Amazes me how we're able to create such complex pieces of machinery. Mad really. I struggle to put a shelf up at home and there's guys out there making these things. Crazy.
it's not human, all their tech, ideas and designs come form conjuring, via alters and ceremonial magik..sourcery...starting even before egypt, atlantis...via non-human elemental etheral forces..and with that is at a high cost of human sack-raf-ices.
@@TheUrantia001 i agree with the high cost of human sacrifices. Nearly all technology improvements come with their share of stiffs. The only way you learn is by making mistakes.
I worked on a big project with Rolls-Royce jet engines and the United States government. The project was very high-pressure. Deadlines were incredibly tight making deliveries at 1 to 3 AM in the morning so we can get them in testing when the team showed up, and of course, being aviation everything had to be perfect and extremely well documented. The security surrounding it is definitely next level. It was a great project when I am very proud of, I was given an extremely special gift from the project as a bonus, under the terms and conditions, it would remain in a private public area. It is my number one Pease in my collection of manufactured parts. I worked on in a 38 year career.
unfortunately ITS NOT the companies of the UK who can make our lives safer, ITS ALL DOWN TO THE liebor party, who are continually making the UK as UNSAFE AS THEY CAN, by 'importing' the invasion forces daily.
The biggest issue is that the initial engines are aimed at large wide body powertrain demands. RR needs to offer at least one smaller version fast in order to offer at least one option for narrow body planes to which there are the biggest order backlogs. With so many backlogs, those ordering now can afford to wait and see what RR offers and see if Airbus and Boeing will offer them as options. Plus a new supplier offers to cut some of the scarcity of the engines. Airbus is already cutting its output due mostly to waiting for engines to be on offer. We can see that airlines are willing to use long range narrow body jets on long range routes as customers will suffer this space for ticket prices. RR may also be the first to truly offer a jet engine built to run on SAF. At present engines are being modified to run on SAF. Having an engine built to run easier on SAF means less risk and offers an airline a jet to test this new fuel on. The Biggest drawback is the engine size no matter the performance. There is a limit on jet size and plane logistics that can keep adding a taller engine. RR is also new to commercial geared jet engine unlike the current Pratt and Whitney engine which while it has suffered reliability and design launch issues offers P+W early understanding of these challenges and we all know the gearbox offers a significant advantage against just better blades and internal combustion improvements.
Good comment, RR bailed on participating with P&W on GTF architecture and went their own way after IAE buyout. Focusing only on high thrust applications is a mistake going against GE with their enormous resources and market clout with GE90/GenX. The P&W GTF gearbox was never the issue, it was designing the rest of the engine like a Ferrari when a Honda Accord would have worked just fine.
My number one concern with aero jet engines is , especially large commercial passenger planes is reliability . I don't care how little fuel it consumes , how pretty it looks , how powerful it is . Only how reliable it is and gets me to my destination safely .Also I do not believe that the reduced operating costs of the new engines will be reflected in reduced air fares , why should they ? IT has NOT happened in the past . The only thing that has lowered air ticket prices is volume !
Don’t waste your time watching the entire video everything that could’ve been said about the new engine could have been completed and less than four sentences instead of continually repeating the same mantra over and over again
What is British? It is not a nationality because there is no such country as Britain. Britain is a union of countries, and is the first step towards European Union (another "union", not a country). The European Union was the next step towards global union, or the New World Order. I am English. Best to be either English, Scottish, Irish, or Welsh. We can still get along together! (Apologies for my rant ...)
The American P51 (known as the Mustang when delivered to the UK) was a very average fighter with its Allison engine, especially at height. But when fitted with the Rolls Royce Merlin engine by the British ( as fitted to the Spitfire and other important planes) it was transformed into perhaps the best piston engined fighter plane of the Second World War.
In wartime- time is crucial. Fitting an existing proven engine was an easier decision than hoping US engine makers could deliver the same in such a short window to make a war outcome difference and avoid more US airmen being killed with the existing engine
Let's not forget that the production Mustangs used Merlins made by Packard. Not only that, but a lot of Packard Merlins ended up in Brit airplanes, such as Lancasters and yes even some Spitfires and Mosquitos. Kinda a fan of the Allison 1710... not slighting the RR variant Merlin, but there are other fine aero engines as well. Also, I'll give the P-51 its due but let's remember that the Mustang was designed as an interceptor and a long range escort fighter. The Spitfire and FW-190 were better dogfighters. It's arguable that the P-47 also was a better dogfighter. It certainly had a better roll rate than the Mustang and it was tougher. There were a LOT of smoking holes in the ground full of Mustangs parts that were sent there by FW-190s, which weren't called "Butcher-Birds" for nothing. By the way, the FW-190 had a better roll rate than any other fighter plane of the war. The Allies were fortunate to have better aero fuels (130+ octane) to exploit higher supercharging, thus make more horsepower, while Germany was having to crack coal to formulate aero fuel during the latter half of the war.
But this isn't AI, the human speaker makes errors as this one did. 6:51 just a few seconds ago. It sounds clear to me and easy to understand and I'm interested in learning more.
I can't get over how repetitive the narration on this video was, at one point the AI said the same exact thing four times in a row just with different sentence structure 😂😅
Don't slight the Allison 1710. At lower levels it was a hot shot. The ground attack variant of the Mustang (A-36 Apache) used an Allison and it did just fine. Later variants of that same Allison with improved supercharging (both turbos and centrifugal) made serious power... and the Allison was a tougher engine. Even today, people rebuilding Merlins for better performance are using Allison connecting rods in the rebuild.
There is always a price to pay. In this case for adding a gearbox, that will probably limit the time between overhaul which will add to maintenance cost.
Not sure the gearbox is as extensive as the P+W one in the overall performance of the new jet design and outcome. Plus seeing the experience with P+W and their gearbox issue plus knowing the reliability that the RR Trent engines have had, meant while a critical addition, RR added more new stuff to offset this risk factor plus RR has had a long term maintenance system in place with its pay by airmile maintenance support
Seems that the video managed to miss the main innovation of the RR ultrafan - it's industry-first variable pitch fan. Keeps talking about the gearbox, but there are other geared turbofan in production today.
I'm still reminded of the time when RR introduced its "revolutionary" new Hi-Bipass turbofan engine that ALSO used new technology materials in the engine... which eventually failed the FOD tests and ended up very nearly causing RR to go bankrupt. Let's hope this time the new tech actually works.
@@OldManGaming69 That would be the one. Their use of pressed carbon fiber in the fan instead of titanium was an attempt to save weight because the 211 was a heavy engine even with the lightweight carbon fan and the extra weight of a titanium fan would put it over the target weight applications RR was shooting for. I don't remember the exact details seeing as how I'd read the rather extensive report around 40+ years ago so some details are a bit fuzzy. Interesting how the 211 in its later incarnations became a success and showed up on a variety of aircraft after RR got things back in order. RR does make good stuff... the early carbon fan just wasn't the answer then.
Ultrafan is a demonstrator prototype, light years from certification and installation on any commercial airframe. Good luck Brits with this, GE owns the widebody market, for better or worse
Rolls-Royce, a wonderful Competitive Company. It is a British Company Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, no longer connected to the Car Company which is owned by BMW
i see what they did with the planetary gear system, they reduce the N1 turbine speed to never exceed supersonic speed, so they can go faster at a higher altitude but with the use of more weight to make it happen. its kind of counter-intuitive in a way but always a step forward to more fuel efficient flight..
keep in mind, the speed of sound (supersonic) depends on temperature, atmospheric pressure, and air density, so its actually going faster than if it were flying near sea level
Just a guess but the three gears in the RR engine are going to be troublesome. Like when Chevy went to a ten speed automatic for their new trucks.. Complexity is trouble.
This is such a waste of time, this video is so annoyingly lazy using obviously AI generated narration that is illogical, disjointed and super repetitive using lots of words without actually saying anything. What a shit video
Pronunciation of the colon in a ratio as if it were regular punctuation is just laughable. Clearly, nobody even listened to the result before just pushing it out !! Perhaps they're not up to assessing results in English ?
Sounds promising, but get back to me with actual certification flight testing and in-service performance data. Until then, performance characteristics as stated by RR are design goals and marketing department promises.
@@michaelshore2300 Please share with us the RR German comment. Are you implying that this engine was designed and developed in German for some reason??
Well they were the First in the world to develop a Reliable working jet engine, so its fitting to expect n correct to expect them to lead the industry, WELL DONE RR WELL DONE GB
@@takis-t2g GE gave Widdle their hydromechanical fuel pump and stopped research on their centrifugal compressor. Because they were ordered by the U.S.ARMY Aircorps to get the development done on the turbosuperchargers they were working on for the P-38. Which was named "Lightning" by the British Because the first couple of Squadrons of P-38's lacked the turbosupercharges and they were dogs. The name "Lightning " was Britsh sarcasm. Widdle knew how to build the turbine as dadapted from Steam turbine. You have to control t the fuel system to control a turbine engine. You know you can go get a degree in Aviation Maintenance Technologies like I got. Or you can stop being lazy and search.
@@takis-t2g in December 15, 2017. I was ambushed by the vice president of the Irkurt Aircraft corporation in charge of Sales into giving a speech At the public introduction of the MC-21-300 Russian Airliner in Zhukovsky Airport Moscow and I had no idea that I was going to speak 😳 😀 but I did give a 15 talk about the history of Russian Aviation in Moscow and I got a standing ovation and I helped sell 5 billion dollars worth of Russian Airliners and 105 Pratt and Whitney engines
Sorry RR but the first company to develop and commercialize a geared turbofan (GTF) engine was Pratt & Whitney, a division of Raytheon Technologies. Their Pratt & Whitney PW1000G engine, branded as the PurePower® engine family, was the first geared turbofan to enter commercial service
Yes P+W and MTU the german engine maker did the design based on a P+W engine. RR is not claiming its the first but it is the only other current commercial jet engine due to have a geared turbofan
Thanks for not adding background music. But the voice repeats itself. AI I assume. I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot,
The GE9X engine for the new 777 puts out more thrust than the so-called ultrafan and it is also a lighter engine. The bigger fan has more frontal area which means more drag going thru the air with the ultrafan.
@@FLIGAVIA That is what I wrote in my original post-! The GE-9X is also lighter. WHY DONT YOU MENTION THAT THE GE9X IS A MORE TECHNALOGICALLY ADVANCED ENGINE AND ALSO HAS MORE THRUST AND IS LIGHTER THAN THE ULTRAFAN. You lead one to believe that you are getting paid for promoting RR.
That was based on poor engineering trying to ram bigger engines in an old design. Everything right down to the landing gear should have been redesigned. Instead, Boeing has turned into cutting costs to feed back to the stockholders. MCAS was designed to compensate for the lack of redesign engineering for the 737
if a new engine doesn't fit... it requires a new airplane design. In part what caused the "early end" of the 380 that could not handle the GE9X. Now, (if I remember correctly) the ultrafan has been specifically designed to fit under the A350. 🤔
Boeing specifically accommodated larger engines by having longer undercarriage when it designed the 757. That was nearly 50 years ago and what did they learn ?
I look at all the gleaming machined rare material spinning parts, and imagine instead, a single electric motor direct driving a 30:1 bypass ratio (around the small motor) fan turning at ideal speed for operating mode, and wings stuffed with CATL’s 500 WHr/kg Li-ion batteries, or better yet, some in-the-works solid-state batteries. Goodbye noise and pollution.
Don't forget that the RB211 almost bankrupted both Lockheed and RR. It was a complete mess. I saw this engine on the 747 flying testbed in Tucson. It is really large compared to the Trent. Aircraft innovation through history is always driven by propulsion innovation. I look forward to seeing the next generation of widebody aircraft. Thanks
Overall, very interesting video....but the number of times things were repeated make me wonder if a plan/script was written or this was just an ad hoc video.
@martinandersson5278 I know they do....I used to work for them....on the older p100 and it's bigger brother....we were a Mro facility and the geared turbo fan killed us off and the facility shut and the jobs moved to the states and Singapore unfortunately ....I loved the job.
It's amazing that GE can make a jet engine competitive with Rolls Royce. They can't even make a good microwave.... I remember the Rolls engines in the early 2000's Gulfstream G-IVs. They were beasts!!! I think most Gulfstreams these days use the GE engine... Go figure.
Just because they have the same logo doesn't mean they have anything in common. Products are as good as their engineers and budgets allow them to be. Capitalist management decided to cripple their home appliances to increase profits. They can't get away with that for jet engines.
@@HyenaEmpyema As I recall, the fall of GE appliances had nothing do with "capitalist management". Besides, what is that exactly? Their problems started when they hired a woke female pakistani CEO. Also, the huge loan they took out from Buffett back in 08 at 10 percent interest didn't help either. Maybe Russia or China, good murdering communist countries, can make some great appliances?
Except we'll soon know if the results over the GE are correct once its in deployment on one commercial jet. THe 9x was designed from 2012-8 so its new but we will know soon. At present all we have is RR claims
Waahoo - at 4:00 and on a bit, I can see this was filmed at one of the factories where I supplied the "Morris" overhead cranes. They're still looking good considering that was back in 2007 !
Whats the point !!!!! with starmer taxing the guts out of the UK there really is no one who could possibly afford to fly again, especially in any kind of RR engine based aircraft.
Amazes me how we're able to create such complex pieces of machinery. Mad really. I struggle to put a shelf up at home and there's guys out there making these things. Crazy.
They do things we can't imagine humans can do! Human creativity is amazing!
it's not human, all their tech, ideas and designs come form conjuring, via alters and ceremonial magik..sourcery...starting even before egypt, atlantis...via non-human elemental etheral forces..and with that is at a high cost of human sack-raf-ices.
@@TheUrantia001 i agree with the high cost of human sacrifices. Nearly all technology improvements come with their share of stiffs. The only way you learn is by making mistakes.
I worked on a big project with Rolls-Royce jet engines and the United States government. The project was very high-pressure. Deadlines were incredibly tight making deliveries at 1 to 3 AM in the morning so we can get them in testing when the team showed up, and of course, being aviation everything had to be perfect and extremely well documented. The security surrounding it is definitely next level. It was a great project when I am very proud of, I was given an extremely special gift from the project as a bonus, under the terms and conditions, it would remain in a private public area. It is my number one Pease in my collection of manufactured parts. I worked on in a 38 year career.
You are amazing! Wishing you success in your work! Have a great day!
Ai readers suck..
Snap, all this time I thought this guy was making bank narrating so many different videos and channels 😂
It turns me off.
Immediately blocked
Has anyone at Rolls ever reviewed these ads PRIOR to airing them? Somehow...I doubt it. 😮
Increase video speed
I love Rolls Royce engines, and I love all companies that make all our lives safer and easier.
Das geht schwer zusammen wen man die Kommentare liest.
unfortunately ITS NOT the companies of the UK who can make our lives safer, ITS ALL DOWN TO THE liebor party, who are continually making the UK as UNSAFE AS THEY CAN, by 'importing' the invasion forces daily.
There's always a history changing event for aviation on RUclips....
The biggest issue is that the initial engines are aimed at large wide body powertrain demands. RR needs to offer at least one smaller version fast in order to offer at least one option for narrow body planes to which there are the biggest order backlogs. With so many backlogs, those ordering now can afford to wait and see what RR offers and see if Airbus and Boeing will offer them as options. Plus a new supplier offers to cut some of the scarcity of the engines. Airbus is already cutting its output due mostly to waiting for engines to be on offer. We can see that airlines are willing to use long range narrow body jets on long range routes as customers will suffer this space for ticket prices. RR may also be the first to truly offer a jet engine built to run on SAF. At present engines are being modified to run on SAF. Having an engine built to run easier on SAF means less risk and offers an airline a jet to test this new fuel on.
The Biggest drawback is the engine size no matter the performance. There is a limit on jet size and plane logistics that can keep adding a taller engine. RR is also new to commercial geared jet engine unlike the current Pratt and Whitney engine which while it has suffered reliability and design launch issues offers P+W early understanding of these challenges and we all know the gearbox offers a significant advantage against just better blades and internal combustion improvements.
Good comment, RR bailed on participating with P&W on GTF architecture and went their own way after IAE buyout. Focusing only on high thrust applications is a mistake going against GE with their enormous resources and market clout with GE90/GenX. The P&W GTF gearbox was never the issue, it was designing the rest of the engine like a Ferrari when a Honda Accord would have worked just fine.
My number one concern with aero jet engines is , especially large commercial passenger planes is reliability . I don't care how little fuel it consumes , how pretty it looks , how powerful it is . Only how reliable it is and gets me to my destination safely .Also I do not believe that the reduced operating costs of the new engines will be reflected in reduced air fares , why should they ? IT has NOT happened in the past . The only thing that has lowered air ticket prices is volume !
I drove a truck in the 80's with a Rolls Royce Eagle diesel engine, it was ultra reliable never broke down while I had it.
where?
@@fjp3305 BRS Knottingley
Don’t waste your time watching the entire video everything that could’ve been said about the new engine could have been completed and less than four sentences instead of continually repeating the same mantra over and over again
Thanks for your comment!
@@FLIGAVIA?
Despite some of the negativity displayed here this makes me proud to be British.
What is British?
It is not a nationality because there is no such country as Britain.
Britain is a union of countries, and is the first step towards European Union (another "union", not a country).
The European Union was the next step towards global union, or the New World Order.
I am English.
Best to be either English, Scottish, Irish, or Welsh.
We can still get along together!
(Apologies for my rant ...)
And the North American P-51 Mustang 🙂
The BMW 601 series of engines was superior to the merlin.
THE BEST OF THE BEST GREAT NEWS
Exactly man
The American P51 (known as the Mustang when delivered to the UK) was a very average fighter with its Allison engine, especially at height. But when fitted with the Rolls Royce Merlin engine by the British ( as fitted to the Spitfire and other important planes) it was transformed into perhaps the best piston engined fighter plane of the Second World War.
Thanks so much for the helpful information!
In wartime- time is crucial. Fitting an existing proven engine was an easier decision than hoping US engine makers could deliver the same in such a short window to make a war outcome difference and avoid more US airmen being killed with the existing engine
and your parallel to 2025 gas turbine engine technology is what exactly? It's not 1945 anymore Toto.
Let's not forget that the production Mustangs used Merlins made by Packard. Not only that, but a lot of Packard Merlins ended up in Brit airplanes, such as Lancasters and yes even some Spitfires and Mosquitos.
Kinda a fan of the Allison 1710... not slighting the RR variant Merlin, but there are other fine aero engines as well. Also, I'll give the P-51 its due but let's remember that the Mustang was designed as an interceptor and a long range escort fighter. The Spitfire and FW-190 were better dogfighters. It's arguable that the P-47 also was a better dogfighter. It certainly had a better roll rate than the Mustang and it was tougher. There were a LOT of smoking holes in the ground full of Mustangs parts that were sent there by FW-190s, which weren't called "Butcher-Birds" for nothing. By the way, the FW-190 had a better roll rate than any other fighter plane of the war. The Allies were fortunate to have better aero fuels (130+ octane) to exploit higher supercharging, thus make more horsepower, while Germany was having to crack coal to formulate aero fuel during the latter half of the war.
@Flugavia. … the gentleman’s comment was a response to the predictable sour grapes reaponses to successful non-US technology.
AI narration is unlistenable 😢
Exactly…and I went straight here…all AI FLUFF LANGUAGE. AWFUL VIDEO
But this isn't AI, the human speaker makes errors as this one did. 6:51 just a few seconds ago. It sounds clear to me and easy to understand and I'm interested in learning more.
I can't get over how repetitive the narration on this video was, at one point the AI said the same exact thing four times in a row just with different sentence structure 😂😅
Sorry for that.
We would like to thank Rolls Royce for sponsoring this video
Oh we lacked of it.
Go Rolls- Royce once again you are the best,back in WW2 the Mustang was not much to shout about until a Rolls Royce Merlin was fitted, Say no more.
Legendary!
Don't slight the Allison 1710. At lower levels it was a hot shot. The ground attack variant of the Mustang (A-36 Apache) used an Allison and it did just fine. Later variants of that same Allison with improved supercharging (both turbos and centrifugal) made serious power... and the Allison was a tougher engine. Even today, people rebuilding Merlins for better performance are using Allison connecting rods in the rebuild.
I remember the a380 abandoned RR for GE engines when they failed early
There is always a price to pay. In this case for adding a gearbox, that will probably limit the time between overhaul which will add to maintenance cost.
Yes.
Not sure the gearbox is as extensive as the P+W one in the overall performance of the new jet design and outcome. Plus seeing the experience with P+W and their gearbox issue plus knowing the reliability that the RR Trent engines have had, meant while a critical addition, RR added more new stuff to offset this risk factor plus RR has had a long term maintenance system in place with its pay by airmile maintenance support
Seems that the video managed to miss the main innovation of the RR ultrafan - it's industry-first variable pitch fan. Keeps talking about the gearbox, but there are other geared turbofan in production today.
Thanks for reminding
2 Minute video stretched to 12 :(
China called and said thanks for all the design details and drawings, they are getting to work on their plagiarized copy right now.
Note the RB211 used on the B747 was a three spooled engine also.
Thanks for the news!
Noise reduction and 20 % more efficient are impressive. Meanwhile environmental friendly.
Repetitive commentary. This was a 5~6 min. viddy stretched to 12+ mins. 👎
AI reading Rolls Royce promotional blurb.
Fantastic tradition 💪💪
Interesting... comments and superb video showing how far technology has come and how little fuel is needed now.
I'm still reminded of the time when RR introduced its "revolutionary" new Hi-Bipass turbofan engine that ALSO used new technology materials in the engine... which eventually failed the FOD tests and ended up very nearly causing RR to go bankrupt. Let's hope this time the new tech actually works.
That's why you test isn't it? Are you talking about the RB211 in the 70's?
@@OldManGaming69 That would be the one. Their use of pressed carbon fiber in the fan instead of titanium was an attempt to save weight because the 211 was a heavy engine even with the lightweight carbon fan and the extra weight of a titanium fan would put it over the target weight applications RR was shooting for. I don't remember the exact details seeing as how I'd read the rather extensive report around 40+ years ago so some details are a bit fuzzy. Interesting how the 211 in its later incarnations became a success and showed up on a variety of aircraft after RR got things back in order. RR does make good stuff... the early carbon fan just wasn't the answer then.
Ultrafan is just a fancy name for a geared fan which have been in service for a long time and long before Rolls Royce ever thought of the idea.
Ultrafan is a demonstrator prototype, light years from certification and installation on any commercial airframe. Good luck Brits with this, GE owns the widebody market, for better or worse
@@justwantresults8768 For better.
@@John-nc4bl For worse. Americans can't even build safe airline planes anymore. LMAO!
As long as DEI doesn't take place , Rolls-Royce should continue to be number 1
Yap dog
Rolls-Royce, a wonderful Competitive Company. It is a British Company Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, no longer connected to the Car Company which is owned by BMW
The split occurred long before BMW gained ownership, it happened in 1973 in fact.
i see what they did with the planetary gear system, they reduce the N1 turbine speed to never exceed supersonic speed, so they can go faster at a higher altitude but with the use of more weight to make it happen. its kind of counter-intuitive in a way but always a step forward to more fuel efficient flight..
keep in mind, the speed of sound (supersonic) depends on temperature, atmospheric pressure, and air density, so its actually going faster than if it were flying near sea level
Well done, thanks.
Now lets talk about the plane redesign that can handle this huge engine.
Waiting to Airbus!
Well it must be superior because it has cool blue fan blades and a swirl mark.
Just a guess but the three gears in the RR engine are going to be troublesome. Like when Chevy went to a ten speed automatic for their new trucks.. Complexity is trouble.
Put them on 747's. Boeing should love that right now.
Never again since RR was a total failure on the 787.
The engine might be brilliant but that was 12:23 of buzzwords and meaningless marketing bollocks.
Btw thanks a lot for your feedback :)
It uses carbon composite with titanium edges blades unlike the competitor that uses carbon composite with titanium edges
Repeated the info multiple times 😕
That's chat gpt for you
Who's supplying the new replacements for the B-52 retro-fit?
Ultra Fan lower thrust than Gen X positions it well for an A350 Neo where as the Gen X suits the bigger heavier 777X.
But Ultrafan is so big that I don't think A350 is entirely feasible.
This is such a waste of time, this video is so annoyingly lazy using obviously AI generated narration that is illogical, disjointed and super repetitive using lots of words without actually saying anything. What a shit video
Pronunciation of the colon in a ratio as if it were regular punctuation is just laughable.
Clearly, nobody even listened to the result before just pushing it out !!
Perhaps they're not up to assessing results in English ?
@@ppeglar2 AI voice = uploader not being able to speak more than a dozen words of English.
PS.
I am not joking.
I'd like to see a new 747 series equipped with 2 of these new RR engines if they have enough thrust to do that. If not, then 4
It will never happen.
‘High bypass turbine’? That’s a new one on me.
Marketing/promo stuff, let's see GE's side of the story next
Sounds promising, but get back to me with actual certification flight testing and in-service performance data. Until then, performance characteristics as stated by RR are design goals and marketing department promises.
good video man, however if i remember correctly rolls-royce also supplied engines for upgraded b-52s 😉😉😉
RR Germany engine msde In RR America.
Thanks a lot! Should I make a video about b52😎
@@michaelshore2300 Please share with us the RR German comment. Are you implying that this engine was designed and developed in German for some reason??
@@BJHolloway1 RR design, built in the USA.
RR was making engines for planes back to WWI
Und das nicht forgessen za BMW engines.
@@bartsolari5035 BMW601, copied by both Russia and China.
Advert for RR?
I want to have that chance!
Well they were the First in the world to develop a Reliable working jet engine, so its fitting to expect n correct to expect them to lead the industry, WELL DONE RR WELL DONE GB
@@takis-t2g Nope Lockheed L-1000 first axial flow jet engine with afterburner 1939.
The Airforce refused it for propeller aircraft.
@@faranger If so why then both the Russians (MIG 15) n the American Saber both use RR or a oppy of the RR jet engine?
@@takis-t2g GE gave Widdle their hydromechanical fuel pump and stopped research on their centrifugal compressor.
Because they were ordered by the U.S.ARMY Aircorps to get the development done on the turbosuperchargers they were working on for the P-38.
Which was named "Lightning" by the British Because the first couple of Squadrons of P-38's lacked the turbosupercharges and they were dogs.
The name "Lightning " was Britsh sarcasm. Widdle knew how to build the turbine as dadapted from Steam turbine.
You have to control t the fuel system to control a turbine engine.
You know you can go get a degree in Aviation Maintenance Technologies like I got.
Or you can stop being lazy and search.
@@takis-t2g The Russians won their engines in a billiards 🎱 game. True Story
@@takis-t2g in December 15, 2017.
I was ambushed by the vice president of the Irkurt Aircraft corporation in charge of Sales into giving a speech At the public introduction of the MC-21-300 Russian Airliner in Zhukovsky Airport Moscow and I had no idea that I was going to speak 😳 😀 but I did give a 15 talk about the history of Russian Aviation in Moscow and I got a standing ovation and I helped sell 5 billion dollars worth of Russian Airliners and 105 Pratt and Whitney engines
Sorry RR but the first company to develop and commercialize a geared turbofan (GTF) engine was Pratt & Whitney, a division of Raytheon Technologies. Their Pratt & Whitney PW1000G engine, branded as the PurePower® engine family, was the first geared turbofan to enter commercial service
And a German company now
Yes P+W and MTU the german engine maker did the design based on a P+W engine. RR is not claiming its the first but it is the only other current commercial jet engine due to have a geared turbofan
Thanks for not adding background music. But the voice repeats itself. AI I assume. I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot,
I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot,
I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot, I am a robot,
I am a robot,
Is his intonation that bad? Thanks for the comment!
In Thrust We Trust.
I still have a few posters with this slogan from my years working at Pratt & Whitney back in the day.
The GE9X engine for the new 777 puts out more thrust than the so-called ultrafan and it is also a lighter engine.
The bigger fan has more frontal area which means more drag going thru the air with the ultrafan.
GE9X has a stronger thrust is true.
@@FLIGAVIA That is what I wrote in my original post-!
The GE-9X is also lighter.
WHY DONT YOU MENTION THAT THE GE9X IS A MORE TECHNALOGICALLY ADVANCED ENGINE AND ALSO HAS MORE THRUST AND IS LIGHTER THAN THE ULTRAFAN. You lead one to believe that you are getting paid for promoting RR.
I'm wondering about the overall larger size of the engine...wasn't that the problem with the retro fitted 737's? Leading to the whole MCAS debacle.
That was based on poor engineering trying to ram bigger engines in an old design. Everything right down to the landing gear should have been redesigned. Instead, Boeing has turned into cutting costs to feed back to the stockholders. MCAS was designed to compensate for the lack of redesign engineering for the 737
if a new engine doesn't fit... it requires a new airplane design. In part what caused the "early end" of the 380 that could not handle the GE9X. Now, (if I remember correctly) the ultrafan has been specifically designed to fit under the A350. 🤔
Boeing specifically accommodated larger engines by having longer undercarriage when it designed the 757. That was nearly 50 years ago and what did they learn ?
I look at all the gleaming machined rare material spinning parts, and imagine instead, a single electric motor direct driving a 30:1 bypass ratio (around the small motor) fan turning at ideal speed for operating mode, and wings stuffed with CATL’s 500 WHr/kg Li-ion batteries, or better yet, some in-the-works solid-state batteries. Goodbye noise and pollution.
@@eddiegardner8232 What will you be charging these batteries with? And how long will it take? (Do the math) ;-)
Don't forget that the RB211 almost bankrupted both Lockheed and RR. It was a complete mess.
I saw this engine on the 747 flying testbed in Tucson. It is really large compared to the Trent. Aircraft innovation through history is always driven by propulsion innovation. I look forward to seeing the next generation of widebody aircraft. Thanks
I can’t forget.
My dad was an engineer on he RB211 project in Derby at that time. I was very young, so not aware of how bad things were.
World beating... where did I hear that before.....
I wonder if teh ultrafan will be scaled down in size so it can be fitted into smaller jets like the Global 8000 and Falcon 2000LXS?
This about like I got a Porsche engine in my vacuum cleaner,
Stopped watching after hearing stupid AI generated fake voice
There is an error in the illustration of the Vimy bomber at 0:35: for some reason Snoopy is missing from the picture.
Dont forget to mention how RR nearly busted Norwegian due to cracks found on fan blades.
"nearly busted Norwegian ? What?
The repetition tells me I'm listening to AI.
The same thing repeated about ten times. Shite vid
Well if it flys a plane at 2000 mph I would be very happy
We have taken a massive step backwards since concord blew
Get a real person to narrate these, or else teach AI to read things better.
Noted!
Yes, I'll echo that sentiment. Dreadful voice over.
I will NOT watch anything narrated by AI. I can tell right away. Instantly turn the video off.
Overall, very interesting video....but the number of times things were repeated make me wonder if a plan/script was written or this was just an ad hoc video.
How many times do we need to hear the same information?
Yea
The geared turbo fan was a Pratt innovation.
Pratt used a planetary gearbox, complete different story
And the have massive problems with it
@martinandersson5278 I know they do....I used to work for them....on the older p100 and it's bigger brother....we were a Mro facility and the geared turbo fan killed us off and the facility shut and the jobs moved to the states and Singapore unfortunately ....I loved the job.
Smart a... comments are easy, they would not get you through the front door of RR.
Love RR
Wow, Rolls-Royce is making an engine just like GE. I think they call that copying.
You did not watch the video
The real star of this video is the narrator. So nice to hear a skilled human speaker.
Really?
@motive440 I assume you are being sarcastic.
@motive440 You win the sarcasm prize.
This must be tenth time in the last year I have seen a ‘new’ technology which is going to revolutionize the aviation industry ! 😂😂
It's amazing that GE can make a jet engine competitive with Rolls Royce. They can't even make a good microwave.... I remember the Rolls engines in the early 2000's Gulfstream G-IVs. They were beasts!!! I think most Gulfstreams these days use the GE engine... Go figure.
Everyone has their own era then a new beast appears!
Just because they have the same logo doesn't mean they have anything in common. Products are as good as their engineers and budgets allow them to be. Capitalist management decided to cripple their home appliances to increase profits. They can't get away with that for jet engines.
@@HyenaEmpyema As I recall, the fall of GE appliances had nothing do with "capitalist management". Besides, what is that exactly? Their problems started when they hired a woke female pakistani CEO. Also, the huge loan they took out from Buffett back in 08 at 10 percent interest didn't help either. Maybe Russia or China, good murdering communist countries, can make some great appliances?
Where is the antigravitic engine used in the TR3B?
Damn computer narrations are giving me the shits.
AI voice = uploader not being able to speak more than a dozen words of English.
video ruined by crap AI narration
This is really an advertisement.
And poorly narrated
Looking forward to promoting RR in the future. Just thinking about it makes the future feel open.
I hope they do a new A380 with these engines
There are many rumors about that…
@FLIGAVIA unfortunately it is almost certain it won't happen, but one can only wish...
Won't happen, Airbus outdated by large twins
What aircraft is the ultra fan going on?
Cessna 152.
the world's biggest glider, dead stick landing anyone?
Except, GE-90 is like decades old design and GE-9x achieves most of it even without more sophisticated stuff.
Except we'll soon know if the results over the GE are correct once its in deployment on one commercial jet. THe 9x was designed from 2012-8 so its new but we will know soon. At present all we have is RR claims
@@stephendoherty8291 The GE9X is a lighter engine than the so-called rr geared fan and the GE9X produces more thrust than the rr geared fan.
No. Revolutionise.
Not in the USA. Revolutionize is correct.
information is good but way too repetitive
If they turned the engine around on that truck it would go faster.
Waahoo - at 4:00 and on a bit, I can see this was filmed at one of the factories where I supplied the "Morris" overhead cranes. They're still looking good considering that was back in 2007 !
Wow!
Whats the point !!!!! with starmer taxing the guts out of the UK there really is no one who could possibly afford to fly again, especially in any kind of RR engine based aircraft.
Serves the Brits right for voting Labor
Silly comment. Domestic tax policies has nothing to do with export of superlative technology.
@johnryman. … and US citizens voted for a half dead stumbling zombie didn’t they, before getting Trump.
@Jack-bs6zb Cant you read & understand the subject matter or is it beyond your capabilities.
@@jamesbowskill362 ... i can certainly read and understand writing which properly reflects cogent thinking. The confusion is all yours.
To many people like running their mouths off showing they haven't got a clue what they are talking about.
Pratt and Whitney made it first with PW G1000 geared fan engine!
I wonder is RR will be able to provide spares for this engine. They can't provide spares for the Trent.
Did you say it has ceramic matrix composites and carbon titanium fanblades?
8:30 Clearly AI has no idea how to pronounce a ratio. Don't use it mate.
3:10 "Bringing it to life in the Trent engine family in the during the *_nineteen-ninety._* "
Yet one more series of stock photos and AI voice.
Installation Date?
always padding, just get to the point
Ten minutes of repetition!
Thanks for being repetitive. You should pay me for wasting my life having to hear things things 3-4 times. What did I repeat?
Rolls royce "Spey" was a three shaft turbine.
Nah. Had 2 shafts pal. Same as it's successor the Tay engine