Hello everyone so basically in the tech three the vg 1-5 is in tier two but it is actually in tier three, the same for the kar98k with grenade launcher. Also the Mp 38 and Mp 40 are in tier two not tier three
The FNAB-43 is the best smg of t2 for the following reasons 1: Its iron sights are good 2: The magazine is good at 40 3: The recoil is not cancer 4: Damage is actually good even with its lower fire rate This smg is more of an assault rifle in my opinion due to the ability to spray down enemies even at medium range which the 1918 struggles to do. Also remember that you can upgrade the damage, fire rate and recoil further to turn it into a pure death beam
Do note, bf109 although not the most powerful it's the most accurate with bombs I've flown while being easy to pilot. Taking out heavy tanks is easy due to how straight the bomb flys. This goes for all bf 109 with bombs, including the g6(which I have 2 of :D).
That's not a good weapon then, its submachine gun, submachines are mostly the best at close range, I lost many fights bc how low fire rate this weapons has, always fail against russian 700, 800 fire rate, with beretta 1918 chances are even .
Umm excuse me? You talk so much about all the historical aspects, and then somehow gloss over the Pz. III J1 as “essentially the same as the J”? The main gun is so much better, and most importantly the turret turns much faster. The early Pz. IIIs have painful turret traverse speed, and the J1 is the first one that fixes that problem. Personal tastes can differ, but the facts cannot. You say wrong stuff about the planes as well.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Hello everyone so basically in the tech three the vg 1-5 is in tier two but it is actually in tier three, the same for the kar98k with grenade launcher. Also the Mp 38 and Mp 40 are in tier two not tier three
You said the same thing two times, is vg 1-5 Battle rating 2?
@@Cyberbully3 it’s battle rating three
@@NapoleonTotal oh ok
The vg 1-5 and the grenade launcher is t3
The mp 40 is t2
VG 1-5 is BR 3, so is Kar98k with grenade launcher
MP40 is BR 2
The FNAB-43 is the best smg of t2 for the following reasons
1: Its iron sights are good
2: The magazine is good at 40
3: The recoil is not cancer
4: Damage is actually good even with its lower fire rate
This smg is more of an assault rifle in my opinion due to the ability to spray down enemies even at medium range which the 1918 struggles to do. Also remember that you can upgrade the damage, fire rate and recoil further to turn it into a pure death beam
Berretta m1
The fact the vg1-5 got bumped to tier 3 is bullshit its the only decent semi auto rifle against allies using the m1 carbine
My dude suggesting Tier 3s for Tier 2 lol.
Dude, it is so underrated that content creators keep things brief, but helpful, essentially it's efficient = You get 10/10 imo! Happy Easter to you.
did you have any idea about Japanese tier 5 weapons other than the ho-ri tank?
You did a pretty huge disservice to the fnab and the mp 34 ( and the panzer 3 j1 has a much better long barelled 50 mm )
Do note, bf109 although not the most powerful it's the most accurate with bombs I've flown while being easy to pilot. Taking out heavy tanks is easy due to how straight the bomb flys. This goes for all bf 109 with bombs, including the g6(which I have 2 of :D).
MP40
MG 13
Kar 98/arma de guerra
PZ F2
Stuka 500KG
The ju 87 d5 is very good to even tho it has less bombload it has 20mm cannons instead of mgs
Yeah the cannons can destroy any planes easily and do pretty good damage to tanks if you use then properly
The fnab 43 is very good because it has low recoil and ive gotten long range kills with it
That's not a good weapon then, its submachine gun, submachines are mostly the best at close range, I lost many fights bc how low fire rate this weapons has, always fail against russian 700, 800 fire rate, with beretta 1918 chances are even .
@@nikodemborowski796getting longe range kills is bad because it isnt what its meant for?!?
Umm excuse me? You talk so much about all the historical aspects, and then somehow gloss over the Pz. III J1 as “essentially the same as the J”? The main gun is so much better, and most importantly the turret turns much faster. The early Pz. IIIs have painful turret traverse speed, and the J1 is the first one that fixes that problem. Personal tastes can differ, but the facts cannot.
You say wrong stuff about the planes as well.
My bad