I think, had Warrior lived on, he'd probably be considered by the media a quasi 'white nationalist'. There's no way Warrior could have kept quiet about the racial changes in the USA, especially when you see what black populations have done to cities like Chicago, Detroit and others. There are parts of the US that resemble the Third World, mainly on account of the demographics resembling the Third World.
I had never heard of this Reginald Jones guy that did the opening speech, but damn that dude can speak. He was talking about things back in 2003 that are now popular today among conservatives. The man is based.
I don't agree with everything that he has to say, but it is easy to tell that the man has a true conviction to what he says, he honestly believes in what he says, and he has an extraordinary passion. That's hard not to respect and admire.
Warrior is just on a higher intellect ,some people never even ponder the things he speaks of . He is very.intelligent, his wrestling compadres are all followers , and they never stood up for themselves , they.couldnt fathom how Warrior navigated through the professional wrestling world with quickness and ease, and don't forget TALENT , he was just better at it than the old timers and malingerers that would ingratiate themselves to Vince Mahon.Warrior had his career /history.of his greatness rewritten to discredit him , by a bunch of gealous "adults that acted more like elementary school children
@@OneUltimateWarrior I agree. Trump is pro-abortion but lies about it to win elections. Warrior was warning about these sorts of things, even correctly calling bush a liberal.
Yes, it he was still alive I wonder could have ran President. If he did he probably get the same criticism like Trump have but at least Warrior stand up for himself more. Plus, just like Jesse Ventura he defeated Vince McMahon in court for the rights of his Name and trademark
I agree with ultimate warrior. I'm non white but all human. I just put that out there for far left haters. He is absolutely right. We as Americans have to know what the us constitution stood for and continue to hold the system accountable and responsible for their actions. Not be a slave and turn social media into God or a demi god. It's sad how many people say watch what you say you can be cancelled. I'm like you know anyone that violates free speech is illegal and unconstitutional right? Social Media is trying to dumb the masses down and illegally take our rights away. So much to the point I tell homeless people if you can't find a job sue RUclips or Google. You can always find some loophole that they violated. The coronavirus is illegal and you can't be forced to take a vaccine.
It's clear he's a sharp guy and well-read, but I take issue with him repeatedly declaring "right" and "wrong" as analogs for "true" and "false". There are contexts these can be used interchangeably but the bulk of his speech is about his preferred moral reasoning framework where degrees of "right" and "wrong" must be bootstrapped using propositions and assumptions that may be "true", "false" or even "invalid". It begs the question when you presume right = true and wrong = false in a discussion of moral reasoning and it's the basis of his argument that convervatism=true=right, liberalism=false=wrong.
remember watching orig b cast, blew me away, this is somthing u should watch w your kids, today more than ever .it expose s the left s' m.o. listen to the meaning of his words , if u cant get it , try. if u still dont get it, u never will, nothing worth attaining comes ' easy'.oh yeah, Merry X mass🎅🎄🎅🎄🎅🎄
When ultimate warrior showed his wrestling video, some people laughed, so he shot them. Later, at the trial he said 'i'll be waiting for you in heaven: with a gun'
I haven't listened to him here yet but I think he's a misunderstood person. He's not a nice guy, but practices tough love. Very disagreeble, yet passionate person.
@@Keranu He's a polarizing figure, that's for sure. Conservatism is intolerance for those who don't share the same beliefs as they do. The Council of Conservative Citizens is a prime example of this. He might be right on some things, but is clearly clueless or wrong on other things. His moral relativism concept is a complete and utter joke.
@@pbanik I can admire his passion. I don't get the impression Warrior is all that well studied in poltics (I could be wrong), but I think he means what he says and will stand by it. In fact were he around today, I think he'd be something of a lone wolf around Republicans. I don't recal Warrior talking about moral relatvism. And I can't imagine he'd embrace that concept lol.
@@Keranu Well I think he would be more along the lines of a Trump Republican than a traditional Republican. I think he equates conservativism with right and good and liberalism with wrong and evil, or implies that. Things aren't necessarily black and white all the time, like Warrior seems to suggest. There's gray/grey areas at times. An example would be maybe police going undercover, pretending to be bad/evil to catch people who are bad. Espionage might be another example. I think there are very few examples of people who are completely good or evil if any. I think most of us fall somewhere in between the continuum of good and evil. There might be times when being bad/evil might be necessary, such as protecting yourself and/or others from a person or people trying to do the same to you and/or others. Conservatism isn't all good, and liberalism isn't all bad, like Warrior implies. There are parts of conservatism that is bad and there are parts of liberalism is good. Entertainment and the arts would be mostly dead if it wasn't for liberals, and the same goes for science and technology, where liberals are the majority. It's good to be conservative in some situations, like personal finance and spending, but it's also good to be a liberal in some areas like social areas, or helping people who need it if you have the means to help. In terms of actual intelligence, conservatives and liberals on average people might be surprised to hear are pretty equal. Business also has liberals, and Trump had to dissolve his business council because he couldn't get along with them, and people were quitting. He's a liberal who appeals to evangelicals, conspiracy theorists, religious fundamentalists of different religions, altright/extremeright/farright, white supreamacists and neo-Nazi types, who is clueless when it comes to science judging by his comments. He has also been convicted of misappropriation of funds from his own charity and running a university that was really a fraud or scam.
I pretty much agree with everything he said, other than the creator rubbish. He was right Ayn Rand was brilliant, but the athiesm thing was one of her biggest stregnths. Consevatism does not need a creator, politics and religions dont mix.
No Creator, huh? Try explaining life, consciousness, intelligence, rationality, morality, values, the undeniable design, order, and mind-blowing complexities of biochemical systems and the cosmos, just to name a few, without a Creator. Have fun with that. Politics and religions don't mix? It's a good thing 99% of America's founders did not agree with you; otherwise, we wouldn't be having this discussion now, or ever. The Warrior was right: Atheism is ignorant and stupid. It's even worse than that, though. Atheism/materialism is actually the pinnacle of irrationality and absurdity. Here it is in a nutshell: "Nothing accidentally caused everything." [Note: Nothing literally means non-existence. In other words, no matter, no energy, no space, no time- *nothing* ! Or, to make it even clearer, as Aristotle is believed to have said, "Nothing is what rocks dream about."]
Pretty ignorant statement. You atheists lost this debate a long time ago but are still in denial with most of the world. Show me 1 study where 1 protein machine accidentally assembled from a vat of amino acids even 1 time. I'll wait.
@@gamebro511 Do you even realise how igronant your statement is? Athiests lost what debate? that not being christian was one of Ann Rand's greatest stregnths. What does that have to do with a protein machine and amino acids? Im guessing you are confusing abiogenesis with the thoughts and opinions of a writer and philosopher.
Warrior, you continue to inspire me, long after you're demise.
One of the most insightful speeches I've EVER heard - 20yrs before his time! A Prophet Warrior was!
RIP Warrior, sadly missed
Karma is a Bitch.
@@MovieEggman yeah tell that to the people that made RUclips and Google and yourself... Karma is a bitch that discriminates no one.
@@MovieEggman So is your mom
true to Warrior form, this speech is prophetic in regards to what is going on today
and what makes you say that?
A lot are conservative and yet do not realize that.
A fellow union worker, many years ago(after2000).
If he only knew how liberalism festered...
I think, had Warrior lived on, he'd probably be considered by the media a quasi 'white nationalist'. There's no way Warrior could have kept quiet about the racial changes in the USA, especially when you see what black populations have done to cities like Chicago, Detroit and others. There are parts of the US that resemble the Third World, mainly on account of the demographics resembling the Third World.
Warrior without a doubt would have endorsed Trump. Shame he didn't see him get elected.
I had never heard of this Reginald Jones guy that did the opening speech, but damn that dude can speak. He was talking about things back in 2003 that are now popular today among conservatives. The man is based.
I miss Warrior’s passion and wisdom. He inspired, and continues to inspire, me every time I hear him speak.
Warrior warned us!! Preach my hero
I don't agree with everything that he has to say, but it is easy to tell that the man has a true conviction to what he says, he honestly believes in what he says, and he has an extraordinary passion. That's hard not to respect and admire.
Thats because you have a little bit of Democrat in you
Warrior is just on a higher intellect ,some people never even ponder the things he speaks of . He is very.intelligent, his wrestling compadres are all followers , and they never stood up for themselves , they.couldnt fathom how Warrior navigated through the professional wrestling world with quickness and ease, and don't forget TALENT , he was just better at it than the old timers and malingerers that would ingratiate themselves to Vince Mahon.Warrior had his career /history.of his greatness rewritten to discredit him , by a bunch of gealous "adults that acted more like elementary school children
He had charisma. You can't teach that.
James Brian Helwig. A highly intelligent conservative and motivational warrior! He is missed.
Yes, he certainly is, Mr. Hamar😔 Good Lord rest his soul😇
Ultimate is rolling over today
The funny part is Dana saying he wouldn't have supported Trump. Give me a break. 🤣
@@OneUltimateWarrior I agree. Trump is pro-abortion but lies about it to win elections. Warrior was warning about these sorts of things, even correctly calling bush a liberal.
Wow these are two amazing speakers, both well done.
He was such a brilliant, articulate speaker.
He was (*´ω｀*)
Must not have taken many chair shots to the head while wrestling.
LOAD THE SPACE SHIP WITH THE ROCKER FUEL, LOAD IT WITH THE WARRIORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
😂😂😂
Warrior's speech here is mad prophetic
"Stinky Liberal Daddy!!!" I LOVE it 👏🤣🤣🤣
Man I wish he was around for Trump. He would’ve been such a great Supporter.
Yes, it he was still alive I wonder could have ran President. If he did he probably get the same criticism like Trump have but at least Warrior stand up for himself more. Plus, just like Jesse Ventura he defeated Vince McMahon in court for the rights of his Name and trademark
Never forgotten. The legend lives on forever
Jesse "The Body" Ventura also retains the rights to his character's name
Warrior was right. Lord have mercy on our souls
Alsome ,thank you Warrior , RIP,
He will always be my childhood hero
Warrior at 59:00
I knew Warrior went on a speaking tour but never seen this before.
Sooooo much present day truth in Reginald Jones speech it's mad
1:43:36 "And the rest of you call yourselves conservatives?" Great.
lol no shit....great
Ultimate Warrior will always be my #1 of all time.
F the Naysayers & Liars!
Warrior is the 🐐 he even made Santa Claus his bitch.
Reggie and Warrior; the Ultimate Political Tag Team
Any hardcore Warrior fan was watching this in 2003 on CSPAN 😂
The ironic thing is his wife and daughters aren't so conservative today.
It's insane how relevant this is today!
I agree with ultimate warrior. I'm non white but all human. I just put that out there for far left haters. He is absolutely right. We as Americans have to know what the us constitution stood for and continue to hold the system accountable and responsible for their actions. Not be a slave and turn social media into God or a demi god. It's sad how many people say watch what you say you can be cancelled. I'm like you know anyone that violates free speech is illegal and unconstitutional right? Social Media is trying to dumb the masses down and illegally take our rights away. So much to the point I tell homeless people if you can't find a job sue RUclips or Google. You can always find some loophole that they violated. The coronavirus is illegal and you can't be forced to take a vaccine.
1:06:20 for the warrior speech
From s small town he was extremely impressionable. This is Dana talking
What an impressive speech. Warrior was ahead of his time.
I like Reginald Jones' speech.
Yeah his speech is incredible. I had never heard of him before, I was surprised how much of what he said is now popular today. He's based.
It's clear he's a sharp guy and well-read, but I take issue with him repeatedly declaring "right" and "wrong" as analogs for "true" and "false". There are contexts these can be used interchangeably but the bulk of his speech is about his preferred moral reasoning framework where degrees of "right" and "wrong" must be bootstrapped using propositions and assumptions that may be "true", "false" or even "invalid". It begs the question when you presume right = true and wrong = false in a discussion of moral reasoning and it's the basis of his argument that convervatism=true=right, liberalism=false=wrong.
Hard to believe this was 20 years ago. His words are still just as incoherent today as they were back then. Inspiring
Time flies!
remember watching orig b cast, blew me away, this is somthing u should watch w your kids, today more than ever .it expose s the left s' m.o. listen to the meaning of his words , if u cant get it , try. if u still dont get it, u never will, nothing worth attaining comes ' easy'.oh yeah, Merry X mass🎅🎄🎅🎄🎅🎄
1:05 Warrior starts
Dude coulda been best president ever
But look at today's society was the warrior wrong? on some stuff I don't really want to put down but was he wrong ? because now look 😳
RIP Jim / Ultimate Warrior
At first I thought the first guy speaking was talking about Ultimate Warrior doing backup vocals for Parliament Funkadelic 😂
When ultimate warrior showed his wrestling video, some people laughed, so he shot them. Later, at the trial he said 'i'll be waiting for you in heaven: with a gun'
guy was a real nut.
You make too much sense man
What was he talking about?
Destrucity.
Mike Galvin conservatism vs liberalism.
Life vs death.
Basically common sense vs feelings.
Instagram: AWrestlingHistorian ok I read the urban dictionary. Never took that as knowledge. This reading makes sense.
Mike Galvin Are you serious or being a smart ass? I genuinely can't tell. Please make it clear for me
@@ReaperMF1 forget it, I'm just an uneducated man who can't understand the complicated things in life.
Anybody notice how Warrior will put others down in the same breath build himself up . Pretty insecure .
You apparently didn’t truly listen to a word he said.
I haven't listened to him here yet but I think he's a misunderstood person. He's not a nice guy, but practices tough love. Very disagreeble, yet passionate person.
@@Keranu He's a polarizing figure, that's for sure. Conservatism is intolerance for those who don't share the same beliefs as they do. The Council of Conservative Citizens is a prime example of this. He might be right on some things, but is clearly clueless or wrong on other things. His moral relativism concept is a complete and utter joke.
@@pbanik I can admire his passion. I don't get the impression Warrior is all that well studied in poltics (I could be wrong), but I think he means what he says and will stand by it. In fact were he around today, I think he'd be something of a lone wolf around Republicans.
I don't recal Warrior talking about moral relatvism. And I can't imagine he'd embrace that concept lol.
@@Keranu Well I think he would be more along the lines of a Trump Republican than a traditional Republican. I think he equates conservativism with right and good and liberalism with wrong and evil, or implies that. Things aren't necessarily black and white all the time, like Warrior seems to suggest. There's gray/grey areas at times. An example would be maybe police going undercover, pretending to be bad/evil to catch people who are bad. Espionage might be another example. I think there are very few examples of people who are completely good or evil if any. I think most of us fall somewhere in between the continuum of good and evil. There might be times when being bad/evil might be necessary, such as protecting yourself and/or others from a person or people trying to do the same to you and/or others. Conservatism isn't all good, and liberalism isn't all bad, like Warrior implies. There are parts of conservatism that is bad and there are parts of liberalism is good. Entertainment and the arts would be mostly dead if it wasn't for liberals, and the same goes for science and technology, where liberals are the majority. It's good to be conservative in some situations, like personal finance and spending, but it's also good to be a liberal in some areas like social areas, or helping people who need it if you have the means to help. In terms of actual intelligence, conservatives and liberals on average people might be surprised to hear are pretty equal. Business also has liberals, and Trump had to dissolve his business council because he couldn't get along with them, and people were quitting. He's a liberal who appeals to evangelicals, conspiracy theorists, religious fundamentalists of different religions, altright/extremeright/farright, white supreamacists and neo-Nazi types, who is clueless when it comes to science judging by his comments. He has also been convicted of misappropriation of funds from his own charity and running a university that was really a fraud or scam.
I pretty much agree with everything he said, other than the creator rubbish. He was right Ayn Rand was brilliant, but the athiesm thing was one of her biggest stregnths. Consevatism does not need a creator, politics and religions dont mix.
Therealmiracleworker so stupid to say politics and religion don’t mix bc if there is a creator than he has rules.
No Creator, huh? Try explaining life, consciousness, intelligence, rationality, morality, values, the undeniable design, order, and mind-blowing complexities of biochemical systems and the cosmos, just to name a few, without a Creator. Have fun with that. Politics and religions don't mix? It's a good thing 99% of America's founders did not agree with you; otherwise, we wouldn't be having this discussion now, or ever. The Warrior was right: Atheism is ignorant and stupid. It's even worse than that, though. Atheism/materialism is actually the pinnacle of irrationality and absurdity. Here it is in a nutshell: "Nothing accidentally caused everything." [Note: Nothing literally means non-existence. In other words, no matter, no energy, no space, no time- *nothing* ! Or, to make it even clearer, as Aristotle is believed to have said, "Nothing is what rocks dream about."]
Pretty ignorant statement.
You atheists lost this debate a long time ago but are still in denial with most of the world.
Show me 1 study where 1 protein machine accidentally assembled from a vat of amino acids even 1 time.
I'll wait.
@@gamebro511 Do you even realise how igronant your statement is? Athiests lost what debate? that not being christian was one of Ann Rand's greatest stregnths.
What does that have to do with a protein machine and amino acids? Im guessing you are confusing abiogenesis with the thoughts and opinions of a writer and philosopher.
I think the world has enough or more than enough problems as it is. A theocracy would just add to them.