Main reason most havent bought the 2.8 yet is because generally, the F4 is fine and if youre gonna drop the 2k on a Z mount lens it should be for the 70-200......whenever that day comes
I'm definitely in that boat. Nikon had announced that they were going to launch the 70-200mm f/2.8 S before the end of the year (2019), but slim chance of that happening now. I feel like 70-200 is a much better zoom range and who knows how much it's going to cost.
@@darekm6859 for sure not but if your focus is on landscape and not that much on portraits where you gonna need the f2.8 to get nice bookeh, you'll be fine with the f4
Hands down the best review and comparison of these lenses. Great presentation, no filler, to the point, and all the points were useful and what I was looking for. Thank you!
Nikon's designers did something right with the Z cameras. The Z6 and Z7 feel so good in the hand, it's amazing. I tried the Z6 with the 24-70 f2.8 and it felt surprisingly good, even though I'm primarily a Leica M and Panasonic GH shooter for stills and video respectively. Based on feel alone, I can imagine using this camera with a lot of pleasure.
This was an excellent and instructive video. You get to the point straight away, no self-aggrandizement or filler - no time wasted, just good information.
I use a f/2.8 and don't mind the extra weight. I got so used to it, I don't even feel it anymore. It's always nice having that extra stop when you need it.
I bought my Z6 as a kit with the F4. It is a great lens. But I couldn't believe how much sharper the F/2.8 was. Also I wanted to shoot astrophotography and so I coughed up the money for the F/2.8. I have not been disappointed.
I can not say the same, Just bought the 2.8 and it has an absolutely magic to it in terms you carry the best these is BUT I think the f4 will do the same job for me especially when using high f stops.
It really depends on your type of photography. For landscapes, which is what I'm doing, the f4 is the lens I would go for. It's light and smaller and the image quality is just as good. Ricci Talks has compared the two lenses and zooming in at 2:1 there is a slight difference in sharpness. But no one will ever notice that unless you print very, very, very, very large. All of this is not a concern yet for me because I still shoot DSLR... yes I love my D850 :-)
I stumbled upon your video when searching RUclips for videos about the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 that I'd just purchased. The f/2.8 aperture is a must for my type of photography, shooting concert in low light situations.
Jeezus, this new lens on that Z is such a work of art. I know everyone is nuts about SONY, but aesthetically and ergonomically these Nikons are in a different league!!
These new nikons are all rip-offs. Seriously, all that plastic for all those $$$?! I shoot plenty of nikon pro lenses and have fluffed around with the z-mount ones, but am not even going to consider getting them unless nikon tosses them to me for free (which they won't, particularly after I blasted the 24-70 kit lens NPS gave me on loan previously). The light weight is nice though.
@@grootbatavia I know this replay is kinda late but dude, it doesn't need to be made from metal to be good. Older 24-70 2.8G have problem with zoom. A lot of people complain that the zoom is not smooth and got stuck eventually. Mine from time to time especially in rainy days at events, zoom was not very smooth. Other days was fine. Now i'm using 2.8S and is lighter, a little bit compact and has a better performance.
@@GeorgeUrsan good morning George, I'm not knocking optical performance, 8 know it's good. That said, I like lenses that feel like they are build to last. A lot of my work is in remote locations and I can not afford to have something go bad. Once my 300mm 4 pf went out in the bush and it took NPS over the weeks to get me a replacement.
@@grootbatavia Of course it needs to be reliable as far as build quality, but like i said, G version is prone to go bad because of stuck zoom ring. it only needs a small hit in the front, that's why i thought. Anyway that's my opinion. I'm just trying to spread my experience with the Z.
I just purchased the 24-70 f2.8 S lens this afternoon as well as the 14-24 f2.8 S lens. Thank you for your thoughtful review. It has confirmed my decision.
I appreciate your thoughts on this lens. I already own the f/4 S lens, but still ponder buying the 2.8 S and taking the $$$ hit--even after watching this video several times! Leigh, I'll probably view it again before making up my mind. Thank you for your considerable insights.
Great review, thank you, Leigh! I have the 2.8 on a Z6. It’s perfect for all the situations I find myself in with portraits, events and corporate head shots. I don’t usually have the space to use a 70-200, but if I do I’ll use my fav (older) 80-200 2.8 on my D750. But that’s rare since I’ve been shooting the 24-70 2.8. It’s addicting. No regrets on the cost, it’s paid for itself many times over.
RUclips recommendation brought me here, thankfully. I'm thinking of switching from APS-C Sony to Nikon and your review brings me closer to Nikon. Subscribed. Keep up the good work.
Ironically, I just bought the Sony 24-70mm 2.8 G-master lens earlier today, and then I find this video. I've been a "prime lenses only" kinda guy for a while, but I started shooting concerts / live music events and I'm getting tired of changing lens one-handedly in dark venues. 2 minutes into playing with the lens, I was already happy with my purchase. The AF speed is far faster than the wide-aperture primes I had been shooting with on my a7RIII.
I myself am actually using the new Tamron G2 lenses with the Z6 with great results. Not to mention that the price is right. Got the tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2 for about $1300, which is half of the price of the equivalent nikon F lens, with no real difference in quality (unless you are a serious pixel peeper). Now Z mount lenses might be a different story, but it has yet to be released so :) Tamron is a good 3rd party alternative if you want to save some bucks. NOTE: not all tamron lenses have compatibility with the Z cameras. And those who do, need a firmware update (tap-in module) before they work 100%. If you're a manual shooter you shouldn't have any troubles either way.
24-70/2.8 S must be an excellent lens but frightfully expensive. I am more than Happy with f 4 lens. I would have liked a 24-120 / f 4 S lens from Nikon. Would have fulfilled most of the photography & VDO requirements without changing the lens & exposing the sensor to dust & dirt. To me Nikon is safe guarding their own DSLR camera & lenses against Mirrorless.
Wow, the best video you’ve yet produced, professional, informative, succinct, interesting, and superlative photos. Beyond that I’ve never seen you look more peaceful, relaxed, beautiful. Bravo young lady, well done for certain. Cheers.
Hi, I see that this review was completed a number of years ago. Regardless, although I was a Nikon shooter for many, many years, I did leave in 2015 for M4/3rds and Panasonic Lumix. I'm more or else back with the new Z6II and Z7II, but both camera kits camer with the 24-70 F4. Yes, I still have all my Nikkor F mount lenses, but slowly I want to have more Z mount lenses. Your review was very interesting and helpful to me. The years that have past since thus review was completed do not mean anything as the facts you offer are the same. I will eventually purchase the 24-70 F2.8 as well as the 70-200 F2.8 and an extender. Your photos of Bryce Canyon (I think) are beautuful as well as Zion (I assume). Your approach to making your informative reviews is very much appreciated. When I do decide to buy the 2.8 version, you'll get my vote through Amazon. Great work. Thanks! 📷 🙏 👍 😃 🤩
Your speaking is one of the best i have heard , besides the information , your talk is precise and clear , which is lacking in some other you tube videos . you keep the viewer engaged very well due to this fact . greetings from down under .
I mainly purchased my 24-70 2.8 because I wanted the extra stop for low-light shooting, and because it does edge out the f/4 lens in the corners on high-res bodies like the Z7. It was a big upgrade, but I'm glad I did it (sold the f/4 lens for about $450 and luckily I got the 2.8 version while it was on sale last year for about $300 off, so $2000). For me, I like the LCD on the lens, partially because it gives you a focus scale (the one in-camera is not very useful) and if I want to shoot at a specific FL, I don't have to guess. I've found on some lenses that sometimes, for example, 50mm is not directly at 50mm and might be a hair to the left or right of the marking. Granted I don't go nuts about this, but if someone wanted to get, say, a 35mm shot, it's easier with the window to make sure that you're are spot on at 35mm. But again, yes, the focus scale can be helpful either for landscape or astrophotography. The f/4 is a decent lens for what it is, and for probably 3/4 of the people who buy it, it will be fine.
The F2.8S lens definetly shines in low light. As a videographer I use the 24-70 F2.8 lens during the dinner & speeches of the wedding ceremony then I change over to the 14-24 F2.8 lens during the opne dance portion of the wedding ceremony to capture really great footage in extremely low light.
Thanks for your thoughts on the 24-70. When I purchased my Z cameras it included a 24-70 f/4 then later I picked up the 24-70 f/2.8 S. I originally thought I would sell my f/4 S lens but now I decided to keep both. I love taking the f/4 out when I do not wish to be burdened by the weight. I sold my legacy f mount 24-70 f/2.8 lens.
In the photo sequence near the end, there are some errors in reported settings. At least one shot said it was F/2, another said 7mm, another was at ISO 6. I dont think the lens/camera can achieve those values.
I got the 2.8 version because I will be travelling with it and didn’t want to switch lenses but still wanted to have a reasonably bright lens. For normal use, I think the f4 version + 1 or 2 f1.8 primes is a better solution.
My main justification for the new f2.8 lens would be for event / conference photography where light is low and shutter speeds can’t go too low on people. But having the latest G version makes the expense of the S lens very hard to accept, especially as I have the f4 S lens. Maybe something for the future
It's just simply too expensive right now. I have the same issue as you, but if it were half the price I'd be on it. I need my f4 for street stuff and everyday carrying. I love that little lens so much.
Thank you for this very informative comparison. I have the f4 S version, but I don't think I'll be pulling the trigger on the 2.8 as I don't need the wider aperture, or the extra size and weight. Like you, I don't much care for carrying around my 2.8G lens. I'd really love Nikon to bring out the 70-200 mm f4 S, as that would make a great landscape and portrait lens. Is that a new hairstyle? I love it. As a long-term follower of your channel, I think you (and Raymond) get better looking as time goes by.
I'm coming from the Fuji Line which was a 24mb system. While going to the Z system I was trying to keep my lense inventory to a minimum. I do NOT produce large prints, and actually most of my pics go into either books or social media. I've found that the z 24-70mm f2.8 produce 98 percent of the shots that I need. I might be a little spoiled not have a 90mm for portraits, but going from 24mb to 45 plus - I have ample room for cropping. I've been with the Z system for almost a year now, and the only other lense that I have is the z 35mm f1.8. This would be my street, low light, indoor lense. I'm happy with the hole system. Looking forward to try out either lense with some astrophotos this upcoming November. Keep up the good work, I enjoy watching the experiences that you are sharing.
Thanks for taking the time to do this. I’ve been on the fence about which way to go here, Z6 with the f4 kit, or just the body and the 2.8. You gave me some solid info as well as practical application examples. Loved it and subscribed.
I own a 24-70 f2.8S and was hesitant before buying it but it turned out to be the best decision... The quality is phenomenal and you dont need to take it off its a perfect all rounder...
Another good unbiased video. Like you I have all three lens and really like them all. Since I’m still shooting my D850 and 810 along with my Z6 my F mount 2.8 is still a staple in my kit and is amazing. The F4 S lens is great for personal, causal shooting and run and gun work, you just can’t beat the size and weight. The new 2.8 S lens is superb, I use this for all my professional video work and photos shoots on the Z6, my photo shoot kit now consists of the Z6 with then 2.8 S lens and the D850 with a 70-200 2.8 F lens. I’m really looking forward to the 70-200 2.8 S and the high end Z body when they are released. Again thanks for the good review 😊📷👍🏾
I absolutely love the way that you present content. You have a very unique style that's just so friendly, refreshing and draws me right in. The videos just seem so warm and interesting. I could watch them for hours :D
It was expensive, but I followed my instinct to never buy a body with kit lens. I waited and added a 2.8 S lens to my Z6 body as soon as it was available. I tried video early on with the FTZ and my 50mm 1.4G lens. The noise made this setup unusable. The 2.8 S lens is fantastic and I will never look back.
Thank you so much for this review. After I watched the part where you are showing how smoothly and noiselessly focus works, I decided to buy the lens. It really is an amazing piece of glass. Keep up the good work!
An excellent review! You get to the tradeoffs between lenses that are just what I have been agonizing about since the 24-70 f/2.8 came out. I'm still on the edge but teetering toward the 2.8. Thanks!?
Video helps a bit, particularly those who don't have a full set of FX lenses and are transitioning from Nikon DSLR, or those just looking to buy a Z body factoring in whether to buy the F4 kit for an extra $600, or to just use that towards the $2,300 F2.8. Definitely the 24-70mm of choice, but that additional $1,700 is a tough sell for anyone who isn't using it for professional work.
As a lens in the kit, for $600 it is a bargain and can be sold later for that once the kit discount goes way. I really enjoy my f/4 and its performance compared to the G and E 2.8 F mounts I have. For the weight, size and optical performance it is hard to beat at that price. My walking around sling bag has a SB900, Z6, 24-70 f/4 and a prime, depended on where I am going...50 1.8 S(Sharpest lens I have ever used) or my smallest 85 which is the 1.8G. For paid work I am still using mostly F lenses but saving for the Z mount 70-200 2.8 S that is due this fall. By that time I will add the Z7 to replace the D850 for high res work. Everything that does not need those file sizes is shot with the Z6.
Curious to see what the kit lens will be going for as more Z users sell them. The notion that most Z users will eventually buy the F2.8 seems unlikely, given the price/target market. Although with a $1,000 MSRP, it's hard to imagine a used sample going for much less than the original add on cost of $600, assuming in like-new condition. Performance-wise, the DXO tests place it on par with the 2.8 F mount lenses, likely due to the reduced flange distance, redesigned elements, new coatings, etc. Pretty impressive for a kit lens although how much of that has to do with the inherent advantages of the larger mount diameter and reduced back element/sensor distance one has to wonder. Between that the the noise of the AF-S motors, about the only thing the old F glass has going for it as adapted lenses is the build quality. One stop of light alone doesn't really merit going the adapted route although everyone has their priorities.
When doing architecture or landscape shootings my 24-70 F4 is Perfect. For Portraits I use the 50 mm F 1,8 which gives a nice bokeh. I am still waiting for the 85mm F1;8. Thx for your good Video, your nice smile and clear pronounciation which made it easy to Unterstand you very well. Martin living in Germany. 😀👍
That 2.8 is like one of the sharpest lens I’ve ever seen tested, however I’d prefer the 15-30 if this was a kit option, I dont know why but I love shooting 15,16,17m.... but the f4 would fit 80% of most enthusiasts. And now the Z deals come with the ftz adapter. Just borrow or get a prime for portraits or Astro.
I’m glad you mentioned the focus issue with the G lens. I shot an event over the weekend with the Z6 and the adapted G. I definitely noticed soft focus. It was aggravating.
Great video. I just bought a Nikon Z6 with the 24-70mm f/2.8 S with the 3.o software version.It's fantastic. Question: Which settings are you using when you do the noiseless test where you disappear and the focus automatically comes back to normal when you reappear? I know it's basic but I'd love to know exactly which setting it is. Thank You so much. I love your videos.
one tip, if you want VR in this focal range use the 24-85 VR 3.5-4.5 lens, it's got a variable max aperture; However it has VR, so can add this to the body VR as you say in the video.
Although I have a significant degree of GAS, I'm sticking with the Z 24-70 f/4.0 S on my Z6 for two reasons. First and most persuasive is the price. It just seems so out of balance with anything I would do with the lens. Second, after extensive outings with the Z 35mm f/1.8 S, I find that shallow depth of field is actually often a problem for me in that I want more of the frame in focus by default, and so if I am going to stop down to 4.0 or narrower, what's the point? The f/4.0 does that, of course, by default, and I have no problem shooting wide open with that lens. I do carry the Z 35mm f/1.8 S (and sometimes also the 50mm f/1.8 G with the FTZ adaptor). I have also found that with the IBIS in the Z6, in all but the darkest situations I can handhold the camera and get acceptable results with F mount f/3.5 to 5.6 lenses on the FTZ adaptor, and certainly with the 50mm f/1.8 G. But still, it's definitely the price that keeps me on the sidelines of the f/2.8, so thanks for your report of your experiences with it.
When photographing aurora borealis I try to use as short speed as possible.. between 1-6 sec`s, and for that to work I need a faster lens. This way I can keep the iso lower! I have got all 3 lenses and love the new f2.8 S!
God your review was so refreshing. Very elaborate and addressed pretty much every thing I could think of. Great examples, and beautiful shots. Really helpful
Appreciate your review of these lenses! Nicely done. At 8:06 you mentioned the use of the FTZ adapter with the G lens reduces the Z6 to only use PDAF for focusing. I have been unable to find any source for that comment and was hoping you could point me in the right direction. Your comment sounds counterintuitive because all focusing is accomplished on the Z sensor so the FTZ adapter should have no influence.
Thanks for this, a well thought out take on the comparison. I’m going to trade my f-mount lens against one, mainly because I’m being asked to shoot more and more video now. The silent focusing is the key. I’ve also seen a technical review comparing it to the 24mm f1.8 and the 24-70 S was sharper when wide open
I'm new to photography as a serious hobby and have chosen the Panasonic FZ1000 as my camera of choice, the 4k video is for wildlife, what tips could you offer for my other interest, landscapes, in particular the longer exposure shots, are these type of shots possible with my equipment, I am looking at various filters and other you tubers for info. Can't find anything about the FZ1000 on your channel yet or is it there and i've missed it. Great channel and thanks for all the tips i've gleaned so far.
Love the 24-70mm lens, although my budget only allowed for me to get the cheaper Tamron :) Great all around lens to go along with my Nikon nifty 50mm 1.8 lens, and I feel prepared for almost all shooting conditions! Thanks for this video!...
The 2.8 S is more than the G version I bought 5 years ago by only $300 but a lot lower than the E version I bought 1 year ago. In store testing of the S lens, with open and looking at the corners really impressed me. But I just sold my D850 and will use that money for a Z7 to compliment my 6 month old Z6 that is so much fun to use, plus is an effective replacement for the D850 for all but the most demanding art director who insists on large files. EVERYthing else is handled by the Z6 with ease. The noise of the G version F mount was never noticed until used on the Z6, it stays busy all the time and surely negatively impacts battery life. My E version was more expensive and I don't see any optical advantage except VR. It is probably the only lens I was expecting more from. I still have my D800 which is now second camera in shoots so when the Z7 arrives, I can start selling off the F mount lenses that have FL covered by S lenses. All the 24-70 Nikkors are good and rugged workhorses but the S f/4 and f/2.8 are better, particularly wide open in the corners. All these considerations get more complicated when seeing that the 70-200 2.8 S is due this fall and to me that is more important to invest in. I have many primes in the mid range, including the excellent 50 1.8 S so the 24-70 2.8 S is not essential. The f/4 is pretty darn good and would be enough if I could only have one. Thanks for the information about focusing modes. I did not realize the F mounts only use Phase Detection
Just for clarification, using the “Pinpoint” single focusing square invokes Contrast Detect Auto Focus (CDAF) with both native S-Mount lenses as well as F-Mount lenses coupled with the FTZ adapter. Using the “Pinpoint” AF square removes the option for Phase Detect Auto Focus (PDAF) from the Z cameras. I am in the process of copying my archive of 49 years of slides using the Nikon 60mm f/2.8G Micro NIKKOR lens, the FTZ Adapter and the Nikon ES-2 film Digitizing Adapter. I am using the “Pinpoint” AF point to maximize focus accuracy by having the camera focus on the surface of the slide film using CDAF. As we know, CDAF is slower but more accurate than PDAF. At a 1:1 magnification, focus accuracy is critical, hence the need for CDAF.
Thank you for making this video!!! This is exactly the information I was looking for. I'm happy keeping my old fmount 24-70 2.8 for the wider aperture and the kit lens for weight benefits and convenience.
Having the 2.8 is so nice and gives you a bit more flexibility. The first lens I bought was a Sigma 2.8 17-70 to replace my 18-55 kit. The Nikkor 18-55 kit isn't bad, but once I felt I had somewhat mastered it, I wanted something that gave me a bit more flexibility and better images. Really enjoy how versatile it is. I actually don't mind a heavier lens because I'm a bit odd and equate more weight with better stability.
Both the f/4 and the f/2.8 have quite non-linear vignetting in the corners. Not a problem due to in-camera correction - unless you have the slimmest of filters on the lens. Then, 24mm and 70mm become unusable at f/4 for certain shots, unless you want to spend lots of time calibrating layers of radial masks on top of your image. With the f/2.8 lens, that kind of vignetting is still present at f/2.8, but it usually does not matter for images taken at f/2.8. At f/4, things are much improved, and the issue disappears at f/5.6 (when you often have the best combination of sharpness and depth of field for landscapes).
Brilliant video, during your main commentary video in the woods you was using the f2.8 lens to show depth of field, could you show a comparison at f4 to show the difference even the same lens at f4. I can not justify the cost of the f2.8. Thanks a lot.
Thanks for your smart, balanced, frank review, with your lovely images. I was most interested you didn't see much of an IQ improvement in the f2.8 S over the f4 kit zoom. They both seem like fantastic lenses for the Z's--nice to have a choice for different uses.
This was once again an informative review. That's what I like you for. The 24-70 f/2.8 is a great piece of pure joy. I love it and your reports. Please more of it. great from Berlin Frank
Thank you for the video! The 4/24-70 mil would be enough for me, because if I need the extra light gathering ability and potential to isolate my subject from the background, I prefer prime lenses. However the Z mount lenses seem to have benefits in autofocus accuracy and speed over the FTZ adapted lenses.
The picture quality on this video is stunning, the audio not so much. I don't mean to be offensive, I intend this comment to be constructive criticism.
Hi Leigh, I always enjoy your videos. You do a wonderful job and I trust what you say! You come across as being very sincere, unbiased, professional and conscientious. Great channel! I believe that the amount of Axis stabilization is only 3 when you mount an F mount lens, with VR, to the Z camera body. I think the only time you get 5 Axis is with a native S lens. Thanks again for your content! Best to you, Rick
minecraftdaltons hi, thanks for the reply😊. I’ve used f mount vr lenses with the Z7 and while the vr does work I find it much better with the native S lenses. Take care, Rick
Excellent report, many thanks for this. Loved the way you explained both the lenses and their uses with the cameras and demonstrated this with actual photos and video. This has been very useful for me - thanks.
Your questions are really soul searching. I'm a consumer / enthusiast. I do appreciate the sharpness of the better lenses, but I am not in a position to invest in the top end of the lenses. For me, I think the F4s will have to suffice, but I do want to buy some primes like the 50 mm f/1.8 and the 85mm. I also want the a 14 to 30. :-)
I didn't notice the "S" in the title and was hoping for Tamron/Sigma/Nikon comparison - but nonetheless a helpful and thorough review I'll definitely get back to when buying a Z-Mount some years in the future.
Love the 24-70mm f/4 S lens. My walkaround and travel. I don't bring the D850 and the 24-120 f/4G with me anymore when i travel since it is so heavy. Love how light both the Z6 and this lens.
I think having the added extra stop for low light is an added benefit am between whether I should keep the f4 as well, you brought up valid points, use case certainly is a big factor. But am loving my 2.8
Hi !! great video and better explanation. Photos are amazing!!. I am thinking in purchasing a Z6 or a D780 for a full frame camera. I own a D7100 (sigma 18-35, f/1.8) which I will keep as my 2nd camera. 24-70 2.8 lens looks like great option. Do you prefer the Z6 over the new D780 DSLR? I am interested (not profesional) in street photography, portraits, travel, etc. What other lenses you recommend? Thanks in advance for your advice !
Beautiful comparisons btwn the 3 lenses. I'm a hobbyist so do you think it's worth getting the f2.8 version rather than the f4? I snap alot of nature and portraits and love bokeh. Thnks?
Did you switch over to mirrorless 100% or are you still shooting DSLR? I am shooting D850 D500 and I still love my trusty D600. Im thinking I will wait for Nikon to really get mirrored down I shoot allot of Video and landscapes. And can navigate the Bodies I have.. also id you did switch WHY? My thing is if Nikon dont really get the mirrorless down I will go FujiFilm and us an adapter becauee I have allot of glass
great video, i got the F4 kit when the Nikon Z6 first came out, but because of the price, i wont be getting the 2.8. My next S line lens will be the 50mm followed by the 85mm
Hi Leigh, really found this vlog very useful as it created discussions in my heard, I have the FX 2.8 VR & thinking of moving from my D850 to the Z8 body so might save up for the 2.8 24-70 as this is what i'm used to. Thank you again for the information, very much appreciated.
Great video. I love the new f/2.8 lens and it stays on my Z6 as my go to travel lens. I don’t mind the weight/size increase over the f/4. However, since I shoot events, I needed the f/2.8. If not for that, I think I would have likely simply bought the kit with the f/4. It looks like a really great lens.
![Eminem - Fuel (feat. JID) [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/t5H_CewqpKA/mqdefault.jpg)
Main reason most havent bought the 2.8 yet is because generally, the F4 is fine and if youre gonna drop the 2k on a Z mount lens it should be for the 70-200......whenever that day comes
I share the same opinion, happy with the f4... let's get the 70-200, gonna be a beast
I'm definitely in that boat. Nikon had announced that they were going to launch the 70-200mm f/2.8 S before the end of the year (2019), but slim chance of that happening now. I feel like 70-200 is a much better zoom range and who knows how much it's going to cost.
@@shaggy.patches you are completely right, I think it'll be around 2000€ (or at least I hope so...) hard enough to afford as a student!
@@darekm6859 for sure not but if your focus is on landscape and not that much on portraits where you gonna need the f2.8 to get nice bookeh, you'll be fine with the f4
It's coming! Nikon is making the best 70-200 2.8 ever.
Hands down the best review and comparison of these lenses. Great presentation, no filler, to the point, and all the points were useful and what I was looking for. Thank you!
Nikon's designers did something right with the Z cameras. The Z6 and Z7 feel so good in the hand, it's amazing. I tried the Z6 with the 24-70 f2.8 and it felt surprisingly good, even though I'm primarily a Leica M and Panasonic GH shooter for stills and video respectively. Based on feel alone, I can imagine using this camera with a lot of pleasure.
The best use for the electronic window is to show off.
I've never seen a lens with this feature IRL, but in videos it looks cool.
Doesn’t the electronic window also show depth of field range?
i live in the north of norway i need the 2.8 for the daytime in the winter :-)
This was an excellent and instructive video. You get to the point straight away, no self-aggrandizement or filler - no time wasted, just good information.
I use a f/2.8 and don't mind the extra weight. I got so used to it, I don't even feel it anymore. It's always nice having that extra stop when you need it.
I bought my Z6 as a kit with the F4. It is a great lens. But I couldn't believe how much sharper the F/2.8 was. Also I wanted to shoot astrophotography and so I coughed up the money for the F/2.8. I have not been disappointed.
I can not say the same, Just bought the 2.8 and it has an absolutely magic to it in terms you carry the best these is BUT I think the f4 will do the same job for me especially when using high f stops.
@@stefannantzyeah untill you shoot in a low light environment
It really depends on your type of photography. For landscapes, which is what I'm doing, the f4 is the lens I would go for. It's light and smaller and the image quality is just as good. Ricci Talks has compared the two lenses and zooming in at 2:1 there is a slight difference in sharpness. But no one will ever notice that unless you print very, very, very, very large. All of this is not a concern yet for me because I still shoot DSLR... yes I love my D850 :-)
I stumbled upon your video when searching RUclips for videos about the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 that I'd just purchased.
The f/2.8 aperture is a must for my type of photography, shooting concert in low light situations.
Jeezus, this new lens on that Z is such a work of art. I know everyone is nuts about SONY, but aesthetically and ergonomically these Nikons are in a different league!!
These new nikons are all rip-offs. Seriously, all that plastic for all those $$$?! I shoot plenty of nikon pro lenses and have fluffed around with the z-mount ones, but am not even going to consider getting them unless nikon tosses them to me for free (which they won't, particularly after I blasted the 24-70 kit lens NPS gave me on loan previously). The light weight is nice though.
@@grootbatavia hmmm interesting... I didn't know they had so much plastic in them...!!
@@grootbatavia I know this replay is kinda late but dude, it doesn't need to be made from metal to be good. Older 24-70 2.8G have problem with zoom. A lot of people complain that the zoom is not smooth and got stuck eventually. Mine from time to time especially in rainy days at events, zoom was not very smooth. Other days was fine. Now i'm using 2.8S and is lighter, a little bit compact and has a better performance.
@@GeorgeUrsan good morning George, I'm not knocking optical performance, 8 know it's good. That said, I like lenses that feel like they are build to last. A lot of my work is in remote locations and I can not afford to have something go bad. Once my 300mm 4 pf went out in the bush and it took NPS over the weeks to get me a replacement.
@@grootbatavia Of course it needs to be reliable as far as build quality, but like i said, G version is prone to go bad because of stuck zoom ring. it only needs a small hit in the front, that's why i thought. Anyway that's my opinion. I'm just trying to spread my experience with the Z.
I just purchased the 24-70 f2.8 S lens this afternoon as well as the 14-24 f2.8 S lens.
Thank you for your thoughtful review. It has confirmed my decision.
I appreciate your thoughts on this lens. I already own the f/4 S lens, but still ponder buying the 2.8 S and taking the $$$ hit--even after watching this video several times! Leigh, I'll probably view it again before making up my mind. Thank you for your considerable insights.
Great review, thank you, Leigh!
I have the 2.8 on a Z6. It’s perfect for all the situations I find myself in with portraits, events and corporate head shots. I don’t usually have the space to use a 70-200, but if I do I’ll use my fav (older) 80-200 2.8 on my D750. But that’s rare since I’ve been shooting the 24-70 2.8. It’s addicting. No regrets on the cost, it’s paid for itself many times over.
Tried both, kept the f4 S lens vs the 2.8 because the f4 can focus much closer. That was the decider for me.
RUclips recommendation brought me here, thankfully. I'm thinking of switching from APS-C Sony to Nikon and your review brings me closer to Nikon. Subscribed. Keep up the good work.
Ironically, I just bought the Sony 24-70mm 2.8 G-master lens earlier today, and then I find this video. I've been a "prime lenses only" kinda guy for a while, but I started shooting concerts / live music events and I'm getting tired of changing lens one-handedly in dark venues. 2 minutes into playing with the lens, I was already happy with my purchase. The AF speed is far faster than the wide-aperture primes I had been shooting with on my a7RIII.
I myself am actually using the new Tamron G2 lenses with the Z6 with great results. Not to mention that the price is right. Got the tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2 for about $1300, which is half of the price of the equivalent nikon F lens, with no real difference in quality (unless you are a serious pixel peeper). Now Z mount lenses might be a different story, but it has yet to be released so :)
Tamron is a good 3rd party alternative if you want to save some bucks. NOTE: not all tamron lenses have compatibility with the Z cameras. And those who do, need a firmware update (tap-in module) before they work 100%. If you're a manual shooter you shouldn't have any troubles either way.
Remi how’s the autofocus, does the lens makes loud noises in videos?
24-70/2.8 S must be an excellent lens but frightfully expensive. I am more than Happy with f 4 lens. I would have liked a 24-120 / f 4 S lens from Nikon. Would have fulfilled most of the photography & VDO requirements without changing the lens & exposing the sensor to dust & dirt.
To me Nikon is safe guarding their own DSLR camera & lenses against Mirrorless.
Wow, the best video you’ve yet produced, professional, informative, succinct, interesting, and superlative photos. Beyond that I’ve never seen you look more peaceful, relaxed, beautiful. Bravo young lady, well done for certain. Cheers.
You described it well Steve, She really did look calm and serene, in her voice and appearance.
Hi, I see that this review was completed a number of years ago. Regardless, although I was a Nikon shooter for many, many years, I did leave in 2015 for M4/3rds and Panasonic Lumix. I'm more or else back with the new Z6II and Z7II, but both camera kits camer with the 24-70 F4. Yes, I still have all my Nikkor F mount lenses, but slowly I want to have more Z mount lenses. Your review was very interesting and helpful to me. The years that have past since thus review was completed do not mean anything as the facts you offer are the same. I will eventually purchase the 24-70 F2.8 as well as the 70-200 F2.8 and an extender. Your photos of Bryce Canyon (I think) are beautuful as well as Zion (I assume). Your approach to making your informative reviews is very much appreciated. When I do decide to buy the 2.8 version, you'll get my vote through Amazon. Great work. Thanks! 📷 🙏 👍 😃 🤩
I'm a Japanese.
Thank you for a very nice review!
Your speaking is one of the best i have heard , besides the information , your talk is precise and clear , which is lacking in some other you tube videos . you keep the viewer engaged very well due to this fact . greetings from down under .
I mainly purchased my 24-70 2.8 because I wanted the extra stop for low-light shooting, and because it does edge out the f/4 lens in the corners on high-res bodies like the Z7. It was a big upgrade, but I'm glad I did it (sold the f/4 lens for about $450 and luckily I got the 2.8 version while it was on sale last year for about $300 off, so $2000).
For me, I like the LCD on the lens, partially because it gives you a focus scale (the one in-camera is not very useful) and if I want to shoot at a specific FL, I don't have to guess. I've found on some lenses that sometimes, for example, 50mm is not directly at 50mm and might be a hair to the left or right of the marking. Granted I don't go nuts about this, but if someone wanted to get, say, a 35mm shot, it's easier with the window to make sure that you're are spot on at 35mm. But again, yes, the focus scale can be helpful either for landscape or astrophotography.
The f/4 is a decent lens for what it is, and for probably 3/4 of the people who buy it, it will be fine.
The best video i‘ve seen about 24-70 2.8 - thank so much! Great job!
The F2.8S lens definetly shines in low light. As a videographer I use the 24-70 F2.8 lens during the dinner & speeches of the wedding ceremony then I change over to the 14-24 F2.8 lens during the opne dance portion of the wedding ceremony to capture really great footage in extremely low light.
Thanks for your thoughts on the 24-70. When I purchased my Z cameras it included a 24-70 f/4 then later I picked up the 24-70 f/2.8 S. I originally thought I would sell my f/4 S lens but now I decided to keep both. I love taking the f/4 out when I do not wish to be burdened by the weight. I sold my legacy f mount 24-70 f/2.8 lens.
In the photo sequence near the end, there are some errors in reported settings. At least one shot said it was F/2, another said 7mm, another was at ISO 6. I dont think the lens/camera can achieve those values.
I got the 2.8 version because I will be travelling with it and didn’t want to switch lenses but still wanted to have a reasonably bright lens. For normal use, I think the f4 version + 1 or 2 f1.8 primes is a better solution.
My main justification for the new f2.8 lens would be for event / conference photography where light is low and shutter speeds can’t go too low on people. But having the latest G version makes the expense of the S lens very hard to accept, especially as I have the f4 S lens. Maybe something for the future
It's just simply too expensive right now. I have the same issue as you, but if it were half the price I'd be on it. I need my f4 for street stuff and everyday carrying. I love that little lens so much.
Love my Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 S with the Z7.
Love the SnapChick. Best reviews.
What is the snapchick?
Thank you for this very informative comparison. I have the f4 S version, but I don't think I'll be pulling the trigger on the 2.8 as I don't need the wider aperture, or the extra size and weight. Like you, I don't much care for carrying around my 2.8G lens. I'd really love Nikon to bring out the 70-200 mm f4 S, as that would make a great landscape and portrait lens.
Is that a new hairstyle? I love it. As a long-term follower of your channel, I think you (and Raymond) get better looking as time goes by.
I'm coming from the Fuji Line which was a 24mb system. While going to the Z system I was trying to keep my lense inventory to a minimum.
I do NOT produce large prints, and actually most of my pics go into either books or social media. I've found that the z 24-70mm f2.8 produce 98 percent of the shots that I need.
I might be a little spoiled not have a 90mm for portraits, but going from 24mb to 45 plus - I have ample room for cropping.
I've been with the Z system for almost a year now, and the only other lense that I have is the z 35mm f1.8. This would be my street, low light, indoor lense. I'm happy with the hole system. Looking forward to try out either lense with some astrophotos this upcoming November.
Keep up the good work, I enjoy watching the experiences that you are sharing.
This is an amazing lens. I have the f4 and that is a good lens but this lens is like using a group of primes. I love it.
Thanks for taking the time to do this. I’ve been on the fence about which way to go here, Z6 with the f4 kit, or just the body and the 2.8. You gave me some solid info as well as practical application examples. Loved it and subscribed.
I own a 24-70 f2.8S and was hesitant before buying it but it turned out to be the best decision... The quality is phenomenal and you dont need to take it off its a perfect all rounder...
Another good unbiased video. Like you I have all three lens and really like them all. Since I’m still shooting my D850 and 810 along with my Z6 my F mount 2.8 is still a staple in my kit and is amazing. The F4 S lens is great for personal, causal shooting and run and gun work, you just can’t beat the size and weight. The new 2.8 S lens is superb, I use this for all my professional video work and photos shoots on the Z6, my photo shoot kit now consists of the Z6 with then 2.8 S lens and the D850 with a 70-200 2.8 F lens. I’m really looking forward to the 70-200 2.8 S and the high end Z body when they are released. Again thanks for the good review 😊📷👍🏾
I absolutely love the way that you present content. You have a very unique style that's just so friendly, refreshing and draws me right in. The videos just seem so warm and interesting. I could watch them for hours :D
It was expensive, but I followed my instinct to never buy a body with kit lens. I waited and added a 2.8 S lens to my Z6 body as soon as it was available. I tried video early on with the FTZ and my 50mm 1.4G lens. The noise made this setup unusable. The 2.8 S lens is fantastic and I will never look back.
I am moving from a DSLR to a Z6 II and was debating getting the 2.8 but now going with the f/4. Thank you very helpful
Thank you so much for this review. After I watched the part where you are showing how smoothly and noiselessly focus works, I decided to buy the lens. It really is an amazing piece of glass. Keep up the good work!
RIP
Really helpful review and beautiful choice of music for your slideshow at the end! August Wilhelmsson!! 👏🏻✨
First video that actually tested the AF hunting in a video sample. Thanks a lot for that!
I do a ton of concerts, so I definitely need the lower F-stop. And the noise less focus, is an instant win.
An excellent review! You get to the tradeoffs between lenses that are just what I have been agonizing about since the 24-70 f/2.8 came out. I'm still on the edge but teetering toward the 2.8. Thanks!?
Video helps a bit, particularly those who don't have a full set of FX lenses and are transitioning from Nikon DSLR, or those just looking to buy a Z body factoring in whether to buy the F4 kit for an extra $600, or to just use that towards the $2,300 F2.8. Definitely the 24-70mm of choice, but that additional $1,700 is a tough sell for anyone who isn't using it for professional work.
As a lens in the kit, for $600 it is a bargain and can be sold later for that once the kit discount goes way. I really enjoy my f/4 and its performance compared to the G and E 2.8 F mounts I have. For the weight, size and optical performance it is hard to beat at that price. My walking around sling bag has a SB900, Z6, 24-70 f/4 and a prime, depended on where I am going...50 1.8 S(Sharpest lens I have ever used) or my smallest 85 which is the 1.8G. For paid work I am still using mostly F lenses but saving for the Z mount 70-200 2.8 S that is due this fall. By that time I will add the Z7 to replace the D850 for high res work. Everything that does not need those file sizes is shot with the Z6.
Curious to see what the kit lens will be going for as more Z users sell them. The notion that most Z users will eventually buy the F2.8 seems unlikely, given the price/target market. Although with a $1,000 MSRP, it's hard to imagine a used sample going for much less than the original add on cost of $600, assuming in like-new condition.
Performance-wise, the DXO tests place it on par with the 2.8 F mount lenses, likely due to the reduced flange distance, redesigned elements, new coatings, etc. Pretty impressive for a kit lens although how much of that has to do with the inherent advantages of the larger mount diameter and reduced back element/sensor distance one has to wonder. Between that the the noise of the AF-S motors, about the only thing the old F glass has going for it as adapted lenses is the build quality. One stop of light alone doesn't really merit going the adapted route although everyone has their priorities.
When doing architecture or landscape shootings my 24-70 F4 is Perfect.
For Portraits I use the 50 mm F 1,8 which gives a nice bokeh. I am still waiting for the 85mm F1;8.
Thx for your good Video, your nice smile and clear pronounciation which made it easy to Unterstand you very well.
Martin
living in Germany. 😀👍
Being a owner of D7100 with F3.5-f5.6 lens. I really really dig the Full Frame, better than Crop Sensor - especially for photos & videos.
That 2.8 is like one of the sharpest lens I’ve ever seen tested, however I’d prefer the 15-30 if this was a kit option, I dont know why but I love shooting 15,16,17m.... but the f4 would fit 80% of most enthusiasts. And now the Z deals come with the ftz adapter. Just borrow or get a prime for portraits or Astro.
I’m glad you mentioned the focus issue with the G lens. I shot an event over the weekend with the Z6 and the adapted G. I definitely noticed soft focus. It was aggravating.
Great video. I just bought a Nikon Z6 with the 24-70mm f/2.8 S with the 3.o software version.It's fantastic. Question: Which settings are you using when you do the noiseless test where you disappear and the focus automatically comes back to normal when you reappear? I know it's basic but I'd love to know exactly which setting it is. Thank You so much. I love your videos.
one tip, if you want VR in this focal range use the 24-85 VR 3.5-4.5 lens, it's got a variable max aperture; However it has VR, so can add this to the body VR as you say in the video.
15:00 The image description says f2 for the night shot of the stars, which I believe is most probably an error, for we are using f2.8 lens.
It's good to know about the FTZ adapter for the focusing system.
Yes it's really useful info that i didn't know before.
Thanks to author!
Although I have a significant degree of GAS, I'm sticking with the Z 24-70 f/4.0 S on my Z6 for two reasons. First and most persuasive is the price. It just seems so out of balance with anything I would do with the lens. Second, after extensive outings with the Z 35mm f/1.8 S, I find that shallow depth of field is actually often a problem for me in that I want more of the frame in focus by default, and so if I am going to stop down to 4.0 or narrower, what's the point? The f/4.0 does that, of course, by default, and I have no problem shooting wide open with that lens. I do carry the Z 35mm f/1.8 S (and sometimes also the 50mm f/1.8 G with the FTZ adaptor). I have also found that with the IBIS in the Z6, in all but the darkest situations I can handhold the camera and get acceptable results with F mount f/3.5 to 5.6 lenses on the FTZ adaptor, and certainly with the 50mm f/1.8 G. But still, it's definitely the price that keeps me on the sidelines of the f/2.8, so thanks for your report of your experiences with it.
Very nice 🤗🤗
When photographing aurora borealis I try to use as short speed as possible.. between 1-6 sec`s, and for that to work I need a faster lens.
This way I can keep the iso lower! I have got all 3 lenses and love the new f2.8 S!
God your review was so refreshing. Very elaborate and addressed pretty much every thing I could think of. Great examples, and beautiful shots. Really helpful
I own the 24-70 F4 version. I'd rather buy the 14-24 f2.8 when it comes out. I use a 50 mm f1.8, 105 f1.4 and 70-200 for shallow depth of field.
Appreciate your review of these lenses! Nicely done. At 8:06 you mentioned the use of the FTZ adapter with the G lens reduces the Z6 to only use PDAF for focusing. I have been unable to find any source for that comment and was hoping you could point me in the right direction. Your comment sounds counterintuitive because all focusing is accomplished on the Z sensor so the FTZ adapter should have no influence.
Thanks for this, a well thought out take on the comparison. I’m going to trade my f-mount lens against one, mainly because I’m being asked to shoot more and more video now. The silent focusing is the key. I’ve also seen a technical review comparing it to the 24mm f1.8 and the 24-70 S was sharper when wide open
I'm new to photography as a serious hobby and have chosen the Panasonic FZ1000 as my camera of choice, the 4k video is for wildlife, what tips could you offer for my other interest, landscapes, in particular the longer exposure shots, are these type of shots possible with my equipment, I am looking at various filters and other you tubers for info. Can't find anything about the FZ1000 on your channel yet or is it there and i've missed it. Great channel and thanks for all the tips i've gleaned so far.
Love the 24-70mm lens, although my budget only allowed for me to get the cheaper Tamron :)
Great all around lens to go along with my Nikon nifty 50mm 1.8 lens, and I feel prepared for almost all shooting conditions! Thanks for this video!...
The 2.8 S is more than the G version I bought 5 years ago by only $300 but a lot lower than the E version I bought 1 year ago. In store testing of the S lens, with open and looking at the corners really impressed me. But I just sold my D850 and will use that money for a Z7 to compliment my 6 month old Z6 that is so much fun to use, plus is an effective replacement for the D850 for all but the most demanding art director who insists on large files. EVERYthing else is handled by the Z6 with ease. The noise of the G version F mount was never noticed until used on the Z6, it stays busy all the time and surely negatively impacts battery life. My E version was more expensive and I don't see any optical advantage except VR. It is probably the only lens I was expecting more from. I still have my D800 which is now second camera in shoots so when the Z7 arrives, I can start selling off the F mount lenses that have FL covered by S lenses. All the 24-70 Nikkors are good and rugged workhorses but the S f/4 and f/2.8 are better, particularly wide open in the corners. All these considerations get more complicated when seeing that the 70-200 2.8 S is due this fall and to me that is more important to invest in. I have many primes in the mid range, including the excellent 50 1.8 S so the 24-70 2.8 S is not essential. The f/4 is pretty darn good and would be enough if I could only have one.
Thanks for the information about focusing modes. I did not realize the F mounts only use Phase Detection
For quiet videoAF with fmount lens use either a lav mic or a mic that is near you and that is away from the camera.
Just for clarification, using the “Pinpoint” single focusing square invokes Contrast Detect Auto Focus (CDAF) with both native S-Mount lenses as well as F-Mount lenses coupled with the FTZ adapter. Using the “Pinpoint” AF square removes the option for Phase Detect Auto Focus (PDAF) from the Z cameras. I am in the process of copying my archive of 49 years of slides using the Nikon 60mm f/2.8G Micro NIKKOR lens, the FTZ Adapter and the Nikon ES-2 film Digitizing Adapter. I am using the “Pinpoint” AF point to maximize focus accuracy by having the camera focus on the surface of the slide film using CDAF. As we know, CDAF is slower but more accurate than PDAF. At a 1:1 magnification, focus accuracy is critical, hence the need for CDAF.
True! And I do love that pinpoint autofocus for shallow depth of field work!
Thank you for making this video!!! This is exactly the information I was looking for.
I'm happy keeping my old fmount 24-70 2.8 for the wider aperture and the kit lens for weight benefits and convenience.
Having the 2.8 is so nice and gives you a bit more flexibility. The first lens I bought was a Sigma 2.8 17-70 to replace my 18-55 kit. The Nikkor 18-55 kit isn't bad, but once I felt I had somewhat mastered it, I wanted something that gave me a bit more flexibility and better images. Really enjoy how versatile it is. I actually don't mind a heavier lens because I'm a bit odd and equate more weight with better stability.
More flexibility and 2000 dlls. less... I prefer flixibility with the 70-200 f4
Both the f/4 and the f/2.8 have quite non-linear vignetting in the corners. Not a problem due to in-camera correction - unless you have the slimmest of filters on the lens. Then, 24mm and 70mm become unusable at f/4 for certain shots, unless you want to spend lots of time calibrating layers of radial masks on top of your image. With the f/2.8 lens, that kind of vignetting is still present at f/2.8, but it usually does not matter for images taken at f/2.8. At f/4, things are much improved, and the issue disappears at f/5.6 (when you often have the best combination of sharpness and depth of field for landscapes).
Brilliant video, during your main commentary video in the woods you was using the f2.8 lens to show depth of field, could you show a comparison at f4 to show the difference even the same lens at f4. I can not justify the cost of the f2.8.
Thanks a lot.
Completely agree with the noise reduction (on the 2.8 S lens) -- especially when shooting vids. :)
Thank you for a balanced , informative review.
I always feel the f2.8 on these 24-70mm lens best benefit the 70 end giving you a portrait separation option.
Thanks for your smart, balanced, frank review, with your lovely images. I was most interested you didn't see much of an IQ improvement in the f2.8 S over the f4 kit zoom. They both seem like fantastic lenses for the Z's--nice to have a choice for different uses.
This was once again an informative review. That's what I like you for. The 24-70 f/2.8 is a great piece of pure joy. I love it and your reports. Please more of it. great from Berlin Frank
I find the optical qualities of the f/2.8 to be striking. It seems to gather subtle hues quite nicely. 🙂
Thank you for the video! The 4/24-70 mil would be enough for me, because if I need the extra light gathering ability and potential to isolate my subject from the background, I prefer prime lenses. However the Z mount lenses seem to have benefits in autofocus accuracy and speed over the FTZ adapted lenses.
The picture quality on this video is stunning, the audio not so much. I don't mean to be offensive, I intend this comment to be constructive criticism.
Basic ideas that mean a lot! Thank you for the guidance on filming - and acting. I giggled when you pored the coffee on the bed!
Thank you! Best review by a few light years!
Hi Leigh, I always enjoy your videos. You do a wonderful job and I trust what you say! You come across as being very sincere, unbiased, professional and conscientious. Great channel! I believe that the amount of Axis stabilization is only 3 when you mount an F mount lens, with VR, to the Z camera body. I think the only time you get 5 Axis is with a native S lens. Thanks again for your content! Best to you, Rick
minecraftdaltons hi, thanks for the reply😊. I’ve used f mount vr lenses with the Z7 and while the vr does work I find it much better with the native S lenses. Take care, Rick
Excellent report, many thanks for this. Loved the way you explained both the lenses and their uses with the cameras and demonstrated this with actual photos and video. This has been very useful for me - thanks.
Amazing, informative, articulate review as usual. I am getting this lens tomorrow form my Z7. Thanks!
Thanks so much for this video ..I now feel the f2.8 is for me..I am used to this configuration over the decades
Your questions are really soul searching. I'm a consumer / enthusiast. I do appreciate the sharpness of the better lenses, but I am not in a position to invest in the top end of the lenses. For me, I think the F4s will have to suffice, but I do want to buy some primes like the 50 mm f/1.8 and the 85mm. I also want the a 14 to 30. :-)
I didn't notice the "S" in the title and was hoping for Tamron/Sigma/Nikon comparison - but nonetheless a helpful and thorough review I'll definitely get back to when buying a Z-Mount some years in the future.
I am getting this lens for my Nikon Z9 that I just ordered. I will also be using EF canon lens with an adaptor on the camera.
Love the 24-70mm f/4 S lens. My walkaround and travel. I don't bring the D850 and the 24-120 f/4G with me anymore when i travel since it is so heavy. Love how light both the Z6 and this lens.
I think having the added extra stop for low light is an added benefit am between whether I should keep the f4 as well, you brought up valid points, use case certainly is a big factor. But am loving my 2.8
Hi !! great video and better explanation. Photos are amazing!!. I am thinking in purchasing a Z6 or a D780 for a full frame camera. I own a D7100 (sigma 18-35, f/1.8) which I will keep as my 2nd camera. 24-70 2.8 lens looks like great option. Do you prefer the Z6 over the new D780 DSLR? I am interested (not profesional) in street photography, portraits, travel, etc. What other lenses you recommend? Thanks in advance for your advice !
Beautiful comparisons btwn the 3 lenses. I'm a hobbyist so do you think it's worth getting the f2.8 version rather than the f4? I snap alot of nature and portraits and love bokeh. Thnks?
Did you switch over to mirrorless 100% or are you still shooting DSLR? I am shooting D850 D500 and I still love my trusty D600. Im thinking I will wait for Nikon to really get mirrored down I shoot allot of Video and landscapes. And can navigate the Bodies I have.. also id you did switch WHY? My thing is if Nikon dont really get the mirrorless down I will go FujiFilm and us an adapter becauee I have allot of glass
The quiet focusing of the S 2.8 lens was impressive. Is it the same for the f4 lens?
Great video and very detailed review!
I found a typo @ 14:58, the focal length is wrong :P
thanks for the video, very informative. Side note ,was it just me or was there a 7mm on one of your portrait shots in the slide show
great video, i got the F4 kit when the Nikon Z6 first came out, but because of the price, i wont be getting the 2.8. My next S line lens will be the 50mm followed by the 85mm
Soy fotógrafo de bodas y usar diferentes tipos de lentes en una boda es cansado, constantemente hay que cambiar de lentes.
I am a wedding photographer and i use different types of lenses at weddings, is a tiring task, you constantly have to change lenses.
Good One.. Btw u r using which mode for video for autofocus?
Hi Leigh, really found this vlog very useful as it created discussions in my heard, I have the FX 2.8 VR & thinking of moving from my D850 to the Z8 body so might save up for the 2.8 24-70 as this is what i'm used to. Thank you again for the information, very much appreciated.
Great video. I love the new f/2.8 lens and it stays on my Z6 as my go to travel lens. I don’t mind the weight/size increase over the f/4. However, since I shoot events, I needed the f/2.8. If not for that, I think I would have likely simply bought the kit with the f/4. It looks like a really great lens.
One of the best review i have ever seen.. great job👍
Thank you, you included a lot of useful information, especially performance with the FTZ adaptor. Great review.