Piers Morgan: My Controversial Interview with ‘Real-Life’ Martha | Lorraine
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 май 2024
- He's back! Piers Morgan returns to breakfast TV for one morning only as he joins Lorraine to discuss his interview with Fiona Harvey - the woman believed to be the real-life Martha from the hit Netflix show 'Baby Reindeer.’ The interview has over 10 million views so far. But was it right to do it at all?
Piers responds to the backlash and answers some tough questions from Lorraine.
Subscribe now for more! bit.ly/1KyA9sV
Broadcast on 14/05/24
Like, follow and subscribe to Lorraine!
Catch up on the ITV Hub: bit.ly/2Yvjtyv
Website: bit.ly/1E6BlKW
RUclips: bit.ly/18cHdtx
Facebook: on. 1E6Bhep
Twitter: goo.gl/R5Jxmp
Lorraine brings you up-to-date topical stories, the biggest celebrity interviews and tasty recipes as well as finger-on-the-pulse fashion tips with Mark Heyes and health advice from Dr Hilary Jones.
Presenter Lorraine Kelly welcomes guests in her warm and friendly studio setting as she interviews your favourite celebrity guests and a-list stars as well and delving into the world of food, fashion, health and fun.
Join Lorraine every weekday on ITV and STV at 9.00am.
www.itv.com
www.stv.tv
#lorraine #piersmorgan #piersmorganinterview #babyreindeer #fionaharvey #martha 
Развлечения
Who’s going to interview Lorraine about her interview with piers about his interview with Fiona
😂😂
hahhahahahhahahahaa .. I wonder
The inception of interviews lol
phill schofield
😂😂😂
listening to morgan spout off about the duty of care when he ran a tabloid that hacked into people's phones is too rich to be believed.
Millie Dowlers phone after she died. He is disgusting. But he is a good interviewer
Funny though 😂
Rich people with power vs regular people is different care of duty!!
I wouldn‘t pin it all on Piers. Times have changed, especially in journalism. Piers is/was no worse than anyone else.
@@etch-a-sketch Yep, plus the fact nobody forced her to go on it.
She’s mental enough to enjoy the attention.
Baby Reindeer Credits: This program is based on real events, however certain characters, names, incidents, locations and dialogue have been fictionalised or dramatised for dramatic purposes.
If it says that not it didn't use to, its to late Netflix if they lied on her.
Baby Reindeer Opening Titles: THIS IS A TRUE STORY.
@@FormOverFlairhow can it be true if one’s called Martha and one’s called Fiona. You’re not a robot, it’s clearly based on a true story
@@Jack_B_guin_87Nope. It’s a true story.
They only changed what was listed above.
The story itself is true as stated.
@@woowah32 so who is Martha? And who is Fiona?
It's annoying that Piers keeps pushing the point about her conviction because Gadd has already stated that his real stalker was never actually convicted and that part of the story was fictionalized for the show.
But was she convicted for the stalking of the MPs wife?
Then it shouldn’t have said “this is a true story” at the start. What else isn’t true.
@@CT-vm4gf Did you watch the show? The parts that were add for effect have notations at the end of the series.
@@CT-vm4gfclearly states that some people and events have been fictionalised.
@@Lauren_3000No not according to the victim. A interim order was put in place. Fiona did not defend against the order but did stop the harassment.
The victim gave a interview to the mirror.
Piers is going to be her next victim 😂😂😂
Couldn't think of a more deserving man
Wonderful news 😂😂
We can only hope 😂
I think she was his. Peirs doesn’t condemn Israel for genocide and repeatedly allows those supporting it to have a platform on his channel
Karma
Fiona will be on her 800th facebook post annihilating poor Lorraine 😂
Looks like they’ve blurred some things out in this video. So she’s threatening every media outlet with legal threats. This is going to backfire tremendously when she has more of her lies exposed!
If anyone is unstable it’s that woman he had on last night who kept interrupting everyone.
I know!!! That woman is just bonkers !! It was like being in a children’s playground
That woman should be banned from TV. She’s not equipped to be interviewed.
Christine Eubanks ?
@@plasticbob556 no, some obnoxious cow
Flipping dislike that woman so much, should keep muting her mic when shes like that , officer tatum said it best 😂
The end cresits say
"This show is based on real events : however certain names , characters, incidents , locations and dialogue have been fictionalised for dramatic purposes.
People never watch that. It's a good addition since it technically proves they never claimed everything was 100% true. But since most people don't wait until the end of credits it cleverly only shows the "This is a true story" part. Legally they seem pretty safe on that.
@@conforzo It also says this at the start of the credits (maybe 3-4 slides in) "Based on the play Baby Reindeer written by Richard Gadd"
Even if those people have watched this part, they will claim that they did not. Netflix will not stand out to clarify this, because people will stop searching about this and it's not good for the profit.
Finally someone with a brain. Netflix are in absolutely no way in any legal trouble I have no idea what piers is talking about
Anyone who understands how TV works knows that a script based on a true story is only very loosely based on it at best. The writers take a few plot points based on what actually happened and then fill in the rest of the show with dramatised entertainment. Piers is a journalist though and doesn't seem to understand this.
Piers is going to become “Daddy Reindeer” pretty soon.
😆😳Nyah Ahah!!
Yes, he’s probably in agony now who’s gonna play him!
Fiona: I'm not a stalker.
Piers: So how do you know you are the woman portrayed in the show?
Fiona: Because my name comes up when you Google up "Woman stalks MP" on your iphon.
So it is a true story.
Couldn't make it up! 😅
She doesn't speak how she texts!
She wants a cut of the royalties of the show that’s why 😂
Well, I suppose it was better than hearing Piers asking a guest “Do you condemn Hamas?” for the 15 thousandth time.
tbf if people just answered the question when he asked it 😭
Up to 10 times a sesh.
The fine print at the end says dramatisation and Gad has said she didn’t go to jail.
At the beginning I’d says ‘this is a true story ‘
Many people didn't see that, and only saw the start - BASED ON A TRUE STORY - so in their minds they have already created the bias for the complete series. Just not logical, said Spock.
@@nicholasmeal7446so does Fargo
Fargo isn't based on true events though, such a poor comparison @@mezza711
So perhaps he’s lying about everything else, we have no evidence of anything
Didn't richard confirm in 2019 that she was NOT convicted? Had a restraining order only?
To me, more of a slander would be if she didn't physically assulted Terri. Because from sending messages to attacking people this violent, it takes a type.
Exactly. Having a show that accuses her of so many things, and her saying "wow they lied about me going to jail"... That's not the worse thing you've done in that series lol
@@paulaxa1 There were also many scenes where she is shown sympathetically e.g. she was a damaged child and clung to a furry toy for comfort.
Fiona did not attack the gf in real life. Gadd said in an interview that they had never met.
@@Nat_Ash_A So he made up quite a lot actually. Misleading at best.
@@Nat_Ash_ANo but she sure did use a bunch of email addresses to email constantly to Gadd
"Shock horror" I'm using that. Piers sense of humour & refusal to take himself overly seriously is why he isn't going anywhere. Lorraine & Piers are great together.
Well said.
Probably a British thing to say.
In my opinion (and from having been in a similar situation) she appears to be a strongly dependant Covert Narcissist and Gadd appears to be a co-dependant C-PTSD or BPD sufferer.
The key difference is he is taking measures at atonement, catharsis and growth whereas she is side stepping her past so presents as a potential danger to anyone who interacts with her.
I’m confused because Richard has said in interview, she never went to prison, they added that in to bring a close to it, suitable for screen. In real life he didn’t want to send her to prison as he felt sorry for her
but then it isn't a true story which is claims in pretty much every title of the show that it is.
@@ruthhadfield9726 at the end it says which parts were not true, or fabricated. I feel Netflix would be responsible for not correctly saying “based on a true story” perhaps… I think it is mostly true. Watching that interview, she seems very much as depicted , and looking at her online persona, she posts every two minutes. She could easily send that many emails
@@aimeekovaCrazy thing is if you keep investigating the whole facts and evidence from her tweets to the emails to the letters that gets shown, the more crazy she becomes and the more true the show was
Piers Morgan would interview anyone for ratings he has found his best place on RUclips .
Do you think anyone who does interviews does so for a reason other than ratings?
I mean at least hes honest about it. lol
Baby Reindeer (R Gadd). Older Pony (P Morgan) 😂 Can’t wait for the sequel 😂😂😂
I'm not a fan of Piers but that interview he did was quality. He asked the questions we want to ask but she admits to using 5-6 email addresses and also admits she used different names throughout her life.
If she did go to jail, which Fiona was it that went to jail....was it Fiona Muir, Fiona Muir Harvey or Fiona Harvey....or some other alias....
She did go to jail. She has several charges.
@@PMCFrontLines under which name?
Did you not watch the interview? They said that many journalists have tried to look for any records that show Fiona was convicted. They found nothing at all, not even a court order. If a skilled journalist can’t find it, how would an ordinary person on the internet find it? They even said, the lawyers for Netflix haven’t been able to find any documents.
Additionally, Gadd has admitted that he did not press charges, so he didn’t even talk with the police.
Finally, Fiona’s lawyer has tried to look for evidence too… I’m sure you know what I’m going to say.
Seems that people are so preoccupied with persecution that they wilfully ignore the facts (the real facts, not Gadd‘s version).
I otherwise enjoyed the interview Piers did with Fiona, but I don't understand why they are so stuck on "being convicted" part when Richard himself as publicly stated that she actually wasn't and that was one of the few parts of the show that was fiction.
Because right at the very start it says "Based on a TRUE story" watch it again! can't have it both ways...
It doesn’t. It says “this is a true story” then at the end it tells you some scenes and characters have been fictionalised.
Exactly
@@johngreydanus2033 30 mins 47 secs into the first episode. Press pause, learn to read, read what it says on screen then come back.
@@stevethedweeb3846 also Netflix trailer of the show says This is a Compelling True Story---and at parliament when questioned a
Netflix exec "says" the Martha character is a convicted stalker in real life, but provides no proof--he also says this is a true story.. Now we are suppose to believe that this is a true story only in Gadd's head and all these things happened based on about 5 different characters and that he is messed up on drugs during most of the time that these events happened but no one went to jail and much of the series is fiction and now Fiona wants 1 million pounds-- Please I need help.
He obviously didn’t watch the show coz at the end of credits they said some things had been altered for dramatic purposes
Not everyone watches to the end
Fiona said she never watched the show either. How does she know it's about her and not about another woman?
@@frankjohnston8901She also mentioned when googling "Baby Reindeer real stalker", she comes up
Piers gave a compassionate, balanced interview with Fiona and asked all the right questions.
U mean Lorraine?.
@@DreSttarr-yi7lz no, I'm pretty sure that he meant Fiona tbf
@@DreSttarr-yi7lz No, when he interviewed Fiona
He is victim blaming by saying "he is himself unwell"
Agreed 💯
The telling thing for me was after she watched the clip about 'Martha ' in the final scenes and Piers said how much the actress looked like her and Fiona responded " oh that's not very flattering is it" so Fiona thinks that she is much more attractive than the actress who plays Martha which is starkly not true . This is a sign of her narcissistic tendencies IMO
Blimey. Just her opinion. Fiona was quite attractive 12 years ago, and certainly not morbidly obese.
@@Globaldave1970 well we aren't talking about 12 years ago...she thinks she is more attractive than Jessica and everyone but her can see that's not true...now
@@user-xh4gw1hr4b LOL, in the series, when Fiona was only 46. Seen her pics and I agree. Beauty is in the eye of beholder.
@@Globaldave1970 ...all I'm saying is a narcissist has a distorted view of themselves...they are always smarter,more attractive and in every way better than everyone else.
@@user-xh4gw1hr4b LOL. Who says she is a narcissist?
not to sound weird but i’m hooked on this story, watched the show and interviews and i still find myself looking at comments off everyone seeing what everyone else thinks
OCD...it gets us all 🙂
I wanted Piers to ask Lorraine if she thinks Fiona Harvey looks like her because Fiona was so adamant that she looks like Lorraine and the actress portraying her in baby reindeer.
Why has nobody told Piers that there’s a statement at the end of every episode that says: “This program is based on real events: however certain characters, names, incidents, locations and dialogue have been fictionalised for dramatic purposes.”
He’s pretty caught up on “this is a true story” but Netflix have already stated the story has been exaggerated.
so his interview revealed everything we alredy knew from the show. Good reporting, piers
Why are people so gullible?! Baby Reindeer is not a true story. It’s a drama based on a stage show written by a guy who, by profession, is an attention seeker.
It is HIS VERSION of the truth. Fiona has HER VERSION of the truth. The actual truth will always be somewhere in between - and if the show was made to the actual truth it would have been a boring watch and no-one would be talking about it.
In his interview he said she wasn't in prison
Yet the producers of Netflix swore under oath in the house of Parliament that she was a convicted stalker. Obviously, they will take a sworn oath over a tv interview.
@@Nat_Ash_AEveryone can swear under oath nowadays, doesn't change the fact she's a stalker
@@kiwifrizzle2725 I don’t doubt that she did stalk to some degree, however the show depicted that she did a lot more than stalking. The facts of the show is what is in question.
@@Nat_Ash_A They said she was a convicted stalker, they didnt say she was convicted of stalking Richard. She stalked and harassed other people before she even met Richard. Richard already stated that she didnt go to prison for stalking him.
@@trnigyul fgs, have you been listening to any of the discussions? There is no evidence of any convictions or court appearances. Not to say that she didn’t stalk anyone, if she did, there is no evidence. Everyone seems to be able to create a Netflix series or run to the papers, but none of these people decided to prosecute… even with alleged proof, no one has yet to provide such evidence.
The bottom line, Richard Gadd would not be rich and famous without her.
It’s all part of the show! Actors upon actors, claims and counter claims, making lots of people to dig into people’s background and become mini stalkers themselves. Something will reveal itself at the Edinburgh festival probably
Imagine if this was a male Stalker. You think they'd be getting all this air time and positive slant? If think not
This is just making Stalking seem OK, or even appealing. It's OK as long as it's a bloke being stalked
I don't think that's true. If he wasn't a convicted stalker and a show made him out to be that's a huge difference. She is crazy, but she has a point.
so don't you think that people have a right to reply if an allegation is made?
He literally never said she was convicted though... he ended the show as he wished things happened and has stated this multiple times. Imagine going on a TV show saying "he said this" when he never!
Netflix exec "says" the Martha character is a convicted stalker in real life, but provides NO PROOF
So Gadd promotes the show as a true story, even though he embellished parts of it. Then says that it’s not all true only in interviews…. Is everyone that watched the show, expected to follow his interviews to know what parts are fictionalised? How many people do you think that watched his interview compared to how many watched the show?
One more thing…. If Gadd made it clear that Martha was not convicted irl, why is it that majority of people online believe that she was convicted?
@@Nat_Ash_AIf you watched the show, you'd understand what was dramatized and what was true
That would be one to watch, "the Dream Team reunited." 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Good to see Piers back on ITV ❤
u spelt pig wrong
@@averyintelligenceperfect
God no
Aha look
...with chips.
I actually think Piers Morgan is a great interviewer
When he's not interrupting the answer every other word.
@@rickd438better than one of his latest panelists.. what a nightmare
@@HolyFreakinDragonSlayer i think i know exactly who you mean, the lady next to piers who literally over talked a panel of 4 men including piers which i didn't think was possible, he does get me mad when he speaks over people and doesn't give them a chance to have their say. What's the point in that it becomes a one way conversation all about piers 🙄
How did you come close to that ?? He doesn’t let anybody speak
Absolutely agree. That was craftsmanship.
She could have her "Martha's Story" rival series. That would be fun.
No she'd lie
@PMCFrontLines that's the best bit. Totally fantasy and like an LCD trip while she has a diet coke.
I'd watch it. LOL.
Welcome back to itv Piers 👍
I googled the UK laws on judicial privacy. Apparently your record is private unless you apply for a job and specifically give potential employer permission. She is aware of this.
As much as I don't like Piers Morgan's politics, he is a very good interviewer so to have Piers and Lorraine interviewing Richard Gadd would be good watching I think.
If that happens Lorraine won't get to say much.
At the end of the series on Netflix it clearly says, not everything is true and some of it is based on fiction, not in those words, but similar.
And at the start it says ‘THIS IS A TRUE STORY’. Next…
no it dosent
You just loud and wrong
@@FormOverFlair No it doesn't
It’s been marketed as a true story. Even the head of Netflix swore on oath that it was a true story.
Stop spinning nonsense.
Great interview
Ok you gotta give it to Piers. He goes where other people are too afraid to go. Give him an award
This whole story intrigues me.
She's sitting at home saying, "I didn't say but 10 words to that lad, Piers. We've barely met."
Love them 2 together 😊
IMO morally Netflix should pay her a huge sum of money. They have made a huge amount of money from her story without her permission.
Has Richard Gadd said to anyone whether or not she is the real Martha? is his silence telling us that yes it is her? surely if its not her then he should come forward with some sort of statement?
I think it confirms it. He would probably very adamently discourage people from going after her if it wasn't her. But since it probably her, he can't really engage.
Of course it is.
I can see a series 2 coming with Piers in it as next victim 😂
I'd definitely watch that!
What Piers doesnt seem to understand is it isnt slander because neither Richard Gadd nor the show said that FIONA HARVEY herself did any of these things. There is no direct accusation, so legally it cant be slander
Cut to the daily record with lorraines' bafta pic ... and the real Martha interview lol. How funny she said shes Lorraine's double 🤣
Shes insane
Are you qualified to give that diagnosis
@Ayat78 you don't need to be, you can see it, everything she's being accused of by two people
@@Ayat78 Its not mental health, some people are just programmed this way in life, she believes in her way of thinking, and she hasn't done anything wrong. We throw around Mental health issues too easy these days. Makes you wonder how Humans have managed to survive this long.
@@Ayat78 Fiona? is that you?
* She's *.
Piers has made a friend for life.
They don’t want to motivate people to tell lies by offering a lot of money to be on shows. The rate he paid was standard.
I was arrested, charged , found guilty and imprisoned in a false name -it is more than possible to conceal a conviction.
I thought Piers threaded very caredully. Well done.
Correction: she was revealed by the PUBLIC and SHE went to the media who are now exploiting her.
Piers Morgan, you just opened a can of worms 😂 good job being "brave" 😂😂😂
Piers Morgan and Fiona Harvey deserve each other.
I want to see what she does with £1m please give it to her 😂
I mean she's doing nightclub appearances now ,😂
@@elelonger4409tell me you're joking...
The highest grade tracking devices you could ever imagine.
She will create a series where she is being stalked
She needs a new phone
This man does not know 'Duty of Care', and it's laughable that he says this as though he has any integrity.
lol so true
And he said she wasn’t harassing him 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Piers is an antagonist on almost every issue I ever knew about. Every single body language expert I trust has agreed with my take. She is a liar through and through. I'm sure that some things are not perfect with the series. As far as the convicted stocker? I wonder if she had the conviction overturned for some other reason after the initial conviction.
the part where he asked her "were you ever in love with him" and she saiid "yes" was edited - she actually denied that.
She was obviously fascinated by him, if not in love with him. He was likely the only man who ever showed her some affection and didn't judge her body size.
It’s absolutely right she gets her say. Whether it comes out she’s guilty or not is another matter. If you’re someone who can’t even open their mind to the possibility that Netflix or Richard Gadd could lie about any of this then you’re extremely naive. Mental how many people take the internet/tv as the gospel truth.
Notice how she keeps breaking eye contact when answering questions 😂
Love you Lorraine!
If you can’t show the clips of the show without blurring them, why show them at all?
Everyone forgets he hacked into a murderd girls phone but holds the high ground.
Yep !
Was that him? !!!!
@@tonimedlen5371 yep
The late Diana princess of Wales. Everyone forgets about how he treated her.
What? He's already said that she wasn't taken to court or convincted.
I didn’t realise Lorraine decided to pop into work this morn
Exactly what Martha would say in BRD if there were just 3 more episodes, going on an interview and blaming Donny for everything that happened
It says in the end credits at the end of the episodes that the story is true but some bits have been fictionalised with name changes, etc.
Only a stalker would tell the victim to leave them alone 😂
Fiona Harvey was 100% convicted Netflix have an army of lawyers and they would have done their diligence belts and braces.
She is behaving exactly as depicted in the tv series
Piers needs to look right at end of the series credits. A disclaimer states the program is based on real events, however certain characters, names, incidents, locations and dialogue have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes. So some parts are true and others created. Which ones we don't know???
Where’s the full interview
But she has stalked before 😮
If she said she didn't know where he lived when Piers asked her if she ever went to his home she said "no, I don't know where he lived" But she mailed him a letter. Am I wrong didn't she say that she sent him 1 letter?
She said she sent it to the theatre where his play was being shown..it was on in London- as well as him previously having a show at the Edinburgh festival.
@@sheilamcintosh5835 oh ok I missed that thanks
THE ENDING CREDITS DO SAY....
BASED ON TRUE EVENTS,
However, certain characters, names, incidents, locations and dialog have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes.
The part of a show which most people don't watch?
@British_Rogue right. I didnt see it at 1st. But,its there. She cant sue.
@@michellejohnson3491 The opening is, _"This is a true story."_
She might have grounds to sue based on that alone.
Could be a gray area for sure. Guess we'll have to see.
Why is no one stating that at the end of each netflix episode there is the legal disclaimer about certain people, events etc are dramatised. This blows any argument that piers or anyone else out of the water when they keep stating it is a true story.
Piers has interviewed so many people and some of them have been really scary people but this lady just seemed a little lost, she didn’t come across scary.
Obsessive behaviour won‘t necessarily appear scarey on the surface, but over time, it can be extremely wearing for the person on the receiving end. And if it seems it will never end, that would feel extremely threatening.
Oooh she did though! She is utterly fascinating.
Jekyll and Hyde personality, I believe she is very scary
I'm not a fan of Piers Morgan, but in this particular case he is not only right, he is amongst the very few that have approached this story in a very nuanced and intellectually honenst way. Well, done Pierse, there's hope for you after all.
PIERS PAID THE WOMAN 250 pounds for her interview n he’s MAKING AT LEAST 50k from it.. who’s more concerned for who!?
He's made way more than that. Probably close to £1m with the countless more shows following it and advertising, youtube views etc
@@ThomasJoe.. and what's the issue?
SHE WAS HAPPY TO DO THE INTERVIEW AND TAKE THE MONEY AT THE TIME 😅😅
To be fair, a lot of shows have people appear for free. £250 isn't particularly unusual. I don't think you can agree to that and retroactively ask for more because the interview became popular.
@@Lauren_3000 Bingo!
How did I know this was going to happen
Piers looks lovely here
Sent from my iPohne
I honestly thought Piers Morgan was dead until all this Fiona stuff! 😅😅😅 In america he’s been gone for years.
he's only involved with gutter talk here
So ...that means someone is dead, irrelevancey = death
...is that how you see the world?!
Blimey ...sort yourself out.
@@lilme7052 😂
please take him back, I implore you
@@lauraj8429 no thanks 😂
Right, brilliant idea! Let’s reunite the stalker with her victim!
That would be a phenomenal idea so that the stalker can once again stalk her victim
Is it a true story? No and the disclaimer at the end of the show says so. As did the writers. So his claim about prison time is irrelavant. As the writers have said, the whole point of changing the story was to help hide her identity. Its down to her she went public and hadnt deleted her social media. Also its on record she was in trouble with the law for stalking (Is it a true story? No and the disclaimer at the end of the show says so. As did the writers. So his claim about prison time is irrelavant. As others have said, the whole point of changing the story was to help hide her identity. Its down to her she went public and hadnt deleted her social media. Also its on record she was in trouble with the law for stalking and an injunction apparently served. Piers is simply trying to squeeze every penny out this story he can. Peiers is simply trying to squeeze every penny out this story he can.
The issue is no one reads the end credits. Everyone reads the start and that stated "This is a true story" ask anyone in the street and they will all say they think it's a true story and every aspect of it .
No, he's not. He gave her an opportunity to air her side, which turned into a car crash for her. She is now asking for one million from him...
This!! 💯
@@jewelssunsun9450 She's asking for a £1m as she got paid £250 for the interview. And now its done so well. What she needed was an agent to get £500-£1m appearance fee which she might have got.
which episode/ where can i find the disclaimer that it isn't true?
I think although the point of changing the story was to help her hide her identity, they definitely could've done a better job - because she was found almost instantly.
I think saying "its down to her she went public and hadn't deleted her social media" is quite unfair. Netflix made a programme which portrayed her negatively, and resulted in her getting death threats, harrassed et. She was basically already public by this point - the similarities made were just too strong and were not done well enough to hide her identity. Therefore she felt pressured to go public explain her side of the story and say that a lot of the things said were untrue. Is it not unfair that netflix did a series that has caused her to go through these a lot of grievance without any dialogue/consultation with her? They wrote a story about her, potentially exaggerated her actions to the point that they are seen as a terrible person, and then said " i'm not going to take any accountability that you are now receiving death threats and have to go AWOL on social media". Come on, they are somewhat the cause of her grievance.
i understand that she 100% could've done everythign said in the series, but if there's even a chance that she didn't do all those things that's defamation. i understand that part of her actions have caused her to go through this, but also netflix has exacerbated the repercussions.
I think piers wants to squeeze the money, but i think it was good he gave her a platform on which to express her story.
When someone has a drug addiction and a woman/man is calling /texting constantly, what do you expect...they will use poor judgment and give in.
Why does this woman remind of that woman on EastEnders that was in love with George Michael
Heather 😂😂😂😂
@@Hannah.hkp6 yes lol 😆
best thing about heather trotter is the woman who plays her is even more hilarious in real life
@@averyintelligence correct, Cheryl Fergison is proper funny!
Can’t unsee it now
And the plot thickens 😂
Run Piers. Get on the witness protection programme!?! Change your name everything lol
LOL, well we never guessed that would happen
It does say it's dramatised.
There are so many movies & tv shows that say its a true story when it isnt. Remember Blaire Witch Project?
And Fargo 🤷♀️
People may joke but stalking is very serious..if the shoe was on the other foot and the stalker was male people wouldn’t be joking about it
Why show pictures with the whole thing faded over. BEYOND RIDICULOUS!
the goat