Final Cut Pro vs Adobe Premiere: Best Video Editor
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 фев 2025
- How professional editors select Final Cut Pro X or Adobe Premiere Pro X to edit their videos
Find out more about CleanMyMac X bit.ly/cleanmym...
The Final Cut plugins I use all the time mvfx.co/TylerS...
Listen to the full interviews stalmanpodcast....
Thomas Grove Carter thomasgrovecart...
Johnny Harris / johnnymangosteen
Matthew Moniz / matthewmoniz1
Jonathan Morrison / tldtoday
Where I get music & SFX bit.ly/2wmelx9
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
I know a Resolve fans will be disappointed I didn't give it any attention, but I have good reasons.
1. I don't know any editors working at a high level that are using it full time. I'm sure they're out there, but I don't know one.
2. Version 15 completely crashes when I try to playback and of my raw footage, so I moved to the public beta of 16 and although it doesn't crash, it still doesn't support the AVC footage from my C200. The fact that my mainstream workflow is unusable in Resolve means I can't take it seriously yet.
In the next 5 years Resolve will take a ton of market share and might even pull ahead of the others, but it's just not there in 2019.
Tyler Stalman I have a few questions regarding the podcast setup. Do you have any time to chat off line? Twitter, IG, etc...?
I guess those aren’t really “offline” options are they lol
What do you mean by doesn't supprt AVC footage. (By which I think you mean Canons XF-AVC)
That and all other flavours of AVC are fully supported by the studio version. If you work in H.264 (AVC) or H.265 you should probably be using the studio version because of the broader compatibility and especially the much much faster hardware decoding support. That is one of the main ways davinci uses to sell their studio version after all ;)
(Also resolve can run even faster with NVDEC and NVENC in the studio version if you use a Windows machine, so for all Windows users it is even more appealing)
@@MegaWeitzel Good to know that it requires the studio version, but I don't really have enough other needs for the studio version to justify purchasing it. I'm definitely not knocking Resolve, it's just not at the same play as the FPC and PP yet.
@@stalman How do arrive at the conclusion that it is not at the same level yet?
I mean we don't need to argue that the color grading in DR is more powerfull. It is basically industry standard for that.
Fusion while not yet at After Effects Level is way better than anything FCPX has
And Fair Light is arguably an audio suit maybe only matched by AVID
Which leaves the NLE part, what is there missing for you? For me it seems like just as good an NLE as the others. But maybe I am missing something I don't use.
Also the speed improvements alone over Adobe Premiere make it worth it for most windows users (FCPX is equally fast)
And all that at 300$, which is in line with FCPX and cheaper than adobe premiere. So again what is holding you back?
Adobe should give people the choice to buy their software for a fixed price to own it forever, like it used to be.
True! hoping wont change this FCX into sub thing per month.
@@kanzai12 If they do, it gives a lot of people a reason to switch (back) to Premiere.
Karianne Hylkema just get it on pirate bay your pretty dumb if you pay for it ngl
Subscription based licensing model = more money for Adobe, which is why they did it that way. #Capitalism
@@Mr.Voysey You're dumb.
There should be many many more views on this. Loved this doc style video Tyler. I can see it took a lot of work. Well done sir.
Thanks man, it feels good to know at least one person can see how long this one took 😁 probably not worth the effort for video that won’t be big, but I like how it turned out
@@stalman A second person here HIGHLY appreciated this!
@@stalman definitely worth it. i've been looking for this video and I'm super glad you made it. Now all that's left is Avid vs premiere ... :D that would be amazing though
@@RobinGroenevelt likewise
If Game of thrones was edited on Final cut pro that's good enough for me.
Legit😂😂
Except for that super dark episode that everyone complained about!!! Lol
Alfonso Romero winter fall oh boy I remember
@@alfonsoromero4502 only people with crappy TVs complained....I had no issue watching it
Sold facts lmao
For my personal youtube worflow, the blazing fast and efficient editing of FCPX wins it for me
Wow, I just watched your videos and then see your comments here...you are one of my favorite tech RUclipsr Ben.
Hi, how do you deal with rendering? my 2015 takes forever to render.
I am a wedding photographer/videographer. I have been a wedding photographer since 2014, but wanted to dab around video side of things at around 2019, used premiere pro till 2021 on my pc (I was okay-ish at it). I soon felt the need of an editing laptop on the go. Bought meself a Macbook pro 2017. Still on premiere pro, I was quite happy with it. Since I had a Macbook, I thought, why not give Final Cut Pro a chance, although I was not serious about it, FCP felt so easy that I just could not go back to premiere pro. In simple words, for me at the least, things in FCP are placed where they are supposed to be and within 2 months of switching to FCP, my workflow sped up by a mile. Got the Macbook air M1 (best purchase of my life), never regretted the switch.
Thanks for this video! I’m looking to jump from iMovie to (more than likely) Final Cut Pro. I really want to enhance my RUclips videos and also get into making music videos to promote my albums.
This dude is taking teal & orange to a whole another level
haha thought the same thing, he's a living teal & orange
You should check out Matt D'Avella then..
That guy has the best colour correction and teal and orange theme look to his videos!
honestly...
Wow.
Once I figured out how to get adjustment layers in FCPX, that’s what really help me choose final cut. Even though I still use Premiere for more complicated projects
I love how you got input from different editors on this. I can tell Adobe Premier has features I probably would want in FCPX, but the ease of use of the latter and its speed just can't be beat. I feel like Jonathan said - if you're on a Mac there's just no reason not to use FCPX. One thing you rarely hear acknowledged is that the FCPX is basically the older version of iMovie on steroids. What's questionable is why Apple then went and destroyed iMovie. There were lots of frustrated people when that happened.
for $$$
Honestly I use premiere on Mac. I want to switch to fcp but I have adobe cc so it seems weird not to use premiere.
This didn’t necessarily help me to pick either one but I did find this video very entertaining and amazingly well produced!
Thanks for this great, unbiased comparison. You've set the standard for how this sort of video should be made!
We switched from Adobe Premiere to Final Cut Pro X, and the difference in speed, ease of use and just overall look of the app is so much better. Adobe is sitting on an old code base and that may be its biggest problem, as opposed to FCPX which was completely overhauled and though had some hiccups initially, it is now such a robust application
Fully agree, Tyler. Really comes down to what works for you.
I’ve only just started editing videos, I went with FCPX just because I’m using a MacBook Pro and it seems like the easiest things to come to grips with and learn
You're exactly right.
I think a lot of people (established pros) were really hesitant to accept it in part because of how simplified it is. In Premiere Pro, you can really dial things in. Keyframes, masks, tracking, lumetri scopes, exporting with Encoder, etc. It's a very capable software. But to new content creators? It can be daunting. FCPX is easy to learn, you get a lot of pro features, and best of all, it's optimized. Premiere locks up, crashes, and the exports are comparatively slow. FCPX is quick and efficient. You don't even have to save your projects. It does that for you. It's ridiculously effortless.
I've been using fcpx since 2017- when I started vlogging. It's really fast and reliable, renders in the background
Costs less.
The fact that Adobe Rents its software is a deal breaker.
Me too. Final Cut serves all my needs and is very intuitive for a beginner. Also, the one time price is nice.
Stefan rhys your MacBook specs?
*Cough* Vegas Pro
Spot on with this, Tyler! Is not about which is better, is about what do you prioritize on your edits! Thanks for the video!
Thing is: it doesn’t matter what camera you use, great pictures comes from a vision not from an equipment... same applies to Editing
Yep
Oh common of course it depends
BoniBon 666 like using iMovie would be kinda tuff 🤣
It actually matters at least to a certain degree
True, but it won't help you choose a software. Also you can never make professional editing with imovie or moviemaker. You need Avid, Premiere, FInal Cut or Vegas Pro in order to do that. But as long as it is one of those top tier, then you are good.
Super glad premiere is better on Mac thanks to Intel quick sync!! In terms of comparisons tho we shall definitely have to see once the PC laptops with the latest 9th gen i9 come out since that's what MacBook are rocking now. Premiere is VERY processor heavy 🙏🏻 great video Tyler!!!
Thanks Sara! The good news is that whatever you choose these days, you won’t be making any massive compromises. I feel like I could safely edit on either one.
And soon I’ll be trying out a PC for the first time in a decade, so that will be interesting!
Final Cut Pro just has to release a new setting so we can choose between forced (connected) timeline or flexible timeline.
I also switched from Premiere, and it is frustrating when you have 3 video clip layers and three audio tracks. If you decide to remove a video track, it could remove all of them, depending which one is attached to which. frustrating at times.
Frustrating at times...is an understatement. A way around it is by using the position tool or tilder key
This is the most educational and unbiased video I've seen on this topic! This needs to be bumped up more on youtube because, like you said in the vid, other vids covering this topic seem to have a bias towards one or the other.
I started off with Premier and when I got my Mac and tying out FCPX and man it's so faster in every direction! I Know you can do lot with After effects integration but you can also do with Motion. I love the features of FCPX with auto save, not much of crashing, magnetic timeline, adding effects etc..
Doesn’t matter what the outcome is, already liked the video cause I appreciate your work!
GREAT VIDEO! I have been using iMovie for my first 30 RUclips videos but needed something more. After finding this video I will be going forward using Final Cut. Thanks for the help!!
i have never commented on a youtube video before , but the way you put the interviews together is amazing .
Couldn't agree more with Thomas's assessment - the software just gets out of your way so you can get in the flow. LOVE it for that. Any time I edited in FCP7/Premiere Pro I'm constantly bumping up against the application (dropped frames, clip collisions when revising, crashes, and NO ability to smoothly and easily organize the footage before I started editing) and losing my flow. If you shoot a lot of documentary or commercial work that has a lot of interviews, you'd be NUTS not to go with FCPX. The Magnetic Timeline, Multi-Cams, and all of the amazing things you can do to organize and log your footage (Favorites, Keywords, etc.) has saved me countless hours and significantly improved the quality of the finished video. FCPX all the way!
Midland Pictures how does that work without having layered tracks? Curious how you go about layering your broll over an interview. Are you having to cut the interview and add the broll? Seems harder to move stuff around. I’ve never used fcpx so I’m genuinely curious (and could be wrong about the layered tracks). I’m also a doc filmmaker so I’m surprised to hear fcpx over premiere.
@Amanda Horvath With the Magnetic Timeline you do get something that approximates tracks - the main difference is they're not locked in - they flow and adapt as your edit progresses. And there are a number of things you can do to clips above the main "track" of your timeline/sequence to enhance that experience (Secondary Storylines, Clip Connections, Compound Clips).
As far as b-roll over an interview goes, I layer it above my interview footage similar to how you would in Premiere. And it's actually much, much easier to move stuff around, especially when you use Secondary Storylines, know the key command to be able to move your Clip Connections, and use Compound Clips (which is like Nested clips in PP).
The tracks in Premiere, for me, are more of an obstacle to me getting in the "flow" - with FCPX I feel like I'm always thinking of something I want to do and then just easily doing it where with Premiere I'm always managing some kind of resistance with it. I felt the same way when I made the switch to Affinity Designer from Illustrator.
This tutorial is VERY old, but Larry Jordan does a good job of explaining the core concepts of the Magnetic Timeline and demonstrating how it works: ruclips.net/video/7W3zQ2bY8sQ/видео.html
Best part is he's editing in Standard Def! FCPX now, by the way, has a much fresher, modern skin to the UI (although the UI is pretty much the same).
The real magic with documentary editing is how FCPX lets you organize all of your footage. ESPECIALLY interviews. I use Favoriting to mark up interview clips and enter notes that summarize what the interviewee is saying. I actually have my assistant editor do all of that, and when I sit down to edit I can read those notes and see what questions were asked so I can spend my time building the story instead of playing back the interviews and grabbing chunks and sending them all down to the timeline and then try to organize it all in the timeline (like I have to do with PP and FCP7). Or, even worse, sending the entire interview down to the timeline and cutting it all up and removing the parts I don't need, then doing another pass and cutting out more, rinse and repeat. Sometimes I layer b-roll in as I go, sometimes I wait until I have a pretty solid story using the interviewees and THEN add b-roll in over the top. The bottom line is the software HELPS me tell stories ... instead of creating friction - dealing with the UI, clunky organization, a bunch of stuff to move and arrange if I want to move a section of a video up 2 mins in the edit, etc. etc.
This reply is already way too long! HMU if you have any more questions! I think the next video I might do on my channel should be "Why Documentary Editors Should Edit in FCPX". :)
Curious too :)
@@StephaneArcher See my reply to Amanda above! :)
Thank you for that great reply :) I cannot wait for your video :)
I used to use Final Cut Pro for all our RUclips videos when I worked for a guitar store, edited over 600 on it over the course of a couple of yrs. literally wouldn’t be able to do that in premiere at the speed I had to edit them.
Now I have went freelance I use Premiere Pro for all my projects, I prefer the multi cam clip functions and the layering in a non magnetic timeline. I feel it works better for the more polished projects that need finer tweaking.
Both have their pros and cons but just pick what you prefer and works for you .
In the past I have tried Adobe Premiere and too hard to learn so I switch to FCPX and found it so easy to learn. Love it.
By far the best introspective look at both editors... Very helpful, Thanks
One of the best comparison videos about anything that I’ve seen on youtube.
This was the best video I have seen comparing the two with no bias. Extremely well done
I liked that you have different users for each program giving their thoughts and opinion!
I love that u made this video. It’s something I wanted to look into coming over to RUclips and having a Mac. I didn’t want to just default to Final Cut without doing research first.
Thank you!
You dressed one of the biggest problems in youtube reviews (everyone telling the same story) and outclassed everyone by doing it different!
Loved this video, also your stuff always looks insane! 🔥 I use Premiere all day for editing my BBC stuff and then my RUclips stuff is all FCPX. I feel like I make this video every day in my head.
I use FCPX with motion (and other Apple pro apps) for 4 reasons: 1. no subscription. I paid once and now get all updates to the software for free. 2. Macs with nVidia graphics (like my 2014 MacBook Pro) are no longer fully supported by Adobe with Premiere 2019 whereas Final Cut supports it fully and without any problems. 3. I can edit 4k video with some pretty extensive edits with much better performance on said MacBook Pro without a major loss of performance. 4. The biggest problem I had with Adobe was with it creating a hidden cache of many of my projects in the hidden library directory that wouldn't clear out unless I manually did it and took up almost half of my hard drive.
merlin lee I’ve tried getting into Motion a few times without success. How did you get into it, any tips?
So I started with after effects (and honestly still know it better) but what I just do is try and find tutorials on RUclips of people doing similar things to me and watch those. It definitely has quite a learning curve
merlin lee very! I’ve bought it a few months ago and haven’t found many good tutorials. Even on RUclips. Feels like I’d maybe learn something that Apple will potentially let go at some point due to the lack of adoption.
I would love to learn motion too, just haven’t got around to it
Hi Tyler, great video. I'm a FCPX editor and I have a Mac, but recently I have found myself doing a lot of research into Premiere and heavily analyzing the pros and cons of one and the other one. Honestly FCPX give me everything I need in order to get the job done, however when it comes to the integration of AE with FCPX and Premiere I keep finding in my research that it is probably better to use Premiere if one is using a lot AE. I wish in the video Thomas would’ve gotten more into how FCPX works with AE. Maybe it is in the full interviews. I'll take a look at those. Either way, amazing stuff man, your channel is incredible helpful! Thanks for all your work.
Arturo Rivera That’s indeed a very underrated topic that barely anybody talks about today. I’d love to use AE with FCPX but I really don’t know where to get started. I guess rendering the files e.g. in 4K and then popping then into FCPX. There’s also Motion but that’s not nearly as popular, nor as powerful.
@@jetlagfortwo8565 Absolutely, it is very underrated and very few people make comparisons that have significant information on the subject.
This feels one of the most honest comparisons between these two NLEs, amazing to see first hand point of views from people that use it in full blown professional productions.
I have used mostly After Effects for over a decade (not Premiere) and have been wanting to dive in FCPX and Motion full-on, got most of the recommended plugins out there from MotionVFX, Red Giant Suite part that happens to be compatible with FCPX, FxFactory, etc... but man, I just can’t get in the flow most of the time, I’m trying to not fight the magnetic timeline, dropping a few titles here or there becomes an issue after a few stacked clips (navigation wise for me), dropping vs connecting clips from the browser, etc... I’m seriously having a hard time the few times I have wanted to use it.
The inspector for changing settings feels sluggish/slow... the transform/distort/etc tool good jesus...
Some things are amazing though, the fonts and text handling and the way most plugins hook into it, the way audio ‘trails’ can be left by just expanding and extending the audio part of a clip and fading it with the ready to use fader handlers at the edge of the clips.
Motion I haven’t used it as much, but the fact that there’s no concept of ‘pre-comps’ is a huge negative, however it’s amazing to create Transitions/Titles/Effects that will magically work in FCPX, plus the whole suite of Behaviours, Replicators, Particles...
I don’t know, I’m seriously torn... will continue to explore it whenever opportunities arise since I really want to master it little by little but can’t help but do a big frowned face when wanting to do some custom animations, expand the ‘animation curves’ (if you can all them that!) and add some keyframes on... that thing...
The maps animations shown on the Vox Borders though, for sure I wouldn’t risk it doing them in FCPX/Motion just yet... definitely would just attack it on After Effects and deal with the render times.
Excellent video nevertheless, subbed.
Do you still feel the same a year later any evolution in your opinion?
After a lot of years with FCX I tested Premier for After Effects and finally I decided only work with FCX and render for general content files in AE and edit the final result in FCX. But guys, Apple needs a renovated AE for MacOS.
Workflow and Adjustment layers are also a feature of Final Cut.
Ian Eisenberg it doesn’t already come with adjustable layers as you just stated. But you can install your own, it’s more work I know, but you can do it.
Premiere Pro also has adjustment layers 🤔
Great work Tyler 🙏🏼 informative as always. At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter what editing software you use, as long you put out quality work.
Really nice job! Thanks for putting in the time to interview people.
I just shot a video on an iPhone 11 and edited it on my phone using software called Videoleap. I couldn’t believe how efficient the whole process was, and it turned out fairly pro looking. It’s crazy how far technology has come.
Oh, wow. That Johnny Harris twist makes things REALLY interesting! If Premiere can figure out all of their crashing and stuff AND continue to speed up exports/optimize playback, it might be worth it for me to check out. I almost wish they did a rewrite from the ground up. That thing seems like it is old and bloated.
Faster render times is a huge step forward, this will have a huge effect on some people’s work
Exactly what I needed to hear! Been thinking about switching from FCPX to Premiere (bc I already use everything else adobe), but I realized that FCPX still works for me. I don’t have problems with it and I’m okay sacrificing the adobe ecosystem for my comfort with speed and ease of FCPX! Thanks Tyler
This is one of the best made comparison videos I've ever seen, thank you.
Man i came across this video and i want to say it was a really nice thing to see that you took others take on them as well as machines they use, i found it really helpful and very interesting to watch. Thank you!
I was JUST having this internal debate with myself this weekend and then BOOM, Tyler's got an in-depth video on it. Happy Monday to me.
And an even more in depth podcast ;)
@@stalman I've never been a podcast person, but you may convert me.
Tyler Stalman gonna listen to it shortly! 💥
this was very helpful for me, thanks. I had been using FCP for years (although not super advanced with it), but currently working on a new project and all these people in my life said I HAD to start learning PP. Anyway, after way too many tutorials on how to use it, I now think I'll go back to what I know (and learn it much better)! This video solidified that decision. So, thanks again!
@Tyler Stalman the new version of final cut is really s step above premier...great for multicamera,...i went from avid to premier and now fcp
The photography of this video is massively amazing dude
FCPX is designed based on a story telling workflow. While premiere , gives you all the tools and let it to you to do whatever you want with it. For me I like the FCPX clean and simple look. However, premiere just throws everything on the screen and you just need to know what you want to do if not it does not appeal to a person to do something with it.
FCPX is like, “hey come do something with me load a video and make a story...”
Premiere is like “ hey! so whatever you going to do just do it”
I hope you get my drift.
Vanan Navarasan is it like adobe has everything u need and fcpx is like IMovie?
@@Delirex1 probably close to that
now thats just straight up Android vs Apple :)
@@Delirex1 Not really. Premiere just kinda lays everything out in front of the user while FCPX grows with the user (at least that's how I'll put it). They both do the same thing for the most part, but they offer different workflows to accomplish those tasks. Whichever workflow makes more sense to you, that's the one you should pick. I personally love FCPX.
The Premiere's quote 😂😂
That's why I use/like it. See my videos you'll know.
This is the best comparison video I've ever seen. So nice to know both platforms are good and hear it from professionals. Thank you!
I like the style of interviewing editors to get answers about FCP vs. Pr
Thanks Tyler! This really helped me as someone who has never edited video. I write and direct films and, as a Mac user, I’m going to dive into Final Cut and up my game. Much appreciated, my brother.
This is probably the best comparison video I’ve ever seen.
And I’ve watched a lot.
so I got a bit of a confession to make. I was overly critical of your channel for a while. but now I've come to Really enjoy your content. keep up the great work.
the only thing that gets me is that subscription fee from adobe :/
Choose Vegas Pro or Final Cut then.
@@RecoveryKings do u have it cracked
@@RecoveryKings dang
Have kids and get the education version. 29.99/Mo for everything
@@otgcrypto2552 lmao
That my friend is how it should be done, this is honestly the best comparison of anything I've ever seen in my life of being on youtube over 10 years. 100 million % subscribed! BTW I would love to see a comparison on the loupedeck vs keyboards.
Biggest issue I have in FCPx is there is no audio crossfade keyboard shortcut. This is a basic task that happens many times during an edit, but for some reason Apple has kept that out of the application. I’m wondering if anyone else minds that issue.
Great video Tyler, and really interesting discussion too. I hear where Premier editors like Johnny are coming from when their way of working doesn't feel like it integrates well with the more linear-focused merits of the magnetic timeline... though more and more FCPX editors are beginning to realize you can just drop a long blank generator in the spine and use it as a static pin-cushion to stack all your clips onto, making it feel a little more like Premiere. If you're cutting a linear vlog, you have the option of ripping through and taking full advantage of how the magnetic timeline was intended to work... but if I'm cutting a non-linear trailer where I'm jumping all over the place for example, I might stack shots 15 clips high on a null generator, building something that resembles a giant lego castle of blocks in the timeline. I think Jonathan edits like that from time to time too, depending on the project. I know he and others catch flack for editing like that (because part of the FCPX community thinks they're not using the magnetic timeline "correctly"), but it works really well for non-linear edits. From there, it boils down to the underlying efficiency of the codebase... and being able to stabilize clips in seconds rather than minutes is what saves me the most time on a day-to-day basis. In any event, sorry for the novel and hope this helps :)
What editor is faster for stabilizing clip? I'm not sure I get it :)
Stéphane Archer - FCPX is faster at stabilizing clips :)
Thank you ❤️
Such an awesome video man, above and beyond just sitting and talking about pros and cons. Loved the almost documentary style of it, quite different for this type of video 👏
I love this! Definitely the most informative video I've found on the subject and I'm only 2 minutes in. Thanks Tyler!
Very well said man! I like the fact that you interviewed users for both software.. Well, in the end as mentioned...whatever makes your creativity, skills and flow much easier just go for it..👌🤘
Love how all RUclips creators being interviewed each show multiple angles of their faces as if it were their own episode 😅😅 Jokes aside, really helpful insights!
I appreciate how you had so many people giving their input. 👌🏼
love Johnny Harris works. Simply amazing
I really enjoyed this video! As someone who has used Avid, Final Cut 7, X and Adobe Premiere over the years there are benefits to all these NLEs. Honestly people should just pick whatever works for their workflow and go from there.
The really smart person just learns both and uses what’s best for that particular project.
That person would also be wealthy because owning both programs is pretty expensive 😅
Brea Jones the smart but poor person cracks both
Yep, and you add more value to the marketplace.
@@carlsonng4457 That usually means using an older version
Eisenhower303 you could download the latest version every time. Takes a bit of time, but possible. Cracked versions come up super fast these days
Yo dude i just want to say, What a great video! Great research, Great visuals and audio, Great editing. Really enjoyed it!
Currently switching to FCPX after years on Premiere and really excited about the potential. The magnetic timeline, although intimidating to learn, is actually making my workflow a lot quicker. It's also great to have no overwriting. Have been getting frustrated with constant crashing and bugs in Premiere and also the color issues upon export if you're not coloring on a REC709 calibrated monitor. FCPX is a breath of fresh air. Also the fixed price of FCPX is nice.
Did you used premiere with a mac ? I lag with adobe premiere with a brand new 2500€ tower (pc) (i9 // 8cores // 5ghz overthread)..
Used premiere for 15 years. Then got a MacBook Pro and Fcpx never looked back so much faster. Not having to scale mismatched footage and respeeding footage makes life so much easier
When you say faster. Do you mean playback and editing? What's makes you faster?
Stéphane Archer both but mostly editing you can get into the flow way easier. Plus working with a track pack and not a mouse make it much easier to edit on the go
I'm currently using premiere and thinking seriously about getting a MacBook pro, following a similar path. I will be glad if you can develop what makes you enter the flow in Final Cut? I still don't know what's will make me never look back in FCPX. How much it will make a difference. Thank you :)
Stéphane Archer do it !!! Check out Tyler’s podcast ep 47 really good stuff in there
What's make you enter the flow? 😆 I don't get it 😆
Granted I don’t do video editing full-time but I’m definitely all in on Premiere. I haven’t ever been able to move past the feeling of being super limited from FCP. Like it just feels like in order for FCP to be usable I *have* to download multiple different plugins and spend extra money on that just to be at the level that Premiere starts at.
The cost component for some creators is a big part of the equation. FCPX one time cost is a huge money saver, plus the fact that you can scale it to as many machines as you want. The other aspect to consider is FCPX plugin market is very robust and varied.
Premiere is a more capable program but adobe keeps focusing on high-end features rather than just overall speed and stability. I hope the new optimizations they have been doing continue.
I think it really does just come down to how you work and what you feel looks and acts right. For me Premiere looks exactly how I imagine editing videos. I have Final Cut and Resolve and I have a cursory understanding of how to navigate them BUT when I open it and look at it...it just doesn't inspire confidence. Also I've used Premiere for 3 years and have had almost no issues and certainly nothing major. Whatever you use, use it and love it....and be kind to your tools :)
Thanks Tyler. I have both programs on my MBPro and recently switched to FCPX from Premiere Pro, wondering if I did the right thing :) Choices, eh?
I’m full time on FCP and have no regrets
Great video - love the interviews with the people that actually use the product AND which does not sound bias :P
Helpful video! Basically since I have a Mac Pro I should just stick with final cut. Thank you !
Very interesting video Tyler! I've used Premier a few times and the rendering times are vary long sometimes
Thanks for your comparison video! As a complete, utter beginner to video film-making but a years-long macbook user and a frugal consumer, I'm very opposed to the ongoing costs of Adobe products. Adobe P. may be better for pros, but that's exactly the point-a pro is making money so Adobe P. is simply a business investment, really with little cost to the pro since they are making, hopefully, serious money off this software. For those of us enthusiasts for whom video/documentary shooting is strictly a hobby, I won't pay what will become an outrageous expense over time. I don't find Apple to be generous at all, normally, with ANYTHING, but in this case, Final Cut Pro X looks to be a definite "deal" compared to Adobe P. As well, from the video reviews, Final Cut Pro seems to be much more user friendly to the beginner. I would assume that for years to come the X edition will be useful. Thanks again for this very helpful review.
Great look at these different softwares. Nice to get multiple experienced opinions on one spot.
I did edit on Premiere for over a year... ended up choosing FCPX for two reasons: 1. For the things I need (I am a lazy guy) - FCPX has everything I need and makes my personal workflow faster. 2. I am not willing to pay 60€ for CC every month.
Why it's faster for you? What makes the difference?
@@StephaneArcher I mostly need just basic things... and what was a difference for me e.g.: If you have a clip adjusted in time/speed you had to go to AE for warp stabilisation. In FCPX you don't
This is probably the best comparison video out there. Thanks!!!
Love from India :)
Editor here. It's just a tool, the craft hasn't and won't change. Now, if you want to make a living off of editing, learn what your location primarily uses. I'm in the Bay Area and Premiere is dominant in most post houses or agencies. I've yet to go to a house that has FCPX or Avid as their main NLE. If I moved to LA, I would need to adjust to Avid. If you're freelancing in the comfort of your own studio, use whatever you like. I started with FCP7, made the jump to Premiere. Tried FCPX and did not like it lol...
As a Premiere Pro user for well on 20 years who switched to FCPX 2 years ago all I can say is FCPX is the future. Premiere is a great piece of software but is limited by the time line actions being an emulation of the original analog of film editing from the past. Switching to FCPX as a long time user of Premiere was not easy but once I mastered it I could never go back. I liked your video Tyler and agree that it is a personal decision and for me I have found FCPX has unleashed a creativity in me that I could never achieve with Premiere and I edit all types of video from short blog type videos right through to very complex two hour productions.
I'm a FCPX editor and it's amazing and super fast for personal films, events and things you want done fast but even with my bias, I can see some things that could make premiere better for some of those longer projects that aren't at all chronologically based like a documentary. However, adobe really needs to work on stability and number one UI design bc it's pretty awful when it comes to that.
Hi everybody...
I can’t figure out what to do for my SECOND project. Do I just start a NEW library, etc. or do I somehow have to “clear the field”.
Please HEEEEEELP : }
FCPX is the winner for me, I have been using it for 6-7 years, and man the workflow is so good, also I have my own effects that ppl put so much time to make in a video. But I allready made them as effects and transitions that helps alooot with the workflow.
1. At what aperture did you shoot this video
2. You could also mentioned the gear you used in the discription
This video helped me so much into choosing my next laptop depending on the editing software I feel will be better for me witch is final cut pro ! NEW SUBSCRIBER!🙂
You are not biased.. Loved it.. You have just earned a sub
I've had Clean My Mac...(X) for YEARS. LUV IT!!!
Main thing keeping me from going to FPCX is how apple just canceled aperture photo after I had my thousands of images catalogued. Seems like they ignore their pro users and software.
Thanks so much for your video! Very helpful!
Notable films edited on Adobe Premiere Pro
Act of Valor.
A Liar's Autobiography.
Avatar (daily and basic edits in conjunction with Avid Media Composer)
Captain Abu Raed.
Deadpool.
Dust to Glory.
Gone Girl.
Hugo (except VFX work)
I miss the scrub nob from fcp7 I know x has an equivalent but you can fine tune better with the nob
you are a boss - what a fantastic video! very well done - I pray you have amazing success in your endeavors!!
thank you for making this. I have really been wanting to dive into making videos. I know I have a lot to learn, but this helped me make a decision on where to start.
For the fact you can use luts in Final Cut Pro X. It serves my needs.
Great review Tyler! As a FCPX and Motion user I'd be curious to hear a bit more of the limitations Johnny had with FCPX/Motion. The animations I saw are all achievable with Motion. Totally understandable for personal preference and there's a lot of things I like about Premiere and After Effects. It's great to have all these editing options.
Your comparison video has been awesome for me as a beginner film editor. Thanks!