I'm a former inspector for SpaceX. As much as I love the Dragon, I love buttons you can push and actual flight controls. I'm on the boomer/gen x line so buttons make more sense to me. I love how the Starliner actually looks like it has a cockpit. That being said, Dragon is Star Trek whereas Starliner is Star Wars. I think Dragon is going in the right direction. Congrats to Boeing.
I'm a little older and I like the tactile response of a switch or button vs a numb touchscreen, I equate it to today's cars vs the cars we drove 30 years ago. But the new generation of spacers have grown up with touch technology and trust in automation and Dragon and future spacecraft are for the young astronauts of today and tomorrow.
@@Columbus1152 if automation fails in space you're fucked even with buttons, same with a helicopter, it's not like a manual automobile or prop airplane... but i see how one can "feel" it to be more like a black box without buttons
I freely admit to being a die hard SpaceX fan. Yes, Starliner looks antiquated compared to Crew Dragon, but I am thrilled for Starliner, Boeing, and everyone involved with this tremendous accomplishment.
Sounds like you're an actual fan of space travel/exploration...not just a fanboy. What use in mentioning who you like? The end goal is the same, correct?
Great socks, Suni. I was looking at her bio and that woman can literally fly anything with rotors. Turn your lawnmower upside down and she'd make it fly.
great to see the contrast in design philosophy's between Boeing and SpaceX with respect to Astronaut UI. Starliner seems more traditional and "old school" vs Dragon
I don't know. Probably because you're not a test pilot / astronaut. You think about what matters in these situations. Having a Cuisinart doesn't really matter much.
Have you ever played Reentry? It is a simulator for Mercury, Gemini and Apollo spacecraft. Try that and you will see, why it definitely does not look like apollo. Apollo had phyiscal switches everywhere all around. Every single function was controlled by physical switches. Even the control of the audio recording tape. The only thing remotely similar to a tablet was the 10-Digit input for the AGC, the DSKY - which btw has huge buttons. I wonder why....
I wonder how spacious and comfortable the capsule is when Boeing finally need to send 4 astronauts in ISS. When now it looks so messy and very tight Inside the capsule. However congratulations for the two astronauts finally made it into ISS safe and sound. Now the next step is return back to earth hopefully nothing bad happen to the capsule.
Aircrafts used to have black dashboards back in 1960.. Then someone realized that there are colors that will make your working environment more pleasant 😁
I think its due to one having real controls and one being expected to be flown by wire and preplanned mission guidance. I dont think dragon can be "flown"
@@asgaria8736Let's be honest with each other at this point. If space flight doesn't go EXACTLY as planned, it gets aborted like an unplanned high school pregnancy to a high class family. Saying all of that, fly by wire with limited human intervention seems to make a lot more sense.
@@oldfredbear "If space flight doesn't go EXACTLY as planned, it gets aborted like an unplanned high school pregnancy to a high class family. " Absolute bullshit. You have a narrow window before launch to "abort", but after that space flight is HUGELY dependent upon human interaction. Apollo 13? Gemini 8? Get a clue.
Honestly looks mean jack shit. Capability is everything. This Spacecraft has some issues with helium leaks (this can force an immediate abort since helium is needed to pressurize the RCS tanks) but I am sure they will get it sorted out.
Suni - LOVE the socks! Thanks to you and Butch for the great tour of the vehicle.
18 дней назад+49
Looks like a scaled up copy of Alan Shepard's Mercury capsule... How can Dragon look so streamlined and spacious while this thing looks like build in the 60's...
@@Egill2011 And the cooling system used more water than planned. And the thrusters failed. They had done work on the thrusters for 2 whole years before this flight because they didn't work during the last test either, and they were still crap. Starliner couldn't even dock on time because of all the issues. Starliner is a lemon that puts the lives of astronauts at greater risk than necessary.
I am a bit split in half in my opinion: while the Dragon Capsule certainly looks more sleek, near, futuristic - I think you are screwed when the screen fails. In Starliner, everything looks like in the 60ies, brought forward to an 80ies design, with some screens added (like in an airliner). As a pilot (or commander) I am not sure, if I would not still prefer real buttons and handles and knobs to steer the spacecraft rather than just wiping on a touch screen (?). But maybe you could still have made the cockpit look a bit more like a Tesla rather than a Soyus! 😂
Screen failures are exceedingly rare, like beyond rare, and there are redundant screens for redundant screens. If you were in some type of situation where some external force caused every screen to go out, it doesn’t matter what spacecraft you’re in and whether it’s controlled manually or automatically by screens, you’re probably no longer living. If only the screen failed, the craft would still be piloting itself. It’s really a non issue.
It can be entirely controlled remotely, and the screens can be reconfigured how/whenever they want. I believe their tablets can take over as well - a total non-issue. Starliner has screens as well, and Dragon has critical switches as well. Starliner's extra buttons and joysticks don't mean anything, they're all flown by computer anyways.
@@Awesomes007 Wow, you're stuck in the 1995 Apple-hater camp aren't you? Funny how everyone has managed to do anything they want on them for decades lol. (Oh, and they created the market, along with touch-screen phones - but we all seem to forget that.) Go enjoy your blue screen of death during re-entry lmao.
A salute of admiration to the crew on board the ISSS and specially those which willingly let themself be blasted into orbit on board these seemingly jury-rigged spacecraft.
Pretty cool She's the first astronaut that I've seen or noticed who have tattoos. At least I've never noticed any other astronauts on the spacestation showing their tatt's. Again, pretty cool.
First time the US has two completely different and independant ways of getting into space! I love how Starliner looks so typically Boeing from the inside though! Might as well be the same plastics they use for the 787 :D
They only had two passengers for this mission so they used the remaining space to carry cargo. That is why you see the bags strapped up below the passenger seats.
Just imagine learning and training how to use every single control button, and fixing wiring in there. I'd be overwhelmed! It doesn't look like it, but that mic floating is going 17,500 mph is insane!
Starliner and Dragon are both quite a step up from a Soyuz. Being an astronaut is a job, and space flights are missions (assignments). They will gladly take any opportunity to be in space regardless of the spacecraft. It is what they volunteered and trained for.
NASA should thank the American taxpayers for all these wonderful spacecraft. We're often forgotten when the high fives go around. It would be a smart PR gesture to do this. Same with other federal agencies who take us for granted.
The private companies that receive taxpayer money so they can enrich their institutional shareholders should thank us even more, in the form of lower prices and lower funding requests.
@@user-ku7jn6fc6g Boeing received nearly twice what SpaceX did for this thing - and took twice as long to get it into orbit with crew (and still has issues). So yeah, the tax thing is still relevant.
I was going to say, how do you find peace of mind in such a cluttered and somewhat chaotic space... but the whole station is pretty much like that anyway. If you like simple and austere places, like the interior of a protestant church because they make you feel relaxed, the ISS is not the place for you, it's more like a baroque church interior full of adornments.
The Starliner controls reminded me of the Apollo controls full of dials and knobs. I would imagine after each flight it will take a couple of hours to reset the switches and knobs and verify they are all in the right positions.
They have a bunch of supplies in there, all those cube sized bags. Probably bringing them back to earth. That is where to additional crew seats will be located.
Starliner 😂😂 more like Bin liner . ...Think I would order a dragon 🐉 to be on the safer side of re-entry. Amazing footage 👏 stay safe 🙏 Blessings from Shitsville Hartlepool Teeside Northeast England ♒️ 🏴 🇬🇧 🙏 🙌 ♥️ Earth 🌎
How much did that cost? It carries how many people? It looks like an upgraded Apollo command module w/ vid screens. That's a 1960's design. Like the Russian Proton (which is a flying coffin). Sorry, I was expecting more from Boeings drawings - like enough room to at least move about and take a leak, like Dragon has. Enough for 6 crew members without crowding. It's also leaking helium and has a bunch of other issues. Boeing needs to be fired on this one. Let's hope Sierra's Dream Chaser is coming along better. I know we need more than one way up - Space-X - but this is NOT it.
The Starliner can carry up to 7 passengers and it is based on a Apollo design, which was ideal for re-entry and thermal protection. It also leverages the Space Shuttle's thermal protection system, so you could say that Starliner is a combination of two legacy spacecraft.
They used surplus boosters from the Shuttle program. This Artemis looks like an Apollo capsule..expanded by 20%. I want a refund of my taxes used to build this. Museum-piece.
@@deancarter9688 What are you even talking about? Starliner's primary baseplate TPS uses an ablative heat shield, nothing in common with the Space Shuttle.
@@EstorilEm It uses thermal blankets on its forward and mid heat shields, which is a technology that was used on and developed from the Space Shuttle program. Also the fact that it can carry up to 7 passengers (although a requirement driven by the ISS) is a similarity to the Space Shuttle.
Hi Suny. I am from India. Nice to see you once again on ISS. For last so many years I have seen most of the take off and landing of space shuttles, spacex. Saw starliner takeoff and will definitely watch landing too. Sany I saw your earlier video of tour of ISS. And now the well explained tour of Starliner. It seems to be very compact and clumzy. Looks very old type of interrior compaired to SpaceX. How many astronaughts it accomodate in a single capsule? I would suggest if you can shownit during sunlight. So that we can also see through the window provided. Thank You. Nitin.
It's a new space craft with an old and outdated design. Reminds me of the original Apollo space crafts. They should ask Spacex to design their next space craft.
@@user-pp5do8rm3w Ugh, not a good attitude! I guess in your frame of mind we should get rid of all technology and go back to the old days of Chrysler that broke down everyday.
@@user-pp5do8rm3w Maybe we should get rid of all technology altogether and go back to oil lamps and horse and buggy. Maybe keep fighting each other over gender, skin color, religion, and what continent you're born on. I wouldn't want you on my team that's for sure.
Boeing Starliner = Analog Era tech Space X Dragon = Digital Era tech No wonder it took them so much extra time and money to build Starliner, somebody had to hand wire all those buttons, toggles and controls. Then test each one, then rewire what was wrong over and over. Must be a rat’s nest of wiring behind each panel! There is def a cool retro-tactical aesthetic to having actual buttons and knobs, but so much of Dragon is automated and capable of being reconfigured instantly. You can’t do that on Starliner when there is an actual physical button needing to be un-pushed, or a toggle switch that’s up when it needs to be down. Also… each of Dragon’s workstations has full control by any other workstation. If someone is incapacitated in Starliner you’d literally have to push them out of the way to get to a needed button or control. In Dragon someone else can just open that menu and get to work without leaving their seat.
It's going to get in everything. I think it is rude to have your hair blowing or floating in people's faces, while some hairs shed and get stuck in machinery.
The Starliner looks like it was built in the 1970's...........SpaceX's Dragon capsule has no switches, warning lights or control levers. It is all controlled automatically and has just two screens to show systems. The Dragon looks like the future, Starliner the past......
SX has the necessary backup switches for critical functions. Boeing has 2 operating systems in the starliner. Computer touchscreen type and full manual operations. Hence, all of the switches. Considering their aircraft systems failures, this is a great thing.
I'm a former inspector for SpaceX. As much as I love the Dragon, I love buttons you can push and actual flight controls. I'm on the boomer/gen x line so buttons make more sense to me. I love how the Starliner actually looks like it has a cockpit. That being said, Dragon is Star Trek whereas Starliner is Star Wars. I think Dragon is going in the right direction. Congrats to Boeing.
I'm a little older and I like the tactile response of a switch or button vs a numb touchscreen, I equate it to today's cars vs the cars we drove 30 years ago. But the new generation of spacers have grown up with touch technology and trust in automation and Dragon and future spacecraft are for the young astronauts of today and tomorrow.
I also loved Boomer. That little dog sure helped a lot of people.
@@Columbus1152 if automation fails in space you're fucked even with buttons, same with a helicopter, it's not like a manual automobile or prop airplane... but i see how one can "feel" it to be more like a black box without buttons
you are a born diplomat. for me Starliner looks like an horror show spacecraft.
countless buttons, switches, cables all around.
Many people forget that Dragon has a row of buttons directly beneath the screens for all the important events
Looks bigger than the Dragon on the outside and smaller than Dagon on the inside.
Looks like a roosky Soyuz.
Old tech
Its both smaller inside and out
Looks like a piece of shit
@@NJTDover Soyuz is far worse.
I freely admit to being a die hard SpaceX fan. Yes, Starliner looks antiquated compared to Crew Dragon, but I am thrilled for Starliner, Boeing, and everyone involved with this tremendous accomplishment.
Now, if they would quit using used 737 parts in their spacecraft…I’d be a happy camper
@@RTD1947 It isn't. It shares zero heritage with the 737.
@@user-ku7jn6fc6gthe switches is
@@RTD1947 Chris Ferguson said the control panel has 787 heritage.
Sounds like you're an actual fan of space travel/exploration...not just a fanboy.
What use in mentioning who you like? The end goal is the same, correct?
Love the zero gravity hair styles! Congrats USN pilots of Starliner! Thanks for a great tour!
Yeah, but it could get stuck somewhere!
more hairspray she doesn't look ridiculous enough what a joke!
What@@Iris-en5qp
@Iris-en5qp
Funny that you focus on the hair... but have nothing to say about them floating around with no support wires.
@@funnyguy1487 well see you already know about greenscreen and wires so hair is just the obvious stupidity.
I always love her space tours; they are very informative.
Yeah, her full tour that she did years ago of the ISS is great.
WTF
@@rodneywatson7855 ?
@@easternyellowjacket276 yup.. I remember that too.. It was awesome. 😇
I love her space hair.
Great socks, Suni. I was looking at her bio and that woman can literally fly anything with rotors. Turn your lawnmower upside down and she'd make it fly.
great to see the contrast in design philosophy's between Boeing and SpaceX with respect to Astronaut UI. Starliner seems more traditional and "old school" vs Dragon
Yeah, I like the traditional design more
Why everything in the control / instrument panel were off ? Spacecraft in orbit needs all the instruments and monitors ON.
@@ShonMardani nah its powered down and the batteries are kept charged by the iss, less power draw
It's docked to the ISS, every spacecraft turns off when docked. Not like the shuttle@@ShonMardani
@@stvpls ; maybe they forgot to turn them on for filming.
True professionals. I hope they make it back safely. 😊
Suni, you are super pilot, you are legend
This is so cool. Thanks for showing me your house up there. From New York
fr
Thanks for the look around 🎉
Hello Suni.. I knew you way back when… amazing to see one of my old swim mates doing great things….
Love your tour
Why do I feel like I've time traveled back to 1969 when seeing the inside of Starliner?
I don't know. Probably because you're not a test pilot / astronaut. You think about what matters in these situations. Having a Cuisinart doesn't really matter much.
Old Space is best space.
Physical switches, probably
Have you ever played Reentry? It is a simulator for Mercury, Gemini and Apollo spacecraft. Try that and you will see, why it definitely does not look like apollo. Apollo had phyiscal switches everywhere all around. Every single function was controlled by physical switches. Even the control of the audio recording tape. The only thing remotely similar to a tablet was the 10-Digit input for the AGC, the DSKY - which btw has huge buttons. I wonder why....
@@BenRushhe's just stating what we are all thinking. Facts
I wonder how spacious and comfortable the capsule is when Boeing finally need to send 4 astronauts in ISS. When now it looks so messy and very tight Inside the capsule. However congratulations for the two astronauts finally made it into ISS safe and sound. Now the next step is return back to earth hopefully nothing bad happen to the capsule.
It's carrying cargo right now, hence why it looks a bit messy.
Thanks for sharing earth is an amazing place come home safely ❤
Much appreciated video and very interesting.
Me too
Compared to Dragon this looks a bit vintage style
Aircrafts used to have black dashboards back in 1960.. Then someone realized that there are colors that will make your working environment more pleasant 😁
Looks clunky compared to Dragon.
@@erika8357cockpit instruments remain universally black..
@@unfurling3129 it's not about color.... it's still toggles, switches, 100's of physical buttons. Dragon is mainly touchscreens.
Honestly I'd prefer a vehicle that I can manouvre by myself in emergency.
Dragon looks roomy and modern, while Starliner looks cramped and retro 1960's.
I think its due to one having real controls and one being expected to be flown by wire and preplanned mission guidance. I dont think dragon can be "flown"
Boeing had twice the budget so can have twice the buttons.
I don't think "roomy and modern" matters to test pilots. That's the sort of thing those who don't push boundaries think about.
@@asgaria8736Let's be honest with each other at this point. If space flight doesn't go EXACTLY as planned, it gets aborted like an unplanned high school pregnancy to a high class family.
Saying all of that, fly by wire with limited human intervention seems to make a lot more sense.
@@oldfredbear "If space flight doesn't go EXACTLY as planned, it gets aborted like an unplanned high school pregnancy to a high class family. "
Absolute bullshit. You have a narrow window before launch to "abort", but after that space flight is HUGELY dependent upon human interaction. Apollo 13? Gemini 8? Get a clue.
Really cool 👍🚀
Wow..
Admittedly am no expert but this looks so ancient in comparison to SpaceX...
Does that make a blind bit of difference and have you seen a similar on orbit demo of a spaceX capsule with a full load of cargo?
Honestly looks mean jack shit. Capability is everything. This Spacecraft has some issues with helium leaks (this can force an immediate abort since helium is needed to pressurize the RCS tanks) but I am sure they will get it sorted out.
A big THANK YOU to Space X for bringing space flight into the twenty first century!!!
Loved this presentation
thank you the great man and woman inspace...🎉🎉🎉
Suni - LOVE the socks! Thanks to you and Butch for the great tour of the vehicle.
Looks like a scaled up copy of Alan Shepard's Mercury capsule... How can Dragon look so streamlined and spacious while this thing looks like build in the 60's...
what a conjested, outdated mess compared to starlink
Actually, it's a scaled up version of an Apollo capsule.
Three years..and Boeing couldn't do any better than this?
It looks like something from a flea market.
Why everything in the control / instrument panel were off ? Spacecraft in orbit needs all the instruments and monitors ON.
The „because we always do it like that“ syndrome, which so many old companies suffer from
All spacecraft crews are awesome ❤Suni and all are very informative thanks to all of ISS Crews.
I'm glad you made it up there safely! The inside looks so Apollo with many panels of manual switches.
Inside the Starliner is super modern technology from the 1990s era!😮
Not really.... You are just used to Space X super sleek aesthetic
And that includes the microphone!
😂😂 my thoughts exactly
@@dray7276Spacex Crew dragon Functionality too... This thing scares the shit out of me with all the faults and leaks.
Hello from the UK 🇬🇧. Great to see you.
Cool
Thank for showing us around 🚀 🪐
This looks like the inside of 84 pickup truck as it's electrical system is being worked on.
“It’s dark outside? Bummer.” Wheezing.
Fascinating. Thanks for making this vlog. Well done 👍
Great job Suni. Give that girl a cigar.....and some rubber bands !
I agree the Starliner looks like it’s made from spare parts from a junk yard while Dragon looks like futuristic space capsule
I wouldn't say junk, just different.
LOL. And it leaked.
@@Egill2011 And the cooling system used more water than planned. And the thrusters failed. They had done work on the thrusters for 2 whole years before this flight because they didn't work during the last test either, and they were still crap. Starliner couldn't even dock on time because of all the issues. Starliner is a lemon that puts the lives of astronauts at greater risk than necessary.
Starliner had feedback from the astronauts during its designing. The astronauts wanted controls so they can fly it manually if need be.
Flying a spacecraft using tactile controls is preferred over flying it using touch screen. You think America’s top fighter jets are flown by iPad? 😂😅😊
Sunita Williams is always great to see, always so happy getting there, great to see her up there again!
Inspiring. All Support. 😊
I love aerospace/aeronautical engineering.
Looks like it was built in the 60’s.
You mean...the time we went to the moon?
Looks like you have no brain...
I met Butch back in 2003 at JSC on a High School trip. Awesome guy. Looking forward to seeing him and Sunni back home on Earth!
I love these tours, but whenever I hear “Oops!” It immediately makes my heart skip a beat!
I am a bit split in half in my opinion: while the Dragon Capsule certainly looks more sleek, near, futuristic - I think you are screwed when the screen fails. In Starliner, everything looks like in the 60ies, brought forward to an 80ies design, with some screens added (like in an airliner). As a pilot (or commander) I am not sure, if I would not still prefer real buttons and handles and knobs to steer the spacecraft rather than just wiping on a touch screen (?). But maybe you could still have made the cockpit look a bit more like a Tesla rather than a Soyus! 😂
Screen failures are exceedingly rare, like beyond rare, and there are redundant screens for redundant screens. If you were in some type of situation where some external force caused every screen to go out, it doesn’t matter what spacecraft you’re in and whether it’s controlled manually or automatically by screens, you’re probably no longer living. If only the screen failed, the craft would still be piloting itself. It’s really a non issue.
GM style design vs. Tesla minimalist design language!😮
The h*ll if I want to see the blue screen of death while out in space 😂 tactile controls for me, please
It can be entirely controlled remotely, and the screens can be reconfigured how/whenever they want. I believe their tablets can take over as well - a total non-issue. Starliner has screens as well, and Dragon has critical switches as well. Starliner's extra buttons and joysticks don't mean anything, they're all flown by computer anyways.
So spacex is like airbus and boeing is basically boeing.
Thank you for the tour Suni ! Cool socks and space hair ! ❤
...that was very cool...;)
Is that a Windows tablet? Truly on the cutting edge
It is if you want to do much beyond playing angry birds.
@@Awesomes007 Wow, you're stuck in the 1995 Apple-hater camp aren't you? Funny how everyone has managed to do anything they want on them for decades lol. (Oh, and they created the market, along with touch-screen phones - but we all seem to forget that.) Go enjoy your blue screen of death during re-entry lmao.
@@EstorilEm Apple has its fair share of issues too pal. Also the tablet isn't for re-entry
That's years behind spaceX, looks like the 80s
I salute you Naval Aviators and Astronauts!🇺🇸🫡
Thank you for showing the controls I always appreciate the more technical aspects especially as a student pilot ❤👍
A salute of admiration to the crew on board the ISSS and specially those which willingly let themself be blasted into orbit on board these seemingly jury-rigged spacecraft.
Pretty cool
She's the first astronaut that I've seen or noticed who have tattoos. At least I've never noticed any other astronauts on the spacestation showing their tatt's. Again, pretty cool.
First time the US has two completely different and independant ways of getting into space! I love how Starliner looks so typically Boeing from the inside though! Might as well be the same plastics they use for the 787 :D
Corruptions get you STARLINER
Cozy! (No awards for interior decorating however)
Really makes me appreciate Dragon
Thank You!
Looks like the inside of a late model pickup truck. This was made by the Boeing company.
They only had two passengers for this mission so they used the remaining space to carry cargo. That is why you see the bags strapped up below the passenger seats.
If I go to space I will flight Dragon Airlines, even in couch.
Magnificent!!
Excellent panels design.
Just imagine learning and training how to use every single control button, and fixing wiring in there. I'd be overwhelmed! It doesn't look like it, but that mic floating is going 17,500 mph is insane!
Yea but the entire planet is going at a crazy speed around the sun which is going at a crazy speed in the galaxy. It’s not really how it works
@@Everett-xe3eg really they are going sideways quick enough to avoid being pulled into earth but slow enough so they are not on an escape trajectory
After seeing this, I think NASA should let their astronaut choose the vehicle they wanted to fly.
They always do. No one is forced to take missions.
@@user-ku7jn6fc6g i dont think so, why would anyone step inside this shitbox
Most just wants to fly to space as long as the vehicle is certified safe by NASA.
Starliner and Dragon are both quite a step up from a Soyuz. Being an astronaut is a job, and space flights are missions (assignments). They will gladly take any opportunity to be in space regardless of the spacecraft. It is what they volunteered and trained for.
It was built like this so as to get Billy Nelson's approval. It looks like it did in his day😂
Our prayers are with you guys on re entry Good luck with your landing. I hope to God the craft holds together for the remainder of the mission.
Absolutely amazing.
Suni is a darling !
NASA should thank the American taxpayers for all these wonderful spacecraft. We're often forgotten when the high fives go around. It would be a smart PR gesture to do this. Same with other federal agencies who take us for granted.
The private companies that receive taxpayer money so they can enrich their institutional shareholders should thank us even more, in the form of lower prices and lower funding requests.
Tax isn't a gift, so no thanks needed.
It's not a NASA spacecraft. This is private sector.
this shitbox is not wonderfull
@@user-ku7jn6fc6g Boeing received nearly twice what SpaceX did for this thing - and took twice as long to get it into orbit with crew (and still has issues). So yeah, the tax thing is still relevant.
Awesome! and be safe 👍🚀🇳🇿
SO AWESOME! Perpetually falling to earth with all that space junk. No wasted space. Room for only the required. You gotta have strong toes in space!
Great job. You worked so hard to get to this place . Proud of you both! Thank you for your service.
How do they find anything with all of that clutter?
It's looks like Sanford and Son's junk spacecraft.
@@arthurhamilton5222
As Fred would say to Lamont..”YOU BIG DUMMY!”
I was going to say, how do you find peace of mind in such a cluttered and somewhat chaotic space... but the whole station is pretty much like that anyway.
If you like simple and austere places, like the interior of a protestant church because they make you feel relaxed, the ISS is not the place for you, it's more like a baroque church interior full of adornments.
@davidpage3893😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Starliner…Starliner, what I really want to know is…..did THEIR Booster Stick the Landing!,,,,,,,
yes it did they have video from a bouy at the landing coordinates and it had a active tracking camera to follow it down
@@The90accord22657 LOL … that was Starships booster not Starliners!!! The legacy booster drowned!!!
Thank you for uploading this video. I've been waiting for a video like this. Thanks.
The Starliner controls reminded me of the Apollo controls full of dials and knobs. I would imagine after each flight it will take a couple of hours to reset the switches and knobs and verify they are all in the right positions.
The cockpit of a 787 Dreamliner looks more sophisticated than this old relic from the 60’s and 70’s 😂😂😂
Compared to Dragon, looks so JUNKY! Did they GIVE the ship a NAME?
The name is Starliner.
Good question. They usually name them don't they. And NOT Starliner. Its usually Freedom or Endeavour or something similar.
This starliner capsule was named Calypso as i remember
"NASA astronaut Sunita Williams, commander of Starliner-1, named the spacecraft Calypso after Jacques-Yves Cousteau's oceanography vessel" - wikipedia
Why everything in the control / instrument panel were off ? Spacecraft in orbit needs all the instruments and monitors ON.
The seventies just called. They want the spaceship back
Sweet🎉❤
Well done on the launch & docking. (By comparison to Dragon this looks so outdated........)
Anyone else notice NASA had comments turned off for their version of the tour?
So? Life isn't a series of consipiracies, son.
Yes I did notice. I know they knew the public wouldn’t be impressed. I’m not impressed with this death trap!
@@rdnorris7355comments turned off precisely due to Boeing -hating internet trolls such as ^^this one ^^
@@kitcanyon658 But...but....Joe Rogan tells me what to think.
Trolls and brain rot, can’t stand it
Absolute champs…., man that’s tight…. And man about trust … trust in others…, their integrity and work..👍
Looks very cramped.
They have a bunch of supplies in there, all those cube sized bags. Probably bringing them back to earth. That is where to additional crew seats will be located.
Starliner 😂😂 more like Bin liner . ...Think I would order a dragon 🐉 to be on the safer side of re-entry.
Amazing footage 👏 stay safe 🙏
Blessings from Shitsville Hartlepool Teeside Northeast England ♒️ 🏴 🇬🇧 🙏 🙌 ♥️
Earth 🌎
Good stuff!!! You guys are awesome!
It's interesting to see the difference in design and engineering philosophies between SpaceX and the more established contractors.
Wow there’s a lot of bots/trolls in the comments who seem to judge a spacecraft purely by the size of the touchscreens
How much did that cost? It carries how many people? It looks like an upgraded Apollo command module w/ vid screens. That's a 1960's design. Like the Russian Proton (which is a flying coffin). Sorry, I was expecting more from Boeings drawings - like enough room to at least move about and take a leak, like Dragon has. Enough for 6 crew members without crowding. It's also leaking helium and has a bunch of other issues. Boeing needs to be fired on this one. Let's hope Sierra's Dream Chaser is coming along better. I know we need more than one way up - Space-X - but this is NOT it.
The Starliner can carry up to 7 passengers and it is based on a Apollo design, which was ideal for re-entry and thermal protection. It also leverages the Space Shuttle's thermal protection system, so you could say that Starliner is a combination of two legacy spacecraft.
They used surplus boosters from the Shuttle program.
This Artemis looks like an Apollo capsule..expanded by 20%.
I want a refund of my taxes used to build this. Museum-piece.
Why everything in the control / instrument panel were off ? Spacecraft in orbit needs all the instruments and monitors ON.
@@deancarter9688 What are you even talking about? Starliner's primary baseplate TPS uses an ablative heat shield, nothing in common with the Space Shuttle.
@@EstorilEm It uses thermal blankets on its forward and mid heat shields, which is a technology that was used on and developed from the Space Shuttle program. Also the fact that it can carry up to 7 passengers (although a requirement driven by the ISS) is a similarity to the Space Shuttle.
Hi Suny. I am from India. Nice to see you once again on ISS. For last so many years I have seen most of the take off and landing of space shuttles, spacex. Saw starliner takeoff and will definitely watch landing too. Sany I saw your earlier video of tour of ISS. And now the well explained tour of Starliner. It seems to be very compact and clumzy. Looks very old type of interrior compaired to SpaceX. How many astronaughts it accomodate in a single capsule? I would suggest if you can shownit during sunlight. So that we can also see through the window provided. Thank You. Nitin.
At least with zero G moving thru the connection between the scapecraft is easily to do I would expect. Thanks for the tour.
Is it just me or does it look old and outdated?
It's a new space craft with an old and outdated design. Reminds me of the original Apollo space crafts. They should ask Spacex to design their next space craft.
@@Thunderbyrd. Yeah I know it's new, but whoever designed it, was very backwards thinking
I don’t care what it looks like. Just do the job and keep the astronauts safe.
@@user-pp5do8rm3w Ugh, not a good attitude! I guess in your frame of mind we should get rid of all technology and go back to the old days of Chrysler that broke down everyday.
@@user-pp5do8rm3w Maybe we should get rid of all technology altogether and go back to oil lamps and horse and buggy. Maybe keep fighting each other over gender, skin color, religion, and what continent you're born on. I wouldn't want you on my team that's for sure.
Dragon does not need this antiquated hose ventilation stuff, if I am not mistaken… (?)
Dragon does have hose ventilation when docked with the ISS. The hose is from the ISS, not Starliner.
The hose is so the craft doesn't have to waste any finite life support resourses.
Boeing Starliner = Analog Era tech
Space X Dragon = Digital Era tech
No wonder it took them so much extra time and money to build Starliner, somebody had to hand wire all those buttons, toggles and controls. Then test each one, then rewire what was wrong over and over. Must be a rat’s nest of wiring behind each panel! There is def a cool retro-tactical aesthetic to having actual buttons and knobs, but so much of Dragon is automated and capable of being reconfigured instantly. You can’t do that on Starliner when there is an actual physical button needing to be un-pushed, or a toggle switch that’s up when it needs to be down.
Also… each of Dragon’s workstations has full control by any other workstation. If someone is incapacitated in Starliner you’d literally have to push them out of the way to get to a needed button or control. In Dragon someone else can just open that menu and get to work without leaving their seat.
I fkn love how naval ship terms are being used in space, it's like Space Battleship Yamato is gonna be real one day.
No elastic band to tie up all that hair?
It's going to get in everything. I think it is rude to have your hair blowing or floating in people's faces, while some hairs shed and get stuck in machinery.
Just for safety measure...
That hair could snag onanything.
Rubber bands don't work in space. Gravity.
@@kingjohn1974 🤡
@@kingjohn1974 Are you stupid or something? I want to explain this to you... but... I'd rather save the effort. Some are beyond saving.
Looks like a 15 ft wide soyuz crew descent module. But, it's a 15ft wide Apollo command module. I feel claustrophobic just watching this tour.
Apollo had WAAAAY more buttons and huge computers. Starliner's design philosophy is different than Dragon’s.
@user-ku7jn6fc6g
Well, NASA did stuff it with as many supplies as it could carry.
What a beautiful thing
My favorite American Italian Astronaut! She is great!
Crew dragon looks superior in every way, this looks like 80s tech.
The Starliner looks like it was built in the 1970's...........SpaceX's Dragon capsule has no switches, warning lights or control levers. It is all controlled automatically and has just two screens to show systems. The Dragon looks like the future, Starliner the past......
Automation is all good until it fails and you can't do anything.
SX has the necessary backup switches for critical functions. Boeing has 2 operating systems in the starliner. Computer touchscreen type and full manual operations. Hence, all of the switches. Considering their aircraft systems failures, this is a great thing.
@@arthurhamilton5222yes just like a Motorola phone with physical buttons
Damn. She’s been an astronaut for so long