[4K] Rolex Sea-Dweller 43 vs Submariner 41 - SD43 vs SUB41; Beyond the obvious | Hafiz J Mehmood

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 183

  • @Newtypenewtype
    @Newtypenewtype 3 года назад +28

    Love that you're wearing the Sea Dweller, it's always good to see actual scratches on watches these days instead of pristine examples sitting in boxes for "investment" purposes...

  • @Mark..P
    @Mark..P 3 года назад +57

    The problem we have Hafiz, is that every watch you wear just looks really good and makes me want it. I am not sure if it’s your style, build, skin tone, photography, or all of the above, but I don’t think many of us can wear some of these pieces quite as well in reality 😁👏

    • @jamespalsson746
      @jamespalsson746 3 года назад +21

      Hafiz has the biggest small wrist in the world

    • @HafizJMehmood
      @HafizJMehmood  3 года назад +24

      Haha. Thanks fellows. I think it’s the perspective - third person view.
      We always see watches from first person perspective (wrist shot). Also, wrist shots taken from mobile camera m with terrible distortion often show watches to be flaring out of the wrist when in reality they’re not.
      Watches don’t look that big when you see from third person view, hence the reason I started showing this perspective in my vids :)

    • @weezkidtube
      @weezkidtube 3 года назад +2

      Mark P, you’re 100% on the ball. Hafiz needs to stop making these painfully good comparisons, now I find myself looking for the 40mm SD.

    • @stevesuard
      @stevesuard 3 года назад +1

      Feel the same, all watches looks great on his wrist because of skin colour tone, size proportion, hairy just as need in great places of the wrist and fore arm, muscular forearm... a model for watch advertising, adding pro videographer and a particular voice over to it and you ve got a great youtube channel

    • @tomlowe7731
      @tomlowe7731 3 года назад +3

      That’s because the watches are always sized properly and not loose on the wrist.

  • @user-wf2wi5wc2k
    @user-wf2wi5wc2k 3 года назад +13

    Just picked up a Seadweller after owning a Submariner previously. The size suits me perfectly and doesn't look big at all. I have an 18cm wrist. If anyone is worried about the SD being massive it isn't unless you have tiny wrists...

  • @simonassouline45
    @simonassouline45 3 года назад +8

    You Sir, are by Far the best and professional educator and narrator of Boutique Watches! Saw your Patek Philippe Aquanat Video, you pointed out all the flaws to the point of detail, on such an expensive entry point Watch! I’m a subscriber for life! Watch many other Videos, High expensive Boutique Watches, Like Audemares Piguet, Vacheron Constantin, Patek Philippe, Rolex, and etc.! Your explanation and references to the key subtle differences are amazing! Thanks, Sir!

  • @clarkgwozdecki6782
    @clarkgwozdecki6782 2 года назад +7

    Bigger bezel, bigger bezel teeth, bigger clasp, more gold, and bigger wrist presence are the reason I picked the TT seadweller over Blusy. No comparison when you hold them side by side. It is a beast

  • @Nexus.Achiles
    @Nexus.Achiles 3 года назад +32

    This is like comparing a standard Porsche 911 with a 911 GTS. Some people will be happy with the basic model and feel there's no need for more. Others will want something extra, push the enveloppe a bit further. No right or wrong, just a question of finding what one likes and is happy with.

    • @EscapePlan97
      @EscapePlan97 Год назад

      Hi. Good comparison. However, you forgot to mention that there are situations you’d deliberately choose a „standard“ 911 over the GTS.

    • @pushatsinfrared
      @pushatsinfrared Год назад +2

      @@EscapePlan97daily driving. A base 911 is more liveable than even an S in most cases due to having a softer ride and less harsh road noise

    • @jakesantora8843
      @jakesantora8843 8 месяцев назад +2

      Your comment is spot on. It’s a perfect analogy.

  • @ngtilui
    @ngtilui 2 года назад +5

    The only thing that's stopping me from sd is the lack of the glossy black dial.

  • @dirkdiggler7990
    @dirkdiggler7990 3 года назад +6

    Just bought my 43m Sea Dweller from my AD and it fits perfect on my 8in wrist👍

  • @ticktology
    @ticktology 2 года назад +5

    SD43 for me. Although iconic & just about perfect, the Sub is way too common & overdone. Love the heft, the red text, & complete bezel markings on the SD43.

  • @veilofmayaa
    @veilofmayaa 3 года назад +1

    I watched this video a month and a half ago. I probably rewound the first bit like a zillion times I mean the SD sits so well on your wrist. The pelagos LHD and the SD have been my grail watches. By some divine grace I got both in the last couple of weeks. I love the SD and this video got me borderline obsessed with it. Very informative, perfect camera angles and of course a very soothing voice to go with it. Doesn't get better!!

  • @sprocketdog6303
    @sprocketdog6303 3 года назад +4

    Are you a professional film maker? Seriously the best produced watch videos on here.

  • @regisbarou4922
    @regisbarou4922 2 года назад +1

    Hafiz's videos are famous for offering the best pictures that can be seen on Utube.
    But please don't forget the text which is also perfect, always sharp and balanced.
    The point of view given on every watch is always so clever and interesting.
    Pictures and text make Hafi's vidéos a unic contribution.

  • @scotthowie476
    @scotthowie476 3 года назад +4

    SD 43 with the red text is just outstanding and I like the writing on the back of the case also the bezel is more practical and these are more rarer than subs definitely a collection piece that anniversary one

  • @Wristshot
    @Wristshot 3 года назад +18

    This first 2 minutes of narrative used was just amazing! Well done for expressing your thoughts so articulately! 👍👍👍👍 from London!

  • @rootedrotor525
    @rootedrotor525 3 года назад +3

    I've got the SD43 and love it, but I must say that the sub gives me pause. I think I prefer that gloss black dial and its smaller proportions. But the SD43 has a lot of wrist prescence.

  • @davidofglenbrook4487
    @davidofglenbrook4487 3 года назад +9

    I prefer the SD43. [A really spectacular video and narrative, BTW. But then again, we’ve all come to expect that from you....]

  • @jamier5639
    @jamier5639 Год назад +1

    If the sub wore closer to a true 41mm, it would wear perfectly on my 7.75inch wrist. Dimensions can be deceiving and are everything in how a watch wears. Interestingly enough, the Tudor black bay S&G wears perfectly on my wrist and had me thinking I could pull off the sub 41, until I tried one on. The Tudor has a 41mm bezel with basically a sd43 case and 22mm bracelet. Dial size also makes a difference. Talk about a visual mindfuck...lol. so for me, I will be going with the sd43, explorer II 42mm and Tudor 41mm to enjoy the various bezel sizes. Hafiz I would love to see a comparison between the Tudor S&G (or Tudor with saame dimensions) and the Sub 41.

  • @Badlighter
    @Badlighter 8 месяцев назад

    Just found your channel. Brilliant. I love your relaxed view on the use of the definite article “the”. Stay well. Amazing watch descriptions. It’s like you are the Cervantes of horological reviews.

  • @SavedbybGrace
    @SavedbybGrace 3 месяца назад +1

    Absolutely top shelf production. Just bought the SD 43. Even nicer than the Batgirl I owned previously.

  • @cassin11
    @cassin11 2 года назад +1

    One of the best reviews I've seen of Rolex with detailed measurements and wrist shots.

  • @shoikajohnson3892
    @shoikajohnson3892 3 года назад +6

    Best watch videos on RUclips. Love the comparisons. Love the fact that you give real measurements including thickness. Love being able to see how the watch looks on a person, rather than just someone’s wrist. Great voice. Great dialogue. Keep it up Hafiz!

  • @JFK-1984
    @JFK-1984 3 года назад +11

    Happy with mine SD43. Great content Hafiz

  • @djones1304
    @djones1304 3 года назад +1

    Having the minute markers on the bezel on the SD43 makes it look small than it is. Which is clever design.

  • @scottwexlin6456
    @scottwexlin6456 3 года назад +4

    Hoping for the call from my AD for the SD 43 soon.

  • @divjan3990
    @divjan3990 3 года назад +2

    Thank you for this one !
    What type of camera you are using for making videos ?

  • @davidsilos7241
    @davidsilos7241 3 года назад +3

    Just got my SD-43 today! Just amazing

  • @wills2552
    @wills2552 2 года назад +2

    Another great review, I recently bought a SD43 126603 on the strength of your review and I'm not disappointed.

  • @macrolex9485
    @macrolex9485 3 года назад +4

    Photography 10/10 and the most detailed commentary on RUclips - there are some differences on these two models that I wasn’t even aware of until you pointed them out - despite watching countless reviews by others. I was offered the steel SD43 last year from an AD which I politely refused saying I preferred the ‘inky black’ gloss dial of the Sub to the Matt grey of the SD - even the experienced AD manager wasn’t aware of the difference🙄 Your top quality content is appreciated - keep up the good work👍🤓

    • @macrolex9485
      @macrolex9485 3 года назад

      p.s. for months I wondered if I’d missed a rare opportunity in declining the SD43 then out of the blue received a call from a different AD that I’d left my details with years ago offering me the new ‘no date’ Sub 2 weeks after release - I couldn’t believe it as I’d no purchase history but jumped at the chance!🤩

  • @Adrian-zb2lu
    @Adrian-zb2lu Год назад +3

    So similar watches, but the icon is the submariner.

  • @villetaone
    @villetaone 3 года назад +2

    Very good video as usual. Great to see the comparison I was looking for. I think the SD43 it’s the winner, but as I always advice people, only buy the watch you like no matter what people think or tell you about it, the one that will wear the watch is you and is for you to like it.

  • @Gio-en5kv
    @Gio-en5kv 3 года назад +3

    i d love to see a 42 mm sub (real 42 not like the 40.5 2020 we call 41mm), with a 600m wr with a thickness somewhere in between the sub and the SD, like a SD but with a flatter back case.

    • @jamier5639
      @jamier5639 Год назад

      42 would be perfect. The middle ground between the two other sizes that would be more versatile.

  • @jh-il5sb
    @jh-il5sb 3 года назад +1

    i now have the discontinued sub no date, 114060, but really like the bigger SD 43. I have a 7.25 wrist and the sub feels small. I wonder whether these watches are too close in their styling and could exist in the same collection

  • @marktime61
    @marktime61 3 года назад +2

    Great video, shame it had about 6 advert breaks :-(

  • @frankv7068
    @frankv7068 2 года назад +1

    I like the transition between the lugs and bracelet on the Sea Dweller, the Submariner improved this but not as seamless as the 43 model.

  • @Portland_Living_Life
    @Portland_Living_Life 3 года назад +4

    Hafiz, I am glad that I can always count on you to put together great comparison videos like this! I've got the 41mm Sub and older 16600 Sea Dweller. I've literally "downsized" my collection recently from bigger, manlier pieces. I have been yearning for something with more wrist presence and was thinking about the SD 43. Really great comparison and exactly what I needed. I've got a 44mm Panerai coming first and I'll see how I feel about that. Maybe the SD 43 is next.

  • @steely95
    @steely95 2 года назад

    Merci beaucoup pour votre vidéo.
    J’hésitais avec la submariner mais quand je suis passé en boutique la submariner faisait quincaille à côté de la SD.
    Sur mon poignet ( 19,5cm -20cm ) la SD avait beaucoup plus de présence et la ligne rouge fait toute la différence.
    Merci Hafiz.

  • @MattSteemson
    @MattSteemson 3 года назад +1

    Why do people say the Submariner has always been 40mm? The original Submariner 6204 in 1953 measured 37-38mm.

  • @ultrabeing1
    @ultrabeing1 3 года назад +11

    Now this is the video I've been waiting for!

  • @npaul4171
    @npaul4171 3 года назад +2

    Great video! I've been trying to find either of these (41 or 43) in black and have been torn on which as my wrist size is borderline at about 6.25 inches. It would be my first and only Rolex, and the watch I would wear every day. I am leaning towards the 41, although as both are so hard to find right now at an AD, I'd likely be inclined to purchase either if my dealer offers me one.
    With something like a Bergeon spring bar tool, is either one harder/easier to change the band on? I would likely get a few custom straps, perhaps something like a custom shark strap, a rubber one, and classic leather, so I would like to be able to swap bands pretty frequently.

  • @stefanivan7930
    @stefanivan7930 Год назад +1

    I love that you got them synchronized.... Getting the Sea-dweller next week! 😁 My first and probably only ever Rolex!

  • @davidclutterbuck7076
    @davidclutterbuck7076 3 года назад +1

    Hello Hafiz,
    I love you detailing, and also as I have an SD43 (MK1) it's great to see it in such magnified detail

  • @jolicska
    @jolicska Год назад

    you make the best qualitiy in speaking of camera work for watches review, your hands are incredibly stable holding those watches. i belive the submariner date 41mm is way more elegant,proportioned and clean looking than the sea dweller.

  • @falcon81701
    @falcon81701 8 месяцев назад

    I bought the 41mm sub thinking it would have been the perfect fit for my 6.5” wrist but i think I could have gone the Sea-dweller as well.

  • @gibshall2007
    @gibshall2007 Год назад +1

    Just the comparison I was searching for. Thanks!

  • @machomadness9424
    @machomadness9424 3 года назад +3

    I wore my 2017 sub date with pride until I stood next in line to a guy wearing a SD. It made me feel inferior. Sold the sub not for this reason and now have the SD43. Guess what? I miss my sub! Such is life my friends, be grateful and enjoy the journey.

  • @crkvend
    @crkvend 3 года назад +1

    The production value of your videos is simply beyond anything else on this hobby. These videos are almost therapeutic :)
    Oh, and while I’m here, taking another chance to beg for a Aqua Terra macro treatment ;)

  • @22jeepmojave75
    @22jeepmojave75 5 месяцев назад +1

    Sea dweller is better because too many people have sub. I owned both and I moved on to deep sea 136660-003.

  • @scottlalonde2878
    @scottlalonde2878 3 года назад +1

    Another awesome video, thank you, Hafiz. Have not tried either one on, but just going by looks, I'd prefer the 41mm. Your film of posing with them reminds me I have to go on a diet, thanks allot! 😁

  • @DWilliam1
    @DWilliam1 3 года назад

    Thorough review. One of the better watch reviewers on RUclips. Looking forward to your next...

  • @champeight6737
    @champeight6737 3 года назад +4

    Conclusion is that the sd43 is far more superior.

  • @KondemNedSkilLz
    @KondemNedSkilLz 3 года назад +4

    Absolutely love your videos, keep them coming!

  • @npet6842
    @npet6842 3 года назад

    Thanks for all the measurements and the dial coating / colour detail :-)

  • @miketan3398
    @miketan3398 3 года назад +1

    Excellent comparison, you hit all the important points.

  • @robboyer6448
    @robboyer6448 3 года назад +3

    While i like the concept of the helium escape valve, the 41mm sub, objectively speaking, is, to me, the better watch. Great video!!

  • @murmanzach4109
    @murmanzach4109 3 года назад +2

    SD43 are the best looking Diverwatch 🔥🔥

  • @michaelbishop9157
    @michaelbishop9157 3 года назад +5

    SD43 - just a better watch all round with more wrist presence

    • @19NJS71
      @19NJS71 3 года назад

      I am thinking of moving from the SD43 that I own to the new Sub (green if possible). The case back sticks out so much on the SD, so the watch doesn't sit flat on the wrist.

    • @michaelbishop9157
      @michaelbishop9157 3 года назад

      @@19NJS71 maybe your wrist shape ?

    • @19NJS71
      @19NJS71 3 года назад

      @@michaelbishop9157 try to find a side picture.. you will see what I mean. the case back sticks out at least 3 mm. it is a clever design, because the watch looks slimmer than it really is

  • @Maarten_official_account
    @Maarten_official_account 3 года назад +1

    Excellent comparison and amazing videography as always!

  • @massimilianorodi9877
    @massimilianorodi9877 3 года назад +2

    I have Sea-Dweller Red Write ! Amazing !
    Very good video ! Hello frome Italy ( Rome ) 👋

  • @MestizoJez
    @MestizoJez Год назад

    Quick question. Could someone confirm if the SD43 would need extra links for a 24cm wrist. Thanks in advance

  • @UniqueCarsChannel
    @UniqueCarsChannel 2 года назад

    What’s your photography set up?

  • @ivanl1370
    @ivanl1370 7 месяцев назад

    Just got my SD43. Perfect watch. Have GMTII too. Which is siize/weight comparable to Sub. Prefer SD43. Much better quality. Weight difference is just about 30 gr. Made very robust. Very underestimated watch. Advise to all who like to get robust Rolex for daily activities. From my point of view SD43 looks more interesting than the sub. Red letters, bezel looks amaizing. Have 6.5" flat wirst. Looks perfect.

  • @johnnyv673
    @johnnyv673 3 года назад +3

    I prefer the SUB over the SD43 mainly because the bezel insert on the SD43 looks too big for me.

    • @scottlalonde2878
      @scottlalonde2878 3 года назад

      Agree. And the cyclops looks too close to center for me.

  • @erhardwoodsflooring4662
    @erhardwoodsflooring4662 Год назад

    I have a 2022 sea dweller 50 anniversary I love it so much . Only a weekend water for me .
    I use my op datejust 41 everyday.

  • @MervTeo
    @MervTeo 3 года назад

    Been waiting for this video Hafiz! Thank you for making it. Not only are you king of the macro shot, just realized we've all overlooked your great script writing skills! Narrative here is awesome 😎. And the voice...kudos mate!

  • @eduardovillalon7496
    @eduardovillalon7496 Год назад +4

    Coming from the SD 43mm. Bought it and sold after 1 month of owning, and just got the New 41mm Sub. Have a 7.5” wrist, so size was never a problem with me. I realized that as much as I loved the red letters and the tone of black on the SD, it’s main problem for me was that the “43mm” size, is far from a good implementation: The dial size is practially the same as the Sub, only with a bigger bezel. This was a big mistake from Rolex, since the SD has to show the same information inside and a bit more, making it look stuffed, crowded and at the same time disproportionately on. Why not make the dial and bezel bigger in a symmetrical way from the beginning? They could have respected the 43mm all in all proportions, and still keep room for the next 1mm needed to differentiate it from the upper Deep Sea. Yes, I love the look that mate black in the back gives to it, but in terms of design an proportions, definitely the Sub 41mm has the edge. Hope Rolex can fix this issues and help the SD43 to look better.

    • @impexRQ
      @impexRQ Год назад

      So you have ladys wrist and realized after bought the SD43? Lol

    • @T.Q.
      @T.Q. Год назад

      @@impexRQIf your woman has a 7.5 inch wrist, she’s either obese or a man

    • @SB-Kiwi
      @SB-Kiwi 5 месяцев назад

      Thru display the same amount of information. 🤷🏽‍♂️

    • @maradona8623
      @maradona8623 Месяц назад

      SD43 is king!

  • @Ally007
    @Ally007 3 года назад +2

    Brilliant review my friend all the best from 🇬🇧

  • @murda2999
    @murda2999 3 года назад +1

    Very helpful and nicely photographed.

  • @thewatchslinger968
    @thewatchslinger968 3 года назад

    Put adverts at beginning or end please

  • @tyngshen28
    @tyngshen28 3 года назад +1

    7:03 are those scratches on the lugs where they meet the spring bar?

  • @TwentyOne_Five
    @TwentyOne_Five 2 года назад +1

    6:31. That’s not close to being the only measurement that matters.

  • @Randyolsson
    @Randyolsson 3 года назад

    What are you saying around 3:20 about the hour hand being wider etc? What is suppose to be non-existant?

  • @TraumaTeamRacing
    @TraumaTeamRacing 2 года назад

    Amazingly shot! Awesome video🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🔥

  • @mattsimmons146
    @mattsimmons146 3 года назад +1

    Been looking for something like this with these two watches! Thank you!

  • @Sledgehammerengineer
    @Sledgehammerengineer 3 года назад +2

    Another great review, thanks! Great watches, love them all but I still prefer my Deepseas 😁.

  • @Ballsyone
    @Ballsyone 3 года назад

    Look at the wasted space given to the bezel and the angled haute on the Sea Dweller. That extra real estate should be distributed on the dial like on the 41mm sub.

  • @bmwe36m3evo
    @bmwe36m3evo 8 месяцев назад

    You have worn your Sea-Dweller a lot! And you have changed the bracelet a LOT! Love it! 😍
    I own one, and I think it makes the Submariner look like the little annoying brother... 🤭

  • @air23forever35
    @air23forever35 3 года назад

    Can I pull that off? I have a 6.75 inch wrist only. I have a 40-42 watches never tried the 43mm. Opinions are very much appreciated. Thanks guys

    • @TheGreatWesternTrendkill
      @TheGreatWesternTrendkill 3 года назад

      it's pushing it IMO. it may look a little funny in comparison but it's a close call @ almost 7 inches

  • @larceny3092
    @larceny3092 Год назад

    What site you buy from

  • @justicejustice1299
    @justicejustice1299 Месяц назад

    Both looks good on your wrist!

  • @TheMystro1971
    @TheMystro1971 3 года назад +4

    The Sub41 has really killed the SD43. I have owned the SD43 and it’s case back protrudes out to the point making it very uncomfortable on the wrist. This is not the case with the DSSD. That said the dimensions and attention to detail is now perfection on the Sub41. It really rendered a death blow to what momentum the SD43 had left. The SD43 is bulky and not balance like the Sub41. The Submariner is THE icon and just looks better. If you need a technical dive watch you get the DSSD.

    • @scotthowie476
      @scotthowie476 3 года назад +10

      I disagree the sea dweller is a better submariner In every sense and the sub looks small on most guys wrists

    • @Val_Cosmos
      @Val_Cosmos 3 года назад +1

      I just sold my SDDS D-blue. Its way too top heavy and bulky. Now I'm in search for SD 43. Also its not easy to read the smallish date on sdds at a quick glance. I like cyclops as a instantly recognizable Rolex feature plus readability.

    • @Magnus-pm7ic
      @Magnus-pm7ic 2 года назад +6

      @japanwatchconnection There is no one size fits all. I am avid lifter and when I tried the sub on, it looked like a toy. So to each their own.

    • @Bandionaire
      @Bandionaire Год назад

      @@Magnus-pm7ic i agree.. I’m not even a huge guy but the sub wears small in my opinion. Looking forward to purchasing the SD43

  • @SoCalWatchReviews
    @SoCalWatchReviews 3 года назад +1

    Incredible work man. New sub!

  • @lrahmn7560
    @lrahmn7560 3 года назад

    Bro. Please do a review of the Sea Dweller 116600 40mm version.

  • @Mike-hr7pc
    @Mike-hr7pc 3 года назад +1

    Very informative ! WoW ! I just love your video !

  • @kamimcmmm
    @kamimcmmm 7 месяцев назад

    I have the 2017 MK1 of the SD43 and fits me better than the sub, won’t go back :)

  • @happyspirit0717
    @happyspirit0717 3 года назад

    Great vid and comparison! Thank you!

  • @joelo3346
    @joelo3346 3 года назад

    The best watch reviews on YT, period. Kudos to you sir.

  • @zaa5010
    @zaa5010 11 дней назад

    It is good video. I like this.
    I got 126600 a few year ago. But I watched your other video 116710LN.
    It is so attractive !
    Should I trade 126600 to 116710LN?

  • @joecarlson5418
    @joecarlson5418 2 года назад

    Great vid and exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!

  • @alihussain5272
    @alihussain5272 3 года назад +2

    Another amazing video. Greetings from London

  • @pauls2973
    @pauls2973 3 года назад

    great analysis Hafiz, look forward to your next

  • @bobotmeister
    @bobotmeister 8 месяцев назад

    imo, the sea dweller is the better watch... with gray market prices only a little above SRP. going for the date sub, prepare for the hype pricing 😆 If you really want a rolex for the brand, get watches that are overlooked. If you're just going for it because it's the "in" thing... 🤷‍♂

  • @sidmini
    @sidmini 3 года назад +1

    Hafiz I’m more intrigued what you are checking out on tour ipad? More Rolex purchases? Haha

    • @HafizJMehmood
      @HafizJMehmood  3 года назад +1

      Haha. On iPad I’m watching the clip (myself) as it records to see how it’s looking for video. It’s a bit tricky when you’re the camera man and you’re also the model 😅

  • @marty8697
    @marty8697 3 года назад +2

    Great video great content thanks for sharing

  • @backatbragg
    @backatbragg Год назад

    Well done video! Thanks for sharing

  • @paulhowell6899
    @paulhowell6899 3 года назад +2

    Without a doubt, the best comparison I've seen on these two watches, I'm in the market and you've opened my eyes to some of the finer points. Thank you, Hafiz.

  • @Treetopflyer777
    @Treetopflyer777 3 года назад +1

    I’m hoping my AD will call me for a SD43. 🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻

  • @amerikanstafford
    @amerikanstafford Год назад +1

    Good explanation.
    I have the same Rolex in a combination of black and gold.I don't know the exact year at the moment, but I think it's 2007 or 2017.Because it doesn't have a cyclops eye above the date display uninitiated amateurs think it is a Rolex fake but I don't have all the certificates and it is original .These watches are very rare and increasingly valuable especially for collectors.The watch works as it should without a problem.

  • @50337andy
    @50337andy 3 года назад

    Brilliant presentation.
    As always 👏👍

  • @andrewbrown5636
    @andrewbrown5636 3 года назад +2

    Got both..prefer the sub 41 with it’s better legibility and ergonomics

  • @davidpratt1011
    @davidpratt1011 2 года назад

    Amazing review, thank you!