Better than E-Ink? Eyefriendly, Outdoor-Monitor Eazeye Radiant | REVIEW

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
  • Today, I have something interesting to share: the Eazeye Radiant, a portable transreflective LCD monitor designed for use in direct sunlight and low-light conditions, thanks to its layered screen technology.
    🔗 LINKS
    ► Eazeye Radiant crowdfunding campaign page: igg.me/at/eaze...
    ⭐ SUBSCRIBE
    / @chalidraqami
    🖖WHO AM I
    I'm Chalid, and I've been a fan of e-ink technology for a very long time. I've been reviewing e-ink devices since 2010. After more than 100 different e-reader tests for my German website, this channel is dedicated to sharing my experiences with the latest e-readers, other e-paper devices, and sometimes other tech in English as well.
    🔗 DISCLAIMER/DISCLOSURE
    The tips, tricks and experiences shared are for guidance only; any actions taken based on these are solely at your own risk. Some links in the description contain affiliate links, which means that if you buy something through these links, I will receive a small commission on a purchase at no additional cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Thank you so much for supporting the channel.
    🔖 TAGS
    eazeye, eazy eye, eyecare monitor, eazeye radiant, outdoor monitor, outdoor living, outdoor display, transreflective LCD, transreflective monitor, transreflective display, eyecare monitor, eyecare display
    #lcd #epaper #outdoorlife #outdoorliving

Комментарии • 36

  • @MsLukhach
    @MsLukhach 3 месяца назад

    Hello, can you tell me, this monitor vs Eyemoo S1? Which is better? This backlight is better front light on S1 for eye? Thanks

  • @ambinintsoahasina
    @ambinintsoahasina 2 месяца назад +2

    Man, this channel is highly underrated

  • @KitBetts-Masters
    @KitBetts-Masters 5 месяцев назад +3

    Great comparison with the spectrometer. (I thought for a moment it was a Star Trek Communicator on your desk!)

  • @yuvilio
    @yuvilio 5 месяцев назад +2

    Great review and footage. I believe the Eazeye folks said they're going to use an anti-reflective glass layer (not sure if that made the model they sent you) and may include something to put on it for further light disperson. Either way, curious what adding a matte screen protector to some or part of the screen to compare the glare reduction/display quality. I remember a marked improvement on my Hisense Q5 rlcd, with minimal blur.

  • @mattecrystal6403
    @mattecrystal6403 3 месяца назад

    You should try to check out the NXTPAPER 14 when it releases. It's kind of similar to this but had a matte screen and try to emulate feel of eink without actually being eink.

  • @Xingqiwu387
    @Xingqiwu387 Месяц назад

    Excellent review again from Chalid. Thank you! I honestly can't wait to get their revised version of this monitor.

  • @ThierryC-te3rx
    @ThierryC-te3rx 5 месяцев назад +2

    Hannspree is so sleeply with its R-LCD devices...

  • @Moravakman
    @Moravakman 11 дней назад

    Just found your channel. Thanks for the posts! I have one question, what is that Startrek display in the background?? is it an animation on a monitor or something more complex?? I like it 😀

    • @ChalidRaqami
      @ChalidRaqami  11 дней назад

      Thanks! :) It's a TV with this website in full screen: mewho.com (titan; not made by me). There are a couple of different LCARS options available - all of them are incredible!

  • @dameanvil
    @dameanvil 4 месяца назад +1

    00:00 🌞 Introducing the Easi Radiant: a portable transreflective LCD monitor for sunlight and low light conditions.
    00:19 📜 Transreflective Explained: Combines reflective display for sunlight with backlight for dark settings.
    00:45 🐢 E-Ink Limitations: Slow refresh rates, color saturation, and ghosting issues.
    01:10 🎁 Disclosure: Easi provided the review unit with no input on content.
    01:22 🖥 Build Quality: Aluminum body, sturdy, weighs over a kilo, 15.6-inch Full HD screen.
    01:49 🔗 Connectivity: Mini HDMI, USB-C, stereo speakers, headphone jack, control switch.
    02:20 🌈 Backlight Tint: Greenish tint due to full-spectrum LED backlight mimicking natural light.
    02:48 🔍 Blue Light Reduction: Spectrometer test shows less blue light emission compared to typical displays.
    03:41 🧠 Comfortable Backlight: Potentially more eye-friendly, though color fidelity is slightly compromised.
    04:07 📐 Viewing Angles: Adjusting angles helps with reflective and transreflective screens.
    04:44 💡 Brightness: Maximum backlight brightness around 270 nits, suitable for indoor use.
    05:41 🌳 Outdoor Performance: Effective in sunlight, tilting screen helps with reflections.
    06:20 🖼 Matte Screen Protector: Reduces reflections but worsens contrast and readability.
    06:52 🔌 Portability: Can run off a single USB-C cable, suitable for laptops and phones.
    07:55 🖲 Touch Screen: Touchscreen support inconsistent, not optimized for Mac OS.
    08:30 🎛 Menu Navigation: Menu switch uncomfortable, touchscreen navigation unreliable.
    08:56 🔊 Speakers: Built-in stereo speakers are functional but not high-quality.
    09:41 📏 Drawbacks: Reflective glass attracts fingerprints, viewing angle stability, and color accuracy compromises.
    10:31 💼 Specialized Use: Best for outdoor use, less effective indoors due to reflections.

    • @IsidoroPira
      @IsidoroPira 4 месяца назад

      which tecnology you think is the best for eyestrain between eazeye monitors or svd remonitor and also for gaming ?thank you very much

    • @dameanvil
      @dameanvil 4 месяца назад +2

      @@IsidoroPira E-ink

    • @IsidoroPira
      @IsidoroPira 4 месяца назад

      @@dameanvil ok Thanks and for gaming is better rlcd or eazye monitors'? and for eye strin beatween this two? thanks a lot

    • @dameanvil
      @dameanvil 4 месяца назад +1

      @@IsidoroPira For gaming is better to do it less on the best screen you can afford (refresh rate, contrast, and so on)

    • @IsidoroPira
      @IsidoroPira 4 месяца назад

      @@dameanvil so it would be better on the 32 svd monitor rlcsd right'''? thanks for your answers

  • @Change-1820
    @Change-1820 5 месяцев назад +1

    This was a very good video and review. I appreciate your perspective. I have to admit that I did keep thinking Transwarp every time you talked about the difference between e-ink and the screen. 😂 Love the background on your monitors by the way.

  • @letterbomb211
    @letterbomb211 3 месяца назад

    Nice to have on a very well natural illuminated room, otherwise I would stick to e ink

  • @Karma_komodo
    @Karma_komodo 5 месяцев назад +1

    Wavelength spikes aren't a bad thing as you can save a lot of power by just emitting the light that your eye can detect, but yeah screens just have a ton of blue light compared to other sources

  • @wanaan
    @wanaan 4 месяца назад

    would be good for smart watch.

  • @nameberry220
    @nameberry220 5 месяцев назад +1

    Enjoyed the real world comparisons with descriptions ++.

  • @Argelius1
    @Argelius1 2 месяца назад

    Your videos are so good -- expertly written and narrated. Love long and prosper!

  • @tarekullah342
    @tarekullah342 5 месяцев назад +1

    I wonder if it's possible to use the LCD panel as soler panel means when blocking the unnecessary light it will convert that unnecessary lights into electricity.

    • @thomase13
      @thomase13 4 месяца назад

      Fascinating idea!

  • @nameberry220
    @nameberry220 5 месяцев назад

    How's the nxtpaper 11?

  • @duckwerksofficial
    @duckwerksofficial 5 месяцев назад

    Finally!

  • @jcd-k2s
    @jcd-k2s 5 месяцев назад

    The spectrum analysis is interesting, but the brightness of a screen is nothing compared to daylight.

  • @Kraaketaer
    @Kraaketaer 5 месяцев назад +2

    I'm 32 seconds in at this point, and strongly considering not watching any further simply because you keep saying "trans*re*flective" rather than the correct "transflective". If this keeps going, I'm pretty sure my head will explode.

    • @ChalidRaqami
      @ChalidRaqami  5 месяцев назад +4

      AFAIK both can be used interchangeably. I've encountered both in German and quickly googling it also returns both in English - but you're right, that transflective definitely seems to be more commonly used.

    • @Kraaketaer
      @Kraaketaer 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@ChalidRaqami it's more commonly used, including in the title of the Kickstarter for this monitor. Yes, transreflective is also used, and while I'm 99% sure that's due to people misreading the word as it's not exactly a common word, that obviously also means that transreflective is... fine to use? It's understandable, obviously. But transflective is a portmanteau, and for those you generally cut off a part of both words, not just one (i.e. trans(missive)(re)flective, not trans(missive)reflective). The reason I bring this up though is that while transflective doesn't exactly roll off the tongue either, transreflective is just jarring and disturbing to hear pronounced as it forces a weird staccato pronunciation - the mouth movements it needs are just too large to flow easily. IMO it completely ruins the flow of speech and sticks out like a sore thumb every time it's said.

    • @arjanvandenheuvel4522
      @arjanvandenheuvel4522 3 месяца назад +2

      ​@@KraaketaerI find it a bit much to make such a big deal out of this. He's no native English speaker, so little things like this can happen.

    • @Kraaketaer
      @Kraaketaer 3 месяца назад

      @@arjanvandenheuvel4522 I'm obviously well aware of that - but as someone making this kind of content it's also rather important to present things accurately IMO, which includes using correct terminology - especially when discussing relatively new and/or uncommon tech. And ultimately I'm just sharing my experience of watching this, with which he can do whatever he wants.

    • @fraenzchen85
      @fraenzchen85 2 месяца назад

      Whatever. Nobody cares.