I’m going to demo these, but really just want a new slicer. Loved that ski! Went to Solomons which have been great, but the slicers were just so much fun!
Will definitely try the cross line. Discovered dynastar just recently and I'm in love! So underrated. Just wish they'd make a Mpro 108 in 180ish- now that would be a WEAPON!
I wish they’d produce a 187cm Mfree 108. The gap between 182 and 192cms it’s quite big… an intermediate option would turn these into the perfect ski. 👍🏻
I hear ya, but for the mpros. I got a mpro 90 last year on a whim cus I needed a "groomer" ski and man did it blow my socks off! There are times the 179 felt too long but after trying the next size down 170 those felt way short. I want the mpro in a 108 that's not 192. I could get the frees in that size but I just love the aggressive progressive feel of the mpros!
I'm 5'8" and 160 pounds. 71 years old on 182 cm M-Free 108's on telemark gear. Last year in the Wasatch, I got a lot of use out of them! They replaced a pair of older Armada JJs. The Dynastars are less prone to being deflected in chop as the runs get packed out. They were pretty nice on groomers even. 192's would be too much for my application, but the 182's are about perfect. This year, I'm going for a pair of M-Cross 88's in a 168 to get the 13 m turn radius! These will be my new carvers for the season. I have a narrower pair of carvers, but on edge, I tend to "boot out" in the turns as they're 82 underfoot. Looking forward to getting them on the snow!
I’m going to demo these, but really just want a new slicer. Loved that ski! Went to Solomons which have been great, but the slicers were just so much fun!
Will definitely try the cross line. Discovered dynastar just recently and I'm in love! So underrated. Just wish they'd make a Mpro 108 in 180ish- now that would be a WEAPON!
I wish they’d produce a 187cm Mfree 108.
The gap between 182 and 192cms it’s quite big… an intermediate option would turn these into the perfect ski. 👍🏻
Just rock the 192s and get stronger 💪
don't be scared of a 192, it's not that big. Compares to a 189 in a lot of indy ski brands.
I hear ya, but for the mpros. I got a mpro 90 last year on a whim cus I needed a "groomer" ski and man did it blow my socks off! There are times the 179 felt too long but after trying the next size down 170 those felt way short. I want the mpro in a 108 that's not 192. I could get the frees in that size but I just love the aggressive progressive feel of the mpros!
I'm 5'8" and 160 pounds. 71 years old on 182 cm M-Free 108's on telemark gear. Last year in the Wasatch, I got a lot of use out of them! They replaced a pair of older Armada JJs. The Dynastars are less prone to being deflected in chop as the runs get packed out. They were pretty nice on groomers even. 192's would be too much for my application, but the 182's are about perfect.
This year, I'm going for a pair of M-Cross 88's in a 168 to get the 13 m turn radius! These will be my new carvers for the season. I have a narrower pair of carvers, but on edge, I tend to "boot out" in the turns as they're 82 underfoot. Looking forward to getting them on the snow!
@@kayakutah 71 years and skiing I aspire to be like you man! Keep rocking and the mcross were fantastic groomer skis when I was using them this week!