Every OLED 240hz monitor and up has .03 ms. Nothing special there. Wheres the real input lag test compare to the asus oled 480hz or the LG variant coming out.
I really hope that 5.1ms input lag figure is not accurate (based on the PCMag review), because that would make this "eSports" monitor absolutely obsolete to any serious player.
0,03 milliseconds is just a meaningless sellpitch. The screens refresh rate is 480 hz. Meaning every frame is using 2,08 milliseconds until the next frame is shown on the screen. That means that you will not notice any difference between a screen that has 0,03 milliseconds response rate and screen that has 2,08 milliseconds response rate when the screens refresh rate is only 480 herz.
WOW 👑 SONY GOD FOREVER 🥇✌️👑
If your screen is 60 hz you only need a response time of 16,67 milliseconds if some pro gamer wants to know. 😉
Every OLED 240hz monitor and up has .03 ms. Nothing special there. Wheres the real input lag test compare to the asus oled 480hz or the LG variant coming out.
I really hope that 5.1ms input lag figure is not accurate (based on the PCMag review), because that would make this "eSports" monitor absolutely obsolete to any serious player.
PC mag updated their article. Under 1ms now. The early measurement was an error from a different model.
Take care ⚡
@@AllisonRoadWest OH HELL YEAH
0,03 milliseconds is just a meaningless sellpitch. The screens refresh rate is 480 hz. Meaning every frame is using 2,08 milliseconds until the next frame is shown on the screen. That means that you will not notice any difference between a screen that has 0,03 milliseconds response rate and screen that has 2,08 milliseconds response rate when the screens refresh rate is only 480 herz.