Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
The Reformers: John Huss
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
- This message covers the life and impact of John Huss (Jan Hus), and why there was a need for church reform. Huss is known for insisting that the Bible and God should have authority in all matters of the faith, and we'll explore why it's important for us as Christians to focus on following Jesus.
From the series "The Reformers." Preached by pastor Tim Amor at both Beatrice Mennonite Church and First Mennonite Church on October 8, 2017.
![EST Gee - NEVER NEED (Feat. Selfpaid Savage) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f2cRtr52HXI/mqdefault.jpg)
I love this presentation, this is good stuff please i'll need these notes so that i study more..
Thank you for this Great lesson & hope many more Christians & non-Christians listen & know this true & blessing history lesson. May it bless & use us for the sinful world 🤲🙏!!
The world is complicated and we must gratefully try to learn bible each day
The early Church in the book of Acts and church epistles, was led by a plurality of Elders in every city not just one man over an entire city. The practice of putting one man over an entire city is the beginning of error that led to the ultimate error of the Roman Catholic Church
Well done video
Thanks for watching & for the encouragement!
We dont follow the Bible, we read the Bible so we can follow JESUS!!
💯!!!
This was a fantastic lecture.
Thank you for your kind words!
~Tim
Very insightful biblical history lesson. Keep following the Holy Spirit! Thank you and God bless!
Thank you for watching and taking the time to post your kind, encouraging comments!
...EXCELLENT material! Big - BIG! - thanks for that!
Thanks for watching and for the encouraging comment!
The best boy-band.
Fantastic. Thank you.
This is interesting to learn and understand,what comes thereafter is personal judgement
Thank you for a simple to understand quick lesson on religious history. A really interesting topic would also be on how the Sabbath was ultimately thought of being on the first day (Sunday) instead of the seventh day, like it says in the fourth Commandment?
🙏🏽💙💜❤️😊
Justin Martyr talk about in his First Apology to Rome talked about how believers gathered on Sunday. As the day he rose. Hebrew roots is tricky..
God bless you
Though a century earlier, Huss' treatment by the Church mimics Luther's experiences. Excluding, of course, actually being burned alive! Luther was threatened with treason but was excommunicated instead. Luther must have been well versed in Huss' teachings? Being raised Lutheran we were fervently taught about Luther. Huss though, not so much. Thanks for the video! I'm likely to read more about Huss because you shared it with us.
I'm glad you liked it. Thanks for taking the time to share your encouraging comments!
Wow, Thanks for posting this. So useful and clear :)
Thanks , Diana, for your encouraging words!
Great lecture, you make it interesting and clear. Liked and subscribed. Following from Montreal Canada
Bonjour, mon ami! Montréal is a beautiful city! Thank you for your kind words & for taking the time to encourage me like this!
So helpful thank you
Glad it was helpful!
~Tim
Video makes same error as Martin Luther. Saying bible is for us to follow Jesus rather than know and obey God as John 17:2-3 says.
Yes, but I would say the only way to really obey God is to know Jesus and be filled by the Holy Spirit. Following Jesus will look exactly like obeying God - like loving God and loving our neighbors.
Just an FYI. , indulgences are not the forgiveness of sins. It is the lessening of time in purgatory.
I think that’s also true... but the sources I read on indulgences typically have it listed as a bit of a formula:
Time in purgatory is reduced/lessened because certain sins have been forgiven. It is in having those sins forgiven/indulged that the time in purgatory is then reduced.
So really it’s both a forgiveness of sins and a reduction in the time one spends in purgatory. A both/and scenario.
Thank you for the fascinating lecture about history of my state! Anyway :) Hus is pronounced just as Hus (more like Hoos but short syllable), not Has (but I guess someone told you already)
Of course I know the basic stories from school, but I am way curious what foreign sources tell and how they interpret this piece of history..
Thank you very much for watching the video and for your encouraging comments!
And thanks for the helpful advice on how to properly pronounce Jan Hus' name! I chose to anglicize Jan Hus into John Huss just to make things easier for people here in rural Nebraska, but I've heard his name said a few different ways, and I was never certain which way was the most correct.
cool, I thank for your replay actually, it's great that people hear about this historical (and religious) issue so far from Europe, no matter how names are pronounced
Naomba ya kiswahili
0:38 in Czech, the ”u“ in ”Hus“ is pronounced like the English ”oo“ in ”look“. Hello from Czechia
Thanks for that, and for watching!
My mother's family is originally from Czechoslovakia, and while that's her first language, it takes her a bit to get it back. I opted to go with the anglicized version of "Huss" when I did this message, but now I try to say it more correctly.
@@PastorAmor interesting
18:17 is it here that Huss denied transubstantiation? I thought that was the underlying reason the king's support was withdrawn.
This is a great question, thanks for asking, Renee!
I no longer have my "long notes" which would let me be more specific to this question and give exact sources for my answer... Huss obviously became against the doctrine of transubstantiation, but I think it's unfair to tie the support of the king to anything theological.
There was a lot of political intrigue mixed with religion, and I think things are far too complicated in history for a simplistic answer (e.g. Huss denied transubstantiation, ergo the king withdrew his support).
While not all kings and rulers etc were motivated simply by politics and maintaining power, it seems that King Wencelaus IV was a bit of a schemer and was more interested in gaining power than actual theological or faith related concerns (from what I recall, at least). Wencelaus' support of Huss was always more about what Huss' message could do for Wencelaus, than about whether Huss' assertions were actually true.
This video is an edited down version of my message, which originally included a section dedicated to the Papal Schism (and how we ended up with 3 Popes for a while), but I took that out since it seemed less important to the overall message. But I think the mess of the Schism probably explains more why Wencelaus dropped his support of Huss.
For further reading, I always recommend both volumes of "The Story of Christianity" by Justo L. Gonzalez. While I used a variety of other sources (including notes from classes), I found the chapter on Jan Hus from "The Great Medieval Heretics" by Michael Frassetto to be particularly helpful.
John the XXIII was the Pope for Vatican II in the 1969’s. Not during Huss’ time.
John the XXIII was recognized as Pope from 1410-1415 during the Western Schism. It was only in 1958 that he was no longer considered a “real” or “legit” Pope.
You are correct that Pope John the XXIII (Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli) served as Pope from 1958-63, which would include the beginning of the Second Vatican Council.
Fun fact: I have a friend/acquaintance from my time in Buffalo, NY who actually attended Vatican II! Her stories were amazing - especially since I love Church history.
Thanks for watching and taking the time to respond by the way!
Here’s an easy list of Popes with dates and important events etc if you’re interested:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_popes
i love moravians and mennonites since i am a baptist and so the anabaptist of the past the single best argument against any religion is its history , humane or grisly, kind or gruesome , meek or gory you have idealized constantine because you failed in this otherwise fine video to do the research
Thanks for your comment - I'm a bit of a Church history nerd with my advanced degree coming from a Baptist seminary... and I don't think there are any direct lines that can be drawn from the Anabaptists to Baptists. Some interesting connections/parallels though!
I'm actually super interested in Constantine and have read a bunch of the source material... how do you feel that I've idolized him? Mostly, I think I try to share the blame around instead of pretending that Constantine alone is at fault for the church marrying itself to the Empire.
If you're interested, here's a more focused message that's specifically on Constantine and the Empire Church:
ruclips.net/video/g9XiM_a3Fv4/видео.html
It is my opinion that we over-focus on Constantine and blaming him, instead of on the church leadership that so quickly and happily "baptized" the Empire and embraced any power and influence it offered.
If I were to do that message on Constantine again, I would emphasize how quickly much of the church started to shift to pagan terms. In many ways, it's fair to argue that to Constantine the Christian god was just another god in his pantheon - though perhaps he considered the Christian god to be his "patron" or favored god.
Unfortunately, all the primary source material on Constantine has to be read with skepticism, since it's mostly hagiographical. But it is all that we have. And I don't blame Eusebius for being happy that his friends were no longer being killed... but I do wish he didn't just assume a holy status on Constantine and Constantine's Empire. But I suppose we're all products of our times.
Blessings, friend!
~Tim