Yesssss the Plaintiff had everything down to a selfie of herself on that night. I love a well prepared person. And i can tell she is classy woman. Well done!!
@@taylornicole4554 True but I think it’s more about how she actually was fully prepared with everything that the judge asked for 👍🏽 if the judge asked for a picture of her dinner that night… she probably had it whether or not it proved anything 😂
defendant made a good point though , he said his defense was that she never proved she had her jacket in coat check . and why would a person put a one thousand dollar jacket in a coat check when everyone knows that someone would want to steal a jacket of that high cost . i just think that bigger price tags require bigger proof and this plaintiff never showed a photo of her jacket being given over to coat check . if they found her BF jacket then most likely hers would have been there too if she really had it in coat check . sometimes this judge just gets it wrong .
@@marleonetti7 he should of never had a coat rack or make people sign a waiver if they want to leave their coat he was negligence by not having insurance for such large event so I believe her decision was fair
Exactly, Completely lacked accountability. Sometimes unforeseen things, go wrong when doing business, which in this case was his responsibility. He does, need to, take note of how to plan better next time, but he doesn’t see that.
He’s definitely liable. It’s his event, he offered a promise of safety for their coats and failed to provide it. Her story seems reasonable - it makes sense she’d wear her expensive coat to a big NYE event. His coatcheck fell apart, he failed to provide safety, and even got people’s things stolen. He’s liable. She got the full price because it’s a fairly new coat, it’s a unique and rare designer coat, and that rarity & lack of availability makes her able to get near the value of it. He needs to get insurance, to have cameras, and to have coat check in a more secure location.
I work at a luxury event venue and this is why we don’t offer to hold anything or let anyone store any items anywhere. We refuse to be liable for missing items. A lady put her purse in a random cupboard to not carry it around then was going crazy when it was missing at the end of the night. Way to much liability involved
So true! I was an event coordinator for 6 years & the only things people would lose would be their phones. I can’t imagine if someone would’ve lost their whole purse. But, seriously, who does that if you’re not either VIP or work for the place in some way? She was TRIPPING!! 💯😂😂😂 I bet she thought she was having a good ol funky time too!! Smh 😂😂😂😂😂😂
A lot of event centers, hotels and venues have actually gotten away from the coat check / hold area. It's kind of an old school thing that people no longer want to be liable for. So now they basically say to everyone it's your own responsibility to hold on to your own coats, purses, and bags.
@@ksmith1728 bold assumption based off of minimum info, she literally told us where she put it while she was hysterical asking if we had cameras in the area
Idk about that. Edit: *It was even mentioned at the end that he has provide proper effort into making sure things are secure.* Even if he had the sign up, security still failed at doing their job - so he's still responsible. * and would you check your coat somewhere where no one would be held responsible if it disappears? Lol, come on
I’m proud of you Adrian, it sounds like you’re back on your meds. I wonder how long that will last…we’ll know once you start calling JM a biased racist and spewing garbage out your mouth
Adrian has 2 larceny convictions - ask yourself how this little trash makes proper choices in life. CONVICTED CRIMINALS such as Adrian do nothing but lie, cheat, steal. He blames his failures in life on white people, he HATES white people. No one should give a damn what this ghetto trash thinks about racism. Bigoted black supremacists achieve nothing in life except hate and regret. Keep loosing in life Adrian, it’s what you do best ✊🏾
The plaintiff is a beautiful woman and I’d bet she had on that coat. She’s a woman who appreciates fashion obviously. I learned never to wear expensive outerwear that needs checked.
For people confused on why she got the amount of money she did...I'm an Adjuster, the way it works is you get the amount of what it would cost to replace the item NOW in present day (not what you paid for it) and then you take that amount and subtract for depreciation. The coat was almost brand new so there was not really much depreciation to take out and she only paid 800 because she got a discount... the coat costs over a grand. We do not take into account what you paid for an item... think of it this way, imagine this was for a TV and the TV was sold to you by your best friend for only $20 because they did you a solid when the TV actually costs $500. We would never only give you $20 because that's what you paid, we would give you the full 500 (then add depreciation) because that is how much you WILL have to pay to replace the TV now. We don't penalize you because you got a good deal, we have to make you whole again and able to re purchase the item.
@gabriellasilva2499 I am well aware of that and even said it ("subtract for depreciation") when I said add later I was obviously using the word add in the context of combining, not using it to mean addition lol but thanks?
She's gorgeous and her haircut is 🔥. I'm so ashamed that the defendant didn't understand why he was liable. She shouldn't have had to take him to court at all.
It kills that everyone wants to be an entrepreneur but do not do their due diligence. Either get insurance to protect yourself or don’t offer services that may get you sued for other people’s personal property. It’s not that hard to have a bit of self preservation.
This is clear cut case of negligence. Guy throws a party, charges people for access, takes their coat, fails to secure guests property, loses guests properly, and then is surprised to find he is responsible for missing property??! 😝😂
He could have saved himself time and just went on ahead and paid her but noooooooo he had to find out the hard way. She was prepared and did it effortlessly. You go girl!!! Beautiful and smart.
Understandably the defendant was liable. However, I think it's kinda crazy to wear an expensive coat and check it at a pop-up party...its just asking for trouble.
Defendant doesn’t understand, he is hosting the event. If he offers a service it falls on him to have basic security to safeguard those items. Had he not offered a coat check, it wouldn’t be his fault.
A little business advice: If you required a coat check, then you assumed responsibility. If a coat check was voluntary, then you need to post at the coat check location and on the coat check ticket "not responsible for items lost or stolen"
The coat was only a month ish old so little or no depreciation taken out, also the depreciation is taken out of what it costs to replace the item in present day, not what you paid for it.
Defendant is liable for the missing coat, for he is to make sure of the safety of his coat check system. She was lucky she still had the receipt and brought it to court. He was crazy to think he was not responsible for the safety of his guests' coats.
I don’t understand how she got the value of a brand new coat (more than what she admitted she paid), because on every other case I watch like this, she said you don’t get the value of the item brand new. You get the depreciated value. Update: AGAIN, I hear what y’all are saying… but I’m going off EVERY other case like this I’ve seen her rule on. You don’t have to keep saying the same thing to me. 😄
It was purchase right before it was stolen and the price difference was because when she purchases the next she will not be getting the 20% discount that the company graciously gave her on her original one so she will have to pay full price, so that is the price he is responsible for paying
He provided 2 services that failed which were included in the price of entry: security and a coat check. How does he not understand that it makes him liable? He can say "coat check was free" but that just means that it was a cost he assumed with the entry fee and it isn't an additional cost on top of the entry fee.
The fact that he was lost to why he had to pay for her coat … after taking the $1,000 coat into coat check telling them the coat would be safe giving them a ticket but let people bust in the coat check and take it … don’t provide a coat check if you don’t want to get sued or have insurance if your going to not have control over the events end coat check looks like a attic
the defendants coment in the end when he said "do I have too?!" was so stupid. like YES DUDE YOU HAVE TOO. people paid to get into your party and clearly security wasn't doing their job or you needed more security because people left their coats in your care. it doesn't get any simpler than that.
I'm glad the Plaintiff won, but I'm surprised she was awarded more than she paid for the coat. Even if she received it at a discount, your award is typically capped at what you paid for an item. She got super lucky, and I think it was because that guy was trying so hard to shirk his responsibilities that the Judge just let it slip by her.
That was indeed a cute coat. That's why it's worth having a few high-quality articles of clothing, rather than a bunch of cheap Shein/Amazon mainstream unremarkable crap.
Wow, I wouldn’t want the defendant to organize a school cupcake table. The plaintiff on the other hand could do logistics for the National Guard, she is organized!
“Coat check at your own risk, we are not liable for personal items “. This phrase would’ve went a long way . Especially having it plastered on both the walls and coat check ticket stubs .
Preventing theft is literally the reason why you have a coat check. It's a safe place to keep your coat while at an event. If you don't want to be responsible for someone's coat, don't offer a coat check.
@@Pepper9873 That is NOT the reason why you have coat check . Coat check is simply there for you to not have the burden of walking around an event toting it around . They could careless About “preventing theft “. They just don’t want a bunch of coats lying around , and also a bunch of people complaining about no where to put their coats . I have been to many places (presidents list events ) in which I’ve had to check my coat and believe me , it had nothing to do with them trying to prevent anything . Next time leave the coat in your vehicle - or risk it being stolen .
And the only reason why the plaintiff won is because of the extra circumstances that happened such as them #1 not having a disclaimer . #2 them dropping the coats off of the hangers which was their reasonable duty . And #3 them not having security preventing the mayhem of everyone stealing coats . Otherwise she would’ve been hard pressed to collect any money . And btw I’m on her side . And if this was my case, she would’ve recovered the cost of the coat . If you didn’t catch the sarcasm in my original post then perhaps you should reread . I simply was letting them know of their folly . Shalom
@@adrianknight1406Listen to the usual hater, un-hating for once... but on something as superficial as clothing... and on a woman, no less. Interesting. But, not really. 😁
I'm disappointed in Judge Milian....those blows to that beautiful black Queen was totally unnecessary. I have seen her compliment people who come in "dressed". Is she aware that there are melanin Kings and Queens who can afford an " upscale" life ....the plaintiffs mannerisms did not give off conceit to me AT ALL. WTH I checked out what she had on from head to toe...her witness as well...GO QUEENS❤❤
What type of party was this where people where climbing into coat check and bum rushing people and stealing coats??? I’m glad I don’t party 😂 I’m disgusted at him saying “can she prove her coat was in coat check”
Yesssss the Plaintiff had everything down to a selfie of herself on that night. I love a well prepared person. And i can tell she is classy woman. Well done!!
a selfie doesn't prove that she put the jacket behind the counter 😂
@@taylornicole4554 True but I think it’s more about how she actually was fully prepared with everything that the judge asked for 👍🏽 if the judge asked for a picture of her dinner that night… she probably had it whether or not it proved anything 😂
RIGHT!
@taylornicole4554 It also doesn’t prove she didn’t. She had a witness to corroborate her story and that was good enough for the Judge!
She is a fashion gworl and I'm here for it!! 😍😍
She said oh no… you’re going to pay for my coat! 😂👏👏
I had to look those coats up. Oh yeah, he would have for sure paid lol
Yes!!!! Fabulous!!! I'd be pissed too!!!!
@BlackGirlMystic I’m pretty sure anything any black woman say or do, you agree to it. 🤣🤣
Indeed!
Judge sent me when she said “you’re right you’re not liable for 1,000 you’re liable for 946”😂😂
The comment I came for, because she definitely saved him $54 😂
😂
$946 for a jacket is stupid buying ...the same brand jacket can be bought for $600... she can replace it for that.
The defendant didn’t comprehend that he was responsible to hire appropriate security to maintain crowd control
RIGHT!!!
defendant made a good point though , he said his defense was that she never proved she had her jacket in coat check . and why would a person put a one thousand dollar jacket in a coat check when everyone knows that someone would want to steal a jacket of that high cost . i just think that bigger price tags require bigger proof and this plaintiff never showed a photo of her jacket being given over to coat check . if they found her BF jacket then most likely hers would have been there too if she really had it in coat check . sometimes this judge just gets it wrong .
@@marleonetti7 he should of never had a coat rack or make people sign a waiver if they want to leave their coat he was negligence by not having insurance for such large event so I believe her decision was fair
He understood. He just didn't care.
Exactly, Completely lacked accountability. Sometimes unforeseen things, go wrong when doing business, which in this case was his responsibility. He does, need to, take note of how to plan better next time, but he doesn’t see that.
He’s definitely liable. It’s his event, he offered a promise of safety for their coats and failed to provide it. Her story seems reasonable - it makes sense she’d wear her expensive coat to a big NYE event. His coatcheck fell apart, he failed to provide safety, and even got people’s things stolen. He’s liable. She got the full price because it’s a fairly new coat, it’s a unique and rare designer coat, and that rarity & lack of availability makes her able to get near the value of it. He needs to get insurance, to have cameras, and to have coat check in a more secure location.
@wvrjl she initially paid less because she was given a discount because it was hard to find at first so she broke even
She won’t even take her coat off for court because of the incident 😂
She got coat related ptsd
@@riggamorrischan 🤭🤣🤣
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
Not me hollering!
I work at a luxury event venue and this is why we don’t offer to hold anything or let anyone store any items anywhere. We refuse to be liable for missing items. A lady put her purse in a random cupboard to not carry it around then was going crazy when it was missing at the end of the night. Way to much liability involved
So true! I was an event coordinator for 6 years & the only things people would lose would be their phones. I can’t imagine if someone would’ve lost their whole purse. But, seriously, who does that if you’re not either VIP or work for the place in some way? She was TRIPPING!! 💯😂😂😂
I bet she thought she was having a good ol funky time too!! Smh 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Did you take it ? You have too much information imo
What kind of a stupid woman would leave her purse ANYWHERE !!!!
A lot of event centers, hotels and venues have actually gotten away from the coat check / hold area. It's kind of an old school thing that people no longer want to be liable for. So now they basically say to everyone it's your own responsibility to hold on to your own coats, purses, and bags.
@@ksmith1728 bold assumption based off of minimum info, she literally told us where she put it while she was hysterical asking if we had cameras in the area
The Plantiff was a really cute young lady, well dressed and well mannered ❤️❤️❤️❤️
i like the friend too
Yep, all four of them were well dressed.
Her friend was too!
She should model. She's prettier than most of the high-paid models these days.
Haven't even watched the case yet, but just stopping in to say that mushroom is giving 90s realness😍
It's time to have Pep!
I mean. It looks crisp. 😍
@@themrs.1200 doesn't it?? And with the red lip too??
The Rub Woo was 🫡.
That eye shadow was giving an old school moment too.
He tried it…..I don’t care if my coat came from dollar tree, it’s winter and I came with a coat I expect to leave with one. Pay up.
😂 that’s right, get yo Dollar Tree coat
7:15 😂😂😂 sue wanted to say soooooo badly “ why ain’t there a BIG BLACK guy standing there” 😂😂 she caught herself before she said it though lolol 😂😂😂
yooooo!!!! I gaught that aswell lol.... I waiting for someone to say it lolo..
i was looking for this comment to see if i was the only one 😂😂
I was looking hard for this comment!!! I had to check to be sure I saw what I saw lol
Right! 😂😂😂😂 caught herself
Well looks like great minds because yes baby she stoped herself. It was literally at the tip of her tongue! 😂😂😂
all he needed was a sign that said "Check your Coat at your own risk"
Idk about that. Edit: *It was even mentioned at the end that he has provide proper effort into making sure things are secure.*
Even if he had the sign up, security still failed at doing their job - so he's still responsible.
* and would you check your coat somewhere where no one would be held responsible if it disappears? Lol, come on
EXACTLY !!!😮
Some liabilities can't be waved with a sign.
@@vanessacampbell7110 the cops wouldn't care
@@VladmirPoopN THATS WHAT YOU THINK 🤔. I STILL SAID EXACTLY!!!!!!
I thought the coat looked ugly by itself but damn it looked good on her
Word!
Agreed
She's rocking that Toni Braxton bowl cut😍😍
we jus gon graze ova that ponytail tho??
@@rozirozeyeah we're looking straight past that😂😂
she played on his face when she said well you won't have to pay $1000 i found it cheaper $945, like JM yk that's $1000 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 love her
Sis came prepared!! Love it!
She's gorgeous and that coat was awesome! I hope you like the pink!
The coat looks stupid.
oh baloney, gorgeous, her mother bought that ugly coat.
Yay for the plaintiff 🎉 She looked good as hell in that coat too!
Yes she did!!
This defendant had no defense here. He didn't provide adequate security at his party.
I’m proud of you Adrian, it sounds like you’re back on your meds. I wonder how long that will last…we’ll know once you start calling JM a biased racist and spewing garbage out your mouth
Adrian has 2 larceny convictions - ask yourself how this little trash makes proper choices in life. CONVICTED CRIMINALS such as Adrian do nothing but lie, cheat, steal. He blames his failures in life on white people, he HATES white people. No one should give a damn what this ghetto trash thinks about racism. Bigoted black supremacists achieve nothing in life except hate and regret. Keep loosing in life Adrian, it’s what you do best ✊🏾
The plaintiff is a great representation of how one should conduct themselves in court. She appears to be a class act.
The plaintiff is a beautiful woman and I’d bet she had on that coat. She’s a woman who appreciates fashion obviously. I learned never to wear expensive outerwear that needs checked.
For people confused on why she got the amount of money she did...I'm an Adjuster, the way it works is you get the amount of what it would cost to replace the item NOW in present day (not what you paid for it) and then you take that amount and subtract for depreciation. The coat was almost brand new so there was not really much depreciation to take out and she only paid 800 because she got a discount... the coat costs over a grand. We do not take into account what you paid for an item... think of it this way, imagine this was for a TV and the TV was sold to you by your best friend for only $20 because they did you a solid when the TV actually costs $500. We would never only give you $20 because that's what you paid, we would give you the full 500 (then add depreciation) because that is how much you WILL have to pay to replace the TV now. We don't penalize you because you got a good deal, we have to make you whole again and able to re purchase the item.
You actually subtract depreciation, not add it
Unless it's Judge Judy's courtroom & she gives whatever she feels like 😟
@gabriellasilva2499 I am well aware of that and even said it ("subtract for depreciation") when I said add later I was obviously using the word add in the context of combining, not using it to mean addition lol but thanks?
@aerotaken5357 I don't usually watch her, does she do that? It also isn't a legal courtroom either so she pretty much can do that unfortunately
Wrong it's value of deappreciates items
She's gorgeous and her haircut is 🔥. I'm so ashamed that the defendant didn't understand why he was liable. She shouldn't have had to take him to court at all.
It kills that everyone wants to be an entrepreneur but do not do their due diligence. Either get insurance to protect yourself or don’t offer services that may get you sued for other people’s personal property. It’s not that hard to have a bit of self preservation.
Remind me to miss the guy's parties. 'Just because we take their coats into our care doesn't mean they necessarily get them back' 🙃
The coat is hideous.
@@lisaslusarczyk7813That's your opinion. What's your point? She deserved to be robbed?
@lisaslusarczyk7813 does that make the difference for the case?
Defendant: "This not for profit party cost $30K."
Also Defendant: "I have to pay ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS?????!!!!"
And that should tell you all you need.
Ya'll may say her coat is ugly but she likes it .
I like it too the shape is 🔥
She just introduced me to anew brand. I’m about to get me one that coat is 🔥
I just came for sis haircut, she slayed that hair honey!! ❤❤
This is clear cut case of negligence. Guy throws a party, charges people for access, takes their coat, fails to secure guests property, loses guests properly, and then is surprised to find he is responsible for missing property??! 😝😂
I’m only here to say how fly she is. Go girl! 💁🏾♀️😍
Her style is really dope 😍
Really ❤
Ignorance is not knowing something,
stupidity is not be able to learn.
This “ producer” proved what he is.
Yall noticed that judge had to slow down and catch herself from saying "Big BLACK man"?
yesssss
I LOVEEEEEE the Plaintiff n her friend style omg lol😍😍
Love her personality! She’s so cute!
She could hve saved herself the $1000 or whatever she paid and just wore trash bags. That coat was ugly!
thank you man that coat was ugly.
True 😂
Word
hideous coat. looked like it came from Burlington coat factory.
Not the
Point. You could have expressed that elsewhere
That's the ugliest coat ever! 🤣🤣🤣
Yes, yes it is.
For real
Maybe someone mistook it for a trash bag on the floor and threw it out 😅
@@lukerinderknecht2982 Lmaoooo 🤣
The plaintiff is gorgeous. I definitely would have remembered her!
He could have saved himself time and just went on ahead and paid her but noooooooo he had to find out the hard way. She was prepared and did it effortlessly. You go girl!!! Beautiful and smart.
Understandably the defendant was liable. However, I think it's kinda crazy to wear an expensive coat and check it at a pop-up party...its just asking for trouble.
Defendant doesn’t understand, he is hosting the event. If he offers a service it falls on him to have basic security to safeguard those items. Had he not offered a coat check, it wouldn’t be his fault.
That coat is hideous 😂
She is so beautiful and prepared❤❤❤❤❤❤
Just say it judge “a big black guy” lol
ON THEEE TIP OF HER TONGUE! 😂
@@hey2grl yeap 😂😂
I said the same thing!!😂😂😂
Lmao glad I'm not the only one who caught that
😂😂😂 righht
A little business advice: If you required a coat check, then you assumed responsibility. If a coat check was voluntary, then you need to post at the coat check location and on the coat check ticket "not responsible for items lost or stolen"
How u throw a event and not be held liable..smh
I love her hair and outfit! Oh, and the coat lol😍😍😍
PLAINTIFFS HOW GET UP WAS TOO CUTE! LOVED THE VIBE
I don't need to buy a jacket to get a sumo wrestler figure, yet alone spend $800+ for that 😂😂
You must already look like a sumo wrestler?😂😂😂😂
@@davidwhite3180 I've had an indulgent summer, ok? 😅 🌭🍦🍺
The guy in blue when Harvey asked a question has a Peter Tork vibe going on. 😊😊
Plaintiff and her witness are Gorgeous 🥺😩 the Fits are 💪🏽
So why does she get $$ for a new coat? I thought you got reimbursed for the cost it would be to replace it at the time it was ' stolen'
She had just bought it in November, max 2 mo. prior to the incident so it was considered still new.
The coat was only a month ish old so little or no depreciation taken out, also the depreciation is taken out of what it costs to replace the item in present day, not what you paid for it.
these and she had got a discount she got it for $880 instead of full price
She's sharp and intelligent.....Beautiful young lady...
I love the Plaintiff's style!
Defendant is liable for the missing coat, for he is to make sure of the safety of his coat check system. She was lucky she still had the receipt and brought it to court. He was crazy to think he was not responsible for the safety of his guests' coats.
"WHERE'S MAX!" 😂😂😂 she's so funny
U know u gonna lose when the judge starts cursing 😂 😊
Forget insurance, $1.99 at Office Max gets you a large piece of cardboard that you can write “Not responsible for personal items” on.
yall weird asf in these comments..
Why you say that🤨🤨
@@delenareed9731 the way some ppl are talkin about the plaintiff..just disrespectful for no reason
@@yazzy03 ohhh I thought most were saying that Defendant was liable for not providing adequate security
I don’t understand how she got the value of a brand new coat (more than what she admitted she paid), because on every other case I watch like this, she said you don’t get the value of the item brand new. You get the depreciated value.
Update: AGAIN, I hear what y’all are saying… but I’m going off EVERY other case like this I’ve seen her rule on. You don’t have to keep saying the same thing to me. 😄
I believe it's because it was pretty new. She got money for it before the holidays.
If it's a designer, it doesn't lose value unless it's actually defaced.
Really but some get more valuable not less
She bought it less than a month before it was stolen.
It was purchase right before it was stolen and the price difference was because when she purchases the next she will not be getting the 20% discount that the company graciously gave her on her original one so she will have to pay full price, so that is the price he is responsible for paying
He provided 2 services that failed which were included in the price of entry: security and a coat check. How does he not understand that it makes him liable? He can say "coat check was free" but that just means that it was a cost he assumed with the entry fee and it isn't an additional cost on top of the entry fee.
The plaintiff and her witness have good style ❤
The fact that he was lost to why he had to pay for her coat … after taking the $1,000 coat into coat check telling them the coat would be safe giving them a ticket but let people bust in the coat check and take it … don’t provide a coat check if you don’t want to get sued or have insurance if your going to not have control over the events end coat check looks like a attic
That is an ugly coat. She's better off that it was stolen from her.
the defendants coment in the end when he said "do I have too?!" was so stupid. like YES DUDE YOU HAVE TOO. people paid to get into your party and clearly security wasn't doing their job or you needed more security because people left their coats in your care. it doesn't get any simpler than that.
I'm glad the Plaintiff won, but I'm surprised she was awarded more than she paid for the coat. Even if she received it at a discount, your award is typically capped at what you paid for an item. She got super lucky, and I think it was because that guy was trying so hard to shirk his responsibilities that the Judge just let it slip by her.
It's the cost of replacing the item at the value it is now. She received a discount for the first one
Not case related at all, but I’m forever a fan of the Toni Braxton haircut that the plaintiff has.
Don’t offer coat check next time. As soon as you do that you are liable. Let the guests be responsible for their own stuff lol
Hey beautiful queen ❤
Thankgoodness I’m not a fashionista
That coat is absurd. She should be happy it's gone !!
😂
2:37 I can't wait to find a coat that makes me look like Quasimodo.
why do people always try to get over.. he knows he’s accountable
That was indeed a cute coat. That's why it's worth having a few high-quality articles of clothing, rather than a bunch of cheap Shein/Amazon mainstream unremarkable crap.
What's the difference? To show off?
They should sue security if they hired them 😮
Wow, I wouldn’t want the defendant to organize a school cupcake table. The plaintiff on the other hand could do logistics for the National Guard, she is organized!
Most museums and cafes have a sign that says they are not liable for theft by a coat check where I live
I’m sorry but that coat is so ugly, I wouldn’t wear it if I found it at Goodwill and they were giving it away.
How come it wasn't the value of a used coat instead of replacement cost? Often people get too little to actually pay for a replacement.
I like the way those two girls dress. Their style is cute
The plaintiff was a pleasure 🥰…… prepared too ….. ❤it
The defendant and his witness are definitely related. He must've hired his nephew for the coat check area.
The plaintiff is so pretty! Love that hair on her
The Plaintiff is GORGEOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMN!!!!!
“Coat check at your own risk, we are not liable for personal items “. This phrase would’ve went a long way . Especially having it plastered on both the walls and coat check ticket stubs .
Preventing theft is literally the reason why you have a coat check. It's a safe place to keep your coat while at an event. If you don't want to be responsible for someone's coat, don't offer a coat check.
@@Pepper9873 That is NOT the reason why you have coat check . Coat check is simply there for you to not have the burden of walking around an event toting it around . They could careless About “preventing theft “. They just don’t want a bunch of coats lying around , and also a bunch of people complaining about no where to put their coats . I have been to many places (presidents list events ) in which I’ve had to check my coat and believe me , it had nothing to do with them trying to prevent anything . Next time leave the coat in your vehicle - or risk it being stolen .
And the only reason why the plaintiff won is because of the extra circumstances that happened such as them #1 not having a disclaimer . #2 them dropping the coats off of the hangers which was their reasonable duty . And #3 them not having security preventing the mayhem of everyone stealing coats . Otherwise she would’ve been hard pressed to collect any money . And btw I’m on her side . And if this was my case, she would’ve recovered the cost of the coat . If you didn’t catch the sarcasm in my original post then perhaps you should reread . I simply was letting them know of their folly . Shalom
OMG, I remember when this case originally aired. I think that this must have aired at least 15 years ago if not more.
What?? This wasn’t 15 years ago. Doug (hallway guy) returned to the show in 2016. This was no more than 7 years ago 🤨
Who wears that coat to court haha. It's bad ass. It's not for court. I can't 😅 and I wrote this before I watched the video fyi.
Stop hating and criticizing her and watch the case. Folks always paying attention to someone else's dressing style instead of their own.
@@adrianknight1406rare adrian W
@@adrianknight1406Listen to the usual hater, un-hating for once... but on something as superficial as clothing... and on a woman, no less. Interesting. But, not really. 😁
@adrianknight1406 I'm sorry you don't understand the meanings of hate or criticize.
Did anyone catch what he said at the end in the hall? Do not go to his events
I know it's subjective, but that is one ugly coat. Are there many people wanting to look like a sumo wrestler just for kicks? 😂
They both know better.
Plaintiff is so gorgeous! ❤
When I saw the thumbnail, I thought it was a 90’s R&B music video.
With taxes, she should have got the$1000.
I'm disappointed in Judge Milian....those blows to that beautiful black Queen was totally unnecessary. I have seen her compliment people who come in "dressed".
Is she aware that there are melanin Kings and Queens who can afford an " upscale" life ....the plaintiffs mannerisms did not give off conceit to me AT ALL.
WTH
I checked out what she had on from head to toe...her witness as well...GO QUEENS❤❤
College has taught them nothing spending 800 dollars on a coat with money that was a gift.
slow down girl, you talk to fast. you throw a NON PROFIT party for 30,000 but won't pay a thousand for the coat.
The judge caught herself she was ready to say.. why wasn’t there a big Black guy ! Lol
Justice For the People w JM is coming!
She should've gotten $1000 for his hassle. Pay her bro.
The defendant is shameful! Such irresponsible 😂
What type of party was this where people where climbing into coat check and bum rushing people and stealing coats??? I’m glad I don’t party 😂
I’m disgusted at him saying “can she prove her coat was in coat check”
They were drunk lol and cold 😂😂