0-100 7,3 sec (0-105) 100-200 is lot slower - its diesel, thats why - it rews till 4500 and gearchange so torque on the wheel drops dramatcally with every gear. If it petrol revs 6000-7000 and gear ratios are closer each over so that why petrols are quicker on high gears
That's not true. Especially at high speeds the turbodiesel pulls very good because of the torque. And since when does the torque drop dramatically with every gear in a turbodiesel car if the car is still in the optimal powerband rpm? Smh ...
Yeap it is 2.0 lt diesel but With 240 hp and hell of torque I am expecting 100-200 less around 16 sec. Here around 20 sec very similiar with 1.6 lt turbo gasoline engines (180 hp) As possible reasons 4x4 and estate extra weight could count
You are wrong. This is amazing result for the 2.0 diesel engine. And this onboard design is different than the other cars. And somethink more 0-100 and 100-260 has a same size so 0-100 is really feel faster.
TheFunkyair 0-200 speed isn't bad considering it's got AWD and only 7 gears. It needs more gears though, 7 for this amount of hp in such a small diesel engine isn't enough.
It's slow after 60km/h because the speedo scale is different compared to 0-60 - so it creates an optical illusion that it's super faste up to 100km/h but very slow from there on.
Nope, each km/h marker is 20 km/h apart from 0 all the way to 260 km/h. On some Volkswagen and Audi cars it changes to bigger intervals, but not this one. It definitely doesn't look slow though.
GyroPyro12 Are you blind or something? Look carefully, the bigger interval goes from: 0-20, 20-40, 40-60 (that means all are 20km/h apart) then it changes to 40km/h for bigger intervals on the SAME scale: 60-100, 100-140....etc.
@@STR1XDLB from factory the hp is always at the crank. Never the wheel. Also it weighs 1635 kg and its a 4 cilinder(stock) with a chip tune this thing goes to 300 hp :)
stoneeh flooring is not everything. a 3.0 bitdi with same amout of power on a6 handles it in 20 seconds, a friend tested it. 2.0 bitdi is a bit of a waste. you get 2.0 tdi for fuel consumption with decent power. if you want a fast car and decent fuel consumption, 3 little bitdi is the way to go
@stoneeh: Corrado is light and has small and light wheels. Also, I think it will pull a bit on the Corrado anyway. So no, it is not as fast as the 190 hp Corrado, it is a bit faster.
Easy Playing You can see 21:14 on the dashboard, the water is almost 90 degrees. The full acceleration was at 22:15 as you can see. So nothing to worry about. :-) And the amount of km's you see is from trip, which you can reset, most of the time these cars have driven 5000km already. Have a nice day :)
You´re right but take it easy - because of such people car repair shops do have business. If everybody knew how to treat his car properly it would mean a lot of lost jobs. Still frightening though that there really are people who think that one minute might be enough to warm up a car. For the ones who don´t want to ruin their diesel: between 0 - 20 degrees C you need to drive at least 12 - 15 km before you can hit the gas. Under zero degrees it can take as long as 20 km driving in the mid rev range. And don´t leave the engine running too long before you start driving - it´s a myth that you do your car good. the oil pump doesn´t like that at all, neither does the engine. The best you can do is start driving immediately in the mid rev range and after warming up the water wait at least another 5 minutes or 10 km before hitting the gas hard. I don´t tell anybody to listen to my advice. If you can afford a new engine, kill your current one. It might be instantaneous or take a long time - but it will come.
It was warm enough. And besides, a modern engine can cope. Having said that I still prefer to wait till everything is up to temperature before driving hard.
Kluci, docela by bodlo, kdybyste nekam napsali (do popisu videa nebo aspon clanku, na ktery odkazujete), za kolik to udelalo kilo a dve kila (skutecne km/h - zadne "rychlomerove zazraky"). Tady to vypada na cca 7,3 s 0-100 (od trhnuti na startu az po rucicku rychlomeru jakoby na 105 km/h) a cca 31 s 0-199 (rucicka cca na 209), pokud bychom brali pridavani rychlomeru 5 %. To tedy znamena 100-200 za cca 24 s, coz sice neni spatne, ale zase na danou moderni technologii (dve turba, DSG, 7 stupnu), cenu, vykon, kroutak, hmotnost, spotrebu, zvuk atd. zadny zazrak. Protoze ty hodnoty zrychleni jsou podezrele spatne (vyrobce uvadi kilo za 6,1), je mozne, ze jste jeli do mirneho kopce (subjektivne treba temer neznatelneho) nebo (kvuli danym gumam atd.) rychlomer pridava podstatne mene nez 5 %.
very ugly, artificial looking clocks, very odd diesel sound, it is also these sound generator or? and for 240 ps very average acceleration, is it still best in class? oh I forgot, one of the ugliest cars in its class. another odd vw, buy Mazda 6 or something much better then this shit.
ℹ Here are the acceleration times: 0-60 mph → 6.0 s 0-100 km/h → 6.3 s 0-100 mph → 15.7 s 0-200 km/h → 27.3 s Top speed reached: 207 km/h (129 mph) at 31.4 s and hard braking from this speed to 0 at 6.7 s
NikuCN not being smart but its a Passat there only made for one reason only,cheap road tax,good resale value,long service intervals.a Passat is all about cheap running costs not how slow it takes to get to 100,just like all cars nowadays its all about low emissions,low tax ,low running costs,nobody wants speed anymore those days are gone. Diesels will be winding up over the next few years as petrol/electric take over and finally electric take over for good until the next big thing is invented .as of right now if we lived in france we would be offered money to scrap our diesel cars and replace them with electric,the sooner electric comes in the better,,,super low runnings costs almost no maintenance,no more servicing as electric motors could last the life of the car,new batteries have already been invented that are way better than all that have gone before and charge in mins.it is very likely our children will now nothing only electric cars.the sooner the better.
this engine is not good for Passat and it will be better that Passat have same engine like new Audi A4 have!! Audi A4 have 3.0 TDI 272hp which got 1-1,2 sec better acceleration and less fuel consumption than this 2 liter engine from Passat!!
you're kids arguing over who's got the fastest bicycle. Can you say Chevrolet 437 L88. Advertised at 435 HP, but they were lying. They dynoed over 550 HP. Almost 1.3 hp per CI without fuel injection or overhead cams, or computers.
Ah, I see VAG is still bullshitting people with the tach scale (very big sized 0-100 part, so the arrow has to rotate faster ==> to make people think: "Wow, this thing goes!) :) I don't want to say that it's slow because 6,1 s aren't slow for such a heavy car, but it's still funny how they try to make it look faster than it is.
wow ....tak toto uz hej ...konecne nieco poriadne vymysleli snazia sa pomoct tdickarom bo su na tolko zufali ze hocijaky atmosferak ich fukne dole a oni pucia z turba co to len da :D ...tak konecne nieco poriadne vymysleli aj pre tdickarov ....ale taky 2.0 bi turbo benzin ta ma das 350-400hp bmw 3.0bi turbo je riadny nepodarok ked je slabsi ma menej koni a vecsiu spotrebu jak 3.0d ...top je benzin
0-100 is really good, but its only because the short gearbox as the most vw´s have, therefore 100-200 is really slow, my bmw 120d isnt much slower....and this with only 177 hp! Bad decision of VW not annying brother audi and keeping off the wonderful v6 TDI´s!
akoze, je to biturbo a stale sa tomu proste nechce ist do tych 200.. za mna jednoznacne benzin aj ked je toto naozaj pekne auto a dobre spracovane, aj ten zvuk bol celkom OK, ale.. nejde to tak ako by som si predstavoval
Gibt's das auch in schnell? Das Mäusekino ist ja total unübersichtlich und optisch ne glatte 6. hoffe andere Hersteller springen nicht auch noch auf den Zug auf :-/
The only mistake that Volkswagen did is gas pedal (accelerator).The gas pedal of this perfect car is very small so the only reason why I won't buy this perfect car.I can not understand why they did a big gas pedal for previous version even it was 105 hp.I would want VW could produce a big gas pedal and a more beatiful a gear type for this awasome car (at least for 240 hp passat).
na 2.0 tdi sice pěkné, ale podle mě to bude žrát jako benzín... tudíž to auto nemá opodstatnění... biturbo (jen důvod aby se srala další věc na autě)... a zrychlení ze 100-200 mám lepší já s CC 2.0 tdi 125kw ...
no to urcite mas lepsie z 100-200 na svojom jak toto :D ...sak ccko je vecsie tahsie ma menej koni a to az o dost a ten krutak ani nevravim ;) ..tak jak mozes mat lepsiu trakciu pri 100-200 :D .......mozno jedine dole kopcom :D
Wow, hatte VW schon 2015 Digitaltachos verbaut. Und den Abstands Assistent, das ist sehr fortschrittlich wenn man bedenkt das ein LKW erst 5 Jahre später damit ausgerüstet wurde, und in vielen Fahrzeugen heute noch nicht zur Verfügung steht.
Очень круто 👍 Добавьте мне пожалуйста 1,5млн.рублей. Я отдам свой Passat B5.5 AWT 1.8T отцу. Продадим его AUD100 MC 2.2T. И купим Passat B8. Прям мечтаю об этой тачке 🙏
Старт с ланча и примерно 7+ до 100 за эту цену и при этой мощности ну ничего удивительного. Главное почаще с ланча стартовать и будет боольшой привет коробасу. А так старт по людски с одной педали да и на нашей соляре в районе 8 с. Ничего особенного.
you need 10 seconds to stop when you are about 210 kmh, and when you see something seems really dangereous. Which exact mean is, no way you can prevent upcoming accident by not hitting anywhere while going that much high on the road. Which means you are fucked up. you died bro.
Quite interesting this digital dashboard, although I didn't understand most of it. Yes I would have very much appreciated if the language setting would have been set on ENGLISH god damn it!
Left side outer ring: revs inner ring: current consumption, with average inside the ring Below that current gear and gear recommendation, below that water temperature Right side outer ring: current speed Inner ring: current fuel in tank with rest kms to drive at current avg consumption inside Below that current speed in digits, below that fuel gauge Mind you you can adapt the inner circles to whatever information you want like compass current acceleration g-meter etc but you cannot switch the stuff thats under the rings (water temp and fuel gauge)
skip the bullshit part to 2:01
pretty good noise for a diesel
it's probably fake engine noise
0-100 7,3 sec (0-105)
100-200 is lot slower - its diesel, thats why - it rews till 4500 and gearchange so torque on the wheel drops dramatcally with every gear. If it petrol revs 6000-7000 and gear ratios are closer each over so that why petrols are quicker on high gears
That's not true. Especially at high speeds the turbodiesel pulls very good because of the torque. And since when does the torque drop dramatically with every gear in a turbodiesel car if the car is still in the optimal powerband rpm? Smh ...
I have a pathetic passat 130 TDI. I need this in my life , with vibrating lane assist
💋🎬🇬🇧♥️🚘
consuming 9.3 lt/100km ?? isnt it so much for a tdi ?
+Eren Alkan If car was driving like on video (acceleration tests) it isn't to much. With that type of driving it is easy make 15 l/100 on average
And how do you know how and for how long it was driven?
This engine would do a perfect Golf GTD ;)
It would be a beast
A polo GTD
@@Chris-hw4mq yea tge Cuna 184 Hp engine in a Polo and the cuaa 240 HP in a Golf gtd
@@sitech9261 Škoda Octavia RS 2litres TDI/TDI 4X4 avec adblue préparée : 237hp et 477NM et ça pousse FORT. 👍🤙😎
True
The acceleration starts at 2:00 ;)
0-100 is more than perfect
but to 200 is a bad suprise
what did you expect from 2 litre engine?
Its a diesel, lots of torque but low hp numbers.
Yeap it is 2.0 lt diesel but
With 240 hp and hell of torque
I am expecting 100-200 less around 16 sec.
Here around 20 sec very similiar with 1.6 lt turbo gasoline engines (180 hp)
As possible reasons 4x4 and estate extra weight could count
You are wrong. This is amazing result for the 2.0 diesel engine. And this onboard design is different than the other cars. And somethink more 0-100 and 100-260 has a same size so 0-100 is really feel faster.
TheFunkyair 0-200 speed isn't bad considering it's got AWD and only 7 gears. It needs more gears though, 7 for this amount of hp in such a small diesel engine isn't enough.
Toooo long introduction...dude! 2 minute of nothing. Annoying.
It's slow after 60km/h because the speedo scale is different compared to 0-60 - so it creates an optical illusion that it's super faste up to 100km/h but very slow from there on.
+Toni Tvrdi
where did you get that from
Roland Lind Perhaps you could look at the gauges yourself and you will see?
+Toni Tvrdi I also noticed that.
Nope, each km/h marker is 20 km/h apart from 0 all the way to 260 km/h. On some Volkswagen and Audi cars it changes to bigger intervals, but not this one. It definitely doesn't look slow though.
GyroPyro12 Are you blind or something? Look carefully, the bigger interval goes from: 0-20, 20-40, 40-60 (that means all are 20km/h apart) then it changes to 40km/h for bigger intervals on the SAME scale: 60-100, 100-140....etc.
Delete the First 2 mins of this Video !
Go to 2:00 for the accleration
Alexander Rom gracias !!
Not bad but i expected more performance for a 240 hp d. engine
For a car with 4 wheel drive and that weights so much? lol... You expect too much... :)
maybe it has 240 to the crank not the wheel idk just saying
@@STR1XDLB from factory the hp is always at the crank. Never the wheel. Also it weighs 1635 kg and its a 4 cilinder(stock) with a chip tune this thing goes to 300 hp :)
@@Nightmare-FN I m pretty sure that weight is without Fuel ad blue oil driver a fire extinguisher in the trunk
@@STR1XDLB for sure
Great engine, good sound for a 4 cylinder!
There's nothing sexier than a proper analog speedometer
That is a silly joke.
Too bad Vw's analog speedometers look like cheap shit...
Excactly. That one in the video has to be the most ugliest speedo I've seen so far
americanstylefreak it is a matter pf taste, however I am too a big fan of the classic, i own e39 and i love the design
in a few years we'll need an engineer to tell if the video was recorded from an actual car or a PlayStation...
this is no playstation. You dont have all those menu options in a game
that speedometer looks so good!
2:02 start
This shit is fake it accelerate from 0-100 km/h in like 3 sec, lmbo or ferrari can barely do that and this is a 2 liter diesel car smfh
learn to count, is from 2.02 to 2.08 about...around 6 seconds...
+claudio carrasco are u blind or u r just naturally stupid? I said "in like" its obviously that u are stupid cuz u dont know what that word means.
+Robert Sandifer in Europe we use KMH not MPH, so 60 is KM not Miles and you have to count a little bit more till 100, got it? ;)
+Robert Sandifer so how did you count 3 sec to 100? can you count? have u been at school? or u are just stupid since you r born?
It takes 6 seconds on the video.
Fuel consumption is like a 3.0 engine :(
A. RzNN1 no its not in reality.. you cant judge a number if you dont know how it was driven on that run
Some people say that the new dashboard is Not nice,but I like it!
Close to 30 seconds - about the same to 200 km/h as my 1993 190hp Corrado.
stoneeh flooring is not everything. a 3.0 bitdi with same amout of power on a6 handles it in 20 seconds, a friend tested it. 2.0 bitdi is a bit of a waste. you get 2.0 tdi for fuel consumption with decent power. if you want a fast car and decent fuel consumption, 3 little bitdi is the way to go
@stoneeh: Corrado is light and has small and light wheels. Also, I think it will pull a bit on the Corrado anyway. So no, it is not as fast as the 190 hp Corrado, it is a bit faster.
W tym pasku jest dłuższa procedura startu niż w samolocie
Wcale nie, wyłączasz kontrole trakcji, skrzynia w sport i jedziesz.
2:01 For people who don't want to wait so long
Thank you. Shit vid
Acceleration Waiting Waiting Waiting Waitingg WTF 2:00 Acceleration why waiting 120 second
This is how you break a car down in a view Months
oh my god. the engine was nearly brandnew and not even warm. :(
chceck the video when they start pushing it it was 90degres
thats the water and not the OIL!!!!!!!!!
If the water just got 90 the oil is not even close to warm :0
Easy Playing You can see 21:14 on the dashboard, the water is almost 90 degrees. The full acceleration was at 22:15 as you can see. So nothing to worry about. :-) And the amount of km's you see is from trip, which you can reset, most of the time these cars have driven 5000km already. Have a nice day :)
You´re right but take it easy - because of such people car repair shops do have business. If everybody knew how to treat his car properly it would mean a lot of lost jobs. Still frightening though that there really are people who think that one minute might be enough to warm up a car. For the ones who don´t want to ruin their diesel: between 0 - 20 degrees C you need to drive at least 12 - 15 km before you can hit the gas. Under zero degrees it can take as long as 20 km driving in the mid rev range. And don´t leave the engine running too long before you start driving - it´s a myth that you do your car good. the oil pump doesn´t like that at all, neither does the engine. The best you can do is start driving immediately in the mid rev range and after warming up the water wait at least another 5 minutes or 10 km before hitting the gas hard. I don´t tell anybody to listen to my advice. If you can afford a new engine, kill your current one. It might be instantaneous or take a long time - but it will come.
It was warm enough. And besides, a modern engine can cope. Having said that I still prefer to wait till everything is up to temperature before driving hard.
Sa to rozbieha pol dna na to ze to ma 240 koni :D som cakal ze ot bude tahat trosku lepsie
instruments looks fancier than the acceleration..
I would love to see the oil consumption of this engine
10Litres in 5 minutes of course
Kluci, docela by bodlo, kdybyste nekam napsali (do popisu videa nebo aspon clanku, na ktery odkazujete), za kolik to udelalo kilo a dve kila (skutecne km/h - zadne "rychlomerove zazraky"). Tady to vypada na cca 7,3 s 0-100 (od trhnuti na startu az po rucicku rychlomeru jakoby na 105 km/h) a cca 31 s 0-199 (rucicka cca na 209), pokud bychom brali pridavani rychlomeru 5 %. To tedy znamena 100-200 za cca 24 s, coz sice neni spatne, ale zase na danou moderni technologii (dve turba, DSG, 7 stupnu), cenu, vykon, kroutak, hmotnost, spotrebu, zvuk atd. zadny zazrak. Protoze ty hodnoty zrychleni jsou podezrele spatne (vyrobce uvadi kilo za 6,1), je mozne, ze jste jeli do mirneho kopce (subjektivne treba temer neznatelneho) nebo (kvuli danym gumam atd.) rychlomer pridava podstatne mene nez 5 %.
Souhlasím s tebou. Z 0-100 to má slušnou akceleraci, avšak nad 130 žádný zázrak.
@@sinjakupre Presne tak naháňal som sa z jedným do kopca a nič moc a to mám octáviu 1.9 tdi 77kw :)
very ugly, artificial looking clocks, very odd diesel sound, it is also these sound generator or? and for 240 ps very average acceleration, is it still best in class? oh I forgot, one of the ugliest cars in its class. another odd vw, buy Mazda 6 or something much better then this shit.
0-200 29sec is decent for a familie car. But it is stil a Way overrated VW. Everything from vag is overpriced shit that breaksdown.
Kurwa steruje 4 minuty
Wow what a braking test... Why would you do that for fucks sake!!
Why would you not? Nothing is more important than that. Jesus..
Спасибо, за видео. Очень интересно. Но в России Шкода пользуется большим спросом. Дешевле ). Еще раз спасибо.
wow, holds gears really impressivly for a diesel engine
Hurry the fuck up and drive the car
7.5 sec real gps tacho lyes 5 km...
ℹ Here are the acceleration times:
0-60 mph → 6.0 s
0-100 km/h → 6.3 s
0-100 mph → 15.7 s
0-200 km/h → 27.3 s
Top speed reached: 207 km/h (129 mph) at 31.4 s and hard braking from this speed to 0 at 6.7 s
This is very bad for 240ks. My 170ks tdi has almost same time after 100kmh
Slowly 😒😒😒 i wonder 2.0d 150hp what can do if 240hp is so slowly
most interesting moment 2:03 . Dont waste your time (~_o)
Very slow after 100 kmh ... maybe its because of the 4x4 and the extra weight ...
NikuCN not being smart but its a Passat there only made for one reason only,cheap road tax,good resale value,long service intervals.a Passat is all about cheap running costs not how slow it takes to get to 100,just like all cars nowadays its all about low emissions,low tax ,low running costs,nobody wants speed anymore those days are gone. Diesels will be winding up over the next few years as petrol/electric take over and finally electric take over for good until the next big thing is invented .as of right now if we lived in france we would be offered money to scrap our diesel cars and replace them with electric,the sooner electric comes in the better,,,super low runnings costs almost no maintenance,no more servicing as electric motors could last the life of the car,new batteries have already been invented that are way better than all that have gone before and charge in mins.it is very likely our children will now nothing only electric cars.the sooner the better.
tohle auto se prostě povedlo je to raketa hned bych ho koupil škoda že výbava co bych já chtěl výjde na 1 245 000 mít ty peníze hned pro něj jedu
Meanwhile north america gets the crap bloated B7 NA Passat....
Good, but do this with car, witch has cold water and cold oil, it is not good .
0-100km/h 6 seconds 100-200km/h forever
2:00 yw
Si qier3s ponlo desde que compraste el auto
this engine is not good for Passat and it will be better that Passat have same engine like new Audi A4 have!! Audi A4 have 3.0 TDI 272hp which got 1-1,2 sec better acceleration and less fuel consumption than this 2 liter engine from Passat!!
you're kids arguing over who's got the fastest bicycle. Can you say Chevrolet 437 L88. Advertised at 435 HP, but they were lying. They dynoed over 550 HP. Almost 1.3 hp per CI without fuel injection or overhead cams, or computers.
engine wasn't warm enough to perform such test... bad
engine had 90 degrees...... is that not enough in your opinion ? :D I think 90-100 is the ideal temperature, more than that is not good
Verdaderamente es el coche definitivo para mi parecer
This Car weighs 1,9 tons and had only a 2 Liter Diesel Engine!!! What do you all expect from such a heavy Car??? Buy a petrol Engine....
Ah, I see VAG is still bullshitting people with the tach scale (very big sized 0-100 part, so the arrow has to rotate faster ==> to make people think: "Wow, this thing goes!) :) I don't want to say that it's slow because 6,1 s aren't slow for such a heavy car, but it's still funny how they try to make it look faster than it is.
Why is the acceleration from 100 to 200 so bad?
Passerati xD
No
Zrychlení pěkné, ale zvuk je hrozný... Zlaté šestiválce.
wow ....tak toto uz hej ...konecne nieco poriadne vymysleli snazia sa pomoct tdickarom bo su na tolko zufali ze hocijaky atmosferak ich fukne dole a oni pucia z turba co to len da :D ...tak konecne nieco poriadne vymysleli aj pre tdickarov ....ale taky 2.0 bi turbo benzin ta ma das 350-400hp bmw 3.0bi turbo je riadny nepodarok ked je slabsi ma menej koni a vecsiu spotrebu jak 3.0d ...top je benzin
0-100 is really good, but its only because the short gearbox as the most vw´s have, therefore 100-200 is really slow, my bmw 120d isnt much slower....and this with only 177 hp!
Bad decision of VW not annying brother audi and keeping off the wonderful v6 TDI´s!
Me prijdou ty budiky dost neprehledny...na můj vkus tedy
that stopping power wow
Brake disc and pads for grabage now 😂
not bad for a VW
Paolo wolfart castillo trust me they made great cars ppl despite them cuz they're cheap
boooooooooring
Why Do not Audi use this Engine in any of those models? That is a great question my Dear Wattson
Na 240 koní žádný excelentní zázrak.
Wtf. Looks like a video game. I hope most cars still coming with a real dashboard...
It's not faster as my 2015er Mazda 6 with 185 hp diesel
I expected it is faster. My bimmer 3.0d e46 from 100 to 200 is way faster
akoze, je to biturbo a stale sa tomu proste nechce ist do tych 200.. za mna jednoznacne benzin aj ked je toto naozaj pekne auto a dobre spracovane, aj ten zvuk bol celkom OK, ale.. nejde to tak ako by som si predstavoval
anybody no how I can get a replacement the hold thing tho n wats the name so I can find the price plz n think you
My Octavia from 2008 can that to, and consumes only 5 liters per 100km
good acceleration from 0 to 100km/u, but above 100km/u the acceleration is nothing for a 240 horsepower biturbo engine
Medio vídeo jugando con el tablero
Verry good sound engine. This is 2.0 TDI but nice sound.
Very Powerful I think Audi should BiTurbo it's 2.0 TDI.
i think maby its more than 240 hp, more like 250-255 hp in engine.
Gibt's das auch in schnell? Das Mäusekino ist ja total unübersichtlich und optisch ne glatte 6. hoffe andere Hersteller springen nicht auch noch auf den Zug auf :-/
The only mistake that Volkswagen did is gas pedal (accelerator).The gas pedal of this perfect car is very small so the only reason why I won't buy this perfect car.I can not understand why they did a big gas pedal for previous version even it was 105 hp.I would want VW could produce a big gas pedal and a more beatiful a gear type for this awasome car (at least for 240 hp passat).
Would you like to buy the gas pedal from my old 105 hp passat? Would that make you happy? XD
na 2.0 tdi sice pěkné, ale podle mě to bude žrát jako benzín... tudíž to auto nemá opodstatnění... biturbo (jen důvod aby se srala další věc na autě)... a zrychlení ze 100-200 mám lepší já s CC 2.0 tdi 125kw ...
no to urcite mas lepsie z 100-200 na svojom jak toto :D ...sak ccko je vecsie tahsie ma menej koni a to az o dost a ten krutak ani nevravim ;) ..tak jak mozes mat lepsiu trakciu pri 100-200 :D .......mozno jedine dole kopcom :D
Wow, hatte VW schon 2015 Digitaltachos verbaut. Und den Abstands Assistent, das ist sehr fortschrittlich wenn man bedenkt das ein LKW erst 5 Jahre später damit ausgerüstet wurde, und in vielen Fahrzeugen heute noch nicht zur Verfügung steht.
skip to 2:00
je to super video! davam like!
For 1735 kg she is moving good, and the BRAKES are great😃
Showing how the Insignia bi turbo should accelerate .
7s 0-100 and 30s 0-200, really impressive for a simple 2.0 diesel saloon
no papa el past cc 3.6 300 cv lo corta x la mitad el nuevo pasat no le yega ni a los talones
Очень круто 👍
Добавьте мне пожалуйста 1,5млн.рублей.
Я отдам свой Passat B5.5 AWT 1.8T отцу.
Продадим его AUD100 MC 2.2T.
И купим Passat B8.
Прям мечтаю об этой тачке 🙏
Нет, сам заработай
My e350 cdi will crush it
it not impresive ... i 4500 R/M=200KM/H
+Alex PRO Secuted that's the 6 gear,it has 7.
Старт с ланча и примерно 7+ до 100 за эту цену и при этой мощности ну ничего удивительного. Главное почаще с ланча стартовать и будет боольшой привет коробасу.
А так старт по людски с одной педали да и на нашей соляре в районе 8 с. Ничего особенного.
wtf what is it 'BiTDI' Turbo diesel with .... ??
Jarosław Psikuta it has two turbos man.
блин, он разгоняется 2.45.... у меня столько времени нет на поездку
The 100-200 seems very slow...
Because The engine is Diesel
and a really cute engine block, no wonder
it is fast from 0-70... but then it literally almost stops... it's slow
from 580km range to 360km range hehe.
Look at fuel level and trip km....
you need 10 seconds to stop when you are about 210 kmh, and when you see something seems really dangereous. Which exact mean is, no way you can prevent upcoming accident by not hitting anywhere while going that much high on the road. Which means you are fucked up. you died bro.
He needs about 5s to get 200 to 0. About 1g of breaking, not that much, a sport car can do 2g, or more
+Adricol0 are you idiot ? Count it again how many seconds it takes to stop. You fucking idiot
+rapgame61 braking : 2:35-2:40 about 5sec...
+Adricol0 true. It's my fault
i like how you admitted it and yet you called him a fucking idiot before.
Z troj-minutoveho videa skoro su dve minuty len o tom ako si nastavuje rezim to naco co pi...
You need 1 min just to start the dash... Slow car..
Quite interesting this digital dashboard, although I didn't understand most of it. Yes I would have very much appreciated if the language setting would have been set on ENGLISH god damn it!
Left side outer ring: revs inner ring: current consumption, with average inside the ring
Below that current gear and gear recommendation, below that water temperature
Right side outer ring: current speed
Inner ring: current fuel in tank with rest kms to drive at current avg consumption inside
Below that current speed in digits, below that fuel gauge
Mind you you can adapt the inner circles to whatever information you want like compass current acceleration g-meter etc but you cannot switch the stuff thats under the rings (water temp and fuel gauge)