Happy Monday guys! How do you feel about the future of the CX-5? Seems silly to us for Mazda to offer both the CX-5 and CX-50. We've always loved this model, but the new CX-50 is better looking, offers more space and better tech, and more features. We also expect the hybrid version of the CX-50 to show up later this year.
@@PhillyFan20 Why should a pretty design change just because it's long in the tooth? Want to see a bad example of that philosophy? See the BMW E38 to E65 design change. Went from timeless beauty to bangle butt ugly all because the E38 was getting "long in the tooth". This Mazda CX-5 has a clean classy design that has aged really well over the years.
The 2021 Grand Touring I’ve driven feels very premium and solid as a rock. It is a bit cramped and despite all the technology nannies I’m not used to, does look and feel like an older design. Base engine is also underwhelming.
He may say it's the worst infotainment but that's pretty subjective. Just his opinion. I personally don't mind it not being a touch screen and instead using the very high quality wheel. It's much safer and a choice mazda has made. They're not "behind" that's a ridiculous take. They've said they don't like touch screens while the vehicle is moving, so it's a choice.
Exactly, I own a Mazda 3 and that infotainment is the easiest infotainment to use. Having the car for an extended period of time it becomes muscle memory to navigate the menus and it is just so easy. It seems that the only larger car reviewer that understands that is The Topher.
@@Modnar621 yeah, I think it's exactly because they test so many cars. In just a week of using the system you get used to the rotary knob and never want to use the touchscreen, I wouldn't want to go back!
As someone who currently works on these Mazdas… i will say this, i will stick with the CX5. Owning my second and my daughter has one for college. These vehicles are highly reliable. Although i can appreciate your review, you do not own these long term. Easy to say this brand and that brand have this much more than the cx5. As you promote the cx50, would stay away from it. As i like having steady work, i still feel be honest is important to my friends and future customers! CX50 has “issues” before and after the sale. Go easy on “aging” models….. 🤫 they are better.
Do you have the NA engines on your CX-5s or the Turbo Charged and what are your thoughts on the turbo if you've owned one. I'm wondering if the extra $$$ if worth it for the turbo.
Also, to add to this, the CX-5 meets the new IIHS safety standard test that just came out they are doing now, it passes it, it was the first car to pass it, and Mazda did this before the test was even finalized and put into practice, so yes, CX-5 is a very very safe car.
@@buzztrucker turbo is definitely worth it! I’ve had both the turbo and naturally aspirated 2.5. The turbo has so much more power and you only lose about 1 mpg overall
You can always tell when someone hasn’t spent much time with the Mazda infotainment system. Not only is it much safer to use while driving, it also works extremely well with the command knob. You just have to spend a little time with it to get familiar with it. Once you do, you don’t even have to look at the screen to do what you want.
There's a reason BMW/MB/Audi have since moved to add touchscreen capability in the infotainment being the originators of the control wheel. Lexus caved, acura still holds out tho.
I agree. I’ve heard the reason they are hesitant to go to a touchscreen is because they feel it’s more distracting. I can confirm this to be true. Especially in cars with terribly unresponsive touchscreens. If I take my eyes off the road for even three seconds to try and activate the shitty screen I’m already drifting out of my lane. The dial switch may not be most contemporary but way more driver friendly.
@@millerliteguru it's clear you've never used it. It's not always the easiest to select an icon with your finger while you're driving. Using a knob to select an icon is much easier.
I compared the CX-5 Turbo to the Audi 3, BMW x1, and the Lexus Rx/nx all of which are 10k more for the equivalent (based on my pricing in Canada). I agree with many of your points, especially the seating that needs to be addressed. I believe the CX-70 will address many of these issues, one of which is leg space in the back. However, the CX-5 Turbo is, in my opinion, the best bang for buck when it comes to interior fit and finish and overall driving dynamics.
And not everyone needs lots of legroom; I own the CX-5, I’m 6’5” tall and don’t have issues but I don’t haul passengers in front or back. A lot of people know Mazdas are smaller inside and for those that need more space there are other choices. I also have a Mazda 3. It also works fine but it depends on individual lifestyle. Mazda is beginning to address the interior space by now offering the new CX-90 that’s coming to dealers in a few months. And it’s longer.
Not sure the point of this review. Yes it’s getting old but is still a great, quality vehicle that is fun to drive. Also, count me in as another CX-5 owner who completely disagrees with your take on the infotainment screen. It is safer to use when driving, works great, and you never have fingerprints on your screen! 🎉🎉
I have to agree with most here. I have the 2023 Turbo CX-5 and the infotainment system is not terrible. Just because it’s not a touchscreen?? I love mine and it is intuitive. Plus. NO FINGERPRINTS! Most of us like that. A lot.
It is a touchscreen.....go to settings /go to vehicle /go to connectivity / scroll to the bottom and find 'TOUCHSCREEN ACTIVE IN MOTION ' click yes and you have it ....all these reviewers say no Mazda touchscreen , too bad they don't take the time to learn about what they speak.
I'm glad that Mazda continues to resist touchscreens; I like their system better than any of the others I've used, and it's good to still have the choice.
The CX-5 is great value. You can't find a vehicle with as many features for the price, especially when comared to luxury brands. It's also the last of its generation so it's super reliable and buttoned down, you can't say that about the CX-50 right now. Also, many car reviewers have been commenting about how uncomfortable the CX-50 seats are. The CX-5 is still made in Japan and has an independent rear suspension unlike the CX-50. "It only has a 6-speed transmission" but it's a skyactive 6-speed and that's special. It may not get as good fuel economy as some of it's competitors, but it's not far off and it's still good fuel economy for this class of vehicle. It also earned the highest safety rating of all vehicles in it's class (out of 20 small SUV's) tested by the IIHS and was the only one to pass the new side impact test. Its infotainment is solid. That dial is something you see in luxury brands too. Not having a touch screen means no fingerprints, it's easier to use and safer while driving. The CX-5 drives better than it's competitors, most of which have CVT's. Personally, I'd gladly trade the better driving dynamics you'd find in the CX-5 than slightly more space (back seat & cargo area) that you'd find in other Compact SUV's, but by all accounts this is a great vehicle for small families too. Also, I'm not a fan of digital displays until they get better so the (mostly) analog gauges in the CX-5 are perfect IMO. It's a handsome vehicle whose looks will stand the test of time. The new CX-50 looks like the outgoing Rav4 which is not very original (sorry Mazda). I would never ever buy the first iteration of a new vehicle because they still have kinks that need working out. I think the CX-5 being smaller than the CX-50 and some of it's competitors is a benefit too. It'll be easier to maneuver and park in busy parking lots or at home where space is at a premium. It's Mazda's best-seller for a reason. This car is a dying breed. The last of a great generation of Compact SUV's. I have nothing against the CX-50 (or other small SUV's) but since it was so heavily compared ... It may be newer than the outgoing CX-5, but it definitely isn't better.
EVERY SINGLE PERSON I've talked to about my car say "That, that is what I want, the crystal soul red, the white leather seats, perfect". And there is NOTHING wrong with this SUV, & anyone that talks about the cargo space being small is a paid shill to hate on it.
You pointed out “faux stitching” a few times when in reality there is zero faux stitching in the cabin. It’s all real stitching, real thread - not a plastic molded stitch that’s trying to look like the real thing. Also, the wood trim is genuine wood trim/veneer.
I had 2017 CX-5 and now have 2021 CX-5, I understand everyone has their own opinions but every time I watch a Mazda Review the infotainment always gets bad comments, I completely disagree with the statement that “Mazda has the worse infotainment.” I actually think it is great! It is easy to use, and for people who actually take the time and read the manual there are shortcuts that aid in making it a good system. I also have 2016 MX-5 and just bought my mother a CX-50, so you could say I am a Mazda loyalist…
It's not too bad, but the Tom Tom based nav is not good. My Andriod Auto nav gets me to my destination much more accurately, but unfortunately if doesn't work with the head up display so I lose that feature. It's very easy to enter address into Android, but the Mazda nav is cumbersome.
I bought the 2023 CX-5 Select in December. I went to my dealership to buy the CX50. I sat inside and thought the roof line was lower, making the windows smaller. So I tried the CX-5 and thought it was perfect. Mazda will be making a mistake if they discontinue this vehicle
@@gordmonteath6090If I'm a salesman trying to sell cx90 I'll be saying the same thing. It will be same length as cx60 but bit wider. There is no logic or reason to make cx70 same length as cx90. The CX-5 is easily their bread and butter and look how big it is.
RAV4 handling isn't even in the same league as the CX-5. I do agree that the handling is slightly worse compared to the early years because the weight has gone from 3,300 to 3,800. CX-5 still looks better than the CX-50 because it has too much plastic cladding.
I don’t agree to your criticism of the infotainment system. I own a 2022 Miata and the system is good to use and I don’t miss a touchscreen. My scroll knobs are really easy to use.
As a current and past owner for Mazdas and a lease holder of this model… I love the command knob! It just takes a day a to get used to. Then it’s muscle memory and a clean screen free of prints and you can keep your eyes on the road. Mazda is intentional about their safety and choice to employ the command knob.
I have the 23 premium plus non turbo and love it. Plenty of power, good mpg, and it is quiet and smooth. Love the stereo and ventilated seats. Purchased for $35,000.
"Touch screen" is annoying and a distraction when driving. I'm glad Mazda still have the rotary dial to navigate the infotainment system. I'm so annoyed by the car review media members about this safety feature! I drive a Mazda CX-30! Safety first! Kudos, Mazda!
I love this car more than any other SUV in the market. The design on and out is outstanding to my taste not to mention the reliability of Mazda engine.
My reason for buying the CX-5 turbo; Mazda has been making that model for years; all the bugs are worked out. Reliability on anything post-Covid has been pretty bad lately; Mazda has this model buttoned down. Reliability matters too ! Love your channel, been watching your mainstream auto reviews for years. Keep up the great work.
Geez broken record with the touch screen stuff. my god dude just understand its for safety reasons and not everyone in the world can handle talking on the phone and driving let alone dealing with a touch screen. Its a great suv and car company.
Other than wireless car play/android auto, Mazda infotainments are top class. No touchscreen, simple menus, and the rotary wheel controls that are best in multiple classes. seriously it's so simple and just works.
They look horrendous. It takes away from the interior. It looks like they glued an old GPS on the dashboard. Floating tablets look are the worst thing new trend that all manufacturers are doing.
I love ❤️ my 2020 Mazda CX-5 grand touring with the N/A engine. Even though no turbo I got a lot of great features for the money, and she's made in Japan !!! 👍🏼🔥😍
I don’t understand why reviewers are so obsessed with how much speeds is in a transmission. 6spd, 8spd, 10spd they still reach max gear at around the same mph. But more gears means more gear hunting and wear on the transmission. If there’s anything to complain about is the speed and smoothness in which the gears shift.
What individual in 2023 doesn't have a smart phone that has the ability to use either android auto or apple carplay? Do we really care about the manufacturer's UI outside of android auto and apple carplay? Seems to be a minor gripe.
Worst infotainment system? I think it’s very easy to use and straight forward. Just because it doesn’t have touch screen doesn’t make it worse and it gets the job done. The touch command system is way more efficient and safer than using a touchscreen.
You have got to get over the infotainment. It's awesome. No Mazda owners want to lean forward and take their eyes off the road. It works amazing with Android Auto and Apple Carplay.
My only compliant is the price….knock off $2-$4k and Mazda can continue selling this model for another decade. Reliable, attractive, and low cost of ownership.
I’m glad the CX-5 doesn’t have a touch screen as I’m not a fan of finger prints. Ever have an aging pano sunroof? Lots of squeaks and rattles. Six speed is far better than a CVT or 8/9/10 speeds as they’re constantly shifting for another gear. The vast majority of drivers have no need for paddle shifters. Not all of us older drivers need a large backseat or cargo hold.
Update: Since March, I’ve been enjoying my ‘23 Eternal Blue (great color!) CX-5 Signature. No, it’s not the most modern compact SUV, but is so good in so many ways. Don’t need the 8/9 or CVT transmission; troublesome pano sunroof, and regular gas saves $1/gallon. Who needs the extra power? Unused and faddish paddle shifters. Very comfy. Highly recommended if you don’t need much back seat or cargo room.
It’s aged really well imo. That interior is beautiful for the class and it even puts some luxury cuvs to shame Plus the performance even matches cuvs like the Lexus nx350 and infiniti qx50
I get lost on caring about the infotainment system. Can it play music off my phone and it does it work with Apple/Google maps to give me directions when I need it. Oh and a backup camera so I don’t hit anything. I would probably go for a used one with the older smaller screen if I got a big enough discount. I drove a 2016 CX-5 on trip and couldn’t believe how much fun it was. It needed a little more power but they solved that with turbo
Is it just me or does this guy tone sound like he hates this car? I am use to paid shills loving things they're trying to push, I guess Mazda isn't paying for any shills, & he is being paid from another car maker.
@@mmr0221 and, if you were ever a Star Trek fan, Season 3 of Picard wasn't touched by Alex Kurtzman. It was made by Terry Matalas, a true Star Trek fan, some have seen the whole season, no bait & switch, no "The Message", no crying, no victims, nothing at all cult.
I completely disagree with your opinion on the infotainment software. The rotary dial makes it far easier to use, especially when driving. It takes 5 min to understand and us owners are perfectly fine with. What customers are you talking about?
I long the Deep Crystal Mica Blue! I wish the interior had a lighter peanut butter shade of Nappa brown leather & lighter colors on the doors for heat reduction on high traffic touch points
@M for the turbo charged engine, if you want the extra power, yes, you need premium. It’s literally in all the marketing material and in the owners manual.
@@svalbard01well the Audi q3 is very reliable if you don’t for go the lowest model or what I’ve had for 4 years and hasn’t let me down is a 2019 glc super reliable it has 120k miles and rides like I kept up with my maintenance my girlfriend has q5 which is bit bigger than the q3 she bought at 60k miles no issues it had 80k it’s doing good so far
@@bradyaradgamer1630 Nice. Yeah, I've heard good things about the GLC and reliability. Just wasn't sure about the smaller Audi SUVs. Thanks for the info!
22,000 miles on my CX-5 Touring (Select). No problems. Just great memories and an awesome car. This is probably the best new car I've ever bought, and probably the only time I bought the best in its class at the time of the purchase (With all due respect to the CR-V and RAV4).
I have a ‘22 CX-5 Signature and I think it’s a great car. I actually like the rotary knob for the infotainment system, rather than having a touchscreen with all of the fingerprint smudges. I will admit that while the Nappa leather seats are fine, I do get some fatigue while driving the CX-5 for an extended period of time. It’s not bad, though. I pretty much love everything else about the car. The turbo gives it plenty of power, the Bose audio system is great to my ears, and having all the bells and whistles with the top trim is icing on the cake. I will say, though, that I believe Mazda will faze the CX-5 out within the next few years. It just doesn’t fit with the direction they’re heading as a company. The CX-70 will basically be the CX-5’s luxury SUV successor, and the CX-50 will appeal to those who want a more rugged, off-roading vehicle. Even though the CX-5 is Mazda’s best seller, I don’t see it as being part of their long term plans anymore.
Get a 1" thick latex cushion from Amazon. Makes a big difference. It must be latex and not some other foam. I believe it's about $35 and well worth it. Latex pretty much never wears out while other materials last a couple of years or so.
Concerning the drivetrain, one person's "dated" is anothers "tried, true and reliable". Yes Mazda's Skyactiv 2.5l mated to a 6 speed conventional auto has its roots all the way back in 2014, but instead of trying to stay on the cutting edge Mazda has simply improved and refined that formula..and added an optional turbo that provides enough torque for even their largest 3 row SUV. I love the fact you can get the same Engine the CX-9 uses in the much smaller, lighter Mazda 3. In fact I voted with my own money and now proudly own a 2021 turbo hatch😎 Sure the Civic may be the better overall car (subjective) and the Toyota Corolla gets much better gas mileage...but neither have the unique look and feel of the Mazda 3. To me it answers the question of "what if you mated Italian design studio style with Japanese build quality and reliability?" I think the current Mazda 3 (both hatch and sedan) answer that question in the best way possible. Of course I was able to secure my car back during the pandemic when people were afraid to go outside much less car shop..and right before car prices went totally insane. I got a great deal for a great little car that I won't be looking to replace anytime soon. Is it perfect? No, but such a beast doesn't exist in the car world, but the Mazda 3 turbo in hatchback form is close enough for my needs. Oh, and if I needed a crossover it would be a CX-5 or CX-50. Mazda just suits my sense of style better than anything produced by the other Japanese/Korean/American/Euro makers.
I think the design language of the CX-90 is an indication of the direction Mazda is taking. The CX-50 went too butch, and it didn't have any upgrades in the engine or powertrain over the CX-5. I wish the CX-5 would evolve faster into the CX-90 design language. I think it's a good balance of the squarish lines without the unnecessary butch posturing. The naturally aspirated 4-cyclinder engine is fast enough for most drivers in traffic, and saves you a lot of money. That 4-cylinder does not strain, when you're going up an incline at highway speeds and when you need to pass. What is odd is that Mazda changes the leather upholstery every year. 2021 had the best leather in my opinion, among not just the past models but even the more recent models. Also, you might not need the Signature trim. Mazda, to its immense credit, has add-on factory packages that are an excellent addition to whatever lower model you are getting.
3 things that this guy got wrong: First, its handling easily surpasses anything else in its class. Secondly, the infotainment system is just fine; though a touchscreen would be a great addition, the current control setup is safer to use when you're driving. Lastly, objectively speaking, the CX5 is significantly more aesthetically pleasing than the CX50.
@@NileshR12 go for the CX5. I went for it for only two reasons First is that it is going to cost less than NX and RDX but gets you a lot and second, I disliked that touch pad of NX and RDX like using a laptop where you’d wish you had a mouse.
I drive an older CX-5 AWD. I personally like the older styling more, potentially because it has 17" rims. In 100k miles I've changed tires, spark plugs, rear brakes and the battery. Other than that just oil and air filter. Super reliable car that I've used to tow, haul over 1000lbs and drive cross country. I've been in super sketchy situations on trails alongside Toyota Tacomas. I've ripped off plastic in numerous places scraping rocks, but fortunately all that stuff is inexpensive and easy to replace yourself. I don't know why Mazda went with the turbo engine. My 2.5L naturally aspirated engine has a compression ratio of 13.0 and feels great driving. On my current tank I'm getting 33.3 MPG, mostly highway. If I were replacing my Mazda today I'd get the RAV4 Hybrid.
I'm old school, I like the analog dash. Still overall the superior option in the segment. You don't even need the top trim to make it feel premium. Will the PHEV limited to the CX50?
He’s not wrong. The cx5 is really upscale for it’s class. The interior is on par w some luxury cuvs and the styling looks like an elegant luxury car. So if anything it’s your comment that needs to be removed or edited
I learned that deep in the settings in the cx 90, there is a way to make the infotainment screen fully touchable screen. A RUclipsr who reviewed the car at its reveal asked an employee that, and that's what they said. Kinda wish they would put the touch screen on all models, and an interior refresh would be nice also. Good review!
Not the same at all. CX-5 another feel, more premium. Nothing like the CX-50. Way too much plastic. In and out. Difference made in Japan and made in USA. It shows
We just love our 2023 CX6 Signature. Cargo space/back seat space are No Problem…it’s just my Wife $ I. Love the cute/sporty design. The power is fun. Handles perfectly. MPG is ok considering it’s a Turbo. NO REGRETS 😃
The CX-5 is turning into the VW Beetle of SUV/CUVs. It''s not competing against anything at this point, it just is what it is. Homerun design concept and execution. It is one of those cars where in a few years you will be wishing you had the ability to still buy brand new.
The CX-5 was one of the first car review videos I ever watched on RUclips, and yours was one of the first I watched. Congratulations on such a long and successful car review channel.
I have a 2019 CX-5 Touring, I will say I have noticed more CX-5 on the road than ever before, I did a test drive of the CX-50 and the biggest impression that it felt in more the direction of a Truck. The way I describe the CX-5 is the interior is that of a car and the exterior of a SUV
As someone that lives with the non touch screen infotainment system, I think touchscreens are overrated. The intention is to keep you focused on the road and it works if you use it on a daily basis. I also think these reviews are getting way too luxury minded in terms of the baseline standard and should be reviewed for what segment it is competing with rather than each component having the best of the best.
I get 32 mpg on the highway. 22 in the city. Rav 4 may get better mpg but the cx 5 drives better and is more luxurious. The only SUV I would buy again.
I have a 2021.5 cx 5 GS in Canada. I love it!! I find the seats so comfortable. Maybe leatherette is better than the leather for comfort ? I have owed my CX 5 for over a year and I don’t need nor want a touch screen. I like using the knob keeps the screen clean. I drove the cx 50 and found the steering too heavy and overall drive very rough and loud. Would take my Japan made CX 5 any day.
As a happy owner of 2 CX-5's a 2015 GT and 2019 Signature, I prefer the CX-5 over the CX-50 and think it would be a BIG MISTAKE ! by Mazda to discontinue the CX-5 in the USA. It has features and design items I prefer, such as the 40/20/40 split rear seats and fully independent rear suspension and the I like being able to access the plugs and work on, and service the current 2.5 Turbo/Non-turbo four. Both of our CX-5's have been very reliable and well made. My 2019 Signature easily competes will others costing over $10,000 more. Although I wish Mazda well with it's move upmarket and In-line 6, RWD basis models, I'm not in the market for those and Mazda should not abandon the mainstream market and current customer base.
Thank you Sofyan! Your reviews are the best. You manage to provide more useful factual information than anyone else. You are the best auto RUclips journalist!
No touch-screen... maybe improve your hand-eye coordination? I can keep my eyes on the road while using my R hand... it's easy. Touch-screens get greasy little fingerprints all over them anyhow.
What I love about his reviews is how detailed he is. He and another RUclipsr are my favorite car reviewers and my reference for when I start looking at cars.
Mazda DID listen to their customers re infotainment vis a vis touchscreen. Easy to check. You should have. They talk extensively about this. Safety vs. touchscreen is their goal.
This generation CX-5 is a rock solid and premium feeling car, but has gotten to that point where it’s nearing the end of its run. Every car generation gets to that point when it’s been around for several years and doesn’t feel like the latest or greatest anymore.
I’m always confused when you say “feaux stitching”. The injection molded plastic is stitched, there’s actual thread in the French seam design, it’s just not actually wrapped and stitched together in pleather or leather. Fake stitching imo would be like what you’d find in some of the current mustang where the cowls have a fake thread appearance in the molded plastic
I test drove both the cx-50 turbo and the cx-5 turbo yesterday. I disagree with your assessment. I felt the cx-50 drove more like a truck where the cx-5 was very smooth. I think it is because of the larger tires, didn't like the rugged ride. However, i did like the interior layout of the cx-50 better. The arm rest center console is awesome in the cx-50 and poor in the cx-5. Ended up getting a used cx-5 signature that was 3 months old and had 700 miles. Paid no where near the $41,000 price tag of a new one. On your 0-60 test it looked like you were in normal instead of sport which could effect the time. And were you using reg or premium gas? Totally agree with the infotainment system. I am still trying to figure it out and it is super frustrating to use. Hopefully in time it will become easier to use.
I also disagreed with much of this review, especially the comparison to the CX-50. The CX-5 is better looking and the interior is a step up compared to the CX-50, which is based on the Mazda 3 platform. I owned a 2018 for 4 years and traded it in on a new 2023. The Mazda entertainment system is absolutely a joy to use once you learn the knob and buttons. Long distance drives are much more enjoyable when the right hand can control everything without needing to reach for the screen. This reviewer’s take on the infotainment makes me cringe, TBH.
Torsion Beam in the CX-50? If so, "come on Mazda"...change that to multi-link. My wish is to have a redesign of the CX-5 and add Toyota's Hybrid system. I see many females driving the CX-5. They prefer the "unmasculine look" and not the "masculine look" of the CX-50. I believe Mazda will make a huge mistake in taking away their BEST seller. If that is the case I will look at the Subaru Forester.
I test drove the forester, CX-5, CX-50. Whatever piqued your interest with the CX-5 you will not find in the Subaru forester. I think the soft-road vehicles are just what the market is trending at currently. A lot of competitors are plastering their cars with black plastic cladding.
@@grifster981234567890 Grifster...seats are too narrow in most Mazdas. I sat in a CX-30 the other day. Felt like I was sitting in the cockpit of an F-14. Based on the 3 (which is a great-looking vehicle) it was difficult ingressing and egressing. Will wait and see what the newly designed '24 Camry Hybrid looks like. From early diagrams looks nice. I would settle for the 47MPGs too.
My first cx5 was purchased in 2012 as a 2013 model, touring. I put 221,000 miles on it with no issues except regular maintenance and a coil pack going out at 213k. Replaced it with a 2021 AWD touring. Hopefully it will be as reliable as the first one.
Test drove a 2020 cx5 Gt and found the front seats too short under thigh...it was nice...Navy over white leather. Ended up with 2020 stinger GT line with 11,500 miles! Love our choice!
It’s very obvious that you drove this car for a day at the most, and you have an extreme bias towards electric cars. Touch screens in cars are very hit or miss, whereas physical buttons tend to work no matter what. Not everyone want a giant tablet in their dash. I also don’t see the point in driving something that gets excellent fuel economy, but is a slog to drive and has a transmission and/or batteries that will crap the bed and make the car undriveable in 5 years.
This refresh has hoped this age like fine wine. Both the pre-refresh & post-refresh models look great. I was actually considering getting a used 2019-2020 Grand Touring Reserve or Signature along with the 2021 onwards Signature trim
If you don't buy a car every year you wont even know what is dated and what isn't because all of them are overwhelming at this point!. So I think that is an issue only testers would worry about. For everyone else coming from a 5 to 10 year old trade in, it is a huge upgrade. Mazda is taking a page from BMW keeping a successful design around and refining it. It keeps costs down for them and for us, resale value up. Rant over. We looked at a 2019 grand touring reserve with 50k miles. I think it was faster and handled better than the new 2023 signature that we ended up with but we had to have the parking sensors or we would have destroyed that 2019. . . . and it was only 5k less with a way higher interest rate, only made sense to go new. plus I know a thing or two about car dynamics to improve handling if i need to do that. (I already priced out the Bilstein's and they are cheap for this car.)
Although I am a big fan of Mazda, I test drove this and a Subaru Outback and found that even though the CX-5, on paper, had larger dimensions for the second row, the Outback felt roomier. I went for the Outback for that reason. I already have a Mazda 3, so if I want something fun to drive, I can just use that one.
I wish the Caturra Brown Nappa leather seats were a lighter shade of brown or it has that Terracotta Brown leather that the CX-50 offers, or even that new peanut butter/ saddle tan brown from the new CX-90. This Catura Brown is so dark it blends in with the black elements of the interior
Happy Monday guys! How do you feel about the future of the CX-5? Seems silly to us for Mazda to offer both the CX-5 and CX-50. We've always loved this model, but the new CX-50 is better looking, offers more space and better tech, and more features. We also expect the hybrid version of the CX-50 to show up later this year.
More changes are needed on the exterior.
It is long in the tooth, but it's still a nice car. My guess is that the CX-70 will replace it.
Mazda: how about a Signature CX-50 without all the cladding? The “rugged” look will age as fast as vinyl roofs did in the ‘70’s-‘90’s.
@@PhillyFan20 Why should a pretty design change just because it's long in the tooth? Want to see a bad example of that philosophy? See the BMW E38 to E65 design change. Went from timeless beauty to bangle butt ugly all because the E38 was getting "long in the tooth". This Mazda CX-5 has a clean classy design that has aged really well over the years.
@@danschubring7957 Yes! I would want to get that over the CX-5 Signature
Still looks classy and better than most of the competition in my opinion.
The 2021 Grand Touring I’ve driven feels very premium and solid as a rock. It is a bit cramped and despite all the technology nannies I’m not used to, does look and feel like an older design. Base engine is also underwhelming.
Agreed 95 percent of everything else in this segment looks werid and frumpy
Agreed.
And it aced the new iihs test.
Facts
He may say it's the worst infotainment but that's pretty subjective. Just his opinion. I personally don't mind it not being a touch screen and instead using the very high quality wheel. It's much safer and a choice mazda has made. They're not "behind" that's a ridiculous take. They've said they don't like touch screens while the vehicle is moving, so it's a choice.
Exactly, I own a Mazda 3 and that infotainment is the easiest infotainment to use. Having the car for an extended period of time it becomes muscle memory to navigate the menus and it is just so easy. It seems that the only larger car reviewer that understands that is The Topher.
@@Modnar621 yeah, I think it's exactly because they test so many cars. In just a week of using the system you get used to the rotary knob and never want to use the touchscreen, I wouldn't want to go back!
They are behind with this one. They just are.
These large touch screens in care are very unsafe. Also, the infotainment menu is very clean and easy to use.
Right?! I hate the "omg its not a touch-screen" complaints nowadays.
As someone who currently works on these Mazdas… i will say this, i will stick with the CX5. Owning my second and my daughter has one for college. These vehicles are highly reliable. Although i can appreciate your review, you do not own these long term. Easy to say this brand and that brand have this much more than the cx5. As you promote the cx50, would stay away from it. As i like having steady work, i still feel be honest is important to my friends and future customers! CX50 has “issues” before and after the sale. Go easy on “aging” models….. 🤫 they are better.
Newer is not always better.
Do you have the NA engines on your CX-5s or the Turbo Charged and what are your thoughts on the turbo if you've owned one. I'm wondering if the extra $$$ if worth it for the turbo.
Also, to add to this, the CX-5 meets the new IIHS safety standard test that just came out they are doing now, it passes it, it was the first car to pass it, and Mazda did this before the test was even finalized and put into practice, so yes, CX-5 is a very very safe car.
@@buzztrucker turbo is definitely worth it! I’ve had both the turbo and naturally aspirated 2.5. The turbo has so much more power and you only lose about 1 mpg overall
Cx50 made in usa and a lot of people said is trash compared to Japanese cx5
You can always tell when someone hasn’t spent much time with the Mazda infotainment system. Not only is it much safer to use while driving, it also works extremely well with the command knob. You just have to spend a little time with it to get familiar with it. Once you do, you don’t even have to look at the screen to do what you want.
There's a reason BMW/MB/Audi have since moved to add touchscreen capability in the infotainment being the originators of the control wheel. Lexus caved, acura still holds out tho.
I agree. I’ve heard the reason they are hesitant to go to a touchscreen is because they feel it’s more distracting. I can confirm this to be true. Especially in cars with terribly unresponsive touchscreens. If I take my eyes off the road for even three seconds to try and activate the shitty screen I’m already drifting out of my lane. The dial switch may not be most contemporary but way more driver friendly.
Yep, it's always frustrating to hear car reviewers talk negatively about the Mazda infotainment. It is so easy to use once you get used to it.
@@millerliteguru it's clear you've never used it. It's not always the easiest to select an icon with your finger while you're driving. Using a knob to select an icon is much easier.
This guy sucks at doing reviews. He gets paid off by certain brands
I compared the CX-5 Turbo to the Audi 3, BMW x1, and the Lexus Rx/nx all of which are 10k more for the equivalent (based on my pricing in Canada). I agree with many of your points, especially the seating that needs to be addressed. I believe the CX-70 will address many of these issues, one of which is leg space in the back. However, the CX-5 Turbo is, in my opinion, the best bang for buck when it comes to interior fit and finish and overall driving dynamics.
Retains value better and is way more reliable also.
Smarter choice 100% of the time
Uh yes, mainstream cars are better bang for the buck than luxury-branded cars
@@chekvb Luxury brands plummet in value quickly .
And not everyone needs lots of legroom; I own the CX-5, I’m 6’5” tall and don’t have issues but I don’t haul passengers in front or back. A lot of people know Mazdas are smaller inside and for those that need more space there are other choices. I also have a Mazda 3. It also works fine but it depends on individual lifestyle. Mazda is beginning to address the interior space by now offering the new CX-90 that’s coming to dealers in a few months. And it’s longer.
Not sure the point of this review. Yes it’s getting old but is still a great, quality vehicle that is fun to drive. Also, count me in as another CX-5 owner who completely disagrees with your take on the infotainment screen. It is safer to use when driving, works great, and you never have fingerprints on your screen! 🎉🎉
I have to agree with most here. I have the 2023 Turbo CX-5 and the infotainment system is not terrible. Just because it’s not a touchscreen?? I love mine and it is intuitive. Plus. NO FINGERPRINTS! Most of us like that. A lot.
It is a touchscreen.....go to settings /go to vehicle /go to connectivity / scroll to the bottom and find 'TOUCHSCREEN ACTIVE IN MOTION ' click yes and you have it ....all these reviewers say no Mazda touchscreen , too bad they don't take the time to learn about what they speak.
I'm glad that Mazda continues to resist touchscreens; I like their system better than any of the others I've used, and it's good to still have the choice.
The CX-5 is great value. You can't find a vehicle with as many features for the price, especially when comared to luxury brands. It's also the last of its generation so it's super reliable and buttoned down, you can't say that about the CX-50 right now. Also, many car reviewers have been commenting about how uncomfortable the CX-50 seats are. The CX-5 is still made in Japan and has an independent rear suspension unlike the CX-50. "It only has a 6-speed transmission" but it's a skyactive 6-speed and that's special. It may not get as good fuel economy as some of it's competitors, but it's not far off and it's still good fuel economy for this class of vehicle. It also earned the highest safety rating of all vehicles in it's class (out of 20 small SUV's) tested by the IIHS and was the only one to pass the new side impact test.
Its infotainment is solid. That dial is something you see in luxury brands too. Not having a touch screen means no fingerprints, it's easier to use and safer while driving. The CX-5 drives better than it's competitors, most of which have CVT's. Personally, I'd gladly trade the better driving dynamics you'd find in the CX-5 than slightly more space (back seat & cargo area) that you'd find in other Compact SUV's, but by all accounts this is a great vehicle for small families too. Also, I'm not a fan of digital displays until they get better so the (mostly) analog gauges in the CX-5 are perfect IMO.
It's a handsome vehicle whose looks will stand the test of time. The new CX-50 looks like the outgoing Rav4 which is not very original (sorry Mazda). I would never ever buy the first iteration of a new vehicle because they still have kinks that need working out. I think the CX-5 being smaller than the CX-50 and some of it's competitors is a benefit too. It'll be easier to maneuver and park in busy parking lots or at home where space is at a premium. It's Mazda's best-seller for a reason. This car is a dying breed. The last of a great generation of Compact SUV's. I have nothing against the CX-50 (or other small SUV's) but since it was so heavily compared ... It may be newer than the outgoing CX-5, but it definitely isn't better.
Well said from a fellow CX-5 owner👍
I’m on my 5 Mazda and 2nd CX-5 and I agree with all of your points! You are as passionate about Mazda CX-5 as I am!
Agree
@@thetechlibrarian oh yea? Good deal. You are very smart for buying yourself a Mazda.
You really hit the nail on the head and I agree with you on pretty much every single point. Thus my CX-5 Turbo came home one week ago.
EVERY SINGLE PERSON I've talked to about my car say "That, that is what I want, the crystal soul red, the white leather seats, perfect". And there is NOTHING wrong with this SUV, & anyone that talks about the cargo space being small is a paid shill to hate on it.
This blue in this video would have been my second choice, but screw that, I am a Republican, & the resale for a red car is higher!
You pointed out “faux stitching” a few times when in reality there is zero faux stitching in the cabin. It’s all real stitching, real thread - not a plastic molded stitch that’s trying to look like the real thing.
Also, the wood trim is genuine wood trim/veneer.
HIs review was underwhelming with no inspiration whatsoever. According to this review, the CX-5 is not a good vehicle, which is absolute BS.
I had 2017 CX-5 and now have 2021 CX-5, I understand everyone has their own opinions but every time I watch a Mazda Review the infotainment always gets bad comments, I completely disagree with the statement that “Mazda has the worse infotainment.” I actually think it is great! It is easy to use, and for people who actually take the time and read the manual there are shortcuts that aid in making it a good system. I also have 2016 MX-5 and just bought my mother a CX-50, so you could say I am a Mazda loyalist…
Low IQ people don't understand that
It's not too bad, but the Tom Tom based nav is not good. My Andriod Auto nav gets me to my destination much more accurately, but unfortunately if doesn't work with the head up display so I lose that feature. It's very easy to enter address into Android, but the Mazda nav is cumbersome.
Exactly why it sucks plus it looks horrendous.
I bought the 2023 CX-5 Select in December. I went to my dealership to buy the CX50. I sat inside and thought the roof line was lower, making the windows smaller. So I tried the CX-5 and thought it was perfect. Mazda will be making a mistake if they discontinue this vehicle
they will replace it with the cx-70. It's gonna be about the same as CX-5
Cx70 same length as 90
@@gordmonteath6090If I'm a salesman trying to sell cx90 I'll be saying the same thing. It will be same length as cx60 but bit wider. There is no logic or reason to make cx70 same length as cx90. The CX-5 is easily their bread and butter and look how big it is.
RAV4 handling isn't even in the same league as the CX-5. I do agree that the handling is slightly worse compared to the early years because the weight has gone from 3,300 to 3,800.
CX-5 still looks better than the CX-50 because it has too much plastic cladding.
Love the plastic cladding on all Mazda vehicles!
Rav4 will always be better
Now that is funny. 😂😂😂
@scottarmen9097 I know! The Mazda CX-5 being better lol it's funny.
I don’t agree to your criticism of the infotainment system.
I own a 2022 Miata and the system is good to use and I don’t miss a touchscreen.
My scroll knobs are really easy to use.
As a current and past owner for Mazdas and a lease holder of this model… I love the command knob! It just takes a day a to get used to. Then it’s muscle memory and a clean screen free of prints and you can keep your eyes on the road. Mazda is intentional about their safety and choice to employ the command knob.
I have the 23 premium plus non turbo and love it. Plenty of power, good mpg, and it is quiet and smooth. Love the stereo and ventilated seats. Purchased for $35,000.
The NA is my way to go too, better mpg without compromising much.
You can get a used Porsche Cayenne with that money
@@clearcut6818 but then I'll get used Cayenne reliability
@@clearcut6818 more like 6-7 years old with 70k and then spend just as much keeping it going
Does this car have cylinder deactivation?
I would rather buy the Mazda over the Honda CR-R because the Mazda doesn’t have a CVT transmission. I can’t stand CVT transmissions
This is a terrible “review” of this great car
This guy got beef with Mazda in every single review and idk why.
Hes just a narcissist
I would take the cx5 over the rav4 anyway day of the week no matter what the gas savings are.
"Touch screen" is annoying and a distraction when driving. I'm glad Mazda still have the rotary dial to navigate the infotainment system. I'm so annoyed by the car review media members about this safety feature! I drive a Mazda CX-30! Safety first! Kudos, Mazda!
Why do you have an issue with analog, what makes a digital display better. I feel there is less to go wrong with analog.
It's old technology, that's why.
I love this car more than any other SUV in the market. The design on and out is outstanding to my taste not to mention the reliability of Mazda engine.
My reason for buying the CX-5 turbo; Mazda has been making that model for years; all the bugs are worked out. Reliability on anything post-Covid has been pretty bad lately; Mazda has this model buttoned down. Reliability matters too ! Love your channel, been watching your mainstream auto reviews for years. Keep up the great work.
Geez broken record with the touch screen stuff. my god dude just understand its for safety reasons and not everyone in the world can handle talking on the phone and driving let alone dealing with a touch screen. Its a great suv and car company.
Other than wireless car play/android auto, Mazda infotainments are top class. No touchscreen, simple menus, and the rotary wheel controls that are best in multiple classes. seriously it's so simple and just works.
They look horrendous. It takes away from the interior. It looks like they glued an old GPS on the dashboard. Floating tablets look are the worst thing new trend that all manufacturers are doing.
@@FdgIV99SpaceGhost sure yea they could make it look better. I was just talking about UX
I love ❤️ my 2020 Mazda CX-5 grand touring with the N/A engine. Even though no turbo I got a lot of great features for the money, and she's made in Japan !!! 👍🏼🔥😍
They/them are made in Japan.
I don’t understand why reviewers are so obsessed with how much speeds is in a transmission. 6spd, 8spd, 10spd they still reach max gear at around the same mph. But more gears means more gear hunting and wear on the transmission. If there’s anything to complain about is the speed and smoothness in which the gears shift.
What individual in 2023 doesn't have a smart phone that has the ability to use either android auto or apple carplay? Do we really care about the manufacturer's UI outside of android auto and apple carplay? Seems to be a minor gripe.
No one cares, this guy is dishonest
Worst infotainment system? I think it’s very easy to use and straight forward. Just because it doesn’t have touch screen doesn’t make it worse and it gets the job done. The touch command system is way more efficient and safer than using a touchscreen.
I also like the fact that my screen isn't smeared with fingerprints. I also find the dial easy to use, plus I mostly use voice commands.
I’d say the worst award should go to the Acura system.
It's definitely the worst infotainment.
@@jraheemjefcoat429 Not a chance. With Android Auto's Coolwalk update it's literally perfect.
You had the A/C on when you did the 0-60 test btw, next time I'd turn off the air conditioning when doing power tests like that.
And turn of traction control
You have got to get over the infotainment. It's awesome. No Mazda owners want to lean forward and take their eyes off the road. It works amazing with Android Auto and Apple Carplay.
Couldn’t have said it better. Once you get use to it, you’ll love it.
My only compliant is the price….knock off $2-$4k and Mazda can continue selling this model for another decade. Reliable, attractive, and low cost of ownership.
I’m glad the CX-5 doesn’t have a touch screen as I’m not a fan of finger prints. Ever have an aging pano sunroof? Lots of squeaks and rattles. Six speed is far better than a CVT or 8/9/10 speeds as they’re constantly shifting for another gear. The vast majority of drivers have no need for paddle shifters. Not all of us older drivers need a large backseat or cargo hold.
Update: Since March, I’ve been enjoying my ‘23 Eternal Blue (great color!) CX-5 Signature. No, it’s not the most modern compact SUV, but is so good in so many ways. Don’t need the 8/9 or CVT transmission; troublesome pano sunroof, and regular gas saves $1/gallon. Who needs the extra power? Unused and faddish paddle shifters. Very comfy. Highly recommended if you don’t need much back seat or cargo room.
Pound for pound CX5 any day
It’s aged really well imo. That interior is beautiful for the class and it even puts some luxury cuvs to shame
Plus the performance even matches cuvs like the Lexus nx350 and infiniti qx50
It’s dated now
Ergonomics are completely compromised. Its all made from old parts
I get lost on caring about the infotainment system. Can it play music off my phone and it does it work with Apple/Google maps to give me directions when I need it. Oh and a backup camera so I don’t hit anything. I would probably go for a used one with the older smaller screen if I got a big enough discount. I drove a 2016 CX-5 on trip and couldn’t believe how much fun it was. It needed a little more power but they solved that with turbo
Nah man the Lexus drives far smoother. Mazda is fairly quiet, but the ride is bumpy af
Just wish they would give it their current interior, they are still using the interior from the 2014-2018 Mazda 3 era.
Very negative review. My wife & I just bought one…we love it !!! Most reviews I watched like it over it’s competitors
Is it just me or does this guy tone sound like he hates this car? I am use to paid shills loving things they're trying to push, I guess Mazda isn't paying for any shills, & he is being paid from another car maker.
He is being paid by Toyota. It’s obvious when you watch his reviews. He pushed a lot of EV and Hybrid stuff to be in line with the “message”
@@mmr0221 Thanks for the info, btw, damn nice pfp, just need to add The Flag to it :)
@@mmr0221 and, if you were ever a Star Trek fan, Season 3 of Picard wasn't touched by Alex Kurtzman. It was made by Terry Matalas, a true Star Trek fan, some have seen the whole season, no bait & switch, no "The Message", no crying, no victims, nothing at all cult.
CX -5 built in Japan. CX-50 built in Alabama. I'll take a Japanese car built with pride in Japan over anything built in the US.
I completely disagree with your opinion on the infotainment software. The rotary dial makes it far easier to use, especially when driving. It takes 5 min to understand and us owners are perfectly fine with. What customers are you talking about?
I dropped Mazda from my list of possible cars over the lack of a touchscreen.
I long the Deep Crystal Mica Blue! I wish the interior had a lighter peanut butter shade of Nappa brown leather & lighter colors on the doors for heat reduction on high traffic touch points
“Mazda had no idea”… Pretty sure they knew from product planning, that’s why they threw everything at it as the last bid to revitalize the company.
You think rugged = plastic body cladding 😬
I currently have a 2022 Turbo. I only put 92/93 octane in it. I get about 24-25 MPG average. And get about 330 miles on a full tank.
@M for the turbo charged engine, if you want the extra power, yes, you need premium. It’s literally in all the marketing material and in the owners manual.
Love my '22 Signature, coming out of an Audi Q3 which was equally as enjoyable.
Was the Audi mostly reliable? I've heard mixed reviews on Audi reliability.
@@svalbard01well the Audi q3 is very reliable if you don’t for go the lowest model or what I’ve had for 4 years and hasn’t let me down is a 2019 glc super reliable it has 120k miles and rides like I kept up with my maintenance my girlfriend has q5 which is bit bigger than the q3 she bought at 60k miles no issues it had 80k it’s doing good so far
@@bradyaradgamer1630 Nice. Yeah, I've heard good things about the GLC and reliability. Just wasn't sure about the smaller Audi SUVs. Thanks for the info!
Yes. Very reliable. No real issues.
You always say you’re 5’7” suddenly you’re 5’8”? What’s your secret? 😂
I noticed that, also. 🤔😂
Probably means closer to 5'6!😝
22,000 miles on my CX-5 Touring (Select). No problems. Just great memories and an awesome car. This is probably the best new car I've ever bought, and probably the only time I bought the best in its class at the time of the purchase (With all due respect to the CR-V and RAV4).
I have a ‘22 CX-5 Signature and I think it’s a great car. I actually like the rotary knob for the infotainment system, rather than having a touchscreen with all of the fingerprint smudges. I will admit that while the Nappa leather seats are fine, I do get some fatigue while driving the CX-5 for an extended period of time. It’s not bad, though. I pretty much love everything else about the car. The turbo gives it plenty of power, the Bose audio system is great to my ears, and having all the bells and whistles with the top trim is icing on the cake.
I will say, though, that I believe Mazda will faze the CX-5 out within the next few years. It just doesn’t fit with the direction they’re heading as a company. The CX-70 will basically be the CX-5’s luxury SUV successor, and the CX-50 will appeal to those who want a more rugged, off-roading vehicle. Even though the CX-5 is Mazda’s best seller, I don’t see it as being part of their long term plans anymore.
Get a 1" thick latex cushion from Amazon. Makes a big difference. It must be latex and not some other foam. I believe it's about $35 and well worth it. Latex pretty much never wears out while other materials last a couple of years or so.
Concerning the drivetrain, one person's "dated" is anothers "tried, true and reliable". Yes Mazda's Skyactiv 2.5l mated to a 6 speed conventional auto has its roots all the way back in 2014, but instead of trying to stay on the cutting edge Mazda has simply improved and refined that formula..and added an optional turbo that provides enough torque for even their largest 3 row SUV. I love the fact you can get the same Engine the CX-9 uses in the much smaller, lighter Mazda 3. In fact I voted with my own money and now proudly own a 2021 turbo hatch😎 Sure the Civic may be the better overall car (subjective) and the Toyota Corolla gets much better gas mileage...but neither have the unique look and feel of the Mazda 3. To me it answers the question of "what if you mated Italian design studio style with Japanese build quality and reliability?" I think the current Mazda 3 (both hatch and sedan) answer that question in the best way possible. Of course I was able to secure my car back during the pandemic when people were afraid to go outside much less car shop..and right before car prices went totally insane. I got a great deal for a great little car that I won't be looking to replace anytime soon. Is it perfect? No, but such a beast doesn't exist in the car world, but the Mazda 3 turbo in hatchback form is close enough for my needs.
Oh, and if I needed a crossover it would be a CX-5 or CX-50. Mazda just suits my sense of style better than anything produced by the other Japanese/Korean/American/Euro makers.
I think the design language of the CX-90 is an indication of the direction Mazda is taking. The CX-50 went too butch, and it didn't have any upgrades in the engine or powertrain over the CX-5. I wish the CX-5 would evolve faster into the CX-90 design language. I think it's a good balance of the squarish lines without the unnecessary butch posturing. The naturally aspirated 4-cyclinder engine is fast enough for most drivers in traffic, and saves you a lot of money. That 4-cylinder does not strain, when you're going up an incline at highway speeds and when you need to pass. What is odd is that Mazda changes the leather upholstery every year. 2021 had the best leather in my opinion, among not just the past models but even the more recent models. Also, you might not need the Signature trim. Mazda, to its immense credit, has add-on factory packages that are an excellent addition to whatever lower model you are getting.
5 foot 8 now? Did you grow an inch since the last video?
3 things that this guy got wrong: First, its handling easily surpasses anything else in its class. Secondly, the infotainment system is just fine; though a touchscreen would be a great addition, the current control setup is safer to use when you're driving. Lastly, objectively speaking, the CX5 is significantly more aesthetically pleasing than the CX50.
@M compared to a CRV or RAV4? No.
I absolutely hate touch screens, mazda has done it right by keeping with the rotary dail
The interior stitching is actually real, not “faux”.
Makes me miss my 2019 CX5.
Honestly, the top of the line CX5 is quite better than the entry levels of RDX and NX and also undercut the price.
I was actually cross-shopping the CX-5 with the 1st gen NX & 2019 onwards RDX
@@NileshR12 go for the CX5. I went for it for only two reasons
First is that it is going to cost less than NX and RDX but gets you a lot and second, I disliked that touch pad of NX and RDX like using a laptop where you’d wish you had a mouse.
So true.
Love my 22 Cx5 Signature, it’s been one year and have loved it! Shits on competition
@M why you keep complaining about this car in every comment
I drive an older CX-5 AWD. I personally like the older styling more, potentially because it has 17" rims. In 100k miles I've changed tires, spark plugs, rear brakes and the battery. Other than that just oil and air filter. Super reliable car that I've used to tow, haul over 1000lbs and drive cross country. I've been in super sketchy situations on trails alongside Toyota Tacomas. I've ripped off plastic in numerous places scraping rocks, but fortunately all that stuff is inexpensive and easy to replace yourself. I don't know why Mazda went with the turbo engine. My 2.5L naturally aspirated engine has a compression ratio of 13.0 and feels great driving. On my current tank I'm getting 33.3 MPG, mostly highway. If I were replacing my Mazda today I'd get the RAV4 Hybrid.
I'm old school, I like the analog dash. Still overall the superior option in the segment. You don't even need the top trim to make it feel premium. Will the PHEV limited to the CX50?
Why do you keep trying to compare the CX 5 to the Acura RDX or Genesis GV 70 it's not in they're league. Come on Baye stop it.
He’s not wrong. The cx5 is really upscale for it’s class. The interior is on par w some luxury cuvs and the styling looks like an elegant luxury car.
So if anything it’s your comment that needs to be removed or edited
Because Mazda is trying to be more “premium” in this segment. Once you fully load one out you can get an actual luxury brand for not that much more.
@@naveenthemachineit’s dated now and it’s small. CX50 is way better
@@PK-bn2pg yet the dated Mazda still has a much better rear suspension 😂
@@naveenthemachine it's not at all. It's made from used parts. Completely parts bin interior. Ergonomics are awful.
This must be the most reviewed SUV on YT.
I swear he’s reviewed this suv 20 times 😂😂😂
I learned that deep in the settings in the cx 90, there is a way to make the infotainment screen fully touchable screen. A RUclipsr who reviewed the car at its reveal asked an employee that, and that's what they said. Kinda wish they would put the touch screen on all models, and an interior refresh would be nice also. Good review!
Man i still rather have this vs the 50..maybe will change my mind.hmm. if they had a hybrid id get one.
Mazda mentioned that there will be a hybrid CX-50. It'll use Toyota's hybrid system.
Not the same at all. CX-5 another feel, more premium. Nothing like the CX-50. Way too much plastic. In and out. Difference made in Japan and made in USA. It shows
We just love our 2023 CX6 Signature. Cargo space/back seat space are No Problem…it’s just my Wife $ I. Love the cute/sporty design. The power is fun. Handles perfectly. MPG is ok considering it’s a Turbo. NO REGRETS 😃
Fuck touchscreens and the people complaining about not having them. Not everything has to be touch. You get the best of both worlds in Mazda.
mazda makes cars for adults, not ipad kids that need touch screen infotainment.
That's true but low IQ people never understand that
It looks like Mazda is sticking with the knob for a while. The Asian brands simply do not want touchscreens in their vehicles.
CX 50 has too much plastic, I want a premium city car so I’ll still take the CX-5 any day
The CX-5 is turning into the VW Beetle of SUV/CUVs. It''s not competing against anything at this point, it just is what it is. Homerun design concept and execution. It is one of those cars where in a few years you will be wishing you had the ability to still buy brand new.
Especially considering its age that it’s been able to stay so up to date
The CX-5 was one of the first car review videos I ever watched on RUclips, and yours was one of the first I watched. Congratulations on such a long and successful car review channel.
I have a 2019 CX-5 Touring, I will say I have noticed more CX-5 on the road than ever before, I did a test drive of the CX-50 and the biggest impression that it felt in more the direction of a Truck.
The way I describe the CX-5 is the interior is that of a car and the exterior of a SUV
Soft seats feel better at first but once your in them for a while firm seats feel better
As someone that lives with the non touch screen infotainment system, I think touchscreens are overrated. The intention is to keep you focused on the road and it works if you use it on a daily basis.
I also think these reviews are getting way too luxury minded in terms of the baseline standard and should be reviewed for what segment it is competing with rather than each component having the best of the best.
I get 32 mpg on the highway. 22 in the city. Rav 4 may get better mpg but the cx 5 drives better and is more luxurious. The only SUV I would buy again.
I have a 4th gen rav 4 and drove a 5th gen back to back with a 23 cx5 and it’s like night and day the rav is so loud
I have a 2021.5 cx 5 GS in Canada. I love it!! I find the seats so comfortable. Maybe leatherette is better than the leather for comfort ? I have owed my CX 5 for over a year and I don’t need nor want a touch screen. I like using the knob keeps the screen clean. I drove the cx 50 and found the steering too heavy and overall drive very rough and loud. Would take my Japan made CX 5 any day.
As a happy owner of 2 CX-5's a 2015 GT and 2019 Signature, I prefer the CX-5 over the CX-50 and think it would be a BIG MISTAKE ! by Mazda to discontinue the CX-5 in the USA. It has features and design items I prefer, such as the 40/20/40 split rear seats and fully independent rear suspension and the I like being able to access the plugs and work on, and service the current 2.5 Turbo/Non-turbo four. Both of our CX-5's have been very reliable and well made. My 2019 Signature easily competes will others costing over $10,000 more.
Although I wish Mazda well with it's move upmarket and In-line 6, RWD basis models, I'm not in the market for those and Mazda should not abandon the mainstream market and current customer base.
The cx50 is probably more appealing to the average person but the cx5 is something special and will go down as a classic
Thank you Sofyan! Your reviews are the best. You manage to provide more useful factual information than anyone else. You are the best auto RUclips journalist!
No touch-screen... maybe improve your hand-eye coordination?
I can keep my eyes on the road while using my R hand... it's easy. Touch-screens get greasy little fingerprints all over them anyhow.
What I love about his reviews is how detailed he is. He and another RUclipsr are my favorite car reviewers and my reference for when I start looking at cars.
He nitpicks shit he doesn't understand. He's completely clueless as to Mazda owners and the infotainment opinions.
I buy a vehicle to drive not because it has a fancy infotainment display. Not to mention if I'm worried about going 0-60 I would be drag racing.
Everyone rags on the 6speed but short of a zf8 speed it’s one of the best feeling auto trans out there and 6 gears is enough for a manual?
Interior looks exactly the same as my 2018 CX-5 🤦
Mazda DID listen to their customers re infotainment vis a vis touchscreen. Easy to check. You should have. They talk extensively about this. Safety vs. touchscreen is their goal.
I might be the only one that doesn’t like touch screen in vehicles. I hate the splotches and finger prints left on it.
This generation CX-5 is a rock solid and premium feeling car, but has gotten to that point where it’s nearing the end of its run. Every car generation gets to that point when it’s been around for several years and doesn’t feel like the latest or greatest anymore.
I’m always confused when you say “feaux stitching”. The injection molded plastic is stitched, there’s actual thread in the French seam design, it’s just not actually wrapped and stitched together in pleather or leather. Fake stitching imo would be like what you’d find in some of the current mustang where the cowls have a fake thread appearance in the molded plastic
I test drove both the cx-50 turbo and the cx-5 turbo yesterday. I disagree with your assessment. I felt the cx-50 drove more like a truck where the cx-5 was very smooth. I think it is because of the larger tires, didn't like the rugged ride. However, i did like the interior layout of the cx-50 better. The arm rest center console is awesome in the cx-50 and poor in the cx-5. Ended up getting a used cx-5 signature that was 3 months old and had 700 miles. Paid no where near the $41,000 price tag of a new one. On your 0-60 test it looked like you were in normal instead of sport which could effect the time. And were you using reg or premium gas? Totally agree with the infotainment system. I am still trying to figure it out and it is super frustrating to use. Hopefully in time it will become easier to use.
I also disagreed with much of this review, especially the comparison to the CX-50. The CX-5 is better looking and the interior is a step up compared to the CX-50, which is based on the Mazda 3 platform. I owned a 2018 for 4 years and traded it in on a new 2023. The Mazda entertainment system is absolutely a joy to use once you learn the knob and buttons. Long distance drives are much more enjoyable when the right hand can control everything without needing to reach for the screen. This reviewer’s take on the infotainment makes me cringe, TBH.
Torsion Beam in the CX-50? If so, "come on Mazda"...change that to multi-link. My wish is to have a redesign of the CX-5 and add Toyota's Hybrid system. I see many females driving the CX-5. They prefer the "unmasculine look" and not the "masculine look" of the CX-50. I believe Mazda will make a huge mistake in taking away their BEST seller. If that is the case I will look at the Subaru Forester.
I test drove the forester, CX-5, CX-50. Whatever piqued your interest with the CX-5 you will not find in the Subaru forester. I think the soft-road vehicles are just what the market is trending at currently. A lot of competitors are plastering their cars with black plastic cladding.
@@grifster981234567890 Grifster...seats are too narrow in most Mazdas. I sat in a CX-30 the other day. Felt like I was sitting in the cockpit of an F-14. Based on the 3 (which is a great-looking vehicle) it was difficult ingressing and egressing. Will wait and see what the newly designed '24 Camry Hybrid looks like. From early diagrams looks nice. I would settle for the 47MPGs too.
@@peterc.jordan2420Wait on cx50 hybrid. It will use Toyota hybrid drivetrain. Best of both worlds.
The interior needs multicolor ambient lighting strips in the doors & dashboard to make this look & feel more premium & upscale
My first cx5 was purchased in 2012 as a 2013 model, touring. I put 221,000 miles on it with no issues except regular maintenance and a coil pack going out at 213k. Replaced it with a 2021 AWD touring. Hopefully it will be as reliable as the first one.
Test drove a 2020 cx5 Gt and found the front seats too short under thigh...it was nice...Navy over white leather. Ended up with 2020 stinger GT line with 11,500 miles! Love our choice!
It’s very obvious that you drove this car for a day at the most, and you have an extreme bias towards electric cars. Touch screens in cars are very hit or miss, whereas physical buttons tend to work no matter what. Not everyone want a giant tablet in their dash. I also don’t see the point in driving something that gets excellent fuel economy, but is a slog to drive and has a transmission and/or batteries that will crap the bed and make the car undriveable in 5 years.
Hate to think that Mazda would kill this model. It's their best selling vehicle, and I don't think the CX50 is selling at CX5 volume.
This refresh has hoped this age like fine wine. Both the pre-refresh & post-refresh models look great. I was actually considering getting a used 2019-2020 Grand Touring Reserve or Signature along with the 2021 onwards Signature trim
If you don't buy a car every year you wont even know what is dated and what isn't because all of them are overwhelming at this point!. So I think that is an issue only testers would worry about. For everyone else coming from a 5 to 10 year old trade in, it is a huge upgrade. Mazda is taking a page from BMW keeping a successful design around and refining it. It keeps costs down for them and for us, resale value up. Rant over. We looked at a 2019 grand touring reserve with 50k miles. I think it was faster and handled better than the new 2023 signature that we ended up with but we had to have the parking sensors or we would have destroyed that 2019. . . . and it was only 5k less with a way higher interest rate, only made sense to go new. plus I know a thing or two about car dynamics to improve handling if i need to do that. (I already priced out the Bilstein's and they are cheap for this car.)
Although I am a big fan of Mazda, I test drove this and a Subaru Outback and found that even though the CX-5, on paper, had larger dimensions for the second row, the Outback felt roomier. I went for the Outback for that reason. I already have a Mazda 3, so if I want something fun to drive, I can just use that one.
The Outback has a longer trunk, but not as tall. It has a more practical trunk space, IMO.
The infotainment system is great. Too much complaining about it.
This refresh has hoped this age like fine wine.
I wish the Caturra Brown Nappa leather seats were a lighter shade of brown or it has that Terracotta Brown leather that the CX-50 offers, or even that new peanut butter/ saddle tan brown from the new CX-90. This Catura Brown is so dark it blends in with the black elements of the interior
the cx-50 needs the signature trim again