Love watching you play because it is relaxing just to watch. Not so stressful to see units miss like 80% of their missiles when they are not yours lol.
One hell of a grind at the start of this, those T55s really turned the tide though and the RM70s were the MVPs for sure. Big props to Grimguy too for his support, those mortars combined with his infantry did quite a lot of work.
I'd be interested to see a reverse of this game: same map, but switch sides and play the same zones and divisions as your opponent in this game. It'd be good to see how you cope with the MLRS spam. MLRS feel like low-effort, low-cooldown board flips that wipe infantry and make even the most expensive tanks instantly useless with cohesion loss. I get that some divisions need to rely on it more than others, but I'm not having fun playing against that whatsoever.
15:11 - No, the RPO is *not* a napalm launcher. It's not really an incendiary, it's just called that due to a quirk of ruSSian military labelling. It's a thermobaric weapon. It's the massive shockwave it generates that kills unprotected infantry, not burning. In fact Thermobarics set less fires than normal explosives as they consume all the oxygen.
Месяц назад+4
You are both wrong and right as far as I can tell. The first version of RPO ("rys") was using some sort of napalm, the RPO-A used by the unit here use a thermobaric warhead but there are also a napalm version of the same weapon (as far as I have seen, the RPO-Z is the same weapon with a different warhead). So yeah, this instance would be thermobaric but all weapons named RPO are not the same and there are napalm weapons with that name.
man, I was longing for content like this - its been ages
It's been 4 days :(
@@VulcanHDGaming and how long before that ?!
@@VulcanHDGaming Everyday you're gone is like an eternity...
@@VulcanHDGaming Feels longer.
@TheInfamousMrFox you can't rush greatness
Love watching you play because it is relaxing just to watch. Not so stressful to see units miss like 80% of their missiles when they are not yours lol.
Wait, it was actually a match where I did reasonably ok.
As always, love your Warno content:)
This was a very fun match lol
@@grimguy7905 it was!
I actually used your advice to be more aggressive with forward deployment and it worked.
@@tommysalty5864 nice
One hell of a grind at the start of this, those T55s really turned the tide though and the RM70s were the MVPs for sure.
Big props to Grimguy too for his support, those mortars combined with his infantry did quite a lot of work.
I'd be interested to see a reverse of this game: same map, but switch sides and play the same zones and divisions as your opponent in this game. It'd be good to see how you cope with the MLRS spam. MLRS feel like low-effort, low-cooldown board flips that wipe infantry and make even the most expensive tanks instantly useless with cohesion loss. I get that some divisions need to rely on it more than others, but I'm not having fun playing against that whatsoever.
just use the sound bug/engine to fight back
15:11 - No, the RPO is *not* a napalm launcher. It's not really an incendiary, it's just called that due to a quirk of ruSSian military labelling.
It's a thermobaric weapon.
It's the massive shockwave it generates that kills unprotected infantry, not burning. In fact Thermobarics set less fires than normal explosives as they consume all the oxygen.
You are both wrong and right as far as I can tell. The first version of RPO ("rys") was using some sort of napalm, the RPO-A used by the unit here use a thermobaric warhead but there are also a napalm version of the same weapon (as far as I have seen, the RPO-Z is the same weapon with a different warhead). So yeah, this instance would be thermobaric but all weapons named RPO are not the same and there are napalm weapons with that name.
0:03 ngl it sounded more like Balkan then Vulcan 😂
Is this the same grimmguy as the one from Advance Wars By Web?
Buh!