Mystery drones did not exhibit hostile intent: Pentagon | Morning in America

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024
  • New details are emerging about drones that flew over U.S. military bases last year, though there is still no explanation for where they came from. Gordon Lubold, a White House and national security reporter at The Wall Street Journal, discusses what he learned during his investigation into the drones' origin and why they were sent.
    #mysterydrones #Pentagon #nationalsecurity
    Start your day with "Morning in America," NewsNation's live three-hour national morning newscast hosted by Markie Martin. Weekdays starting at 6a/5C. #MorningInAmerica
    NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
    More from NewsNation: www.newsnation...
    Get our app: trib.al/TBXgYpp
    Find us on cable: trib.al/YDOpGyG
    How to watch on TV or streaming: trib.al/Vu0Ikij

Комментарии • 556

  • @tramer76
    @tramer76 3 дня назад +262

    Yeah, the military gets a trillion dollars a year but can't figure out what a few drones are doing for seventeen flipping days?

    • @MicroaggresiveNiceGuy-d5f
      @MicroaggresiveNiceGuy-d5f 3 дня назад +12

      DOD told the air force base to ignore no doubt. I find that scary to be honest here.

    • @Foolofatook889
      @Foolofatook889 3 дня назад +11

      They know what it is lmao If they were concerned they would have been shot down, if they were spying they wouldn’t have blinking lights on them.

    • @Foolofatook889
      @Foolofatook889 3 дня назад +4

      @@MicroaggresiveNiceGuy-d5f because ITS US.

    • @jpined14
      @jpined14 3 дня назад +6

      They don’t want to give up their illusion of authority.

    • @coulj6917
      @coulj6917 3 дня назад

      Bingo! It is more likely that they're UAPs and the DOD is playing ignorant here.

  • @wildcatcreeksurvival2414
    @wildcatcreeksurvival2414 3 дня назад +166

    No hostile intent, just mapping out secure locations...

    • @Foolofatook889
      @Foolofatook889 3 дня назад +6

      They wouldn’t have blinking lights on them and they wouldn’t be the size of cars to do that 😂

    • @joel148801
      @joel148801 2 дня назад

      ​@@Foolofatook889why so? Foreign adversaries know this administration won't act on it. Why hide? I mean they allowed Chinese spy balloons to transverse our entire country before finally downing one only after the public became aware of it. This happened in December and we just here about it? The next one will most likely be shot down only because we know about it now. This administration is a joke. Amateur drone enthusiast don't own drones like this. There was serious money involved and any private citizen wouldn't take a chance of having them shot down for flying in restricted air space. My drone tells me when I'm in restricted space and won't even let me take off.

    • @TheBrall
      @TheBrall 2 дня назад +3

      While I understand your point, if the UAP wanted to "map" the location without being noticed, I'm sure they could. With ease.
      Bright lights? Wide open area? One of the highest security air zones in the USA?
      ... This was a handshake. A purposeful gesture. Communication.
      What are they saying in the communication? What is their intent? That's the questions we should be asking. Clearly the intent isn't all negative. The communication done publicly and overtly before the eyes of all is a message written in all caps. Clear and obvious. Humans are simply slow on the uptake.

    • @chchchahahah
      @chchchahahah 2 дня назад +1

      ​@@TheBrall💯👂

    • @BlastedOffRawPuerh88
      @BlastedOffRawPuerh88 2 дня назад

      Exactly..scouting

  • @mattlehner419
    @mattlehner419 3 дня назад +154

    If it was my drone i would be hunted down, assaulted and arrested and called a terryist

    • @Thunderbyrd.
      @Thunderbyrd. 3 дня назад +5

      A terryist?

    • @Emogyal
      @Emogyal 3 дня назад +8

      @@Thunderbyrd.someone who really likes terry fabric

    • @beeasy4360
      @beeasy4360 3 дня назад +2

      Lmao

    • @heliarc5186
      @heliarc5186 3 дня назад +12

      Tell us you dont know how censorship works without telling us​@@Thunderbyrd.

    • @surfman88
      @surfman88 3 дня назад

      Lol

  • @neilgault4610
    @neilgault4610 3 дня назад +87

    Flying a craft....manned or unmanned....in a restricted airspace is automatically considered as hostile.

    • @josray2557
      @josray2557 2 дня назад

      No it is not..... The pentagon isn't even allowed to shoot drones down over restricted airspace. We can fly drones over area 51 and record whatever we want and they can't do anything about it.

    • @stephenbrewins3689
      @stephenbrewins3689 21 час назад +1

      You know what is considered hostile,hurty words.what a sad administration this is.

    • @neilgault4610
      @neilgault4610 19 часов назад +1

      @stephenbrewins3689 Damns bro.....can't argue with that. Truth.

  • @amandameares6275
    @amandameares6275 3 дня назад +103

    If they’re not sure what these things are, why do they keep calling them drones?

    • @celura
      @celura 3 дня назад +7

      Truth

    • @anoxie1301
      @anoxie1301 3 дня назад +4

      Spinning, 6 months later.

    • @nay909.
      @nay909. 3 дня назад +6

      Can drones even stay up in the air for 17 days??

    • @LoisGram
      @LoisGram 3 дня назад +2

      @@nay909. Depends on the type of propulsion system they are employing! Probably not drones.

    • @projectocamero7502
      @projectocamero7502 3 дня назад

      Maybe they scanned the inside and see no humanoid?

  • @capitolconfusion
    @capitolconfusion 3 дня назад +78

    With today's technology, they're telling us that they don't know what they are or have an idea lol. Im calling bullsh@£t on that one. Do they think that we are all imbeciles or something 😂

    • @soniaellis163
      @soniaellis163 3 дня назад +9

      And no close ups, yet you can guarantee their air technical intelllligence will have a hole mass of close ups from every angle .

    • @tonka5
      @tonka5 3 дня назад +5

      Tax paying imbeciles is the group I belong to. We are also called sheep, stupid deplorables and other nice things by the people who represent us, collect our taxes, ignore our phone calls for assistance with disability, all while borrowing money and inflating the economy.

    • @SoHighITouchTheSky22
      @SoHighITouchTheSky22 День назад

      They just know we are weak and wont hold them accountable.
      We will be invaded by china before much longer

  • @jamescoyle4899
    @jamescoyle4899 3 дня назад +30

    They say they don’t know, but they know

  • @frogvet68
    @frogvet68 3 дня назад +91

    Flying over our bases IS HOSTILE.

    • @JoeysClones
      @JoeysClones 3 дня назад

      Shhh..Don't mess up the lie of unauthorized airspace 100% would be decimated..They don't want you to know about the sweep.

    • @oliverkaiser794
      @oliverkaiser794 3 дня назад +16

      Flying in US airspace without permission is hostile.

    • @frogvet68
      @frogvet68 3 дня назад +2

      @@oliverkaiser794 absolutely

    • @GoldMediaDVS
      @GoldMediaDVS 3 дня назад +2

      Exactly!

    • @brillo31
      @brillo31 3 дня назад +1

      Finally some common sense

  • @brandondetroitfanmichaels4325
    @brandondetroitfanmichaels4325 3 дня назад +53

    So civilians, are allowed to fly their drones around bases? And we won't go to jail?

    • @tictac1337
      @tictac1337 3 дня назад +4

      try it

    • @brandondetroitfanmichaels4325
      @brandondetroitfanmichaels4325 3 дня назад

      I did for 17 days...​@@tictac1337

    • @pigeonguardgames507
      @pigeonguardgames507 3 дня назад +3

      I'm guessing if in law they are allowing UAPs to fly without facing charges, then it would seem that it was ok for everyone to do this, just don't show hostile intent.

    • @mosubekore78
      @mosubekore78 3 дня назад +1

      Iirc a youtuber did it a few years ago, but using a small drone, and nothing happened to him actually.

    • @EchoP7596
      @EchoP7596 2 дня назад

      Only if you are China

  • @ernestsantana449
    @ernestsantana449 3 дня назад +59

    So, if I robbed a bank without showing hostile intent, I wouldn't be arrested?

    • @pigeonguardgames507
      @pigeonguardgames507 3 дня назад +7

      Not if you were a UAP

    • @oliverkaiser794
      @oliverkaiser794 3 дня назад +1

      @@pigeonguardgames507 good to know

    • @ii-cr1go
      @ii-cr1go 3 дня назад +1

      How does one rob a bank without any hostile intent? It's also a bad analogy. How does one equate robbing with trespassing?

    • @stewstube70
      @stewstube70 3 дня назад

      How do your propose to arrest a UAP?

    • @ernestsantana449
      @ernestsantana449 3 дня назад +1

      @stewstube70 you shoot it down, gain all available info or surveillance it to a final destination, possibly hack and trace, attach a tracker to it or any other possibilities. We have the most advanced military in the world and we couldn't do anything? What if it was armed? Then what?

  • @nerdraged411
    @nerdraged411 3 дня назад +36

    1. Drones have flight disablers embedded into their hardware making it impossible to "swarm" them over US bases, Airports or any sensitive location.
    2. If it WAS American "hobbyists" these people CAN and ARE triangulated and arrested, quick, especially if they intruded over a military base or airport.
    3. Over 100mph? DRONES? Swarms of them? Cmon. Anything flying that fast would have caused fighter jets to intercept and shoot them down. This isn't even up for debate.
    Most likely it wasn't "drones" like their cute little map images make it appear and so what was flying fast, in groups, over US bases? Something the military apparently couldn't shoot down because they couldn't catch them and because it wasn't a drone or swarm of drones. What's left? 👽👽👽

    • @josray2557
      @josray2557 2 дня назад

      nope... Just drones. Go outside and look there's no aliens and never will be. That's the cover story coolaid they want you to drink.

    • @michaelherndon9573
      @michaelherndon9573 21 час назад +1

      @nerdraged411 Well put. God I sincerely hope it's Non human intelligence.

  • @thomasbijker2556
    @thomasbijker2556 3 дня назад +35

    I don't think China or any other adversary would be so stupid to "spy" for 17 days in a row with a swarm of craft blinking their lights. Why didn't they send some fighters or helicopters during those 17 days to investigate, the "drones" were flying with speeds of 100 Mph

    • @thomasbijker2556
      @thomasbijker2556 3 дня назад +6

      In adittion, I don't understand that "intelligent" media, their reporters and the "experts" they are intervieuwing is still swallowing and perpetuating such impossible explanations without asking these obvious questions

    • @davidrogerson2764
      @davidrogerson2764 3 дня назад +6

      ​@thomasbijker2556 The fact that the media don't ask obvious questions like "Isn't flying over an airbase automatically considered hostile", shows that they aren't trying to broadcast the truth either.

    • @jmua8450
      @jmua8450 3 дня назад +2

      They would if they are allowed to. We have been sold out.

    • @thomasbijker2556
      @thomasbijker2556 3 дня назад +1

      @@davidrogerson2764 Indeed, so this kind of brainless reporting makes them complicit with the cover-up and is an insult to the intelligence (of most) of their followers. I expected better from News Nation

    • @thomasbijker2556
      @thomasbijker2556 2 дня назад

      @@davidrogerson2764 Agree, they better stop reporting on this topic instead of perpetuating BS

  • @SaveTasol-cw3fs
    @SaveTasol-cw3fs 3 дня назад +21

    Morons. Hostile intent is information gathering.

  • @RWRogers
    @RWRogers 3 дня назад +65

    They’re preparing to unveil. There’s a lot more to this crap and clearly it’s becoming impossible to ignore or deny and they have no choice but to act like they’re learning alongside us. Just my guess

    • @GojiraScorn
      @GojiraScorn 3 дня назад +3

      Oh, I have been told this for the last 48 years and absolutely nothing has come of it.
      Wouldn't hold your breath.

    • @JoeysClones
      @JoeysClones 3 дня назад +3

      They were flying around Orlando. It's more so a look of suspended animation..that will have weird hex DNA like chem looking trails around it.
      They're long cylinder shaped, chrome almost like a bubble texture..and look like a plane with no wings or tail...
      Just hovers like a blimp too. But it's doesn't look like one..like imagine a floating long cylinder toothbrush holder or like the Chicago bean just floating.

    • @RWRogers
      @RWRogers 3 дня назад

      @@JoeysClones Hmmm? Now my mind goes to China. After the whole Chinese balloons in our skies? But it’s odd cuz they tracked several of them spanning all across North and South America? Most over the U.S. tho. Who knows what’s going on or what’s actually up……. I don’t trust our own government anymore. Plotting “terrorist” attack right before election?? Seems a bit odd though cuz im struggling to even really imagine what that is flying. 🤔

    • @RWRogers
      @RWRogers 3 дня назад

      @@JoeysClones hmmm? Now my mind goes to China. After the whole Chinese balloons in our skies? But it’s odd cuz they tracked several of them spanning all across North and South America? Most over the U.S. tho. Who knows what’s going on or what’s actually up……. I don’t trust our own government anymore. Plotting “terrorist” attack right before election?? Seems a bit odd though cuz im struggling to even really imagine what that is flying. 🤔

    • @JohnnyJitsu11
      @JohnnyJitsu11 3 дня назад

      Good guess and an optimistic one, hopefully it pans out this way.

  • @NeoVdV
    @NeoVdV 3 дня назад +47

    Who has car size drones that can go that speed and also hover and if spying ha e the lights on ??

    • @Here4theComments9
      @Here4theComments9 3 дня назад +1

      Really interesting point

    • @jamescoyle4899
      @jamescoyle4899 3 дня назад +2

      Also, 20 feet in diameter, which means it was saucer shaped

    • @JohnnyJitsu11
      @JohnnyJitsu11 3 дня назад

      I do

    • @TweezerShred
      @TweezerShred 3 дня назад +2

      Dude, Walmart. I bought 3 25ft drones that go 100 mph for 76.99 each.

    • @Here4theComments9
      @Here4theComments9 3 дня назад

      @@NeoVdV I think the gov is intentionally gradually leaking information to desensitize us to alien life leading up to actually coming out and saying it. The result is us being, “Yea, we know.” versus “OMG!!!!!, let’s now destroy society!!!”

  • @1DVSB
    @1DVSB 3 дня назад +18

    The hostile intent is flying drones in the restricted areas of military bases

  • @RobertJackson437
    @RobertJackson437 3 дня назад +33

    Of course we trust you pentagón 🙃🙃

  • @TheInfamousAlpha
    @TheInfamousAlpha 3 дня назад +18

    This just goes to show how inept the US military is. A huge waste of money

    • @ScoobieSwisher7413
      @ScoobieSwisher7413 День назад

      That is the most idiotic comment I've ever read in the history of YT.

    • @TheInfamousAlpha
      @TheInfamousAlpha День назад +1

      @@ScoobieSwisher7413 An air force base not being able to control it's own airspace. Whats idiotic about that?

    • @ScoobieSwisher7413
      @ScoobieSwisher7413 День назад

      @@TheInfamousAlpha You are discrediting all four branches of our military over an isolated incident. You should be blaming the rotting cadaver that is currently in charge of the country.

  • @aaronpeckham9508
    @aaronpeckham9508 3 дня назад +20

    Anyone that believes this hasn't been paying attention for the last 70+ years😂😂

    • @Meriysi
      @Meriysi 3 дня назад

      What are you implying aliens 👽?

  • @Fluvanna
    @Fluvanna 3 дня назад +35

    The balloons didn't display hostile intent, and they were shot down within hours of being found.

    • @Chonk-rl8go
      @Chonk-rl8go 3 дня назад

      Yeah after they probably data mined a bunch of American secrets 😂

    • @Nymphadora45uvyu
      @Nymphadora45uvyu 4 часа назад

      Sadly it was not hours, it was days… they knew and did nothing across the whole USA. The thought is USA was doing counter intelligence

  • @jeffkardosjr.3825
    @jeffkardosjr.3825 3 дня назад +25

    Is that what they're calling UFOs now?

  • @coulj6917
    @coulj6917 3 дня назад +11

    The journalists should b e asking the pentagon:
    Did the DOD launch any jets to take a closer look?
    Do they have videos of these flying objects?
    Why are they so sure that these " drones" didn't have any hostile intent?

  • @chrisstrout90
    @chrisstrout90 День назад +2

    Any unknown over any base in America is ALWAYS considered hostile........ ALWAYS

  • @bradleymetz5238
    @bradleymetz5238 3 дня назад +11

    Interesting how this is presented as a “feel good story”. So much fun that we know nothing about foreign craft owning airspace over our bases!

  • @rformetoknow479
    @rformetoknow479 2 дня назад +5

    No hostile intent is another meaning for "we can't do anything about them collecting information".

  • @Brad-gk9jd
    @Brad-gk9jd 17 часов назад +1

    OUTRAGIOUS! The whole administration should be jailed for allowing this to happen!

  • @SmartPhone-r4u
    @SmartPhone-r4u 3 дня назад +4

    Something invades the US territory, flies over a military zone, and doesn’t get shot down… simply because they were too nice and cute… something is off**

  • @JoeTheSpaceGuy
    @JoeTheSpaceGuy 3 дня назад +11

    Are UAP ruled out? How do they know its drones specifically?

    • @stewstube70
      @stewstube70 3 дня назад

      They don't, no one does. Swamp gas, weather balloons, Radar reflectors...... drones, that god someone invented drones - so they can have a new "explanation".

  • @LaenayaSathe
    @LaenayaSathe 3 дня назад +7

    "Drones," huh?

  • @allorganicplanting
    @allorganicplanting 3 дня назад +7

    I've seen these things just last week. 2 of them. And 1of them 2 days ago. And just last night. About 1 to 2AM . THEY came from the south west going north east. That's really strange.

  • @mikesilverthorn911
    @mikesilverthorn911 3 дня назад +7

    Anyone stop to ask themselves what the hell is going on? Makes ZERO sense! Why are they lying?!

    • @randomstonerrants5004
      @randomstonerrants5004 2 дня назад

      Plenty of times!! We live in a media dominated society and if the major news networks are not talking about it, apparently it's not important. I'd say "the powers" are lulling everyone to sleep with all this inaction. Something like "Drones" flying on multiple occasions over restricted air space would warrant at least a Jet interception, but nothing!!! Asking rational questions will only frustrate.....I understand how you feel.

  • @consciouscrypto3090
    @consciouscrypto3090 3 дня назад +8

    What a joke of a military when it comes to defending the home front.

    • @sharp3552
      @sharp3552 3 дня назад +1

      Yep! And our enemies are slowly figuring that out, if they don’t already know!

    • @stewstube70
      @stewstube70 3 дня назад

      So you want them to shoot down UFOs?

  • @FAA-DPE
    @FAA-DPE 3 дня назад +6

    STOP USING THE TERM "DRONES"
    When you have no idea what they are. You're intentionally misleading the public into creating the picture in their mind of a little quadcopter, or some jackass with an RC toy.

    • @LoisGram
      @LoisGram 3 дня назад +2

      Yep, they are being intentionally misleading. The big lie.

  • @emeryclifton9912
    @emeryclifton9912 3 дня назад +11

    Slow disclosure

  • @turbo-charged-v8341
    @turbo-charged-v8341 3 дня назад +4

    It's NHI and they know it, like they have known for decades

  • @BikeRidez
    @BikeRidez 3 дня назад +6

    Hum … let’s think about this… drone was over military base and we were doing nothing about it .. it’s A) a drone from a foreign nation and we don’t care B) alien drone and we don’t care , or C) it’s our drone being tested over our air force facility ??? What’s the most logical choice?

    • @soniaellis163
      @soniaellis163 3 дня назад

      Under the salt 2 treaty russia could fly there planes over selected bases , so could America, i think their is some kind of secret treaty regarding drones.

    • @stewstube70
      @stewstube70 3 дня назад +2

      D) Alien drone and there's nothing they can do about it. It would easily out-manoeuvre an attempt to shot it down. Also it would be very hard to cover -up such a shoot-down in a relatively populated area, so they daren't try.

    • @soniaellis163
      @soniaellis163 2 дня назад

      @@stewstube70i was thinking that as well, that to shoot down an alien probe would be a security nightmare, so they thought the best option is to leave them alone .

  • @shannono9158
    @shannono9158 3 дня назад +4

    I saw this drone over southern California in December. I watched it for about 20 minutes 😮

    • @Staceypotterphotography
      @Staceypotterphotography 3 дня назад +1

      Was it a human made drone?

    • @shannono9158
      @shannono9158 3 дня назад

      @Staceypotterphotography It looked exactly like this one. Absolutely human made.

  • @TsavosAlliance
    @TsavosAlliance 3 часа назад +1

    China switched from Balloons to Drones.

  • @Immaculate_Perception
    @Immaculate_Perception 2 дня назад +3

    No drones, BS! And the size of a car. Come on, UAP incursion!

  • @Lillilady888
    @Lillilady888 3 дня назад +2

    A 'drone' would not be lit up like that, especially if military spies, etc.

  • @Staceypotterphotography
    @Staceypotterphotography 3 дня назад +4

    What indicated they were drones and not some unidentified craft?

    • @soniaellis163
      @soniaellis163 3 дня назад +6

      Thats the big question isnt it , a mother ship releasing probes is what it sounds like to me .

    • @Staceypotterphotography
      @Staceypotterphotography 3 дня назад

      @@soniaellis163 maybe interdimentional beings, because they can’t shoot them down?

  • @NoBro-vn4uh
    @NoBro-vn4uh 2 дня назад

    Those are identical to the 3 I saw over my house. One was hovering 20 feet off the ground in my backyard and it was a black cube about the size of a van. Hovered there for about 2 minutes then slowly drifted away. I just smiled and waved. I was pretty scared but played it cool. I think about it every day. This was in 2021

  • @pjlarson1716
    @pjlarson1716 3 дня назад +2

    How do you know they’re drones?
    How can they say non-hostile if you don’t know what the hell they’re doing?
    Need a big net and a jet

  • @e99783
    @e99783 День назад +1

    Any other aircraft in restricted space would have been shot down. Why not these? Because the pentagon doesn’t have the technology to shoot them down

  • @ColtStone
    @ColtStone 3 дня назад +6

    There are only two possibilities here, and aliens are the least disturbing of the two.

  • @1ChilledDude
    @1ChilledDude 2 дня назад +1

    Isn't this all a little contradictory?
    The military are quite happy to shoot civilian drones flying over military bases. But they'll let these things fly over with absolutely no course of action.
    I believe they do know what they are. But aren't prepared to let the public know.

  • @aSouthFloridian
    @aSouthFloridian 3 дня назад +1

    How do they know? They contacted them to make sure?

  • @farrazdanny
    @farrazdanny 3 дня назад +6

    Pentagon surely loves to call'em UFO as Drone.

  • @Finnleigh.Jackson4141
    @Finnleigh.Jackson4141 3 дня назад +3

    The Wall Street Journal reporter seems very uncomfortable.

    • @UTP-SOI
      @UTP-SOI 3 дня назад

      yesssss

    • @datHDgameplay
      @datHDgameplay 3 дня назад

      being really careful with what they say

  • @roy-lennartandreassen3915
    @roy-lennartandreassen3915 3 дня назад +13

    It was ufo's no drones!!

  • @f.d.6667
    @f.d.6667 3 дня назад +2

    Well, these things basically pooped on your lawn to demonstrate they can do it ... but no hostile intent, sure.

  • @trevorgwelch7412
    @trevorgwelch7412 2 дня назад +2

    Military : " Intelligently Controlled ET Objects "

  • @H2O-81
    @H2O-81 3 дня назад +3

    of course it was recon

  • @monog4871
    @monog4871 3 дня назад +2

    Ok so can we start purchasing our own drones and start flying them over military bases. I mean if car size drones are not considered a threat then the ones from Amazon should be ok right??

  • @cornebod
    @cornebod 3 дня назад +4

    Neither did the Chinese balloons😂😂
    The USA couldn't do anything about these Chinese drones because all their air defense systems was given to Ukraine 😂😂😂

    • @Foolofatook889
      @Foolofatook889 3 дня назад +1

      Do you actually believe that? 😂

    • @cornebod
      @cornebod 3 дня назад +1

      @Foolofatook889 They shot down multiple non-threatening balloons and yet didn't even take a shot at these drones. Obviously, that is because they had nothing to shoot it with 🤗

    • @Foolofatook889
      @Foolofatook889 3 дня назад +1

      @@cornebod oh, dear 😂

  • @ckez4724
    @ckez4724 3 дня назад +1

    How do they know they are a threat?

  • @mattsapero1896
    @mattsapero1896 2 дня назад +1

    Oh, well, then everything’s fine. Who cares if our most sensitive sites are filmed and surveilled, right? 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻

  • @Nick-m2i
    @Nick-m2i 3 дня назад +3

    lol “they consulted the pentagons UFO office on this one” bahahaha that tells us everything we need to know.
    The “pentagons ufo office “ aka “AARO” lol 😂

  • @tommymyers3183
    @tommymyers3183 3 дня назад +2

    Where are these things from?

    • @JoeysClones
      @JoeysClones 3 дня назад +3

      Government. I have photos of them flying in Orlando.
      They look like a bubble like chrome in material texture on looks..but are these pill shaped, long cylinders..Kind of look like a plane with no wings or tail.
      All over our executive airspace near D.T.

    • @Staceypotterphotography
      @Staceypotterphotography 3 дня назад +1

      @@JoeysClonesAre they clearly human made drones? Or do they look otherworldly??

    • @mw9297
      @mw9297 3 дня назад

      @@JoeysClones the government above our government 👽🛸

    • @sunnyrizzle2834
      @sunnyrizzle2834 2 дня назад

      @@JoeysCloneslet me see I saw this last year in New Jersey it flew over my house going very slow

  • @MT-406
    @MT-406 3 дня назад +1

    Why would an adversary spy on a base with bright lights and a strobe on?

  • @lyndakorner2383
    @lyndakorner2383 2 дня назад +1

    NewsNation putting quadcopter symbols on the map is irresponsible and misleading.

  • @shumla7ranch
    @shumla7ranch 2 дня назад

    The Pentagon spokeswoman did NOT refer to them as "drones."

  • @davidkingsford1010
    @davidkingsford1010 2 дня назад

    Every day the government looks more and more pathetic.
    Full transparency please.

  • @jexy_marshall
    @jexy_marshall 3 дня назад +2

    So what's the point of having restricted air space if it's not restricted to everyone? And what's the point of registering drones if they can't identify it? And why couldn't they follow it with a helicopter? And why not just shoot it down to be on the safe side?

    • @UTP-SOI
      @UTP-SOI 3 дня назад

      Because they know very well what they are and they can't shoot them down over inhabited areas because someone might see that they are UFOs!

    • @datHDgameplay
      @datHDgameplay 3 дня назад

      seems they weren't able to disable. I'm sure if a regular consumer drone was flown over that base it would be easily downed.

    • @stewstube70
      @stewstube70 3 дня назад

      You think they are able to shoot down UAPs?

  • @jimcroft21
    @jimcroft21 3 дня назад +1

    When will we finally start hearing some truth in this country?

  • @SwampMyster
    @SwampMyster День назад

    Ironically a saw the same thing this year in Australia. At least 30 of them. Recorded on my phone.

  • @MisterWhatWhat
    @MisterWhatWhat 2 дня назад

    They know EXACTLY what/who they are which is why they did not engage.

  • @evolutionislife
    @evolutionislife 2 дня назад +2

    20ft drones....

  • @smitch1558
    @smitch1558 3 дня назад +1

    Unknown objects reconnoitering any military facility should be considered "hostile intent" (unless you know you don't dare do anything about them).

    • @LoisGram
      @LoisGram 3 дня назад

      Yes, I think that they know exactly what they are and they are powerless to do anything about them.

    • @elsieonyejekwe3132
      @elsieonyejekwe3132 2 дня назад

      Humans cant be completely powerless on our planet, if these drones or whatever they are were that capable they would have destroyed us all i feel they are also scared of us and perhaps a higher power God is protecting us

  • @WayneMacLean-lj8lb
    @WayneMacLean-lj8lb 3 дня назад +2

    In a interview I had heard. They said a big drone about 20 feet had much smaller drones flying around it. But unless the drones are seen as hostile. A law prevents them from being shot down. So then why is not a Blackhawk flying over a smaller drone and shooting a net over it to take it to the ground to examine it. A net is not a missile or even a bullet. They net big animals all the time the size of a elephant or rhino. But instead its oh drones were flying over a restricted military base but lets just do nothing about finding anything about it because they are not a balloon that we shot down with a 450,000 sidewinder missile. Drop a damn net over one.

    • @LoisGram
      @LoisGram 3 дня назад +2

      They don't need to because they exactly what they are and they know who has deployed them and why.

    • @WayneMacLean-lj8lb
      @WayneMacLean-lj8lb 3 дня назад

      @@LoisGram then why have the military talking about them at all and drawing attention to them. If it's to have more people think China or Russia is a threat. They could say we are aware the drones are from China or Russia our high tech picked up signals from the drones which falls in line with other Chinese technologies we have been monitoring. And if they do not want the public to think they could be extraterrestrial. Why not say the drones were a classified military drill. Why be saying we could not do anything about the drones at all. You might as well be saying to people in the field of extraterrestrials. The drones are extraterrestrial because that is how they come off talking about it. And nobody can see something on a video or while standing in the ground looking up at a bright light. And then consider that is 100% proof extraterrestrial beings are flying them. Not when you cannot look up at a plane and say one of the pilots is a women. Not saying extraterrestrial beings do not exist 100% or saying there is not any extraterrestrial beings flying to earth. But jumping from a sighting to something and then leaping saying extraterrestrial is just a assumption not a proven fact. But I do believe in some cases that are more likely extraterrestrial crafts. The government does know about them. But the only thing I heard on a podcast about these drones was some were loud. Like the sound of propellers flying drones are. They make allot of noise especially at night when there is less noise from traffic . I hope they were extraterrestrial myself. But would never bet my life on it being that sure of myself.

    • @LoisGram
      @LoisGram 3 дня назад +1

      @@WayneMacLean-lj8lb Have you ever researched Foo Fighters or Operation High Jump? Perhaps the military feels that a trickle of misleading disclosure is helpful at this time.

    • @WayneMacLean-lj8lb
      @WayneMacLean-lj8lb 3 дня назад

      @@LoisGram the trickling has been happening for over 70 years now. The only reason this subject is as it is. Because of a crash at Roswell. Then only 4 years later the movie The Day the Earth Stood Still in 1951 came out. Then a year after that movie which had a lit up crafts flying over the Capital and land in a field. Lit up crafts flew over the capital for real all lit up. Then more movies. Then Betty and Barney Hill. And reports of U.F.Os have been out by high ranking military people since at least the 50s and into the 60s. It's not like this subject is just something new that some military people have come out and talked about it. It might be new for people in the last 20 years or so. But they are more then likely younger. I am 69 years old. And had a interest in this subject for at least 50 years reading things about it. Things military people have said. Nothing has changed. One side says aliens are visiting earth and the government says no there is no proof of it. But what would the government do if suddenly a big giant extraterrestrial craft landing where suddenly hundreds of thousands of people flocked to the landing site. And traffic was locked tight for miles. That would be the greatest Disclosure possible. Would not matter what the government said or what people who did not believe extraterrestrial beings were coming down thought. I think that is what it going to take. Not just more people talking about it. 😱👽🛸

    • @LoisGram
      @LoisGram 3 дня назад +1

      @@WayneMacLean-lj8lb We're the same age. I believe that that is exactly what is going to happen. On clear nights numerous craft are visible hovering overhead in my area. I'm living in a veritable sea of stationary orbs and I've seen several craft up close this year. The orbs and the craft appear to communicate. Telepathic communications. Forced into public disclosures soon I think.

  • @ThomasKissel-w1p
    @ThomasKissel-w1p 3 дня назад +1

    YEAH....Sure, these "Drones" are also called: UFO´s and/or UAP´s.

  • @benjamjarmin
    @benjamjarmin День назад

    If it shows no hostile capabilities, is it still capable?

  • @Meriysi
    @Meriysi 3 дня назад +1

    If the fighter jets can’t see what they are that’s a problem. Also pointing towards ufos tbh

  • @markoconnell804
    @markoconnell804 3 дня назад +1

    How were they powered? What lift style did they use to keep in the air? Why were they not shot down? Or disabled? Or intercepted?

    • @Gateway10
      @Gateway10 2 дня назад

      Anti mater reactors with gravity field emitters.

  • @jmua8450
    @jmua8450 3 дня назад +1

    I want my money back. The U.S. MILITARY is a paper tiger.

  • @sladewilson4354
    @sladewilson4354 3 дня назад +2

    Of course they don’t… not right now. This is 100% a show of technology and force from a foreign country. Because they can, and there’s nothing we can do about it

    • @LoisGram
      @LoisGram 3 дня назад

      My rural village has been invaded by thousands of orbs and a few UFOs this year. S.H.I.E.L.D. agents have been on the ground for months here. They know exactly what these are and why they are here.

  • @AngeloXification
    @AngeloXification 3 дня назад +1

    Sooooo anyone can fly drones the size of cars over bases without consequence? I mean no "hostile intent" I just wanna take a look so Im in the clear accordingly to Pentagon logic

  • @richeromero
    @richeromero 2 дня назад

    I think what is more concerning is that the media and government has made us Americans so docile that we can casually discuss flying objects over the most advanced military in the world, and when they don't know what they are, we don't even blink an eye.

  • @paulanderson6609
    @paulanderson6609 3 дня назад +1

    I guess they have to wait for a hostel intent to determine hostel intent. Come on gov we aren't that stupid.

  • @mikewatkins1725
    @mikewatkins1725 3 дня назад +1

    Let's see: 10 months later, and nobody knows? And ots okay to hover over military bases with a "drone." For 17 days, and the military are helpless?

    • @UTP-SOI
      @UTP-SOI 3 дня назад

      Because they know very well what they are and they can't shoot them down over inhabited areas because someone might see that they are UFOs!

  • @rubar1025
    @rubar1025 2 дня назад +1

    How is this not headline news right now?

  • @ashleyeldorado7750
    @ashleyeldorado7750 3 дня назад

    How do they know what intent an unidentified object has?

  • @isikelihavea8008
    @isikelihavea8008 2 дня назад

    Still scary how close they can get😢😅

  • @waxandwayne
    @waxandwayne 3 дня назад +3

    They belong to the Pentagon.... duhhhh

  • @LorraineOkie
    @LorraineOkie 3 дня назад +3

    Drones not Ballon’s now

  • @johnbravo7542
    @johnbravo7542 12 часов назад

    It's just Skinny Bob watching the Nukes

  • @BumbleSquish1
    @BumbleSquish1 2 дня назад

    As soon as he is about to say there is no way a hobby drone could fly in there he shuts up, is he afraid to admit these are actually not drones?

  • @e.matthews
    @e.matthews 2 дня назад

    Surely they could tell what kind of propulsion system they were using???

  • @rubar1025
    @rubar1025 2 дня назад +2

    why is this being released over a year later?

    • @BsCurious
      @BsCurious 15 часов назад

      Its not over a year. It was December 2023. What month are you in?

  • @billw4801
    @billw4801 3 дня назад +1

    Just call a spade a spade. UAP’s! Not drones for crying out loud!

  • @ThomasRyan-s7o
    @ThomasRyan-s7o 14 часов назад

    It is clear as day, you can very easily tell that it is swamp gas

  • @jedi10101
    @jedi10101 День назад

    it's a stretch that they don't know. my gut tells me that the US military owns those & they're doing tests.

  • @MrPepper312
    @MrPepper312 3 дня назад +1

    If these drones were from a hostile adversary and are 20 ft long, its possible it could carry a nuke. But yet they chose not to shoot it down.

    • @Ufobuddy-p3i
      @Ufobuddy-p3i 2 дня назад

      Imagine it had a nuke and you take it down

  • @soniaellis163
    @soniaellis163 3 дня назад +2

    So where are the close up pictures, why are we, as always with the Pentagon shown objects that are titchy dots or blurred, they have had a hole year to release video and all we get is this perfetic example.

  • @timetravelingschizophrenic987
    @timetravelingschizophrenic987 3 дня назад

    NewsNation #1

  • @ShinyMon321
    @ShinyMon321 День назад

    I only saw 1 on the video and honestly it just looked like how some helicopters or planes look in the distance.

  • @SD_Chosen
    @SD_Chosen 18 часов назад

    Not hostile, but ate not concerned they could be spying?
    I mean, what's the concern level here?

  • @Vettemeats
    @Vettemeats 2 дня назад

    If they observed these drones they 100% tracked them and know where they went and landed (assuming they are drones). They would know exactly who’s they are if it was an adversary. If they truly don’t know then it could be something else they observed.

  • @craigmackay4909
    @craigmackay4909 2 дня назад +1

    No humano 👽

  • @rmac8878
    @rmac8878 2 дня назад

    "Didn't exhibit hostile intent'... That you know of...