The Worst "Modern" Tank
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Charity: sp4ukraine.org/
The Soviet T-62 was a capable machine when it first was introduced in the 1950s. How does it stack up today, against the most modern Western main battle tanks such as the M1 Abrams and Leopard 2? The answer: not great. I wanted to post this later but with the Gaijin boycott going on later this week, my hand was kinda forced.
Check the channel "About" section for the link to the creator of my profile picture.
Songs used (in order from first to last):
Command and Conquer: Generals - Makin' A Sweep, Fight For Peace, In The Field, Comanche Down
Halo 3: ODST - Rain (Deference for Darkness)
Sound mods:
Epic Thunder (Pre-release)
Gunner HEAT PC Crew Voices Mod (Personal, go play the game: gunnerheatpc.com/ )
Second channel: / @spookstoon
Patreon: / spookston
Twitter: / spookston
Reddit: /u/spookston
Discord: See my Patreon page.
#warthunder #tanks #tankhistory
The Worst "Modern" Tank
Charity: sp4ukraine.org/
Day 11 of asking too play the Bt-42
Donate to me i giv to zelensky pls
i love you
Based 🇺🇦
franzJ reference 3:12
Imagine being in a modern M1 Abrams tank thinking you're on top of the world and suddenly you hear Stalin noises and your tank explodes. What a gigachad that Katyusha player is
BM-31, so andryusha.
@@beefyblom fun fact its shell was called Luka for a 18+ poem hero with the shape of THIS THING similar to the shell.
Gigachad-🤖🤖🤖
@@russman3787 yes
Comrade Stalin blessed him!
Taking current state of WT under consideration I think it's great time for more historical vids.
I have one planned for Friday
agreed
agreed x2
@@Spookston yes!
I doubt they'll use it like that.... but we'll ssseeee
Day 2 of asking Spookston to play M13 because it's the Falcon of 1.7
M13 mgmc?
Yes the machine gun motor carriage
The british one is better cuz its on better chassis
@@wheet1813 multiple gun motor carriage
@@KumaFall all along I thought it's machine gun :v
I like how you killed like 3 tanks, didn't lose yours, and only got 37k. The economy for non-premium tanks is brutal...
And it is with a prenium account.
"Only got 37k" man the T-62 only takes like 3k 3500 Sl to repair, he profited a lot
@@wickendiana8310 Ok, if that's the case, then sure.
37k with 3.5k repair cost is very fair. 3 kills is not that much. The sad part is that it requires premium to get there, meaning that without premium you would have profited like 12k instead of 34 doubling the amount of games you should play atleast decently to buy something
@@gabonskaiagadziuka i too think torture is fine and lovely, everyone should stop complaining about getting tortured.
Spookston going from smug disappointment to complete astonishment when the BM-31 got the Abrams was classic.
Something that was much better was the swing fire which could take it out easily. The swing fire is still the only thing that is safe from the bad changes, meaning it’s the best now…….
Swingfire is the best atgm carrier not debatable
@@Minebrawlzzz The Striker is close behind
That's untill the IT-1 rolls around. It's quite fun to play. As long as you don't get swarmed by enemies during your reload, you're good.
@@alexmaximus9134 Even the reload is quite fast to be honest.
@@murmenaattori6 Park it at the cap, behind some cover, and the reload gets insane!
The guy in that Katyusha is an absolute Chad
I adore this thing, i like ancient vehicles that are heavily modernised to barely keep up with newer ones
Cant wait for russia to bring a chariot with ERA all over it to fight in ukraine
You must be a sucker for centurion and m60
Ah, everything russian
@@ыцццФццц modernized m60 goes hard
Cheaper and barely enouth to send a m1 to scrapyard.. and imagine there are still dpr reservists that are schooled on these Things! And the most old crap is moving on ukrainian side there you can even see the t54 t55 t62..
Props to that BM-31-12 for going against that Abrams AIM lol
I've been seeing that same guy in my matches with the BM-31-12 at top tier and every game he'd score 2-3 kills with it. Absolutely based
What’s his user, I need to add him so I can compliment him with a Sd.kfz.222
Just as a side note, the most likely role for those 50s MBT for russia is artillery. Those tanks actually came with field manual with instruction to do so back then.
Idk why he is saying frontline mbt
plus they got a shit ton of rounds laying around for those
@@kamov52510 Because there’re photos of them blown up?
Definitely, but I have a feeling with Russia's track record in this war that many of the outdated tanks will find themselves in very unfortunate situations. Theory and practice aren't always the same.
@@KY-qx9ipAnd?
Thank you Mr. Spookston! I appreciate you playing my suggestion and I love the content even when sometimes I don't love the game.
These line-fillers are seemingly intended as something like an assault gun, but yeah, they're getting pressed into all kinds of roles. The "Oh, we just need a bunker buster." Seems intended to soothe the crews.
Well, tank vs tank encounters are in fact somewhat rare, just like in most wars. It's not giant tank divisions smashing into eachother, it's mostly positional combat involving mainly infantry and artillery and drones, with tanks in support. The HE and machinegun on a tank is always the most important, followed by it's ability to protect against AT weapons, followed by it's ability to penetrate enemy tanks.
I've heard channels that talk to veterans from the Ukrainian side who also stated that tank vs tank encounters, so I don't think it's just Russian cope.
@@LN37275 The problem is that a lot of these older vehicles dont have any thermals, while most Ukranian AT crew do. The fact that tanks can get outranged by infantry is...pathetic to say the least. Then again, having a shit tank is better than no tank, as its still a big ass gun to bring to the battle. T-55s and such will be used as artillery because from what i've heard Russia is running low on 155/152/122mm artillery shells but has plenty of 100mm shells, which these things can fire. Still, can you imagine the US going "ah fuck, guess we'll send in the M60's"?
@@CrazyDutchguys “The fact that tanks can get out ranged by infantry is…pathetic to say the least.”
This reads like someone talking out of their ass, please elaborate?
@@schaddenkorp6977 The T-62's and T-55's being sent into battle don't have thermal optics for the most part. And if they do, they have un-cooled thermal optics, which have effective range of about 600 meters.
In comparison, the AT crews of Ukraine are using cooled thermal optics, which have an effective range of 10 miles, give or take, and allow the AT crews using weapons like the Javelin and NLAW to strike at tanks far outside of their thermal optics range (if they have any), or basically with impunity if said tanks they're engaging don't have thermal optics. Barring getting lucky and the crews (or supporting infantry if they have any) happen to see the attack directly, it's difficult for Russia's tank forces to react and deal with Ukrainian anti tank crews because of this disparity.
Thermal optics are super amazing to have in an environment where the background temperature of the landscape is much colder in general, which makes people and vehicles stick out (being hot in comparison). The landscape of Ukraine is perfect for thermal optic use, in compairson to places like Afghanistan, where the average background temperature is much higher.
Does that explanation suffice?
@@CrazyDutchguysRussia doesn’t have a lack of artillery shells, there are massive stockpiles that haven’t even been touched yet in different regions of Russia.
Correction regarding the T-54/55’s being used by Russia: they’re using them not as frontline tanks but as makeshift self-propelled artillery
Which still is embarrasing for russia
@@fuckinantipope5511 how? T55s were always intended to be used as arttilery
@@adrianotaylor7230 uh, no? T-55s were the soviets main battle tanks back in the day. They aren't artillery
@fuckinantipope5511 yeah and if you look at the training manual of the T55 you'd see that the crews were also trained on it to use it as indirect fire 🤦 a tank gun and an artillery gun both can send projectiles at a long distance and furthermore T55s arent even being sent with a commander due to it not needing to be used as a MBT
@@adrianotaylor7230 the guns aren’t necessarily effective as artillery due to their flatter, higher velocity projectiles compared to those of a howitzer
From what i read and understood about that is that they are using these tanks as cheap arty units reinforcements, since they got shitload of 100mm stockpiles. The crew also shifts from 4 to 3, since the commander is the platoon arty observer or something. If anyone has more intel about that.
hey at least T-55s have APHE which if you sneak around can get you decent side shots
You should try out the Ru-251. Its guite a fun tank
Have you tried the lvkv 9040 ? It apparently is a great flanker and even better anti air
As a huge Swedish Empire enjoyer, I highly recommend it.
i shot a drone out of the air at 9km with 1 shot of my dart, its really nice just think the ready ammo rack sucks
Just wait until after the update when all the cv90's get irst!
Cv90105
@@bigbadlara5304 Majority of CV90105 players have never experienced the wonders of the Swedish tech tree and it honestly shows in their gameplay; properly shit.
2:55 least skilled katyusha crew
T55s are currently being used as SPGs and artillery as far as I know
When no truck
CNN told me they were using T26s and biplanes.
Pretty sad for the supposedly second best army of the world
@@xi.na_ Smartest American? Now if you would not mind telling me, what happens to a barrel when it is used to shoot a lot of times? If you somehow figure that one out you should understand why they are being used as artillery right now
@@xi.na_ Says the "worlds strongest army"supporter whilst your army has its biggest recruiting chaos
They don't use them as MBTs, rather as heavily armored mobile artillery, they have plenty of ammo reserves, resistant to artillery barrage shrapnels and no modern electronics that could be easily jammed : )
Regular 155mm shells can be jammed they have no electronics lol.
Cope.
@@Ben-fk9ey this isnt reddit sir, cope has no value here
The T-62-M is so fun, slow turret, decent rounds, trolly but not reliable armor, it’s a relic of a top tier that used to be slow and methodical
18 seconds in and sorry Spookston but Russia isn’t fielding T-62s against Leopards or even against Ukrainians T-72 variants. They just have such a huge supply of them they’re using them for trench support/artillery in some instances. Ukraine is literally doing the same thing even using Maxim guns from museums and also using T-55s/ T-62s. Plus with APCs being super important in modern battlefield those old soviet tanks can still put pressure on low armor vehicles. I would advise not to follow west propaganda next time and try to stay neutral. As an American who’s against the war and not blindly following Ukrainian’s side.
Bruh there are russian T62s captured which got shot by 125mm from ukrainians
@@KingSpittusFactus Okay? You see the videos Ukrainians and Russians fighting in trenches? The T-62s are pretty vulnerable, but that’s why both sides are using them because they have them and won’t be losing anything if they get destroyed. It’s a win win for both sides to use older equipment
And UA side also use literally anything that has kind of armor (any old British and French stuff and now crying and willing to get some leopards 1 more) and use anything old and rusty to resupply they really high casualties and problems with their "mechanised" brigades (some of them already turned into fully infantry brigades). But UA side coping so hard and has a support from Western media, so that cope didn't noticed by many "non-political" youtubers and bloggers.
How in that meme said: "We're winnin'!"
No, since 2024 T-54/55s showed up in armored assault columns on numerous points specifically robotyne. The T-62s have shown up in attack columns all over the front but also make up a large percentage of the armor in Russian use in Kharkiv. One alternative uses found for T-62s with non functioning guns is their conversion into the infamous turtle tanks.
The T-62M1 at its own BR is so good, I just got to Russia 8.7 and I love it
T64A should be better at 9.0 it has autoloader stalinium turret and better speed.
@@nashaigra8973At the cost of no heavy machinegun, no LRF and 4kph reverse speed
@@ougioshino6940
it's still good xD
@@ougioshino6940 Reverse aint a problem there. you will play of the turret most of the time LRF is mostly useless unless ur a gayjin profitmaker premium LVL5 NOOB.
Russia is using the t-55s as artillery. They aren’t supposed to shoot other tanks. Just yeeting HE down range.
Imagine having to use T-55 as Artillery 💀
@@indeed169 i mean....
it must be working...
@@diverr69 oh has Russia finally actually made ANY progress at all?😂
@@jamesmcewan2011 yea
@jamesmcewan2011 not a ukrainian bot at all screaming "Slava Ukraine"
From what i understand the Russian forces are using the t55 as artillery, not as a frontline tank as you put it. It probably is very inaccurate but they have a lot of ammo, why not use them? They have enough of other tanks capable of going up against newer western tanks. They are churning out new T90s way faster than the west can, if im allowed to guess.
A thougth aswell on the use of old rounds. From what ive heard there hasnt been a lot of tank on tank combat and the tanks have mostly been firing heat or he, and the older ammo is still pretty capable against the tanks they have faced so far. Might aswell use it.
T-90s havent been seen on the front for half a year!
*gets the world's easiest kill ever*
Gaijin: yeah THAT was skill.
i think the russian using T-55 series tank in ukraine is proofven but its not use as a tank but a mobile altelery pieces, so its doesnt need APDSFS but it only need HE
but the APDSFS you see earlier is probably just a defence mecanism
It's none the less utterly pathetic for a supposed "military superpower".
Copium
No, they're not using T55 or T62s as MBTs. They're using them in the indirect fire role, essentially turning them into SPGs, as these old tanks still have sights for that purpose. They're also using them as IFVs and other random roles.
So they're still being used in combat, got it, thanks for confirming what we already knew
Its cause they have 100mm ammo but no trucks and shit. However trying to indirect fire in war thunder is, yeah
@@Legion617 did I say they're not or did I just explain not as MBTs but rather in other roles.
@@murmaider2 Yes you did, you said they're using them as IFVs. In most combat operations/doctrines, tanks should be used to support infantry, which is what IFVs also do, so they're essentially in combat operations by the comment you stated.
They aren't being used as MBTs. Theyre being used as mobile artillery with armor. Like a field gun essentially
With armor 💀
..... the T-62 are used as frontline tanks
@@indeed169 And the first leopards in Ukraine doesnt even saw a russian tank,but they got destroyed 😂😂😂
@@patriktoth3346 okay? And the end of the day its another tank. No one said they are indestructible. Its kinda cringe that you pro russian idiots have to milk this one destroyed Leopard 2A4 because there is no other significant military success since the counter offensive ended in october. Just a reminder that russia lost over 2000 tanks (confirmed by Oryx)
Ukrain vehicle losses : 3556 (includes tanks, ifvs etc)
Russian vehicle losses : 10593(includes tanks, ifvs etc)
But a destroyed Leopard is something special eh? 😂 Dumbass hore go on and celebrate but keep in mind that russia losses are 3-4 times higher.
@bolshevik1017 i'm 23 lol tf are you talking about...
@@indeed169 Prove it.
T-62 might be old, but as Chieftain said - even a T-54 can take out an Abrams from the side with a well placed shot. Maybe we could get the T-62 with thermals some day.
Well...... There are T-62's with thermals. There are in east Ukraine and used mostly by DPR and LPR. Although Russia uses them too.
@@bamboo7563 "DPR" , "LPR". Can't help but laugh everytime I hear that.
@@bamboo7563They are not used in frontlines, but as armored medium range artillery vehicle.
T-62 and T-55 are not used like MBT's but arty or self propeled gun sonthing like the m26 in korean war
Bro could get 13 kills and a nuke with the L3 and still call it "alright" and "not bad"
i think i wanted to correct you with is that no they are not using tanks from the 50's in the front lines, they are using them as artillery 90% of the time
The oldest modernised tanks that Russia is using are T 62
Can you do a video about the Leo1 and T55 at top tier facing T-80BVM like in Ukraine
or T55 against t80bvm
Or f16 vs is2 like it's gonna be soon
Or a t-55 facing a leopard 2a6 for example. lol
Hey Spook, you should play the Semovente 75/46 M43. It's a deeply overshadowed italian tank destroyer which can deliver an heavy punch but it's deeply ignored the potential it has.
(Day 38)
You were asking for it even since this video? God damn that's dedication.
lol@@ghostwinter3351
If you didn't know the reason why they are using the T-55 and t-54 because they have useful cannons that can be used for indirect fire like forward artillery in a way.
That and the fact the gun is in an armored turret makes it resistant to drone-dropped grenades. Unlike truck mounted guns.
@@Crosshair84 True people think they are using it to fight m1 abrams and leopards which if funny because those would be destroyed before they see actual tank combat. Probably destroying by a mine or air strike or a anti tank crew.
And everyone somehow "forget" how another blue-yellow side use literally anything, including many old garbage just to have any kind of armor (like old APCs, old Leaopards 1 and slovenian M-55S (literally T-55 with some ERA and british old gun).
The reason the SEP's ARAT didn't stop the APFSDS is because it's a western ERA in War Thunder.
if that was russian era it would've ricochet the shell back into the shooter and hit the ammo
It was really good on one of the dev serves then got nerfed to hell
They nerfed NATO ERA so bad, and they don’t even include ARAT 2 which is crescent shaped and not blocky shaped
ARAT never meant to stop Kinetic stop complaining about thing that not real, ARAT compose of a simple explosive charge with thin container
Actual ERA that mean to stop kinetic sit at far steeper angle and thicker plate
@@Aes880 So will super blazer be corrected then?
Russia uses older tanks for indirect fire support, i could be wrong tho every source says something else on this
you'[re correct, they're being used as SPGs but also being donated to LDNR troops who probably will use them as MBTs.
I love the clip at 2:08 which practically re-enact that one Abrams that tanks an RPG and immediately points the gun to the cameraman.
3:14 the state of shells right now is kinda sad, it doesn't matter if is HEAT or AP sometimes rounds just dont do any damage after pen.
Fighting against an M1A1, and you're worried about the reload rate? The T-62 will be lucky to see the other tank before it explodes.
You really do have the best editing. I love your armour history and explanation videos, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't enjoy these.
T-54’s and T-55’s won’t be used for tank combat but rather for indirect fire aka as a field artillery. Just for clarification
The T-55's are being used as makeshift artillery pieces, they likely will never see a NATO tank because of the new support role.
Also some of the T-55's are having their turrets switched out for a 57mm gun.
The T-64's are for the most part used by the DPR/LPR forces and I think Wagner as well but I think Wagner uses T-72's or T-80's.
It will be interesting to see how the Leo 2 and Abrams fair in this war.
If the wall of Kornets, Vikhr and drones don't get them, then the of Cruise missles will.
I think Wagner has T-90M aswell since there was a video of one in Bakhmut some time back
@@toni9456 Thanks for the info!
I wasn't 100% sure if they used the T-90M.
Like Chieftain Said in a Video from Forgotten weapons the ammo and the Gun (115mm) was never developed to its full potential
Spookston they are catually using the old tanks as artillery and infantry suport veicles, not for fighting tanks
I cant imagine what its like for these tankers going into combat without any thermals or modern-ish targeting systems. Fighting a war blind does not sound like fun
Fun? No, but at least they don’t get to blow up more kids
they are using them agaisnt infantry not for tank to tank combat. And if we are at using old MBTs ukraine got Slovenian M-55s (upgraded T-55) also there isn't much tank to tank combat so these old MBTs do very good in this war since it is cheaper to lose one (day 28 of asking)
The t55s are used for indirect fire cause of availability of ammo but not transport yet i think trying to do that in war thunder would be even worse
2:47 I swear it’s moments like this that bring me back to this cursed game
How does the little guy inside the turret throw open the hatch, chuck the hot shell casing out, and slam the hatch shut so quickly?
I think it's ejection is automated, it uses the gun's recoil to discard the spent shell.
I just watched a video the other day of Russian T-80 engaging Ukrainian T-64 at like 25m range, it was nuts. Very interesting seeing real life tank combat play out at video game ranges, although I really feel bad for those fellas that experienced a significant emotional event.
Also, your laugh is adorable and makes my day. Thanks for the upload.
there are few videos with tank-tank combat. if i'm right, Russian crews win majority of them but against T-64BV/Es driving T-80s so whatever.
@@raketny_hvost it isn’t the Russian tanks that the main issue, they work as they were intended to. Instead the large amount of modern AT weapons which are deadly for any tank.
@@finkamyash i was speaking about straight tank-tank duels
@@raketny_hvost yeah I accidentally replied to your comment mb
I hate to say it but saying stuff like "Russia is using tanks from the 50's as frontline MBTs" is actually just western propaganda. Why would anyone believe that they ran out of thousands of T-80s/90s so fast?
They're using T-62 tanks as fire support because they have plenty of shells for them, and unsurprisingly a 115mm HE shell does pretty well against infantry regardless if it was made in 1980, 1950, or even 1940. A KV-2 could still provide adequate fortification busting capabilities, let alone a more mobile and armored tank that can deal with other modern tanks from the side too.
Soviet tanks are cheap and it's quality poor. However they fulfill one important category that their NATO counterparts do not have. Availability.
For the price of an Abrams squadron, you can field 2-3 squadrons of T-62s, which is actually more useful a strategic level. You can cover more ground and provide more support for other units (especially infantry) on the battlefield.
When you're covering a 100km front, a poor tank is better than no tank at all.
NATO tanks are designed for armored supremacy and tank duels. But in the age of drones, live satellite intel feed, guided munitions, and readily available infantry AT weapons, superior armor just doesn't bring as much benefit to the table anymore (especially if used in the WW2 armored fist type of formation). A good example is Syria and Ukraine. Most armored losses there are caused by things other than other tanks armored vehicle. Tanks are now more effective as support units rather than standalone independent units.
The problem is that the whole "Russian tank costs less so it's cheaper" doesn't make sense because, as it turns out, Russia is poor. Having tanks and equipment that have price tags about 1/3 that of Western equivalents doesn't mean much when Russians also have salaries 5-7x smaller than American / NATO civilians.
Proportionally, Russia has to expend 1.5-2.3x more economic resources / output for just one (inferior) tank when compared to the likes of America.
@@ImBigFloppa The Russian ruble is worth less than the US dollar yea, but every person I've asked who's been in Russia or lives there says that their earnings are just fine and have money to spare. Which for US standards isn't much, but when your healthcare doesn't cost 20 paychecks and education isn't as expensive, Russia is just fine, despite being less rich than the west.
If it was "poor" simply because of these statistics then it wouldn't be one of the largest military forces in the world with one of the most modernized tanks like the T-72 being a part of basically every slavic nation's military. If I had to guess the reason they're struggling is because they are exactly trying to avoid a repeat of the casualties in WW2, they could probably just overwhelm Ukraine and be done with it but the cost of life, infrastructure damage, and overall nation morale is too high for such a large risk.
Would you rather have 10 good tanks? Or 100 shit tanks? Cause you have to think about logistics as well, the fuel, the ammo, the training, the men, the space needed to house all of that.
Numbers mean jack shit. Throughout history you will find smaller forces beating significantly larger forces.
@@XealotCoils Russia doesn't lack many of those things. Only lacking in this list are the logistics because of the sheer size of the nation and the training of younger soldiers, which does become a problem when you have a massive army, it's been shown to be an issue for Russia ever since the first world war.
Numbers mean everything if the leader is smart and doesn't only rely on them. A larger force is going to easily crush a smaller one if the leader doesn't do stupid shit and let the smaller one outmaneuver them and escape or flank
@@exoticdachoo007 Numbers don't mean everything. Cause if you're throwing in 10 times more men, material and power into a war, and you come out second best and barely squeaking by, then you've practically lost the battle materially.
Cause if you lose 100 tanks, you need to make 100 more. It's a lot easier and cheaper to make 10 tanks than it is to make 100.
Just relying on numbers to win wars is what gets you in the current situation. Like I fully doubt that the Russian generals and leaders are all stupid an inept at their job.
Russia should have won ages ago. But they haven't, why is that? They had everything on their side, men, material, tanks, vehicles, power. Everything Ukraine had, Russia had in spades. They even got to Kyiv ffs, but they've lost multiple battles since then.
Why isn't Russia crushing Ukraine? They've lost so much material that it's not funny. For an SMO, they've lost this war materially, they've expended more men and resources than the other side has.
This whole situation is fucked.
*Me casually waiting for Spooks to play ny requested vehicle*
Spooks, Play the XM-1 and MBT-70, Show the new kids that they don't need fancy new Freebrams
Wtf dude, frontline? Really? Like there are first-hand accounts that 62s and 55s and being assigned to Howitzer divisions and used as indirect fire weapons.
its funne how much is being brought up by this whole Ukraine thing yet America did fail 2 times against similar if not less equipped military groups *Vietnam Afghanistan*
Ah yes russia was so successful with the invasion of Afghanistan. And the US job was to train the ANA and stabilize the region..the ANA was trained and the region stabilized and in 20 years usa lost like 1000 people while russia lost that in less than a week.
@@KingSpittusFactus ah yess i suppose vietnam to then what was it 7M troops sent over and u lost to what was almost 1M nva troops
The Obj 685 barely gets attention for a light tank with potential.
I really would love for spookston to play it Once just once.
no offense but they aren't using them as MBT's at all lol
There have been frontline sightings of t62s and a t55 was captured a week ago
@@aadendemers2857 Does not mean that they are used as MBT's.
@@paavali1896 is that why they upgraded them with thermal sights 😭
@@aadendemers2857 I would guess having thermals would increase their usefulness as mobile protected firepower
@@paavali1896 that’s why they used them in adults near arkavia ( idk how to spell Ukrainian names)
T55 and 54 are not in use by Russias military but separatist divisions. They dont use it in tank v tank fights but rather just as infantry support. So that intro could use at least crumble of informations
Most of the vehicles Ukraine uses is outdated armored cars, apcs and MRAPs. About 100 T-90Ms are produced monthly and that's before you'll acount for other vehicles.
So it's less about fielding T-54/55/62 against other tanks and more about having one more SPG to kill stuff and spend outdated ammo.
That's why you see 23mm cannons, 57mm oldies, 30mm autocannons on everything, all sorts of mortars and daily ammo spendings that cover combined weekly NATO manufacturing output.
About 100 t-90m are produced monthly lol, and people still falls for the propaganda numbers claim by the russian MOD. 🤣🤣
To be fair, Russia isn’t using t-54s for frontline service but instead for indirect supporting fire. But it’s still sad there using it on the modern battlefield
As much as I love Ryan Macbeth I think he still gives russia 2 much credit
the experience with the amazing mobility of T-62M-1 has clearly prepared you to play the Chieftain (any variant).
Please make a video about the ST-A3, it's my favourite tank in War Thunder
Spookston on his way to demonstrate how the Russian military is running out of ammunition constantly
Tank v tank combat may not exactly be what we all envision it to be with these comparisons. Especially when aerial superiority comes into play. It’s at least interesting to play into the “what if” of things when it’s Spookston at the keyboard.
0:10 ❌❌ Wrong. T-62s and T-64s are mainly used by the LPR and DPR militias. The Russian Armed Forces only use captured T-64s in their ranks, thats why lots of T-64s in Russian service are of the ‘Bulat’ modification. The T-55s are not front line infantry/tank fighting vehicles, they are used as indirect fire SPGs, they are used like this die to the apparent huge surplus of 100mm HE rounds, these ‘Tanks’ now ‘SPGs’ have a crew of 3 instead of 4, this is due to the lack of a need for a commander. Some T-55s have even had their turrets removed and used as armoured recovery vehicles or a 57mm autocannon put in place.
he right tho
7:08 the tank evaporated
I hope the poor conscripts thrown into T-54/55s and T-62s really never have to face off against actual armor. Even more so I hope this war ends.
It's not to many tank battles in Ukraine
Yeah, most are dying to air on both ends.
@@DIEGhostfish Those aint used as tanks its mobile artillery. All (most of tanks) are used like that in current state of conflict
I mean there's a legitimate chance Russian conscripts with T-62M-1 and T55AM-1 face off against Ukrainian conscripts in Leo 1s and T-55S, in which case Russians may have an advantage. But for real, tank to tank battles have proven to be very rare in this war.
Don't worry, AFU 47th airborne Bde with it's brand new slovenian M-55S is expected to be in the first echelon of the UA counteroffensive
They are using 50's tanks as spgs not frontline mbts
Apparently Russia is now attaching their cheap domestically produced thermals onto these to try to make them slightly less vulnerable by improving their odds of spotting and shooting first.
_gaijin pls thermals T-62M_
why isnt this 11.7 yet? its being used in a modern conflict
The hilarity of that BM-31-12 rushing the M1A1 AIM, and actually managing to kill him! 😂
Jagdpanther? Can you please play that?
2:10 The pure terror as the turret turn slowly towards you ☠☠
So glad spook is finally playing mobik simulator. Next episode he'll be in the 17th assault wave trying to take a single building in Bakhmut
[3:53] Spookston: Please, be dis-track-ted.
Gaijin: Alright!
This didn't age well.
Fr
Why?
yeah, i've seen at least 1 photo with a IS-3 being used by the Vatniks
@@kekkoinen There is no such photo wtf are you talking about?
It aged like spoilt milk fr
This is exactly how it feels to fight t-80bvms in Leopards and Abrams
really love the patented Spookston 'ah' when ever something unfortunate happens
This video reminds me of when my 75 mm cannon cannot pen a 3mm max armor enemy
For how sub par this thing is at its own br (mainly because of uptiers) i like it, it probably one of my top 10 tanks
Fun fact: given current conditions, a properly deployed BM-31-12 would've been an excellent weapon.
A lot of people tend to forget that only a few dozen old, derelict Leopards and Abrams are being sent
Ukraine's entire tank fleet is barely modernized T-64s and whatever unmaintained T-72s countries like Poland donated. It's not like they're getting 6000 2A7s like a HOI4 MD game 🤷♂
Yea I wouldn't trust info from a guy with a pfp of Putin
Cool
3:14 is that a smiley face by spall?😂
Top tip - you can hold left Ctrl and interact with the map. Saves some time and screen space when placing pings
You should try the type 16fps, from what i heard it's pretty busted and should go up in the br, would love to see your opinion
I feel like people only think it’s a problem bc they can pay for an 8.7 with a subpar dart but with Gen 3 thermals instead of having to grind through Japan to get it, which just added to the premium black hole at that BR. Don’t remember anyone complaining about the Type 16(P) when it was added to the TT.
Would love to see spooky play Ariete. An MBT which at least on paper is something to his taste.
I mean I can agree it's pain but I personally love both the normal and M variant of the t 62 I really never have bad experiences with them.
I just wish the normal t62 had a roof machinegun. I think I will replace it with the 435 since I don't have extra crew slots
Made it into one of your videos makes me happy even tho I destroyed your breach manytimesthat fulda match at beginning of the video XD
me who took a T-55AM 1 to 9.7: yeah.. that thing still works!
It’s nice to see spookston suffering for our pleasure but let’s take a moment to realize that bm-31-12 at 2:48 killed the freebrams but I’ve been seeing that truck at top tier all the time it’s funny to see and it’s kinda sad I can’t get it but to everyone who does have it I hope you have lots of fun in the future.
For all those who believe these are meant to face other MBTS, that is quite incorrect. Russia has been using them as more or less defense / assault tanks against infantry. Although they have been upgraded with a gen 2 thermal viewer, that is a last resort for them to engage in MBT on MBT combat.
As for the T55s, artillery crews have been retrained to use these arty guns with armor, as it’s the last Russian tank that actually had that in the manual of operations, however they’re trained to do it in most mbts.
Not *meant* to, but still may if they're close to the front, though most armor kills are from the air these days.
@@DIEGhostfish air or arty lol
@@uniquescorpions4802 True, though arty's usually air-spotted these days.
I've noticed that the 115mm guns have been doing less dmg from before. Didn't help the T62M1 got a reload nerf a while back.
David is a gigachad for using the Katyusha
you forgot to add the part where it spontaneously combusts after reaching the battlefield
Seems this video attracted the russian bots lmao