That one mission in 2017’s WW2 where you chase around a tank, with a tank, had me deleting the game. Makes me think they would’ve done something like that again
It would be nice if they did a Pacific campaign for once, WaW did a solid one. There are plenty of untold stories like battle of Shanghai, battle of Manila, burma etc
@@Sal-zs1ob it's not about the person who died, it's about experiencing that shock the devs intended the player to experience. IGN showing it in the first second of the video completely nullifies this.
No. we buy the game for campaign, multiplayer, zombies or whatever third thing they have included. If you're only buying cod for the campaign, then that's just sad and a waste of money
Yes, but too bad the gameplay is devolving.... Most games are just kinda boring nowadays... At least id software is still going strong with their new dooms!
Aye this question is for anyone at IGN. Why is COD one of the only games that you review in different sections/videos like this?? Many games have multiple modes and various content, yet get rated as a whole. Why does COD get separate videos for each mode? It’s be one thing if each game is done this way but To me it seems a little ridiculous to only do this for COD. I’m genuinely curious.
COD is one of the most popular mainstream games there is. Yeah it’s been on the downfall a bit and has been getting a lot of hate lately but COD is still insanely popular. COD reviews get a lot of views.
Not only COD. They did separate reviews for the single player and multiplayer component of Battlefield V. Same with Iron Harvest, Star Wars: Squadrons, Doom Eternal, and Gears 5. I forgot, separate reviews for Red Dead Redemption 2 and Red Dead Online also.
How people still give 60 $ for 5 hours campaign game is beyond crazy for me, when you look at how other games have evolved but they still release same bulsit every year. They need to start making games bigger not just adding multyplayer and zombies mode every time. They change the setting for game give some cool cutscenes and people hope this is going to be different.
These games are heavily multiplayer focused. The fact it has an amazing cinematic campaign is a bonus. There’s other games out there for you, this isn’t the one for you.
Going out to the movies is like 20 bucks minimum, and that is for a viewing experience around 2 hours that you only get to enjoy once. 60 dollars for a 5 hour game plus 100s of hours of entertainment in multiplayer is worth the money. Now comparing this relatively barebones offering to something like Grand Theft Auto- yeah it doesn't make sense how both these games cost the same amount.
It's just like anything else. Shoot a bunch of people and go from point A to point B... It seems like people never have any new ideas for these damn games
Well,it's a shooting game so expect more of it rather then puzzle solving or using brain cells which kids definitely don't want to use so why developers will bother...?
It’s either repetitive & lengthy missions, or cinematic & immersive short missions. Campaign is great, but still haven’t reached “World at War” great. It covers more fronts than the 2017’s CoD WWII, but shorter.
@@David-mg5jx People bought single-player games for $60 back in the 2000s, some are short and some are bad too so It's not weird. Multiplayer is just a bonus, even to this day.
We could've had a second no Russian level with losing that driver and then Pattons fateful drive to go peasant hunting. And we could've pointed an early finger at the REAL culprit before those JFK files tell a sordid tale.
Makes me sad a little bit but it's fact, well Above and Beyond is in VR which is inaccessible to a lot of people, hopefully EA gives Respawn or someone else another chance
@@abrams2162 Sadly, Day 1 review regarding only the Campaign/SP for games that are primarily bought for their MP, has been a worrying trend over the past couple of years!
Imagine if call of duty had a 3-5 year cycle in between releases. Or if they made multiplayer second built around the campaign rather than the campaign built around the multiplayer
1:10 actually according to the ranks on their uniforms Freisinger is a lieutenant and Richter is a Captain, which is weird because that would make Richter a Freisinger's superior.
The SS are absolutely all over the place in this, to name a few discrepancies; Richter is a Hauptsturmfuhrer (Captain) and reports to an Untersturmfuhrer (Lieutenant) Freisinger for some reason. They are not high ranks. Also, the uniforms have no consistency, the SS collar tabs on both of their uniforms are different shapes and sizes, Richter's uniform makes him look more like a vicar than an officer of the Waffen-SS (SD/Sicherheitsdienst). Freisinger's (black) uniform looks better for the Allgemeine SS. This just scratches the surface of the complete 'historical' chaos going on with this game.
bingo!@ I am a collector...uniforms and insignia is what I do and it completely ruins the game for me because a medium grade collector could do that for pennies.
@@CashSoprano no call of duty has been worth buying just for the single player, it has always been a braindead enemy shooting gallery. besides ign, no one actually prasie the single player.
@@josephmoore9706 Majority of FPS games has braindead AI, only FEAR that did exceptionally well. While the gameplay of any CoD isn't anything extraordinary, people in fact love the story and cutscenes in these games.
A black commanding officer in WWII? I'm all for inclusivity and equal rights but does it really have to come at the cost of authenticity and historical accuracy??
"small group of people" How about we get large battles like in old call of duty games where you feel like one of the many infantry in combat? Sounds boring af
If they wanted to tell a story about the formation of the world's first special forces why didn't they just tell the story of the SAS in the second world war?
Just to show that a series as COD that used to get 9 and 10s from everyone, is hugely affected by this yearly release stuff. Now they cannot manage to get higher than 7. Shameful
The campaign is nice to look at and is fun but it doesn't have a lot of badass moments that make a call of duty game and is not entirely historically equally accurate at some parts. So my vote 5/10
@@max11111able no definitely not, in WW2 u feel hooked in as u feel like ur there as u progress through Europe. but vanguard just feels like ur playing little snippets of different parts of the war and u just don’t feel like much progression is going on.
It probably has the most badass moments of any COD Game tbh, the scale of the battles were the biggest of any COD game thus far. And wa was your arcade fps shooter isn't historically accurate. War is hell, a video game doesn't need to be.
Just finished the campaign, but it just didn't really have any memorable moments. The only one kind of being the Lady Nightingale mission where at the end where it's kind of like a horror game. It was not that captivating with the characters lines and was pretty expected and cheesy.
IGN if you're gonna review each part of this game on it's own, you are saying that it will hold up on it's own, 5 hours for a game this expensive, you should have more criticism for
A bit disappointing that Canadian soldiers don’t get representation, as the devils brigade was a Canadian led squad that inglorious basterds is based on
It wasn’t Canadian ‘led’ though, Lt. Colonel Robert T. Frederick was an American leading the joint American and Canadian Devils Brigade organized under command of the United States Fifth Army in 1942.
Looks like it's straight to multi-player for me. Enjoy your spirited romp that teaches absolutely squat about the real thing. The battle of midway which the reviewer didn't like, is the closest you get.
That’s so clever. You really called out IGN, even though the review was fairly critical of the game, and it scored a 7. What’s the point to your comment, other than parroting what you’ve read from others in the past. Keep repeating buzzwords and out of place insults to make yourself look smart and current.
I’m kind of confused about the likes and dislikes. It seems people were split into hoping ign gives it a poor review or an absolutely great one. Either way they wouldn’t win with gamers now lmfaoo
The female russian seems like the most interesting part of the single player. Should've dedicated the entire campaign to her story. Could've been even better and longer.
@@micblades1117 Propaganda or not, there were 309 less Nazis because of her. Service as Sniper was June 1941 - June 1942. 309 kills in 1 year seems like one hell of a killstreak. Her name was Lyudmila Pavlichenko. 🖖🏼
Not being able to drive a tank in one of the biggest tank battles of WWII is definitely a legitimate criticism.
That one mission in 2017’s WW2 where you chase around a tank, with a tank, had me deleting the game. Makes me think they would’ve done something like that again
eh not really. you can just experienced as infantry
Tank missions were always a treat in CoD games.
This entire game is rushed, what did you expect?
Atleast they gave us the plane mission
It would be nice if they did a Pacific campaign for once, WaW did a solid one. There are plenty of untold stories like battle of Shanghai, battle of Manila, burma etc
WaW was my first cod game 😔
political correct issues, China cannot be portrayed as the justice side by usa games
@@frankhu8692 but China was the KMT's NRA at the time surely there wouldn't be any problems
@@Noacuracy that being said, the other side also fought heavily, why should we ignore them
"for once" goes on to list a time where that was done.
Starting out with an immediate spoiler.
IGN ladies and gentlemen.
Usually gamespot spoil the games with their reviews
@@cole9693 They will spoil another moment I'm sure.
How dare they spoil the death of an npc
@@Sal-zs1ob it's not about the person who died, it's about experiencing that shock the devs intended the player to experience. IGN showing it in the first second of the video completely nullifies this.
how so??? the fact that they said the first mission is on a train???
"It's about a guard with a van or something. 7/10" -IGN
Lmfaoo
Underrated comment😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🙏🏾
🤣🤣🤣🤣
"4/10, there was candy in that van" IGN
"It really makes you feel like you are shooting people, and has nothing to do with guarding a van, cuz they hadn't been made yet." 7/10 - IGN
gave me a chuckle
I’m pretty sure you can drive a tank in battlefield though
That is literally where the word Vanguard comes from
ofc there were vans
This sounds extremely Philomena Cunk. Hahaha
Campaigns that short IGN literally spoiled it for everyone with this 5min gameplay 🤣
same thought
Spoiled in 10 seconds
I'm done it
wait, is this the lowest rated ign review on cod, ever? It got lower than infinite warfare which is a suprise
Who cares? It’s not worth playing lol
The single player campaign should be available to purchase separate from the multiplayer.
yes，that will be great
Like people would even consider it exists or anything.
What?
No. we buy the game for campaign, multiplayer, zombies or whatever third thing they have included. If you're only buying cod for the campaign, then that's just sad and a waste of money
@@chaosiscoming9184 That’s why they say it should be available to purchase it separately…
Graphics are getting so insane man it’s crazy. Grew up with the n64 never thought I’d see the day
Hell yea goldeneye perfect dark no mercy
Yes, but too bad the gameplay is devolving....
Most games are just kinda boring nowadays...
At least id software is still going strong with their new dooms!
N64 is the best console of all time hands down
imagine me that grew up playing ZX Spectrum!!!
@@BSparksGaming obviously isnt
So the video is longer than the actual campaign?
Seems like it
The campaign was 5+ hours
@@uppercutgrandma4425 It's a joke bro
@@uppercutgrandma4425 r/woooosh
@@uppercutgrandma4425 Keep up Grandma.
I'll wait for a price-cut before buying for the Campaign only. Can't be bothered with online multiplayer these days.
Still gotta install the full gb size which is ridiculous to play only the single player campaign
agreed, multiplayer is the ruin of gaming, and im so over the battle royale garbage
Or you should, you know, pirate it?! At this point Activision doesn't deserve your money.
multiplayer is the only reason to play games
@@tiktokexposed898 no
"There's not a single mission where you have to guard the van, Shame!" - 7/10 IGN
Hahahaha.. you’ve got the 7/10 perfect .. seems to be a yearly trend
Aye this question is for anyone at IGN. Why is COD one of the only games that you review in different sections/videos like this?? Many games have multiple modes and various content, yet get rated as a whole. Why does COD get separate videos for each mode? It’s be one thing if each game is done this way but To me it seems a little ridiculous to only do this for COD. I’m genuinely curious.
COD is one of the most popular mainstream games there is. Yeah it’s been on the downfall a bit and has been getting a lot of hate lately but COD is still insanely popular. COD reviews get a lot of views.
$$$💵
Not only COD. They did separate reviews for the single player and multiplayer component of Battlefield V. Same with Iron Harvest, Star Wars: Squadrons, Doom Eternal, and Gears 5. I forgot, separate reviews for Red Dead Redemption 2 and Red Dead Online also.
Because IGN is a joke
Your trippin they do seperate reviews for alot of games with multiplayer
Next year's game will have a 3 hour campaign.
How long was it???
@Aranjit Singh Which is how many missions? 7?
@Aranjit Singh Just 4 hours????
@Aranjit Singh no it’s 5 hours
@@mrplayfulshade for me it was about 6 hours
“… while dancing the Christoph Waltz.” Nicely done, Cardy. Very nice.
Also impressive, to me at least: Sole credit goes to Cardy, which means he not only narrates the video, he wrote the review and edited the video too.
it would be nice if they make a long story mode .
Visuals look amazing. Will have to wait for a while until it’s on sale…
@RTX 3090 ON the early ones certainly were. Irrespective of whether that holds true or not today, the visuals certainly look very impressive.
Agreed
idk, they don't look any better or worse than MW 2019 imo. The only reason they look amazing is because Cold War was 2 steps backwards graphically
200 steps
You will NEVER find an Activision/COD game under $20 on sale in any digital store or any retailer without it being severely used and old
Activision should sell campaign only versions of all CoD games for a lower price. Profit.
There's lot of engineering talent in WEPONARY that's used in multiplayer as well... Not just Graphics
This is a great idea and i'd be a buyer.
How people still give 60 $ for 5 hours campaign game is beyond crazy for me, when you look at how other games have evolved but they still release same bulsit every year. They need to start making games bigger not just adding multyplayer and zombies mode every time. They change the setting for game give some cool cutscenes and people hope this is going to be different.
5 hours + infinite Zombies and Multiplayer hours it makes sense imo
These games are heavily multiplayer focused. The fact it has an amazing cinematic campaign is a bonus. There’s other games out there for you, this isn’t the one for you.
@@yuutasai5626 im hearin reports of the worst zombies mode ever
Going out to the movies is like 20 bucks minimum, and that is for a viewing experience around 2 hours that you only get to enjoy once.
60 dollars for a 5 hour game plus 100s of hours of entertainment in multiplayer is worth the money. Now comparing this relatively barebones offering to something like Grand Theft Auto- yeah it doesn't make sense how both these games cost the same amount.
You think that's crazy? They still charge $20 *on sale* for their 10+ year old games with no DLC included.
The refusal to give CoD anything lower than a 7 is why no one takes gaming journalists serious.
spot on!
Game in not bad at all its just uninspiring.
Looks pretty Epic to me
Then stop watching
But they gave Cold War and Vanguard's multiplayer modes a 6?
Aka cod being cod. You guys are being too soft here
"It really makes you feel like you are feeling something that feels like playing a video game" 7/10 - IGN
Ha ha! That made me laugh so hard! Nice one! 🤣
That was SO funny ... but so true!
Guess you've been learning from Dunkey.
It's just like anything else. Shoot a bunch of people and go from point A to point B... It seems like people never have any new ideas for these damn games
Why would they need new ideas if the ones they had still profitable for them. 😄
Watchu think this is? Nintendo?
Well,it's a shooting game so expect more of it rather then puzzle solving or using brain cells which kids definitely don't want to use so why developers will bother...?
Ye but then the new zombies is very different and people are hating it and just want the old fprmula. So your damned if you do or don't.
It's what works best for single player linear games like this. What needs to be done differently is what we do in the middle of the process.
This is as close as I'll get to playing it.
Honestly if Vanguard goes on a sle for 10$ go buy it .The campaign is definitely worth purchasing and I've been playing COD since Original
"A fascist Elton John" is the kind of analogy you can only have in gaming.
Would be awesome to hear german version of his songs like in Wolfenstein
Except the Nazis were National Socialists, not Fascists.
Not an analogy
@@albondeb3364 you must be fun at parties
@@tom120ali Literally a farse and the definition of fascism. You only do what we want you to do and only like what we want you to like.
The graphics during the cutscenes are really stunning.
Cuz that my friend is cgi
@Jesus Pernia it feels a little like MW. Which is a plus for me
@@IsthatJosh isn't video game gameplay technically cgi
@@IsthatJosh what else would it be? lol
It’s either repetitive & lengthy missions, or cinematic & immersive short missions.
Campaign is great, but still haven’t reached “World at War” great. It covers more fronts than the 2017’s CoD WWII, but shorter.
But understand that Sledgehammer games is an entirely different group of people .Even Treyarch's Black Ops Series didn't capture what World at War.
Agreed
@@ChandranPrema123 Black Ops 1 is cool tho.
This review is almost as long as the campaign
Man the cutscenes look so nice. Honeslty in a few years it would be great if they released a collection of a bunch of cod campaigns, would be cool.
Their literally CG cutscenes not in-game cutscenes
You know what would be nice? Less cutscenes and more game.
They need to stop making a cod every year and just make one every few years that prioritize quality over quantity.
@@sterlingwirth7931 they are in-game Game Engine CGI+Pre Rendered For Cutscene.
@@EndomouEnd They’re made by 3 different studios, each getting 3 years to develop them… they don’t need to take a break.
I'll buy this game eventually for the campaign. Even some of the bad WW2 campaigns I've still really enjoyed
Yeah, can't complain about the campaign..
You'll buy this game for $50 for 6 hours of gameplay?
More power to you.
@@David-mg5jx yes people actually buy call of duty games for campaign only…I’m not a fan of online gameplay.
@@David-mg5jx People bought single-player games for $60 back in the 2000s, some are short and some are bad too so It's not weird.
Multiplayer is just a bonus, even to this day.
Its so linear . You can't go 1 metre off the line or it asks you to come back . One of the worst cod campaigns in years
Wdym linear? Cod games are always like that.
That’s every cod game ever
Its Weird To See STG44 with Scope and MG42 On Pasific War.
Did the japan get Weapon from German ?
How tf did this get a better rating than mw2
This got a 7. MW22 got a 6.
I swear IGN do these reviews terribly for the joke
please buy it on sale, do not support half arsed games ;)
Agreed
Don’t buy it all all and wait when you get it for free on ps+
@@sandileminke403 that could be years...
Wdym half arsed? We're getting more content with vanguard then modern warfare 2019 or cold war.
@@llluminatixx7 yeah, In Multiplayer, Not In Campaign.
We could've had a second no Russian level with losing that driver and then Pattons fateful drive to go peasant hunting. And we could've pointed an early finger at the REAL culprit before those JFK files tell a sordid tale.
That’s not going to happen with the cancel culture now.
Medal of Honor still had the best WWII campaigns.
Guess this'll work since those games are dead.
Makes me sad a little bit but it's fact, well Above and Beyond is in VR which is inaccessible to a lot of people, hopefully EA gives Respawn or someone else another chance
Well, there's World at war..
Call of duty 1 and 2 are better than medal of honor.
This is a filler cod until MW2 come out.
Pretty much this.
Waiting for mw2 (2022) myself haha I’ll save myself the money this year
Til Cold War 2 for me
@@bloodswan Cold War was terrible. MW is mountains above any recent CoD.
Lol... COD is the only game that gets treated with a separate review for each gamemode by IGN. Lol.
Nope, they did it with Gears 5, and will be doing the same with Halo Infinite.
What about battlefield
@@abrams2162 Sadly, Day 1 review regarding only the Campaign/SP for games that are primarily bought for their MP, has been a worrying trend over the past couple of years!
@@brycewarren2536 That's right! This type of review was done for Battlefield 3.
Imagine if call of duty had a 3-5 year cycle in between releases. Or if they made multiplayer second built around the campaign rather than the campaign built around the multiplayer
1:10 actually according to the ranks on their uniforms Freisinger is a lieutenant and Richter is a Captain, which is weird because that would make Richter a Freisinger's superior.
But one is a Gestapo and one is SS
Wolfenstein was much better years ago, and they werent afraid to show the swastika. This is a game for children.
Why you even watching bro
This game has swastikas in its campaign too though?
5 hours?? Wtf I’m tired of these small campaigns
This game makes you feeeeell like you've been called for duty....
The SS are absolutely all over the place in this, to name a few discrepancies; Richter is a Hauptsturmfuhrer (Captain) and reports to an Untersturmfuhrer (Lieutenant) Freisinger for some reason. They are not high ranks. Also, the uniforms have no consistency, the SS collar tabs on both of their uniforms are different shapes and sizes, Richter's uniform makes him look more like a vicar than an officer of the Waffen-SS (SD/Sicherheitsdienst). Freisinger's (black) uniform looks better for the Allgemeine SS. This just scratches the surface of the complete 'historical' chaos going on with this game.
Stop being weird
bingo!@ I am a collector...uniforms and insignia is what I do and it completely ruins the game for me because a medium grade collector could do that for pennies.
The graphics in this game look incredible!
@@VectorGhost troll
@@VectorGhost Grow up and learn to give credit when it’s due. You’re not edgy for being a sheep and hating on everything cod related.
no they dont, look average
Graphics are amazing on sereis x. I'm really enjoying the campaign. 7/10 is harsh
@@BVA07 u probably have a ps4 pro and u expect it to be in 4k
Quick Review: Don't buy it
COD WORLD AT WAR ( 2008 ) HAS A BEST CAMPAIGN.
Agreed, For me WAW was the best COD narrowly beating COD 2.
Looks like the same braindead enemy shooting gallery it always is.
Yea. Thats why all of the call of duty campaigns are praised for its single players
@@CashSoprano no call of duty has been worth buying just for the single player, it has always been a braindead enemy shooting gallery. besides ign, no one actually prasie the single player.
@@josephmoore9706 the older ones were great
@@josephmoore9706 mw2, black ops 2, and maybe advanced warfare had great campaigns.
@@josephmoore9706 Majority of FPS games has braindead AI, only FEAR that did exceptionally well.
While the gameplay of any CoD isn't anything extraordinary, people in fact love the story and cutscenes in these games.
IGN - hates COD games taking risks and wishes they stick to more traditional gameplay.
Also IGN - "there were missed opportunities to takes risks"
This problem not just With Ign But gamers in General.
Can you hear the toilet flush?
" it has nothing to do with Vanguard Cardfight, 7/10" ~IGN
It's cardfight vanguard
@@vitadude5004 ok
The single player campaign should be available to purchase separate from the multiplayer. (Repost)
This probably the worst cod campaign I’ve played. The writing is atrociously bad
Wrong
A black commanding officer in WWII?
I'm all for inclusivity and equal rights but does it really have to come at the cost of authenticity and historical accuracy??
It's based loosely on a real WW2 combatant you are aware? Just like all of the main squad members in Vanguard for that matter.
@@gamerinatrance3618very, very loosley based on the real counterparts
Since when has any cod been authentic? Infinite warfare had you fighting on Mars lmao
Man in certain lighting this game is nearly indistinguishable from a movie. that's some insane level of visual detail.
It seemed like this dude hated most of the campaign and still gave a 7/10?
That’s IGN for you.
They baby on call of duty everything else 0/10
"small group of people"
How about we get large battles like in old call of duty games where you feel like one of the many infantry in combat? Sounds boring af
Exactly like 5 or 6 people going against en entire german army? No way they all didnt die at that point it all had to be luck
Most underrated campaigns im not even trollin
Then u got a bad taste in campaigns
@@coltonbarnes7861not at all it’s not even bad don’t understand tha hate
7: The Magic Number.
At least it has one, right Battlefield?
Why they didn't do a Wolfenstein "alternative" style WW2 inspired game idk.
I'm fairness, that's probably cause the Zombies modes have already done something similar ever since WaW.
It'd be interesting if one day Call of Duty featured a sympathetic German main protagonist.
If they wanted to tell a story about the formation of the world's first special forces why didn't they just tell the story of the SAS in the second world war?
They gave this a 7 but gave MW2022 a 6.
Truly ign has given some sort of crack to their workers.
At least this is getting a Single Player campaign
what😂
@@MtpMuzik he is probably referring to the fact that Battliefield has no single player content
@@spikepsych and probably comparing it to black ops 4
It would be nice if they chose another actress instead of Laura Bailey - there are dozens of actresses who could probably do a better job.
This gets a 7 but mw2 gets a 6?!? Wtf Ign
Man..cod never disappoints with their campaign..even though it's not even close to realism... It always capture and entertain people playing it....
Yea it does
entertain if you mean comedy.
Ok so, this gets a 7 but mw2 gets a 6?
But...
Does it make you feel like you're a WW2 soldier?
Just to show that a series as COD that used to get 9 and 10s from everyone, is hugely affected by this yearly release stuff. Now they cannot manage to get higher than 7. Shameful
The campaign is nice to look at and is fun but it doesn't have a lot of badass moments that make a call of duty game and is not entirely historically equally accurate at some parts. So my vote 5/10
Is it better than COD WW2?
@@max11111able no definitely not, in WW2 u feel hooked in as u feel like ur there as u progress through Europe. but vanguard just feels like ur playing little snippets of different parts of the war and u just don’t feel like much progression is going on.
It probably has the most badass moments of any COD Game tbh, the scale of the battles were the biggest of any COD game thus far. And wa was your arcade fps shooter isn't historically accurate. War is hell, a video game doesn't need to be.
Do we have to download 100s of gb even after buying the physical disc?
Yeah
Great review thank you. Just bought the game and loading it up now .
Main question is how long campaign does long last?...4 - 5 hours that's it
Just finished the campaign, but it just didn't really have any memorable moments. The only one kind of being the Lady Nightingale mission where at the end where it's kind of like a horror game. It was not that captivating with the characters lines and was pretty expected and cheesy.
Graphics look amazing.
They are too afraid to give it anything lower than a 7 because they know who puts food on their plate.
Love how the scopes become see-through when you’re about to look through them
Cod Ghosts had that in 2013
You just know Dom Monaghan's interview prank on Elijah Wood all those years ago got him this gig :D
IGN if you're gonna review each part of this game on it's own, you are saying that it will hold up on it's own, 5 hours for a game this expensive, you should have more criticism for
Game’s so short that there ain’t much to criticise ahahah
What music tracks are used at 0:06 and 6:02? They sound great!
A bit disappointing that Canadian soldiers don’t get representation, as the devils brigade was a Canadian led squad that inglorious basterds is based on
Yeah nobody really cares about the canadian soldiers from ww2 these days
Better than New Zealand the person they took inspiration from for the aussie character is one of the most famous New Zealander Charles Upham
It wasn’t Canadian ‘led’ though, Lt. Colonel Robert T. Frederick was an American leading the joint American and Canadian Devils Brigade organized under command of the United States Fifth Army in 1942.
Say what you want. But the visuals in the game are amazing.
Mw better
Listens to reviewer: "man he fuckin hates this game"
Reviewer: 7/10 a little something for everyone
whats the point of staying in world war 2 in major games?
wow, a woman in WW2. so brave and powerful. 10/10
look up Lyudmila Pavlichenko
@@gnranger an exemption, not the rule
@@omicronrho9951 And? Is there a problem with highlighting unique individuals in a historical conflict?
stop giving cod 7 every year man, you guys are playing safe
Looks like it's straight to multi-player for me. Enjoy your spirited romp that teaches absolutely squat about the real thing. The battle of midway which the reviewer didn't like, is the closest you get.
He literally descirbed the Battle of Midway as one of the highlights did you even watch the video?
Anyone know the name of the song at 6:02?
11/10 - “It’s Call of Duty” -IGN
That’s so clever. You really called out IGN, even though the review was fairly critical of the game, and it scored a 7. What’s the point to your comment, other than parroting what you’ve read from others in the past. Keep repeating buzzwords and out of place insults to make yourself look smart and current.
But yet, they never gave a call of duty game a 10 hahah
@@kotw1300 the 7 is still over rated. COD is made for 10 year olds.
I’m kind of confused about the likes and dislikes. It seems people were split into hoping ign gives it a poor review or an absolutely great one. Either way they wouldn’t win with gamers now lmfaoo
“10/10 guns shoot bullets”- IGN
Anyone back here cause of the MW3 (2023) campaign review?
Campaigns and zombies are really the only thing that keep this series alive so do that and I'll buy the game *ahem* 2 years later
Going by the length of the campaign, I'll wait till the price drops significantly.
Horror on the Rhine
COD WOKE-WASHES WW2
How's it woke?
What shitty commmentary was that. It was all praises and smiles throughout the review, and then a rating of 7.
The female russian seems like the most interesting part of the single player. Should've dedicated the entire campaign to her story. Could've been even better and longer.
She's a creation of Russian propaganda. Anyone who doesn't understand that is a moron.
@@micblades1117 what propaganda? WW2 is over bro. You’re the moron.
@@micblades1117 No, she is actually based of a real life Russian sniper, nicknamed “Lady Death” who was the deadliest female sniper ever.
@@choppaflop2939 Yes, and, I'm saying she's propaganda from the Russian government. smh
@@micblades1117 Propaganda or not, there were 309 less Nazis because of her. Service as Sniper was June 1941 - June 1942. 309 kills in 1 year seems like one hell of a killstreak. Her name was Lyudmila Pavlichenko. 🖖🏼
Buying a call of duty for the single player is like buying an audio book for someone thats deaf