I think MFDs in general need a re-tooling. I find myself really thinking about the MFD layout when I'm contemplating which ship to use for various things, and I don't think something as trivial as that should be a real factor.
@@eyesofheimdall6510 I hope they rework them to give a bit more style to each ship. Having the same interface on all ships breaks the immersion for me. There could be common factors to be displayed but ooooh boy if they customize it to each ship
I like the idea, but with my limited knowledge of coding that seems like it would be a nightmare to implement from a dev standpoint. However, a twist to it might work. What about allowing for limited customization. I'm not saying something as intense as Starfield's ship customization system, but being able to move cockpit/bridge components around in a limited area, with color/opacity selection seems reasonable to me. Though once again, I am not a coder, so I don't have the knowledge base to say how 'simple' even that would be.
@@eyesofheimdall6510 Couldn't agree more. would be a coding nightmare especially with SC's infamous technical issues. I think with all the funding they've amassed and Starfield coming out, they'll definitely be borrowing/tweaking here and there. I know it's a single player (Starfield), but bound to have an impact on the genre
I see the Starfield release as nothing but good for SC. It might eat into player count for a bit, but I think that for people who get into Starfield, mostly enjoy it, but with there were a multiplayer aspect to it, SC is going to look really enticing.
Also that was a joke! Good stuff my only gripe would be, 1 were here for the ship dont say “im not going to waste ur time viewing the ship” 2: have a bit more or a direction when reviewing i.e outside> inside> then bottom to top for example. It will help us understand the layout a bit better even without watching it fully ( i listened to the video and watched what i wanted to see) 3 add your personal insider to the video! You said you were in the military? Give us civilians your perceptive of how you look at the ship! Like how u did with the bridge deck ! Subbed interested in more. Also fix the title its like the name of the file u uploaded to youtube, it doesn’t peak interest to click on the video. Now “ex millary reviews star citizens biggest luxury capital ship in game the 890j “ that would’ve made me want to click it faster i scrolled past it 2-4 times b4 i said w.e im at work anyway
I do appreciate the feedback. The time waste comment was about the staterooms, I didn't see the point in showing four completely identical rooms, tho I may have misspoken there, I'll have to rewatch it to catch the wording! I do follow a loose script, and the directionality of this ship is particularly challenging since it doesn't flow like any other ship, having two distinct sections, with multiple decks on each. The military perspective is something I try not to throw around to avoid sounding pretentious, many veterans of my generation have a habit of using the "speaking as a Vet, I'm right and everyone else is wrong" card, and I am always reticent to do that for non-infantry specific things. The title thing is to game the search parameters since my channel is still small, tho I do think I'm going to strive for a bit more creativity in them. I didn't intend this to be an essay, and I do apologize for the run-on sentences!
i see! but we would like to see ! worst case scenario we would skip 10 seconds, but I see where you're coming from! and you're bit them! You understand what's annoying, and how to avoid it, so that make you unique to this space! and IMO I would love to hear some feedback about it! thanks for the reply@@eyesofheimdall6510
![An Architect Reviews the Anvil Carrack [Star Citizen]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ybsu2Af9AI0/mqdefault.jpg)
![An Architect Reviews the Anvil Carrack [Star Citizen]](/img/tr.png)
The 890 should win ship showdown and be crowned best in show to get its first ever paint.. a ship this beautiful deserves at least one paint
IDK, I actually like the clean white and offset clean jet black look that it already has.
The PreWorkout-Idea made ma rofl
Immediately thought of my commander from Afghanistan when I saw it! He downed C4 like it was gonna pan out for gold in the tubs.
The MFDs on this ship are so outdated.. and yes it's so heavy in atmo!
Great video
I think MFDs in general need a re-tooling. I find myself really thinking about the MFD layout when I'm contemplating which ship to use for various things, and I don't think something as trivial as that should be a real factor.
@@eyesofheimdall6510 I hope they rework them to give a bit more style to each ship. Having the same interface on all ships breaks the immersion for me. There could be common factors to be displayed but ooooh boy if they customize it to each ship
I like the idea, but with my limited knowledge of coding that seems like it would be a nightmare to implement from a dev standpoint. However, a twist to it might work. What about allowing for limited customization. I'm not saying something as intense as Starfield's ship customization system, but being able to move cockpit/bridge components around in a limited area, with color/opacity selection seems reasonable to me. Though once again, I am not a coder, so I don't have the knowledge base to say how 'simple' even that would be.
@@eyesofheimdall6510 Couldn't agree more. would be a coding nightmare especially with SC's infamous technical issues. I think with all the funding they've amassed and Starfield coming out, they'll definitely be borrowing/tweaking here and there. I know it's a single player (Starfield), but bound to have an impact on the genre
I see the Starfield release as nothing but good for SC. It might eat into player count for a bit, but I think that for people who get into Starfield, mostly enjoy it, but with there were a multiplayer aspect to it, SC is going to look really enticing.
150k full hydrogen refuel
That is absurd! But also, kind of awesome!
I commit insurance fraud to avoid paying. 😎
What the f**k does your title say
Also that was a joke! Good stuff my only gripe would be,
1 were here for the ship dont say “im not going to waste ur time viewing the ship”
2: have a bit more or a direction when reviewing i.e outside> inside> then bottom to top for example. It will help us understand the layout a bit better even without watching it fully ( i listened to the video and watched what i wanted to see)
3 add your personal insider to the video! You said you were in the military? Give us civilians your perceptive of how you look at the ship! Like how u did with the bridge deck !
Subbed interested in more.
Also fix the title its like the name of the file u uploaded to youtube, it doesn’t peak interest to click on the video. Now “ex millary reviews star citizens biggest luxury capital ship in game the 890j “ that would’ve made me want to click it faster i scrolled past it 2-4 times b4 i said w.e im at work anyway
I do appreciate the feedback. The time waste comment was about the staterooms, I didn't see the point in showing four completely identical rooms, tho I may have misspoken there, I'll have to rewatch it to catch the wording! I do follow a loose script, and the directionality of this ship is particularly challenging since it doesn't flow like any other ship, having two distinct sections, with multiple decks on each. The military perspective is something I try not to throw around to avoid sounding pretentious, many veterans of my generation have a habit of using the "speaking as a Vet, I'm right and everyone else is wrong" card, and I am always reticent to do that for non-infantry specific things. The title thing is to game the search parameters since my channel is still small, tho I do think I'm going to strive for a bit more creativity in them. I didn't intend this to be an essay, and I do apologize for the run-on sentences!
"Star Citizen, 3 19 1, 890 Jump Review"
i see! but we would like to see ! worst case scenario we would skip 10 seconds, but I see where you're coming from! and you're bit them! You understand what's annoying, and how to avoid it, so that make you unique to this space! and IMO I would love to hear some feedback about it! thanks for the reply@@eyesofheimdall6510