Since you want to exercise your 5th Amendment Right, The Cop resorts to EXTORTION in an effort to commit a FELONY (Title 18 sec. 242) leaving 2 options: 1. Abandon your Rights. 2. Kidnapping for failure to abandon your Rights, and Seizure of your body and blood without a warrant. Cop Splaining occurs when Police RATIONALIZE their Criminal Activity. I'm calling the Sheriff to have him arrest two FELONS. So, with a 0.009 the Felon is MANUFACTURING a problem which only exists because the first Cops exaggerates the driving pattern. If you let Cops keep talking they will produce a gun and dead body to convict you with.
More Cop Splaining, Exaggeration, Extortion, and Paranoia. If this DUI Oink is not a Felon, no one is! - Get away form me you Felon! The whole point of the Bill of Rights is to make it exceedingly difficult for TYRANTS to exploit the People, because Tyrants are not REASONABLE, they are P.s.y-c.h.o. DUI is not a CRIME (No Victim), it's a Contract (Code) violation (Admiralty (Commerce), not Common (People) Law).
Funny thing to me is! Why no search why no get on the ground no pulling guns! Oh he isn’t black! They just let him get back in his car no safety concerns? Oh he is not black! The privilege!
It's our job to keep people safe, as he speeds 40mph over the limit, drives in the wrong lane, runs stop signs. Sure, you really care about our safety.
They "put their life on the line everyday that they go to work," but getting vaccinated is too risky because there is a one in a million chance there will be adverse side effects. Can't be a cop unless you live in fear🤷♂️
@@nathanbopp6163 They do not put their life on the line everyday. They aren't even among the top 15 most dangerous jobs. A garbageman is 250% more likely to die on the job than a cop is. Construction, transportation, farming, fishing, all are more dangerous than being a cop, and they are productive. The only thing cops produce is stress and misery. Please stop spreading the copaganda. about how dangerous it is to be a cop.
@@machans372 oh really? So asking questions and the exercising of rights is taught to be suspicious acts when confronted by law enforcement? I can tell you that they dont teach that in the academy, some cops are just worthless beings who want to skip the necessary process in order to make their jobs easier which ultimately is an infringement of our rights. THAT IS NOT THEIR JOB!!! get that through your thick skull and stop being ignorant.
As a Citizen, If you EVER gain the attention of a Law Enforcement Officer, Your Life Is In Danger... If you survive the encounter, Your Life Will Be Ruined By The Judicial System.
When a man stands up for his rights he's a roadside attorney. When a cop pulls you over and makes up law as he goes along in order to entrap you he's just doing his job. The disconnect!
you can tell cops don't watch civil rights and auditor channels on their free time. they go to bars, cheat on their wives and some of em fight pitbulls and call you roadside attorneys because you catch them violating basic citizen rights
“People spend too much time online, and they are roadsides attorneys” - which makes those people eminently more informed about the law and their rights than 99.999% of police.
Maybe, they should have been on the internet themselves and know a bit more about, well just about things like speeding, gloves and masks, field sobriety tests and not being a dick.
@@wholeass83 that is true, but not nearly as much as the legal training given to police. At least on the Internet, there are multiple sources who point out the bad legal advice.
@@molskimauler like the cop in Colorado about 16 months ago while on the job in the middle of the day hammered drunk in his patrol car and gets a complete walk on it…
@@thomasryan2679 While that can be the safest course of action, many states have laws put in place to automatically suspend your DL for a set period of time for failing to comply. A lot of cheaper than a DWI as long as you maintain the terms or are lucky enough to not be pulled over during that time frame if you are driving.
@@thomasryan2679 I once had a cop claim that my car "reeked of weed" *when I hadn't smoked pot for years and had the negative drug tests to prove it.* The cop spent 20 minutes searching my car for something that didn't exist. I laughed at him when he got out of my car and told me I was free to leave.
@@ianbattles7290 I've had the same experience only in my case I have never smoked pot and no one who has ever riding in my car has smoked pot recently as my spouse is highly allergic and even a recent lingering odor can cause a reaction.
Specialized? Lol. They pick a person to go take the classes to learn how to operate their specific brand of breathalyzer. He's his depts specialist because he's only one they sent for the training. Instead of training them all. This was the course of action for small town police dept. I imagine it's a common practice.
"The fact that you drove fine, spoke fine, showed no signs of intoxication, were entirely reasonable, and weren't even close to the legal limit on my PBT... they all mean nothing. Because I'm a cop, and I just need to harass you. Because it's my crack."
speaks to the constant fear of the public scrutiny, I mean, if they had nothing to fear, why are they afraid of the public? Are they afraid of retaliation?
When the cops say "I am filming you as well", his body cam usually ends up missing or edited to benefit the cop and then he don't want the guy to have his cell phone to film him.
Yeah because hes worried about his position. He needs him to be drunk. He needs to give him that field sobriety test or what good is he. Otherwise he would have simply gave him the breathalyzer.
Seriously! He couldn't even complete a coherent sentence. Either he was drunk or scared of the camera pointed at his face, could be both. Actually, he did look a little flushed in the face, how about he take the field sobriety test and see if he can pass it...
Judging by these two officers actions, the very LAST thing they are concerned with is "public safety". Like many others, they ARE interested in power and control. Even after passing the test, the cop just HAD to issue his rehearsed lecture, like talking to a 5-year old.
FST been hilarious and scary at the same time. In Finland cops NEVER run such bullshit test. Loosing your balance, slurred speech etc are indicators of drunk driving but prove absolutely nothing since person just might have bad balance or medical issue that does not effect driving capability. Breathalyzer is used almost every time, and/or "lollipop" (field drug test) and if these tests show over the limit, then person is taken to jail, or if they demand it to blood test that has to confirm breathalyzers or lollipops result. This is cause breathalyzer test is not 100% accurate, but blood test is. Most often these are boarder line cases where its 0.01 over the legal limit and most cases alcohol percentage has dropped below before person gets into blood test, so charges are dropped and this should be the goal of these tests. It wastes drivers time but they are then under the limit so no harm no foul. Our cops also tend to give drivers 5-15 minutes since smoking cigarettes and even hand sanitizer effects the result. Also cops here did volunteer based study and found out that from all the drivers percipients that were under influence of chemical if i recall right 80% were under influence.. of prescription drugs, where alcohol was 10% and rest of the illegal drugs made up another 10%. So i would be more worried about drivers that wont even tap the breathalyzer or lollipop tests...
@@bindingcurve it's also highly subjective by whomever administers it. The cops like them because a "failure" combined with an additional test upon return to the station helps their case. While the breathalyzer isn't perfect, it's objective at least. However a register of .009 is pretty laughable for the cops to say the things he said. A breath mint 15-30 mins prior can register higher than that.
@@Hellsong89 While I think that the smartest thing to do in general is avoid doing FSTs, doing them is exactly what proved to the police that I was ok to drive in the only experience I’ve had with being investigated for a DUI many years ago, and I was probably just at the legal limit or a bit over - this was when the limit was .10 instead of .08 (however, I didn’t do the roadside breathalyzer [which _GREATLY_ frustrated the cops as they tried to convince me a million different ways to do the test, saying I had nothing to worry about if I was below the legal limit etc etc, but I continued to tell them that I simply didn’t trust their accuracy and heard about many instances where they were very inaccurate]; that was my way of calling their bluff... Either they had enough probable cause to arrest me by then after I had done all their FSTs or they didn’t - and I told them I’d do however many more FSTs they wanted me to do because I knew I was acing them, but I absolutely was _NOT_ going to blow into their roadside breathalyzer as that would have likely gotten me arrested).
An inner ear infection would throw your balance off enough to fail a FST. Tiredness would cause you to fail a FST. A strong wind would cause you to fail a FST. A really cold night would cause you to fail a FST. Plus, if a cop has just _decided_ you are DUI, then you’ll fail an FST anyway.
He just said it "it makes our job harder and doesn't improve the outcome." So it makes their job harder & we don't go to jail and they hate it! He definitely would've been charged with DUI, no doubt in my mind if he took the tests!
They use the finger following test before the walk the white line test to throw you off balance. Its like being spun around afew times and trying to walk... Science prob gavem the trick...
they know it is not admissible in curt cz thing, but he contaminates the straw, in covid times, most likle it was 0-09 from his hands from washing with alcool... and even soo that dosent mean he washed befor contaminating... and helped spreed covid -.- just an idiot....
@@StonyBaboon Covid is an airborne respiratory disease spread through aerosols. You have to inhale it to get it. Touching something with covid on it doesn't give you covid. It's not like the norovirus where ingesting it gives you the disease.
I lived in Canton Ga for 10 years about 8 miles north of Woodstock Ga. This is one of the most hated departments in the state. They lost their certification to patrol interstate within their city limits. When they applied to get recertified, people came from all over the state to protest this department getting any kind of certification to do. Traffic stops on the interstate that runs through their jurisdiction!
@@1stamendmentmedia464 Or represent yourself. Plus, the most accomplished attorney in United States history, Robert H Jackson stated in no uncertain terms should someone make a statement to law enforcement officials. Robert H Jackson was a US Attorney General, US Solicitor General, and Associate Judge of the Supreme Court. He was also the Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Nuremberg trials. The man knows what he is talking about.
6 inches from the ditch? He never left the pavement, never kicked up rocks. Meanwhile, the cop runs stop signs, drives in the wrong lane, and speeds, BEFORE, BEFORE observing the driver almost run into the ditch. Now, he takes the breath test, if it comes out higher then .08 he is guilty of drunk driving, if it comes out lower then .08 (in this case 10 times lower) he is still guilty of drunk driving. So, note to all, never take their tests. They will not exonerate you. More lying cops who don't understand why people have stopped trusting them.
Based on what LackLuster said, you pretty much HAVE to agree to some kind of test. And I'd recommend the breathalyzer over the field sobriety test, because even though both are inaccurate the breathalyzer needs to be followed up by a blood test if you show you're over. And that IS very accurate, if done correctly. Failing the breathalyzer also puts you on notice that you need to contact a lawyer ASAP, before the cops get evidence that can be submitted to a court.
@@MAWA-Vik19 … wrong-0, Timmy. “Phishing” is online scamming for random useable content gathering when sending mass emails. In this case, “Fishing Expedition” is the proper pejorative terminology for the unwarranted and unwanted police interaction that leads to interrogation.
When people take the time to understand their rights we become "roadside lawyers". The problem is the average citizen understands more about the law and constitutional rights then the average cop. I'm amazed how he tried to convince this gentlemen of wrong doing.
The ironic thing is a lot of cops believe they understand the law better even making up laws to confuse you...so would that mean a cop that spent three months learning the superficials of searches, holdings, and variois criminal offenses has a similar competency for the law as someone that spent 4 years specialising in it? Had this discussion with a friend thats a cop about asset forfeiture, and insisted that it requires a conviction and be directly tied to a crine you have been charged with everywhere, not just in our state.
I got out of a red light ticket because the cop did not get me on video (not running a red light) and he broke the posted speed limit without lights or siren to pull me over. ALWAYS get their dash cam video and look for their mistakes. They make a living off of ours.
"Darn it, we didn't get to arrest this guy it would have made our evening!" These cops were at least human about this whole situation! "Respect" is everything!!!!
This is a very good example of law enforcement using "professionalism" to attempt to cover up lies, tyranny, unlawful stops etc.. Most of the time, no matter how nice or polite they may seem they are never trying to help you out or protect your constitutional/judicial rights. ALWAYS be informed of your rights in and out of court and know how to effectively assert them, that's better protection than you'll ever receive from any government agent.
@@krane15 it's scary. I've known a retired le for decades and one time I witnessed him behave like a sneaky criminal and I was in shock. I could not wrap my head around the fact that I knew I would not behave in such a way and yet he did. Still shaking my head over it months later. Psychopathic traits are a real thing in the police force.
"People spend too much time online and are roadside attorneys..." except the driver was right in everything he said and the cop was wrong on several points. When it comes right down to it, the cop isn't angry because the driver was incorrect, he is annoyed that the driver isn't accepting the bs that the cop is shovelings. The driver is guilty of not "Respectin' my authority"...
Keep fighting the good fight, LL! Until these public servants realize integrity and accountability are values not to be feared, you are needed. Thank you for your work
Cops job is to put citizens in jail and anything they can do or say to make that happen is a bonus. Citizens weapon against cops is knowledge and cops don’t don’t like knowledgeable people at traffic stops. The second cop was not there to be sure the driver was safe to drive, but instead use the DUI test to say he failed the test. With a breathalyser, he can only go by what the display readout.
What gives cops the delusion that the public has to help them do their job??? We explicitly have a constitutional right NOT to assist any investigation against ourselves!!!!
@@ianbattles7290 , not only that. Cops want citizens to assist them with putting them in jail. His sole reason to see her ID is to see if she has warrants, and as soon as someone say no they then turn it into suspension.
I have learned MORE about my rights from the "Internet/Online" than anyone else, so the Police was 100% WRONG and stupid for complaining that people stand up for their rights. Well done to the man that was stopped.
The cops conversation - priceless. Also fun that it's the cops own questions that he claims gives him reasonable suspicion - not any action of the detainee.
This cop may be the last straw to getting field sobriety tests thrown out of court permanently. I’ve never heard such useless questions and then such useless answers he gave to his own questions. If he already has his own answers, why ask any questions?
The DUI cop saying that their presence alone makes some people nervous. That is 100% true. I don't know if it's because I used to have a reason to be nervous (cannabis smoke that would have to drive to pick up cannabis). Now I don't have any reason to be nervous, but my heart rate still jumps when a cop gets behind me even with me doing nothing illegal.
Isn't that just a symptom, or reaction to the overzealous and often times corrupt policing? Add to it that some reactions with police are cordial, and it causes confusion and stress to almost every interaction.
4:46: Based on the cop's body language, his tone, and the pattern of his speech as he tells the story about the driver up the street who did the field sobriety tests, I'd bet that he made up that whole story.
As a roadside attorney thats online too much, I can report that when cops are videoed being pulled over for suspicion of DUI they almost never take the field sobriety test. Hmm, wonder why that is?
Exactly, every time the cops get sued the only public statement they make is, "we cannot comment on pending litigation". Because the cops know, better than anyone, that the smartest thing to do is remain silent!!
The Sam Browne belts they wear, constrict and compress their lower spine. Many cops with this problem will have narcotics dispensed to them via a police oriented physician. Oxycontin is one of these drugs.
@@ThePresidentialTouch which is why some cops allow people to go free even after finding drugs because the cop says they're going to take the drugs and submit for destruction but the officer just ends up bringing it home. Just think how advantageous it would be to be a cop with a drug problem. He could make a sizeable bust and take the drugs and let the guy go and keep all the drugs to themselves
This was a good one. Them DUI stops can be super stressful, especially when you know you're not under the influence. But like you said, most people feel intimidated and pressured to convince a cop of no wrongdoing, so they comply comply comply. When in reality it is up to the cop to prove it and you don't have to assist him in obtaining proof against yourself.
And that cop tried to pressure him every way he could into taking those tests. You know where he said and the cops are the only ones that knows the trick to those tests.
Nothing makes you feel quite as powerless as a low I.Q tyrant attempting pseudo science, that certain outcomes benefit his career, on you. All the justice and balance of a modern day Salem witch trial.
It’s great that he obtained the dashcam videos from both officers, I hope he filed complaints against them for their reckless response in pulling him over and actually committing more infractions than they accused him of along with policy violations.
Maybe if the LEO's spent a little more time online they would know exactly where they were going wrong. These videos should be in the training at this point.
I'm glad that the body camera footage was seen on this video. This is a perfect example of law enforcement getting away with vehicle infractions in the line of duty. It's no wonder why the guys ticket was thrown out after they seen the body can't footage. I think that if you're stopped by law enforcement, you should always FOIA the body cam footage for your case. Nice video.
The driver, when asked where his friends house was, said "I don't know the address, but it is two minutes down the road". Then the cop tells the other cop he refused to answer. This is the bullshit that needs to stop.
I had a police officer friend of mine (I was his Mechanic) I asked him to do that test on me just to see if I'd pass & he stated to me the test is flawed & that I wouldn't be able to pass it as he had to practice the movements to give the examples several times & he was correct I was completely sober & I wasn't able to perform the test correctly as he said it it's an agility test that most people will fail.
He shouldn’t have been so respectful. He should’ve told the first officer that he crossed the white line because he was afraid he was about to be rear-ended. Then he should’ve told the DUI officer that he sounded slammed, was slurring his words, and could barely put together a coherent sentence.
Field sobriety tests are absolutely ridiculous, I was given one when I was sleeping in my backseat after driving for 25 hours straight and had my friend drive for me so I can get a few hours. I was woken up by a flashlight in my face and dragged out of the car, being told I am under the influence of drugs or drunk the state trooper kept saying I was even tho he literally just woke me up from a sleep. He kept saying that and kept insisting even though I have not smoked since I was 18 I was 24 at the time and didn’t have a drink of alcohol since I was 23. Cop tried to arrest me because he kept screaming at me even tho I “ passed” his tests but then told my friends in the car I am not allowed in the drivers seat because I was intoxicated. But yet I was in the backseat not even driving but yet I was the only one pulled out of the car and harassed.
Join Americans against qualified immunity, cops will not stop this type of behavior until they are held financially and legally accountable for the deplorable actions against the people, together we will win!
"This [the breathalizer test] is inadmissible in court....there's factors that create problems..." So why are you relying on an unreliable test officer?!
A roadside breath test on a breathalyser in the UK, is just an indication test... and an evidential breath test, is then carried out on a more accurate machine at the police station. Sure there are a number of factors that could cause the roadside breath test to be inaccurate, some of which this testing officer performed. Merely using any roadside test, without backing it up with more accurate testing; will always be fraught with subjectivity and could all hinge on whether the police officer is having a bad hair day or not...!
@@tangomoggynoengi8518 in Spain it's the same. First breath test it's just for reference, but it's close to illegal amount of alcohol in blood then you'll have to perform it again with the more precise machine. However, they usually have this police van that comes to the traffic stop that carries the proper breath machine inside, so there's no need to go to the police station. I've never heard of police making you one of those balance test. Only saw them in American movies (and now on RUclips). I don't think a judge would take them as reliable at all.
Cops calling citizens "roadside or Google attorneys" should understand that an individual can ask questions related towards that subject with any lawer or judge... Knowledge is power
So in another words there is no point obeying the law as people who suppose to protect us - dont know the law themselves and abuse it to their own advantages. Well done officers...
LOVING THIS GUY’S RESPONSES!!! That was an awesome video. Showed the chosen ignorance by the cops and the chosen responses by the driver very well! Of course , most people support the non-drinking driver’s (actually low amount of alcohol or lapsed time since drinking) success with his drive home this night. Thank you thank you THANK YOU!!!!!! For this great inspiring video. As always and I really mean this I truly enjoyed watching.
The DUI enforcement officer was lying by saying that the breathalyzer showed the driver almost intoxicated and played the suspicious card and the observer driving card to give the other officer the power to do whatever he wanted.
4:05 You can see that the officer's body camera is pointed directly at the tag light and you can also CLEARLY see that the light is illuminated, so this is just another excuse for pulling Ashton over based on the fact that he swerved defensively because the officer flew up on him at a high rate of speed.
So the officer first states that the breathalyzer is inadmissible as evidence in court. The he later states that field sobriety tests ARE admissible. So what he did was CONFIRM that you shouldn’t take the field sobriety test! Duh.
Wonderful. He touches that straw with a finger that was just knuckle deep in his nostril about 10 minutes before. Is there any reason they give this kind of authority to an 8th grade drop out?
If suspicious behavior is more accurate, the second officer's actions were very suspicious. He drove 30mph over the speed limit without activating his lights, he said "put that in your phone" then seconds later he said," pocket", which displays he can't keep his train of thought. He also forgot to put on gloves, to use the breath test, leaving all kinds of germs on the straw. Maybe he's the one who should be tested for drugs or alcohol! Telling the driver the breath test isn't as accurate, after administering it, is exactly why they shouldn't be allowed. The other tests are EXTREMELY subjective, as was demonstrated when a Georgia officer arrested several individuals for DUI, based only on those tests, and not a breath test. Because someone took an antibiotic, he told him that could impair his driving and did a field sobriety test, failing him, and arresting him. His blood work came back 100% clean, and his chief told a newspaper that blood tests aren't as accurate as his officers training in doing field sobriety tests! That's exactly why no one should agree to a roadside field sobriety test. If you haven't been drinking, you could agree to do the breath test, to prove they had no reason to arrest you, if they do. Cops are awarded for the most dui arrests. It doesn't matter if blood tests later determine there were no drugs or alcohol involved. It still counts as a good dui arrest! That only gives cops incentive to cheat the system and arrest innocent citizens! They don't look at them as people, whose lives they are messing up for a DUI arrest. It's very traumatic to be arrested for something you didn't do. You lose total faith in a system that is supposed to protect and serve you. No officer should be awarded anything for doing their job
Amen! Talk about completely out of control egos - some of these morons actually BELIEVE they are more accurate than a blood test. I can only imagine what their spouses and children are subjected to. THOSE sociopaths are the ones who should be institutionalized.
I have so many thoughts but I will just add this one, I really appreciate what he said about hoping that it will become less suspicious behavior to protect your rights. Profound just absolutely profound. What a world we live in now.
"You could just submit and do everything we tell you to do and it will make my life easier". Thats all i heard when the two officers were talking while writing the citation. It is not my job to make your job easier.
@@barrysims9906 I agree. No swerving. Ever. Yet, when a vehicle comes up fast behind me, I feel almost impelled to make way by moving over, which I suppose qualifies as swerving. It’s my way of signaling I do not intend of being in your way whatsoever, if either the other driver is rushing somewhere or I’m driving too slow at night or during inclement weather. I do move away as far as I can from the middle line, as if to say “Be my guest…pass freely and easily. I get that you aren’t supposed to do that tho. I really just got it now tbh. Just like you aren’t supposed to swerve for animals in the road. So thanks for mentioning it.
@@msunderstanding3198 IKR..I do as well..here in PA there's a part of the 115 that scares me coming over the mountain in bad weather its all twisty n curvy n being I made the mistake of buying a ford focus lol its a light car u can feel the wind move it..I tend to pull over alittle if someone comes racing up behind me to get out of the way..guess I won't be doing that anymore..
After accusing people of being "roadside attorneys," the officer says, "It just makes our job harder." It actually makes it harder for the police to abuse people's rights when they know their rights under the Constitution. And too many police officers don't like it when they can't steam roll over citizens who know their rights.
We all have been driving on a deserted road at night and been surprised when someone is suddenly behind you....knowing the only way that is possible is that were greatly exceeding the speed limit. It's obvious to me why the driver moved over the fog line....he was distracted by the vehicle behind him that shouldn't have been there in the first place.
Of course not. But people are stupid and cops are experts at getting them to confess. Did you notice how the driver stated he wouldn't answer any questions, then allows the cop to engage him in incriminating conversation. Cop: "Well you definitely have had a little bit of alcohol tonight" Driver: OK. Really? Then the driver start to converse with the cop as if he's his friend. Stop socialize with cops. He's not trying to be your friend.
you have to remember that the police can actually legally lie to you. I truly hope you took these guys to court to show that the second officer broke speed laws safety laws to get to you to tell you you broke the law he thought!
There is a distinction between lying as part of an investigation and false official statements. If a cop tells me I'm legally required to do something, then I do it despite not being legally required to, I'm much more likely to get any evidence produced dismissed, since that lie turns the request into a demand. If a cop tells another cop something about me that's untrue, it becomes a hoax, defamation, slander, etc. Now, far too few jurisdictions do anything to cops who cause these problems, but there is a legal distinction here.
Love how everytime someone knows their rights they say their being difficult. It’s sad that people like this exist in the world. Unfortunately things will never change and police will never learn.
I’m a gosh at how universal this kind of behavior with law-enforcement is all across America. This was a reach on the law-enforcement side. The introduction of cameras have made a world of difference.. I Camera doesn’t lie.
I like how nobody brought up the fact that the stopping officer was racing up the road and in defense there guy moved to not impede passage or be rear ended.
@@MrNabmilf in Tulsa ok early 80s. My friends and left a bar on 11th st. I was in the backseat. A police car passed us on the right, got in front and slammed their brakes causing us to rear-end them. We weren't speeding so it wasn't a major impact. As far as I know that was perfectly fine thing for them to do.
Those field sobriety tests are horrible. I did it once after sleeping in my car on a cold night and the wind was blowing over 34mph. Never could have passed. Took the breathalyzer and blew 0. Still arrested and had blood drawn, came up clean. All charges dropped. I should have never done that field sobriety test.
You got arrested because cops get off on attempting to ruin someone else's life. But, when they get caught doing something they are the biggest cry babies you have ever seen.
When we use our rights to protect ourselves that means we are being difficult, and making their job harder? They are suppose to UPHOLD our rights not STOMP on them!
These videos are great very educational. For years people thought they just had to comply to these tyrants. But with these videos it shows how to handle situations with your rights being exercised I've had plenty of practice myself
![Six Hundred Strike [EPIC: The Musical] Full Animatic](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zov6NXIAuow/mqdefault.jpg)
KnowledgeIsPower - ruclips.net/video/qyWH0mI8W58/видео.html
Holly Springs Police Dept - facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064859048067
Since you want to exercise your 5th Amendment Right, The Cop resorts to EXTORTION in an effort to commit a FELONY (Title 18 sec. 242) leaving 2 options: 1. Abandon your Rights. 2. Kidnapping for failure to abandon your Rights, and Seizure of your body and blood without a warrant. Cop Splaining occurs when Police RATIONALIZE their Criminal Activity. I'm calling the Sheriff to have him arrest two FELONS. So, with a 0.009 the Felon is MANUFACTURING a problem which only exists because the first Cops exaggerates the driving pattern. If you let Cops keep talking they will produce a gun and dead body to convict you with.
More Cop Splaining, Exaggeration, Extortion, and Paranoia. If this DUI Oink is not a Felon, no one is!
-
Get away form me you Felon! The whole point of the Bill of Rights is to make it exceedingly difficult for TYRANTS to exploit the People, because Tyrants are not REASONABLE, they are P.s.y-c.h.o. DUI is not a CRIME (No Victim), it's a Contract (Code) violation (Admiralty (Commerce), not Common (People) Law).
Thanks for the share 👍🏻💪🏻
Funny thing to me is! Why no search why no get on the ground no pulling guns! Oh he isn’t black! They just let him get back in his car no safety concerns? Oh he is not black! The privilege!
Lack the Facebook comment section is blowing up on their page man hopefully more people see the work you do for us !
Cop sounds mad that people know their rights.
'God dammit, have to actually do my job'
Exactly
He wishes it was back in the old days, before the internet.
In Canada if you refuse, you get a DUI.
@@johndc2998 I know and I still refuse because I haven’t had a drink in about 20 years.
It's our job to keep people safe, as he speeds 40mph over the limit, drives in the wrong lane, runs stop signs. Sure, you really care about our safety.
It's not their job to keep people safe though. It's to enforce law, which they seem to be incapable of following themselves.
They "put their life on the line everyday that they go to work," but getting vaccinated is too risky because there is a one in a million chance there will be adverse side effects. Can't be a cop unless you live in fear🤷♂️
Safety and science. Say those two words and you can get away with any bullshit ya want.
@@nathanbopp6163 They do not put their life on the line everyday. They aren't even among the top 15 most dangerous jobs. A garbageman is 250% more likely to die on the job than a cop is. Construction, transportation, farming, fishing, all are more dangerous than being a cop, and they are productive. The only thing cops produce is stress and misery.
Please stop spreading the copaganda. about how dangerous it is to be a cop.
@@canucanoe2861 law enforcement is actually number 22 on the list. Not even close to the most dangerous job
“I hate it when these people know their rights, it makes my job harder.”
NOT IF YOU’RE DOING YOUR JOB CORRECTLY
Perfect statement 👍🏾
They are doing their jobs correctly!! When will people learn that *THIS* is what they are *TRAINED* to do?!?!?
@@machans372 oh really? So asking questions and the exercising of rights is taught to be suspicious acts when confronted by law enforcement? I can tell you that they dont teach that in the academy, some cops are just worthless beings who want to skip the necessary process in order to make their jobs easier which ultimately is an infringement of our rights.
THAT IS NOT THEIR JOB!!! get that through your thick skull and stop being ignorant.
@@machans372 is this satire? Your recent comments are like exact contrasts to the comment you made on this video?
@@machans372 cops are trained to produce revenue, i'm not sure why ppl are mis-reading your comment
As a Citizen, If you EVER gain the attention of a Law Enforcement Officer, Your Life Is In Danger... If you survive the encounter, Your Life Will Be Ruined By The Judicial System.
@@criminalbrewing5509 truth
When a man stands up for his rights he's a roadside attorney. When a cop pulls you over and makes up law as he goes along in order to entrap you he's just doing his job. The disconnect!
you can tell cops don't watch civil rights and auditor channels on their free time. they go to bars, cheat on their wives and some of em fight pitbulls and call you roadside attorneys because you catch them violating basic citizen rights
Probably the best comment I've read in years!!!
Narcissistic psychopaths
When an unintelligent person tries to sound smart using "big" words.
He is "doing is job" because the police have trained him to routinely violate the rights of citizens.
“People spend too much time online, and they are roadsides attorneys” - which makes those people eminently more informed about the law and their rights than 99.999% of police.
"Ignorance of the law is not an excuse" so every citizen needs to know their rights to the same degree as an attorney.
Maybe, they should have been on the internet themselves and know a bit more about, well just about things like speeding, gloves and masks, field sobriety tests and not being a dick.
Not always. Plenty of bad legal advice out there
@@wholeass83 that is true, but not nearly as much as the legal training given to police. At least on the Internet, there are multiple sources who point out the bad legal advice.
People keep saying the cops don't know the law. That's false. They know the law. They just don't want you to so they can infringe on them
The cop literally can't string a coherent sentence together.
Probably been drinking.
@@molskimauler like the cop in Colorado about 16 months ago while on the job in the middle of the day hammered drunk in his patrol car and gets a complete walk on it…
His eyes are beady and his logic makes no sense.
Either drinking or on pills.
4:22
Roadside attorneys that quite often know more about law than policy enforcement agents do.
If we had more "roadside attorneys" it could make the Police more accountable.
@@thomasryan2679 While that can be the safest course of action, many states have laws put in place to automatically suspend your DL for a set period of time for failing to comply. A lot of cheaper than a DWI as long as you maintain the terms or are lucky enough to not be pulled over during that time frame if you are driving.
Don't need em, we need to stop giving people authority over others.
@@thomasryan2679 I once had a cop claim that my car "reeked of weed" *when I hadn't smoked pot for years and had the negative drug tests to prove it.* The cop spent 20 minutes searching my car for something that didn't exist. I laughed at him when he got out of my car and told me I was free to leave.
@@ianbattles7290 I've had the same experience only in my case I have never smoked pot and no one who has ever riding in my car has smoked pot recently as my spouse is highly allergic and even a recent lingering odor can cause a reaction.
It just gets me that cop think only lawyers and them know the law...many citizens know the law better than most cops.
This is why everyone should be using dashcams. And 100% of the time ALWAYS REFUSE THE TEST.
"scientifically proven" From a person who the courts say is allowed to lie to the public.
Exactly the reason to NEVER believe anything a cop tells you.
And probably doesn't know what confirmation bias is. Or has done any serious scientific study in his life.
From a guy that spent three days in an 'Alcohol Avenger' class learning the 'science'
The LEO with the room temperature IQ .
Nothing that is determined by almost pure subjectivity is scientific. Unreal....
Cop says he understands that “some” cops abuse authority but earlier he threatened to take him to jail for refusing the tests.
The cop who “specializes in DUI investigations” was the one who sounded completely drunk, not the driver!
No doubt. He’s wasted
Yea it was definitely difficult listening to him attempt to string sentences together. Dude was a dick.
Specialized? Lol. They pick a person to go take the classes to learn how to operate their specific brand of breathalyzer. He's his depts specialist because he's only one they sent for the training. Instead of training them all. This was the course of action for small town police dept. I imagine it's a common practice.
That 0.009 probably was from his hands.
He's wasted
"The fact that you drove fine, spoke fine, showed no signs of intoxication, were entirely reasonable, and weren't even close to the legal limit on my PBT... they all mean nothing. Because I'm a cop, and I just need to harass you. Because it's my crack."
THOSE are the facts.....
"It Makes Our Job Harder" Yes officer, the days where you could get away with anything, because nobody understood their rights or the law, are over!
Qualified immunity.....😣
@@tmo2798 the next thing we gotta get outta the way.
Their job should be difficult!
Cops don’t understand what it’s like to deal with them 😂 they don’t understand that THEY are the ones being difficult not the civilians
If people exercising ur rights are difficult for these clowns, then they should get another job.
Cops revenue generation questions are perfect: if he answers the questions he’s lying. If he doesn’t answer it’s super suspicious
"Safety" is not your job. If he isn't breaking the law, you HAVE to let him go. You don't like it? Tough, get another job.
"You can try to stalk me on Facebook..."?? He thinks someone wants to stalk him? This is a big testament to his mindset... He doesn't need to be a cop
speaks to the constant fear of the public scrutiny, I mean, if they had nothing to fear, why are they afraid of the public? Are they afraid of retaliation?
When the cops say "I am filming you as well", his body cam usually ends up missing or edited to benefit the cop and then he don't want the guy to have his cell phone to film him.
@Ms. Kitty Katt always record the police, whether they like it or not. The less they like it the more likely they are going to come unhinged
Its funny how we thought having a camera on the cop and the car would stop all this. But the cops have figured out how to get around all that by lying
Those pesky constitutional rights always making things difficult for cops.
That DUI officer sounded drunk himself. His sentences weren't making any sense, mumbling and jumbled speech.
Yeah because hes worried about his position. He needs him to be drunk. He needs to give him that field sobriety test or what good is he. Otherwise he would have simply gave him the breathalyzer.
Probably on pills of some sort.
“You can stick it in your phone, that’s perfectly fine.” Whattt?????
"You know what I'm saying" (Cuz we in da hood, dawg)
@@Greenthumb6a - Exactly. I think the cop was off his tits on coke or maybe drunk the way he was talking.
The “DUI SPECIALIST” actually sounds impaired compared to his so called suspect.
I wonder if he had alcohol on his hands when he handled the straw.
@@JohnMarkThrasher if he used alcohol based hand sanitizer he would
He’s intoxicated by his own assessment of himself.
Thought the same thing.
Seriously! He couldn't even complete a coherent sentence. Either he was drunk or scared of the camera pointed at his face, could be both. Actually, he did look a little flushed in the face, how about he take the field sobriety test and see if he can pass it...
The officer used an alcohol swab on an a scientific alcohol test? That’s insane.
Trying to make a false positive to arrest him
Judging by these two officers actions, the very LAST thing they are concerned with is "public safety". Like many others, they ARE interested in power and control. Even after passing the test, the cop just HAD to issue his rehearsed lecture, like talking to a 5-year old.
It just makes it more embarrassing that both officers are dead wrong through the entire lecture.
this is the whole problem with policing in total.
Police always lie!
Police always lie! If you have any doubt. Just remember police always lie.
Copslpaining
I love how he says sobriety tests are scientific proven but the breathalyzer is not.
The FST is not proven, just admissable.
FST been hilarious and scary at the same time. In Finland cops NEVER run such bullshit test. Loosing your balance, slurred speech etc are indicators of drunk driving but prove absolutely nothing since person just might have bad balance or medical issue that does not effect driving capability. Breathalyzer is used almost every time, and/or "lollipop" (field drug test) and if these tests show over the limit, then person is taken to jail, or if they demand it to blood test that has to confirm breathalyzers or lollipops result. This is cause breathalyzer test is not 100% accurate, but blood test is. Most often these are boarder line cases where its 0.01 over the legal limit and most cases alcohol percentage has dropped below before person gets into blood test, so charges are dropped and this should be the goal of these tests. It wastes drivers time but they are then under the limit so no harm no foul. Our cops also tend to give drivers 5-15 minutes since smoking cigarettes and even hand sanitizer effects the result. Also cops here did volunteer based study and found out that from all the drivers percipients that were under influence of chemical if i recall right 80% were under influence.. of prescription drugs, where alcohol was 10% and rest of the illegal drugs made up another 10%. So i would be more worried about drivers that wont even tap the breathalyzer or lollipop tests...
@@bindingcurve it's also highly subjective by whomever administers it. The cops like them because a "failure" combined with an additional test upon return to the station helps their case.
While the breathalyzer isn't perfect, it's objective at least. However a register of .009 is pretty laughable for the cops to say the things he said. A breath mint 15-30 mins prior can register higher than that.
@@Hellsong89
While I think that the smartest thing to do in general is avoid doing FSTs, doing them is exactly what proved to the police that I was ok to drive in the only experience I’ve had with being investigated for a DUI many years ago, and I was probably just at the legal limit or a bit over - this was when the limit was .10 instead of .08 (however, I didn’t do the roadside breathalyzer [which _GREATLY_ frustrated the cops as they tried to convince me a million different ways to do the test, saying I had nothing to worry about if I was below the legal limit etc etc, but I continued to tell them that I simply didn’t trust their accuracy and heard about many instances where they were very inaccurate]; that was my way of calling their bluff... Either they had enough probable cause to arrest me by then after I had done all their FSTs or they didn’t - and I told them I’d do however many more FSTs they wanted me to do because I knew I was acing them, but I absolutely was _NOT_ going to blow into their roadside breathalyzer as that would have likely gotten me arrested).
An inner ear infection would throw your balance off enough to fail a FST.
Tiredness would cause you to fail a FST.
A strong wind would cause you to fail a FST.
A really cold night would cause you to fail a FST.
Plus, if a cop has just _decided_ you are DUI, then you’ll fail an FST anyway.
“They’re scientifically proven, and you know why you can’t prove’m?” Great Logic..
I was wondering if I was the only one that noticed it😅 One of those WTF did he just say moments for sure😅
They purposely hire people with low IQs to do the job.
@@thebullgator I actually think they are handcuffed... have to hire the people that gravitate towards it.
LOL, I though I was the only one that noticed that.
Psychopath lol
Cops have told me that standing up for my constitutional rights is suspicious of itself because normally people don't do that.
He just said it "it makes our job harder and doesn't improve the outcome." So it makes their job harder & we don't go to jail and they hate it! He definitely would've been charged with DUI, no doubt in my mind if he took the tests!
They use the finger following test before the walk the white line test to throw you off balance. Its like being spun around afew times and trying to walk... Science prob gavem the trick...
This guy is spitting straight in the face of due process. He's saying directly, he assumes guilt, even in spite of evidence.
I’m telling you,,,to be more informative,,,,,I need to get my paycheck,,,,,and I could care less if you’re innocent or not,,,,
Funny how Cops know what’s admissible in court. Without the actual court proceedings haven even been conducted.
It's already been well established that the roadside tests are inadmissible and the cops know this. This is not decided on a case by case basis.
They are cops for a reason there iq is under the minimum for cognitive functioning in life period
they know it is not admissible in curt cz thing, but he contaminates the straw, in covid times, most likle it was 0-09 from his hands from washing with alcool... and even soo that dosent mean he washed befor contaminating... and helped spreed covid -.- just an idiot....
@@StonyBaboon
Lol “in times of covid.” So gullible.
@@StonyBaboon Covid is an airborne respiratory disease spread through aerosols. You have to inhale it to get it. Touching something with covid on it doesn't give you covid. It's not like the norovirus where ingesting it gives you the disease.
I lived in Canton Ga for 10 years about 8 miles north of Woodstock Ga. This is one of the most hated departments in the state. They lost their certification to patrol interstate within their city limits. When they applied to get recertified, people came from all over the state to protest this department getting any kind of certification to do. Traffic stops on the interstate that runs through their jurisdiction!
“It makes our job harder…” U know, people knowing their rights…
Are you going to give me a cut of your salary for helping you do your job? What do I care about YOUR job difficulties.
"People spend too much time online and they're roadside attorneys" last I knew you didn't need to pass the bar to be a cop.
And you don't need to be an attorney to know the law.
@@1stamendmentmedia464 Or represent yourself. Plus, the most accomplished attorney in United States history, Robert H Jackson stated in no uncertain terms should someone make a statement to law enforcement officials. Robert H Jackson was a US Attorney General, US Solicitor General, and Associate Judge of the Supreme Court. He was also the Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Nuremberg trials. The man knows what he is talking about.
This cop cannot pass the bar. He is compelled to stop at every bar he tries to drive past.
I found it funny because the cop as alot of time too to virtue signaling someone that did nothing wrong
6 inches from the ditch? He never left the pavement, never kicked up rocks. Meanwhile, the cop runs stop signs, drives in the wrong lane, and speeds, BEFORE, BEFORE observing the driver almost run into the ditch. Now, he takes the breath test, if it comes out higher then .08 he is guilty of drunk driving, if it comes out lower then .08 (in this case 10 times lower) he is still guilty of drunk driving. So, note to all, never take their tests. They will not exonerate you. More lying cops who don't understand why people have stopped trusting them.
They can still charge you if you have under that...look it up. It's rigged against us
The biggest joke are DRE's that wrongfully arrest people because they think they're on another substance, a blood test determine they were sober
@@GabrielGarcia-300 DREs (Drug Recognition Experts) are highly coveted positions, DREs are NOT trained by medical doctors or nurses.
Based on what LackLuster said, you pretty much HAVE to agree to some kind of test. And I'd recommend the breathalyzer over the field sobriety test, because even though both are inaccurate the breathalyzer needs to be followed up by a blood test if you show you're over. And that IS very accurate, if done correctly. Failing the breathalyzer also puts you on notice that you need to contact a lawyer ASAP, before the cops get evidence that can be submitted to a court.
@@muffchomp635 in some states...not everywhere.
As a machinist who works with numbers every day, .009 is not in the same Ballard as .08, gotta love the honesty that law enforcement provides.
The fact he believes his story is crazy
Always REFUSE to answer their questions. You’re under NO OBLIGATION to ever assist them in their pathetic fishing expedition.
*phishing
@@MAWA-Vik19 Thank you Timothy
@@MAWA-Vik19 … wrong-0, Timmy. “Phishing” is online scamming for random useable content gathering when sending mass emails.
In this case, “Fishing Expedition” is the proper pejorative terminology for the unwarranted and unwanted police interaction that leads to interrogation.
@@TannerisSmol97 … don’t thank him - He’s WRONG.
@@twoblacklabs904 Was just coming back to say thanks for the correction and clarifying.
Popo has so much disdain for the public knowing their rights.
Cameras and auditors will weed these tyrants out.
@@peoplenewstoday hopefully.
🙏
When people take the time to understand their rights we become "roadside lawyers". The problem is the average citizen understands more about the law and constitutional rights then the average cop. I'm amazed how he tried to convince this gentlemen of wrong doing.
We see cops lying and they wonder why no one trust them,if ego was a drug cops would be over the limit .
“People spend to much time online and they are roadside attorneys”
“Yeah and I get that, it just makes our job harder”
🤣🤣 cop logic at its finest
The ironic thing is a lot of cops believe they understand the law better even making up laws to confuse you...so would that mean a cop that spent three months learning the superficials of searches, holdings, and variois criminal offenses has a similar competency for the law as someone that spent 4 years specialising in it?
Had this discussion with a friend thats a cop about asset forfeiture, and insisted that it requires a conviction and be directly tied to a crine you have been charged with everywhere, not just in our state.
I got out of a red light ticket because the cop did not get me on video (not running a red light) and he broke the posted speed limit without lights or siren to pull me over. ALWAYS get their dash cam video and look for their mistakes. They make a living off of ours.
"Darn it, we didn't get to arrest this guy it would have made our evening!" These cops were at least human about this whole situation! "Respect" is everything!!!!
Cop: “people spend way too much time online. Their standing up for their rights just makes our job harder”. Brilliant!!!!
This is a very good example of law enforcement using "professionalism" to attempt to cover up lies, tyranny, unlawful stops etc.. Most of the time, no matter how nice or polite they may seem they are never trying to help you out or protect your constitutional/judicial rights. ALWAYS be informed of your rights in and out of court and know how to effectively assert them, that's better protection than you'll ever receive from any government agent.
The way these cops can lie is frightening. I think they believe their lies.
@@JohnWick-bb9jl not according to the state law
@@krane15 it's scary. I've known a retired le for decades and one time I witnessed him behave like a sneaky criminal and I was in shock. I could not wrap my head around the fact that I knew I would not behave in such a way and yet he did. Still shaking my head over it months later. Psychopathic traits are a real thing in the police force.
"People spend too much time online and are roadside attorneys..." except the driver was right in everything he said and the cop was wrong on several points. When it comes right down to it, the cop isn't angry because the driver was incorrect, he is annoyed that the driver isn't accepting the bs that the cop is shovelings. The driver is guilty of not "Respectin' my authority"...
Like Cartman said. "Respect mahhh athoritae!"
@@randyindvik1171 lol
I have to know the law better than you officer, *because ignorance of the law is no excuse!!!*
Keep fighting the good fight, LL! Until these public servants realize integrity and accountability are values not to be feared, you are needed. Thank you for your work
"It just makes our job harder"
I cried so hard. Clown shoes
Haha
Cops job is to put citizens in jail and anything they can do or say to make that happen is a bonus. Citizens weapon against cops is knowledge and cops don’t don’t like knowledgeable people at traffic stops. The second cop was not there to be sure the driver was safe to drive, but instead use the DUI test to say he failed the test. With a breathalyser, he can only go by what the display readout.
What gives cops the delusion that the public has to help them do their job??? We explicitly have a constitutional right NOT to assist any investigation against ourselves!!!!
@@ianbattles7290 , not only that. Cops want citizens to assist them with putting them in jail. His sole reason to see her ID is to see if she has warrants, and as soon as someone say no they then turn it into suspension.
I have learned MORE about my rights from the "Internet/Online" than anyone else, so the Police was 100% WRONG and stupid for complaining that people stand up for their rights.
Well done to the man that was stopped.
Me too !
Choosing where you learn from on the net ....
The cops conversation - priceless.
Also fun that it's the cops own questions that he claims gives him reasonable suspicion - not any action of the detainee.
This cop may be the last straw to getting field sobriety tests thrown out of court permanently. I’ve never heard such useless questions and then such useless answers he gave to his own questions. If he already has his own answers, why ask any questions?
I tell you, these copsplaining cops should go on tour.
The DUI cop saying that their presence alone makes some people nervous. That is 100% true. I don't know if it's because I used to have a reason to be nervous (cannabis smoke that would have to drive to pick up cannabis). Now I don't have any reason to be nervous, but my heart rate still jumps when a cop gets behind me even with me doing nothing illegal.
Isn't that just a symptom, or reaction to the overzealous and often times corrupt policing? Add to it that some reactions with police are cordial, and it causes confusion and stress to almost every interaction.
4:46: Based on the cop's body language, his tone, and the pattern of his speech as he tells the story about the driver up the street who did the field sobriety tests, I'd bet that he made up that whole story.
I would make the same bet but only based on him being a cop
As soon as he said it, I said YOU’RE LYING- what a psycho that guy was, right??!!!
Gee, is that all it took? The fact that he even said it, showed he was lying. Just trying hard to get the Driver to do what HE wants him to do.
Of course its made up
.and even if not ..whats that got to do with this stop?
He was so manipulative and condescending ughhhhhh
As a roadside attorney thats online too much, I can report that when cops are videoed being pulled over for suspicion of DUI they almost never take the field sobriety test. Hmm, wonder why that is?
Exactly, every time the cops get sued the only public statement they make is, "we cannot comment on pending litigation".
Because the cops know, better than anyone, that the smartest thing to do is remain silent!!
That cop had to ask twice how old he was and slurs his words, calling his pocket his phone, I suspect he is drunk.
The Sam Browne belts they wear, constrict and compress their lower spine. Many cops with this problem will have narcotics dispensed to them via a police oriented physician. Oxycontin is one of these drugs.
@@ThePresidentialTouch which is why some cops allow people to go free even after finding drugs because the cop says they're going to take the drugs and submit for destruction but the officer just ends up bringing it home. Just think how advantageous it would be to be a cop with a drug problem. He could make a sizeable bust and take the drugs and let the guy go and keep all the drugs to themselves
@@ThePresidentialTouch Thats what my Seat belt is called in my vehicle?, ok
I actually thought the very same thing!
We're not responsible for making the cops job easier. These guys are so unbelievably entitled.
This was a good one. Them DUI stops can be super stressful, especially when you know you're not under the influence. But like you said, most people feel intimidated and pressured to convince a cop of no wrongdoing, so they comply comply comply. When in reality it is up to the cop to prove it and you don't have to assist him in obtaining proof against yourself.
And that cop tried to pressure him every way he could into taking those tests. You know where he said and the cops are the only ones that knows the trick to those tests.
Nothing makes you feel quite as powerless as a low I.Q tyrant attempting pseudo science, that certain outcomes benefit his career, on you. All the justice and balance of a modern day Salem witch trial.
Exactly. The burden of proof is up to the cops.
It’s great that he obtained the dashcam videos from both officers, I hope he filed complaints against them for their reckless response in pulling him over and actually committing more infractions than they accused him of along with policy violations.
Maybe if the LEO's spent a little more time online they would know exactly where they were going wrong.
These videos should be in the training at this point.
You get better education for being US police here from RUclips than what they actually get from police training.
they probably are only they say if this happens pretend you dont hear and continue to bully and surpess the public.
I don't think they care. They have huge egos. They won't admit they're wrong unless forced to.
I'm glad that the body camera footage was seen on this video. This is a perfect example of law enforcement getting away with vehicle infractions in the line of duty. It's no wonder why the guys ticket was thrown out after they seen the body can't footage. I think that if you're stopped by law enforcement, you should always FOIA the body cam footage for your case. Nice video.
"the thing about the breathalyzer is it isn't admissible in court."
"...good."
"Then why are you wasting time with techniques that are inadmissible in court? Why not just ask a crystal ball if I am guilty or not?"
The problem is, how much times does this cop uses hand sanitizer and touches a sanitized blowing tube
Yea probably a alcohol based hand sanitizer...
The driver, when asked where his friends house was, said "I don't know the address, but it is two minutes down the road". Then the cop tells the other cop he refused to answer. This is the bullshit that needs to stop.
Perfect example of why you shouldn’t answer ANY questions. They can twist anything you say.
Right! It's none of their damned business!
I had a police officer friend of mine (I was his Mechanic) I asked him to do that test on me just to see if I'd pass & he stated to me the test is flawed & that I wouldn't be able to pass it as he had to practice the movements to give the examples several times & he was correct I was completely sober & I wasn't able to perform the test correctly as he said it it's an agility test that most people will fail.
14:40 I always feel so sad for them when I hear them complaining about how hard their job is because people don't want to "cooperate" 🙄
The officer never said he passed the test. He said they didnt go to jail. Thus proving the point
I like this auditor...
Calm, composed, and very respectful while NOT giving up his rights.
Was he an auditor though? Or a citizen exercising his rights?
@@ericsalidbar1693 both
For an auditor, I think he answered too many questions
He shouldn’t have been so respectful. He should’ve told the first officer that he crossed the white line because he was afraid he was about to be rear-ended. Then he should’ve told the DUI officer that he sounded slammed, was slurring his words, and could barely put together a coherent sentence.
@@lt0295 and how exactly is that going to help anything?? fight cops in court you're never going to win on the street
Field sobriety tests are absolutely ridiculous, I was given one when I was sleeping in my backseat after driving for 25 hours straight and had my friend drive for me so I can get a few hours. I was woken up by a flashlight in my face and dragged out of the car, being told I am under the influence of drugs or drunk the state trooper kept saying I was even tho he literally just woke me up from a sleep. He kept saying that and kept insisting even though I have not smoked since I was 18 I was 24 at the time and didn’t have a drink of alcohol since I was 23. Cop tried to arrest me because he kept screaming at me even tho I “ passed” his tests but then told my friends in the car I am not allowed in the drivers seat because I was intoxicated. But yet I was in the backseat not even driving but yet I was the only one pulled out of the car and harassed.
Join Americans against qualified immunity, cops will not stop this type of behavior until they are held financially and legally accountable for the deplorable actions against the people, together we will win!
"This [the breathalizer test] is inadmissible in court....there's factors that create problems..."
So why are you relying on an unreliable test officer?!
EXACTLY!!!!!! IF THAT'S THE CASE THEN GIVE EVERY DRIVER CONVICTED OF DUI DO TO THE BREATHALYZER FLAW COMPENSATION AND LET'S MAKE A MASS LAWSUIT
A roadside breath test on a breathalyser in the UK, is just an indication test... and an evidential breath test, is then carried out on a more accurate machine at the police station. Sure there are a number of factors that could cause the roadside breath test to be inaccurate, some of which this testing officer performed. Merely using any roadside test, without backing it up with more accurate testing; will always be fraught with subjectivity and could all hinge on whether the police officer is having a bad hair day or not...!
@@tangomoggynoengi8518 in Spain it's the same. First breath test it's just for reference, but it's close to illegal amount of alcohol in blood then you'll have to perform it again with the more precise machine. However, they usually have this police van that comes to the traffic stop that carries the proper breath machine inside, so there's no need to go to the police station. I've never heard of police making you one of those balance test. Only saw them in American movies (and now on RUclips). I don't think a judge would take them as reliable at all.
Cops calling citizens "roadside or Google attorneys" should understand that an individual can ask questions related towards that subject with any lawer or judge...
Knowledge is power
So in another words there is no point obeying the law as people who suppose to protect us - dont know the law themselves and abuse it to their own advantages. Well done officers...
LOVING THIS GUY’S RESPONSES!!!
That was an awesome video. Showed the chosen ignorance by the cops and the chosen responses by the driver very well!
Of course , most people support the non-drinking driver’s (actually low amount of alcohol or lapsed time since drinking)
success with his drive home this night.
Thank you thank you THANK YOU!!!!!! For this great inspiring video. As always and I really mean this I truly enjoyed watching.
The DUI enforcement officer was lying by saying that the breathalyzer showed the driver almost intoxicated and played the suspicious card and the observer driving card to give the other officer the power to do whatever he wanted.
4:05 You can see that the officer's body camera is pointed directly at the tag light and you can also CLEARLY see that the light is illuminated, so this is just another excuse for pulling Ashton over based on the fact that he swerved defensively because the officer flew up on him at a high rate of speed.
So the officer first states that the breathalyzer is inadmissible as evidence in court. The he later states that field sobriety tests ARE admissible. So what he did was CONFIRM that you shouldn’t take the field sobriety test! Duh.
The blow test portable one at scene is not admissible but the "walkturn,one leg stand,and stig" test are admissible!
"Online, roadside attorney"
These cops don't like citizens knowing the law.
Wonderful. He touches that straw with a finger that was just knuckle deep in his nostril about 10 minutes before. Is there any reason they give this kind of authority to an 8th grade drop out?
I find I funny the cop could barely form a complete sentence at first. He sounded like he was drunk.
Or did he just use an alcohol based hand sanitizer?
If suspicious behavior is more accurate, the second officer's actions were very suspicious. He drove 30mph over the speed limit without activating his lights, he said "put that in your phone" then seconds later he said," pocket", which displays he can't keep his train of thought. He also forgot to put on gloves, to use the breath test, leaving all kinds of germs on the straw. Maybe he's the one who should be tested for drugs or alcohol!
Telling the driver the breath test isn't as accurate, after administering it, is exactly why they shouldn't be allowed. The other tests are EXTREMELY subjective, as was demonstrated when a Georgia officer arrested several individuals for DUI, based only on those tests, and not a breath test. Because someone took an antibiotic, he told him that could impair his driving and did a field sobriety test, failing him, and arresting him. His blood work came back 100% clean, and his chief told a newspaper that blood tests aren't as accurate as his officers training in doing field sobriety tests! That's exactly why no one should agree to a roadside field sobriety test. If you haven't been drinking, you could agree to do the breath test, to prove they had no reason to arrest you, if they do.
Cops are awarded for the most dui arrests. It doesn't matter if blood tests later determine there were no drugs or alcohol involved. It still counts as a good dui arrest! That only gives cops incentive to cheat the system and arrest innocent citizens! They don't look at them as people, whose lives they are messing up for a DUI arrest. It's very traumatic to be arrested for something you didn't do. You lose total faith in a system that is supposed to protect and serve you. No officer should be awarded anything for doing their job
Amen! Talk about completely out of control egos - some of these morons actually BELIEVE they are more accurate than a blood test. I can only imagine what their spouses and children are subjected to. THOSE sociopaths are the ones who should be institutionalized.
Only mentally disable claim blood test or breathalyzer test is more bogus than field sobriety test.
He's drunk I know sounds like me
Amen covers it as Brad Crosier said.
The DUI officer sounded drunk. Slurring speech, and messing up words.
I have so many thoughts but I will just add this one, I really appreciate what he said about hoping that it will become less suspicious behavior to protect your rights.
Profound just absolutely profound. What a world we live in now.
"You could just submit and do everything we tell you to do and it will make my life easier". Thats all i heard when the two officers were talking while writing the citation. It is not my job to make your job easier.
I felt like he swerved over to make room in case the officer wanted to pass him. That was my first thought.
Hold your lane always. Let them pass on the left. Simple. Never swerve! Ever!
@@barrysims9906 I agree. No swerving. Ever.
Yet, when a vehicle comes up fast behind me, I feel almost impelled to make way by moving over, which I suppose qualifies as swerving. It’s my way of signaling I do not intend of being in your way whatsoever, if either the other driver is rushing somewhere or I’m driving too slow at night or during inclement weather. I do move away as far as I can from the middle line, as if to say “Be my guest…pass freely and easily.
I get that you aren’t supposed to do that tho. I really just got it now tbh. Just like you aren’t supposed to swerve for animals in the road. So thanks for mentioning it.
@@msunderstanding3198 IKR..I do as well..here in PA there's a part of the 115 that scares me coming over the mountain in bad weather its all twisty n curvy n being I made the mistake of buying a ford focus lol its a light car u can feel the wind move it..I tend to pull over alittle if someone comes racing up behind me to get out of the way..guess I won't be doing that anymore..
@@msunderstanding3198 So your just supposed to hit an animal? These laws are sickening. I mean I sneezed and jerked the wheel. I must be drunk right
Agreed
After accusing people of being "roadside attorneys," the officer says, "It just makes our job harder." It actually makes it harder for the police to abuse people's rights when they know their rights under the Constitution. And too many police officers don't like it when they can't steam roll over citizens who know their rights.
We all have been driving on a deserted road at night and been surprised when someone is suddenly behind you....knowing the only way that is possible is that were greatly exceeding the speed limit. It's obvious to me why the driver moved over the fog line....he was distracted by the vehicle behind him that shouldn't have been there in the first place.
We all know what needs to happen to get any real change!!!
The cops were lying and digging from the start and knew they had no case.
Of course not. But people are stupid and cops are experts at getting them to confess. Did you notice how the driver stated he wouldn't answer any questions, then allows the cop to engage him in incriminating conversation.
Cop: "Well you definitely have had a little bit of alcohol tonight"
Driver: OK. Really?
Then the driver start to converse with the cop as if he's his friend. Stop socialize with cops. He's not trying to be your friend.
Imagine how many drunk drivers were speeding around town while these 2 cops were busy harassing an innocent guy...
you have to remember that the police can actually legally lie to you. I truly hope you took these guys to court to show that the second officer broke speed laws safety laws to get to you to tell you you broke the law he thought!
There is a distinction between lying as part of an investigation and false official statements. If a cop tells me I'm legally required to do something, then I do it despite not being legally required to, I'm much more likely to get any evidence produced dismissed, since that lie turns the request into a demand. If a cop tells another cop something about me that's untrue, it becomes a hoax, defamation, slander, etc.
Now, far too few jurisdictions do anything to cops who cause these problems, but there is a legal distinction here.
Love how everytime someone knows their rights they say their being difficult. It’s sad that people like this exist in the world. Unfortunately things will never change and police will never learn.
I’m a gosh at how universal this kind of behavior with law-enforcement is all across America. This was a reach on the law-enforcement side. The introduction of cameras have made a world of difference.. I Camera doesn’t lie.
I like how nobody brought up the fact that the stopping officer was racing up the road and in defense there guy moved to not impede passage or be rear ended.
it was mentioned by LL at the beginning of the video
@@MrNabmilf in Tulsa ok early 80s. My friends and left a bar on 11th st. I was in the backseat. A police car passed us on the right, got in front and slammed their brakes causing us to rear-end them. We weren't speeding so it wasn't a major impact. As far as I know that was perfectly fine thing for them to do.
Is this a conspiracy? The
“DUI” Officer did NOT observe the driving.
Yup....conspiracy against rights under the color of law....a felony and treasonous.
There’s no incentive to do your job right when you have qualified immunity.
Those field sobriety tests are horrible. I did it once after sleeping in my car on a cold night and the wind was blowing over 34mph. Never could have passed. Took the breathalyzer and blew 0. Still arrested and had blood drawn, came up clean. All charges dropped. I should have never done that field sobriety test.
You got arrested because cops get off on attempting to ruin someone else's life. But, when they get caught doing something they are the biggest cry babies you have ever seen.
@@bowalle7623 Yup, really it felt like they had nothing to do, didn't have anything to get me on and just couldn't let it go.
“Doesn’t improve any outcomes.” For them. Says the guy who is trying to arrest this guy. Good lord.
So the crime is...literally nothing.
Every day
Subjective view that tag light was not sufficient. That is BS without an objective standard.
both cops violated his rights and should be fired.
Copsplaining is punishment enough!!!! He’s paid for his crime of avoiding crazy speeding cop.
When we use our rights to protect ourselves that means we are being difficult, and making their job harder? They are suppose to UPHOLD our rights not STOMP on them!
These videos are great very educational. For years people thought they just had to comply to these tyrants. But with these videos it shows how to handle situations with your rights being exercised I've had plenty of practice myself
Sounds like nobody holds them accountable when they should be held to the highest standards of accountability!
They LOVE to LIE about what you’ve done, all while they’re breaking laws, & violating traffic code!
Sounds to me like that cop spends to much time online, talking about FAKEBOOK, & searching for his name… 🤦♂️