The plane that has been grounded has been flying since the 24th again, and is currently in the air when I am writing this comment. Don't pay attention to AI channels like this one who don't bother doing research.
The opposition was capitalising on Airbus' screw-up. Sorry Boeing..... your huge screw up even extended to the space vehicle which needed to be a abandoned by its crew.
"... a major airline has grounded its A330neo fleet ..." Well, this "fleet" consists of exactly ONE aircraft which had just been delivered just some days earlier (what the spoken text then correctly reports). So why then the bombastic exaggeration? In aviation, the term "grounding" usually refers to a mandatory instruction by an aviation authority to immediately suspend the operation of a certain type or series of aircraft. We had the 737 MAX grounded, the "Dreamliner", now the 777X test fleet. The A330neo was not grounded, nowhere in the world, never.
In my mind, the strident tone of the airline's current CEO is reassuring. For too long, the airline's CEOs have been lame ducks; when they deal with western counterparts, they're like shrinking violets. May this current CEO stay firm.
It was "Grounded" for 48 hours, and most of that would be waiting for the spare part to be flown out. It seems Airbus and RR were very attentive. I wonder who made that part...........?
STUPID channel - Stupid and outdated and click bait. After being grounded for a couple of days, Malaysia Airlines has reinstated its new Airbus A330neo for its Kuala Lumpur to Melbourne route. The newly delivered widebody aircraft was grounded temporarily after it faced a series of technical issues after two return flights to Australia.
I don't want to hear about every AIRBUS is in big trouble anymore because, I don't want to make AIRBUS in Indonesia is in big trouble too as my nightmare is almost lesson than before.
The Americans must be loving this. The video is twice as long ss it needs to be, repeating itself... If it's Boeing, I'm not going ..... if it's Airbus ?? I have got to like the 380 .... but 330neo ?? FIX IT !!
@@IzKlse Boeing? If it's Boeing ....I'm not going. I'm not getting on MAS's or Batik's B737 MAX. There's nothing wrong with Airbus. You should know that there were also many defects to deal with when accepting Boeing aircraft in Seattle.
Appreciate the detailed breakdown! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
Malaysia airline "MAS" never recovered from the missing airline in sea and the downing of it's plane over in eastern Ukraine. The constant problems plagued by the poor maintenances and technical failures of planes causing many aborted or grounded flights appearing in social media news. Why is it only the delivery of the Neo airbus happened in our country and not other countries who received the same airbus? Note : There are 145 aircraft in service with 21 operators as of November 2024 (2 years service record). The five largest operators of A330neo are Delta Air Lines (31), TAP Air Portugal (19), Condor (17), ITA Airways (11) and Cebu Pacific (9).
It will be traced back to that faulty part which would have been through Quality Control and certified serviceable to be installed into the engine. No? RR will trace it back to the supplier of that specify part that was faulty. Almost like, failed on fitment, to ground a new aircraft.
Nothing wrong with the plane, it's the personnel issues. Malaysia are famous for spending billions of dollars on infrastructures such as stadiums, roads , rails, planes, submarines, planes and helicopters...but they simply lack the expertise to maintain it. They are a country with first class infrastructures but with 3rd world mentality. It's not a surprise really, as the country has suffered from years of mismanagement, corruption and abuse of power. Only now, with the new PM Anwar in power, there is genuine hope that the country will prosper and establish itself as a new economic power.
C919 could actually be safer given that only old but mature technologies are used. Only that it's not efficient to operate. When it involves new technologies, it would also involve changes to assembly processes and quality checks on the factory floor. Often flaws in such new processes and checks need time to reveal themselves. This MAS case is considered a classic feedback from customers and is not unexpected. I believe they have well established procedures to address such feedbacks to make this plane model all the more safe not just for passengers of MAS but that of other airlines. And this is also a learning opportunity for other manufacturers that are watching. In that sense, a setback can be a blessing in disguise.
Commercial aircraft manufacturers fro China and Russia should come in as to replace this void and not rely on Airbus and Boeing anymore. This is a fact. Period.
You are so ignorant. Russia is the most sanctioned country in the world now. Their currency Rubel is not even trading as it's value is now less than USD 0.01 Russia is going back to times worst than the USSR. They don't have any commercial aircraft that any airline would want to use if they have a choice. Russia doesn't make anything without foreign components and since they're being sanctioned that going to be a very very very long time.
@@a_min60 you don't need to know the name to want to know the truth, it's been 10 years after all. Do you believe the official version? Maybe the rest of the world knows Mas and gov (at that time) are corrupt with how they handled it at that time, that is just follow whatever the West tells them like a good servant, so WEAK! iirc, the pm at that time also was missing for 2-weeks when the tragedy happened, so sus man! And Mas continue buying from airbvs even though in 2020, there was a potential corruption scandal between airbvs and another Msian airliner; firefly, look it up. I wouldn't be surprised if mas execs get kick backs if they choose AB over others, and it's not cheap, it's probably tens of millions that could have been spent on the planes itself to make it safer; such as using better quality components/materials, better QC and safety inspection etc. Sedap je panggil orang lain bodo, entah bila la tu nak cari dan minta maaf? Tulis kat komen belum tentu dia baca, silap-silap dpt dosa kering je.
What a waste of money ... MAS should be looking at CHINESE AIRCRAFT.. The C919 Cheaper to maintain , Cheaper to buy and no need to pay in US dollars but of course MAS has to brush up their service 😂🤣🤩
C919 could actually be safer given that only old but mature technologies are used. Only that it's not efficient to operate. When it involves new technologies, it would also involve changes to assembly processes and quality checks on the factory floor. Often flaws in such new processes and checks need time to reveal themselves. This MAS case is considered a classic feedback from customers and is not unexpected. I believe they have well established procedures to address such feedbacks to make this plane model all the more safe not just for passengers of MAS but that of other airlines. And this is also a learning opportunity for other manufacturers that are watching.
@ Eh Ah Lee ah! What talking you? Look at your name leh, and you talk about racism. Aren’t you on the receiving end of it from the Type-M? Wake up your ideas lah.
@@TheTeaParty320 Wake up to my what now? I have great relationship with my Malay friends and we respect each other. It's true that many politicians are weaponizing race and religion to further their own agenda, but that does not give you the right to be racist. People like you making racist statements will only fuel the fire even more and justifying those politician's actions. You are not helping the issue, you are part of the issue.
The best airline that ever came out of Malaysia is Singapore Airlines - the World’s Best. If you’re flying Malaysian Airlines, ask yourself why. Unless, off course, you might be looking for a sight seeing tour of the Southern Ocean.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
The plane that has been grounded has been flying since the 24th again, and is currently in the air when I am writing this comment. Don't pay attention to AI channels like this one who don't bother doing research.
The opposition was capitalising on Airbus' screw-up. Sorry Boeing..... your huge screw up even extended to the space vehicle which needed to be a abandoned by its crew.
The new look livery is great!
Click bait. Get to the point!
Waist of time.
💯👍 with you.
Waste not waist.😉
… in BIG TROUBLE!? Nae. It’s just one of those many RUclips contents clickbait headlines.
This is NOT BIG TROUBLE at all. It's resolved in a few days. Stop making sensational headlines for views!
"... a major airline has grounded its A330neo fleet ..."
Well, this "fleet" consists of exactly ONE aircraft which had just been delivered just some days earlier (what the spoken text then correctly reports). So why then the bombastic exaggeration?
In aviation, the term "grounding" usually refers to a mandatory instruction by an aviation authority to immediately suspend the operation of a certain type or series of aircraft. We had the 737 MAX grounded, the "Dreamliner", now the 777X test fleet. The A330neo was not grounded, nowhere in the world, never.
In my mind, the strident tone of the airline's current CEO is reassuring.
For too long, the airline's CEOs have been lame ducks; when they deal with western counterparts, they're like shrinking violets.
May this current CEO stay firm.
It was "Grounded" for 48 hours, and most of that would be waiting for the spare part to be flown out. It seems Airbus and RR were very attentive. I wonder who made that part...........?
This sounds like a Boeing troll.
STUPID channel - Stupid and outdated and click bait. After being grounded for a couple of days, Malaysia Airlines has reinstated its new Airbus A330neo for its Kuala Lumpur to Melbourne route. The newly delivered widebody aircraft was grounded temporarily after it faced a series of technical issues after two return flights to Australia.
This is the decline of the duopoly’s commercial aircraft manufacturing prowess.
video is too long, and keep repeating, for this small engine glitch
I don't want to hear about every AIRBUS is in big trouble anymore because, I don't want to make AIRBUS in Indonesia is in big trouble too as my nightmare is almost lesson than before.
The Americans must be loving this. The video is twice as long ss it needs to be, repeating itself... If it's Boeing, I'm not going ..... if it's Airbus ?? I have got to like the 380 .... but 330neo ?? FIX IT !!
A AIRBUS ❤
B. Boeing : second fiddle
It not the aircraft, but due to a component supplied, the OEM engine. Airbus merely installed that component to its aircraft. No?
A for Airbus
B for Boeing
C for Comac
@@JohnEbert-bo1yz
I don't understand why Airbus released this technical problem of new aircraft ? Can we reject this order and change to Boeing.
@@IzKlse Boeing? If it's Boeing ....I'm not going. I'm not getting on MAS's or Batik's B737 MAX. There's nothing wrong with Airbus. You should know that there were also many defects to deal with when accepting Boeing aircraft in Seattle.
Appreciate the detailed breakdown! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
Malaysia airline "MAS" never recovered from the missing airline in sea and the downing of it's plane over in eastern Ukraine. The constant problems plagued by the poor maintenances and technical failures of planes causing many aborted or grounded flights appearing in social media news. Why is it only the delivery of the Neo airbus happened in our country and not other countries who received the same airbus?
Note : There are 145 aircraft in service with 21 operators as of November 2024 (2 years service record). The five largest operators of A330neo are Delta Air Lines (31), TAP Air Portugal (19), Condor (17), ITA Airways (11) and Cebu Pacific (9).
happened at delta,that two tragedy was never the airlines fault
It will be traced back to that faulty part which would have been through Quality Control and certified serviceable to be installed into the engine. No? RR will trace it back to the supplier of that specify part that was faulty. Almost like, failed on fitment, to ground a new aircraft.
COMAC laughing at the corner:
if u boarded their recent flights those first batches are using duct tapes now to seal their windows.
Next time purched them from China 919 , full consumption at half, to see the difference in efficiency!
They could probably buy up old DC-9s much, much, cheaper, because that's the level of technology we're talking about....
Airbus should sell it first to Air France The only problem is when what Air France does best occurs, Airbus reputation is on the line.
Did other Airlines who added this similar configuration face similar consequences or Malaysian Airlinrs was a beleaguered isolated case .
delta also faced some problem with their new a330,smh not as big as this,what a surprise right?
Nothing wrong with the plane, it's the personnel issues.
Malaysia are famous for spending billions of dollars on infrastructures such as stadiums, roads , rails, planes, submarines, planes and helicopters...but they simply lack the expertise to maintain it.
They are a country with first class infrastructures but with 3rd world mentality.
It's not a surprise really, as the country has suffered from years of mismanagement, corruption and abuse of power.
Only now, with the new PM Anwar in power, there is genuine hope that the country will prosper and establish itself as a new economic power.
Worsening with Anwar
WELL SAID.
I really hope the ultra nationalist and muslim extremists coalition PN will never be in power in the future. They're the worst
customer doing QA for Airbus? What a shame.
They are thoroughly tested before delivery & acceptence, maybe minor teething problems for this 1 aircraft out of 140 dlvd
Yes
New aircrafts were like cars first 7 yrs trouble free. Now this does happened any more. Choosen the wrong engine.
"Choosen" 😀. Are you from the outback or somewhere..........?
MAS livery looks great on the A330, its a solid plane. It will be excellent.
Why is Malaysia Airline often is in the news for the wrong reasons. Playing negatively, in customers mind. No?
MAS acc now positve, Petronas stands same height with its peers...
Big story when it's an AIRBUS. If it's the other one, 🤐🤐🤐
C919 could actually be safer given that only old but mature technologies are used. Only that it's not efficient to operate.
When it involves new technologies, it would also involve changes to assembly processes and quality checks on the factory floor. Often flaws in such new processes and checks need time to reveal themselves.
This MAS case is considered a classic feedback from customers and is not unexpected. I believe they have well established procedures to address such feedbacks to make this plane model all the more safe not just for passengers of MAS but that of other airlines. And this is also a learning opportunity for other manufacturers that are watching.
In that sense, a setback can be a blessing in disguise.
In other words the same fit as everyone else
Attempt to save Boeing, making such video isn't the solution.
Try making video of latest Boeing 737 800 crashing in JeJu. Korea.
Bs! Not buying it.
🇲🇾 MAS 👍
US troll 👿
Is Rolls Royce responsible?
Sure
@@FLIGAVIA They will sort it. Probably have done so already.
The problem has been resolved by Airbus and Rolls Royce. They issued a joint statement yesterday.
Rolls Royce now faces integrity and accountability issues.
The RR order book speaks for itself. They're working to capacity right now to fulfill orders........
Ah the lgbt engine from the labour party.
Commercial aircraft manufacturers fro China and Russia should come in as to replace this void and not rely on Airbus and Boeing anymore. This is a fact. Period.
You are so ignorant. Russia is the most sanctioned country in the world now. Their currency Rubel is not even trading as it's value is now less than USD 0.01
Russia is going back to times worst than the USSR. They don't have any commercial aircraft that any airline would want to use if they have a choice. Russia doesn't make anything without foreign components and since they're being sanctioned that going to be a very very very long time.
No thanks, I would not fly on a non-Airbus/Boeing airliner.
Yah you sanctions the good one and accept the low quality one. This must be great.
@@MaverickEchoJuliet A or C , no more B ..
China speaking
The only plane in that fleet and the whole fleet grounded? Lol
Whete is the missing Malaysian Airlines MS337? No update for the truth?
you don't even know the flight name..愚かな日本人
@@a_min60 you don't need to know the name to want to know the truth, it's been 10 years after all. Do you believe the official version?
Maybe the rest of the world knows Mas and gov (at that time) are corrupt with how they handled it at that time, that is just follow whatever the West tells them like a good servant, so WEAK! iirc, the pm at that time also was missing for 2-weeks when the tragedy happened, so sus man!
And Mas continue buying from airbvs even though in 2020, there was a potential corruption scandal between airbvs and another Msian airliner; firefly, look it up. I wouldn't be surprised if mas execs get kick backs if they choose AB over others, and it's not cheap, it's probably tens of millions that could have been spent on the planes itself to make it safer; such as using better quality components/materials, better QC and safety inspection etc.
Sedap je panggil orang lain bodo, entah bila la tu nak cari dan minta maaf? Tulis kat komen belum tentu dia baca, silap-silap dpt dosa kering je.
Very late video 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
🥲btw thanks for your comment
What a waste of money ... MAS should be looking at CHINESE AIRCRAFT.. The C919 Cheaper to maintain , Cheaper to buy and no need to pay in US dollars
but of course MAS has to brush up their service 😂🤣🤩
Not until Chairman Xi uses C919 as his regular travel plane.
@@kclee1 he is rather use C929. Your vision is too narrow.
@@Mk-qc2yt You convince yourself first.
look in long term effects,it's just gonna fall of the sky one day
C919 could actually be safer given that only old but mature technologies are used. Only that it's not efficient to operate.
When it involves new technologies, it would also involve changes to assembly processes and quality checks on the factory floor. Often flaws in such new processes and checks need time to reveal themselves.
This MAS case is considered a classic feedback from customers and is not unexpected. I believe they have well established procedures to address such feedbacks to make this plane model all the more safe not just for passengers of MAS but that of other airlines. And this is also a learning opportunity for other manufacturers that are watching.
Damn Suai!
When Syed Mohtar handle nation local rice-no issue, now local rice dissapear from market by this criminal Tycoon !!!
Malaysia is the only country which operates submarines which cannot sink.
@@TheTeaParty320 tell that the bahlul ketuanan types
Just another stupid moron commenting.
Put a Type-M in charge of an airline, and they’ll sink it.
We got a racist here.
@ Eh Ah Lee ah! What talking you? Look at your name leh, and you talk about racism. Aren’t you on the receiving end of it from the Type-M? Wake up your ideas lah.
@@TheTeaParty320 Wake up to my what now? I have great relationship with my Malay friends and we respect each other.
It's true that many politicians are weaponizing race and religion to further their own agenda, but that does not give you the right to be racist.
People like you making racist statements will only fuel the fire even more and justifying those politician's actions. You are not helping the issue, you are part of the issue.
@@AngelLee162540 these are the kind of people who doesn’t want to see Malaysia as multicultural ethnic living in harmony…
Just another stupid moron commenting.
The best airline that ever came out of Malaysia is Singapore Airlines - the World’s Best. If you’re flying Malaysian Airlines, ask yourself why. Unless, off course, you might be looking for a sight seeing tour of the Southern Ocean.
How did Singapore Airlines come out of Malaysia? Singapore is a different country.
@ Please go and read up about both airlines then come back.
Just another stupid moron commenting.
@@zulkiplihassan9896u know lah…that type of people…that species😅🙆🏻♂️
M@@burunghantu7680 MSA airlines.... Singapore airlines kebaya... former malayan airlines
Neo problem..why still use this..rejected
look like u the one problem here