Some people do, but I learned a valuable lesson back in the GRAW 1&2 days. Shit was so buggy and plagued with hackers that I always wait for future GW games to release and be reviewed after a few months before I even consider throwing down money on it.
What are you talking about? GRAW was never buggy for me, and I never saw 'hackers'. That game was amazing at the time. My friend and I used to grab SAW's and spawn-camp the hell out of people on Nowhere, Pagoda, and other maps.
When I played it, the game was plagued with wall hacks, invisibility hacks, you name it. It was completely intolerable. The campaign modes were fun, artwork was beautiful, but there were entire sections of the map that were unplayable due to CTDs. I wish I had the same experience as you, because aside from the bugs and hacks, GRAW 1 & 2 were excellent concepts.
I'm assuming that you played on PC; I didn't even have a gaming PC at the time, so I didn't consider that. It's pretty funny that the things that ruined your experience are features of Future Soldier. The GRAW games don't withstand the test of time, by the way. Which is a shame, because they were such good games at the time, that I really had hope for the series.
But it's not about the game. His point was how it looks. Jesus. How do people seem to miss this? This is why he has so many dislikes because people don't get what he's saying.
@@Clay_Bentonite Dislike doesn't mean they didn't understand. People understand perfectly well. They just disagree. People are still allowed to do that, I'm pretty sure.
@@Clay_Bentonite but he’s reacting to footage from e3 before the game released lol, it’s 2022 and I’m playing the game and it looks great and is insanely fun. People who play with the minimap on seem to enjoy it much less though
I think no matter what game comes out people are gonna hate it, and some people will love it. If you think it looks great, buy it. If you think it sucks dont buy it. Everyone fights over shit that is pretty pointless
Nick Hutchinson Its not a matter of opinion, but facts. Ubisoft have been realising bullshit, downgraded, broken pieces of mediocre shit. They are also falsely advertising their games which is bad for the consumers. I'd understand if it someone who doesn't like the Last of Us, but this isn't like that at all. The gaming business, but more specifically Ubisoft and EA, are going to shit. EA however is getting much better while Ubisoft isn't.
just dont preorder them and buy them after u saw a gameplay from the public version. so u avoid get scammed by downgrades. or just go ahead and download it cracked so u wont waste money
Nick Hutchinson its because Ubisoft has been outright lying during their demos(showcases) and treat the consumers like theyre dumbasses and its been working and they've still been making money
I hate this has 7k dislikes. These people disliking just want the game to be good and ignore the facts on how trash it looks. Trust me I want this game to be good too but the odds aren't in its favor.
i disliked it because its making alot of calls over 7 months in advance from an extremely negative outlook, the gameplay released at that point looked like trash ill agree but im waiting for the beta to make the judgement myself rather than watching a guy make such huge calls about how the game will be from a few trailers and very early gameplays
An Irish Potato but like every other game that had multiple months to be "polished" and "fixed" before and after the beta, it still (most likely) will be the same exact thing with a few minor tweaks that probably will take a fraction of the time to implement
I can't wait to ask Google what the reviews for this game are and hear her read off "67% Metacritic, 8.2 IGN, and a 7/10 Trusted Reviews." Ubisoft games nowadays always seem to hit a median rating. The kind of game you pick up at Target pre-owned for half off. The kind of game you forget you owned until someone else mentions having it.
two people who worked at Ubisoft left. That was around the time of all the bombings and bad stuff happening in the world, Rainbow Six Vegas 2 was their lead game they were working on AND they threw it away because of the bombings as that truthfully wouldn't be appropriate (really wouldn't.) and simply because those two left the company. I think once those two left Ubisoft.....Ubisoft died, as that was before Rainbow Six Siege even came out, and every game since I have seen or played by them made me disappointed or sad as I used to love every single game by Ubisoft but now I cannot barely stand the divison, The last update saved it ha, I used to want to break the division in half but mine was digital lol. Siege wasn't that great.. it was fun and could have had more work done on it, Isn't The division Ubisoft's most recent game? I have played RPG's and I love them, but Division had one heck of a weird RPG feeling. I am praying that this game actually does well, otherwise I am afraid as I think I AM COMPLETELY DONE PURCHASING UBISOFT GAMES... I never thought I would ever hate a game created by them but things change bad things happen.................
+fukoffleavemealone smi I think Ubisoft decided it was gonna be an RPG at the last minute. Yep, ever since Watch Dogs Ubisoft games have been disappointment after disappointment. The concepts of the recent Ubisoft games have been amazing though, but the deliverance has been half assed. Imagine how the games would've turned out if Naughty Dog or Epic Games had developed the games instead.
You seriously need to go back to school and learn what proper grammar is. Also you need to learn the difference between "Medium" and "Median". I can not take you seriously at all, "Ubisoft games nowadays always seem to hit a median rating.". You try and sound smart, but look incredibly uneducated.
+fukoffleavemealone smi what about Watchdogs 2 and For Honor? I think you should pay more attention to what they do with those two games. I don't think wildlands will make it.
Just because Rockstar does open world so well, everyone else thinks they can pull off an open world game but it's more than just a giant map . People like GTA because of its story driven gameplay, it's just a bonus it's open world.
Open world games like Skyrim,Red dead or the mighty Witcher 3 are very very difficult to handle,even skyrim ha dmany problems and issues...also these type of games need time and love from the developers otherwise they end up being crap and repeattive,something i doubt Ubisoft ever does because the only thing they care is money and u can clearly understand that from one particular thing,THE FALSE AVERTISING WITH THE DOWNGRATIONS!
This could be Watch Dogs 3, The Division 2... It all looks the same to me... The problem seems to be the culture. These games start off with a good base idea and then they just slap open-world on it as filler content that really doesn't add any value to the game. The long development cycles are just telling of the fact that the project is unorganized and has went through development hell. However, it's not just Ubisoft, it's the industry at large. They have these shareholders who know nothing about video games or have any sense of artistic integrity and who only care about their ROI and quarterly protections. The developers yell "we'll patch it later" and send it off to the printing press. We bitch on the forums and buy the next iteration of half-baked cookies with the crazy idea that this batch will be better than the last lol. We're part of the problem. Stop buying this stuff.
I can agree with you wholeheartedly. I have noticed that lately many of their games are starting to LOOK and 'feel' like the division. Are they saving costs by recycling the engine and assets? Their most recent announcement of games seem to almost not resemble anything like what they should.
"Are they saving costs by recycling the engine and assets?" yes they are, most of the vehicle models in the division where from watch dogs and then used again in watch dogs two and now in this too, many gun models are the same as they where in far cry 3
TheTeamSX everyone has their opinion I guess, I have actually enjoyed every ubisoft game I've played, and I have played literally every decent game that has come out so I have alot to compare with, some of you just forgot how back in the day most games were done and over in 8 hours or less..
"It's just a beta" is the shittiest argument ever. I've never played a beta and then seen actual gameplay change since that beta. There are just some minor bugfixes, UI updates and some balancing done after the beta. Sometimes not even that, depending on when the game is releasing. When games make an open beta just 2 weeks before launch, it's not even a beta. It's playable advertising for the game. They should call it "demo" or multiplayer demo" or whatever. It's not a beta. WildlandE3
This x1,000,000 ! So sick of all these "Don't worry it's only Alpha/Beta" .... it's like these people have never played an Alpha version and then the release version, so naive and makes them look like corporate puppet fanboys who have only been gaming for a month. Painful.
Beta is literally just an excuse at this point. Every game dev on earth loves to have a beta, that way when people find out about the shitty stuff in their game, people can say, "Its in beta shutup!"
fireapple9 Exactly. That's why the always have a watermark with "alpha footage" or pre-alpha footage". That's an excuse in case their showcase is shit. "Don't worry, it's only alpha. I will change" and then it doesn't change.
I'm going to play devils advocate here and say that Warframe and Subnautica have changed heavily in their beta stage...buuuut this is Ubisoft and I completely agree give us some good graphics and gameplay like the Witcher Series or Star Citizen. WildlandE3?
+dion martin So all game developers should have the level of skill that CD projekt red have, or the shouldn't bother making games? This game and the Witcher3 are entirely different. Witcher3 had open world areas, it wasn't an entirely open world game.
+Hijynx87 people kno they make great games (like Ubisoft) but EA has many problems when it comes to micro transactions and fucked up servers, and then Ubisofts problem is with downgrading, although the guy in this vid is just pure stupid, it hasn't been downgraded, no game looks like it's trailer but the gameplay from 2 years ago still looks the same now, no downgrade
They're both as bad as each other to me: Ubisoft - Bad business practices, unfinished games, poor quality games, insulting gamer's intelligence (30 fps is cinematic lol) EA- Extremely piss poor business practices, lacklustre games (mirrors edge catalyst/Star Wars battlefront), anti consumer.
+Nathaniel hmmm I can agree with most of that but I do love a lot of Ubisoft's games, like Assassin's Creed 2-black flag, I also liked watch dogs and the crew, oh and far cry series, and from EA I only like battlefield tbh
You know what I think is the funniest thing about this game? You can't snap into cover. But in Resident Evil Umbrella Corps, you can snap to cover, and the enemies don't even use a gun. Umbrella Corps is trash and it even has snap to cover.
I didnt understand the whole open world argument. Metal Gear 5 was an amazing game lol. Also 20 -25 hours in a series where the story has never been that long, how is that a flaw? I know this is an old video, and i love you to death man, but I'd consider giving this game a chance after all this time
I would love to focus on the positives of this game, but there is none. The game looks so bad. It's been in development for how so long, and they used it all to make open world. There's no cover mechanics, there's lackluster shooting, there's the awkward camera switch from 3rd to first, there's no positives. There's nothing special about this game. Ubisoft always had problems with open worlds. They need to listen to their fans. It's ridiculous. This is like spending 9 hours working on an essay, and giving 1 body paragraph. It's garbage, and there's no way they can fix this garbage in 7 months. WildlandE3 (Also, just subscribed)
There is no way that Wildlands will be GOTY when you have Zelda, Horizon: ZD, Mass Effect, Star Citizen and God of War releasing in the same year. No possible way.
William Larsson I'm calling it now, Zelda: Breath of the Wild will be aweful. We've seen next to nothing for it other then very poorly edited screenshots in 2013 and a very, very limited gameplay...if that even was gameplay. It's even widely believed at this point Breath of the Wild won't drop until December of next year, so it will be it's 6th delay. The only two games I can think of that have been delayed this many times are Spore and Duke Nukem: Forever and well...we all know how those turned out
Well Said, My sub as well. I have never played a Ubisoft game yet and may never, but this definitely changed my view on how i see ubisoft games and there play style.
CuddleCorp Gaming not all their games are bad I mean ghost recon future soldier was great rainbow six siege is good and depending on what games you like the division is pretty fun with friends
I've recently finished Ghost Recon: Wildlands and in my opinion, I loved the game. I agree with most parts of what you said like that the world is a plain of boringness but the missions just have a different taste to it and that's what kept me going in the game.
I don't, but this is my channel, so I'm going to give my opinion without giving a fuck if it pisses anyone off. You guys have the comments section to speak your mind. I have the video.
BigfryTV You've got the video, yeah? Ah, that explains you criticising other people in the comments then. Thats why you *had* to give *your* remark on my passing comment. Us lesser folk don't get that. Not condescending *atall..* I'm not complaining about your content atall so i dont know where you got that from. It was an opinionated video so yknow.. Why watch if i didnt want to hear? Its just the way you arse around the comments asif your opinion in some way holds more value than anyone else's.
BigfryTV I didnt say that either? Bahahah *I think someones a little insecure, christ.* You critique games, can someone not have criticism about you? I enjoyed this video, i simply made comment. How about "i disagree" instead of "you're wrong" and y'know.. *not* dragging false phrases out of peoples mouth's like an awfully written joke. I mean, you're further proving my point and I'm not even expecting nor wanting to get a reply.
"Its just the way you arse around the comments asif your opinion in some way holds more value than anyone else's" Explain to me what I say to make you think I believe my opinion holds more weight than yours? Its an opinion...
I've been playing these Ghost Recon games since the very first. I know this is going to suck. I will play the alpha and beta but this is not looking good for the franchise at all. Especially since there is no multiplayer. Which is just stupid.
NujuBIONICLE even tho siege doesn't have many game modes it's an amazing game with great replayability and graphics. other than that, every ubisoft game I've played recently sucks. I miss splinter cell
Dude everything you said in the video is the truth. People don't like to see the truth but I see it because I played every other ghost recon and ghost recon needs competitive multiplayer without it , it's a one time playthrough ghost recon just like watchdogs and fry cry. Open world games are kinda ruin gameplay creativity something you barely see anymore.......
you say ARMA, but im not very good at games like arma / squad / operation flashpoint. however i loved the mercenaries game series and just cause 2. what i want is a less difficult / easy ARMA game, and this looks like it.
This is going to sell games, no matter how much the concept is far cry and the game play is the division. It's not going to be a 20 hour game. It's going to be 10 hours of quality content and stuffed with repetitive side quests. Again, everyone already knows.
I thought this game looked like it would be pretty cool, but after see gameplay, it looks like boring ass Far Cry 4 or something. Metal Gear Solid V made up for the not so interesting open world, with great gameplay and story. Far Cry 3 (unlike 4) had an amazing story to make up for the repetitive gameplay (plus the radio tower climbing in Far Cry 3 seemed so much better than 4 imo). Ubisoft seems like they just throw out the same game with a different title and flashy trailers and then downgrade the graphics and that's absolutely unacceptable.
to be honest Farcry 3 had a shit story. don't get me wrong I loved Farcry 3, it sits in my top 10 games list. I think when Ubisoft finds a game style (e.g. open world, climbing towers to unlock the map, Bases scatted across the map to liberate.) that is very profitable they quickly make more and more games in that style to make even more profit.
I agree. Same thing with Assassins Creed. Loved the way the story was going throughout the first few games and then they convoluted the shit out of it and made it way more confusing than it had to be. They then gave us gimmicky shit like sailing in boats....
I personally see black flag (if that is what you mean) as a pretty good game, i love the fact it combines swashbuckling battles and parkour, I think the voice acting and story are pretty good too. But the latest AC's are a bit frustrating with their poorly optimized gameplay and lack luster stealth, gameplay, etc.
Absolutely "unacceptable"? Says who? You? I enjoyed far cry 4 immensely and thought it told a way better story than far cry 3. As for MGS 5? Mgs 5 is a far cry rip off in first person and has an abysmal story too, not even worthy of metal gears name
Such a shame to see such a promising game get turned into a online multiplayer shooter. If you go to the comments section, its a little disheartening to see how many people say that it looked like trash
Owen Bunny It feels like R6S was a concept Tom Clancy thought up, as well as The Division. Like they weren't something Clancy wrote about in a book, but instead made a list of things he thought the country whould do if the situation arises. Speaking as if the country were to be under actual grave danger of biological and infrastructural attack, The Division could be made to counter it, or if terrorism were to become so covert as in R6S, a real counter-terror team of a mix of the best operatives from around the world would step in. Clancy's usual works, such as early Ghost Recon, were military sci-fi, but these feel more like simple "what ifs" that they had him think up, and they ran with it.
Honestly it's kind of funny to see how many people are saying you shouldn't judge a game before it comes out, even though most of the people saying that are probably the same people who also contributed to the 3 million dislikes on the Infinite warfare campaign trailer and the bandwagon of hate that was placed on the game BEFORE it came out.
It's like, you can judge all you want about how good something is going to be and preorder the shit out of it, but the moment someone says "nar this doesn't look up to scratch with a lot of other releases," you're being unfair ??????? wassup with that my dudes
ItzStayTrill thats one of the reason pre orders are bad and just going to make some dev greedy.People need to pressure developers into making a good game instead of pre ordering it because it looks cool in the trailers but then the actual product sucks.
Spot on, most people can't see the lack of effort ubisoft really puts into their new games and the countless insulting, in your face downgrades. WildlandE3
Every Ubisoft game has borrowed mechanics from their other IPs to the point that when you've played one you've played them all. The only game that hasn't fallen to this is Splinter Cell and I think part of that is because it is still linear.
the sad reality is that companies like ubisoft who dont give a f@ck about community and actual players earn so much money!... the sad reality is that people like piewwhateverpie make so much money and he is not even funny or something... but thats the word we live in
pewdiepie is very entertaining to watch if u've watched him for awhile, although he can scream like a child at times, he is funny as hell to some people, other people hate him because they dont find him funny and that he's the biggest youtuber. but u're right about ubisoft.
Nobody is forced to play Ubisoft games. Nobody is forced to watch Pewdiepie. Under capitalism you have the freedom of choice because of the free market. Is your alternative state mandated entertainment where Ubisoft is the only game developer?
An you are completely right the game is piss poor overhyped piece of shit an if they had a multiplayer depending on how that is I would be willing to pay at most £1 for the game
WildlandE3 I don't find most Ubisoft games boring, the Far cry series was pretty entertaining but I am getting a very MGS V vibe from this game. I honestly wouldn't mind if it was like a Far cry/ Mgs V mash up though I'm not sure many would agree
Sal ty WHO the Fuck likes far cry anymore, the first one was good, the second was unique, the third and forth were the same but still Shit. primal is basically the past equivalent game of infinite warfare
WILDLANDE3! I was hyped to see the gameplay at E3. I was left bitterly disappointed. Total bollocks. Will not be touching this game. I was astounded to see a lot of RUclipsrs talking about it afterwards in a positive light, and fueling the hype train. I'm like "did you just watch the same fucking shit that I did?"... I appreciate the honesty on this channel. Subbed
RUclips: hey this video is from 5 years ago and he hasn't looked at ghost recon stuff in ages so why is there any reason to recommend this? RUclips: wait... I'm RUclips fuck it here you go
Ubisoft is really going down hill. this is pissing me off!!! This is the company that made fuckin AC2 and Brotherhood. And this looks like shit. I paid 60 bucks for the division and it was decent but still shit. C'mon Ubisoft you downgraded Watchdogs, Siege, and the Division. besides unity was shit and syndicate was just made to say, "sorry for releasing a shitty game". Looks like the only thing to look forward to is BF1.
WHATSaDavid Gotta disagree with you there. Siege is quite honestly one of the best Ubisoft games released in the past few years. I've been playing it since release, and I'm still finding new tactics and strategies on every map. Its also one of the most teamwork oriented games I've ever played as well. I think its alright that there is no singeplayer, as the multiplayer can offer thousands of hours of gameplay.
got to agree with T VB. it seem repetitive but the games are so different even if your playing the same map and mode. there are so many ways and strategies, it's really fun.
Judging by the gameplay video, compared to the previous title like ghost recon future soldier, the animation and the recoil and other stuff just feels really off, the camera movement feels looks really choppy, the movement looks really choppy, the animation looks really choppy, etc....i mean yea there will be a lot of people bashing on this opinion who says "you haven't played the game, shut the fuck up until you buy it and play the game" yea i wouldn't want to play the game if just by looking at the gameplay which is the first impression makes me doesn't want to play the game in the first place, it's just how it works, people, the marketing team gave us something to judge to convince us to go and buy the game and it failed.
But i really hope they fix these issues, but with today's situation of gaming industry, i really have low expectations for it, which a really big shame because this game has a HUGE potential of being a great fucking game
Usually the first things they polish up before release is animation, vfx, and generally how it looks, so it will probably be way cleaner with the 60fps standards of most next gen compatible games when it's ready for more than just a demo.
I love his argument about the 3rd and 1st person motorcycle. Like, the guy was moving the whole time so after shooting and switching views (while moving) he is going to be closer.
Also, the E3 gameplay for The Division was extremely different from what we got on the release date. Comparing this to the beta when the video your talking about is E3 gameplay doesn't make sense. The beta for The Division was pretty accurate to the game at release. The part I agree on is that something does look off about the gameplay. Idk what though. Wildlands E3.
+Matt Baldwin I do see why people are mad. In Wildlands the graphics don't look too great, so in my opinion it can't get worse and I'm glad the gameplay is not misleading, unlike The Division.
This looks like Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter. Wtf is this. Complete downgrade from the previous released gameplay like every single game we get now.
+Jon Gass GR:FS was pretty great, but the multiplayer was a bit rage inducing at times since the cover and CQC system wasn't that fluid. If that was a title released today with constant updates adding more and more guns and maps and modes procedurally, it would be right below GR:AW In my favouritism.
+AHS Valor (Val) yeah graw was awesome man. If only they could release the 2 graw's and future soldier so that way I can get that 3 pack thing and play them all. If GRFS was out now honestly I'd play it more than wildlands
For multiplayer I think they should include a mode where the Ghosts fight against the Drug Cartel in claiming the drugs during a certain period of time. They have to defend the cargo and they also have vehicles. Meanwhile, the Ghosts have to use tactics to prevent it from getting to the destination. Or you could also do a Ghost that went rouge and other Ghosts have to find him or her.
WildlandE3 I think you might be right. All that means to me is dont buy it on release day and don't preorder. Wait for the right moment after there has been some real gameplay to look at.
Call of duty and Ubisoft games need to take a page out of battlefield 1/battlefront's play book and get a fucking engine that looks new gen. All this gens cod and ubisoft games, look like they could be running on a overclocked ps3. No excuse anymore that cod wants the game running in 60fps, so they take a hit on graphics. Look at what frostbite does. Cod is rinse, repeat shit at this point. Get a new fucking engine, 3 studios, w/ 2 years in between cods now and they still look like trash.....lazy fucks. Dishonored 2 is another that looks like blocky shit, with zero animations and ps3 physics. No excuse for ps3 grafix this point......bring on ps5 or gtfo
Dru Blanks their obvious CGI trailer really showed us how good the graphics are!.... ops... and do not get me wrong, Red Dead Redemption is done by the GOOD rockstar developers, the people who created the RAGEngine and use it in the best way possible... but the trailer was obvious CGI...
Pretty much my plan. Who the fuck keeps buying these no-effort copy and paste ubisoft games? How is this company still making money when they shit out bland, empty open world games with no content?
the real issue for me is how arcade like its going to be if i have to shoot half a clip to someones chest to kill him , this game goes directly to "ahhh i'll play it when i have nothing else to do"
Pele sch exactly, don't get me wrong it doesn't bug me a whole lot but i hate games where you have to shoot enemies in the head twice to kill them. Granted idk if it's this game but still
I liked rainbow six just for that reason. One shot, one kill or almost. One error and you're down: tactics and planning were fundamental. Good times. I also think it's not fun to kill brainless thugs, it's easy. I wonder why they never worked on high AI for the enemies, that for example are supposed to be in radio contact and should react even if you kill in perfect silence. Things like the one I mentioned, smart bastards to kill, not open world but reactive world!
THENOTOFFICIALMLGPAGE well, you're right, but hey it's a first person shooter, what do you expect? The game is supposed to be a "go in and take them all down" type of game. But player's decision were fundamental, along with the ability to respond to unexpected situations with smart moves. The same way to go in a room could be wrong in the next mission, depending on the weapons employed, the enemy's numbers and tactics and so on. I enjoyed it. In Athena's sword there were a lot of open-space actions too and those missions needed a fairly high amount of strategy to finish the mission with no casualties.
Actually, fuck this. Why can't Ghost Recon go back to how it was on THE FIRST GAME? Since the sequels started I just stopped giving a shit about them. The first one was just nearly perfect, big-ass maps where you can aproach your objective from different directions, perfect for Coop, long singleplayer story, cheap expansions... And now instead we get this shit. And a few years ago, Ubisoft made Ghost Recon F2P, which sucked infinite balls. Seriously, why don't they just kill the franchise anyway, not like they haven't killed Prince of Persia, Beyond Good and Evil or Rayman (which took them years to revive) before.
I second you- If some were to remake the original Ghost Recon as a new game, with modern graphics, while still keeping the original gameplay, I would buy it right away- it's been over 15 years now, so F it, I'm re-creating the GR campaigns myself in the Arma 3 Engine for the past few weeks.
jarrad 96 I got them all on Steam for like 1€ because the old CD's were just DEAD and I couldn't install the game anymore, and I still think it's better than all Ubisoft titles we have gotten these last years.
SleepyGuyy That game had a rather realistic gameplay and lots of planning. This game does not have any of that. Also, that game was NOT open world, it had huge maps for the time, but not open world. This game has it because every game seems to need it these damn days.
WILDLAND E3 ---- The gaming industry is conning us all. Pre-orders are part of this. at one time developers used guys to test games before release you use to get game demos in magazine developers wasn't scared to show their games. Now they hide the game development it comes out you pre-order it before release and the company doesn't have to worry about the game not being finished because so many still buy the game and accept garbage. with microtransactions and dlc. games didnt use to have dlc. you use to get a full game on release. dlc is just a money maker they build the game then cut out levels. and now games come out unfinished. i can't believe what direction the gaming industry is going. its dying. greedy companies are ruining gaming. and that's the truth. if we didnt buy pre-orders and hold money in your wallet until you get a full game. these companies are not putting any love into games. not all developers but some EA. Bethesda going downhill. Bungie. and look at anthem. and fallout 76. and more. fanboys have no idea whats going on with games. they will accept anything. pisses me off. am fed up with the way games are these days. and dont even mention Ubisoft. fuk.
Well I think the tech has come on a bit here (actually this area shown in the demo is one of the worst looking). A bit. An alarmingly tiny 'bit' from lat-gen titles like RDR or even Operation Flashpoint.
Yep. Spot on. Red Dead and GTA V both look a hell of a lot better than this game. At first i thought "Oh, it's Alpha, plenty of time to fix" but after watching the vid it made me realise that actually they really haven't got that long to fix it so it's unlikely to to change.
This is when you tubers get so entitled to their opinion that they spend their review trying to defend their opinions instead of taking an unbiased approach.
True but graphics aside, the game looked clunky. Also the thing is that, atleast personally I don't care about graphics that much, but when game looks amazing in trailers and descent in reality it's kinda disappointing
Aapeli Hölttä well that is everygame i mean i'm not to hyped myself but everyone deserves a nes chance. everyone hate on ubisoft even though they are multiple different divisions
If you don't care about graphics, and just Gameplay and Performance, like myself, the game looks like a fucking great game, And your statement about kids being salty is really quite dull and nonsensical, kids play COD, BF, and shit like that. They don't play "Realistic" Open World Military Shooters. The game looks great, graphic Whores are the salty ones here...
I loved Ghost Recon, now I'm scared. You were hoping for competitive multiplayer so the game can hold up to the flaws, and I hoped for local couch co-op for me and my best friend to play the campaign. Ubisoft is fucked now, they did the downgrading even before Watch Dogs, they did it on Farcry 3 and I think that is when it started, they think they can be lazy and sneaky and lying to their players and they can't do that. Rainbow Six Vegas 2 was my favorite game, 7 years later, they fucking ruined the entire franchise, and I hope they don't do it to Ghost Recon, I'm going to wait a couple days to a week and wait to see gameplay and reviews at launch and I'll buy the game if Ubisoft doesn't lie to us again. I can give many more examples of their false advertisements and criminal acts to gamers. Tom Clancy would be disappointed if he were still alive. Thanks Bigfry, you opened my eyes and I thank you for it.
Alright, thanks, man. I only just subscribed and already you are making an effect on me and other gamers, I just hope people open their eyes and listen. Thanks again.
@BigfryTV, Are you playing on PC or console? I would imagine the trailer was shot in a higher resolution, so perhaps playing the game in 4K will be the same.
+Dave Smith I know why is every new game 60$. the only ones worth that are like sky rim. overwatch's graphics are garbage and only has multi player its defiantly not worth 60$ but it costs that much anyway
Finally someone talked about the shitty movement. Grand Theft Auto and The Division had good movement, and it didn't feel like you were just gliding around, it felt like you had real weight.
Grand Theft Auto has great movement? Wtf have you even tried to make a jump or walk across a thin line in that game with any amount of accuracy? Sure it looks realistic, but it takes away some control from the player to achieve that.
I think it's a lot of fun just sneaking and working out a problem looking for an exfill closest to you under heavy fire. The coordination that can be used is actually crucial. Only an opinion
wildlande3 The flying, skydiving, and parachuting looks like good mechanic "i think" but that's about it. I agree it looks boring as hell compared to how much there is to do in GTA 5 even it's an old game. I would pick that over wild lands for an open world game with missions. With the ceo/vip/mc aspect they have now there is so much to do. i in general don't like ubisoft, they don't do anything with games after they are released to make them better if they suck from the get go
Kragon & Rodawg I agree just look at what happened with Assassin's creed Unity, they made an apology video and gave everyone who bought the game free Dlc and a free new game cause it ducked and was bugged all to hell. Ubisoft needs to take a few years off from developing any video game and refresh themselves.
It is a shame what happened to Ghost Recon and Rainbow Six. They aren't the great tactical games they used to be. This game isn't Ghost Recon, it has nothing to do with what Ghost Recon was ugh. But try to tell that to the mainstream players who will hunt you down for saying something bad about their favorite Publisher, thinking they need to defend a corporation who doesn't give a damn about them nor their IP's, just wanna cash in while they can. This game might be fun, i don't know, haven't played it. But as a fan of Tactical games, the Ghost Recon name has become a slap in the face, reminding me of how tactical fans made the IP big just to see it being taken away to please people who already have a thousand other games too chose from being pleased. Just like Rainbow six...i miss the old day's when we were tested as gamers, instead of all this action driven fast paced shooter stuff.
I actually really like Rainbow Six Siege and think thatit doespreserve thetactical combat style of play but this game does look like a bit of a disappointment so far, things could change but then again they also might not for Wildlands. I hope they do because I've always loved Tom Clancy games
sad reality is that the tacticle shooter fan base is very small... There is a reason so many casual games are coming out and becoming huge (overwatch) and not many tacticle games are(escape tarkov and arma 3) ubisoft is being bought out and they need anything to make them more popular and more money and that is what this game is... would I prefer an arma 3 like wildlands? yeah, but we are a micro group compared to the massive casual community...
If you're talking about the REAL Rainbow Six 3:Raven Shield from the PC, then I agree. If you mean the horrendously watered-down console R63, then pass...
I bought this game a few days ago and have around 24 hours played so far. In my opinion, this game is a lot of fun! This video is irrelevant right now because it came out 7 months before releasing, but there is a lot in the video that just didn't really hit the predictions it made. The graphics are beautiful (If you're playing on PC) and in my head a console player is not in the position to talk shit about graphics. For one reason.. consoles have downgraded graphics because it sacrifices just that to get a steady 30/60 fps depending on the console and the game. (I don't really know what FPS consoles gets on this particular game, so I'm not the one to speak here) Wildlands is also a great game to play with a few friends if you're into stealth, because it's really important to cooperate in order to take out or go through a town or base unnoticed. I can agree that the story missions do get a little repetetive, but I don't really mind that because the gameplay kind of makes up for it, in my opinion. If you do get tired of all the story missions, a great thing to do is to find intel on the whereabouts of new weapons and weapon equipment around the map. It's just a fun and exciting thing to do. The switch from third to first person when aiming is not that bad anymore, but if you don't like it, you can change to over the shoulder aiming which is great. Driving is still pretty shit, not gonna lie. The open-world is really beautiful and it's just big enough to keep you entertained for quite a few hours when exploring. All in all, I would say that it's worth buying if you're into these kinds of cooperative stealth games. Not only stealth but military shooters all around. And before someone feels like calling me a "Ubisoft fanboy" I would just like to say that I never really cared for Ubisoft because they are money hungry, cashgrabbing, douchebags which never really seem to get any game right. But this game is fine.. really. (:
Ac Unity, AC Syndicate, AC Chronicles Trilogy, The Division, Rainbow Six, Watch Dogs, Far Cry Primal, I don't get it, all these games aren't enough to snap people out of whatever charm or spell Ubisoft has them under, I just don't fucking get it. Steep and For Honor looked so cool at their reveals, now For Honor is starting to look less and less interesting the more they show, like The Division did and Steep looks like it's probably going to get old fast when all you can do in an open world is race, but I'll just wait until they show more footage. Ghost Recon is just going to be another disappointment, all the warning signs are starting to show. I hope ubisoft proves me very wrong when this comes out but they've disappointed me on that as well, multiple times.
I can't speak for the other games but I didn't find watchdogs or R6 that bad. I got watchdogs a few months after it came out for dirt cheap and can say it was worth the playthrough and just got the R6 starter edition and have been no lifeing it for the past week and has become my new favorite competitive game.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but Rainbow Six Siege is not a shitty game. It's mechanics are new and innovative, doing something that's never been done before in a multiplayer fps. The graphics did face a downgrade (as expected) overall they aren't the best, but they are still acceptable.
The division has awesome graphics and gameplay. Maybe you need your eyes checked? Wildlands doesn't even look like the same engine as the division, figured they would have built from that?
Why don't people open their eyes and realie ALL of Ubisoft games in the past 5-8 years have just been getting more and more half assed then ever before. Future Soldier was a good game, wasn't super amazing, but it was good. Why couldn't they of just went with a second one of that? Open world games are so fucking bad these days I truly don't care about them unless they're coming from a select few of developers!
If anybody remembers Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction, then just remember that game will still be better and funner to play then this fucking game!
Gta v and witcher 3 are both excelent open world games. I would even say that witcher 3 is the best game ever made. Valiant hearts is really good ubisoft game btw.
The best Ubisoft games are the ones where they try something different. Whether that be a big production like Rainbow Six: Siege or small experiments like Grow Home.
I was done with Ubisoft after AC: Revelations, GR:FS and FC3. Everything after that screams that the company fell. I still love Tom Clancy and his fiction, and enough so to wish some other company took up making these games.
I like how people still get tricked by Ubisoft. This happens with literally every game.
Some people do, but I learned a valuable lesson back in the GRAW 1&2 days. Shit was so buggy and plagued with hackers that I always wait for future GW games to release and be reviewed after a few months before I even consider throwing down money on it.
What are you talking about? GRAW was never buggy for me, and I never saw 'hackers'. That game was amazing at the time. My friend and I used to grab SAW's and spawn-camp the hell out of people on Nowhere, Pagoda, and other maps.
When I played it, the game was plagued with wall hacks, invisibility hacks, you name it. It was completely intolerable. The campaign modes were fun, artwork was beautiful, but there were entire sections of the map that were unplayable due to CTDs. I wish I had the same experience as you, because aside from the bugs and hacks, GRAW 1 & 2 were excellent concepts.
I'm assuming that you played on PC; I didn't even have a gaming PC at the time, so I didn't consider that.
It's pretty funny that the things that ruined your experience are features of Future Soldier.
The GRAW games don't withstand the test of time, by the way. Which is a shame, because they were such good games at the time, that I really had hope for the series.
Yep, PC version sucked.
Personally i love this game
But it's not about the game. His point was how it looks. Jesus. How do people seem to miss this? This is why he has so many dislikes because people don't get what he's saying.
@@Clay_Bentonite Dislike doesn't mean they didn't understand. People understand perfectly well. They just disagree. People are still allowed to do that, I'm pretty sure.
@@Clay_Bentonite 1:23 no it isn’t
@@Clay_Bentonite the graphics on PC with ultra settings is really good
@@Clay_Bentonite but he’s reacting to footage from e3 before the game released lol, it’s 2022 and I’m playing the game and it looks great and is insanely fun. People who play with the minimap on seem to enjoy it much less though
I honestly didn’t understand the hate this game got I still play it today.
Same here bra
me too lmao I thought I was the only one
I used to play it on ps4 alot, but I switched to pc about a year ago, is the pc version alive?
I guess when your standards are in the dirt, anything is good!
The answer was simple.... Bigfry does not like open world games, he plays competitive multiplayer... and that's OK.
I actually REALLY like this game.
I bought it a month ago and I am having fun :) Die Sicario's!
Just started in 2022 and I’m hooked. I feel like people who play with the mini map turned on also have a much lesser experience.
Maybe you could drop a review 5 years later because the game has improved a lot.
@Beaverish Buck Teeth It has changed a lot for the better.
I totally regret buying this game
its a good game now but its 5 years too late
@@bobboro4088 Why?
@@bobboro4088 Maybe your one of those guys who plays a game for 2 hours and when found a little boring goes on to talk shit?
I think no matter what game comes out people are gonna hate it, and some people will love it. If you think it looks great, buy it. If you think it sucks dont buy it. Everyone fights over shit that is pretty pointless
Nick Hutchinson Its not a matter of opinion, but facts. Ubisoft have been realising bullshit, downgraded, broken pieces of mediocre shit. They are also falsely advertising their games which is bad for the consumers. I'd understand if it someone who doesn't like the Last of Us, but this isn't like that at all. The gaming business, but more specifically Ubisoft and EA, are going to shit. EA however is getting much better while Ubisoft isn't.
ur right ;D
just dont preorder them and buy them after u saw a gameplay from the public version. so u avoid get scammed by downgrades. or just go ahead and download it cracked so u wont waste money
Nick Hutchinson its because Ubisoft has been outright lying during their demos(showcases) and treat the consumers like theyre dumbasses and its been working and they've still been making money
Nick Hutchinson is so right
I hate this has 7k dislikes. These people disliking just want the game to be good and ignore the facts on how trash it looks. Trust me I want this game to be good too but the odds aren't in its favor.
i disliked it because its making alot of calls over 7 months in advance from an extremely negative outlook, the gameplay released at that point looked like trash ill agree but im waiting for the beta to make the judgement myself rather than watching a guy make such huge calls about how the game will be from a few trailers and very early gameplays
saying that it probably will be shite
An Irish Potato Glad to hear your opinion thanks for being a reasonable person and not a dick bag due to our somewhat different opinions.
ice zilla the beta was out and I played it , the game is good
An Irish Potato but like every other game that had multiple months to be "polished" and "fixed" before and after the beta, it still (most likely) will be the same exact thing with a few minor tweaks that probably will take a fraction of the time to implement
Hey im from the future and the game is actually really good
@Swiss go to play cod
@Swiss you don't understand it
Agreed
Wait what? 4 years ago?
Pvp was vibin but breakpoint ruined it
I can't wait to ask Google what the reviews for this game are and hear her read off "67% Metacritic, 8.2 IGN, and a 7/10 Trusted Reviews." Ubisoft games nowadays always seem to hit a median rating. The kind of game you pick up at Target pre-owned for half off. The kind of game you forget you owned until someone else mentions having it.
two people who worked at Ubisoft left. That was around the time of all the bombings and bad stuff happening in the world, Rainbow Six Vegas 2 was their lead game they were working on AND they threw it away because of the bombings as that truthfully wouldn't be appropriate (really wouldn't.) and simply because those two left the company.
I think once those two left Ubisoft.....Ubisoft died, as that was before Rainbow Six Siege even came out, and every game since I have seen or played by them made me disappointed or sad as I used to love every single game by Ubisoft but now I cannot barely stand the divison, The last update saved it ha, I used to want to break the division in half but mine was digital lol. Siege wasn't that great.. it was fun and could have had more work done on it,
Isn't The division Ubisoft's most recent game? I have played RPG's and I love them, but Division had one heck of a weird RPG feeling. I am praying that this game actually does well, otherwise I am afraid as I think I AM COMPLETELY DONE PURCHASING UBISOFT GAMES... I never thought I would ever hate a game created by them but things change bad things happen.................
+fukoffleavemealone smi I think Ubisoft decided it was gonna be an RPG at the last minute. Yep, ever since Watch Dogs Ubisoft games have been disappointment after disappointment. The concepts of the recent Ubisoft games have been amazing though, but the deliverance has been half assed. Imagine how the games would've turned out if Naughty Dog or Epic Games had developed the games instead.
You seriously need to go back to school and learn what proper grammar is. Also you need to learn the difference between "Medium" and "Median". I can not take you seriously at all, "Ubisoft games nowadays always seem to hit a median rating.". You try and sound smart, but look incredibly uneducated.
median means middle you dumbass go do year 8 maths you fuckwit
+fukoffleavemealone smi what about Watchdogs 2 and For Honor? I think you should pay more attention to what they do with those two games. I don't think wildlands will make it.
It looks interesting, but not full price interesting.
Just because Rockstar does open world so well, everyone else thinks they can pull off an open world game but it's more than just a giant map . People like GTA because of its story driven gameplay, it's just a bonus it's open world.
#WILDLANDSE3
You said it perfectly man.
you sound like you never played gta before
Open world games like Skyrim,Red dead or the mighty Witcher 3 are very very difficult to handle,even skyrim ha dmany problems and issues...also these type of games need time and love from the developers otherwise they end up being crap and repeattive,something i doubt Ubisoft ever does because the only thing they care is money and u can clearly understand that from one particular thing,THE FALSE AVERTISING WITH THE DOWNGRATIONS!
+yaycod That's what an ssd is for.
1 year later the game is an absolute success!
FireFox true! Live it
Ethan Chin I'm actually playing it right now! What a coincidence!!!
FireFox 637 lol same lets add up
You have Xbox bro?
Yep just started playing multiplayer the other day with a few friends and can't put it down.
I absolutely loved this game & it's easily my top 10 best videogames of all time.
This is great troll bait post
This could be Watch Dogs 3, The Division 2... It all looks the same to me... The problem seems to be the culture. These games start off with a good base idea and then they just slap open-world on it as filler content that really doesn't add any value to the game. The long development cycles are just telling of the fact that the project is unorganized and has went through development hell. However, it's not just Ubisoft, it's the industry at large. They have these shareholders who know nothing about video games or have any sense of artistic integrity and who only care about their ROI and quarterly protections. The developers yell "we'll patch it later" and send it off to the printing press. We bitch on the forums and buy the next iteration of half-baked cookies with the crazy idea that this batch will be better than the last lol. We're part of the problem. Stop buying this stuff.
I can agree with you wholeheartedly.
I have noticed that lately many of their games are starting to LOOK and 'feel' like the division.
Are they saving costs by recycling the engine and assets?
Their most recent announcement of games seem to almost not resemble anything like what they should.
"Are they saving costs by recycling the engine and assets?" yes they are, most of the vehicle models in the division where from watch dogs and then used again in watch dogs two and now in this too, many gun models are the same as they where in far cry 3
TheTeamSX
TheTeamSX everyone has their opinion I guess, I have actually enjoyed every ubisoft game I've played, and I have played literally every decent game that has come out so I have alot to compare with, some of you just forgot how back in the day most games were done and over in 8 hours or less..
TheTeamSX I can't see how it's like The Division
2021, I still play this game. I disagree with you my guy.
And by the way, WildlandE3.
@Beaverish Buck Teeth your opinion is automatically invalid when you like your own comment plus clearly you haven't played that game yet
@@bushmanbushinov . _.
@@keylerdanieldelassalasrecu3427 what
This game fucking sucks
I bough the game and for me it's really worth it. I love everything about it!
and do u still play it now??? even tho its been out for a couple of months???
No
how about now? pretty sure you took it to gamestop for a better game. lmao
same i bought it like 4-5 months back and still playing it
Bought it 3 months ago ,, playing the DLCs now
if you love graphics watch a movie, because this game is dope as fuck
Ric Flair and the graphics are actually really good
La Mesa Automotive game unboxing you're joking? Just look at the walls you'll see the shitty poor texture work
Clunky mechanics and the graphics are subpar
I agree. Woooo!!
"It's just a beta" is the shittiest argument ever. I've never played a beta and then seen actual gameplay change since that beta. There are just some minor bugfixes, UI updates and some balancing done after the beta. Sometimes not even that, depending on when the game is releasing. When games make an open beta just 2 weeks before launch, it's not even a beta. It's playable advertising for the game. They should call it "demo" or multiplayer demo" or whatever. It's not a beta.
WildlandE3
This x1,000,000 !
So sick of all these "Don't worry it's only Alpha/Beta" .... it's like these people have never played an Alpha version and then the release version, so naive and makes them look like corporate puppet fanboys who have only been gaming for a month.
Painful.
Beta is literally just an excuse at this point. Every game dev on earth loves to have a beta, that way when people find out about the shitty stuff in their game, people can say, "Its in beta shutup!"
fireapple9 Exactly. That's why the always have a watermark with "alpha footage" or pre-alpha footage". That's an excuse in case their showcase is shit. "Don't worry, it's only alpha. I will change" and then it doesn't change.
I'm going to play devils advocate here and say that Warframe and Subnautica have changed heavily in their beta stage...buuuut this is Ubisoft and I completely agree give us some good graphics and gameplay like the Witcher Series or Star Citizen. WildlandE3?
Pretty much. Betas back in the day used to be actual betas. Now it's a demo.
It is funny how people probably didn't even watch the entire video and started arguing with you and about 10 people are using #WildlandE3
It's exactly why I use the keywords bro. To see who actually took in what I said. Good catch ;)
BigfryTV Well it can help you figure out who has actual arguments instead of random people spewing nonsense, its simple but a really good idea
+dion martin So all game developers should have the level of skill that CD projekt red have, or the shouldn't bother making games? This game and the Witcher3 are entirely different. Witcher3 had open world areas, it wasn't an entirely open world game.
In the end, the graphics looks really good and I am having a blast with random people online.
of course it would be downgraded its ubisoft
only gems of gaming this year is bf1 and skyrim remastered
+Half of the golden circle mafia 3?
Never played it
Never heard of the old ones either
Half of the golden circle look up mafia 3, its not a continuation, its separate like gta
UBISOFT is worst than EA for me.......
Worse* and also I disagree
I don't think EA is nearly as bad as people make them out to be. It's all just bandwagon hate.
+Hijynx87 people kno they make great games (like Ubisoft) but EA has many problems when it comes to micro transactions and fucked up servers, and then Ubisofts problem is with downgrading, although the guy in this vid is just pure stupid, it hasn't been downgraded, no game looks like it's trailer but the gameplay from 2 years ago still looks the same now, no downgrade
They're both as bad as each other to me:
Ubisoft - Bad business practices, unfinished games, poor quality games, insulting gamer's intelligence (30 fps is cinematic lol)
EA- Extremely piss poor business practices, lacklustre games (mirrors edge catalyst/Star Wars battlefront), anti consumer.
+Nathaniel hmmm I can agree with most of that but I do love a lot of Ubisoft's games, like Assassin's Creed 2-black flag, I also liked watch dogs and the crew, oh and far cry series, and from EA I only like battlefield tbh
You know what I think is the funniest thing about this game? You can't snap into cover. But in Resident Evil Umbrella Corps, you can snap to cover, and the enemies don't even use a gun. Umbrella Corps is trash and it even has snap to cover.
#WILDLANDSE3
angry joe Lol
+Dom Gonzalez angry joe?
+Dom Gonzalez angry joe?
I didnt understand the whole open world argument.
Metal Gear 5 was an amazing game lol.
Also 20 -25 hours in a series where the story has never been that long, how is that a flaw?
I know this is an old video, and i love you to death man, but I'd consider giving this game a chance after all this time
@Beaverish Buck Teeth I don’t think using Edgy in what you said makes sense
@Beaverish Buck Teeth I mean, he’s not going against much, lot of people did like wildlands
I would love to focus on the positives of this game, but there is none. The game looks so bad. It's been in development for how so long, and they used it all to make open world. There's no cover mechanics, there's lackluster shooting, there's the awkward camera switch from 3rd to first, there's no positives. There's nothing special about this game. Ubisoft always had problems with open worlds. They need to listen to their fans. It's ridiculous. This is like spending 9 hours working on an essay, and giving 1 body paragraph. It's garbage, and there's no way they can fix this garbage in 7 months. WildlandE3 (Also, just subscribed)
+MegaPenguinBeast like what the division is or what the crew is or what GTA is?
+MegaPenguinBeast heard of mgs five m8
after playing uncharted 4 this game looks like legos
cheap fake legos
so★ dublos :D
so★ well uncharted is pretty much a movie, terrible gameplay but amazing graphics/storyline. It's good as a "movie" not a "game"
SageFox oh this game looks better than uncharted 4?, damn have you ever tried doing standup because your hilarious
when this video was made it was 9 months from release, so its in alpha, please think next time
There is no way that Wildlands will be GOTY when you have Zelda, Horizon: ZD, Mass Effect, Star Citizen and God of War releasing in the same year. No possible way.
William Larsson I'm calling it now, Zelda: Breath of the Wild will be aweful. We've seen next to nothing for it other then very poorly edited screenshots in 2013 and a very, very limited gameplay...if that even was gameplay. It's even widely believed at this point Breath of the Wild won't drop until December of next year, so it will be it's 6th delay. The only two games I can think of that have been delayed this many times are Spore and Duke Nukem: Forever and well...we all know how those turned out
which means cup head and the last guardian might be great disappointments also
"what are you gonna do? collect feathers?" - made my day
With only 15k subs, those "best at" claims aren't deserved just yet.
I like to plan ahead
He just got a sub from me.
With sixteen, you shouldn't be judging...
+Wretched Slippage I agree 99.9 percent of big youtubers are worthless sheep. COD quick scope vids and all that rehashed bs.
16k*
I have been waiting years for this game, and it looks shit. I am hugely disappointed.
It's Ubisoft 😂 same here though
Same here, man.
this footage is pre beta,pre alpha whatever....but it UBISOFT...#FAIL
same... I grew up on ghost recon and they killed it.
What do you expect from Ubisoft.
I must say you brought up good points you earn a sub
Welcome :)
Well Said, My sub as well. I have never played a Ubisoft game yet and may never, but this definitely changed my view on how i see ubisoft games and there play style.
+CuddleCorp Gaming Well, you can play Assassin's Creed 1 and 2, these were good at the time of their release.
CuddleCorp Gaming not all their games are bad I mean ghost recon future soldier was great rainbow six siege is good and depending on what games you like the division is pretty fun with friends
litesaberkunai789 oh well I liked it maybe cause I was so young and I had only good memories
I've recently finished Ghost Recon: Wildlands and in my opinion, I loved the game. I agree with most parts of what you said like that the world is a plain of boringness but the missions just have a different taste to it and that's what kept me going in the game.
"Well my argument to that is.." *..Why do you feel your opinions more valid than anyone else's?*
I don't, but this is my channel, so I'm going to give my opinion without giving a fuck if it pisses anyone off. You guys have the comments section to speak your mind. I have the video.
BigfryTV You've got the video, yeah? Ah, that explains you criticising other people in the comments then. Thats why you *had* to give *your* remark on my passing comment. Us lesser folk don't get that. Not condescending *atall..*
I'm not complaining about your content atall so i dont know where you got that from. It was an opinionated video so yknow.. Why watch if i didnt want to hear?
Its just the way you arse around the comments asif your opinion in some way holds more value than anyone else's.
Dr. Ghoztz So I can't reply to comments on my own channel? Got it.
BigfryTV I didnt say that either? Bahahah
*I think someones a little insecure, christ.* You critique games, can someone not have criticism about you? I enjoyed this video, i simply made comment.
How about "i disagree" instead of "you're wrong" and y'know.. *not* dragging false phrases out of peoples mouth's like an awfully written joke.
I mean, you're further proving my point and I'm not even expecting nor wanting to get a reply.
"Its just the way you arse around the comments asif your opinion in some way holds more value than anyone else's" Explain to me what I say to make you think I believe my opinion holds more weight than yours? Its an opinion...
i feel like this game is going to suck pretty hard
+Nick Wasielewski except Blood Dragons. That gets a pass
Siege still hasn't let me down. It's not Vegas/Vegas 2, but it's still a well made game.
+Chris Topher agreed! I keep going back to Siege after every game I buy. Awesome game.
I hate Siege but the game deserves its honest price and amazing physics technology.
I've been playing these Ghost Recon games since the very first. I know this is going to suck. I will play the alpha and beta but this is not looking good for the franchise at all. Especially since there is no multiplayer. Which is just stupid.
Remember when Ubisoft made good games ? Beyond G&E, Prince of Persia, Splinter Cell...
NujuBIONICLE AC Ezio Trilogy and Far Cry 3
witcher 3....... wait, they didnt make it......
Witcher 3 is overrated.Good story and graphics but that's it,no fun.
NujuBIONICLE even tho siege doesn't have many game modes it's an amazing game with great replayability and graphics. other than that, every ubisoft game I've played recently sucks. I miss splinter cell
FIFAPROZ 21 Nice joke
Man you were so right
Dude everything you said in the video is the truth. People don't like to see the truth but I see it because I played every other ghost recon and ghost recon needs competitive multiplayer without it , it's a one time playthrough ghost recon just like watchdogs and fry cry. Open world games are kinda ruin gameplay creativity something you barely see anymore.......
There's some text errors in my comment. Yeah!
watch dogs had multyplayer it just sucked....
This just makes me wish for an open world socom navy seals game to come out
Is called Arma.
you say ARMA, but im not very good at games like arma / squad / operation flashpoint. however i loved the mercenaries game series and just cause 2. what i want is a less difficult / easy ARMA game, and this looks like it.
rjc0234 I love SQUAD
O Dubb socom is amazing
open world... navy seals... those 2 phrases don't belong in the same sentence
This is going to sell games, no matter how much the concept is far cry and the game play is the division. It's not going to be a 20 hour game. It's going to be 10 hours of quality content and stuffed with repetitive side quests. Again, everyone already knows.
Well said
dead on
spot on comment....wish it wasn't, but, it's ubisoft here
thank you, words right out of my mind bro
sadly there will be more games like this in the future
I'd rather use the money for my Asa Akira fleshlight
HAHAHA
Now theres a wise guy xD
i bought an hour of bridget the midget's services, totally worth it!
300's&350's Ewww XD
Those exist?
I thought this game looked like it would be pretty cool, but after see gameplay, it looks like boring ass Far Cry 4 or something. Metal Gear Solid V made up for the not so interesting open world, with great gameplay and story. Far Cry 3 (unlike 4) had an amazing story to make up for the repetitive gameplay (plus the radio tower climbing in Far Cry 3 seemed so much better than 4 imo). Ubisoft seems like they just throw out the same game with a different title and flashy trailers and then downgrade the graphics and that's absolutely unacceptable.
WILDLANDE3
to be honest Farcry 3 had a shit story. don't get me wrong I loved Farcry 3, it sits in my top 10 games list. I think when Ubisoft finds a game style (e.g. open world, climbing towers to unlock the map, Bases scatted across the map to liberate.) that is very profitable they quickly make more and more games in that style to make even more profit.
I agree. Same thing with Assassins Creed. Loved the way the story was going throughout the first few games and then they convoluted the shit out of it and made it way more confusing than it had to be. They then gave us gimmicky shit like sailing in boats....
I personally see black flag (if that is what you mean) as a pretty good game, i love the fact it combines swashbuckling battles and parkour, I think the voice acting and story are pretty good too. But the latest AC's are a bit frustrating with their poorly optimized gameplay and lack luster stealth, gameplay, etc.
Absolutely "unacceptable"? Says who? You? I enjoyed far cry 4 immensely and thought it told a way better story than far cry 3. As for MGS 5? Mgs 5 is a far cry rip off in first person and has an abysmal story too, not even worthy of metal gears name
I'd much rather play Rainbow Six Patriots
Shiiiit, and that was 4 years ago, and I was actually hyped for that. A shame the formula had to change.
Such a shame to see such a promising game get turned into a online multiplayer shooter. If you go to the comments section, its a little disheartening to see how many people say that it looked like trash
Yea true
Owen Bunny It feels like R6S was a concept Tom Clancy thought up, as well as The Division. Like they weren't something Clancy wrote about in a book, but instead made a list of things he thought the country whould do if the situation arises. Speaking as if the country were to be under actual grave danger of biological and infrastructural attack, The Division could be made to counter it, or if terrorism were to become so covert as in R6S, a real counter-terror team of a mix of the best operatives from around the world would step in. Clancy's usual works, such as early Ghost Recon, were military sci-fi, but these feel more like simple "what ifs" that they had him think up, and they ran with it.
***** a security agent (privaty army) belonging to the prisident.
Honestly it's kind of funny to see how many people are saying you shouldn't judge a game before it comes out, even though most of the people saying that are probably the same people who also contributed to the 3 million dislikes on the Infinite warfare campaign trailer and the bandwagon of hate that was placed on the game BEFORE it came out.
It's like, you can judge all you want about how good something is going to be and preorder the shit out of it, but the moment someone says "nar this doesn't look up to scratch with a lot of other releases," you're being unfair ??????? wassup with that my dudes
ItzStayTrill thats one of the reason pre orders are bad and just going to make some dev greedy.People need to pressure developers into making a good game instead of pre ordering it because it looks cool in the trailers but then the actual product sucks.
finaldestiny17 lol CoD. It's dying. It's basically titanfall without the mechs now.
The single player is good but the multiplayer is beyond shit tbh
One of my favourite games this gen
@Beaverish Buck Teeth did you know its OK to have different opinions
@@tushigaming576 and yours is wrong
@@lucascapelao how
Got a new sub for your no bullshit assessments 👍
+Gar Murdoch Welcome to the channel! New video dropping in 5!
lmao when you complain about bugs in a game that hasnt been released.
ya you got me as a sub as well for saying it how it is(as of now) wildlandsE3
Gar Murdoch oh geez go cry over sponsored videos
+BigfryTV u have Some good points here and there sub earnd
Spot on, most people can't see the lack of effort ubisoft really puts into their new games and the countless insulting, in your face downgrades. WildlandE3
Every Ubisoft game has borrowed mechanics from their other IPs to the point that when you've played one you've played them all. The only game that hasn't fallen to this is Splinter Cell and I think part of that is because it is still linear.
I've been playing the beta, it's pretty fun. It's a nice coop military freeroam shooter. it's like farcry meets GTA meets the Division
"It's gonna be like a 20 to 25 hour game"
Damn you Ubisoft. That looks like freakin ps2
Nick Guardiola looks like a dope game
Andreas Scott Oh alright good to know!
Dubious Jay I hope so man. Ubisoft ruined the division and assasins creed and watch dogs for me so hoping they get this one right
Nick Guardiola I wish you well and sincerely hope you don't hold your breath for that.
Chris Pritchard for watch dogs?
the sad reality is that companies like ubisoft who dont give a f@ck about community and actual players earn so much money!... the sad reality is that people like piewwhateverpie make so much money and he is not even funny or something... but thats the word we live in
preach of the day
Capitalism...
pewdiepie is very entertaining to watch if u've watched him for awhile, although he can scream like a child at times, he is funny as hell to some people, other people hate him because they dont find him funny and that he's the biggest youtuber. but u're right about ubisoft.
Nobody is forced to play Ubisoft games. Nobody is forced to watch Pewdiepie. Under capitalism you have the freedom of choice because of the free market. Is your alternative state mandated entertainment where Ubisoft is the only game developer?
the sad reality is that you're saying bullshit
I'm gonna save myself £54-70
An you are completely right the game is piss poor overhyped piece of shit an if they had a multiplayer depending on how that is I would be willing to pay at most £1 for the game
Liam Leckey it's only 40ish quid bro. U can still get it and have 14-30 quid
Liam Leckey good don't buy this trash
Liam Leckey Kaayyz likes I care you would sparez those moneys kayyyy?
Max Mayer agreed
In the motorcycle part when he goes in 1st person he's still walking
This is probably going to be Ubi's next downgrade. Nothing to suggest otherwise. Ubi is worse than EA now. Terrible.
...but yea this rant is annoying, you have nothing to say after like 2 minutes.
Woah woah... Worse than EA? now I'm not saying your wrong but that's a stretch. But I agree they both suck. RIP Ghost Recon. RIP Battlefield 1😔
Rockstar and Bethesda are still solid :)
Really? ESO?
+hamelzz Rock star =10/10
Bethesda = 8/10
WildlandE3
I don't find most Ubisoft games boring, the Far cry series was pretty entertaining but I am getting a very MGS V vibe from this game. I honestly wouldn't mind if it was like a Far cry/ Mgs V mash up though I'm not sure many would agree
Ya it looks very MGS 5 with a big empty map with weaker aiming mechanics and no comedy value
far cry is fun. I don't want every other game to be just like far cry though. or they all get boring.
Far cry has some really good story lines, but I don't think Wildland will focus on the story line just like division didn't
Sal ty WHO the Fuck likes far cry anymore, the first one was good, the second was unique, the third and forth were the same but still Shit. primal is basically the past equivalent game of infinite warfare
Though MGS 5 has the same zoom in did you notice that when they go into first person with there gun it has that same filling as MGS 5 does
WILDLANDE3! I was hyped to see the gameplay at E3. I was left bitterly disappointed. Total bollocks. Will not be touching this game. I was astounded to see a lot of RUclipsrs talking about it afterwards in a positive light, and fueling the hype train. I'm like "did you just watch the same fucking shit that I did?"... I appreciate the honesty on this channel. Subbed
+SkittleBuk1 welcome to the channel man!
A lot of RUclipsrs get paid to promote stuff.
WILDLANDE3: thanks. That's exactly what I was thinking.
+Gustav Mix same here looks all the same 2 me
And I just love people like you that hasn't even played the actual game and starts bashing it.
RUclips: hey this video is from 5 years ago and he hasn't looked at ghost recon stuff in ages so why is there any reason to recommend this?
RUclips: wait... I'm RUclips fuck it here you go
Ubisoft is really going down hill. this is pissing me off!!! This is the company that made fuckin AC2 and Brotherhood. And this looks like shit. I paid 60 bucks for the division and it was decent but still shit.
C'mon Ubisoft you downgraded Watchdogs, Siege, and the Division. besides unity was shit and syndicate was just made to say, "sorry for releasing a shitty game".
Looks like the only thing to look forward to is BF1.
still ubisoft have good projects, for honor and south park looks awesome
lmao, and that game isn't even by ubisoft
check out mount and blade 2.
+JRpainX no
AC 2 is boring
I find that all Ubi games have that washed out empty feel.
Agreed. It always feels like there wasn't any love put into their games. everything feels so empty and lifeless in ubi games.
WHATSaDavid R6 is one of the best NEXT GEN games I've played.
You're kidding. R6 was massive disappointment. Talk about repetitive gameplay. $80 for one game mode and no single player.
WHATSaDavid Gotta disagree with you there. Siege is quite honestly one of the best Ubisoft games released in the past few years. I've been playing it since release, and I'm still finding new tactics and strategies on every map. Its also one of the most teamwork oriented games I've ever played as well. I think its alright that there is no singeplayer, as the multiplayer can offer thousands of hours of gameplay.
got to agree with T VB. it seem repetitive but the games are so different even if your playing the same map and mode. there are so many ways and strategies, it's really fun.
Judging by the gameplay video, compared to the previous title like ghost recon future soldier, the animation and the recoil and other stuff just feels really off, the camera movement feels looks really choppy, the movement looks really choppy, the animation looks really choppy, etc....i mean yea there will be a lot of people bashing on this opinion who says "you haven't played the game, shut the fuck up until you buy it and play the game" yea i wouldn't want to play the game if just by looking at the gameplay which is the first impression makes me doesn't want to play the game in the first place, it's just how it works, people, the marketing team gave us something to judge to convince us to go and buy the game and it failed.
But i really hope they fix these issues, but with today's situation of gaming industry, i really have low expectations for it, which a really big shame because this game has a HUGE potential of being a great fucking game
Usually the first things they polish up before release is animation, vfx, and generally how it looks, so it will probably be way cleaner with the 60fps standards of most next gen compatible games when it's ready for more than just a demo.
Running it on a PS4 in 4K with hdr on a 60" Samsung is the best graphics I've ever seen.
Ps copied xbox one 4K
Cdhall18 xbox copied ps
bence 70170 Xbox could play 4k before ps
MememanRyan Xbox had 4k before ps is all i was trying to say.
You're using the PS4 pro, it's not 4k(the game), just sayin.
I love his argument about the 3rd and 1st person motorcycle. Like, the guy was moving the whole time so after shooting and switching views (while moving) he is going to be closer.
Also, the E3 gameplay for The Division was extremely different from what we got on the release date. Comparing this to the beta when the video your talking about is E3 gameplay doesn't make sense. The beta for The Division was pretty accurate to the game at release. The part I agree on is that something does look off about the gameplay. Idk what though. Wildlands E3.
Watch the Division gameplay from 2013 and compare it to now. THEN you'll see why everyones mad.
+Matt Baldwin I do see why people are mad. In Wildlands the graphics don't look too great, so in my opinion it can't get worse and I'm glad the gameplay is not misleading, unlike The Division.
dont get the facts let in the way of some good circlejerk
Yes but not 15 feet closer, and it was clearly edited like he said, it doesn't flow like it should
Tom Clancy didn't die for this.
This looks like it would have been awesome if it was a game that released in 2007.
it certainly could have been released same time as GTA5
hahaha
at least loose clothing moves unlike battlefield 4
agree xD
no console back in 2007 would run this game heck if that was true gta 5 would have been bigger and gta 4 you people think that old shot is better
AS A SOLDIER THIS GAME HAS BEEN A BLAST:)
This looks like Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter. Wtf is this. Complete downgrade from the previous released gameplay like every single game we get now.
Every game Ubisoft releases is a downgrade from Whenit was revealed
Yes ghost recon wild lands seems bad and everyone says Ubisoft sucks, but my faveorite ubi game was Ghost Recon Future Soldier.
+Jon Gass GR:FS was pretty great, but the multiplayer was a bit rage inducing at times since the cover and CQC system wasn't that fluid. If that was a title released today with constant updates adding more and more guns and maps and modes procedurally, it would be right below GR:AW In my favouritism.
+AHS Valor (Val) yeah graw was awesome man. If only they could release the 2 graw's and future soldier so that way I can get that 3 pack thing and play them all. If GRFS was out now honestly I'd play it more than wildlands
More like future soldier..witch looked pretty good back in 2012 i think...but this shit...
For multiplayer I think they should include a mode where the Ghosts fight against the Drug Cartel in claiming the drugs during a certain period of time. They have to defend the cargo and they also have vehicles. Meanwhile, the Ghosts have to use tactics to prevent it from getting to the destination. Or you could also do a Ghost that went rouge and other Ghosts have to find him or her.
Also it was a great video.
If it took them 7 years to make what you just saw do you really think they can do anything except seal their fates in the next 7 months
god man, what are you, the developer?
WildlandE3
I think you might be right. All that means to me is dont buy it on release day and don't preorder. Wait for the right moment after there has been some real gameplay to look at.
Helder Perez smart thinking I just moved my pre order to zero horizon I'll just wait until it's 35$
yeah I will probably wait for a discount too
Helder Perez Aah fuck it! Buying the Collectors Edition! *gives money to uplay store* and now *waits*
The game was good for the first 3 bosses. Then, once you're used to the mechanics, everything felt like chores.
The COD franchise and Ubisoft need a wake up call. Both have gone to utter and complete shit.
Watch Dogs 2 is great
Call of duty and Ubisoft games need to take a page out of battlefield 1/battlefront's play book and get a fucking engine that looks new gen. All this gens cod and ubisoft games, look like they could be running on a overclocked ps3. No excuse anymore that cod wants the game running in 60fps, so they take a hit on graphics. Look at what frostbite does. Cod is rinse, repeat shit at this point. Get a new fucking engine, 3 studios, w/ 2 years in between cods now and they still look like trash.....lazy fucks. Dishonored 2 is another that looks like blocky shit, with zero animations and ps3 physics. No excuse for ps3 grafix this point......bring on ps5 or gtfo
I'd rather use that money for Red Dead Redemption 2.
an another multiplayer focused Rockstar Game?
no thanks. fake GTAV Second Life edition was enough for me...
yea but difference is RDR2 will be good. And if somehow it isnt, it sure will look good unlike this game
Dru Blanks
their obvious CGI trailer really showed us how good the graphics are!.... ops...
and do not get me wrong, Red Dead Redemption is done by the GOOD rockstar developers, the people who created the RAGEngine and use it in the best way possible...
but the trailer was obvious CGI...
woah woah, the game isnt even out yet..
jamez
The thing is, Read Dead Redemption Two isn't coming out until late next year, that is around 8 months apart.
I'm going to solve everyone's problem with this game.... Just don't buy it when it releases
Wildlande3
Thank you!
Not only should they not buy it at release, they should also wait until the honey moon phase is over.
thumbs up for this advice 👍
Pretty much my plan. Who the fuck keeps buying these no-effort copy and paste ubisoft games? How is this company still making money when they shit out bland, empty open world games with no content?
Fucking love this game
the real issue for me is how arcade like its going to be
if i have to shoot half a clip to someones chest to kill him , this game goes directly to "ahhh i'll play it when i have nothing else to do"
Pele sch exactly, don't get me wrong it doesn't bug me a whole lot but i hate games where you have to shoot enemies in the head twice to kill them. Granted idk if it's this game but still
Clever Name
I liked rainbow six just for that reason. One shot, one kill or almost. One error and you're down: tactics and planning were fundamental. Good times. I also think it's not fun to kill brainless thugs, it's easy. I wonder why they never worked on high AI for the enemies, that for example are supposed to be in radio contact and should react even if you kill in perfect silence. Things like the one I mentioned, smart bastards to kill, not open world but reactive world!
rainbow six seige is repetitive af all u do is breach and kill and its all inside its so boring
THENOTOFFICIALMLGPAGE well, you're right, but hey it's a first person shooter, what do you expect? The game is supposed to be a "go in and take them all down" type of game. But player's decision were fundamental, along with the ability to respond to unexpected situations with smart moves. The same way to go in a room could be wrong in the next mission, depending on the weapons employed, the enemy's numbers and tactics and so on. I enjoyed it. In Athena's sword there were a lot of open-space actions too and those missions needed a fairly high amount of strategy to finish the mission with no casualties.
Actually, fuck this. Why can't Ghost Recon go back to how it was on THE FIRST GAME? Since the sequels started I just stopped giving a shit about them. The first one was just nearly perfect, big-ass maps where you can aproach your objective from different directions, perfect for Coop, long singleplayer story, cheap expansions... And now instead we get this shit. And a few years ago, Ubisoft made Ghost Recon F2P, which sucked infinite balls. Seriously, why don't they just kill the franchise anyway, not like they haven't killed Prince of Persia, Beyond Good and Evil or Rayman (which took them years to revive) before.
I second you- If some were to remake the original Ghost Recon as a new game, with modern graphics, while still keeping the original gameplay, I would buy it right away- it's been over 15 years now, so F it, I'm re-creating the GR campaigns myself in the Arma 3 Engine for the past few weeks.
jarrad 96 I got them all on Steam for like 1€ because the old CD's were just DEAD and I couldn't install the game anymore, and I still think it's better than all Ubisoft titles we have gotten these last years.
Your only description of GR1, was a description that matches this game. Minus expansions that are cheap.
SleepyGuyy That game had a rather realistic gameplay and lots of planning. This game does not have any of that. Also, that game was NOT open world, it had huge maps for the time, but not open world. This game has it because every game seems to need it these damn days.
+BadassFreeman idk looks pretty decent because it
It just seems like a worse version of mgs V.
I commented this before I heard him say it in the vid.
Probably seeing as this is owned by Ubisoft where as MGS has KOJIMA, KOJIMA developing it not really much competition there at all.
Isnt mgs V allready shity version? How much shitier can it get? Both games suck.
WILDLAND E3 ---- The gaming industry is conning us all. Pre-orders are part of this. at one time developers used guys to test games before release you use to get game demos in magazine developers wasn't scared to show their games. Now they hide the game development it comes out you pre-order it before release and the company doesn't have to worry about the game not being finished because so many still buy the game and accept garbage. with microtransactions and dlc. games didnt use to have dlc. you use to get a full game on release. dlc is just a money maker they build the game then cut out levels. and now games come out unfinished. i can't believe what direction the gaming industry is going. its dying. greedy companies are ruining gaming. and that's the truth. if we didnt buy pre-orders and hold money in your wallet until you get a full game. these companies are not putting any love into games. not all developers but some EA. Bethesda going downhill. Bungie. and look at anthem. and fallout 76. and more. fanboys have no idea whats going on with games. they will accept anything. pisses me off. am fed up with the way games are these days. and dont even mention Ubisoft. fuk.
Where I am with this game:
World 9/10 - Breathtaking
Gameplay 2/10 - Worst in Series
Right?!!
Well I think the tech has come on a bit here (actually this area shown in the demo is one of the worst looking). A bit. An alarmingly tiny 'bit' from lat-gen titles like RDR or even Operation Flashpoint.
+SatelliteGone gta online still looks better than this.
Yep. Spot on. Red Dead and GTA V both look a hell of a lot better than this game. At first i thought "Oh, it's Alpha, plenty of time to fix" but after watching the vid it made me realise that actually they really haven't got that long to fix it so it's unlikely to to change.
Respect your opinion but i still love the game can't wait to get it!
Lowkey how do you love something that's not even out..
Love the look of it i meant and love the gameplay
Lowkey sameeeeeeee
Lowkey same here people won't like it because it won't be a run and gun type shooter I'm gunna play it a bit tactical lol
why don't you guys play Arma 3 instead?
if you want to play open world, play skyrim or gta, this game is is gonna be such a flop. such a waste
Or the Witcher 3 ;p
Fallout
+Luke Weliever Older Fallouts
Any fallout
I'll play far cry 4
This is when you tubers get so entitled to their opinion that they spend their review trying to defend their opinions instead of taking an unbiased approach.
Your comment is insignificant that your opinion does not matter lol
Yeah. Damn kids.
Wow like we didn't know the downgrade was coming, this is Ubisoft
Ubishit*
Jay G Ubuysoft*
Jay G # Ubisofts life's matter
Vash Baldeus #ubi feelings
Just played the beta what a bag of shit game
Lol gotta love the kids in here all salty because the game don't look that good and someone is speaking up about it.
Aapeli Hölttä well most people are just sad that everyone judges the game mostly based on grapichs
True but graphics aside, the game looked clunky. Also the thing is that, atleast personally I don't care about graphics that much, but when game looks amazing in trailers and descent in reality it's kinda disappointing
Aapeli Hölttä well that is everygame i mean i'm not to hyped myself but everyone deserves a nes chance. everyone hate on ubisoft even though they are multiple different divisions
Aapeli Hölttä yea but what the fuck. fuck this fuck that ...thays all this guy knows how to say.
If you don't care about graphics, and just Gameplay and Performance, like myself, the game looks like a fucking great game, And your statement about kids being salty is really quite dull and nonsensical, kids play COD, BF, and shit like that. They don't play "Realistic" Open World Military Shooters. The game looks great, graphic Whores are the salty ones here...
Bigfry talks truth, subscribed.
Welcome bro!
I loved Ghost Recon, now I'm scared. You were hoping for competitive multiplayer so the game can hold up to the flaws, and I hoped for local couch co-op for me and my best friend to play the campaign. Ubisoft is fucked now, they did the downgrading even before Watch Dogs, they did it on Farcry 3 and I think that is when it started, they think they can be lazy and sneaky and lying to their players and they can't do that. Rainbow Six Vegas 2 was my favorite game, 7 years later, they fucking ruined the entire franchise, and I hope they don't do it to Ghost Recon, I'm going to wait a couple days to a week and wait to see gameplay and reviews at launch and I'll buy the game if Ubisoft doesn't lie to us again. I can give many more examples of their false advertisements and criminal acts to gamers. Tom Clancy would be disappointed if he were still alive. Thanks Bigfry, you opened my eyes and I thank you for it.
Hey man. I'm just glad if I can save people some money in the long run. If you really want it, try to pick it up discounted on G2A or something.
Alright, thanks, man. I only just subscribed and already you are making an effect on me and other gamers, I just hope people open their eyes and listen. Thanks again.
+BigfryTV thank you man...really thank you...you made me open my eyes on these mother fuckers games...I and my friends...
@BigfryTV, Are you playing on PC or console? I would imagine the trailer was shot in a higher resolution, so perhaps playing the game in 4K will be the same.
10 minutes of hilarious truth :D
YAY FOR THRUTH!
Sorry for making this huge mistake and ruining your life ^^
fr
you have so fucking right
are you salty he brought up a bunch of valid points? The game looks like a disasters after E3 conference
UBISSOFT is the Great Value of Game studios
How dare you insult Great Value like that.... their cling wrap and toilet paper is top tier as fuck.
+Yardie Noh 😂 you must work for Great Value
+Assassin's Creed Syndicate
Except its the same price as a Bethesda and rockstar game....
+Dave Smith I know why is every new game 60$. the only ones worth that are like sky rim. overwatch's graphics are garbage and only has multi player its defiantly not worth 60$ but it costs that much anyway
Finally someone talked about the shitty movement. Grand Theft Auto and The Division had good movement, and it didn't feel like you were just gliding around, it felt like you had real weight.
#wildlande3
But this moves just like the division.............
Grand Theft Auto has great movement? Wtf have you even tried to make a jump or walk across a thin line in that game with any amount of accuracy? Sure it looks realistic, but it takes away some control from the player to achieve that.
Are you literally daft? GTA had fantastic movement because they use the endorphin engine. Feels better than this on the rails bull.
+Ghost Nappa no it doesn't, this glides along like a tank on ice. The Division you feel every footstep.
I think it's a lot of fun just sneaking and working out a problem looking for an exfill closest to you under heavy fire. The coordination that can be used is actually crucial. Only an opinion
wildlande3 The flying, skydiving, and parachuting looks like good mechanic "i think" but that's about it. I agree it looks boring as hell compared to how much there is to do in GTA 5 even it's an old game. I would pick that over wild lands for an open world game with missions. With the ceo/vip/mc aspect they have now there is so much to do. i in general don't like ubisoft, they don't do anything with games after they are released to make them better if they suck from the get go
driving is pretty good as well
Kragon & Rodawg I agree just look at what happened with Assassin's creed Unity, they made an apology video and gave everyone who bought the game free Dlc and a free new game cause it ducked and was bugged all to hell. Ubisoft needs to take a few years off from developing any video game and refresh themselves.
BrokeWar And have you even played Rainbow Six recently? It has improved detrimentally and will continue for another year.
It is a shame what happened to Ghost Recon and Rainbow Six. They aren't the great tactical games they used to be. This game isn't Ghost Recon, it has nothing to do with what Ghost Recon was ugh. But try to tell that to the mainstream players who will hunt you down for saying something bad about their favorite Publisher, thinking they need to defend a corporation who doesn't give a damn about them nor their IP's, just wanna cash in while they can.
This game might be fun, i don't know, haven't played it. But as a fan of Tactical games, the Ghost Recon name has become a slap in the face, reminding me of how tactical fans made the IP big just to see it being taken away to please people who already have a thousand other games too chose from being pleased. Just like Rainbow six...i miss the old day's when we were tested as gamers, instead of all this action driven fast paced shooter stuff.
I actually really like Rainbow Six Siege and think thatit doespreserve thetactical combat style of play but this game does look like a bit of a disappointment so far, things could change but then again they also might not for Wildlands. I hope they do because I've always loved Tom Clancy games
Give me a retextured Rainbow Six 3 and Ghost Recon 1 with dedicated servers and maybe more guns and Ubisoft cam have my money again.
sad reality is that the tacticle shooter fan base is very small... There is a reason so many casual games are coming out and becoming huge (overwatch) and not many tacticle games are(escape tarkov and arma 3) ubisoft is being bought out and they need anything to make them more popular and more money and that is what this game is... would I prefer an arma 3 like wildlands? yeah, but we are a micro group compared to the massive casual community...
If you're talking about the REAL Rainbow Six 3:Raven Shield from the PC, then I agree. If you mean the horrendously watered-down console R63, then pass...
Rainbow six awesome, best tactical fps out in my opinion.
In 2016 if you think what you see in ubisoft trailers is actually going to represent the final product you are sadly mistaken!
I bought this game a few days ago and have around 24 hours played so far. In my opinion, this game is a lot of fun! This video is irrelevant right now because it came out 7 months before releasing, but there is a lot in the video that just didn't really hit the predictions it made. The graphics are beautiful (If you're playing on PC) and in my head a console player is not in the position to talk shit about graphics. For one reason.. consoles have downgraded graphics because it sacrifices just that to get a steady 30/60 fps depending on the console and the game. (I don't really know what FPS consoles gets on this particular game, so I'm not the one to speak here) Wildlands is also a great game to play with a few friends if you're into stealth, because it's really important to cooperate in order to take out or go through a town or base unnoticed. I can agree that the story missions do get a little repetetive, but I don't really mind that because the gameplay kind of makes up for it, in my opinion. If you do get tired of all the story missions, a great thing to do is to find intel on the whereabouts of new weapons and weapon equipment around the map. It's just a fun and exciting thing to do.
The switch from third to first person when aiming is not that bad anymore, but if you don't like it, you can change to over the shoulder aiming which is great.
Driving is still pretty shit, not gonna lie.
The open-world is really beautiful and it's just big enough to keep you entertained for quite a few hours when exploring.
All in all, I would say that it's worth buying if you're into these kinds of cooperative stealth games. Not only stealth but military shooters all around.
And before someone feels like calling me a "Ubisoft fanboy" I would just like to say that I never really cared for Ubisoft because they are money hungry, cashgrabbing, douchebags which never really seem to get any game right.
But this game is fine.. really. (:
This text is just a flow of bullshit to excuse for this pile of shit Ubisoft pushed out of their ass.
Ubisoft quality right there
wildland e3
Ac Unity, AC Syndicate, AC Chronicles Trilogy, The Division, Rainbow Six, Watch Dogs, Far Cry Primal, I don't get it, all these games aren't enough to snap people out of whatever charm or spell Ubisoft has them under, I just don't fucking get it.
Steep and For Honor looked so cool at their reveals, now For Honor is starting to look less and less interesting the more they show, like The Division did and Steep looks like it's probably going to get old fast when all you can do in an open world is race, but I'll just wait until they show more footage.
Ghost Recon is just going to be another disappointment, all the warning signs are starting to show. I hope ubisoft proves me very wrong when this comes out but they've disappointed me on that as well, multiple times.
I can't speak for the other games but I didn't find watchdogs or R6 that bad. I got watchdogs a few months after it came out for dirt cheap and can say it was worth the playthrough and just got the R6 starter edition and have been no lifeing it for the past week and has become my new favorite competitive game.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but Rainbow Six Siege is not a shitty game. It's mechanics are new and innovative, doing something that's never been done before in a multiplayer fps. The graphics did face a downgrade (as expected) overall they aren't the best, but they are still acceptable.
+Richard Joseph I know, the graphics don't matter as long as the gameplay is solid which it is
The division has awesome graphics and gameplay. Maybe you need your eyes checked?
Wildlands doesn't even look like the same engine as the division, figured they would have built from that?
+79masshole "The division has awesome graphics and gameplay" Are you fucking blind? Lol
I think this game will be great as long as they fix the crappy 3rd to 1st person switch.
Gabe Grant really that's your only concern
well yeah, I love games like Far Cry so I'm not concerned about the post game stuff. That is all I'm really worried about.
Gabe Grant WTF....
Gabe grant I also love far cry like really, but this gameplay is just not good
How much storage does this game need for installation??? I might get it on Xbox
Why don't people open their eyes and realie ALL of Ubisoft games in the past 5-8 years have just been getting more and more half assed then ever before. Future Soldier was a good game, wasn't super amazing, but it was good. Why couldn't they of just went with a second one of that? Open world games are so fucking bad these days I truly don't care about them unless they're coming from a select few of developers!
If anybody remembers Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction, then just remember that game will still be better and funner to play then this fucking game!
Gta v and witcher 3 are both excelent open world games. I would even say that witcher 3 is the best game ever made.
Valiant hearts is really good ubisoft game btw.
Well...I liked Watch Dogs & Far Cry 3. :(
The Far Cry games were good and the last Assassin's creed game was really good but underperformed financially
The best Ubisoft games are the ones where they try something different. Whether that be a big production like Rainbow Six: Siege or small experiments like Grow Home.
I cant belive people hype anything related to ubisoft after the last AC and The Division! Wildlande3
I was done with Ubisoft after AC: Revelations, GR:FS and FC3. Everything after that screams that the company fell. I still love Tom Clancy and his fiction, and enough so to wish some other company took up making these games.
yeah, me too victor
Whats wrong FC 3?
And whats wrong with AC.
Stanley Sims The series is taking a total dive and is losing the glory it achieved with the originals in the series.
When you see McDonalds's adverts and what you actually get.
Yes! On Ads I see a nice, neat burger, then I get it and the beef is half out!😂
P3T3_V GAMING but people still buy it shit I still buy their 20 piece nuggets lol an their good asf 😂
A bit of a longshot, but still.. anyone knows what is the song title from the intro part?