Nice one , they both sound great. Personally, I've never come across a sample library as easy to play as ARO, almost no need for switching articulations anymore amazing! it also reminds me of the John Barry string sound so rich .
Like in your first video: The sound of ARO is so warm, balanced and homogeneous, but I cannot help myself, I find the ARO Strings simply lack life, they sound so terribly sterile / static.
![Spitfire's Abbey Road Strings - [SCORING and REVIEW]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GGJ98h04GYI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Spitfire's Abbey Road Strings - [SCORING and REVIEW]](/img/tr.png)
![Watch this BEFORE you buy Cinematic Studio Strings [REVIEW]](/img/1.gif)
Nice one , they both sound great. Personally, I've never come across a sample library as easy to play as ARO, almost no need for switching articulations anymore amazing! it also reminds me of the John Barry string sound so rich .
I agree completely. It’s a joy to programme and far less fiddly than CSS
@@TomHarroldMusic Switch on Eco mode and you will see the RAM drop right down . :)
Like in your first video: The sound of ARO is so warm, balanced and homogeneous, but I cannot help myself, I find the ARO Strings simply lack life, they sound so terribly sterile / static.
Cool piece, can you include BBCSO as well?
Have to agree. It's tragic how overlooked the legato is in BBCSO Pro, it's incredible for runs.
As always css is far superior in every aspect 😉
Almost…programming is more fiddly in CSS, the negative delay is a big learning curve, and having a scalable GUI is a definite plus…
….all easier in Spitfire products