This video is a remake of a video from about a month ago where we explored how Titanic’s engines worked. Some annoying issues and missed points have been eating me up though so I decided to see out the year by revisiting the subject and overhauling the video with new additions and information. Enjoy and happy new year!
Nice one, I fully understand how something can weigh on your mind if you're not happy with it. Glad you got the chance to revisit it. You've done awesome work this year, I hope next year is just as great!
Aaaaah Mr. Brady I had a feeling you'd end up doing this after the corrections video appeared. This is one of the things that really sets you apart is being driven enough to fully redo something rather than let it stand with corrections elsewhere. Great work!
the fact that he remade it and still didn't put in the fact that it was the Olympic that sank and not the Titanic, shows that his research was not very thorough, either that or he got paid something on the side to keep the lie going.
This really is a tour de force. Whoever made this deserves tremendous success. The combination of old photos. amazing CGI and excellent dialogue and reading is almost unsurpassable. Thank you for this labor of love.
This video is a masterclass on Titanic’s propulsion machinery, but so thoughtfully presented that it’s easy to understand the complex technology. So glad I found this channel, which is one of my favorite subscriptions! Excellent production and narration!
As an industrial Millwright and a man obsessed with Titanic, this is one of the most interesting and best made videos I've ever watched. The attention to the details, the CGI with the engineering drawings, the obvious level of research and care to get this right, this was fantastic. I learned so much here that I never knew before, thank you!
I too (was) a Millwright / Rigger for Alltek . We worked with corrugators . I often think about the folks in the future . If all hell breaks loose again , we wipe ourselves nearly out where we have to start over . What would those folks think when they dredge this thing up ? We are amazed with Pyramids . Imagine finding this with no real context .
Well done to Mike for accepting his mistakes, addressing them, and then rereleasing this masterful video with the information that he had learned. Kudos to you, Mike!
he made the biggest mistake of all, the Titanic never sank, it was the sister ship Olympic that was sunk on purpose; maybe do some digging next time Mike and not just regurgitate propaganda?
@@Turbo_Tastic It’s been proven several times that it was in fact Titanic that sank and not Olympic. There are visual differences on the wreck, you can see the yard number 401 on the outboard propellers, and they couldn’t have switched the two around in the short amount of time Olympic returned to Belfast.
@@PainHurtss for anyone intersted go watch The Best Titanic Conspiracy Documentary (2012). youtube won't even let me post this in a response, going to check to see if my comment gets deleted
@@PainHurtss proven; nothing can be proven, they can provide evidence that makes something likely or unlikely. The video seems to be well done, but he may as well be analyzing Santa's Sleight or the Star Ship Enterprises's engines, it is all fiction if he doesn't even know what ship it was.
I am not even finished yet but I just wanted to say that this video is an absolute masterpiece. The script and flow of the narrative is wonderful. The animations are immersive and so helpful in feeling like you are actually there on the ship taking this tour. Thank you for producing something with this level of quality, it is almost unimaginable to find this level of information anywhere, let alone on RUclips.
Really got to love the level of engineering in these old ships, don't think people realise that almost everything was moulded by hand 1st then cast afterwards. All done by thousands of skilled workers in tough conditions.
It blows my mind to see such engineering marvels existing in 1912. I'm sure many of us would be in awe to see this process in person. But this video is darn close to it. Awesome work!
even better technology existed over 12,000 years ago, but you will never hear about that, just like you also won't hear that it was the Olympic that sank and not the Titanic
@@jan_777 it goes towards providing supposedly factual information on the Tittanic; if he doesn't even realize what ship sank how can the engine information be accurate? Plus it goes towards the fact that almost everything we are taught is a lie. If you are just enjoying your slavery in the matrix, yes then facts make no difference, enjoy not being alive.
Right! The level of sophistication of shipbuilding of the time is downright astonishing. Especially when you consider 50 years before Titanic the overwhelming majority of oceangoing vessels were still wood-built and sail powered. Columbus could have captained a ship from 1860 but not one from 1910, he'd have been overwhelmed.
@@EnjoySackLunch Think about it. A ship from 1860: Wood, canvas, sails, wind-propelled. The configuration would have been different from a 15th Century caravel but the principles would be the same. A ship from 1910: Steel, steam, electricity, size. Aside from the principles of navigation which wouldn't be too much different the ship handling and propulsion and internal systems would have been alien to Columbus. Not that he couldn't learn of course, but I'm speaking of theoretically dropping him on the bridge cold. Get it?
@@wayneantoniazzi2706 They will be. Size do matter A LOT in ships, so these bigger ships might experience problems never experienced by smaller ones (like being a gigant magnet to ships moving near it). Speed also gone up a lot, so its a gigant brick, moving at incredible speed with no ability to easily change direction or speed, compared to even biggest ships of the previous era.
I am heavily involved with vintage steam machinery, engines etc at the Melbourne Steam Club here in Melbourne Australia, we have two triple expansion ship engines at the museum, both are operational with an output 0f 600hp each, small compared to Titanic but the operation of them gives you an idea of the sound that would have been normal in Titanic's engine room. There are hundreds of checks and ongoing checks to keep these engines operating reliably including lubrication, and using your ears which for the operators was a paramount skill as any change in sound meant an issue. This was a great video, and the CGI was very good giving us a feel for the interior of one of my favourite ships.
I am totally in all of the massive scale of these engines. What also, amazed me were the conditions that the firemen worked in. I have been in 47° heat and had to quickly go inside. These men worked in 49° heat for four hours. Can you imagine the massive strain😂 that this would’ve had on their bodies.
as a veteran of a Sacramento class fast combat support ship, i find the engineering of this ship fascinating. the fact they could do what they did, when they did is absolutely amazing.
@@WorldsBestFisherman152And yet here you are blessing us with your nonsense via the use of electricity, radio communication etc. why don't you just go ahead and throw your phone and car in the sea you ingrate. I'm sure god would approve.
That 3d fly-though from the stack down to the engine room was amazing. I had to re-watch it on my 70 inch TV so I could appreciate these epic graphics!
Maudlin comments about the Titanic aside, it’s even cooler to think about how these same engines on board the Olympic were used in a combat scenario. The engines empowered Olympic to quickly overtake, ram, and sink a German sub (U-103) during WWI, accomplishing this feat not by firing weapons, but simply using the raw strength and engineering capabilities of the engines themselves. Olympic is still the only ocean liner in history to ever accomplish such a move. I wish your videos highlighted the amazing history of Titanic’s unsung sister ship more!
Had a regiment of US infantry aboard, who later sent a bronze plaque to Olympic commemorating her feat. I think that plaque still exists today, though I don't know where. It read: “This tablet presented by the 59th Regiment United States Infantry commemorates the sinking of the German submarine U-103 by the Olympic on May 12th, 1918 in latitude 49 degrees 16 minutes north longitude 4 degrees 51 minutes west on the voyage from New York to Southampton with American troops."
Also as much a testament to Captain Bertram Hayes and his skill as a mariner. Every sailor in every military division of the whole British Empire was taught to attempt that procedure when facing a U-boat, but IKS SM-U103 was the only one that didn't manage to escape.
@@DistractedGlobeGuy Indeed!! In fact, in his autobiography, Sir Hayes says they actually sunk TWO submarines; according to him, the submarine they hit got basically sliced in two, with both halves going vertical before sinking. He says the U-103 is the one that was spotted behind them, which they opened fire on and damaged enough that it eventually sank, although a portion of that crew survived (including the U-boat commander). Honestly it makes a bit more sense to me! The events with a single u-boat never were very clear, in terms of HOW it was hit. Hayes acknowledges that most say he only sank one, but he also basically said he already got a pretty big honor out of it and wasn't going to press the issue, lol!
Most would think that this "tired" subject of the RMS Titanic would draw no interest, but you have a way of presenting details that draws me in and makes me a superfan! Thank you.
Incredible engineering, and all built on site! Remarkable. RIP to all the engineers, stokers and crew that went down bravely with their ship, what a terrible sadness.
Okay, I knew she used a feed water system, I knew she used a low pressure turbine, I knew she had condensers... I don't think I had as yet fully grasped the concept of how she was staged up to increase draft just by passing steam. THAT is some helpful info... Yet another example of the difference between knowledge and comprehension. Your efforts are highly appreciated Mike. I may not be able to pass over cash to you directly, but I'll make dang sure to watch it thrice and let ads play... it's all I can do, hope it helps.
An incredibly complex machine system broken down and logically presented in terms the layman can understand - not n easy task, yet Mike has done it so well ! Ongoing thanks for your most impressive efforts, Mike !
If you see all the thousands of tons of coal it needed its equal to just an icecube sized block of uranium 235 for the entire trip. Shows you how far we've come...
Excellent summary. Thank you. The first ship I sailed in with the Canadian Navy was a WW2 frigate then used as a training ship. It had 2 triple expansion engines and two pressurized boiler rooms and all auxillaries were steam driven as well. It was fascinating to be down below to see it all running. As part of our training, We spent a lot of time in the machinery spaces to learn how it all ran. Even now I'm involved with a wooden hulled steam tug in Vancouver with a triple expansion engine.
Another great video, Mike. It would be interesting, in a future video, to explore the differences in efficiency and machinery on Olympic , between her original coal fired set up, and after her 1920 refit and conversion to oil.
It's the first time I've seen any of this channels videos and I must applaud the incredible journey it takes with immaculate CG animation, clear historic footage and well polished narration, such a pleasure to watch, amazing work there!
Mike, this complex technology blew my mind that it occurred in the late 19th and early 20th century. As always, thank you very much for your knowledge and determination!!!
Always been fascinated by the Titanic.. Was on many passenger ships as a kid.. their colossal size and majesty was always a thrill to me. Plus I like mechanics.. and how things work.. Thanks for the tour!
I appreciate the obvious HARD WORK and research in making this video. It's incredible how these engines were built. I did not realize how the castings were made. Amazing craftsmanship over 112 years ago. Sharing with everyone I know. Watching from the Philippines
I adore this channel ! I binge watched every video when i found our friend Mike. I love anything to do with history and learning how people lived and worked in the past. Mike is so good at what he does and when he speaks ,its as if you are having a personal conversation with him. ❤😊
If you look close the center propeller is turning the wrong way. It may be the actual way it turned, but the blades are wrong @ 32:32 Left hand prop turning right. Still a great Video as always Mike. Just something I noticed after watching the video a few times. Great Info on the Titanic. I never get enough
Wow Mike....your videos never cease to amaze me...great research.... 179 men moving 600 tons is about 3.3 Tons EACH! per day. Not a job I would sign up for. Presentation with narration makes for a very interesting video. I loved the in depth description how these monster engines worked. Casting such enormous engine parts in 1912 is truly mind boggling. I really enjoyed this and gained a lot of information on this magnificent ship. Thanks again..👌
Shifting that weight is not as dramatic as it sounds, but would have been in such awful conditions. At 14 years old I regularly loaded/moved 8 tons of straw bales in a day, and at 62 I can still easily load 1/2 ton of coal from my van to the bunker in 25 minutes. I am quite large but remain far from exceptional amongst the people I have known!
The casting is pretty impressive, but at the end of the day you're still just heating up a bunch of metal and making it into one big lump. I'm really impressed by the machining of it, cutting such massive parts to the precision needed for efficient and reliable operation. Even today that would be difficult, and we have the advantage of advanced materials for cutting tools, digital readouts for machine tool positioning, electric or hydraulic servo drives, and eventually CNC control. As a machinist, I find it fascinating that something so large and powerful could be machined, at a time when high-speed steel was still mostly a laboratory project rather than a commercial product.
@@thedubwhisperer2157We don't use bale thrower wagons, just stack it behind the baler on flat wagon. About 150 bales a load, assume each is 40 lbs gives 6000 lbs or 3 tons a load. Takes about 45 minutes minutes per load so you're moving 4 tons an hour. Keep that up for several hours a day. So Tennessee Ernie Ford's "you load 16 tons, another day older" is entirely realistic. Except shoveling deep in a coal mine is a far worse job than farming.
Yeh 3 tons of coal isn't much at all really although the conditions would've made it much harder Conditions had much improved for the boiler men by 1912 Personally when I was a labourer I would easily mix 15-20 tons of sharp or ballast into screed or concrete in a day It was a busy day and had to work quickly so we didn't over run but I wouldn't say it was particularly daunting
This was a great video. I enjoyed it very much. My grandpa served in the merchant marines during World War II as an engineer. I know he would have loved and definitely would have approved this video.
I've enjoyed watching your videos for a couple years now, and thoroughly enjoyed them and what I learned. But these recent ones focused on Titanic are several levels above your usual great quality and content. Thank you for these, and for keeping alive the memories and knowledge of that time, and doing it in such an entertaining, educational, and respectful way.
Mike, thanks for this vid. Thanks for focusing on the unseen crew that spent almost all their time below decks providing the skill and work it took to make ships like Titanic function. For me they were also hero's, the crew that stayed at their posts during the sinking, keeping the steam pressure up so the lights could be kept on and also keep the pumps going to help slow down the sinking. Thanks again and Happy New Year. mike
You do a great job on your videos with comprehensive narration, historical photos, plans, related images and videos. Helps one visualize how grand that ship was and all the systems required to make it function. It was quite a complex machine.
My original post was about how easy it would've been to avoid the collision. But the entire post seems to have morphed in toilets from my point that the ship struck the berg on the side it was easiest to avoid it.
Honestly, such an impressive design! Absolutely genius! And you did a great job combining it in a documentary! If i watched this instead of the actual movie, it would have been money way better spent. Bravo!
Mike, a wonderful , wonderful video, superbly presented! You are truly a gift to our part of humankind which loves and reveres ocean liners and these magnificent ships in particular. Thank you! Edward Wollenberg, Clarksville, Arkansas, USA.
Very nice Mike. Quite detailed and updated. I'm blown away by the technical advances of the 20th Century. How were they able to get effectively NEGATIVE pressure leftover from the reciprocating engines to run the turbine at an atmospheric pressure lower than ambient?! Wow, she really was a technological advancement and at such awesome fuel savings. The 20th century really was an technological leap forward in so many ways.
Running in the North Atlantic would've helped in this regard, as pulling such frigid water through the condensers would have increased vacuum on the steam side. It's a bit funny that taking in colder water and deliberately dumping heat (the main product of a coal fire) into the ocean actually improved system efficiency, but the engines work on a pressure difference, rather than temperature. To illustrate this, consider that at sea-level atmospheric pressure, water changes to steam, and vice-versa, at 212°F. At higher altitudes, like in the Swiss Alps, water can boil at only 195°F. Titanic's boilers were producing 215 PSI steam at around 400°F. By the time it left the reciprocating triple-expansion engines, the steam was down to 188°F - but because the pressure was so low, it was still steam! After leaving the turbine, it was colder than a cup of tea at around 100°F... but STILL a gas! It wasn't until the condensers dropped the steam to 60°F that it finally returned to water. It was good engineering but not a new concept at the time. The Industrial Revolution started about a century and a half prior, but these concepts go back to the late 1600s and early 1700s: A lot of work is credited to Denis Papin, who, also known for essentially inventing the autoclave, pressure cooker, described a piston steam engine working on these principles in 1690.
At last! A video on the extraordinary engineering of the Olympic class ships! Personally, I find this stuff fascinating and when you look at this machinery, it's also rather elegant too. Thanks for sharing this. I know it's only scratching the surface of a Titanic subject, it would take an effort of Olympic proportions to cover the entire systems. However, please accept the thanks of this Britannic citizen! Happy and healthy New Year too!
Working As an engineer I loved this video.I have a new respect for the incredible engineering task it was.Size does matter in this case . Excellent explanation and very high quality renders!
Fascinating description of the engineering of the Titanic. I have always wondered how fascinating it would be if the Titanic were to be rebuilt as it was. I know it would be an extremely expensive endeavour but fascinating to see. Cheers Mike on another awesome video.👍 absolutely incredible
Well done, Mike! What surprises me is how much advanced technology was used in Titanic's engines. Considering the time in which it was built, it's truly extraordinary. For perspective, it was less than a decade earlier that the Wright's flew for the first time in 1903. Wow!!
Honestly, the engineering genius of Titanic's designers can't be overstated. The genius of how the largest passenger ships afloat at the time could move at near-Cunard speed while burning 40% less coal boggles the mind, that nearly every joule of energy was sucked out of the steam in order to power the ship through the ocean. My interest in Titanic started with how opulent it was and of the hubris of man, but lately I've found the engineering and design of Titanic to be equally as fascinating. The ship stands as a marvel of Victorian/Edwardian engineering, that just about any way man could divine and design a moving system was implemented in some way, shape, or form in one single ship. While there were definitely engineering oversights made, like how the watertight bulkheads ought to have been built higher or there not being ample lifeboat room to evacuate the entire ship, it doesn't take away with the genius it took to create the largest moving object made by the hand of man at the time.
Not just the genius of the designers but also the skill of the craftsmen. Imagine fabricating the patterns for the molds, the skill of the foundry men in pouring the molten steel into them at the right temperature and speed to ensure it flows into very part of mold without leaving any weakening voids. The experince of the machinists in machining the faces of the castings to fine tolerances and then the other tradesman in marking, and drilling hundreds of hole so everything would assemble together. In any one of those steps one mistake would have cost thousands of pounds and put back delivery of the parts, possibly. by weeks
Even though it’s a remake (executed even better than than the original) it makes perfect watching for the commute home after the holidays. Hope you and your team have a lovely new year! Thank you for everything this year, here’s to another year of phenomenal content ✨🎉
Wonderful video. Titanic engines was fascinating me since I saw them running in 1997 movie as a kid. Thank you for ton of amazing details. Funny thing, I think that center propeller is rotating in reverse in all animations :D Or its maybe just my impression. Everything best in the new year for all of you guys!
Such comprehensive, exhaustive research obviously went into this video, to say nothing of its marvellously accurate visual component. Really well done! Thank you.
Well done!!! Having the honesty to admit and correct errors is a sign of integrity. And while the trolls will mock you, the rest of us will salute you for it.
192 men shovelled 600 tons of coal a day.. that’s just over 3 tons of coal per man, per day, in conditions equal to hell itself.. those were true men, ESPECIALLY on the night/morning of the 13/14th of August 1912.. each one of em stayed at their boilers almost right up to the end.. some of them DID stay right until she split in half, and made the ultimate sacrifice so the people up top had a chance to survive the night
Mike: Would you consider doing a video on survivability in general, along with specific regards to Charles Lightoller? By all accounts anyone who had to be fished out of the drink, or clung to a boat that night should have been gone long before Carpathia arrived. Twenty eight degree water, an air temperature in the low 30's, yet after being sucked under water and nearly drowned, he makes it to an overturned collapsible, takes command, hours later hooks up with another boat, transfers all to that, and is the last person to board Carpathia. How could he do this? Even Bride lived with, I believe, severe cold injuries to his foot. Obviously getting out of the water was the only hope, but still, these people were soaked. How did they not all succumb to hypothermia? I think a look at Lights and others who defied the odds would be pretty interesting. Regards.
How did Lightoller manage all that? I'll tell you, adrenaline and command responsibility. Both can keep you going longer than you might think. Trust me, I know from personal experience. (But not like Lightollers!) Lightoller stayed alive, functioning, and providing leadership because somebody had to and that somebody was HIM. Sometimes that's all there is to it.
@wayneantoniazzi2706 It is amazing. He reportedly boarded Carpathia around 8:30 in the morning, meaning he was wet for 6 hours. Others were wet, too, and lived, but some died in the lifeboats. He was part of the "small boats" that crossed the Channel to rescue the B.E.F. at Dunkirk. Quite a guy. I sent this idea in over a year ago, and our friend Mike Brady replied that he was interested. Now, just crickets. Oh well, LOL
@@msz5543 Mike might still be interested (Although obviously I can't speak for him!) but I'd guess the problem for him would be finding the source materials and photographs and putting it together in an interesting manner. Can't be easy. One thing I should have mentioned about Lightoller (but forgot to) was as soon as it was "Abandon ship! Every man for himself!" Lights could have done just that, looked out for himself and himself alone, but he didn't. Even drenched in freezing cold water and narrowly escaping with his life he still took command and brought order out of the chaos of the overturned collapsable boat. Quite a man.
Have you seen the shit modern ships have on board? Yes ship building then, and engineering in general was brilliant, but the advances in technology since then is astounding. They weren’t smarter, they just worked harder and used their brain and muscle power more because of the lack of computers, and they did more with less than we have now, but they didn’t know any different.
No lie there, when i was young and the internet was coming into form i thought wow, free information, everyone is going to be highly educated!! Boy was i wrong..
This time around, I'm thinking of Olympic's engines. When she was scrapped, it was stated that her engines were as fine as ever. I wonder if her scrappers had the sense to remove them and put them somewhere they could be used? Or if they were dismantled like the rest of the ship? Somebody knows, I'm sure, so it'd be nice to learn. Thanks, Mike! Big respect for your willingness to "correct" oversights!
Reciprocating engines were already outmoded on every metric by the end of _Olynpic's_ career (that was part of the reason she was scrapped rather than being given another overhaul). By that time, turbine drive systems had become more powerful *and* more fuel efficient, and all with fewer potential points of failure. Hull 400's engines would have been disassembled and melted down to be recycled.
Thank you for making this Complete Guide to Titanic’s Engines. I watched it on TV tonight but wanted to comment so I brought it up on my IPad so I can tell you that it’s wonderful! I wish my father was still with us to see this (He would have been 100 years old as of today.). He was a pattern maker for metal castings and would have appreciated the wooden patterns for the outside casing of the huge turbine engine. You are so very good at explaining these ships.
You'd think with how sophisticated these engines were, you'd think they would have engineered an auto coal feeding mechanism like how modern pellet stoves do, less space/resources required for crew (there would still need to be some for maintenance and managing the feed rate of the coal)
@@csmith6237 well in this case it could be driven off its own steam engine seeing as how its a steam train, or you could run an electric motor with a dynamo
Very interesting video! Have you done one about the human side of the engineers and boiler workers? Did any survive? What was their experience in the sinking?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crew_of_the_Titanic Summarized: 3 of 8 lead firemen survived. 45 of 163 stokers survived. 20 of 73 trimmers survived. 4 of 33 engine greasers survived. Other engineering crew, of which none survived: 25 engineering mechanics 2 boilermakers 8 electricians.
I've seen the original version and am excited to view this one. At least a dozen or more times. The fact that you took the time to remake it is a testament to your dedication to producing accurate content of high quality. Thank you for that.
Literally the best video about Titanic's drivetrain I've ever seen. Can't imagine how it could be any better. Thank you so much for blessing us with such great content.
Why label a reduction gear as a turbine? Particularly when Titanic's turbine was direct drive, there was no reduction gear. Also, those propeller shaft bearings shown were not "force fed" lubricated. Each bearing had a small sump and a loose ring hanging from the shaft was dragged by fluid friction through the sump and carried oil that lubricated the bearing.
Its not just tragic for the lifes lost. It is tragic for the Millions of Hours of Human work put into this machine to become the marvel it was. We are realy made in the image of God. Creators,capable of creating amazing things. Praise Jesus
![Lethal Company Music Video 🎵 "Follow The Orders" [VERSION A]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QeooZB4Z7RA/mqdefault.jpg)
This video is a remake of a video from about a month ago where we explored how Titanic’s engines worked. Some annoying issues and missed points have been eating me up though so I decided to see out the year by revisiting the subject and overhauling the video with new additions and information. Enjoy and happy new year!
Yay, bonus video! That’s some amazing dedication to accuracy right there. You’re great, mate.
Nice one, I fully understand how something can weigh on your mind if you're not happy with it. Glad you got the chance to revisit it. You've done awesome work this year, I hope next year is just as great!
Aaaaah Mr. Brady I had a feeling you'd end up doing this after the corrections video appeared. This is one of the things that really sets you apart is being driven enough to fully redo something rather than let it stand with corrections elsewhere. Great work!
And all the best to u and yours!
Great to see the effort taken to improve upon prior errors
The fact that you have remade this video shows your commitment and effort, and love for this topic. Thank you Mike! A treat as always!
the fact that he remade it and still didn't put in the fact that it was the Olympic that sank and not the Titanic, shows that his research was not very thorough, either that or he got paid something on the side to keep the lie going.
@@Turbo_Tastic OH MY GOD. You are one of those. I'm not even going to entertain your stupidity.
@Turbo_Tastic I'm sorry (not), but you sound so stupid with what you just said.
@@Turbo_Tastic Crazy how there is 0 evidence that Olympic and Titanic was switched. The whole thing is made up with zero evidence to back it up.
@@Turbo_Tastic You aren't serious...right?
This really is a tour de force. Whoever made this deserves tremendous success. The combination of old photos. amazing CGI and excellent dialogue and reading is almost unsurpassable. Thank you for this labor of love.
Agreed
Look up "Titanic: Honor and Glory" "Project 401" and prepare to be amazed. Those guys have done incredible work recreating Titanic.
I suppose I should have stated to look them up on RUclips. They have their own channel.
You’re a horrible person stop
Just the fact that it's a real human narrating and not an AI robot is awesome!
I can't believe I get to watch this for free. What a privilege, ty for ur hard work and brilliance
Books are for people with no life.
Welcome to RUclips
I agree, also subscribed🙂
😊
@@danerasmussen6468
And you couldn’t type thank you in full which wouldn’t take you anything.
This video is a masterclass on Titanic’s propulsion machinery, but so thoughtfully presented that it’s easy to understand the complex technology. So glad I found this channel, which is one of my favorite subscriptions! Excellent production and narration!
Especially the way they show the center propeller rotating the opposite direction from what it would be rotating, huh?
😢😢😢😢😢😢 1:05
As an industrial Millwright and a man obsessed with Titanic, this is one of the most interesting and best made videos I've ever watched. The attention to the details, the CGI with the engineering drawings, the obvious level of research and care to get this right, this was fantastic. I learned so much here that I never knew before, thank you!
If they was smart they would of sold the salt and not dumped it cause sea salt costs alot like himilayan salt but its white.
I'm an astronaut and I agree 👍
@@greenlawnfarm5827as smart as you?
I too (was) a Millwright / Rigger for Alltek . We worked with corrugators . I often think about the folks in the future . If all hell breaks loose again , we wipe ourselves nearly out where we have to start over . What would those folks think when they dredge this thing up ? We are amazed with Pyramids . Imagine finding this with no real context .
😢😢😢😢😢❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Well done to Mike for accepting his mistakes, addressing them, and then rereleasing this masterful video with the information that he had learned. Kudos to you, Mike!
he made the biggest mistake of all, the Titanic never sank, it was the sister ship Olympic that was sunk on purpose; maybe do some digging next time Mike and not just regurgitate propaganda?
@@Turbo_Tastic It’s been proven several times that it was in fact Titanic that sank and not Olympic. There are visual differences on the wreck, you can see the yard number 401 on the outboard propellers, and they couldn’t have switched the two around in the short amount of time Olympic returned to Belfast.
@@PainHurtss proven by who? anyone interested go watch this documentary and decide for yourself: The Best Titanic Conspiracy Documentary (2012)
@@PainHurtss for anyone intersted go watch The Best Titanic Conspiracy Documentary (2012). youtube won't even let me post this in a response, going to check to see if my comment gets deleted
@@PainHurtss proven; nothing can be proven, they can provide evidence that makes something likely or unlikely. The video seems to be well done, but he may as well be analyzing Santa's Sleight or the Star Ship Enterprises's engines, it is all fiction if he doesn't even know what ship it was.
The engineering of Titanic was truly extraordinary Mike . Absolutely loved this . Very well done .
@pureblood9477 I believe it now. Greed has always been the root of evil.
@pureblood9477 The Titanic was also insured, obviously 🙄
@pureblood9477 Aliens took the Olympic
@@tims_always_fishing7117 Your parents are lizards
@pureblood9477idiotic comment
I am not even finished yet but I just wanted to say that this video is an absolute masterpiece. The script and flow of the narrative is wonderful. The animations are immersive and so helpful in feeling like you are actually there on the ship taking this tour. Thank you for producing something with this level of quality, it is almost unimaginable to find this level of information anywhere, let alone on RUclips.
Really got to love the level of engineering in these old ships, don't think people realise that almost everything was moulded by hand 1st then cast afterwards. All done by thousands of skilled workers in tough conditions.
Exactly… And I’m pretty sure there were no women or transgenders on the payroll
Amazing
@@soshieopath7142 womp womp
@@soshieopath7142 does that matter?
@@wesleygreenhow8843 yes. d.e.i. = didn'+ earn i+.
It blows my mind to see such engineering marvels existing in 1912. I'm sure many of us would be in awe to see this process in person.
But this video is darn close to it. Awesome work!
even better technology existed over 12,000 years ago, but you will never hear about that, just like you also won't hear that it was the Olympic that sank and not the Titanic
I bould put in 308 and still keep warm. CHRISTINE SAID 8OO OR 1200 ...I THINK 1200
@@Turbo_TasticWhat difference does it make which of the two sank?
@@jan_777 it goes towards providing supposedly factual information on the Tittanic; if he doesn't even realize what ship sank how can the engine information be accurate? Plus it goes towards the fact that almost everything we are taught is a lie. If you are just enjoying your slavery in the matrix, yes then facts make no difference, enjoy not being alive.
@@Turbo_Tastic💯My man @3:27 was a 1912 29 year old...A rougher 29 than my man in MIB was! Shout out to him!
the fact they were able to do this in 1912 is still amazing
Right! The level of sophistication of shipbuilding of the time is downright astonishing.
Especially when you consider 50 years before Titanic the overwhelming majority of oceangoing vessels were still wood-built and sail powered.
Columbus could have captained a ship from 1860 but not one from 1910, he'd have been overwhelmed.
Why
@@EnjoySackLunch Think about it.
A ship from 1860: Wood, canvas, sails, wind-propelled. The configuration would have been different from a 15th Century caravel but the principles would be the same.
A ship from 1910: Steel, steam, electricity, size. Aside from the principles of navigation which wouldn't be too much different the ship handling and propulsion and internal systems would have been alien to Columbus.
Not that he couldn't learn of course, but I'm speaking of theoretically dropping him on the bridge cold.
Get it?
@@wayneantoniazzi2706 I wasn’t talking to you
@@wayneantoniazzi2706 They will be. Size do matter A LOT in ships, so these bigger ships might experience problems never experienced by smaller ones (like being a gigant magnet to ships moving near it). Speed also gone up a lot, so its a gigant brick, moving at incredible speed with no ability to easily change direction or speed, compared to even biggest ships of the previous era.
I am heavily involved with vintage steam machinery, engines etc at the Melbourne Steam Club here in Melbourne Australia, we have two triple expansion ship engines at the museum, both are operational with an output 0f 600hp each, small compared to Titanic but the operation of them gives you an idea of the sound that would have been normal in Titanic's engine room. There are hundreds of checks and ongoing checks to keep these engines operating reliably including lubrication, and using your ears which for the operators was a paramount skill as any change in sound meant an issue. This was a great video, and the CGI was very good giving us a feel for the interior of one of my favourite ships.
i love machinery! i've made it my life near five decades now. To be around the engines you have would be the biggest treat for me -
I am totally in all of the massive scale of these engines. What also, amazed me were the conditions that the firemen worked in. I have been in 47° heat and had to quickly go inside. These men worked in 49° heat for four hours. Can you imagine the massive strain😂 that this would’ve had on their bodies.
I like the Ransome Rapier walking dragline. Well done for saving this unique, for Victoria, machine.
Hi, I’m also in Melbourne ,
Where are these engines located,I would love to go and view them,
A reply would be most appreciated, please and thank you
@@artinconstruction9070 Melbourne Steam Traction Engine Club, Ferntree Gully Road Scoresby next to the Eastlink Tollway.
as a veteran of a Sacramento class fast combat support ship, i find the engineering of this ship fascinating. the fact they could do what they did, when they did is absolutely amazing.
This has to be, IMHO, one of the best Titanic videos ever made.
Would indeed be so if he used SI instead of the obsolete imperial measurements.
Being a marine engineer and having sailed on steam turbine passenger ships, I fully endorse this great video 😊!
MM2 on 3 ships, all in the Engineroom, this is a great training video.
The heat , the sweat , that was REALLY a few hour ' s GRAFT !
Being a regular ol' computer engineer having watched this video as well, I fully endorse this great comment 🙃!
We still a zm2be2😊Jesus gorgeous ifrenmsk
Engineers make this world livable.
No they dont.
So you don’t like climate controlled buildings, electricity, self moving chairs (aka cars) etc?
And mechanics make it work and keep on working 🦾
@@monkey6841 God made this world livable, all those things you listed are measly luxeries we dont need.
@@WorldsBestFisherman152And yet here you are blessing us with your nonsense via the use of electricity, radio communication etc. why don't you just go ahead and throw your phone and car in the sea you ingrate. I'm sure god would approve.
Having been in the Navy for twenty years, finally a video about the important part of the ship! The visual imaging was fantastic also!
What, the bunks you shared?
Yes, this is all about you.
@@stupidhead9117🤨
In WW2 the USN was said to run on black oil and coffee. If you can't go, well, you are where you are.
Titanic food
That 3d fly-though from the stack down to the engine room was amazing. I had to re-watch it on my 70 inch TV so I could appreciate these epic graphics!
I rewatched it on my 3d 100" Mega high Def 9 channel atomic tv.
@@rdallas81 Your mom watches TV
@@rdallas81dang you got a nuclear powered tv?? That is sick
Maudlin comments about the Titanic aside, it’s even cooler to think about how these same engines on board the Olympic were used in a combat scenario. The engines empowered Olympic to quickly overtake, ram, and sink a German sub (U-103) during WWI, accomplishing this feat not by firing weapons, but simply using the raw strength and engineering capabilities of the engines themselves. Olympic is still the only ocean liner in history to ever accomplish such a move.
I wish your videos highlighted the amazing history of Titanic’s unsung sister ship more!
Had a regiment of US infantry aboard, who later sent a bronze plaque to Olympic commemorating her feat. I think that plaque still exists today, though I don't know where. It read:
“This tablet presented by the 59th Regiment United States Infantry commemorates the sinking of the German submarine U-103 by the Olympic on May 12th, 1918 in latitude 49 degrees 16 minutes north longitude 4 degrees 51 minutes west on the voyage from New York to Southampton with American troops."
Also as much a testament to Captain Bertram Hayes and his skill as a mariner.
Every sailor in every military division of the whole British Empire was taught to attempt that procedure when facing a U-boat, but IKS SM-U103 was the only one that didn't manage to escape.
@@DistractedGlobeGuy Indeed!! In fact, in his autobiography, Sir Hayes says they actually sunk TWO submarines; according to him, the submarine they hit got basically sliced in two, with both halves going vertical before sinking. He says the U-103 is the one that was spotted behind them, which they opened fire on and damaged enough that it eventually sank, although a portion of that crew survived (including the U-boat commander). Honestly it makes a bit more sense to me! The events with a single u-boat never were very clear, in terms of HOW it was hit. Hayes acknowledges that most say he only sank one, but he also basically said he already got a pretty big honor out of it and wasn't going to press the issue, lol!
This channel just gets better and better. Wonderful video. Integrity at the heart of what Mike does.
integrity by promoting propaganda that the Titanic sank when anyone who has dug into knows it was the sister ship the Olympic that was sunk
8 months later and it's still true 🔥🔥
And this is a direct example of Mike’s ambition to create and share quality, entertaining content! Keep it up, Mike! 😊
Most would think that this "tired" subject of the RMS Titanic would draw no interest, but you have a way of presenting details that draws me in and makes me a superfan! Thank you.
This is incredible. Bravo to the makers of this historical masterpiece.
Incredible engineering, and all built on site! Remarkable. RIP to all the engineers, stokers and crew that went down bravely with their ship, what a terrible sadness.
@cs_247 Sorry to be that person. But they are called 'Firemen'. They are only called 'stokers' in the Navy.
Okay, I knew she used a feed water system, I knew she used a low pressure turbine, I knew she had condensers... I don't think I had as yet fully grasped the concept of how she was staged up to increase draft just by passing steam. THAT is some helpful info...
Yet another example of the difference between knowledge and comprehension. Your efforts are highly appreciated Mike.
I may not be able to pass over cash to you directly, but I'll make dang sure to watch it thrice and let ads play... it's all I can do, hope it helps.
An incredibly complex machine system broken down and logically presented in terms the layman can understand - not n easy task, yet Mike has done it so well ! Ongoing thanks for your most impressive efforts, Mike !
If you see all the thousands of tons of coal it needed its equal to just an icecube sized block of uranium 235 for the entire trip. Shows you how far we've come...
@@ttm2609agreed, fuck coal
@@ttm2609You mean coal yeah? It is really bad, producing smoke and tons of CO2
@@ttm2609Pretty obvious which is worse
@@ttm2609not really,no emissions..only getting rid of it afterwards
@@ttm2609the coal? Yes, very
Excellent summary. Thank you. The first ship I sailed in with the Canadian Navy was a WW2 frigate then used as a training ship. It had 2 triple expansion engines and two pressurized boiler rooms and all auxillaries were steam driven as well. It was fascinating to be down below to see it all running. As part of our training, We spent a lot of time in the machinery spaces to learn how it all ran. Even now I'm involved with a wooden hulled steam tug in Vancouver with a triple expansion engine.
As an ex condenser repair contractor thanks for this stunningly researched and produced piece .
Another great video, Mike. It would be interesting, in a future video, to explore the differences in efficiency and machinery on Olympic , between her original coal fired set up, and after her 1920 refit and conversion to oil.
Very big of you to mention the commenter who corrected you regarding the water used to generate steam. Great vid!
You are a Class Act!
I hope you feel better, ship guy! Thanks for making this video in spite of not feeling well.
It's the first time I've seen any of this channels videos and I must applaud the incredible journey it takes with immaculate CG animation, clear historic footage and well polished narration, such a pleasure to watch, amazing work there!
That was a fantastic documentary on Titanic's engines, im that much more educated, on expansion and turbine engines now.
As an engineer I loved this video. Excellent explanation and very high quality renders!
Mike, this complex technology blew my mind that it occurred in the late 19th and early 20th century. As always, thank you very much for your knowledge and determination!!!
No nonsense or fake film artifacts, just responsible research and clear presentation. Great stuff!
This was beyond fantastic! We all appreciate this!
Always been fascinated by the Titanic.. Was on many passenger ships as a kid.. their colossal size and majesty was always a thrill to me. Plus I like mechanics.. and how things work.. Thanks for the tour!
I appreciate the obvious HARD WORK and research in making this video. It's incredible how these engines were built. I did not realize how the castings were made. Amazing craftsmanship over 112 years ago. Sharing with everyone I know. Watching from the Philippines
I adore this channel ! I binge watched every video when i found our friend Mike. I love anything to do with history and learning how people lived and worked in the past. Mike is so good at what he does and when he speaks ,its as if you are having a personal conversation with him. ❤😊
Thanks so much :)
Another excellent video. I finally understand how the turbines would have worked with the steam below atmospheric pressure! Thank you.
Class act acknowledging and openly admitting your misunderstanding. Great job editing the video to incorporate those corrections.
If you look close the center propeller is turning the wrong way. It may be the actual way it turned, but the blades are wrong @ 32:32 Left hand prop turning right. Still a great Video as always Mike. Just something I noticed after watching the video a few times. Great Info on the Titanic. I never get enough
You are right
It's just the camera mirroring the footage
@@delta-7operativeAK I disagree. the propeller is turning the wrong way.
Wow Mike....your videos never cease to amaze me...great research....
179 men moving 600 tons is about 3.3 Tons EACH! per day. Not a job I would sign up for.
Presentation with narration makes for a very interesting video.
I loved the in depth description how these monster engines worked.
Casting such enormous engine parts in 1912 is truly mind boggling.
I really enjoyed this and gained a lot of information on this magnificent ship. Thanks again..👌
Shifting that weight is not as dramatic as it sounds, but would have been in such awful conditions.
At 14 years old I regularly loaded/moved 8 tons of straw bales in a day, and at 62 I can still easily load 1/2 ton of coal from my van to the bunker in 25 minutes. I am quite large but remain far from exceptional amongst the people I have known!
The casting is pretty impressive, but at the end of the day you're still just heating up a bunch of metal and making it into one big lump. I'm really impressed by the machining of it, cutting such massive parts to the precision needed for efficient and reliable operation. Even today that would be difficult, and we have the advantage of advanced materials for cutting tools, digital readouts for machine tool positioning, electric or hydraulic servo drives, and eventually CNC control. As a machinist, I find it fascinating that something so large and powerful could be machined, at a time when high-speed steel was still mostly a laboratory project rather than a commercial product.
@@thedubwhisperer2157We don't use bale thrower wagons, just stack it behind the baler on flat wagon. About 150 bales a load, assume each is 40 lbs gives 6000 lbs or 3 tons a load. Takes about 45 minutes minutes per load so you're moving 4 tons an hour. Keep that up for several hours a day.
So Tennessee Ernie Ford's "you load 16 tons, another day older" is entirely realistic. Except shoveling deep in a coal mine is a far worse job than farming.
Yeh 3 tons of coal isn't much at all really although the conditions would've made it much harder
Conditions had much improved for the boiler men by 1912
Personally when I was a labourer I would easily mix 15-20 tons of sharp or ballast into screed or concrete in a day
It was a busy day and had to work quickly so we didn't over run but I wouldn't say it was particularly daunting
@@thedubwhisperer2157 nice story
This was a great video. I enjoyed it very much. My grandpa served in the merchant marines during World War II as an engineer. I know he would have loved and definitely would have approved this video.
Mike, your presentations are always educational, captures ones’ interest and superbly done.
Most truly excellent job on this program!!
HUGE scale of machinery!!
I've enjoyed watching your videos for a couple years now, and thoroughly enjoyed them and what I learned. But these recent ones focused on Titanic are several levels above your usual great quality and content. Thank you for these, and for keeping alive the memories and knowledge of that time, and doing it in such an entertaining, educational, and respectful way.
Mike, thanks for this vid. Thanks for focusing on the unseen crew that spent almost all their time below decks providing the skill and work it took to make ships like Titanic function. For me they were also hero's, the crew that stayed at their posts during the sinking, keeping the steam pressure up so the lights could be kept on and also keep the pumps going to help slow down the sinking. Thanks again and Happy New Year.
mike
I am glad you do videos into the technical side of ships. It’s good for umm the future 😉
Incredible engineering. Thanks for a beautiful video Mike...fascinating stuff...
Yes, as you say, a "summary", but a consummate summary, rich in conceptual enhancement for the viewer. Excellent, Sir.
You do a great job on your videos with comprehensive narration, historical photos, plans, related images and videos. Helps one visualize how grand that ship was and all the systems required to make it function. It was quite a complex machine.
i dont say this lightly I truly enjoyed the video
Well done, Mike, once again. Anything Titanic seems to be endlessly fascinating and you present these documentaries really well.
You could make a 36 minute long video about Titanic’s toilets and I’d watch it.
Honestly, same. The whole ship is such a technological wonder that every part (toilets included) is fun to learn about, especially from Mike Brady!
Creepy
Nor me either. Tozzpot seems intent to prove me wrong no matter what I say. So, I'm dropping this entire conversation.
My original post was about how easy it would've been to avoid the collision. But the entire post seems to have morphed in toilets from my point that the ship struck the berg on the side it was easiest to avoid it.
Matt deWinkleer has one on his channel if you're that keen on it, although his is only about ten minutes.
Honestly, such an impressive design! Absolutely genius! And you did a great job combining it in a documentary! If i watched this instead of the actual movie, it would have been money way better spent. Bravo!
Possibly the most staggering design and engineering concepts video going! It's a miracle for that age and, indeed, even the present day.
Mike, a wonderful , wonderful video, superbly presented! You are truly a gift to our part of humankind which loves and reveres ocean liners and these magnificent ships in particular. Thank you! Edward Wollenberg, Clarksville, Arkansas, USA.
Very nice Mike. Quite detailed and updated. I'm blown away by the technical advances of the 20th Century. How were they able to get effectively NEGATIVE pressure leftover from the reciprocating engines to run the turbine at an atmospheric pressure lower than ambient?! Wow, she really was a technological advancement and at such awesome fuel savings. The 20th century really was an technological leap forward in so many ways.
If the condenser temperature is low enough and the steam system is closed to the environment, you can expand steam below ambient pressure.
@@NaNlinear Mike actually addressed this in the other video. It's 9 PSI Absolute, as referenced by Harland & Wolfe records and writings.
That was an old principle in 1912. It was developed by James Watt around 1800.
Running in the North Atlantic would've helped in this regard, as pulling such frigid water through the condensers would have increased vacuum on the steam side.
It's a bit funny that taking in colder water and deliberately dumping heat (the main product of a coal fire) into the ocean actually improved system efficiency, but the engines work on a pressure difference, rather than temperature.
To illustrate this, consider that at sea-level atmospheric pressure, water changes to steam, and vice-versa, at 212°F. At higher altitudes, like in the Swiss Alps, water can boil at only 195°F.
Titanic's boilers were producing 215 PSI steam at around 400°F. By the time it left the reciprocating triple-expansion engines, the steam was down to 188°F - but because the pressure was so low, it was still steam! After leaving the turbine, it was colder than a cup of tea at around 100°F... but STILL a gas! It wasn't until the condensers dropped the steam to 60°F that it finally returned to water.
It was good engineering but not a new concept at the time. The Industrial Revolution started about a century and a half prior, but these concepts go back to the late 1600s and early 1700s: A lot of work is credited to Denis Papin, who, also known for essentially inventing the autoclave, pressure cooker, described a piston steam engine working on these principles in 1690.
At last! A video on the extraordinary engineering of the Olympic class ships! Personally, I find this stuff fascinating and when you look at this machinery, it's also rather elegant too.
Thanks for sharing this. I know it's only scratching the surface of a Titanic subject, it would take an effort of Olympic proportions to cover the entire systems. However, please accept the thanks of this Britannic citizen!
Happy and healthy New Year too!
I'm just lost for words, the sheer scale of engineering! Thank you so much for sharing this amazing ships triumph and tragedy.
Working As an engineer I loved this video.I have a new respect for the incredible engineering task it was.Size does matter in this case . Excellent explanation and very high quality renders!
One could now understand why so many water tight doors were needed. The engineering involved for efficiency is really impressive.
Great video! Wonderful graphics!! An amazing story of an amazing peak of technology!! Thanks for presenting!
Fascinating description of the engineering of the Titanic. I have always wondered how fascinating it would be if the Titanic were to be rebuilt as it was. I know it would be an extremely expensive endeavour but fascinating to see. Cheers Mike on another awesome video.👍 absolutely incredible
Fascinating
1/10th scale - only 60 tons a day & free water-skiing! (I know, a slight scaling malfunction : )
Well done, Mike! What surprises me is how much advanced technology was used in Titanic's engines. Considering the time in which it was built, it's truly extraordinary. For perspective, it was less than a decade earlier that the Wright's flew for the first time in 1903. Wow!!
Honestly, the engineering genius of Titanic's designers can't be overstated. The genius of how the largest passenger ships afloat at the time could move at near-Cunard speed while burning 40% less coal boggles the mind, that nearly every joule of energy was sucked out of the steam in order to power the ship through the ocean. My interest in Titanic started with how opulent it was and of the hubris of man, but lately I've found the engineering and design of Titanic to be equally as fascinating. The ship stands as a marvel of Victorian/Edwardian engineering, that just about any way man could divine and design a moving system was implemented in some way, shape, or form in one single ship. While there were definitely engineering oversights made, like how the watertight bulkheads ought to have been built higher or there not being ample lifeboat room to evacuate the entire ship, it doesn't take away with the genius it took to create the largest moving object made by the hand of man at the time.
Not just the genius of the designers but also the skill of the craftsmen. Imagine fabricating the patterns for the molds, the skill of the foundry men in pouring the molten steel into them at the right temperature and speed to ensure it flows into very part of mold without leaving any weakening voids. The experince of the machinists in machining the faces of the castings to fine tolerances and then the other tradesman in marking, and drilling hundreds of hole so everything would assemble together. In any one of those steps one mistake would have cost thousands of pounds and put back delivery of the parts, possibly. by weeks
And it SUNK.
@@rdallas81 sank
Your vids are awesome. Thank you for keeping Titanic alive!
Even though it’s a remake (executed even better than than the original) it makes perfect watching for the commute home after the holidays.
Hope you and your team have a lovely new year! Thank you for everything this year, here’s to another year of phenomenal content ✨🎉
Mike, we all owe you a debt of gratitude for the remarkable work, dedication, and information that you provide to us.
Just mind blowing to think that all this weight, effort and engineering sunk to the bottom of the sea never to be used again.
As if the Titantic needed to be any more heartbreaking... the amount of work put into building it... they worked so hard 😢
Wonderful video. Titanic engines was fascinating me since I saw them running in 1997 movie as a kid. Thank you for ton of amazing details. Funny thing, I think that center propeller is rotating in reverse in all animations :D Or its maybe just my impression. Everything best in the new year for all of you guys!
You're not wrong, the central prop is turning the wrong way.
Thank you - I was going to ask this same question, but thought I should search first, and I found your comment! This is truly awesome video!
We need a video about the ship's electrical plant. There really isn't much on youtube about them
🤷♂️ There is a full length video on it.
I agree!
I can't even imagine this being thought up and created and then run. Astonishing!
Such comprehensive, exhaustive research obviously went into this video, to say nothing of its marvellously accurate visual component. Really well done! Thank you.
Well done!!! Having the honesty to admit and correct errors is a sign of integrity. And while the trolls will mock you, the rest of us will salute you for it.
192 men shovelled 600 tons of coal a day.. that’s just over 3 tons of coal per man, per day, in conditions equal to hell itself.. those were true men, ESPECIALLY on the night/morning of the 13/14th of August 1912.. each one of em stayed at their boilers almost right up to the end.. some of them DID stay right until she split in half, and made the ultimate sacrifice so the people up top had a chance to survive the night
Mike: Would you consider doing a video on survivability in general, along with specific regards to Charles Lightoller? By all accounts anyone who had to be fished out of the drink, or clung to a boat that night should have been gone long before Carpathia arrived. Twenty eight degree water, an air temperature in the low 30's, yet after being sucked under water and nearly drowned, he makes it to an overturned collapsible, takes command, hours later hooks up with another boat, transfers all to that, and is the last person to board Carpathia. How could he do this? Even Bride lived with, I believe, severe cold injuries to his foot. Obviously getting out of the water was the only hope, but still, these people were soaked. How did they not all succumb to hypothermia? I think a look at Lights and others who defied the odds would be pretty interesting. Regards.
How did Lightoller manage all that? I'll tell you, adrenaline and command responsibility. Both can keep you going longer than you might think. Trust me, I know from personal experience. (But not like Lightollers!)
Lightoller stayed alive, functioning, and providing leadership because somebody had to and that somebody was HIM.
Sometimes that's all there is to it.
@wayneantoniazzi2706 It is amazing. He reportedly boarded Carpathia around 8:30 in the morning, meaning he was wet for 6 hours. Others were wet, too, and lived, but some died in the lifeboats. He was part of the "small boats" that crossed the Channel to rescue the B.E.F. at Dunkirk. Quite a guy. I sent this idea in over a year ago, and our friend Mike Brady replied that he was interested. Now, just crickets. Oh well, LOL
@@msz5543 Mike might still be interested (Although obviously I can't speak for him!) but I'd guess the problem for him would be finding the source materials and photographs and putting it together in an interesting manner. Can't be easy.
One thing I should have mentioned about Lightoller (but forgot to) was as soon as it was "Abandon ship! Every man for himself!" Lights could have done just that, looked out for himself and himself alone, but he didn't. Even drenched in freezing cold water and narrowly escaping with his life he still took command and brought order out of the chaos of the overturned collapsable boat. Quite a man.
@wayneantoniazzi2706 Mike puts out fantastic material. I watch and rewatch it all the time.
You'd sink in the water from escaping air as ship sinking,not sucked under.
The design and the manufacture of the turbine is beyond amazing!
A wonderful tour though the Titanic’s engines. Thank you for sharing.
Interesting Fact:
For James Cameron's Titanic, the engines scenes were filmed on the Liberty ship Jeremiah O'Brien
That’s not even remotely interesting
Oh, it absolutely is interesting!
@@EnjoySackLunch Then why did you bother commenting?
@@MarinCipollina to share my opinion, which is contrary. I am sorry this has rattled you.
@@EnjoySackLunch Not at all rattled.. Just pointing out your irrationality.. I do this for fun 🙂
All this with pen and paper god damnn I swear people were smarter back then
They used their brain??
So true
Have you seen the shit modern ships have on board? Yes ship building then, and engineering in general was brilliant, but the advances in technology since then is astounding. They weren’t smarter, they just worked harder and used their brain and muscle power more because of the lack of computers, and they did more with less than we have now, but they didn’t know any different.
No lie there, when i was young and the internet was coming into form i thought wow, free information, everyone is going to be highly educated!! Boy was i wrong..
This time around, I'm thinking of Olympic's engines.
When she was scrapped, it was stated that her engines were as fine as ever. I wonder if her scrappers had the sense to remove them and put them somewhere they could be used? Or if they were dismantled like the rest of the ship?
Somebody knows, I'm sure, so it'd be nice to learn.
Thanks, Mike! Big respect for your willingness to "correct" oversights!
Reciprocating engines were already outmoded on every metric by the end of _Olynpic's_ career (that was part of the reason she was scrapped rather than being given another overhaul). By that time, turbine drive systems had become more powerful *and* more fuel efficient, and all with fewer potential points of failure.
Hull 400's engines would have been disassembled and melted down to be recycled.
Thank you for making this Complete Guide to Titanic’s Engines. I watched it on TV tonight but wanted to comment so I brought it up on my IPad so I can tell you that it’s wonderful! I wish my father was still with us to see this (He would have been 100 years old as of today.). He was a pattern maker for metal castings and would have appreciated the wooden patterns for the outside casing of the huge turbine engine. You are so very good at explaining these ships.
A masterpiece - not just the engineering of the ship, but certainly also the video, the CGI, and the narration. Bravo!
You'd think with how sophisticated these engines were, you'd think they would have engineered an auto coal feeding mechanism like how modern pellet stoves do, less space/resources required for crew (there would still need to be some for maintenance and managing the feed rate of the coal)
Modern pellet stoves require electricity. Where would you get the initial energy to power an auto feed?
@@csmith6237 well in this case it could be driven off its own steam engine seeing as how its a steam train, or you could run an electric motor with a dynamo
@Sausketo that would still require feeding a steam engine though, you're just adding extra weight and parts to a proven system
@@csmith6237 only the steam generator/boiler requires fuel, so a small accessory steam engine would only require plumming
@Sausketo so we would start with an initial main engine start up and let the feed take over? That could've worked I suppose.
Engines were absolutely Titanic. Cheers!
Very interesting video! Have you done one about the human side of the engineers and boiler workers? Did any survive? What was their experience in the sinking?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crew_of_the_Titanic
Summarized:
3 of 8 lead firemen survived.
45 of 163 stokers survived.
20 of 73 trimmers survived.
4 of 33 engine greasers survived.
Other engineering crew, of which none survived:
25 engineering mechanics
2 boilermakers
8 electricians.
I've seen the original version and am excited to view this one. At least a dozen or more times. The fact that you took the time to remake it is a testament to your dedication to producing accurate content of high quality. Thank you for that.
Literally the best video about Titanic's drivetrain I've ever seen. Can't imagine how it could be any better. Thank you so much for blessing us with such great content.
Why label a reduction gear as a turbine? Particularly when Titanic's turbine was direct drive, there was no reduction gear. Also, those propeller shaft bearings shown were not "force fed" lubricated. Each bearing had a small sump and a loose ring hanging from the shaft was dragged by fluid friction through the sump and carried oil that lubricated the bearing.
Its not just tragic for the lifes lost. It is tragic for the Millions of Hours of Human work put into this machine to become the marvel it was. We are realy made in the image of God. Creators,capable of creating amazing things. Praise Jesus
We can arrange atoms in a way which suits us. I'd say WE are god
And all this with NO COMPUTERS !! 😊
Even this video
No need to worry about Crowdstrike back then.....
@@pioshelby7611 that’s for true !!😂😂
This is a fantastic video. It's a pity dad is no longer here he would have loved. In the 60s, he sailed as an engineer between Baltimore and Panama.
Brilliant cgi it was as if we were walking round the engine rooms and boilers well done very informative
My mother worked in a coal mine for 15 years.
Fake
@@cryptiic1859 it’s true for 15 years she worked in coal mine. Until the mine was shut down.
@Wadethewallaby2001 "I think I've got the black lung pop." - Zoolander
@@mattstone8878 okay?
@@Wadethewallaby2001 Have you seen Zoolander? It's a great comedy.