He didn’t actually answer the question asked, examples of kalaam from ITs books. Refuting asharis isn’t what is meant by kalaam, IT didn’t build his aqeedah on kalaam.
Point your blame at things that are haram not at things that are halal. Especially regarding the people who have sacrificed more for the deen than you have.
@@4SunniSchools what havent i sacrificed? born Muslims when they see a new muslim like me say how much more you know because you were born Muslim? May Allah guide you and me.
You need to interview actual Hanbalis, not the neo Hanbalites. Try experts like Ahmed Al Gharib, Walid Al Meneesi, Dr. Karim Al Hilmy, Alaa Hasan Ismail... This shaykh trashes 'salafis', yet his 1st Hanbali ijaza or any are from Sh. Walid Al Meneesi. He tries to rewrite the history of Hanbalis and Asharis...
I don't know why you call yourself Abu Hanifa when Salafis are notorious for slandering him. Also, there is no such thing as "Neo-Hanbali". He is what you call a traditional Hanbali and there are so many others like him in Greater Syria, Egypt and even Saudi Arabia who do not subscribe themselves with Salafiyya. I know it angers some Salafi brothers who believe they are the authorities of the Athari creed when in reality, they have nothing to do with the creed or the madhab in general He's not rewriting history. It's a known fact before the Salafi fitna movement, there were just Hanbalis and when Sheikh MIAW came. All the Hanbali ulama of his time including his father and older brother who were more knowledgeable than him made a fatwa declaring him as a deviant misguided khawarij. It's also very known that the creed of Ibn Taymiyyah (RA) was rejected by the vast majority of the Hanbalis of his time even admitted by his own student but you "Salafis" want to convince us your creed is unorthodox Islam, lol. May Allah guide you.
@@lumiam6982 You don't know what you are talking about. There is such thing as "Neo-Hanbalis", in the Arabic world they literally call themselves Al-Hanabilah Al-Judud, they literally have a network of students/shaykhs and a slogan they are proud of. Easy way to test if a claimant of the Hanbali madhab is true to their claim is to test them with the athar of mujahid. If they reject this athar because they think it is tashbeeh just like their brothers from the Jahmiyyah then they are frauds.
@Exposing Ahlul Bidah The pseudo-Salafis are a Ahlul Bid'ah. Yes, Jahmiyyah used to deny authentic narrations because it was "tashbih", but Ahlu Sunnah (Ash'aris, Maturidis and real Atharis) do not deny authentic narrations. They're the ones who transmitted them and defended the authenicity of these narrations way before your 300-year sect arrived, and you're reading them thanks to them, so be grateful to the preservers of the sunnah. They simply reject your baatil interpretation that you adopted from your ancestors, i.e. Hashwiyya and Karramiyya not the authentic narration itself, so please understand the difference.
@@lumiam6982 You are just waffling and I am not going to read your waffle. The simple litmus test is as follows. Ask any of these Neo-Hanbalis or "Real Atharis" as you like to call them. if they accept Athar Mujahid or not. If they reject it they are frauds and have gone against the way of Imam Ahmad and the ashaab. If you don't know this issue then please refrain from speaking about these topics until you educate yourself. Lastly, Asharis and Maturidis are ahlul bidah upon the way of Imam Aristotle and Plato. Have a nice day.
Both are right....in there own way mashallah ....
I really like his accent
I think it's from egypt
How can this man be called hanbali when he constantly goes against the hanabilia subhanAllah
He didn’t actually answer the question asked, examples of kalaam from ITs books. Refuting asharis isn’t what is meant by kalaam, IT didn’t build his aqeedah on kalaam.
BarakAllahu Fīk 🌹
Hey! That's not Dr. Shadee! 😂
Neo-Hanbalis are not Hanbalis
Allah Nabi Karim ke sadke wahabis salfi Isis ale Saudi nasrani yahudi fitne se musalmano ki hifazat kare aameen aameen aameen
Can you please define 'kalam' first. And does mantiq (logic) fall under kalam
Yeah like didnt abu hanifa do kalam?
Philosophy,
May this bro grow his beard as sahaba found acceptable. Not less than fist length was ever acceptable untill recent times, may Allah save us from this
That's hanafi madhab...I don't know about hanbali....
Point your blame at things that are haram not at things that are halal. Especially regarding the people who have sacrificed more for the deen than you have.
@@4SunniSchools lol
@@4SunniSchools what havent i sacrificed? born Muslims when they see a new muslim like me say how much more you know because you were born Muslim? May Allah guide you and me.
sahaba found acceptable? 🤣
Interesting.
You need to interview actual Hanbalis, not the neo Hanbalites. Try experts like Ahmed Al Gharib, Walid Al Meneesi, Dr. Karim Al Hilmy, Alaa Hasan Ismail...
This shaykh trashes 'salafis', yet his 1st Hanbali ijaza or any are from Sh. Walid Al Meneesi. He tries to rewrite the history of Hanbalis and Asharis...
I don't know why you call yourself Abu Hanifa when Salafis are notorious for slandering him. Also, there is no such thing as "Neo-Hanbali". He is what you call a traditional Hanbali and there are so many others like him in Greater Syria, Egypt and even Saudi Arabia who do not subscribe themselves with Salafiyya. I know it angers some Salafi brothers who believe they are the authorities of the Athari creed when in reality, they have nothing to do with the creed or the madhab in general He's not rewriting history. It's a known fact before the Salafi fitna movement, there were just Hanbalis and when Sheikh MIAW came. All the Hanbali ulama of his time including his father and older brother who were more knowledgeable than him made a fatwa declaring him as a deviant misguided khawarij. It's also very known that the creed of Ibn Taymiyyah (RA) was rejected by the vast majority of the Hanbalis of his time even admitted by his own student but you "Salafis" want to convince us your creed is unorthodox Islam, lol. May Allah guide you.
@@lumiam6982 You don't know what you are talking about. There is such thing as "Neo-Hanbalis", in the Arabic world they literally call themselves Al-Hanabilah Al-Judud, they literally have a network of students/shaykhs and a slogan they are proud of. Easy way to test if a claimant of the Hanbali madhab is true to their claim is to test them with the athar of mujahid. If they reject this athar because they think it is tashbeeh just like their brothers from the Jahmiyyah then they are frauds.
@Exposing Ahlul Bidah The pseudo-Salafis are a Ahlul Bid'ah. Yes, Jahmiyyah used to deny authentic narrations because it was "tashbih", but Ahlu Sunnah (Ash'aris, Maturidis and real Atharis) do not deny authentic narrations. They're the ones who transmitted them and defended the authenicity of these narrations way before your 300-year sect arrived, and you're reading them thanks to them, so be grateful to the preservers of the sunnah. They simply reject your baatil interpretation that you adopted from your ancestors, i.e. Hashwiyya and Karramiyya not the authentic narration itself, so please understand the difference.
@@lumiam6982 You are just waffling and I am not going to read your waffle. The simple litmus test is as follows.
Ask any of these Neo-Hanbalis or "Real Atharis" as you like to call them. if they accept Athar Mujahid or not. If they reject it they are frauds and have gone against the way of Imam Ahmad and the ashaab.
If you don't know this issue then please refrain from speaking about these topics until you educate yourself.
Lastly, Asharis and Maturidis are ahlul bidah upon the way of Imam Aristotle and Plato.
Have a nice day.
@@lumiam6982 you're simply mo3atil looking for fame