Subhan'ALLAH, really the shaykh Yusuf is like a lion in a sheephold. He is massacring the wahhabi madhab. May ALLAH protect him and preserve his teachings. آمين
very funny and ridiculous if a salafi claims that Imam Baiqilani is a salafi, the Islamic world from east to west from north to south and it is recorded in the history of Islamic aqidah that Imam Baiqilani is a follower of Asyariyah, they are claimer group
@@thehanbalischool2265 The Salafiyya like to use the following passage from al Gunya to justify their Aqeeda. It is proper to use the expression 'firmly established Himself ' in a quite straightforward, literal sense [itlaq], without subjecting it to forced interpretation [ta'wil]. It must also be clearly understood to mean the Self-establishment of the Divine Essence [istiwa' adh-Dhat] upon the Throne, not in the sense of bodily sitting down [qu'ud] and making physical contact [mumassa], as maintained by the [hereticalsects known as] the Mujassima and the Karramiyya, not in the abstract sense of exaltedness ['uluww] and elevated dignity [rif'a], as maintained by the Ash'ariyya, and not in the sense of control [istila'] and domination [ghalaba], as maintained by the Mu'tazila. These doctrines are unacceptable because they are not in accordance with the sacred law [shar'], and nothing to support them has been handed down to us on the authority of any of the Companions [sahaba] and Successors [tabi'un], the masters of tradition [ashab al-hadith] among our righteous predecessors [as-salaf as-salih]. On the contrary, all the evidence that has been transmitted from them supports the case for the straightforward, literal expression [itlaq].
@@thehanbalischool2265 Some people have said that the Ghunya of Ghaus e Azam Rahimullah has had fabrications into it, and the book cannot be reliably traced back to the honourable Shaykh
Assalamualaikum Shaykh You said previously in in Video Salafis/Wahabis are not from Ahle sunnah wal jamah. Is my prayer Valid behind Salafis/Wahabis. Can I pray my Salaf behind Imam E Harmanin in Mecca during Hajj
I don’t know about sheikh Yusuf’s opinion, but some great scholars said to pray behind them and then pray again after that. So don’t cause fitna and don’t leave the jamaah. But also be careful and stay safe with repraying it.
the Maturid’is/Asharis also acknowledge that but they don’t associate physically or place to Allah. Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and the Athari Ulema didn’t believe Allah was in a place or direction and outright rejected this false notion. Imam Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbali: Ahmed bin Hanbal was asked, the day before his death, about the quotes that speak about the attributes of Allah, and he said: We pass over them as they came to us and we believe in them if they came to us through a sound chain, and we do not describe Allah by what He did not describe Himself. He is without boundary and without body. And then he quoted the verse: There is nothing like Him." and said: Whoever talks about that (about limiting Allah) is an innovator."" (I'tiqadul Imami Abi Abdillah Ahmed ibn Hanbel, Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbeli, p.87.) Ibn al-Jawzī reported in his Daf` Shubah al-Tashbīh: `Alī ibn Muĥammad ibn `Umar al-Dabbas related to us that Rizq Allah ibn `Abd al-Wahāb al-Tamimi said: Aĥmad ibn Ĥanbal did not attribute a direction to the Creator. Source: Ibn al-Jawzī, Daf` Shubah al-Tashbīh, pp. 135
@@umair.saleemI’m from the UK but when I was in the Markaz of Shaikh Muqbil al-Waadi’ee in the Yemen there were many Indonesians. Also many of them were studying in KSA and Egypt. So big presence. Now the Shaafi’ee Madhab and the Ash’ari Aqeedah is returning strong there. That’s what spread Islaam there originally I think. In fact the way and who spread Islaam there needs studying and researching as it was amazing. But now a lot of the Salafis will start to turn towards the Hanbali way as is being witnessed in the UK Alhmdl. Some become Asharis too. Amazing times even though a lot of corruption has spread. I wasted 26 years with the Salafis. But after saying to myself MAYBE I’m wrong, I asked to Allah SWT to guide me along the way and researched carefully. Shocking what I discovered. One of the only ways to expose them on a mass level to enlighten the sincere ones amongst them is to not offer to debate them as they won’t accept that and will even warn from any Salafi that does accept to!! Best way is to mention the main issues about Ruboobiyyah and all the main issues after that with references then ASK THEM to reply by calling their heads out by their actual names. They won’t be able to answer at all if the references are given carefully. At the moment all they do is be extra harsh against the whole world lol😂teaching boycotting all as a way to stop their followers from possibly investigating. I have chats with some of their followers and all they say is DID YOI CHAT TO THE MAIN BROTHERS? 😂they have entrusted their Deen to them, how sad. So if you give them a thousand proofs it won’t work. It seems everybody else has and is continually developing and progressing except them. Sad. And they lock your thinking off. Pure Taqleed and Ta’assub and bigotry. They’re faces change if challenged to think on a few issues if proofs are shown they maybe wrong on key issues. It’s like they get alarm bells going off before they take it in lol😂 so sad. I was like that hardcore. We make Dua for them
I am moroccan myself , descendent of the berbers of the almorabiteen and they where salafi alhamdulilah they burned the books of al ghazali for a reason
@@mocro4life5713 make better research of this issue my brother, and yes al-Ghazaali has some issues in his Ih'yaa which they burnt, but then again most other ulamaa didn't do that. BUT the best way to learn Aqeedah, Fiqh and Tasawwuf in one go is through the Hanbali Madhab. Its complete plus a big point is that its about to spread to many countries and many cities, how??? Because the many Muslims of these times that are inclined to the Salafi way are moving away from it towards the Hanbali Way fully step by step. Unlike the other 3 Fiqh Madhabs that are limited to only some countries. The Tasawwuf of the Hanbali Madhab is very pure and strict with no Bid'ah or controversial issues. Check for example the books of ibnul Jawzi, ibn Qudamah al-Maqdisi who was an advisor to Salaah ud-Deen al-Ayoobi, and check ibn Taymiyyah explanation of Abdul-Qadir al-Jeelaanis book in his Maj'moo al-Fataawa, also how he corrected some Soofi Tareeqas and praised them and sometimes refuted some other Tareeqas Deviant ideas, and ibnul Qayyums Madaarij as-Saaliken explaining the Tasawwuf book of al-Harawi and the books of ibn Rajab and ibn Hazaamiyeen.In fact look how al-Ghazaali and then al-Jeelaani who got influenced by him a lot, look how they produced the Generation of Salaah ud-Deen. They rectified and raised a high quality generation of Ulamaa and leaders and Mujahideen that stuck by Salaah ud-Deen and if we don't have enough of that today then its useless having good leaders as they will be failed and not be supported.
What’s this Wahhabi aqeedah? It’s the same as the Athari aqeedah. And calling Imaam Al Baqillani رحمة الله عليه a “Salafi” doesn’t mean anything bad if you mean that he followed the Salaf us Saalih.
@@Ghiyassudin I believe Salafis affirm the Ma'na of the Sifaat but do Tafwid Kayfiyyah. I don't understand what's wrong with this as long as you don't compare Allaah subhaana wa ta'aala to the creation.
@@ibnMuharis. Giving literal meanings can lead to Tashbiyh, Athari scholars also acknowledged this. ʾImām ʾAbuw Yaʿlā (d. 458 AH) said: Its (i.e., the mutas͟hābih's) literal meaning implies tas͟hbiyh, and ʾAḥmad mentioned verses from the mutas͟hābih, and he spoke about them and explained them, according to the riwāyaẗ of ʿAbd Allāh from his father. ╾ Al-ʿUddaẗ, 2/693 ╼ 📚 ʾImām ibn Mufliḥ (d. 763 AH) said: Al-muḥkam is that which is clear in meaning and does not need any further elucidation, and al-mutas͟hābih is its opposite, due to an association or summation. The vast majority of our companions (the Ḥanābilaẗ) and those besides them, said that included therein are those which literally implicate tas͟hbiyh, like the Attributes of Allāh. ╾ ʾUṣuwl al-Fiqh, 1/316 ╼ 📚
@@ibnMuharis. taking by the apparent meaning can lead to Anthromorphism as you would then by falsely believing Allah has body parts like hands,feet,eyes etc. This is why it is better to do Tafwid Al Ma’na (leave the meaning to Allah) as the majority of the Salaf did and as the traditional Athar’is do.
@@ibnMuharis. Imam Abu Ya’la said: It’s (i.e the Mutashabihs) literal meaning that implies Tashbiyh, and Ahmad mentioned verses from the Mutashabih, and he spoke about them and explained them, according to the Riwayat of Abdullah from his Father”. -Al Uddat 2/693.
he's a direct student of Shaykhul Hanabil of Al Azhar don't talk stupid And these mixes have happened. There ware Shafi'i and Athari So, it's nothing new
La. He is a traditional hanbali scholar may Allah preserve him and his household, ameen. If you don't agree with him you should he on his level atleast, otherwise, you wouldn't even be heard
indeed, the salafis have made lots of false self-claim, including distorting many books written by great scholars in favor of salafis teaching n ideas.
![Speech commemorating the Wiladah of Imam Hasan al Askari [as]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1dyJe-Anslc/mqdefault.jpg)
🤣🤣shaykh made be laugh. 'they are thieeveees...they steal the aimmah'😂😂
Subhan'ALLAH, really the shaykh Yusuf is like a lion in a sheephold.
He is massacring the wahhabi madhab.
May ALLAH protect him and preserve his teachings.
آمين
very funny and ridiculous if a salafi claims that Imam Baiqilani is a salafi, the Islamic world from east to west from north to south and it is recorded in the history of Islamic aqidah that Imam Baiqilani is a follower of Asyariyah, they are claimer group
May Allah preserve you Shaykh
thank you, ya shaikh. I learned a lot from this video.
Sheikh, can you make a video on how to properly follow the Qadiri tariqah?
Sheikh could you please do a video on al Ghunya Talibeen and the statements of Al Arif Billah Imam Abdul qadir Jilani
The ghunya is a book, when you say statements, which statements are you referring to?
@@thehanbalischool2265
The Salafiyya like to use the following passage from al Gunya to justify their Aqeeda.
It is proper to use the expression 'firmly established Himself
' in a quite straightforward, literal sense [itlaq], without
subjecting it to forced interpretation [ta'wil]. It must also be
clearly understood to mean the Self-establishment of the
Divine Essence [istiwa' adh-Dhat] upon the Throne, not in
the sense of bodily sitting down [qu'ud] and making
physical contact [mumassa], as maintained by the [hereticalsects known as] the Mujassima and the Karramiyya, not in
the abstract sense of exaltedness ['uluww] and elevated
dignity [rif'a], as maintained by the Ash'ariyya, and not in
the sense of control [istila'] and domination [ghalaba], as
maintained by the Mu'tazila. These doctrines are
unacceptable because they are not in accordance with the
sacred law [shar'], and nothing to support them has been
handed down to us on the authority of any of the
Companions [sahaba] and Successors [tabi'un], the masters
of tradition [ashab al-hadith] among our righteous
predecessors [as-salaf as-salih]. On the contrary, all the
evidence that has been transmitted from them supports the
case for the straightforward, literal expression [itlaq].
@@thehanbalischool2265
Some people have said that the Ghunya of Ghaus e Azam Rahimullah has had fabrications into it, and the book cannot be reliably traced back to the honourable Shaykh
@@noorhassan4361 Abdul haq muhadis dehlwi said its not his book
Ibn e hajar said only aqeedah chapter is fabricated
@@sheesmustafa9522 where did ibn hajar say that brother
بارك الله فيك شيخ
Assalamualaikum Shaykh
You said previously in in Video Salafis/Wahabis are not from Ahle sunnah wal jamah.
Is my prayer Valid behind Salafis/Wahabis.
Can I pray my Salaf behind Imam E Harmanin in Mecca during Hajj
Why can't? May Allah bless you and me and allow us to go to hajj. Millions of people pray behind him
I thought these imams are hanbali?
I don’t know about sheikh Yusuf’s opinion, but some great scholars said to pray behind them and then pray again after that. So don’t cause fitna and don’t leave the jamaah. But also be careful and stay safe with repraying it.
Depends on your maddhab. But generally speaking it wouldn’t be permissible and if so prayers need to be made up
Your prayer will valid pray over qabr 😂😂 qaboori
shaykh reminds me of imama ahmed ibn hanmbal
In his dreams this jahmi is not to be compared to sheikh al islam imam ahmed
@@mocro4life5713 only a salafi thief would say that in his daydreams
He is not jahami he is hanbali , nor a Karrami like you😅@@mocro4life5713
Imam ahmad believed allah was above the throne
the Maturid’is/Asharis also acknowledge that but they don’t associate physically or place to Allah.
Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and the Athari Ulema didn’t believe Allah was in a place or direction and outright rejected this false notion.
Imam Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbali: Ahmed bin Hanbal was asked, the day before his death, about the quotes that speak about the attributes of Allah, and he said: We pass over them as they came to us and we believe in them if they came to us through a sound chain, and we do not describe Allah by what He did not describe Himself. He is without boundary and without body. And then he quoted the verse: There is nothing like Him." and said: Whoever talks about that (about limiting Allah) is an innovator.""
(I'tiqadul Imami Abi Abdillah Ahmed ibn Hanbel, Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbeli, p.87.)
Ibn al-Jawzī reported in his Daf` Shubah al-Tashbīh:
`Alī ibn Muĥammad ibn `Umar al-Dabbas related to us that Rizq Allah ibn `Abd al-Wahāb al-Tamimi said: Aĥmad ibn Ĥanbal did not attribute a direction to the Creator.
Source: Ibn al-Jawzī, Daf` Shubah al-Tashbīh, pp. 135
What do you think of Ibn taymiyya ?
Here in Indonesia Wahhabiyyah Najdiyyah claim that Al murabbithun is salafi killed by almuwahhidun in Africa.
What is it like in Indonesia in terms of najdiyyah followers, is it common or is it a minority
@@umair.saleemI’m from the UK but when I was in the Markaz of Shaikh Muqbil al-Waadi’ee in the Yemen there were many Indonesians. Also many of them were studying in KSA and Egypt. So big presence. Now the Shaafi’ee Madhab and the Ash’ari Aqeedah is returning strong there. That’s what spread Islaam there originally I think. In fact the way and who spread Islaam there needs studying and researching as it was amazing. But now a lot of the Salafis will start to turn towards the Hanbali way as is being witnessed in the UK Alhmdl. Some become Asharis too. Amazing times even though a lot of corruption has spread. I wasted 26 years with the Salafis. But after saying to myself MAYBE I’m wrong, I asked to Allah SWT to guide me along the way and researched carefully. Shocking what I discovered. One of the only ways to expose them on a mass level to enlighten the sincere ones amongst them is to not offer to debate them as they won’t accept that and will even warn from any Salafi that does accept to!! Best way is to mention the main issues about Ruboobiyyah and all the main issues after that with references then ASK THEM to reply by calling their heads out by their actual names. They won’t be able to answer at all if the references are given carefully. At the moment all they do is be extra harsh against the whole world lol😂teaching boycotting all as a way to stop their followers from possibly investigating. I have chats with some of their followers and all they say is DID YOI CHAT TO THE MAIN BROTHERS? 😂they have entrusted their Deen to them, how sad. So if you give them a thousand proofs it won’t work. It seems everybody else has and is continually developing and progressing except them. Sad. And they lock your thinking off. Pure Taqleed and Ta’assub and bigotry. They’re faces change if challenged to think on a few issues if proofs are shown they maybe wrong on key issues. It’s like they get alarm bells going off before they take it in lol😂 so sad. I was like that hardcore. We make Dua for them
I am moroccan myself , descendent of the berbers of the almorabiteen and they where salafi alhamdulilah they burned the books of al ghazali for a reason
@@mocro4life5713 make better research of this issue my brother, and yes al-Ghazaali has some issues in his Ih'yaa which they burnt, but then again most other ulamaa didn't do that. BUT the best way to learn Aqeedah, Fiqh and Tasawwuf in one go is through the Hanbali Madhab. Its complete plus a big point is that its about to spread to many countries and many cities, how??? Because the many Muslims of these times that are inclined to the Salafi way are moving away from it towards the Hanbali Way fully step by step. Unlike the other 3 Fiqh Madhabs that are limited to only some countries. The Tasawwuf of the Hanbali Madhab is very pure and strict with no Bid'ah or controversial issues. Check for example the books of ibnul Jawzi, ibn Qudamah al-Maqdisi who was an advisor to Salaah ud-Deen al-Ayoobi, and check ibn Taymiyyah explanation of Abdul-Qadir al-Jeelaanis book in his Maj'moo al-Fataawa, also how he corrected some Soofi Tareeqas and praised them and sometimes refuted some other Tareeqas Deviant ideas, and ibnul Qayyums Madaarij as-Saaliken explaining the Tasawwuf book of al-Harawi and the books of ibn Rajab and ibn Hazaamiyeen.In fact look how al-Ghazaali and then al-Jeelaani who got influenced by him a lot, look how they produced the Generation of Salaah ud-Deen. They rectified and raised a high quality generation of Ulamaa and leaders and Mujahideen that stuck by Salaah ud-Deen and if we don't have enough of that today then its useless having good leaders as they will be failed and not be supported.
What’s this Wahhabi aqeedah? It’s the same as the Athari aqeedah. And calling Imaam Al Baqillani رحمة الله عليه a “Salafi” doesn’t mean anything bad if you mean that he followed the Salaf us Saalih.
Athar’is do Tafwid Al Ma’na whereas Wahhabis are literalists.
They aren’t the same.
@@Ghiyassudin I believe Salafis affirm the Ma'na of the Sifaat but do Tafwid Kayfiyyah. I don't understand what's wrong with this as long as you don't compare Allaah subhaana wa ta'aala to the creation.
@@ibnMuharis. Giving literal meanings can lead to Tashbiyh, Athari scholars also acknowledged this.
ʾImām ʾAbuw Yaʿlā (d. 458 AH) said:
Its (i.e., the mutas͟hābih's) literal meaning implies tas͟hbiyh, and ʾAḥmad mentioned verses from the mutas͟hābih, and he spoke about them and explained them, according to the riwāyaẗ of ʿAbd Allāh from his father.
╾ Al-ʿUddaẗ, 2/693 ╼ 📚
ʾImām ibn Mufliḥ (d. 763 AH) said:
Al-muḥkam is that which is clear in meaning and does not need any further elucidation, and al-mutas͟hābih is its opposite, due to an association or summation. The vast majority of our companions (the Ḥanābilaẗ) and those besides them, said that included therein are those which literally implicate tas͟hbiyh, like the Attributes of Allāh.
╾ ʾUṣuwl al-Fiqh, 1/316 ╼ 📚
@@ibnMuharis. taking by the apparent meaning can lead to Anthromorphism as you would then by falsely believing Allah has body parts like hands,feet,eyes etc.
This is why it is better to do Tafwid Al Ma’na (leave the meaning to Allah) as the majority of the Salaf did and as the traditional Athar’is do.
@@ibnMuharis. Imam Abu Ya’la said:
It’s (i.e the Mutashabihs) literal meaning that implies Tashbiyh, and Ahmad mentioned verses from the Mutashabih, and he spoke about them and explained them, according to the Riwayat of Abdullah from his Father”.
-Al Uddat 2/693.
u cant be serious hahahah... hanbali and ashari? have you not read the history of the hanabila?
Shaykh Ul Islam Ibn al-Jawzi and Ibn Aql were Hanbali Ashar’is.
he's a direct student of Shaykhul Hanabil of Al Azhar
don't talk stupid
And these mixes have happened. There ware Shafi'i and Athari
So, it's nothing new
My love for Imam ibn Hanbal Rahimahullah is immense.
I respect you Sheikh but I don't agree with you
Don't listen to him,he's Asha'ari.
La. He is a traditional hanbali scholar may Allah preserve him and his household, ameen. If you don't agree with him you should he on his level atleast, otherwise, you wouldn't even be heard
@@leodadierodriguez3585 we salafis dont need to be on his level to disagree, we have ulama'.
indeed, the salafis have made lots of false self-claim, including distorting many books written by great scholars in favor of salafis teaching n ideas.
@@anandikanugraha we dc
There was no wahabiya back at his time. What u call wahhabiya here is the hanbaliya the true one. Not the one you are trying to spread ❤
🤣🤣🤣 you have Karramiyyah back then now they are Wahabiyah
@@galo_q al baqilani was a karramiy ?