caps and usually, it's when he becomes too old to take a whipping. I don't carry a gun to kill people; I carry a gun to keep from being killed. I don't carry a gun because I'm evil; I carry a gun because I have lived long enough to see the evil in the World. I don't carry a gun because I hate the government; I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government. I don't carry a gun because I'm angry; I carry a gun so that I don't have to spend the rest of my life hating myself for failing to be prepared. I don't carry a gun because I want to shoot someone; I carry a gun because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed and not on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon. I don't carry a gun to make me feel like a man; I carry a gun because men know how to take care of themselves and the ones they love. I don't carry a gun because I feel inadequate; I carry a gun because unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate. I don't carry a gun because I love it; I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful to me. Police protection is an oxymoron: Free citizens must protect themselves because police do not protect you from crime; they just come after something has happened, investigate the crime to see what happened, and then call someone in to clean up the mess. Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take a whoopin'! A LITTLE GUN HISTORY... BE SURE TO READ THIS... In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control: From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ----------------------- In 1911, Turkey established gun control: From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated ----------------------- Germany established gun control in 1938: From 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. ----------------------- China established gun control in 1935: From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ----------------------- Guatemala established gun control in 1964: From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ----------------------- Uganda established gun control in 1970: From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ----------------------- Cambodia established gun control in 1956: From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. ----------------------- 56 million defenseless people were rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control. ----------------------- You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens. With guns, we are 'citizens'; without them, we are 'subjects'. During WW II, the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED! Gun owners in the USA are the largest armed forces in the World! If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends. The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. SWITZERLAND ISSUES A GUN TO EVERY HOUSEHOLD. SWITZERLAND’S GOVERNMENT ISSUES AND TRAINS EVERY ADULT IN THE USE OF A RIFLE. SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!! IT'S A NO BRAINER! DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL law-abiding CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET. I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment! If you are too, please forward this. If you're not a believer, please reconsider based on these true facts. This is history; not what's being shown on TV, sanctioned by our illustrious delusional leaders in Washington.
Much as you may now want to hear this, it sounds like it's time to move to another state. Not just for the 2A and Gun Rights reasons either, but for most other reasons too.
This door buster is talking about common sense, yet, with all due respect, like Bloomberg, offer illiterate 2A arguments they should be embarrassed by. Unless they guarantee every legal gun owner the same 24/7 armed escort and bullet proof vehicle they enjoy the protection of, they should mind their own business. And since they wil never consider it, neither should we consider giving our means of self defense away.
Not just Demokkkrats but elitists as well. Remember how that Man-child "governor" Ted Wheeler had security escort him to the "mostly peaceful" protests? The same guy who bucked having Trump send in the national guard. Alyssa Milano's husband called 911 fairly recently when they heard gunshots near their property. It turned out to be a neighborhood kid with an airsoft gun. For thee but not for me!
Their silly, transparent attempt at subterfuge by constantly using "common sense" and "reasonable" when trying to push 2A infringements is evidence enough.
When the founders mentioned a militia, they meant every citizen. Every citizen was expected to be armed and stand and fight for the country, themselves and their neighbors.
@@jnywd8450 the AR-15 does look menacing to some, but remember the same holds true for the Glock. Just because it doesn't look as scary, doesn't mean it's less dangerous. A Glock 17 in the right hands is deadlier than an AR pattern rifle in most situations
Why Do People Think Democrats Are Anti-2A? Your Answer Below
Keep America Tactical
➡️ bit.ly/2lS44aM
Because they do nothing democrats and take away our gats.
They pick and choose what can be the 2a, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
You should reach out to them and get on The Breakfast Club to clarify.
I think they're just still salty after losing the Civil War. They don't want US Citizens fighting their tyranny so they figure, if we're not armed, we wouldn't be able to fight back.
People fear what they have no clue about
"I saw a gun in a movie and I want it so I can shoot unknown targets through a door."
What. The. Actual. F.
A Congressman, no less. Let him write "common sense" gun control laws.
I had the exact same thought.
That's how we lost silencers.
The real Twilight Zone.
Their level of cognitive dissonance is monumental
"Why do people think we're anti 2nd amendment? "
*proceeds to talk for 10 minutes about restricting firearms*
Ha! Exactly.
What gets me is that they can’t see it. ?!?!
@@jwg-dawg4436 The way i hear it from people i know who are anti 2a is that restrictions aren't the same as banning outright. Same kind of people who believe that free speech is fine... Until they're offended 🤦🏾♂️
Explain to me why a convicted felon can't buy a gun
@@robinmarks1710 because it is, or was, widely believed that once a felon always a felon. Unfortunately for many that is the case. But there should be some kind of pathway for those who maybe did something stupid when they were young, but have not gotten into any major trouble for some time, to be able to repeal that lifetime ban. At least that is what I believe. A lot of people take issue with me over that one.
Why is it when democrats talk about guns, their only knowledge comes from movies.
Because they want to control people and put fear in em.
MilitaryBronyforlife that is few and far between. If you come out of the military as a democrat then their is something wrong with you.
Don't forget video games.
@MilitaryBronyforlife you need to look past political titles and pay attention to their votes and what's going on within their party. Both parties are terrible, but at least one still cares about America.
When I hear someone say they're a Democrat in this day and age I scratch my head. I used to think I was a Democrat, until I started digging and searching for who believes and fights for what I belive.
Beretta Road Chronicles you notice that too, it is not just the anti-2A Democrats also it is anti-gun people who get their info about guns from movie. I know, I seen that first hand, everything they say about guns and gun fights are things I have seen in movies and I am a person who has had weapons training.
Ask a Native American, “ If the government says you don’t need a gun, YOU NEED A GUN!”
I'm also Native American I'm Chickasaw and this is the TRUTH
Famous quote:turn in your weapons,the government will take care of you.
@@shauntharp3983 They sure will in a way that you don't want.
What does the nationality have to do with it? The truth is the truth!!
@@dvig3261
Historical referencing dimwit.
Once someone says “I wanna buy a shotgun because I don’t want to aim” their opinion is completely irrelevant lmao.
I agree but your name and picture are funny lol
The spread of any shotgun at home defense distances might be 4 inches at the extreme. Most will be around 1 inch spread.
I gave you a thumb up for the name and picture. Oh yeah I also agree.
TBH I can't hit the broadside of a barn with a shotgun. I'll stick to my pistols and rifles which I carry and shoot regularly. BTW - I'm a democrat.
lte alone a fucking pistol shotgun which this guy referenced. "i saw it in a movie burhur"
"The halls of Congess are littered with hypocrites."
Took the words straight from my mouth
Should be a shirt
The first firearm safety rule: Don’t let the government take away your guns.
Nj resident here: Everything he said about NJ’s state government is spot on.
It’s sad here.
We all collectively hate living here
Her family should have sued the State Government for negligence. Especially if she had a restraining order. They failed to protect her and infringed upon her right to protect herself.
Wildwood is beautiful but I will never patronage NJ again due to their asinine gun hating laws
@@Cayenne420 Supreme Court has ruled the Police have no duty to protect citizens in other cases. They would just cite those decision and be done with it unless you were able to get it appealed and heard by the Supreme Court. A long expensive prospect with no guarantee.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bare arms, shall not be infringed."
If you want to ban specific types of rifles, you are anti-2A, because banning specific rifles is infringement.
The guy is a jackass to heck with that demo rat. Please keep American tactical.
Any weapon of offense or armor of defense
@@mikwhsjs7972
Demonic-rat?
The Godless Left... sits at "the left hand of GOD?
Marx was a Satanist. Alinsky, who wrote their bible "Rules for Radicals" credits Satan for the inspiration of his book, right in the forward.
Coincidence?
That's right.
Any law is an infringement
“Why do people think democrats are anti-gun???”
Me a Virginian: 🧐🧐🧐 Hmm I wonder?
God Bless Ya'll!
Hope and pray things turn around quickly for ya'll!
Keep voting hopefully can get him out once enough people wake up
Protest in Fairfax county tomorrow. Spread the word.
Fi Duong really? Im local so hell yeah
The level of ignorance with the people making the laws is insane. Terrifying...
...........most of it is generated out of a combination of ignorance and arrogance. They're basically stupid .....and they're proud of it.
The fact that people believe they are ignorant of what they are doing is terrifying. Their goal is to intentionally disarm the citizens. World history will tell you what comes next
That's why the gun crowd should be writing reasonable legislation instead of opposing everything.
Center Extremist I would argue we already have reasonable legislation. I think there is actually a lot of unreasonable legislation that needs to be repealed
@@andrewhill1251 .......any legislation is rendered irrelevant by the 2nd Amendment, ...nothing can supersede the 2nd Amendment. The US Constitution is supreme. The 2nd can only be modified by a Constitutional Convention, ...and chances of that are slim and none. Many of the gun laws already on the book are technically unconstitutional. The Court doesn't see safety issues or laws to prevent convicted felons from gun ownership as an infringement, but those laws are already on the books.
"We don't wanna take away your rights! We just don't want you to have guns or say things we disagree with. No big deal!"
"C'mon man! Get with the program! Why are you so racist?"
Colion really needs his own tv station. He’s spitting facts and well educated. Not yt censor shyt
While I agree, the government is probably going to censor the show because, well its the government.
I hope to see him on the Warrior Poet Society Network. He and John already have a video together, it’s the logical next step.
They should put him and Joe Rogan together moderating a Trump and Biden debate
You have no idea how much the media is controlled or works along side the DNC. I can go back decades with movies and media making out right lies about guns. They would literally try to attack his family. Like they did to Tucker Carlson.
Wow, thanks for the likes. ❤️
"The halls of Congress are littered with hypocrites." Yep.
There is no lie I hate more than listening to a Democrat use “the framers” argument. The Framers would already have revolted from this tyranny.
It is tyranny at this point. The problem is we have a whole party dedicated to lying to the American people about why we need the 2nd amendment, and why we need guns to protect ourselves. It's the wolves telling the sheep they don't need sheepdogs anymore, and the sheep are falling for it.
We're such pussies today. It's just because America is so big I think.
Amen
@Camulos of Ultor that's absolutely right, bread and circuses...the old Roman emperor's strategy. Keep us entertained and keep us fed...like animals
@Camulos of Ultor Fair point sir. I concur with your statement.
The breakfast club will literally dumb you down if you listen closely enough.
I felt my intellect being drained like the oil from an English car...
@@dvig3261
Or like a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. Lol
I'm pro 2A, not because I "love guns."
I'm pro 2A because I'm a Constitutionalist.
me too, but I also love guns.
.......well said, ....in for a penny, in for a pound. It's all about the US Constitution, ....if they disagree with it, ...I'm sure there is some Socialist/Communist/Marxist nation who would be glad to have them as subjects. I hear Ghana will take anyone seeking to relocate, I wouldn't be against using US resources to help them move.
But loving guns doesn’t hurt my constitutionalist stance.
Well the thing is, actual constitutional scholars have been fumbling over the wording and legal implications of the second amendment for years.
@@matthewarnold4557 well the thing actually is, unconstitutional revisionist "scholars" started trying to destroy the Constitution a little over century ago. The Framers made it clear and the Federalist papers confirm it. We the people have the right to bare arms and form militias.
New Jersey Governor said "a safety society from my taste has fewer guns, not more guns", meanwhile he is always surrounded by armed guards.
Here's the video: ruclips.net/video/vlPtCCrp9EY/видео.html
Thanks to NJ2AS i got my permit within 55 days, i know people waiting over 4 months! NJ sucks!
Bloomberg is the same, he doesn't want us peasants to have weapons but he has 24/7 armed guards.
@Nicholas Walter Good point.
Lets vote Phil Murphy out 2021 😡😡😡
En1gma 2u same here i been waiting since July 12 in NJ. Just a couple months ago i got 3 handgun permits. It came through 2 months later. I had one more I purchased so I needed a permit and did it July 12. Still waiting, u can contact the detective handling the paperwork to give you an estimate and as of a few weeks ago he told me 1 to 2 more months wait. They are processing new fid applicants faster though. Returning applicants are screwed.
Biden: you dont need a 30 round magazine
Me: you dont need 47 years of political power
But here we are 🤷♂️
Someone needs to say this to him, on live television. This would be solid gold.
Anyone know who supports term limits for the whole government?
and he definitely doesn't need 4 more
This comment is pure glory. 😂
@@t0p618 He won't get four more no matter what happens.
CN, I’m glad you do what you do. Keep up the good work!
The Founding Fathers were some of the most intelligent people who ever lived.
Yes absolutely, there intelligent wisdom was I believe given by almighty GOD, that understood what it would take to keep a Nation together until the second coming of our savior .
.
Brings a tear to my eye everytime I think of them.
They were alot of things and not all of em good.
@@Knight_Jon_Artorias those are kool aid tears bro.
Todd Maek-I never said they were perfect.
Whatever the government is willing to use against it’s citizens, the same citizens should be able to own without question. PERIOD.
So does this means all military equipment, vehicles, aircrafts and vessels are belong to the people because it was bought with their money?
Joshua N. Ajang
They used tanks, automatic weapons, and chemical gas in Waco.
So when do i get my predator done? I can put down 10% and pay it off over the next 6 generations.
@@nickmurph1313 that excludes fuel and maintenance right?
Nick Murph
If the US government is using drones to attack America citizens, I want one as well. 🤷♂️
The hunting topic should not even be in the conversation when we talk about the 2nd ammendment, at all. No where in the 2nd amendment says anything about hunting. It was not written for hunting. It was written to protect our freedoms from politicians and government/state/city tyranny. It was also written for self preservation.
Yep.
Well said my friend!
A voice of reason in the rest of this idiocy!
Please consider reading my message here I just posted. I have valid visual proofs and printed proofs of everything within the content of that message. This cabal behind this revolt are the free Masonic Scottish rights sect who follow the teachings of Albert Pike.
Just goes to show their blindness. when I am out hunting for my dinner and I miss 3 times and I go hungry because you think I shouldn't be allowed to have 100 attempts.
This isn't a sporting event this is life or death and these people sitting up in their palaces who have others go out hunting for them, don't need to concern themselves with what the peasants need to do.
Awesome! and Eloquent! As usual!👍👍
“A desert eagle? A 40 caliber?” “It shoots a fOrTY fIvE buLLeTt and a 4-O-1 shotgun shell”... woof.
My head hurts...
Ouch... Wonder if it was the governor or the judge. Oh well Colion just said judge. The only ones I'd consider are the ones that can shoot 454 casull as well as 45 colt/410
Friggin IDIOT. This MAROON wants to take AWAY my rights when he DOESNT understand what rights ARE...
I thought he'd said 4 1 0 shotgun.
@@chrissewell1608 no sir he said 401... he talkin sheeeeeit
Buy a shotgun, says the man surrounded/protected by P90s every day of his life.
If Biden wins then it would only be fair to only allow one double-barreled shotgun to be used for Biden’s protection by the secret service member of his choice. When those shells are spent, fired into the air as warning shots of course, then that agent can then tell Biden that he should have voted for a different candidate for president.
@@itsjustme8135 that politicians believe their lives are more valuable then someone just working their butts off every day of the week is sickening. Leaders of countries that claim freedom have forgotten who their boss is. We are not supposed to serve them, they are supposed to serve us
Well, there are some nice shotguns out there and they will certainly get the home defense job done in 99% of situations. I’m all for owning whatever you want but a good shotgun isnt anything to be scoffed at. A 500 grain slug going at 1600 fps will kill most anything on earth within a certain range.
@@donaldmack2307 Love shotguns, have a ton. I just hate the hypocrisy of someone that is surrounded by full auto PDWs telling me that’s all I can have to defend myself. The same chud that whines incessantly about climate change but gets on a private plane to got to a rally with 6 people. I’m over it.
@@donaldmack2307 Its not that a shottie wouldn't be good, its that he has no right to tell me what I NEED.
I know what I NEED to defend MYSELF, not Dementia Joe who can't even remember what office he's running for at any given moment.
Also the fact that its the Bill of RIGHTS, not the Bill of Needs
Democrats be like “you don’t need guns just call the police” also Democrats “disband and defund the police”
Not 'disband', they say, "defund".
Big difference.
@@griffdocta Defund would essentially render police useless, so disband isn't that far off. Also, they said disband and defund, and people have called for the entire removal of police, so nothing they said was wrong.
@@griffdocta Considering the New York Times published a multi-page article detailing how "yes, Defund the Police means to completely disband the police", I'd say it's pretty clear what they mean.
@@kelaarin No.
Defund, meaning to keep the police doing what they do BUT to redirect some of the funds they recieve and use those funds to hire other ancillary staff that can help deal with people with mental illness. We ask our police to do so much and often, they're put in unfortunate situations. Police are trained to uphold the law, and most do a reasonable job. It might benefit society if we also had people trained to deal with mental health issues accompany the officers on calls where mental illness may be the source for the call. This won't solve all the problems surrounding police but it could be a constructive step on the right direction.
So, defund in that sense....NOT DISBAND.....we need the police and what they do for our society.
@@griffdocta Sorry, but "Defund the Police" means disband them - that is literally what the NYT article said. You have been deceived.
Democratic are the posters children for “rules for thee not for me”.
As an independent, I'd rather vote for a used condom than a democrat ever again. They were so set in getting rid of Trump, no matter the cost, that they have actually just turned a lot of people away from their party. Plainly and simply put. But when you steal elections, wtf do you need votes for, right?
@@cipher88101 Your not an independent. You’re like a Tim Pool “Liberal”. Enlightened centrist ass. “I rise above both parties” kinda guy
@@natoist4889 I'm a Libertarian who always votes for freedom, so I've never once ever voted Democrat which means I have always had to vote Republican just to protect our freedoms even if I disagree with their other platforms.
COVID highlighting that, as one Democrat ignored their own travel bans etc. as us peasants sat at home. Sad most are too stupid to see how corrupt they are.
“Shut up Envy..” lmao stole the words outta my mouth 🤣🤣🤣 Love 4 you and Envy from Cali!! ✊🏽
“ We aren’t anti 2a guys I like guns” 14 seconds later: “weapons are mass destruction you don’t need an ar15”
They aren't anti-gun for THEMSELVES. They are anti-gun for everyone else.
@@armadillotoe THAT is a very important distinction.
"you don't need an AR-15 to take down a deer unless you plan on using 6.5 Grendel... in which case you'll likely need an AR-15 as no other rifle is chambered in 6.5 Grendel"
Ar14...
@@campsitez2355 you don't need a rifle at all to take down a deer. You could chase it off a cliff like the natives did..but a gun helps.
"Benny Thompson is the best shooter in Congress."
Dan Crenshaw- "Hold my beer..."
........love it
The comment I came here looking for!
Crenshaw is a rino. He may shoot well, but he’s not on our side. TAPS, Redflag. And this is coming from a Purple Heart Infantryman. Most of us vets can’t stand that dude.
@@850spirates3
Gotta admit...I was a huge fan until he started getting soft on shit...and not just Red Flag.
Phattygoodness totally agree, I thought cool we have a good one on our side, then it just felt like a stab in the back
Why do people think Dems are anti gun? How many anti gun laws are introduced by Dems as opposed to Repubs?
Biggest problem is he's a black man supporting 2A. This is the democrats biggest fear. Trump support increased in 2022 election amongst especially black men and Hispanics at an alarming rate. They will downplay and say it wasn't that much but don't let them fool you. The Hispanic vote is freaking them out & they feel they're losing their 70+ year stranglehold on black Americans.
When I was growing up there was only thomas Sowell and a couple more black men that spoke like this and were on the right. There were more but no way in hell would they speak out but now I'm seeing black men and woman everywhere in #s I never thought possible.
Kanye west crazy but even he spoke out & mentioned Thomas Sowells name. That's crazy and it would take a wild man to say this in public.
. Jim Brown stuck w him knowing there could be consequences & I barely heard anyone calling him the typical racist slurs usually used in these cases.
You have a real problem when a black man that has this much respect in black community from the civil rights mvt and actually helping inner cities stands by Trump.
Mike Tyson. Dennis Rodman, Floyd Mayweather & a whole lot more when Trump first announced until they basically destroyed anyone or tried to destroy any of them that didn't get in line.
Notice how the ones that stuck by him are the realest and baddest no fear type black dudes around. A lot more feel the same but don't have courage to say it, yet.
This is what's behind the insane move left by democrats with literally everything is racist,, Reparations, equity and every other scheme they're trying to buy off the black community with.
They are evil but dsmn good at what they do. Manipulate and destroy.
It's pathetic and will only make it much worse for 90+% of black Americans. Murder in these communities are already dramatically rising off idiotic policies the democrats have been pushing for last few years. 3500 more black men murdered than at this point last year. Was June when I read this stat.
@@kevinodom2918 Damn, that was quite a read... But I agree with everything you mentioned. It's unfortunate (and pathetic) that race still plays such a major a part in politics. Colion articulates my concerns better than I do. I just wish his common sense perspectives were made known to people who are not just anti-2a, but anti-AR-15 (specifically). Legislators seem COMPLETELY ignorant about guns, yet they make laws we must follow.
"It shoots a 401 shotgun shell" 😂😂😂
Truly an expert 🙄
I herd that to. He the kind of person u don't want going hunting with.
Lol that shit was funny 😆
Politicians make me cringe so bad 😖
Scary people want weapons that they don’t know any thing about.
When they wrote the constitution there were civilians that had the most advanced weapons of war sitting in their front yard. The common man was just as heavily armed as the military. The second amendment is not about hunting.
Back in the days of private cannon ownership, and when repeating rifles were too expensive for the government to equip the military with so all examples we privately owned, so the best guns were owned by private citizens.
Yep, 2A was about the citizenry being able to resist the government and counter tyranny, and it's a shame that culture has forgotten that.
Nailed it.
It’s funny too that people will point out that nobody can fight the military cause they’re too advanced, but have they forgotten everything going on in the Middle East the past 20 years. I mean those are just a bunch of guys with Toyota Tacoma’s and AK-47s and yet they’re able to put up a fight
If you read the other writings of the time, the Founders were very wary of standing armies. They feared that a standing army could be used to run over the citizens. So their you need to be in the "militia" argument is BS also.
ACTUALLY the common man WAS the military!
Umm, because they say, "Hell yeah we are coming from your guns."
That’s good for STARTERS...!
@@jamesboyd1378 not relative to what we had. Thats always been the primary problem, length of time. it was 7 years at one point, i believe.
They never say that lol
@Wary of Extremes lol that's ar 15, not guns, so again, they never said that, dont make a mountain out of a mole hill
@@NerdCoding An ar 15 is not a gun?Smh. Lemme guess, its about gender being fluid, somehow?
A mole hill? Freedom must be a joke to you. I bet you support Dictator Biden bypassing Congress and the People with Executive Orders.
This is the first time I’ve seen one of your videos. I don’t know about the rest of them but the power of your logic and your presentation on this topic is amazing.
You talk about taking away my guns or the right to have and bare arms then we have nothing more to say... You aren't the candidate for me. 2A Matters!
Once the 2nd Amendment is gone, the rest will follow shortly.
@@INoIFearIGaming not shortly after but rather immediately. They're already working on it. People don't realize that socialism does not come with rights included
Colion....well, I can't say it any better than you did. You have a true gift being able to dissect their point of view and counter with common sense. Please, never give up on this. We need you!
Any gun restriction is a "infringement" when will BLM see the democrats want to take their guns.
Because most of them that carry dont carry legally. So they don't care?
Democrats will let BLM keep their guns and provide them with more. It's Everybody else they don't want having firearms. Where do you think all the ammo is going ? Soros, Bloomberg and all their Marxist/communist groups are buying it all up to keep it out of our hands.
Them: "Why do Americans know Democrats are Anti-2A?"
Me: When was the last time a Democrat stood up for the second and cite your source.
"There was no such thing as an ar 15 back in the day"
Uhhhh ya but cannons? Private ships with 40 of them? Ever heard of privateers? Wow these people are insufferable.
You’re forgetting about the pepper hangin that shot multiple shots with one trigger fire. If the NFA existed back in those times that gun would’ve been under the NFA and liberals will be calling it an assault weapon
@SESolutionsEngineering I appreciate people who take their time to teach others. Thank you!👍
Yeah that's why it doesn't say muzkeloader rifles and handguns, it's meant to be timeless and took up with what's current.at the time.
If anything we should be able to buy a stinger shoulder fired middle, and according to the Constitution we can.
I don't know what's so hard to understand about shall not be infringed. ARMS means any weapon, without exception, it's pretty clear.
If someone wanted a fighter jet,.they should be able to buy that too.
@Booge Nautilus I doubt it, why use an inferior weapon? It's a 22 with a little more powder, that is it.
I don't see that being mounted in numbers, no they would use something more like 4 M60 machine guns I'll wager.
@SESolutionsEngineering I get what you are saying, however keep.on mind even an M60 machine gun is crew served weapon and takes at least 2 people to field more when you count ammo and not just the tripod and extra barrel. Also, I would like to point out that a war ship or submarine isn't an individual weapon either, and so is a tank not, but we can own battle tanks right now. ARMS does in fact cover everything as per definition at the time it was written.
“I’m not racist, I have black friends”
Democrats: that’s racist!
Also democrats: “I’m not against 2a, I have a gun!”
🤣
This is the best comment🤣🤣😂😂
"I'm not racist! I have black and white friends!" ($*÷
ive yet to meet a Dem in NJ that was against anything 2a, infact prob 40% of the members at my range are Dems. but i guess its just easier to use blanket statements on millions of people lol. even though if you combine dems and independents they make up more than 50% of actual gun ownership lol.
Saying Dems are anti gun is like saying Catholics are pedos. JK one of those is actually true and its not the first statement.
hahahahaha, good one
We WILL NOT relinquish our second amendment rights.
Started following your channel a few months ago and totally support your cause. As an AF Veteran I'm in full support of the 2A and supporting your cause.
Colion knows these people are so ignorant , and I love that he's calling them all out
Senators response: “republicans only think we are anti 2a because we want to infringe on the right to bear arms, they trippin” 🤣
This guy was projecting so hard when he said republicans repeat that the dems are anti-2A so much that people believe it. That's their favorite tactic. Nevermind the fact that there is an abundance of evidence in the form of laws that prove how anti-2A the dems as a whole are.
Just your local Democrat here:
I think we have a different definition of what Anti-2A means. We don't consider certain gun laws to be anti-2a anymore than you'd consider deformation suits or restrictions on religious practices (like laws that say no human sacrifices) anti-1a.
I think theres a very big disconnect in our definitions which doesn't seem entirely solvable without sitting down and talking stuff out. I'm not sure if anyone else saw it but Obama did answer a 2a question back in 2014(?) where he basically conveyed this idea. He said, paraphrasing, "I don't want to take the guns of any responsible gun owners, like you, but when I have my defense advisors meet with me and point out that we've put several more people on no-fly lists because they are active ISIL sympathizers, it makes us mad. These people are legitimate threats but we can't stop them from getting guns because the NRA and other organizations won't even let the CDC do studies on the effects of guns and gun violence".
There are many Democrats who are anti-2A, I'll give you that, but I know more Democrats who aren't and just want meaningful solutions to gun violence. Not just talking about fixing gun violence and mass shootings but follow through on the solutions. Nothing erked me more than when Republicans started calling mass shooters "a mental health problem not a gun problem" not because I didn't agree, in fact I do agree, but because I knew most Republicans were just deflecting. Most don't actually believe in funding mental health facilities or programs, they just want the discussion to end. They're like All Lives Matter, they made the statement but there's no following up.
Hell yes we're going to take your AR15's!
@@DrArthurCGarp I believe all lives matter.
Because I've never killed anyone. Never got a woman pregnant that wasn't my wife and made her get an abortion.
Never had more than a speeding ticket.
Is that following through enough for you?
Reoublicans aren't the most Pro 2A either
I love how people say the founding fathers never intended for military grade weapons when they literally had privateers. In case you dont know what a privateer is they are a civilian who owned a modern day battleship of the era. So these people thought it was okay to own a modern war ship but not a rifle that shoot more than 5 bullets. These things had 20lb cannons that could shoot holes through an 8 foot fortified fort wall. I think they could care less about a rifle that can shoot 30 bullets.
Bet you money if we gave them a AR15 they would've been so happy
Our government is scared, over the thought privateers could roll up on washington with Abraham tanks if they ever got out of control.
Yeah some also had submarines early in this country, including the civil war. The south invented.the submarine and was the first to use it in naval combat against a war ship.
I wish I could give Colion all the likes for this.
"When you say things enough people believe it" like "Donald Trump's a racist"? Which was never heard of before 2015? 🤷🏻♂️
YUP' He received accolades from black Americans prior and still does.
Yup.
Yeah, they did and yeah, he was.
Umm he actually has multiple documented racist occurrences in his history. It is public knowledge . Strewn throughout most of his professional business dealings, he practiced discrimination more times than one can count actually. I'd say google that but you wont and then you will call it fake news hahahahh Drink the Kool Aid !
@@christianprogrammer9131 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
In the Navy, we often use “should”, “shall”, and “may/will be” to essentially distinguish the differences between a suggestion, a strong recommendation, and a downright requirement. “Shall” is a requirement. And therefore shall not means shall not.
Same with aviation. Same with common law.
The word "shall" is an imperative, by legal definition. Noah Webster was one of the founders, precisely because he'd just published the dictionary of American English language, and his dictionary was an official statement of legal language that continues in use today. I served two decades as a Marine, we used "legal language" to encode everything that was formal, required, and carefully used other language for "can, may, choose", things that are optional. Going into a court martial on an issue that is not laid out in formal law language, can't be prosecuted.
@@johnmcclain3887 Even in law school it is taught and even in government regulated bodies of other professions like accountancy have documents that use "shall" and define it as an imperative command, mandatory, non negotiable, and not permissive.
Democrats: Hell Yes, we are gonna take your guns
Citizens: The dems want to take our GUNS!!
Democrats: *Confused Pikachu face*
Democrat leadership: hell yes, we are gonna take your guns
Non Democrats: they want to take our gun!!!!!!
People vote democrat: I stand for the 2a and a lot of Democrats do.
All the people with more then half a brain: then way the hell do you keep voting Democrat when your leadership don't think you should have guns.
Leads me to think a lot of People in the democrat party don't even know what and who they are voting for they just vote because they where told that the democratic party has there best interests in mind.
Explain to me why a convicted felon can't buy a gun
@@robinmarks1710 Because they've proven to society that they can't be trusted with other peoples' safety.
Robin Marks same reason thieves and killers get locked up. Quit spamming everyone.
Robin Marks why doesn’t that question answer itself?
i am so glad youtube recommended you. subscribed
“Why do people think democrats are anti-2A?”
They told me that they are themselves lol
No kidding man, these people are delusional.
You do know the current administration actually banned something through executive order. Also Ronald Reagan is the reason you can’t just go purchase Assault Rifles. He also implemented 2A restrictions as California governor. So stop with the BS republicans done more damage to my rights than anyone
Proud Englewood what did they ban through executive order? Also the democrats have openly talked about taking them away. Not sure where you hear your news, but no republican talks about taking away gun rights
Proud Englewood - Man - I didn’t realize Reagan was that powerful back in 1934. The NFA is why you cannot just “go out and buy an assault rifle”. More recently the pandemic and Biden have conspired to make it difficult to purchase any guns or ammo for those firearms.
FinnGames Knudson you obviously don’t know your history. The NFA didn’t ban the purchase of assault rifles or fully automatic weaponry. The NGA just made it where you had to pay a tax. In 1986 Reagan made it illegal for you to be able to buy them through gun dealers, distributors or the company itself and for new ones to be made for civilians. Go read up on it before blindly blaming a political side for 2A restrictions. Republicans are just as horrible. They had a majority and we got nothing
I hate people who talk about the framers of our country like they had any interest in hunters when they wrote the 2nd amendment. In that time hunting was a given! The purpose of the 2A is to stop people just like these people
And you were expected to own a cannon in case you were called to war
@@warpedone3711 cannon? How about a friggin war ship.
@@kek397 If you could afford it.
The framers did not want us to have a standing army. Able-bodied men from the age 17 is 76 was considered the militia. In most states you are still considered the militia under states constitutions.
@@warpedone3711 my point was that people think 2a is only for muskets, in reality it even allows you to own frigates ( the battleships of the time) for self defense, heck you can even acquire an entire navy if you can afford it.
(Edit) Self defense includes against a tyrannical government.
@@kek397 The sad part about it they don't even teach the kids in school that is what the second amendment was about. They think it is something to do with hunting.
"We are not going to take your guns"."hell yes we are going to take your guns".
Bump Stock Ban- Donald Trump
Full Auto Weapons ban- Ronald Regan
California Concealed Carry crackdown- Governor Ronald Reagan in 1969 in response to armed protests by Black Panthers, NRA also supported it
Assault Weapons ban- pushed by Bill Clinton SUPPORTED by Reagan
Stop this nonsense. Republicans have passed more anti gun legislation in the past 50 years than any Democrat
@@IWearShaqs party is irrelevant. There should be less restrictions on firearms
@@IWearShaqs and the atf should not be allowed to unilaterally change firearm definitions that have been in place for decades.
@@IWearShaqs a bump stock isn't a firearm,though,LOL besides you can bump fire with your finger.
Damn boating accident
Thank you for being our voice in the 2A community! I ordered my "I Am the Malitia" tee yesterday!
"why do people think we are anti-2A?" *Spends over 8 years telling us how they'll force themselves into our homes and take our guns*
Yes they literally have been saying they will force the police to raid your homes and take your guns
@Hipster Jihadist he only says AR-15. But that's where it starts. ruclips.net/video/QR4mNrW0AlE/видео.html
I was talking bout that today 2 Democrats walked away. They didnt want to believe Obama used national guard on protesters, & Biden wants your guns.... I yelled, coming to a hood near you!!!
7:30. I aGree Government incompetence is systematic.
I was going to sell my guns in the buyback program, but they failed the background checks.
His complete lack of knowledge about gun safety/functionality and gun regulations is horrifying.
He is buying firearms. That means the gateway to knowledge is being opened. He will learn if he continues down this path. We should be seeking these people out and helping them learn. Especially when his mind is open.
I think my farts qualify more as Weapons of Mass Destruction than my AR.
"A weapon that contains a biological agent or toxin; or", unless you shoot lead-free, he's technically correct depending on the situation. "Lead is a highly toxic metal and a very strong poison."
Well i know for sure I can use either to clear a room
Chemical, biological AND radiological, huh?
Lol
4:38 what are you, some kind of lawyer or something?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why people are democrats is even more puzzling question.
If they win office for the next 4 years, how do you think gun laws will be affected?
@@BennyJackson101 I can't tell you how ALL gun laws will be affected, but I can you about a law that would affect guns and gun owners. Under this new bill, most will be banned. Biden said it will be one of his first motions as president to pass an "assault weapon" ban bill, which is already writtem, and is HIGHLY vague, basically covering everything that isn't a revolver, 10 round handgun, 4 round pump or break action shotgun, a bolt action, or mag fed .22's (not .223).
Especially black people! They are supporting a party that fought a war to keep them as slaves. Smfh
Same here! The Democratic party is anti-American. And the fact people that people who aren't far left socialists still vote for them blows my mind.
Just today I saw a huge Biden sign in a front yard. Surrounding that sign were 3 blue lives matter signs and a thin blue line flag. And on the other side of the Biden sign, a gadsen flag with "dont tread on me" as big as could be. So confusing.
Big ol YEP!!!
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -Benjamin Franklin
The quote is "Any people who would give up a little liberty ,for a little security , Will lose both and deserve neither" Also George Washington - "Fire ,like government is a useful servant , but a terrible master"......
@@markrenzella2825
actually Jacob is right.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Ben Franklin
Washington didn't say this. It was written in a letter in 1755 by Franklin to the Colonial Governor.
We’ve literally let these people acquire too much power...
VOTED IN VOTERS FORGOTTEN
FOR A " POLITICAL AGENDA "
THEIR " OATH OF OFFICE "
TO " SUPPORT AND DEFEND "
OUR " CONSTITUTION "
" DERELICTION OF OFFICE "
FOR SOME OF THEM ???
On point as usual. Good stuff.
Dude: can’t own a bazooka
Colion: you actually can
Me: oh yeah, I like where this is going
Its great for us to talk about these things until a lib watches one of these videos and gets the right publicity
Explain to me why a convicted felon can't buy a gun
Robin Marks because they a felon. Any felonies on your record will prevent you from buying a gun
@@robinmarks1710 Because violent criminals forfeit their rights when they prove they can't function as a member of society.
@@KennedyA53 where exactly is that in the constitution
I’m genuinely concerned that people like him exist.....he literally said if you need a gun immediately oh well you can’t get it because you should’ve known before hand that you need a gun
...AND I bet you will never hear him say, to use your exact words, ...if you need an abortion it is because you should've know before hand that you needed birth control or a condom. lol Therefore he wants to restrict abortion procedures the same way a guns??
Rapists and muggers don't make appointments.
Im in the wild west, stand your ground is a nesessity and the fact that so many states dont respect that is a major issue!
Mary Smith YES, yes they do!
@Mary Smith Exactly. "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results." - Albert Einstein.
"Benny Thompson is the best shooter in congress"
Dan Crenshaw: "Hold my eyepatch"
Should have more likes
Crenshaw is pos rino and will sign on to restrict the 2a
@@gregknutson8524 LOL what exactly is that based on?
@@SirPhilMcCrackinVonBeggington His signing and endorsing red flag and praising rino Cheney, you been asleep?
Ignorance is bliss when you are a democrat.
My brother when they try and take our rights away. You sir are who we need to fight in court for us. I for one will lead the money raising part for you. I'm a 60 year old disabled veteran with my weapons. These weapons are all a lot of us have to defend ourselves. I refuse to give up my weapon. You're an awesome young man keep up the fight sir!!!!
Joe Biden's website tells me all I need to know that's why
“Why do people think Democrats are anti-gun?”
*3 seconds later*
“Nobody needs an M16”
What do you NEED an M16 for? Serious question.
@@finisher3x
Guaranteed you ain't even from America. Have you ever even owned a gun?
finisher3x Not an M16 specifically you dunce. Any carbine will work.
@@z31freakify - You'd lose on both points. Not only do I own a gun, I have my permit AND I live in the South. So once again, why does anybody NEED an M-16?
@@finisher3x why would you need a gun then? A gun is a tool for protection doesn't matter the size.
"The founders never envisioned these types of devastating modern weapons..."
Ummm, ever seen what small cannon loaded with grapeshot does to a group of people?
Or the multi shot flintlock rifles.
@SESolutionsEngineering From what I've read, the Puckle Gun was never used in anything more than a "testing" or "experimental" manner. It was never used in any great numbers. Same goes for the Girandoni and the Nock Volley Gun. I may be mistaken, but that's what I have read. AFAIK, the Belton flintlock WAS a one off, but again, I may be mistaken. Even today, we have rifles and other weapons that are "futuristic", advanced, but evolutionary "dead ends", like the H&K caseless cartridge rifle, various other caseless cartridge firearms. Awesome idea, but a dead end at this time. Someday, they might get dusted off and inspire someone to create the next generation of firearms, but right now, there's just no market or interest for them.
The framers literally worked with guys like benjamin franklin; an inventor and one of the most important minds of all time
Its insane that politicians act like men like him couldnt foresee what would come
Hell, A Kentucky flintlock of the day has more stopping power then most over the counter home defense weapons. Just loading is a pain.
@@TOAOM123 What is also mind boggling to me is they used the term ARMS, not muskets, not rifles, not pistols, but ARMS!! If I tell you to go to an ARMS dealer, what weapons are you thinking to see there????
Now as to the limit on 2A being like limits of free speech and you can't yell fire in a crowded movie theater....well, you can yell fire in a crowded movie theater and be called a hero if the movie theater is on fire, it is only when you fraudulently and maliciously with intent to cause harm and mayhem is it prevented. Much as it is ILLEGAL to wave guns around to cause fear and panic.....but you can still talk in a movie theater and you SHOULD be able to KEEP and BEAR ARMS....to own and carry weapons.
“They” will be coming for this channel soon. Just saying.
You do too good a job explaining your positions.
Oh no not... “THEY”.
OUR position
“Well, you shouldn’t have it because nobody NEEDS one of those!”
- People have a lot of things they don’t NEED. We have a Bill Of RIGHTS in this country..... not a Bill Of NEEDS.
Agreed. 99.999 % of gun owners just own them for fun....I do
We need guns in order to keep our elected officials in check and remind them that they serve at our will .
I have about 20 guns I don't need! Damn I just bought a 300 blk and don't need it. I wanted it and I'm a f$&king American that hasn't been arrested & blessed to have the right. I've served my country, I know what a gun can do to someone. I live with what I've seen and done. I'm not going to another country to fight for my country, only to come home where my family has to fear their own. I may sound like an ass, yet don't care. We all have that right. You carry your shotgun, he can feel bad b/c a bad guy carried a gun in a movie? Pussy! He can vote with my life and then vote to have my guns taken.
@@ghop5846 what 300 blk you pick up?
"No one needs a gun." No one NEEDS an iphone, everyone needs the ability to defend their life and livelihood.
"I dont know why they think we are anti 2A"
Goes on to literally explain how we know they hate the second amendment.
Hey colion, thank you for the knowledge you put out there. People need to know these things.
Nice to finally hear someone who knows why we have our rights!.. he sounds more educated than the politicians defending gun rights!
Yeah, they should try defending a home invasion with a flintlock.
Shoot the first one then beat hell out of the others with the steel and wood club you are now holding.
Or a Judge lol
A Blunderbuss and a brace of pistols loaded with buck and ball can be quite an effective defence. LOL
lol.
Canister shot
"The BEAUTY of the 2ND AMENDMENT Is that it will not be needed until THEY Try to take it." -Thomas Jefferson ✊😎🇺🇸
Fake quote
"Corn pop was a bad dude"
-Joe Biden
Corey The Kid Maze making quotes up.
Here’s the actual quote “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."- Thomas Jefferson
Why Carry a Gun? -- A History Lesson!
My old Granddad said to me, "Son, there comes a time in every man's
life when he stops bustin' knuckles and starts bustin' caps and
usually, it's when he becomes too old to take a whipping.
I don't carry a gun to kill people; I carry a gun to keep from being killed.
I don't carry a gun because I'm evil; I carry a gun because I have
lived long enough to see the evil in the World.
I don't carry a gun because I hate the government; I carry a gun
because I understand the limitations of government.
I don't carry a gun because I'm angry; I carry a gun so that I don't
have to spend the rest of my life hating myself for failing to be
prepared.
I don't carry a gun because I want to shoot someone; I carry a gun
because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed and not on a
sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.
I don't carry a gun to make me feel like a man; I carry a gun because
men know how to take care of themselves and the ones they love.
I don't carry a gun because I feel inadequate; I carry a gun because
unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate.
I don't carry a gun because I love it; I carry a gun because I love
life and the people who make it meaningful to me.
Police protection is an oxymoron: Free citizens must protect
themselves because police do not protect you from crime; they just
come after something has happened, investigate the crime to see what
happened, and then call someone in to clean up the mess.
Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to
take a whoopin'!
A LITTLE GUN HISTORY...
BE SURE TO READ THIS...
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control: From 1929 to 1953,
about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control: From 1915 to 1917, 1.5
million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated
-----------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938: From 1939 to 1945, a total
of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves
were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------
China established gun control in 1935: From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964: From 1964 to 1981, 100,000
Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970: From 1971 to 1979, 300,000
Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956: From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------
56 million defenseless people were rounded up and exterminated in the
20th Century because of gun control.
-----------------------
You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians
disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes,
gun control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
With guns, we are 'citizens'; without them, we are 'subjects'.
During WW II, the Japanese decided not to invade America because they
knew most Americans were ARMED!
Gun owners in the USA are the largest armed forces in the World!
If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message
to all of your friends.
The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is
more important than either.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES A GUN TO EVERY HOUSEHOLD. SWITZERLAND’S GOVERNMENT
ISSUES AND TRAINS EVERY ADULT IN THE USE OF A RIFLE.
SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY
CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER! DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX
DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL law-abiding CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.
I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment!
If you are too, please forward this. If you're not a believer, please
reconsider based on these true facts.
This is history; not what's being shown on TV, sanctioned by our
illustrious delusional leaders in Washington.
I would forward this but there is no share link. I will save and copy later. Thank you for this.
Amen
@@paulnickason4793 I wish there was that option on a cell phone.
Lots of history there. Let's not repeat it here. Protect our rights. Yes to the second amendment.
Nah fr , amen
Almost a full year here in NY and still waiting for my pistol license
keep waiting, Freddo's Brodda, Dictato cuomo commands that his bodyguards are the only guns that are necessary
Start a class action lawsuit with other NY'ers for them infringing on your right. This SCOTUS would put them in their place, for sure.
Much as you may now want to hear this, it sounds like it's time to move to another state. Not just for the 2A and Gun Rights reasons either, but for most other reasons too.
Did you ever get it
A 401 shotgun shell🤣
@Kelsey Nilsen crazy bastard! Ar 14 doesn't exist!....you mean the AR 13
I just bought a brand new banana clip and filled it up heat seeking bullets for my romanian machine gun
It can shoot a 45 and a 410 ?? Wow! The judge must be an auto-chambering hand cannon then!
Spike Flea Taurus makes it. It’s the Taurus Judge. It shoots 45 and .410. Now you know a little about it😃
MDallDayPrepper hahahahaha.
This door buster is talking about common sense, yet, with all due respect, like Bloomberg, offer illiterate 2A arguments they should be embarrassed by. Unless they guarantee every legal gun owner the same 24/7 armed escort and bullet proof vehicle they enjoy the protection of, they should mind their own business. And since they wil never consider it, neither should we consider giving our means of self defense away.
I am always so impressed with Colion and his grasp of the facts...
Great vid man!!
Maybe because they say things like "we need to confiscate these weapons and persecute the resistors".
Amen, I agree with every word you say. Side note, damn I wish there was lawyers like you in my state.
They’re not “against guns”, they’re against guns for common citizens.
Disarm their body guards and let's see how their reactions
Explain to me why a convicted felon can't buy a gun
Not just Demokkkrats but elitists as well. Remember how that Man-child "governor" Ted Wheeler had security escort him to the "mostly peaceful" protests? The same guy who bucked having Trump send in the national guard.
Alyssa Milano's husband called 911 fairly recently when they heard gunshots near their property. It turned out to be a neighborhood kid with an airsoft gun.
For thee but not for me!
Robin Marks Because people are willing to abide by unconstitutional laws.
You’re the man! Thanks for being our voice! Stay tactical my friends!
Umm...because it's in their official platform to restrict gun ownership...?
Their silly, transparent attempt at subterfuge by constantly using "common sense" and "reasonable" when trying to push 2A infringements is evidence enough.
When the founders mentioned a militia, they meant every citizen. Every citizen was expected to be armed and stand and fight for the country, themselves and their neighbors.
@Clarence Wilson: According to U.S. Code 10; Section 246, there are two different militias. The Organized Militia, and The Unorganized Militia.
Man thnx again love your vids so true every time 🔥🔥🔥🔥👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻✊🏼✊🏼✊🏼✊🏼✊🏼✊🏼✊🏼✊🏼
Please keep doing what your doing my friend. We more need people like you! Thank you
Gun laws: *exists*
2A: *CONSTITUTIONAL OVERRIDE INITIATED*
If only SCOTUS would do their jobs and strike all that bullshit down.
The real question is when Charlemagne gonna get his "black card" back from Joe Biden....and when he gonna come out the closet.
Keep it up man....Great Vid
This is the best response from Colion !!!!
I’m glad someone mentioned that case regarding the women in NJ who lost her life. She’s not the only one!
He picks his guns based on what he sees in movies 😂
The judge SEEMS cool, and everyone says the ar LOOKS menacing. The glock? Hell, that's not dangerous. That's what the police carry.
@@jnywd8450 the AR-15 does look menacing to some, but remember the same holds true for the Glock. Just because it doesn't look as scary, doesn't mean it's less dangerous. A Glock 17 in the right hands is deadlier than an AR pattern rifle in most situations
@@GeorgeLiquor I know. My edc is a gen1 G21c. That comment was supposed to be the point of view of someone who doesn't know much
Hey, EVERY ONE of us started out doing that. It’s a phase you’ve got to get through.
🤯
Bennie Thompson also chairs the House Homeland Security committee and wants to get rid of ICE, so don't put too much into him owning guns.