"Critical Drinker doesn’t understand movies, not even a little bit."...this is not just out and out wrong but this has to be one of the most insane things I have ever read.
I have read far more insane, but at the same time, he is the same coward who said 2023 DID NOT have many great movies... Tells you a lot about his understanding of cinema.
@@Lithosagymfan173 If I’m not mistaken he recommended a few 2023 releases. So he contradicted himself yet again. Oh he likely missed the point of these movies because Godzilla Minus One has a message that is how you say “woke”.
@RazorRex Woke doesn’t even mean anything, it’s just whatever grifters like this don’t like. Dune 2? Oh that’s not woke, a movie about space arabs fighting for their land against white colonialists? Nah, that’s great. Not ‘woke’ at all. (Black person gets cast as the little mermaid): WOkkkEeRErrKkRerR
@@lukedoyle2770 I’m honestly surprised he recommend Blue Eye Samurai when if anything he should hate it because besides the feminist themes and the only white man is the villain. He must only like it because of the naked women.
Completely different. Dads being a little bit useless at 'normal' things, whilst being hyper-competent in other areas is a reflection of Life. Source: Am a Dad. This works in a sitcom because there is something of everyday life that is funny about it - everyone can laugh at Homer being incompetent - because the writers don't hate Homer. Homer is actually a good dad in many respects. He provides for his family and makes an effort - not always successfully, but that never stops him.
@@pathogeneration5138 Show me a Dad who doesn't identify with elements of Homer's character. The jokes are funny and work because there is an element of truth to them.
@MajesticDemonLord The problem isn't that Homer exists. Homer is hilarious. It's that portraying men, all through media, as the inept, sorry, wrong and corrected butt of the joke, was beyond a joke, decades and hundreds of monotonous examples ago. There's been a glimpse of reprieve recently. But it's still a hateful, brain aborted wasteland out there. Homer is one stereotype among dozens being worked in THE SIMPSONS.
Refutes "how men are portrayed" by showing "Fall Guy" which portrays a man as a spineless (ha! pun), weak, emotional punching bag for a good portion of the movie whose entire purpose in life is to get some sort of validation from a woman that the movie *TELLS US* he broke up with/ghosted instead of showing us how it happened, all so that anyone watching the movie will fill in the blanks with their own story. Which alienates half the goddam audience which is probably why the movie didn't do so well. I mean, if we are going to nit-pick some dude on the internet, nit-picking is on the table. Fall Guy was as "beta orbiter" as you can get for half the movie. Also "temporarily unavailable" lol cmon man.
Somehing i Noticed about CD is: He'll Critique, Works that He Likes (Albeit with some "Debatable" Ponts) But He Won't Do The Same, for works that he Doesn't Like Which I think, Diminishes his Validity/Authenticity as a Reviewer
It's a parasitic creator. He gets views, he makes money, gets comments, which YT also values, even if by fractions of a cent, etc. It doesn't matter if his videos get ratio'ed to hell, it still makes a little bit of cash. There're plenty of these. Fortunately, you can always go back to the page where you clicked on this, then use the three-dot button: "Do not recommend channel". That does end up making them disappear for good.
Critical Drinker is tough but fair..if he says a movie is worth watching, I will watch it. His judgement has never let me down and he doesn’t trash movies without explaining his reasoning. If CD warns a movie is dire…it is, and you waste your box office money at your peril.
@@williamchamberlain2263 They're also symptoms of CHARACTER, and the spine of western civilization that is "aka" the Pillars. I promise you, and test this thesis at will: The future of liberties that is the lap of luxury you inhabit, will not be preserved by simpering weebs with cat ears, and furries in touch with their feels.
@@lukedoyle2770 It was just a movie that glorifies shock and trauma, good movie, sure but not anything worthwhile or original...maybe even harmful to your mental health
Well, I don't see that the premise was presented in a way that can be easily proved or disproved. This video at least presents a number of *iconic* scenes that go against what Critical Drinker is calling for, so it at least demonstrates the benefits of having space for a wide variety of different portrayals of "masculinity".
@@williambarton5681 Drinkers point is that a large number of big-budget movies were absolute flops because of a certain pernicious ideology. In an attempt to disprove this claim, the Poster points to a number of mid-range budget movies (Okay, Top gun was Big-Budget...) that *did not* adhere to said ideology and (as a result) were wildly successful. This is not the refutation that you think it is.
@@MajesticDemonLord Wee Willy's only point is to make insecure, stupid teenage boys (and grown men with the emotional maturity of teenage boys) angry about nothing, because it's a relatively easy way to exploit RUclips's algorithm and get rich.
he said Peter Parker is written/potrayed as a failure and miserable in Across The Spider Verse is because Peter Parker is a white man. That was when I had enough of him. Totally neglecting the dynamic and internal struggle of Peter trying to protect Miles and in the same time being his mentor.
1. You seem to think its impossible for male writers or director to make a movie that depicts men as dumb or bad 2. He's talking about a general direction. Of course there are exceptions. You finding 2-3 scenes that dont align dont disprove the general assessment. 3. Interestingly when he talked about advertisements you dont use your usual argumentof just finding one contradictory clip: Was it that hard to find a good counterexample or did you notice the flaw in your logic? You seem to intentionally misunderstand his ideas and try to refute extreme versions of them (He said that a few decades ago men were less emotional on screen -> "he must think men previously never cried on screen, here is a clip to disprove that"). In the end its just about politics: You're probably left so you like the development in Hollywood or your desired end point is still so far away from reality that you find the changes between then and now inconsequential so you dont understand why anyone could complain. You are using the same 'gaslighting'-argument leftists often use when people are talking about the societal shift to the left (in my country at least) and act like things have always been this way.
@@harrystyles7466 the reason they keep making feminist movies is not because they’re leftists but because they make money, same happens often with gay characters. Hollywood is not run by leftists, but the people running Hollywood are using pink and rainbow capitalism to gain money. They do not hate men, most of these movies and most of the important roles are still assigned to men, they just want money, and if being from any minority became ilegal they would make movies about rarely defying the status quo cause they just want money
"Male characters are bad when they show emotions and talk about how they feel!" You mean male characters who... act like complex people? Does he want to watch a film full of flat stereotypes?
Well, you got off to a bad start by implying the Drinker is wrong to say many women are creatives in Hollywood because you show the top grossing movies are written & directed by men. So doesn't that tell you that all the projects women are in charge of--and there are MANY--are NOT high grossers? Most, in fact, are pretty spectacular failures. Like The Acolyte, Indy 5, She-Hulk, The Marvels, Obi-Wan Kenobi, The Eternals...and that's just at Disney! In the last 3 years!
Pretty disengenous. First off, all of the shows you mentioned have done great viewing wise, like immensly well(Except maybe She-Hulk, but it did fine numbers). Secondly "The Marvels failed at the box office!" Yed, during a writer/actor strike so was barely promoted, and that movie needed two Disney+ shows to be understood, which most people don't care enough to. But then what happened? The movie blew up on Disney+ and was the most watched once it aired there, almost as if Disney are trying to kill theaters and just do everything through streaming... not even a tinfoil hat thing, it's very apparent.😊
@@Lithosagymfan173 no shit Sherlock. Who would have thought an Obi Wan series would have had a lot of ppl watching it, not like Star Wars fans have been waiting for it for decades. Then comes the acolyte, which is the least viewed star wars show, because: 1) nobody cared to watch it in the first place 2) it's a bunch of crap 3) after the quality of obi wan series everyon got a good understanding of what's disney been cooking. Exactly the same arguments go for Indiana Jones. Now imagine calling someone's comment disingenuous while arguing these dog water of series/movies got the views they did thanks to anything else but fans/consumers love for franchises they ruined.
@@nickandreyev766 1) Many people cared, Critical Drinker himself where he reviewed every episode. Also it 488million for its two first episodes, higher than everything else other than Kenobi. The views were apparently delining as the series went but so does every series(Except maybe Breaking Bad), and I can't find actual viewership number from a trusted source 2) That's an opinion 3) I don't know, Obi-Wan got fine ratings, 3.5, to 70%, to 82, to 73 just from top pages. Most people found the show alright enough Also, it has been proven The Acolyte has been review bombed to hell, to the point Acolytes a 2008 film is getting review bombed now with comments like "You ruined Star Wars!" Even Geeks+Gamers made a tweet how happy they're review bombing it. Also, it's also as if not everyone is chronically online(Like me, frfr) and usually doesn't care about what drama is going on, most people saw The Acolyte, were like "Sure, why not?" and then either continued or stopped. Also, by your own logic, Critical Drinker and his gang of racists are consumers since they watched the show weekly, i:e gave Disney more money, to "make more trash."
@@Lithosagymfan173 so the fact that you googled the 488m figure and provided it as an argument, but didn't scroll the page down to see that it is actually the worst result of all their products (except for Andor, which is pretty much non existent in the media sphere, but an ok series) speaks for itself. And who actually would have thought that a content creator, who's job it is to review stuff, will be watching it. Also how can you call the acolyte being crap an "opinion", but then refer to Obi Wan rating (which is higher anyway) in the same sentence. You say "most" people think the acolyte is whatever. Who exactly are these people? From what I gather (after investing about 2 minutes into researching), it's got low viewer scores basically everywhere. Now I could assume that it's some kind of neckbeard conspiracy to gather together and ruin the ratings of this misunderstood masterpiece so that nobody will ever find this hidden gem. Or I could just take it for what it is. I don't know anything about review bombing the acolyte, and neither do I care, if people find it fun and worth their time, then so be it. I also don't know anything about anyone's racist friends, and, again, I don't particularly care, because I assume your and mine definitions of racism would be vastly different. I just stopped by to point out the obvious fact that the number of views of these at most mediocre shows/movies has nothing to do with their actual quality, but everything to do with fanbase expectations/hype.
@@nickandreyev766 As I said, large showing at first and started declining as the series went, most things goes this way. There was a show called Ultraman Blazar, amazing first few episodez showing and then the next few episodes could not resch half the views of the first 3 or 4 episodes. Also, I saw charts, it was the best of their products after Obi-Wan, if anything Boba Fett or Andor are usually the worst viewership wise. The Acolyte got review bombed, that's a fact, that's why it has 'lower' scores everywhere. It's not even a conspiracy, the thing got more ratings that all Mandalorian seasons combined, more than The Batman, a movie that made a billion, we even saw reviews coming minutes after episodes released, how much? 5 minutes, meaning before anyone could watch the episode and give am actual opinion. By "most" people, I mean normies, usually just casual fans or ones that were somewhat intrigued by the trailer hearing all the buzz around, whether negative or positive. Finally, Drinker is quite racist, comparing Kong to slave trades(Yes) and his buddy Nerdrotic loves making racist jokes like calling Mexican Tacos(And calling Hispanics Mexicans, cause "they all look alike.") or the terribld Native jokes he made about Echo(Like "closing the reserves."). We also have Ryan Kinel, a guy who gets angry when a black guy is on screen and conpared George Floyd to a dead bear as a "joke." Oh, did I forget how he keeps spreading the "white male is being replaced" and "white men are always evil when they shouldn't," both falling under Great Replacement Theory, which by the way, is racist(Go ask the Chinese, they sure loved livinv during that time).
He definitely understands them enough to be successful... (but goodluck on trying to build a career off of hate, that always works out really well for people)
Yeah no. The Critical Stinker is only successful by pandering to the lowest demographic- he’s the Butt Rock equal to RUclips critics. Also: “build a career out of hate”? Last I checked The Critical Stinker is the one saying bigoted things.
@@RazorRexEven if he isn't a bigot(Hs is), he made a few videos outright hating on Brie Larson and mocking her, not the characters she plays, the actress herself, for like maybe being cringe. How many videos has he done on Russel Brand or Weinstein though?
@@Lithosagymfan173 So what? Can someone not like cheese larson? Or should we all bow to the woke unimind? And btw, cheese is a no good "actor" with the same emotional range of a bag of rocks, a face that looks like an old crt tv set (makes me wonder where she keeps the remote), and has the mental capacity of a disabled 12 years old (aka feminist).
@@RazorRex that means nothing here. I could say "I watched 50 films and 47 had female leads". Those 5 years are really important here, bc Within 5 years we had a dramatic shift in the industry.
@@merlin5662 What I’m getting at is that you people claim that “Hollywood hates men” and that “women are taking over. Yet you have nothing to back it up seeing that again the film industry is still male dominated both and behind the camera.
Are you serious? You've taken isolated examples that conflict with the drinker's critiques of modern movies and suggested that he's therefore wrong? Of course there are outliers, you geniuses. Anyone with a brain knows that. His overall point about the direction that men's and women's roles and skills within movies are heading is true. Finding outliers doesn't negate the narrative.
@@TheShepdawg9 If you actually paid attention you’d realize Critical Stinker got things wrong and is a hypocrite. Big Trouble In Little China is one of his favorite movies YET as the video pointed out the protagonist is an idiot and has to be saved by a minority character and Martin Riggs is not “stoic”.
Also, ‘more than 10 or 15 years old’. I guarantee the dude hasn’t seen a film that came out before Jaws. Men with feelings were ALWAYS there, just look at Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans. 1927 ffs. I also hate the constant cliche retort of strong female characters ‘critics’ like him use being Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connor. Maybe watch Erin Brockovich? Little Women? The Passion of Joan of Arc? ‘Strong’ doesn’t just mean being in an action movie.
"I guarantee the dude hasn’t seen a film that came out before Jaws." He recommended Twelve Angry Men, which came out almost two decades before Jaws. So your guarantee is worthless.
@@williamchamberlain2263 So I prove your "guarantee" wrong, and instead of admitting that you were talking out of your arse, you double down and claim, without evidence, that the CD is a hypocrite. What is hypocritical about him recommending an old film with emotion in it? It seems to fit with his dislike of emotionless Mary Sues. And it isn't even the only emotion-filled pre-Jaws film he's recommended. There's It's a Wonderful Life too. I suspect he likes emotions in films. I don't get all the hate against him. He points out the good and bad in films, whether he likes the film overall or not. I think that's to his credit.
@georgebailey8179 When i’m wrong, i’m wrong. Fair play calling me out there. I just remembered too he’s also mentioned 60s Bond flicks and The Godfather. 12 Angry Men is a total banger, but he still seems pretty set in a certain box. The classics he recommends are already highly regarded, we don’t actually gain recommendations from watching his channel. I mean shit, most can be found on IMDB’s top 250. I maintain he’s about outrage, and doesn’t give a flick about introducing people to good ones. PS cool name btw, Wonderful Life fkn rules ❤️
2:05 he told u the problem, too many men character are shown dumb incompetent & needed saving by a diverse character. Of course we can like one or two character like that but having too many of them is a problem. Isn't it ? Whenever some awesome male characters are brought to screen he praises them as well. Why did u exclude that? As ur title suggests u r making a vid on his entire personality & not just this one vid he made. Did u even watch anything else from him ? U didn't finish ur research
did you notice that to make a counter point to what the drinker claimed they used a bunch of clips from shows and movies that have strong male leads but left out the fact that every single clip used is from something that the drinker has recommended. This is someone with 200 subs and 11 videos making unsubstantiated claims about someone with over 2 million subs and hundreds of videos. Clout chasing and trying to punch up to build a channel which seems to be based around just saying that popular creators are wrong by making videos which make wild claims and then provide no proof or create misrepresentations to fit a narrative to stir up garbage. Either they are just really bad at doing research and making valid points or they are just really immature and don't know how.
Daniel Craig’s Bond is easily the best, because he’s relatable. I’d wager a year’s wages that the ‘drinker’ isn’t the stoic man that Connery was, and actually does have feelings like y’know, a fkn human? He’s not a film critic, he’e a culture warrior. Simple as that.
@@lukedoyle2770 "Relatable" is the most tiresome insistence of insecure and unimaginative audiences and writers. It's just an admission that Craig's Bond is 'less' Bond. Bond is Bond BECAUSE he's a Swiss Army Human. BECAUSE he occupies a practically mythological iteration of action hero.
But the classic ‘Bond’ has no depth whatsoever. Don’t get me wrong ‘Goldfinger’ is a great watch but it’s total surface. If you think the writing in something like Casino Royale is lazy I really got no response tbh, to each their own i guess
@@lukedoyle2770 A change to form is a change. Some addition is a form of subtraction. Knowing the backstory of THE CROW makes him more engaging. Not knowing the backstory of THE JOKER in Dark Knight makes him menacing. Casino Royale is an excellent film, but it's more Borne than Bond. When you ground it in that sort of grit and wet emotion, Bond loses its mythical charm.
That’s a solid argument mate. But it’s not like Craig’s Bond is the first time he was humanised either. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service had his humanism nailed at the ending. My point was more that the Drinker is totally full of crap
@@lukedoyle2770 You could relate this to the Star Wars controversy. And why people are so pissed off and hurt about the gross mishandling of Luke Skywalker. Sure, in reality, humans can fall and fail, and shift and change. But this isn't a gritty cinema verite. It's mythic fairytale. You can allow Luke to grow. But the change must be earned, must make sense, and must serve a mythic purpose. Otherwise you don't grasp the substance of what the mythic fantasy is. Nobody who loves Luke Skywalker wants to see him like this. And that's not a good subversive reason to do it.
A few years ago there was this guy - the Lazy Critic - who would critize films he admitedly didn't see, based on trailers and hearsay. He was, of course, right almost every time.
look up the concept 'the exception does not disprove the rule' that might help you out, because sure you can find examples but a few examples do not make a trend, that what Drinker is getting at.
one of them(book) has an upcoming movie, he only uploaded a trailer, he and his friends dont even talk about it, they didnt even react to the trailer on their channels, the trailer also shows a whamen taking down a guy twice her size, lol
@@RazorRex Freud was a Czech physician who developed a pseudoscientific (or protoscientific?) approach to study the human psyche that's considered a precursor to modern psychology (as alchemy to chemistry, astrology to astronomy etc.) and it largely revolved around the concept of a dichotomy between the conscious and the unconscious selves, with the latter housing one's true desires and repressed beliefs, moreover posing that these repressed aspects of one's persona could bubble up to the surface and manifest themselves in different manners. So, essentially, in Freudian theory a given expression of one's persona which is fundamentally at odds with their alleged beliefs could be interpreted as a reflexion of their own repressed beliefs and desires. Nowadays Freud's work subsists in the popular imagination mostly through cynical references to the concept of a "Freudian slip", as well as to his unconventional incest-related musings.
@@timothymaroney4497 He does so by pandering to idiots and only telling them what they want to hear. Also “Uncritical Grifter” that’s a good one. I call him “Critical Stinker”.
Kinda funny trying to argue against the Drinker's point while Disney Is still making films and shows. Plus the first minute or so of the video proved his point: people like well written characters, men who act like men do and woman who act like women do, reacher is a good example of a well written story with well written characters. Also putting some clips of the drinker out of context and spamming some other random clips from films/shows out of context isn't an actual argument, the only thing i got out of this video is probably ADHD. With this being said, i don't agree with everything the drinker says but you can check by yourself that most of the times the film or show which he doesn't like and give a low score, actually have a low score on rotten tomatoes.
@@RazorRex He is not a God, he Is a human like us, he can do errors too some times and as I said i do not agree with all he says. I've watched terminal list and It wasn't that bad (btw i found It on Amazon, i didn't watched any review Just saw Chris Pratt and gave it a try). The show story was kinda simple compared to Reacher but still managed to give some good action scenes, plus the brain damage thing was probably the better part to me.
@@sterminino “He is a human like us” except he’s literally the 1%. He makes tons of money whining about movies and shows being progressive and minorities.
@@RazorRex most of the times drinker calls out a film/show not because there are strong females or minorities, but because the story is shite, the acting is shite etc. long story short he reviews badly films which are made for spreading political views and stuff instead of entertaining. There Is nothing progressive in putting more minorities or more women in film, its quite the opposite considering what happened to Disney Marvel and Disney star wars (my eyes still burn).
And not a single counter-argument was actually made lmao. No, I get it, you want us to imagine the argument your're making based on flashes of statistics and clips from films. Great way to leave plenty of room for yourself to shift the goalposts. This is just baiting people into making an argument for you, but you haven't actually said anything yourself. Go away now.
@@pathogeneration5138 And then he should watch his video about "Game Industry" and he will see that Drinker pretends to know everything. Also his "drunk scotish guy" gimic is already boring
@@thehedgehognerd Probably nothing good huh. Taxi Driver is completely in the wheelhouse of what CD would praise. Being that it's, you know, beyond competently made? By a living legend of film? You think he understands nought. Eh what is more certain is you don't understand him.
Except that's not even true of the examples given here. As much as CD might lean more towards masculine archetypes than me, that's a reductive take. He's outlining an assortment of qualities. And the way hardly anyone's actually 'cool' anymore. The selective citation of characters emoting hard, doesn't belie that. They're still to be found however. Kaluuya may 'Nope' out in parts, of Nope, but he's a quintessential case study in stoic cool. CD is speaking to the aggregate of characterisation, and he's not wrong.
@@M_k-zi3tnProbably only because the woman in that show made his tiny insecure dong hard. Also if anything, he should hate those shows. Arcane had LGBT characters and Blue Eye Samurai has an Asian cast with the only villain being a white man.
@@M_k-zi3tnHe probably only likes those shows because of the attractive women and if anything he should hate them. Arcane has LGBT characters and Blue Eye Samurai has an Asian cast with the villain being the only white man.
"Literal who youtuber desperately trying to get relevancy off the clout of others" Yes, that perfectly summarises the manchild tantrum channels like "critical drinker" etc. They gain "relevancy" with chuds by telling them what they already believe about female creative professionals and "fah-munazm."
Drinker: Men need to be tougher and more stoic, and take what they are given without being emotional Also Drinker: *moans, whines, and wets his pants cause a woman was on screen for .0821 seconds longer than a man*
That sounds like Critical Drinker's "I'm something of a sigma male myself" manifesto. TLDR for the pro-stoicism dilettantes; being emotionally reserved is also a result of trauma and PTSD, which a lot of guys used to have from military service, abusive parents, neglectful or alcoholic parents, severely strict schooling, or losing friends to dangerous jobs unsafe cars and alcohol.
I live in Edinburgh, Scotland, which is south of Fife, where he apparently lives. I honestly look forward to the day I recognise him in the street, I would definitely tell him what I think of him.
Critical Drinker fans are such sorry simps
@@esbenm6544 And the drones that like anything and everything the studios pump out aren’t?
"Critical Drinker doesn’t understand movies, not even a little bit."...this is not just out and out wrong but this has to be one of the most insane things I have ever read.
I have read far more insane, but at the same time, he is the same coward who said 2023 DID NOT have many great movies... Tells you a lot about his understanding of cinema.
@@Lithosagymfan173 If I’m not mistaken he recommended a few 2023 releases. So he contradicted himself yet again. Oh he likely missed the point of these movies because Godzilla Minus One has a message that is how you say “woke”.
@RazorRex
Woke doesn’t even mean anything, it’s just whatever grifters like this don’t like.
Dune 2? Oh that’s not woke, a movie about space arabs fighting for their land against white colonialists? Nah, that’s great. Not ‘woke’ at all.
(Black person gets cast as the little mermaid): WOkkkEeRErrKkRerR
@@lukedoyle2770 I’m honestly surprised he recommend Blue Eye Samurai when if anything he should hate it because besides the feminist themes and the only white man is the villain. He must only like it because of the naked women.
@@RazorRex nah, he wants the princess as his dommie mommy
Wow, great finish from the immortal Sir Charles Chaplin.
Sitcoms have had incompetent or problematic male figures for a long time.
Adult cartoons especially. Think of Homer Simpson.
Completely different. Dads being a little bit useless at 'normal' things, whilst being hyper-competent in other areas is a reflection of Life.
Source: Am a Dad.
This works in a sitcom because there is something of everyday life that is funny about it - everyone can laugh at Homer being incompetent - because the writers don't hate Homer.
Homer is actually a good dad in many respects. He provides for his family and makes an effort - not always successfully, but that never stops him.
@@MajesticDemonLord
If you think the way modern television portrays most father figures is a reflection of life, your bubble is unfortunate.
@@pathogeneration5138 Show me a Dad who doesn't identify with elements of Homer's character.
The jokes are funny and work because there is an element of truth to them.
@MajesticDemonLord
The problem isn't that Homer exists. Homer is hilarious. It's that portraying men, all through media, as the inept, sorry, wrong and corrected butt of the joke, was beyond a joke, decades and hundreds of monotonous examples ago.
There's been a glimpse of reprieve recently. But it's still a hateful, brain aborted wasteland out there.
Homer is one stereotype among dozens being worked in THE SIMPSONS.
@@MajesticDemonLord
ruclips.net/video/BWSByQVP6ro/видео.htmlsi=POkBSzN8yGvxPF6_
12 years ago
Refutes "how men are portrayed" by showing "Fall Guy" which portrays a man as a spineless (ha! pun), weak, emotional punching bag for a good portion of the movie whose entire purpose in life is to get some sort of validation from a woman that the movie *TELLS US* he broke up with/ghosted instead of showing us how it happened, all so that anyone watching the movie will fill in the blanks with their own story. Which alienates half the goddam audience which is probably why the movie didn't do so well.
I mean, if we are going to nit-pick some dude on the internet, nit-picking is on the table. Fall Guy was as "beta orbiter" as you can get for half the movie.
Also "temporarily unavailable" lol cmon man.
Fall Guy does show you what happened and why he ghosted her.
Somehing i Noticed about CD is:
He'll Critique, Works that
He Likes
(Albeit with some "Debatable" Ponts)
But
He Won't Do The Same, for works that he
Doesn't Like
Which I think, Diminishes his Validity/Authenticity as a Reviewer
what is the point of this video? where is the proof to the title? nowhere to be found)
It's badly edited: I guess it wanted to show the Drinker is wrong by showing counter-exemples as a form of argumentation.
I assume its attention grabbing by leeching off a more successful You-Tube critic.
It's a parasitic creator. He gets views, he makes money, gets comments, which YT also values, even if by fractions of a cent, etc. It doesn't matter if his videos get ratio'ed to hell, it still makes a little bit of cash. There're plenty of these. Fortunately, you can always go back to the page where you clicked on this, then use the three-dot button: "Do not recommend channel". That does end up making them disappear for good.
Critical Drinker is tough but fair..if he says a movie is worth watching, I will watch it. His judgement has never let me down and he doesn’t trash movies without explaining his reasoning. If CD warns a movie is dire…it is, and you waste your box office money at your peril.
You _might_ want to try counselling, because the characteristics that Critical Drinker lionises can also be symptoms of trauma
@@williamchamberlain2263
They're also symptoms of CHARACTER, and the spine of western civilization that is "aka" the Pillars.
I promise you, and test this thesis at will: The future of liberties that is the lap of luxury you inhabit, will not be preserved by simpering weebs with cat ears, and furries in touch with their feels.
Damn, i’m so sorry you missed Midsommar :/
@@lukedoyle2770 It was just a movie that glorifies shock and trauma, good movie, sure but not anything worthwhile or original...maybe even harmful to your mental health
So you are pointing to the exceptions, as if they disprove the premise.
*clap clap*
Well, I don't see that the premise was presented in a way that can be easily proved or disproved. This video at least presents a number of *iconic* scenes that go against what Critical Drinker is calling for, so it at least demonstrates the benefits of having space for a wide variety of different portrayals of "masculinity".
Just posted the exact same premise. Yes
@@williambarton5681they're iconic because the men are actually presented within the realm of the traditional masculine archetype.
@@williambarton5681 Drinkers point is that a large number of big-budget movies were absolute flops because of a certain pernicious ideology.
In an attempt to disprove this claim, the Poster points to a number of mid-range budget movies (Okay, Top gun was Big-Budget...) that *did not* adhere to said ideology and (as a result) were wildly successful.
This is not the refutation that you think it is.
@@MajesticDemonLord Wee Willy's only point is to make insecure, stupid teenage boys (and grown men with the emotional maturity of teenage boys) angry about nothing, because it's a relatively easy way to exploit RUclips's algorithm and get rich.
he said Peter Parker is written/potrayed as a failure and miserable in Across The Spider Verse is because Peter Parker is a white man.
That was when I had enough of him. Totally neglecting the dynamic and internal struggle of Peter trying to protect Miles and in the same time being his mentor.
Marvel writers like giving Peter a hard time only bcuz he's white /s
1. You seem to think its impossible for male writers or director to make a movie that depicts men as dumb or bad
2. He's talking about a general direction. Of course there are exceptions. You finding 2-3 scenes that dont align dont disprove the general assessment.
3. Interestingly when he talked about advertisements you dont use your usual argumentof just finding one contradictory clip: Was it that hard to find a good counterexample or did you notice the flaw in your logic?
You seem to intentionally misunderstand his ideas and try to refute extreme versions of them (He said that a few decades ago men were less emotional on screen -> "he must think men previously never cried on screen, here is a clip to disprove that").
In the end its just about politics: You're probably left so you like the development in Hollywood or your desired end point is still so far away from reality that you find the changes between then and now inconsequential so you dont understand why anyone could complain. You are using the same 'gaslighting'-argument leftists often use when people are talking about the societal shift to the left (in my country at least) and act like things have always been this way.
@@harrystyles7466 Hollywood is literally capitalism how the hell is Hollywood leftist?
@@harrystyles7466 the reason they keep making feminist movies is not because they’re leftists but because they make money, same happens often with gay characters.
Hollywood is not run by leftists, but the people running Hollywood are using pink and rainbow capitalism to gain money. They do not hate men, most of these movies and most of the important roles are still assigned to men, they just want money, and if being from any minority became ilegal they would make movies about rarely defying the status quo cause they just want money
"Male characters are bad when they show emotions and talk about how they feel!"
You mean male characters who... act like complex people? Does he want to watch a film full of flat stereotypes?
He's idolizing Clint Eastwood/ptsd
Well, you got off to a bad start by implying the Drinker is wrong to say many women are creatives in Hollywood because you show the top grossing movies are written & directed by men. So doesn't that tell you that all the projects women are in charge of--and there are MANY--are NOT high grossers?
Most, in fact, are pretty spectacular failures. Like The Acolyte, Indy 5, She-Hulk, The Marvels, Obi-Wan Kenobi, The Eternals...and that's just at Disney! In the last 3 years!
Pretty disengenous. First off, all of the shows you mentioned have done great viewing wise, like immensly well(Except maybe She-Hulk, but it did fine numbers).
Secondly "The Marvels failed at the box office!" Yed, during a writer/actor strike so was barely promoted, and that movie needed two Disney+ shows to be understood, which most people don't care enough to. But then what happened? The movie blew up on Disney+ and was the most watched once it aired there, almost as if Disney are trying to kill theaters and just do everything through streaming... not even a tinfoil hat thing, it's very apparent.😊
@@Lithosagymfan173 no shit Sherlock. Who would have thought an Obi Wan series would have had a lot of ppl watching it, not like Star Wars fans have been waiting for it for decades. Then comes the acolyte, which is the least viewed star wars show, because: 1) nobody cared to watch it in the first place 2) it's a bunch of crap 3) after the quality of obi wan series everyon got a good understanding of what's disney been cooking. Exactly the same arguments go for Indiana Jones. Now imagine calling someone's comment disingenuous while arguing these dog water of series/movies got the views they did thanks to anything else but fans/consumers love for franchises they ruined.
@@nickandreyev766 1) Many people cared, Critical Drinker himself where he reviewed every episode. Also it 488million for its two first episodes, higher than everything else other than Kenobi. The views were apparently delining as the series went but so does every series(Except maybe Breaking Bad), and I can't find actual viewership number from a trusted source
2) That's an opinion
3) I don't know, Obi-Wan got fine ratings, 3.5, to 70%, to 82, to 73 just from top pages. Most people found the show alright enough
Also, it has been proven The Acolyte has been review bombed to hell, to the point Acolytes a 2008 film is getting review bombed now with comments like "You ruined Star Wars!" Even Geeks+Gamers made a tweet how happy they're review bombing it. Also, it's also as if not everyone is chronically online(Like me, frfr) and usually doesn't care about what drama is going on, most people saw The Acolyte, were like "Sure, why not?" and then either continued or stopped. Also, by your own logic, Critical Drinker and his gang of racists are consumers since they watched the show weekly, i:e gave Disney more money, to "make more trash."
@@Lithosagymfan173 so the fact that you googled the 488m figure and provided it as an argument, but didn't scroll the page down to see that it is actually the worst result of all their products (except for Andor, which is pretty much non existent in the media sphere, but an ok series) speaks for itself. And who actually would have thought that a content creator, who's job it is to review stuff, will be watching it. Also how can you call the acolyte being crap an "opinion", but then refer to Obi Wan rating (which is higher anyway) in the same sentence. You say "most" people think the acolyte is whatever. Who exactly are these people? From what I gather (after investing about 2 minutes into researching), it's got low viewer scores basically everywhere. Now I could assume that it's some kind of neckbeard conspiracy to gather together and ruin the ratings of this misunderstood masterpiece so that nobody will ever find this hidden gem. Or I could just take it for what it is. I don't know anything about review bombing the acolyte, and neither do I care, if people find it fun and worth their time, then so be it. I also don't know anything about anyone's racist friends, and, again, I don't particularly care, because I assume your and mine definitions of racism would be vastly different. I just stopped by to point out the obvious fact that the number of views of these at most mediocre shows/movies has nothing to do with their actual quality, but everything to do with fanbase expectations/hype.
@@nickandreyev766 As I said, large showing at first and started declining as the series went, most things goes this way. There was a show called Ultraman Blazar, amazing first few episodez showing and then the next few episodes could not resch half the views of the first 3 or 4 episodes. Also, I saw charts, it was the best of their products after Obi-Wan, if anything Boba Fett or Andor are usually the worst viewership wise.
The Acolyte got review bombed, that's a fact, that's why it has 'lower' scores everywhere. It's not even a conspiracy, the thing got more ratings that all Mandalorian seasons combined, more than The Batman, a movie that made a billion, we even saw reviews coming minutes after episodes released, how much? 5 minutes, meaning before anyone could watch the episode and give am actual opinion.
By "most" people, I mean normies, usually just casual fans or ones that were somewhat intrigued by the trailer hearing all the buzz around, whether negative or positive.
Finally, Drinker is quite racist, comparing Kong to slave trades(Yes) and his buddy Nerdrotic loves making racist jokes like calling Mexican Tacos(And calling Hispanics Mexicans, cause "they all look alike.") or the terribld Native jokes he made about Echo(Like "closing the reserves."). We also have Ryan Kinel, a guy who gets angry when a black guy is on screen and conpared George Floyd to a dead bear as a "joke." Oh, did I forget how he keeps spreading the "white male is being replaced" and "white men are always evil when they shouldn't," both falling under Great Replacement Theory, which by the way, is racist(Go ask the Chinese, they sure loved livinv during that time).
He definitely understands them enough to be successful...
(but goodluck on trying to build a career off of hate, that always works out really well for people)
Yeah no. The Critical Stinker is only successful by pandering to the lowest demographic- he’s the Butt Rock equal to RUclips critics.
Also: “build a career out of hate”? Last I checked The Critical Stinker is the one saying bigoted things.
@@RazorRexEven if he isn't a bigot(Hs is), he made a few videos outright hating on Brie Larson and mocking her, not the characters she plays, the actress herself, for like maybe being cringe.
How many videos has he done on Russel Brand or Weinstein though?
He understands his target audience well enough to be successful. That’s not the same as understanding movies.
@@BoboftheOldeWays As in he panders to them instead of being honest with them.
@@Lithosagymfan173 So what? Can someone not like cheese larson? Or should we all bow to the woke unimind? And btw, cheese is a no good "actor" with the same emotional range of a bag of rocks, a face that looks like an old crt tv set (makes me wonder where she keeps the remote), and has the mental capacity of a disabled 12 years old (aka feminist).
And your point was...?
Men are such snowflakes. There’s a blizzard in this comment section coming straight from CD! 😂
Wow, what an ignorant, terrible video.
Actually showed why/how CD's points are correct with half the 'critiques.'
idk man, the stats at the beginning doesn't account for the last 5 years. in a dynamic industry like films that 5 years is really important to know.
Especially when studios have been falling over themselves to give opportunities to women. I wonder if that's why those years were left off the graph.
@@merlin5662 Yeah no the film industry is still male dominated. Like only 17 out the 47 movies I saw this year had female leads.
@@RazorRex that means nothing here. I could say "I watched 50 films and 47 had female leads". Those 5 years are really important here, bc Within 5 years we had a dramatic shift in the industry.
@@merlin5662 What I’m getting at is that you people claim that “Hollywood hates men” and that “women are taking over. Yet you have nothing to back it up seeing that again the film industry is still male dominated both and behind the camera.
Are you serious? You've taken isolated examples that conflict with the drinker's critiques of modern movies and suggested that he's therefore wrong? Of course there are outliers, you geniuses. Anyone with a brain knows that. His overall point about the direction that men's and women's roles and skills within movies are heading is true.
Finding outliers doesn't negate the narrative.
You missed the bit where 80% of entertainment is still centered on dudes. They're not outliers, you dribbling simp.
@DagwoodDogwoggle Stinker makes content akin to AI.
@@TheShepdawg9 Another typical Critical Stinker worshipper detected.
@@RazorRex not really refuting my point but thanks anyway kiddo
@@TheShepdawg9 If you actually paid attention you’d realize Critical Stinker got things wrong and is a hypocrite. Big Trouble In Little China is one of his favorite movies YET as the video pointed out the protagonist is an idiot and has to be saved by a minority character and Martin Riggs is not “stoic”.
Also, ‘more than 10 or 15 years old’. I guarantee the dude hasn’t seen a film that came out before Jaws. Men with feelings were ALWAYS there, just look at Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans. 1927 ffs.
I also hate the constant cliche retort of strong female characters ‘critics’ like him use being Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connor. Maybe watch Erin Brockovich? Little Women? The Passion of Joan of Arc? ‘Strong’ doesn’t just mean being in an action movie.
"I guarantee the dude hasn’t seen a film that came out before Jaws."
He recommended Twelve Angry Men, which came out almost two decades before Jaws. So your guarantee is worthless.
@@georgebailey8179 Twelve Angry Men is full of emotion - Critically Drunk is a hypocrite who's opinion is invalid
@@williamchamberlain2263 So I prove your "guarantee" wrong, and instead of admitting that you were talking out of your arse, you double down and claim, without evidence, that the CD is a hypocrite. What is hypocritical about him recommending an old film with emotion in it? It seems to fit with his dislike of emotionless Mary Sues.
And it isn't even the only emotion-filled pre-Jaws film he's recommended. There's It's a Wonderful Life too. I suspect he likes emotions in films. I don't get all the hate against him. He points out the good and bad in films, whether he likes the film overall or not. I think that's to his credit.
@@georgebailey8179 His opinion is invalid because I don’t need him to know that 1917 is good and that Morbius is bad.
@georgebailey8179
When i’m wrong, i’m wrong. Fair play calling me out there. I just remembered too he’s also mentioned 60s Bond flicks and The Godfather. 12 Angry Men is a total banger, but he still seems pretty set in a certain box. The classics he recommends are already highly regarded, we don’t actually gain recommendations from watching his channel. I mean shit, most can be found on IMDB’s top 250.
I maintain he’s about outrage, and doesn’t give a flick about introducing people to good ones.
PS cool name btw, Wonderful Life fkn rules ❤️
2:05 he told u the problem, too many men character are shown dumb incompetent & needed saving by a diverse character. Of course we can like one or two character like that but having too many of them is a problem. Isn't it ? Whenever some awesome male characters are brought to screen he praises them as well. Why did u exclude that? As ur title suggests u r making a vid on his entire personality & not just this one vid he made. Did u even watch anything else from him ? U didn't finish ur research
did you notice that to make a counter point to what the drinker claimed they used a bunch of clips from shows and movies that have strong male leads but left out the fact that every single clip used is from something that the drinker has recommended.
This is someone with 200 subs and 11 videos making unsubstantiated claims about someone with over 2 million subs and hundreds of videos. Clout chasing and trying to punch up to build a channel which seems to be based around just saying that popular creators are wrong by making videos which make wild claims and then provide no proof or create misrepresentations to fit a narrative to stir up garbage. Either they are just really bad at doing research and making valid points or they are just really immature and don't know how.
Male are already competent, what is this take?
@@erikkayVahaahahah, Drinker does the exact same thing with his clips 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Daniel Craig’s Bond is easily the best, because he’s relatable. I’d wager a year’s wages that the ‘drinker’ isn’t the stoic man that Connery was, and actually does have feelings like y’know, a fkn human?
He’s not a film critic, he’e a culture warrior. Simple as that.
@@lukedoyle2770
"Relatable" is the most tiresome insistence of insecure and unimaginative audiences and writers.
It's just an admission that Craig's Bond is 'less' Bond.
Bond is Bond BECAUSE he's a Swiss Army Human. BECAUSE he occupies a practically mythological iteration of action hero.
But the classic ‘Bond’ has no depth whatsoever. Don’t get me wrong ‘Goldfinger’ is a great watch but it’s total surface. If you think the writing in something like Casino Royale is lazy I really got no response tbh, to each their own i guess
@@lukedoyle2770
A change to form is a change.
Some addition is a form of subtraction.
Knowing the backstory of THE CROW makes him more engaging.
Not knowing the backstory of THE JOKER in Dark Knight makes him menacing.
Casino Royale is an excellent film, but it's more Borne than Bond.
When you ground it in that sort of grit and wet emotion, Bond loses its mythical charm.
That’s a solid argument mate. But it’s not like Craig’s Bond is the first time he was humanised either. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service had his humanism nailed at the ending. My point was more that the Drinker is totally full of crap
@@lukedoyle2770
You could relate this to the Star Wars controversy.
And why people are so pissed off and hurt about the gross mishandling of Luke Skywalker.
Sure, in reality, humans can fall and fail, and shift and change.
But this isn't a gritty cinema verite. It's mythic fairytale.
You can allow Luke to grow. But the change must be earned, must make sense, and must serve a mythic purpose.
Otherwise you don't grasp the substance of what the mythic fantasy is.
Nobody who loves Luke Skywalker wants to see him like this. And that's not a good subversive reason to do it.
Sure?
They told me he understands so much of movies that he can review stuff he didn't even watch :D
/s
A few years ago there was this guy - the Lazy Critic - who would critize films he admitedly didn't see, based on trailers and hearsay. He was, of course, right almost every time.
look up the concept 'the exception does not disprove the rule' that might help you out, because sure you can find examples but a few examples do not make a trend, that what Drinker is getting at.
@@mcbean1 Typical Critical Stinker shill
@@mcbean1 EXCEPT more examples of Critical Stinker’s hypocrisy can be provided. He is a liar and panderer.
If "the exception does not disprove the rule" then we can conclude that that middle aged boy just hates women and black people?
Sounds like somebody can’t handle a contrary opinion.
you?
@@muzzler24 The person going out of their way to make a video whining about a critic
Look in the mirror.
@@RazorRex Go crawl into your safe space.
@@ForceMaximus84 A critic who LIES and PANDERS to his audience while making tons of money doing it.
Critical Drinker is a textbook example of "seeing what you want to see instead of what's actually there".
@@John73John And he only tells his audience what they want to hear.
Time to doomscroll the comment section.
Yeh, it's filled with people who haven't quite worked out how to escape the red pill side of the algorithm yet.
There's always hope.
What would you expect? His books (from what I heard) are hot garbage.
one of them(book) has an upcoming movie, he only uploaded a trailer, he and his friends dont even talk about it, they didnt even react to the trailer on their channels, the trailer also shows a whamen taking down a guy twice her size, lol
@@narem1092 Also get this: he hates on “Mary Sue” characters YET he ends up making the biggest ones.
@@RazorRexthis guy's onto sum' Freudian business
@@filipedias7284Pardon?
@@RazorRex Freud was a Czech physician who developed a pseudoscientific (or protoscientific?) approach to study the human psyche that's considered a precursor to modern psychology (as alchemy to chemistry, astrology to astronomy etc.) and it largely revolved around the concept of a dichotomy between the conscious and the unconscious selves, with the latter housing one's true desires and repressed beliefs, moreover posing that these repressed aspects of one's persona could bubble up to the surface and manifest themselves in different manners. So, essentially, in Freudian theory a given expression of one's persona which is fundamentally at odds with their alleged beliefs could be interpreted as a reflexion of their own repressed beliefs and desires.
Nowadays Freud's work subsists in the popular imagination mostly through cynical references to the concept of a "Freudian slip", as well as to his unconventional incest-related musings.
Mmm, how's that clout taste? Bitter, like sucking on a coin?
Hypogrift
It's amazing that the Uncritical Grifter has managed to make a career out of media-illiteracy.
@@timothymaroney4497 He does so by pandering to idiots and only telling them what they want to hear. Also “Uncritical Grifter” that’s a good one. I call him “Critical Stinker”.
Kinda funny trying to argue against the Drinker's point while Disney Is still making films and shows. Plus the first minute or so of the video proved his point: people like well written characters, men who act like men do and woman who act like women do, reacher is a good example of a well written story with well written characters. Also putting some clips of the drinker out of context and spamming some other random clips from films/shows out of context isn't an actual argument, the only thing i got out of this video is probably ADHD. With this being said, i don't agree with everything the drinker says but you can check by yourself that most of the times the film or show which he doesn't like and give a low score, actually have a low score on rotten tomatoes.
@@sterminino Yet Stinker shilled for Terminal List a boring as hell show that had a cliched plot.
@basic_unit My point is that show has poorly-written characters and yet he sucked up to it all to pander to his one hive-minded audience.
@@RazorRex He is not a God, he Is a human like us, he can do errors too some times and as I said i do not agree with all he says. I've watched terminal list and It wasn't that bad (btw i found It on Amazon, i didn't watched any review Just saw Chris Pratt and gave it a try). The show story was kinda simple compared to Reacher but still managed to give some good action scenes, plus the brain damage thing was probably the better part to me.
@@sterminino “He is a human like us” except he’s literally the 1%. He makes tons of money whining about movies and shows being progressive and minorities.
@@RazorRex most of the times drinker calls out a film/show not because there are strong females or minorities, but because the story is shite, the acting is shite etc. long story short he reviews badly films which are made for spreading political views and stuff instead of entertaining. There Is nothing progressive in putting more minorities or more women in film, its quite the opposite considering what happened to Disney Marvel and Disney star wars (my eyes still burn).
I see a channel full of envy & jelousy videos towards CD...
And not a single counter-argument was actually made lmao. No, I get it, you want us to imagine the argument your're making based on flashes of statistics and clips from films.
Great way to leave plenty of room for yourself to shift the goalposts. This is just baiting people into making an argument for you, but you haven't actually said anything yourself.
Go away now.
You struggling there, pal? Need some help?
Hey Drinker...GUESS WHAT, MEN CAN CRY and be emotional!
I wonder if this guy has ever seen Taxi Driver. I'd love to see him describe it.
@@futurestoryteller
Watch his review of JOKER, and you might get a better understanding of who he actually is.
@@pathogeneration5138 And then he should watch his video about "Game Industry" and he will see that Drinker pretends to know everything. Also his "drunk scotish guy" gimic is already boring
@@futurestoryteller Probably nothing good lol
@@thehedgehognerd
Probably nothing good huh.
Taxi Driver is completely in the wheelhouse of what CD would praise.
Being that it's, you know, beyond competently made? By a living legend of film?
You think he understands nought. Eh what is more certain is you don't understand him.
honestly, if I didnt know any better I would think the drinker is just a troll
There’s _nothing_ wrong whatsoever with seeing a grown man cry (😢).
It depends on why he's crying. There is always a reason why it could be wrong.
@@Borgassmord OK, fair point (👌).
Drinker's ideal hero is literally just the 80's macho man stereotype. Which shows that his tastes haven't evolved in 40 plus years.
Also explains the boring looking movie that he helped write.
Except that's not even true of the examples given here. As much as CD might lean more towards masculine archetypes than me, that's a reductive take.
He's outlining an assortment of qualities. And the way hardly anyone's actually 'cool' anymore.
The selective citation of characters emoting hard, doesn't belie that. They're still to be found however.
Kaluuya may 'Nope' out in parts, of Nope, but he's a quintessential case study in stoic cool.
CD is speaking to the aggregate of characterisation, and he's not wrong.
I don't think so. He speaks highly of things like Arcane and Blue Eye Samurai
@@M_k-zi3tnProbably only because the woman in that show made his tiny insecure dong hard.
Also if anything, he should hate those shows. Arcane had LGBT characters and Blue Eye Samurai has an Asian cast with the only villain being a white man.
@@M_k-zi3tnHe probably only likes those shows because of the attractive women and if anything he should hate them. Arcane has LGBT characters and Blue Eye Samurai has an Asian cast with the villain being the only white man.
I love the cope in the comments.
Classic drinker, buzz words and borderline sexism and misogyny.
Borderline?
Literal who youtuber desperately trying to get relevancy off the clout of others
@@axt2 Oh my gosh how dare we speak against the 1%.
"Literal who youtuber desperately trying to get relevancy off the clout of others" Yes, that perfectly summarises the manchild tantrum channels like "critical drinker" etc. They gain "relevancy" with chuds by telling them what they already believe about female creative professionals and "fah-munazm."
As opposed to get relevancy off movie titles?
Take your downvote and don't do a JJ Abrams. Do better instead.
Drinker: Men need to be tougher and more stoic, and take what they are given without being emotional
Also Drinker: *moans, whines, and wets his pants cause a woman was on screen for .0821 seconds longer than a man*
lol calm down
@@drunkplaylists1829 all I'm doing is insulting him, I'm not worked up
@@gregthepeglegpregdreg You sound extremely worked up.
@@gregthepeglegpregdreg Ironic.
@@drunkplaylists1829 Look who’s talking.
109 people can't be wrong! 😆
That sounds like Critical Drinker's "I'm something of a sigma male myself" manifesto.
TLDR for the pro-stoicism dilettantes; being emotionally reserved is also a result of trauma and PTSD, which a lot of guys used to have from military service, abusive parents, neglectful or alcoholic parents, severely strict schooling, or losing friends to dangerous jobs unsafe cars and alcohol.
Thank you algorithm
Brilliant!
No he isn't and neither are you.
Brilliantly done
COPE 😂
@@richtea615 Like how you are with Stinker being exposed?
Thank You for blasting the Drinkers lies and Grifting
FAIL
next time you see critical drinker in the street, go up to him and shout "dont cry rambo!" right in his whining grifter face!
I live in Edinburgh, Scotland, which is south of Fife, where he apparently lives. I honestly look forward to the day I recognise him in the street, I would definitely tell him what I think of him.
@@imcallingjapan2178 give him one for me lol
who cares, hes handsome
I love this video
Scottish