Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab & The Hanbali Madhab - The Hanbali Halaqah - Shaykh Yusuf bin Sadiq

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
  • Please follow us on our social media platforms for updates regarding classes, books and other announcements.
    linktr.ee/alma...

Комментарии • 49

  • @TOBI_FOX
    @TOBI_FOX 2 года назад +9

    Don't turn off the comments, please. More than a decade of my life in wahabbya with all flavors you can imagine in this sect. We need a big washing to clear our minds from that 'minhaj' and people, shuyukh must know there are former wahabis in the West living without shayrin faqih in a madhab and they need to keep contact with shouyoukh abroad speaking at least in English like they did with wahabi scholars in their past. Baraka Llahou fikoum.

  • @omarabdullahhanafi
    @omarabdullahhanafi 2 года назад +15

    I wish to see more videos on ibn abdulwahab najdi, such that it will clear the perspective of the students of ilm.

  • @MuMu124
    @MuMu124 Месяц назад +1

    So im an ex "salafi" so to say
    I ascibed to the salafi manhaj
    I quit it a couple of months ago and started listening to and reading the Hanbali madhab. And subhanallah its like learning the deen again but in such a liberating way alhamdulilah
    And finding out about MIWA's reality and how he was viewed by scholars during his very time. I find myself asking why do the salafis of today defend him so much and use him as the guage of who is upon haqq and who is upon baatil when the majority of the ummah is upon the correct aqeedah based on nummerious ahadeeth.
    Really makes no sense until you see it with a political lense as well as read the writings of the scholars and imams who were against him and his ways.
    May Allah save all who are upon this false salafi manhaj
    I have a very string feeling that ppl like me who leave modern day salafi movement feel as if the tightness in their chests is finally released.

  • @Nooneknowsme___4
    @Nooneknowsme___4 Год назад +1

    I can see the pain of the Shaykh. May Allah ﷻ guide us towards right paths

  • @fallenprince2146
    @fallenprince2146 2 года назад +14

    Dear respected shaykh, please discuss the aqida of ibn Abdul Wahab, his claim that he took it from Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) and how it differs from athari aqida. Also please discuss the hanbali opinions on istigatha, tawassul and tabarruk.

    • @ish8891
      @ish8891 2 года назад +7

      The shaykh has discussed tawassul in one of the videos of this playlists and istighatha was discussed in a video of his which you can find on RUclips.

    • @mukhtarbinahamed7740
      @mukhtarbinahamed7740 2 года назад

      Athari Ahalehadis salafi aqida is a one branch of umbrella

    • @user-hp2dr5qc8p
      @user-hp2dr5qc8p 2 года назад

      That has probably been covered in his courses, or will be covered in the upcoming course on As-Sawa'iq al-Ilahiyyah

    • @gogetta3567
      @gogetta3567 2 года назад +10

      @@mukhtarbinahamed7740
      Athari aqeede and Wahabi/Salafi athari Aqeeda is different.

    • @lumiam6982
      @lumiam6982 Год назад +3

      @@gogetta3567 The traditional Hanbalis that free from Salafiyya practise the real Athari creed. The Salafis simply claim to follow the Athari creed when in reality they follow the Taymiyyan creed which were heavily influenced by Ibn Karram and Muqatil Ibn Sulayman the two known Mujassima and Mushabbiha. What's funny is Ibn Taymiyyah differed in creed with the Hanbali ulama of his time and Sheikh MIAW also differed in creed of the Hanbali ulama of his time which goes to show you that these two scholars were deviant in aqeeda and didn't follow the majority who followed the real Athari creed.
      Just like Salafis claiming to follow the Athari aqeeda it reminds us how they believe they're the only Ahlu Sunnah and the Hanafis, Malikis, Shafi'is and Hanbalis are not Ahlu Sunnah, lmao.

  • @MOHAMMAD_5
    @MOHAMMAD_5 Год назад +4

    4:00 really shaykh he is commonly known as Qarnush shaitan in all over the world in all 4 schools.

    • @johnweak5439
      @johnweak5439 Год назад

      Qarnushaytan is irak u idiot... stop lying on the cheikh... fear Allah...

    • @johnweak5439
      @johnweak5439 Год назад

      Chawkani praised Qarnushaiytan ?

  • @isagoge
    @isagoge Год назад +1

    Great video Shaykh!

  • @JaleelBeig
    @JaleelBeig 2 года назад +4

    Even though he's an Arab, Shaykh Masha'Allah seems to have picked up a specific English accent, does he live/teach in England & where?

  • @altafdhakwala2183
    @altafdhakwala2183 9 месяцев назад +1

    Allah Nabi Karim ke sadke wahabis salfi Isis ale Saudi nazdi yahudi nasrani fitne se suuni Muslim ki Jan mal ki hifazat kare aameen aameen

  • @user-fn8ns8xn3k
    @user-fn8ns8xn3k 2 года назад +2

    If I understand well the hanbali position is to take the mutashabihat like real meanings, like homonym, but negate the physical bodily meanings?
    Wahabi don’t do that since they affirm the bodily meaning ..

  • @user-fn8ns8xn3k
    @user-fn8ns8xn3k 2 года назад +1

    Did imam Ahmed did takfir on who said Allah is a body not like the body’s ?

    • @amersekic8535
      @amersekic8535 Год назад +5

      They also decieve people by the name of imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal. Imam Az Zahabi in biography of Ahmad ibn Hanbal in book „Siyar a'lamun-n-nubala“ says that book „Ar Radd 'ala jahmiyya“ is fabricated and supposititioned to Ahmad b. Hanbal. See 11th volume 286 p.
      What comes from Ahmad ibn hanbal is this: Says Ibn-Kudamah: „Says Abu-Bakr al-Halal: „We were informed by al-Marwazi and he said: „I asked Abu-Abdullah (Ahmed b. Hanbal) about the narrations about the attributes and he said: „We transmit them as they came.“ He says: I was informed by Ali b. Isa that Hanbal spoke to them and said: „I asked Abu-Abdullah (Ahmed b. Hanbal) about the hadiths in which it is stated that Allah made „nuzul“ every night on the earth's sky, that Allah sees, that He puts his „qadam“ and similarly, so Abu-Abdullah said: „We believe in them and confirm them, without quality and without meaning. We do not reject anything from them and we know that what came from the Messenger of Allah is the truth, if it is with the sound chain, and we do not reject the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, his word. Allah (swt) is not described more than what He described Himself with, or what His Messenger described Him with, without limit and without end. "Nothing is like Him, and He hears all and sees all.“““ (Ibn-Kudame, Zammu-t-ta'wil, p. 21., Ad-Daru-s-salafiyye, Kuwait, first edition, 1406. H.Y. )
      Says Imam Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbali: „Ahmed was asked, the day before his death, about the quotes that speak about the attributes of Allah, and he said: „We pass over them as they came to us and we believe in them if they came to us through a sound chain, and we do not describe Allah by what He did not describe Himself. He is without boundary and without body. And then he quoted the verse: „There is nothing like Him.“ and said: „Whoever talks about that (about limiting Allah) is an innovator.““ (I’tiqadul Imami Abi Abdillah Ahmed ibn Hanbel, Abu Fadl At Tamimi Al Hanbeli, p. 87.)
      Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal said: „He who says that Allah is a body but is not like other bodies commits blasphemy“. (Narrated by: Abu Muhammad al-Baghdadi in his book Al Khisal and Badr al-Din al-Zarkashi in his book Tashnif Al 'Masami)
      Hafiz al-Bayhaqi quotes Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal in the work of Manaqib Ahmad: „A person commits an act of disbelief (kufr) if he says Allah is a body, even if he says: „Allah is a body but not like other bodies.““ (Hafiz al-Bayheki in Manaqib Ahmad)
      I think this is enough valid argumentation on what actually was aqeedah of Salaf.

    • @ProudSunniMuslim
      @ProudSunniMuslim Год назад

      @@amersekic8535 how misled you are when you’re literally quoting from the Tamimi Hanbalis affected by kalam who came 150 years after Imam Ahmad and never met him… All they say is “Imam Ahmad used to say” and Bayhaqi depends on them and his chain goes back to them and not even Imam Ahmad himself. Such Talbees is unsurprising from you lot. it’s unsurprising u didn’t bring actual quotes from his most notable students like al Khallal, Harb ibn Ismael al Kirmani, his sons Abdullāh and Saalih. Oh that’s right, because the ash’ariyyah call them anthropomorphists😂

  • @TheHanafiCat
    @TheHanafiCat 2 года назад +14

    Qarn

  • @ProLookout
    @ProLookout 2 года назад

    What madhab does Al-Azhar university subscribe to or what influences does one gain while studying at the university?

    • @sharaheelhashmi1404
      @sharaheelhashmi1404 2 года назад +6

      Whatever you want. Scholars from all four madhāib are present in al-azhar.

    • @theantracist
      @theantracist 2 года назад

      @@sharaheelhashmi1404 i thought 5?

    • @sharaheelhashmi1404
      @sharaheelhashmi1404 2 года назад +3

      @@theantracist what 5? There are only 4 living schools. Hanafiyyah, Shafiyyah, Malikiyyah, and Hanbaliyyah.

    • @theantracist
      @theantracist 2 года назад

      @@sharaheelhashmi1404 ja’afari

    • @sharaheelhashmi1404
      @sharaheelhashmi1404 2 года назад +4

      @@theantracist That's Shi'i. I'm discussing Ahl-Sunnah

  • @anamuslim627
    @anamuslim627 Год назад

    i need hambli friends

  • @abubakrDB
    @abubakrDB 2 года назад

    عجيب

  • @sulaimanabdullah4159
    @sulaimanabdullah4159 Год назад

    Egyptian character just take the knowledge and keep it moving even when they are knowledgeable they have bad character

  • @EternalVoice11
    @EternalVoice11 7 месяцев назад

    Hanbali = false aqeedah of God

  • @usefulvideoclips9275
    @usefulvideoclips9275 2 года назад

    wrong accusation