Don't turn off the comments, please. More than a decade of my life in wahabbya with all flavors you can imagine in this sect. We need a big washing to clear our minds from that 'minhaj' and people, shuyukh must know there are former wahabis in the West living without shayrin faqih in a madhab and they need to keep contact with shouyoukh abroad speaking at least in English like they did with wahabi scholars in their past. Baraka Llahou fikoum.
Dear respected shaykh, please discuss the aqida of ibn Abdul Wahab, his claim that he took it from Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) and how it differs from athari aqida. Also please discuss the hanbali opinions on istigatha, tawassul and tabarruk.
@@gogetta3567 The traditional Hanbalis that free from Salafiyya practise the real Athari creed. The Salafis simply claim to follow the Athari creed when in reality they follow the Taymiyyan creed which were heavily influenced by Ibn Karram and Muqatil Ibn Sulayman the two known Mujassima and Mushabbiha. What's funny is Ibn Taymiyyah differed in creed with the Hanbali ulama of his time and Sheikh MIAW also differed in creed of the Hanbali ulama of his time which goes to show you that these two scholars were deviant in aqeeda and didn't follow the majority who followed the real Athari creed. Just like Salafis claiming to follow the Athari aqeeda it reminds us how they believe they're the only Ahlu Sunnah and the Hanafis, Malikis, Shafi'is and Hanbalis are not Ahlu Sunnah, lmao.
They also decieve people by the name of imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal. Imam Az Zahabi in biography of Ahmad ibn Hanbal in book „Siyar a'lamun-n-nubala“ says that book „Ar Radd 'ala jahmiyya“ is fabricated and supposititioned to Ahmad b. Hanbal. See 11th volume 286 p. What comes from Ahmad ibn hanbal is this: Says Ibn-Kudamah: „Says Abu-Bakr al-Halal: „We were informed by al-Marwazi and he said: „I asked Abu-Abdullah (Ahmed b. Hanbal) about the narrations about the attributes and he said: „We transmit them as they came.“ He says: I was informed by Ali b. Isa that Hanbal spoke to them and said: „I asked Abu-Abdullah (Ahmed b. Hanbal) about the hadiths in which it is stated that Allah made „nuzul“ every night on the earth's sky, that Allah sees, that He puts his „qadam“ and similarly, so Abu-Abdullah said: „We believe in them and confirm them, without quality and without meaning. We do not reject anything from them and we know that what came from the Messenger of Allah is the truth, if it is with the sound chain, and we do not reject the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, his word. Allah (swt) is not described more than what He described Himself with, or what His Messenger described Him with, without limit and without end. "Nothing is like Him, and He hears all and sees all.“““ (Ibn-Kudame, Zammu-t-ta'wil, p. 21., Ad-Daru-s-salafiyye, Kuwait, first edition, 1406. H.Y. ) Says Imam Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbali: „Ahmed was asked, the day before his death, about the quotes that speak about the attributes of Allah, and he said: „We pass over them as they came to us and we believe in them if they came to us through a sound chain, and we do not describe Allah by what He did not describe Himself. He is without boundary and without body. And then he quoted the verse: „There is nothing like Him.“ and said: „Whoever talks about that (about limiting Allah) is an innovator.““ (I’tiqadul Imami Abi Abdillah Ahmed ibn Hanbel, Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbeli, p. 87.) Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal said: „He who says that Allah is a body but is not like other bodies commits blasphemy“. (Narrated by: Abu Muhammad al-Baghdadi in his book Al Khisal and Badr al-Din al-Zarkashi in his book Tashnif Al 'Masami) Hafiz al-Bayhaqi quotes Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal in the work of Manaqib Ahmad: „A person commits an act of disbelief (kufr) if he says Allah is a body, even if he says: „Allah is a body but not like other bodies.““ (Hafiz al-Bayheki in Manaqib Ahmad) I think this is enough valid argumentation on what actually was aqeedah of Salaf.
@@amersekic8535 how misled you are when you’re literally quoting from the Tamimi Hanbalis affected by kalam who came 150 years after Imam Ahmad and never met him… All they say is “Imam Ahmad used to say” and Bayhaqi depends on them and his chain goes back to them and not even Imam Ahmad himself. Such Talbees is unsurprising from you lot. it’s unsurprising u didn’t bring actual quotes from his most notable students like al Khallal, Harb ibn Ismael al Kirmani, his sons Abdullāh and Saalih. Oh that’s right, because the ash’ariyyah call them anthropomorphists😂
If I understand well the hanbali position is to take the mutashabihat like real meanings, like homonym, but negate the physical bodily meanings? Wahabi don’t do that since they affirm the bodily meaning ..
I can see the pain of the Shaykh. May Allah ﷻ guide us towards right paths
I wish to see more videos on ibn abdulwahab najdi, such that it will clear the perspective of the students of ilm.
Don't turn off the comments, please. More than a decade of my life in wahabbya with all flavors you can imagine in this sect. We need a big washing to clear our minds from that 'minhaj' and people, shuyukh must know there are former wahabis in the West living without shayrin faqih in a madhab and they need to keep contact with shouyoukh abroad speaking at least in English like they did with wahabi scholars in their past. Baraka Llahou fikoum.
Dear respected shaykh, please discuss the aqida of ibn Abdul Wahab, his claim that he took it from Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) and how it differs from athari aqida. Also please discuss the hanbali opinions on istigatha, tawassul and tabarruk.
The shaykh has discussed tawassul in one of the videos of this playlists and istighatha was discussed in a video of his which you can find on RUclips.
Athari Ahalehadis salafi aqida is a one branch of umbrella
That has probably been covered in his courses, or will be covered in the upcoming course on As-Sawa'iq al-Ilahiyyah
@@mukhtarbinahamed7740
Athari aqeede and Wahabi/Salafi athari Aqeeda is different.
@@gogetta3567 The traditional Hanbalis that free from Salafiyya practise the real Athari creed. The Salafis simply claim to follow the Athari creed when in reality they follow the Taymiyyan creed which were heavily influenced by Ibn Karram and Muqatil Ibn Sulayman the two known Mujassima and Mushabbiha. What's funny is Ibn Taymiyyah differed in creed with the Hanbali ulama of his time and Sheikh MIAW also differed in creed of the Hanbali ulama of his time which goes to show you that these two scholars were deviant in aqeeda and didn't follow the majority who followed the real Athari creed.
Just like Salafis claiming to follow the Athari aqeeda it reminds us how they believe they're the only Ahlu Sunnah and the Hanafis, Malikis, Shafi'is and Hanbalis are not Ahlu Sunnah, lmao.
Great video Shaykh!
4:00 really shaykh he is commonly known as Qarnush shaitan in all over the world in all 4 schools.
Qarnushaytan is irak u idiot... stop lying on the cheikh... fear Allah...
Chawkani praised Qarnushaiytan ?
Even though he's an Arab, Shaykh Masha'Allah seems to have picked up a specific English accent, does he live/teach in England & where?
Some of his vowels sound Irish
He is Egyptian in Egypt
Did imam Ahmed did takfir on who said Allah is a body not like the body’s ?
They also decieve people by the name of imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal. Imam Az Zahabi in biography of Ahmad ibn Hanbal in book „Siyar a'lamun-n-nubala“ says that book „Ar Radd 'ala jahmiyya“ is fabricated and supposititioned to Ahmad b. Hanbal. See 11th volume 286 p.
What comes from Ahmad ibn hanbal is this: Says Ibn-Kudamah: „Says Abu-Bakr al-Halal: „We were informed by al-Marwazi and he said: „I asked Abu-Abdullah (Ahmed b. Hanbal) about the narrations about the attributes and he said: „We transmit them as they came.“ He says: I was informed by Ali b. Isa that Hanbal spoke to them and said: „I asked Abu-Abdullah (Ahmed b. Hanbal) about the hadiths in which it is stated that Allah made „nuzul“ every night on the earth's sky, that Allah sees, that He puts his „qadam“ and similarly, so Abu-Abdullah said: „We believe in them and confirm them, without quality and without meaning. We do not reject anything from them and we know that what came from the Messenger of Allah is the truth, if it is with the sound chain, and we do not reject the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, his word. Allah (swt) is not described more than what He described Himself with, or what His Messenger described Him with, without limit and without end. "Nothing is like Him, and He hears all and sees all.“““ (Ibn-Kudame, Zammu-t-ta'wil, p. 21., Ad-Daru-s-salafiyye, Kuwait, first edition, 1406. H.Y. )
Says Imam Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbali: „Ahmed was asked, the day before his death, about the quotes that speak about the attributes of Allah, and he said: „We pass over them as they came to us and we believe in them if they came to us through a sound chain, and we do not describe Allah by what He did not describe Himself. He is without boundary and without body. And then he quoted the verse: „There is nothing like Him.“ and said: „Whoever talks about that (about limiting Allah) is an innovator.““ (I’tiqadul Imami Abi Abdillah Ahmed ibn Hanbel, Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbeli, p. 87.)
Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal said: „He who says that Allah is a body but is not like other bodies commits blasphemy“. (Narrated by: Abu Muhammad al-Baghdadi in his book Al Khisal and Badr al-Din al-Zarkashi in his book Tashnif Al 'Masami)
Hafiz al-Bayhaqi quotes Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal in the work of Manaqib Ahmad: „A person commits an act of disbelief (kufr) if he says Allah is a body, even if he says: „Allah is a body but not like other bodies.““ (Hafiz al-Bayheki in Manaqib Ahmad)
I think this is enough valid argumentation on what actually was aqeedah of Salaf.
@@amersekic8535 how misled you are when you’re literally quoting from the Tamimi Hanbalis affected by kalam who came 150 years after Imam Ahmad and never met him… All they say is “Imam Ahmad used to say” and Bayhaqi depends on them and his chain goes back to them and not even Imam Ahmad himself. Such Talbees is unsurprising from you lot. it’s unsurprising u didn’t bring actual quotes from his most notable students like al Khallal, Harb ibn Ismael al Kirmani, his sons Abdullāh and Saalih. Oh that’s right, because the ash’ariyyah call them anthropomorphists😂
Allah Nabi Karim ke sadke wahabis salfi Isis ale Saudi nazdi yahudi nasrani fitne se suuni Muslim ki Jan mal ki hifazat kare aameen aameen
What madhab does Al-Azhar university subscribe to or what influences does one gain while studying at the university?
Whatever you want. Scholars from all four madhāib are present in al-azhar.
@@sharaheelhashmi1404 i thought 5?
@@theantracist what 5? There are only 4 living schools. Hanafiyyah, Shafiyyah, Malikiyyah, and Hanbaliyyah.
@@sharaheelhashmi1404 ja’afari
@@theantracist That's Shi'i. I'm discussing Ahl-Sunnah
Qarn
Horn of the Devil
Qarn Ash Shaytan
Dogs of hellfire
If I understand well the hanbali position is to take the mutashabihat like real meanings, like homonym, but negate the physical bodily meanings?
Wahabi don’t do that since they affirm the bodily meaning ..
i need hambli friends
Lets connect, please share any of your social media ID
Plotting against Imam Ahmad 😂
عجيب
Egyptian character just take the knowledge and keep it moving even when they are knowledgeable they have bad character
Hanbali = false aqeedah of God
why
wrong accusation