WATCH: Judge snaps at Karen Read after testy exchange with lawyer
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
- The judge in the trial of a Massachusetts woman accused of hitting her Boston police officer boyfriend with her SUV and leaving him to die in a snowstorm snaps at Karen Read after a testy exchange with her lawyer. Read more: bit.ly/45JsRPC
#karenread #news
Subscribe: smarturl.it/AssociatedPress
Read more: apnews.com
This video may be available for archive licensing via newsroom.ap.org/home
That defendant's name is quite appropriate. Smug, entitled.
Karen seems to be enjoying herself thoroughly
why not avoid any appellate issue and add a not guilty box...
Because the judge like most lawyers has a massive ego and refuses to back down.
law is based on precedent- no need to make an exception for one lawyer/ one case.
@@pconrz exactly how many judges have you meet and talked with at length to draw this conclusion?
@@MrSeminole77 It’s obvious you’ve never met one. 😂😂🤣🤣🖕🏾🫵🏽
They’re trying to save taxpayer money for ink
What was the smirky defendant accused of??
I agree with the lawyer
How hard is it just to add a box that says “not guilty”?! This judge is ridiculous and makes me question other cases presided that court.
She did
@@GeneralLeia but not initially despite the defense requesting it prior to passing them out to the jurors. The defense had to challenge her on it before she came back to revise it. So ridiculous and obvious she was trying to subconsciously persuade the jury to vote guilty! 🙄
If no one has figured out yet … jury’s don’t always understand these confusing instructions !
*Juries*
@@KimberWhite1 You seem really fun
If the jury doesn't understand something, they can ask the judge for clarity...
It will be funny if they use that for an appeal 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I have never had an attorney that would fight like this man !
JACKSON..... G.O.A.T
I guess that's what £$€ the perks of a 7 figure defense team.
Karen has been smug, and snarky.
I thought the same thing
She knows she’s innocent. IT’s confidence not arrogance.
Oh look, just like all politicians, elected officials, police, etc we have people in power who are tired and don't want to have to deal with something.
I don't get it. There's a missing checkbox that the defense lawyer is complaining about(right?) or there just isn't a checkbox because it's not needed, which is what the judge is saying(right?).
If the checkbox is a "Guilty" mark then I can see where that makes sense. Just don't put a mark in that box if you don't think the defendant is guilty. Everybody is innocent until proven guilty, the defendant is innocent until the jury marks that guilty checkbox.
Wellll, juries want very much to follow the instructions. Juries often are confused by what they have to do with the concluding paperwork. In CA we DO have two boxes; not having a "not guilty" box is ludicrous.
That makes no sense that the jury doesn't have a "not guilty" option! The judge is in fact forcing the jury to make the verdict she wants and "not guilty" isn't even an option to her. That is not fair nor judicially correct! KR's defense team can appeal any negative ruling, petition for her recusal and file a complaint/report her to the judicial review board!
Makes one realise the judge in Murdaughs case was a pure gentleman!!! No ignorant ego there😮
Sounds pretty simple to me this lawyer is looking for any reason to overturn or influence the decision.
Seems like the judge doesn't like her.
I agree with her Attorney, its a reasonable request.
She's one of the worst judges on you tube or sitting
I guess as far as defense attorneys go, he’s the kind you want that’s gonna fight for you.
YA , HIM AND YOUNG THUGS LAWYER'S 😎.
Absolutely. That's what makes our system work well, most of the time.
@@anodyne57 “IT” doesn’t work. That’s what we have been screaming all this time. This is a direct result.
This defense lawyer has superior reasoning and critical thinking skills than the judge.
Are they making up their own laws in America.
He is really fighting for his client !
You know the FED's talked to BEV about it cause, she changed it in the end.....
This judge needs to go. She's a horrible judge to the defense
This judge is something else
Judge has made a ruling, let it go.
Hopefully, the prosecution can clean up its case and present a better case for trial next time...
Purpose of defense attorneys are to help ensure the law is applied correctly. Seems to be pointing out some very important discrepancies. Judge seems very unprofessional.
I agree with the defense attorney.
Shes a horrendous biased judge
Karen probably smirked in anger at Proctor's lawyer's sister (judge Bev)
Because she took Karen Read to task for smirking and shaking her head? Thats disrespectful. No judge would put up with that.
@peace-yv4qd just her overall behaviour. Nothing you say will change my mind. Soz
NASTY REED
The attorney is Alan Jackson, since when is the country singer a attorney.
Everbody needs a second career..
AUNTIE BEV HAD TO CRAB WALK BACK INTO THE COURTROOM AND CHANGE THE VERDICT FORM AND WRITE ANOTHER JURY INSTRUCTION… BEV GOT SPANKED
I think she's a snarky judge. I'm not fond at all of this Judge!
This is like those confusing ballot initiatives. If you vote yes you're really saying no and visa versa.
Oh heaven for bid that we actually allow someone to be not guilty in America 🙄🇺🇸
Auntie beverage has got to be the worst judge ever.
Thinking the judge is in on this whole conspiracy you know what I’m saying you know what I mean! I’m tired. We’re all tired. Judge Jesus Christ.
Women think different! Ask Adam!
It’s incredibly incredibly difficult once you have to appeal .. rather than having DOUBT … ridiculous! Great Justice system
This judge is awful!!!!
it goes without saying that she's not guilty. she's assumed not guilty until proven otherwise. this is a ridiculous complaint.
Massachusetts is ground zero for chaos and dysfunction can fully understand why people are packing up and leaving it all behind. Embarrassing speak up or we will have to shut the air conditioner off.
Shady judge. Shady court.
Aunty Bev is a biased judge and she needs to be admonished and censured by the judicial committee 😮
"Presumption of innocence" should've been her response to why there's no box for Not Guilty.
This judge should be disbarred.
😂that's a laughable comment! This is the commonwealth of Massachusetts, not the state of California. Poor Jackson can cry me a river 😢 😭 😔😂😂😂😂😂
just hope she's not part of the blue wall I've never seen a judge speak the way she does and says she tired it's no ones fault that she is tired if she should take a different case
Nah, judge is sick of crazed lunatics showing far too much interest
Judge seems to be very much part of the blue wall..corruption
She changed it calm down everyone.
Disgraceful behaviour of the Judge. Karen was obviously and rightly incredulous!
This judge is a joke
I like this Judge that Karen has..the Judge was made a fool of...just saying...I would have laughed as well, the judge's reaction was defensive... Judge was tired, to begin with, and then everything went pear-shaped.... my opinion but what the lawyer was asking, he did not get a proper reply... sad!
This judge is corrupt as hades!
Bev sounds exactly like she wants a guilty! How do you leave off Not Guilty Boxes on any verdict form? Never mind all the word salad thats has been slung around from prosecution! Sounds like Bev wants to have a Whiteclaw with the McAlberts/McCabes.
If you watch the full video, the judge actually laughed just a couple minutes later; an audible laugh…duplicity is a nasty thing.
If you are not guilty of a superior charge how could you be guilty of the lesser included charges that stem from that superior charge? MA is a joke
Of course she is laughing, she has fooled so many and added so much nonsense to the case to try to get off!! Absolutely disgusting behavior.....
This judge is very Unfair and very partial to the prosecution.
His defense is non sense. There's instructions in the paper, does he think the jury is too dumb to understand it?
Well there are some yes, just bcuz their jurors don't mean their smart.
Unfortunately there’s a lot of people in our society lacking common sense.
i think it also has to do with the fact that staring at a box with only guilty introduces bias. it should have both to remain fair
The verdict on the slip is Not Guilty UNLESS guilty is checked against any of the charges, it’s not difficult
You'd need to be a lawyer to understand that form. Is was not clear and it needs to be. It was a dodgy form, there needs to be a not guilty box.
I believe he representsed Weinstein . I wouldnt wanted to associate with this guy. RUMOR her and the that lawyer are very friendly 😉
she was just being a “Karen” …
Judge got caught so she took it out on Karen. Period. That's exactly what happened.🙄
It’s like he’s trying to sabotage his client
Guilty
I like the judge- she is Bostonian 100%
Bev is one spitef biased disgraceful judge! Its absolutely disgusting 🤮 🤮🤮🤮
I don't think she is guilty but she doesn't seem to be a very nice person but it doesn't make her guilty.
You're right, she doesn't need to be likable to be innocent of the charge she's facing. But how would you behave facing this lot that are trying to pin this crime on you?
Choo choo.. All aboard the railroad.
So now this defense attorney is trying to give the public the impression that special verdict slips were created for this case, and this case only.
From day one, he has been trying to convince the jurors and the public, that there is some vast conspiracy, involving the entire judicial system, to frame Roger Rabbit.
I've seen lawyers like this defense attorney in various other trials. They always seem to think that they are the smartest person in the room and they always, always go too far. They seem to be performing for the cameras or their friends and law partners. They don't seem to care if their methods are effective or if their antics insult the judge or the intelligence of the jurors.
Well said
Welp.... and he is the kind of attorney u want to be represented by.
Clearly you have not even watched this trial! And if you think a verdict slip that does not have the option of "not guilty" on it is acceptable, then there is no point seeking reasonable debate with you!
@@lizlapara9656 Only if you're obviously guilty.
All he has to do is create reasonable doubt. He doesn't have to prove innocence. From what I've seen, if I were a juror I would be voting not guilty, I didn't see enough hard evidence that she did it, and can see how the evidence presented could have been manipulated, which gives me doubt about the accuracy and motivation of the investigation, in turn creating doubt about her guilt. He did his job.
Bev is a joke of a judge! Bias as ….
It's the Karen voice for me
I think this judge should’ve been thrown right off this bench. She was a nasty witch.!
User Interface problem could send her to prison
Retrial ... And stop whingeing your tired and then project towards other professionals.
The attorney is bringing this up so it can be included in future appeal. The judge is not going to change it and he knew her answer was going to be no before even asking. As for judge making comment to Karen it was inappropriate and shows judge is biased.
This judge is just awful
Gal in the red is cute. Porky in the black can leave and it won’t effect anything
WOKE JUDGE.
💙IAbolishTheElectoralCollege!!BanAssaultWeapons!!!!!!!!!!!DefundPoliceNationwideLikeWeDidPortland!!!!!!PackTheSupremeCourt!!!!!!!!OpenDaBorder!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VoteDEMOCRATtoSaveDemocracy!!!!!💙🇵🇸💙🇵🇸💙
Move to France.
@Jeff: Why don't you move away and make everyone here happy.
How's it working for you?
@@jeffl.8489 Zesty Macron and hubby LOST. Conservatives are in charge now! Wehoooo!
@@jeffl.8489Move to Russia!
Time wasting nonsensical BS from Jackson like his entire case.
His argument was totally valid and relevant. One not familiar w judicial proceedings may not get that, but it is
Obviously that judge is biased.
1+1=Khaboiabeji?2&39.6?3@
This judge is something else