@@DEMiURGE455 First of all, only a small minority of people did that, because its simply not worth it over just a simple whipping. Next off, you overestimate the monstrosity and cruelness of humanity. Don’t forget that on the coasts of Africa were huge kingdoms that specialized in selling slaves to Europeans, and using that trade to get more slaves by oppressing neighboring kingdoms. Terrible humans will always find a way to fulfill their selfish desires, its always just who has more power.
@@DEMiURGE455 Basically a slave master cutting off a pinky, an ear, an arm, or anything would massively decrease a slaves value, and they were incredibly expensive. There was no point in chopping off anything, because no matter what you chopped off the slave would have worse performance, and you would still have to feed him the same amount, thus losing you money that you otherwise could have had. So, cutting of pieces of slaves was rarely done because it hurt both parties. Only if the slave was insanely disobedient or if the master was insanely insane would this probably ever happen. Anyways, hope you didn’t get the impression I’m defending slavery, but you gotta remember that slavery is a means to get more money, not to just ruin lives for the fun of it.
The trick is to try and get in ahead of the meta, your racism is a lot less potent if everyone else is doing it. Currently im brushing up on my internal middle eastern racism. Not only is it a hot button area right now, you also have 1000s of years of racial and ethnic conflicts over the most petty of causes. As a budding racist these sorts of hotly debated but minor differences are pure gold because you can generally apply them to any person or group from that area and hit a nerve. Racist knowledge you obtain from say, and Iraqi about the Lebanese can generally also be applied fairly smoothly to Jordanians. Plus you get a bit of side anti israeli racism and as 109 people will tell you, the classics are classics for good reason.
@jimboblordofeskimos you sir are a paragon of wisdom. My middle aged Syrian roommate dislikes Persians and says they're degenerate. But according to my Persian roommate, Syria is a fundamentalist Islamic shithole and that's why Israel kicks them around. He actually supports Israel weirdly enough. Both of them like the War on Terror. Afghanis/Iraqis are the rednecks and cousin-diddlers in middle eastern culture. So yeah, regional racism is 100% the way to go.
stop being an apologist dude.. most indians dont even know the concept of race.. people are super chill with every color of fellars we just embrace is differently because of our different cultures..we dont think someones inferior to us just because of their skin color but we do make jokes on the expense of it which is not racist.. these priviledged westerners have no idea what we go through on a daily basis and judge us on some goofy ass tiktok videos
its not surprising indians support israel since israel while liking hitler since isreal itself is moddled off of himmlers numberg laws in a sense except the target isn;t jews
I can't believe you chose to show the most tame and hygienic example of Indian food-making. That video is cleaner than a semiconductor manufacturing facility compared with the more typical videos people show when they mention how dirty the food is.
Well also Indians poop on the street and they tend to not wear shoes. The only time Indians were really ever but civilized was in the Middle ages or when the British colonized them
Also Jews, because he said that if Jews really valued their lives they would have sacrificed themselves off cliffs to bring attention to them from other nation.
Wouldn't be my number one. I don't think old Leo actually actively hated the people that were killed under his rule, unlike some of the other racists, who actively sought to eradicate people of other races. Yes, the numbers are shocking, but I blame greed and negligence more than racism. I nominate Pol Pot for being the number one racist.
Worth noting that Forrest had a change of heart later in life, he left the Klan as it became more violent, and ended up speaking in favor of advancement for blacks on several occasions
We we don’t completely know if he fully liked black people as the speeches he made could be interpreted either as pro-advancement for black rights, or could equally be interpreted as telling black people to “stay in their lane”.
@@insertnamehere1258 Why not both, though? I took his later actions to mean, "Look, I don't like you and you don't like me, but we're stuck here together, now, as 'equals,' so you'll need to be at least somewhat self-sufficient or else we'll constantly be in each other's hair." I wish the average politician could act like that towards their constituents instead of the open contempt they currently display.
To explain the pro Israel, pro Hitler stance of Indians: Indians who usually are pro Hitler don't know much about him, they don't know the worldviews he held about races or that he considered even them as subhuman. A smaller fraction of people are pro Hitler because Hitler was sort of the enemy's enemy of colonial India. There was even some sort of alliance between the Japanese and Indian infantry to fight the British Indian government to free India. WW2 did cause India's freedom in the end. The pro Israel stance stems mostly from Indians seeing themselves in Israel and Pakistan in Palestine and I guess everybody knows how much India and Pakistan cherish each other. Then there is of course the religious differences of Muslims and Hindus in India. Edit: To mention another reason for Indians being pro Israel, Israel had helped India quite a lot when India was invaded or when India was fighting to end the Bangladesh genocide, all the while when all the western countries were either neutral or actively supporting the side India was fighting
Funnily enough there is this African dude I know who liked Hitler mainly for the same reasons and just because he was a war mongeror and took other people's land. He also likes Russia and even insists that the Russians aren't white and they are anti western imperialism. lol.
not to forget the fact that muslim invaders commited numerous genoicides and horrible atrocities to hindus for centuries.. even leaading to parting of the nation and origin of pakistan but there are still muslims in india commiting horrendous deeds against humanity honestly justified hate
That's what "some prejudices" is, like if you don't like Indians because of some cherrypicked videos on Instagram of unsanitary food, ehh isn't that "racism justification"?
@@Alex-kb2ws The thing is that "eastern Europe" itself is a racist motivated term. It's usually either used by right-wing bigots to A. justify political or economic domination as well as negate their culture as inferior or even non-existent or by left-wing bigots to B. try to explain the failure of the soviet union by blaming the Russian satellites they were simply too inferior to realize the greatness of socialism.
@@mishterkhalid3117 Lincoln stopped slavery and died because of it (he was killed by a Confederate), Stalin killed millions of Ukrainians and Kazakhs, and Hitler... no comments, you know what Hitler did. Mao is such a racist, I would have put him in top 1, because he even hated the Chinese (killed over 40 million)
@A.Y-wt7uwnah, a handful off trolls who for some reason always pick up traction when they are racist. To be fair though, if not always its a response to other africans being racist to us. But these guys for some reason never wanna bring that up
@@SankuneefleRacism against somalis is not taken seriously but somalis essentially fight back using the taboos that were societally established and often go too extreme
Oh yeah. I've met one of those Somalian racists. He kept calling me a bantoid and tried to insist that I was inferior to him. But little did he know that I was the African competitive racist champion🏆 😆 He was dealt with swiftly.
A tad disappointed Harold Covington didn't make the list. From Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia: "He was deported from Rhodesia due to his racist beliefs"
The fact you say King Leopold II means you should actually read about it. The guy just cared about money, he didn't look at race, he didn't systematically kill people because of their race unlike Hitler for example. He worked with natives to exploit others in his greed for rubber who often had barbaric methods. Leopold famously didn't like the killings since he needed workers to acquire the rubber. He is just a lazy ass ruler who didn't mind if money still was coming in, he never even set a foot in Congo. Hitler or better the nazis tried to systematically murder an entire race, even hunted them down with detectives, build camps to kill thousands a day, experimented on them and you really think they are not number one hahha? why?
I mean if we are going by raw numbers maos great leap forward caused the most deaths through systematic starvation, but because they were all racially similar it cant be classed as racism in the case of Leopold he enabled the murder of close to 10 million and was directly the cause of atleast 23 years of suffering if not indirectly the aftermath as well.
@@StoicStick a broad range of 1-15 million not by direct causes and committed by natives themselves non racially motivated... Also I was comparing with the Nazis, you know the guys who systematically gassed people because they simply belonged to a certain race?
Implying half the shit you read about uncle adolf is remotely true... i mean, he was not the nicest lad and had some mental issues but which great men didnt?
Can't believe you went to all of the effort to make this video, but left me out of it. I thought we had something bro. Also first time finding your channel. Subbed.
I mean at his time he was beloved by the vast majority of black people and is credited as being the reason the party shift happened. While it is true he did not push as much legislation as his successor, he did personally want king about the FBI surveying him . His speeches also very much helped the general public to support the civil rights movement more than previousl.
I dont understand why Stalin on the racist scale is the same as Hitler. You are diminishing Hitler's achievements, while clearly overvaluing Stalin's. I would put Stalin in some prejudice, since in my entire life I have heard only one racist thing about Stalin - and thats some discrimination of the jews after the war, and I am not even sure stalin has to do anything with it
Just because you send all kind of people to death that doesnt mean that you arnt racist. Uncle Adolf also didnt only send jews but also nonjewish globalists, communists and marxist and even criminal aryans into his camps and you would most likely still call him antisemitic.
Lets not forget. King Leopolds actions were so absurd and brutal that his own government (Belgium) stepped in and said "We're taking your personal colonies off you because fucking hell you're insane"
@@horss541stalin not being anti black doesn't mean there was no one Stalin was racist to. Jews and many Russian minorities would beg to differ on Stalin allegedly not being racist.
Hitler and Stalin in one line together? They could be in one tier by dictatorship, but not their racial prejudicies. While Hitler literally exterminated certain ethnic groups for their origin, Stalin separated people to loyal and useful for KPSS (his party), Ussr and communism in general and unloyal ones. First groups who suffered from his rule were unloyal classes from Soviet citizens themselves (Russians, Ukrainians, Kazakhs, Caucasians etc) and only after that Poles, Baltics, Finns. He cooperated with communists from these countries, his agenda was to make them communists or move from his way obstacles, oppress, resettle, but not exterminate them whatever it takes.
What lol Stalin was even more anti semtic then Hitler and racist against others please tell me where in the ussr was the Arab soldiers or the Indians etc etc u could find many diverse people under Nazis
Mid list, Leopold was more indifferent to human suffering of another race and operating in a region of that race. There's the classic, Pol Pot, then there's the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, who presided over Japan's excesses of racist imperialism during WWII, soooo many african warlords, Malcolm X with his promotion of the Nation of Islam with its absurd black supremacist beliefs, Christopher Columbus and friends, and so so many more. The richness and diversity of evil and abhorrent racism is one of humanity's greatest treasures. Swim, get cancelled, give us the good stuff!
6:15 Fun fact about the hands chopping off thing, that was actually something one of his governor implented and he hated it. Not out of moral or ethical reasons, but because how's a slave supposed to work for him without hands?????
Stalin only hated those who were hostile to communism. Stalin's favorite movie was literally "The Circus" (1936) about a white woman with a black child.
@@PagIiacci He actively attempted to eradicate several national identities, purposely drew borders so that on independence they'd be dysfunctional failed states, and forcibly expelled and deported millions of people before and after WW2. There was also discrimination against religious minorities such as the jewish community, but not because of ethnicity, it was instead about their religion being at odds with the atheist state.
Bruh Stalin is the biggest responsible for the defeat of the nazis in WW2 you should be thanking him for not speaking German right now or even being alive
No, you don’t understand our dynamics at all so don’t call us Uncle Ruckus when 3 precent of Somalis in S.A. have been brutally murdered by Blacks. My grandfather fought against Apartheid, we truly weren’t raised to hate Africans. But when AMISON Congolese commit war crimes… We get a little mad
As an Indian, let me add a point in defence of some twitter users liking titler. We were colonised by the British and WW2 is what weakened Britain enough for us to get our independence.
*put's himself into the "some prejudices" section* *starts assignign racism levels to groups of inhabitants of whole countries* That's exactly my type of humour :D
there is a poem about The Fuzzy Wuzzy Angels its not an insult to any solder but a word or praise , This poem depicts the heroic efforts of the Fuzzy Wuzzy angels, native bearers who rescued wounded Australian soldiers during World War II. Characterized by their distinctive appearance, the bearers display compassion and resilience in caring for the injured. The poem highlights their unwavering determination to protect and transport the soldiers, despite the absence of traditional halos or religious imagery.
as an indian we are rascists and we are not hyper sensitive like you guys getting offended by a single sound wave coming from a white person. we actually enjoy racism(in a fun way) and we don't worship hitler . we suppourt non violence yes we are avid israel suppourters because they have helped us but I fully condemn violence whether it is from hamas/israel/russia/ukraine anyone . we are racists but we have huge empathy too . in world war when poland was demolished one indian maharaja gave shelters to them and opened schools for them. we welcomed parsis . we have welcomed jews too.
King Leopold was a colossal dick and all, but his exploits have been exaggerated to a comical degree. There weren't anywhere near enough people in the country for him to kill that many, Belgian Congo was extremely underdeveloped back then, there was no way they could support enough people for those death tolls to be possible.
You probably shouldn't have used an entire country's flag as the place marker for a specific group of people. But anyway, I liked this because you said most people have some prejudices. My own prejudices might be pretty mild, but they still exist.
It's important to compare the nature and extent of racism between Adolf Hitler and King Leopold II, which requires a thorough analysis of the historical contexts in which these two figures operated. Adolf Hitler, as the leader of the Nazi regime in Germany, embodied extreme and systemic racism. His Nazi ideology was based on the belief in the superiority of the Aryan "race" and the necessity to eliminate those he deemed inferior, especially Jews, Roma, Slavs, and other ethnic groups and minorities. Hitler orchestrated the systematic genocide of six million Jews and millions of others during the Holocaust, an unimaginable atrocity motivated by his racist and anti-Semitic vision. On the other hand, King Leopold II of Belgium is often associated with the brutal exploitation of the Congo under Belgian colonial rule. His reign was marked by coercive practices, atrocities, and systematic abuses of Congolese populations, often in the name of economic profit. Leopold II established a system of exploiting the natural resources of the Congo that resulted in immeasurable suffering for the Congolese, including forced labor, mutilations, and massacres. While Leopold II's actions were motivated by greed, racism, and disdain for indigenous peoples were also present in his colonial policy. However, it is essential to note that Hitler's systematic racism and ideology of racial supremacy formed the basis of a regime that deliberately sought to exterminate millions of people due to their ethnic, religious, or cultural identity. In conclusion, while both historical figures were responsible for grave atrocities and racist practices, the nature and scale of racism embodied by Adolf Hitler, particularly through the Holocaust, place him in a distinct category of racial brutality. His Nazi regime was characterized by an ideology of racial hatred that led to the deaths of millions of innocent people, which partly explains why he is often considered to be more racist than King Leopold II.
You can wash your feet as you wash your hands. This kind of thinking makes us forget that fights can include more than fists. Also, that's CLEARLY A REGIONAL thing. Racial bias is about appearance.
@@alicemalice2597 Never watched it but I have heard some good things. Might have to check it out. Unless you're making a joke and it went over my head lol
6:27 Not to defend the King of Racism but the Congo population in 1890 was around 8 million, and while the population graphs and models do show a small drop drop, it's not by half, so I kind of doubt that Leopold the 2 managed to kill more people in Congo than existed there at the time.
Im not a historian, nor 100% sure if he was actually racist or crazy but Hirohito the Japanese emperor of Japan from 1926 - 1989 should be considered for this list for the amount of non Japanese people were killed in the Pacific islands and Asia. I think estimates are like 25-30 million.
I tried competitive racism, but the players were too toxic so i left
Lmao
#relatable
Wdym? Racist community is one of the most welcoming one as long as you are racist with them (even your race doesnt matter)
Bro was clearly Bronze 1 the racist community is the most tolerant and welcoming community in the world as long as you're racist.
Yeah some people take the hobby way to seriously.
Ghandi was actually pretty racist. He should be in casual or competive racist.
into the suggestion box
Why?
@@downey2294 it's not a suggestion it's a correction
@@francissanto12 Because all the intellectiuals at his time were racist, as racist ideas were treated as common sense back then.
@@aheendwhz1 i think a better question was how. How was he racist?
It’s not a crime against Humanity, if you not consider them Human
It isn't if they aren't humans
@@rangar6853 but they justify it by saying they aren’t. Get better reading comprehension or at least try and understand the point of the comment.
Even if you do that to animals it’s still awful. Imagine cutting off pieces of your horse’s body every time they went too slow for your liking.
@@DEMiURGE455 First of all, only a small minority of people did that, because its simply not worth it over just a simple whipping.
Next off, you overestimate the monstrosity and cruelness of humanity. Don’t forget that on the coasts of Africa were huge kingdoms that specialized in selling slaves to Europeans, and using that trade to get more slaves by oppressing neighboring kingdoms.
Terrible humans will always find a way to fulfill their selfish desires, its always just who has more power.
@@DEMiURGE455 Basically a slave master cutting off a pinky, an ear, an arm, or anything would massively decrease a slaves value, and they were incredibly expensive.
There was no point in chopping off anything, because no matter what you chopped off the slave would have worse performance, and you would still have to feed him the same amount, thus losing you money that you otherwise could have had.
So, cutting of pieces of slaves was rarely done because it hurt both parties. Only if the slave was insanely disobedient or if the master was insanely insane would this probably ever happen.
Anyways, hope you didn’t get the impression I’m defending slavery, but you gotta remember that slavery is a means to get more money, not to just ruin lives for the fun of it.
thanks for this. i've been trying to get into racism but I was really ignorant of the meta.
i tried being racist against phoenicians, but apparently that strat hasn't been in use for 2,300 years. will report back when i git gud.
@@MemekingJagI've lived in Phoenix for 15 years it really isn't that hard to be racist against us.
@@MemekingJag we were more racist than the Romans, Hannibal alone had a lot more racism than most of Rome combined 🗿
The trick is to try and get in ahead of the meta, your racism is a lot less potent if everyone else is doing it.
Currently im brushing up on my internal middle eastern racism. Not only is it a hot button area right now, you also have 1000s of years of racial and ethnic conflicts over the most petty of causes. As a budding racist these sorts of hotly debated but minor differences are pure gold because you can generally apply them to any person or group from that area and hit a nerve.
Racist knowledge you obtain from say, and Iraqi about the Lebanese can generally also be applied fairly smoothly to Jordanians.
Plus you get a bit of side anti israeli racism and as 109 people will tell you, the classics are classics for good reason.
@jimboblordofeskimos you sir are a paragon of wisdom. My middle aged Syrian roommate dislikes Persians and says they're degenerate. But according to my Persian roommate, Syria is a fundamentalist Islamic shithole and that's why Israel kicks them around. He actually supports Israel weirdly enough.
Both of them like the War on Terror. Afghanis/Iraqis are the rednecks and cousin-diddlers in middle eastern culture.
So yeah, regional racism is 100% the way to go.
As an Indian, I agree. We are taught that "life is a race, be the racist".
stop being an apologist dude.. most indians dont even know the concept of race.. people are super chill with every color of fellars we just embrace is differently because of our different cultures..we dont think someones inferior to us just because of their skin color but we do make jokes on the expense of it which is not racist.. these priviledged westerners have no idea what we go through on a daily basis and judge us on some goofy ass tiktok videos
as a hyperborean wararyan i agree with this proverb
we wuz aryan@@bonelessvegetal818
its not surprising indians support israel since israel while liking hitler since isreal itself is moddled off of himmlers numberg laws in a sense except the target isn;t jews
why do indians always mention they’re indian in every sentence
I can't believe you chose to show the most tame and hygienic example of Indian food-making.
That video is cleaner than a semiconductor manufacturing facility compared with the more typical videos people show when they mention how dirty the food is.
I know people like to eat food while watching youtube I didnt want to put people off their food haha
@@StoicStick Fair enough, lmao
Ive seen some stuff that haunts me in my sleep. StoicStick is a coward
@@StoicStick thanks man, I was indeed eating food at that moment
Well also Indians poop on the street and they tend to not wear shoes. The only time Indians were really ever but civilized was in the Middle ages or when the British colonized them
Look up Gandhi's views on black people and you'll move him up 2 tiers for sure
considering his views are pretty "standard" its casual racism at best.
Also Jews, because he said that if Jews really valued their lives they would have sacrificed themselves off cliffs to bring attention to them from other nation.
And Lincoln.
He was also extremely misogynistic and groomed many of his daughters into being his sex slaves.
Sounds like Gandhi was intelligent.
Wouldn't be my number one. I don't think old Leo actually actively hated the people that were killed under his rule, unlike some of the other racists, who actively sought to eradicate people of other races. Yes, the numbers are shocking, but I blame greed and negligence more than racism. I nominate Pol Pot for being the number one racist.
karl marx and stalin are the actual number one
What did Pol Pot do?
@@derpchief9614 same as hitler but worse
@@derpchief9614 I'd also like to know about that vicious monster.
search "cambodian killing tree" @@surgeonsergio6839
Worth noting that Forrest had a change of heart later in life, he left the Klan as it became more violent, and ended up speaking in favor of advancement for blacks on several occasions
Oh, so Forrest Gump having his name isn’t so bad
Not worth noting.
Lead the kkk which was founded to deprive black people of their rights, and also owned slaves.
We we don’t completely know if he fully liked black people as the speeches he made could be interpreted either as pro-advancement for black rights, or could equally be interpreted as telling black people to “stay in their lane”.
@@insertnamehere1258 Why not both, though? I took his later actions to mean, "Look, I don't like you and you don't like me, but we're stuck here together, now, as 'equals,' so you'll need to be at least somewhat self-sufficient or else we'll constantly be in each other's hair." I wish the average politician could act like that towards their constituents instead of the open contempt they currently display.
The Klan wasn’t even racist to begin with as far as I know. It was started to assist widows and generally play a sort of vigilante role.
To explain the pro Israel, pro Hitler stance of Indians:
Indians who usually are pro Hitler don't know much about him, they don't know the worldviews he held about races or that he considered even them as subhuman. A smaller fraction of people are pro Hitler because Hitler was sort of the enemy's enemy of colonial India. There was even some sort of alliance between the Japanese and Indian infantry to fight the British Indian government to free India. WW2 did cause India's freedom in the end.
The pro Israel stance stems mostly from Indians seeing themselves in Israel and Pakistan in Palestine and I guess everybody knows how much India and Pakistan cherish each other. Then there is of course the religious differences of Muslims and Hindus in India.
Edit: To mention another reason for Indians being pro Israel, Israel had helped India quite a lot when India was invaded or when India was fighting to end the Bangladesh genocide, all the while when all the western countries were either neutral or actively supporting the side India was fighting
Funnily enough there is this African dude I know who liked Hitler mainly for the same reasons and just because he was a war mongeror and took other people's land.
He also likes Russia and even insists that the Russians aren't white and they are anti western imperialism. lol.
not to forget the fact that muslim invaders commited numerous genoicides and horrible atrocities to hindus for centuries.. even leaading to parting of the nation and origin of pakistan but there are still muslims in india commiting horrendous deeds against humanity honestly justified hate
First of all, Hitler supported existence of Israel. Read on it, it's true.
Yea sad
@@bardum.4458 proof?
Stoic Stick showing us how discrimination is really done.
In Doofenshmirtz voice: And by objective, I mean COMPLETELY JECTIVE
There should have been the "racism justifiers" below casual
that's just casual racism while thinking you're really smart about it.
That's what "some prejudices" is, like if you don't like Indians because of some cherrypicked videos on Instagram of unsanitary food, ehh isn't that "racism justification"?
@@EdgieAliasyeah thats the point they are pretencius lol
hello ungoc
@@EdgieAliasSo Stoic would go into casual racism?
The fact that you forgot my favourite H.P Lovecraft is upsetting.
Also any person from eastern europe is immediately at least Casual Racist tier.
Congratulations on being (xeno)racist against eastern europeans. It seems you are on par with us
@@pecare9595anything incorrect said by him?
He ran out of names he couldn't pronounce, and named his cat something he could.
Anybody who names cats are probably bad people.
@@Alex-kb2ws The thing is that "eastern Europe" itself is a racist motivated term. It's usually either used by right-wing bigots to A. justify political or economic domination as well as negate their culture as inferior or even non-existent or by left-wing bigots to B. try to explain the failure of the soviet union by blaming the Russian satellites they were simply too inferior to realize the greatness of socialism.
Why am I not on this list?
anime profile picture
@@NBrioDaZueraRulesEven more of a reason why I should have been on this list
@@ImGazu anyone who likes anime 🇳 🇪 🇪 🇩 🇸 🇹 🇴 🇧 🇪 🇹 🇴 🇷 🇹 🇺 🇷 🇪 🇩 🇹 🇴 🇩 🇪 🇦 🇹 🇭, and asking to be on this list is normie npc sjw behavior
@@ImGazuYou have a point
@@tiIebreakerI'm hurt. Offended even.
I would put Gandi as a higher-tier racist than Kanye West
He was less racist compared to Abe Lincoln.
Same with Abe Lincoln. I highly doubt he would eat dinner with a black man outside of a political stunt.
@@Leg1503 Before Frederick Douglass at least.
The "I don't need someone busting moves on top of my food" line had me rolling from laughter so hard that I subbed instantly
how many people didn't get that this is a joke
i thought this video was slightly serious until he put stalin and mao at no.2 and put Lincoln at not racist.
@@mishterkhalid3117 yeah Lincoln hated blacks
@@mishterkhalid3117
Lincoln stopped slavery and died because of it (he was killed by a Confederate), Stalin killed millions of Ukrainians and Kazakhs, and Hitler... no comments, you know what Hitler did. Mao is such a racist, I would have put him in top 1, because he even hated the Chinese (killed over 40 million)
Yeah, I was shocked when he put Adolf on the "All stars" tier. Doesn't deserve a spot above "some prejudices" if we're being honest
As a somali, I was JUMPSCARED by the "somali twitter section" racism 💀
@A.Y-wt7uwnah, a handful off trolls who for some reason always pick up traction when they are racist.
To be fair though, if not always its a response to other africans being racist to us. But these guys for some reason never wanna bring that up
Fr bro 😢
@@SankuneefleRacism against somalis is not taken seriously but somalis essentially fight back using the taboos that were societally established and often go too extreme
Balkans not mentioned?!?!? You’re now on the list 😤
Balkans are all номер 1 💪💪💪💪🇧🇬
Oh yeah. I've met one of those Somalian racists. He kept calling me a bantoid and tried to insist that I was inferior to him. But little did he know that I was the African competitive racist champion🏆 😆
He was dealt with swiftly.
Bro’s playing ranked
Which country bro ?
I'm Somali and I'm African lol
Somalis call all people derogatory words tbh but chinese and arabs don't cry a out it
@@skp8748 i don't
ghandi should have been higher
Its Gandhi
A tad disappointed Harold Covington didn't make the list. From Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia: "He was deported from Rhodesia due to his racist beliefs"
Damn. This is really is a Nazis telling Imperial Japan to " Chill Out" moment
This was even before Robert Mugabe took over and started to a bit of oppressing of his own.
I win, because I can't leave my real sentiment as a reply.
@innitbruv-lascocomics9910 the German attaché to Croatia incident 😂
Me : S tier
I refuse to elaborate
SS tier here ✋
I challenge you for the S tier spot
Any idea what tier I belong to?
For context: Pojeets and Allahu Akbar boom 💥 people. I don't like them.
Starting with kanye knocked me out 🤣
The fact you say King Leopold II means you should actually read about it. The guy just cared about money, he didn't look at race, he didn't systematically kill people because of their race unlike Hitler for example. He worked with natives to exploit others in his greed for rubber who often had barbaric methods. Leopold famously didn't like the killings since he needed workers to acquire the rubber. He is just a lazy ass ruler who didn't mind if money still was coming in, he never even set a foot in Congo.
Hitler or better the nazis tried to systematically murder an entire race, even hunted them down with detectives, build camps to kill thousands a day, experimented on them and you really think they are not number one hahha? why?
I mean if we are going by raw numbers maos great leap forward caused the most deaths through systematic starvation, but because they were all racially similar it cant be classed as racism in the case of Leopold he enabled the murder of close to 10 million and was directly the cause of atleast 23 years of suffering if not indirectly the aftermath as well.
@@StoicStick a broad range of 1-15 million not by direct causes and committed by natives themselves non racially motivated...
Also I was comparing with the Nazis, you know the guys who systematically gassed people because they simply belonged to a certain race?
@@StoicStick racism is when you kill your own race? that explains mao and stalin being on hitler tier lol
that or casual ignorance
U realise he literally was racist 🤦♀️
Implying half the shit you read about uncle adolf is remotely true... i mean, he was not the nicest lad and had some mental issues but which great men didnt?
Balkan and Eastern European countries: S tier
As an Eastern European I disagree, we're actually curious and surprised when we see different race people, not racist
@@danielzip8785 You live in the capital + You fell off + Gen Z + L + liberal
@@anon3631 ._.
king leopold did nothing wrong
Is this a joke? Because it's not funny.
Agreed
you showed the indian foot video as soon as i started to eat and i almost threw up
oh no but crushed grapes made into wine by white people wont make you vomit boohoo.. just say you find brown people repulsive ?
@@bardum.4458 I'm sober and I litterly find the feet video weird
@businessman4473 ok lmao
@@ShaytanDharmok pojeet
I did not enjoy 6:57
Pol Pot should maybe be added to the all stars....
Didn't he mostly kill his own race?
pol pot wasnt that racist he was just red and the grim reaper
Everyone should be the same race
-Pol Pot
@@Shoteaux2wasn't that racist...except toward Chams, Viet people, and the Chinese.
@@gabrielethier2046 He hated the Vietnamese and genocided them.
This list is pretty objective
Somalis are racist against all tbh not just black people..
Can't believe you went to all of the effort to make this video, but left me out of it. I thought we had something bro.
Also first time finding your channel. Subbed.
Somali twitter here being here has me weak
5:44 it should have been me...
Hollywood deserved a spot in the competitive tier
when you say you don't like something and people go crazy... people don't like being rejected
Wow! Glad to see you have done all this wonderful research, watching BBC documentaries. Good job!
*watching
Such an underrated YT channel
You know the guy knows fuck nor shit when he put JFK in "Not racist"
Explain
I mean at his time he was beloved by the vast majority of black people and is credited as being the reason the party shift happened. While it is true he did not push as much legislation as his successor, he did personally want king about the FBI surveying him . His speeches also very much helped the general public to support the civil rights movement more than previousl.
go on then, give us your story about how JFK was a racist. Genuinely interested
Keep up the good work
I dont understand why Stalin on the racist scale is the same as Hitler. You are diminishing Hitler's achievements, while clearly overvaluing Stalin's. I would put Stalin in some prejudice, since in my entire life I have heard only one racist thing about Stalin - and thats some discrimination of the jews after the war, and I am not even sure stalin has to do anything with it
Putting Mao in all stars is pretty harsh. Well yeah some minorities were getting hardship but I wouldn’t say he hated them
4:22 It makes sense that a group that is pro-Israel would also be pro-Hitler. Both have no regard for human rights.
How is Stalin all star racist?
Pretty sure he systematically starved a lot of Ukrainians could be wrong
Killing of different ethnic minorities in the USSR, and their targeting during the great purge
I would put Stalin into the non racist group, cause he was sending all types of people, GULAG was rated E for Every race.
Just because you send all kind of people to death that doesnt mean that you arnt racist.
Uncle Adolf also didnt only send jews but also nonjewish globalists, communists and marxist and even criminal aryans into his camps and you would most likely still call him antisemitic.
Lets not forget. King Leopolds actions were so absurd and brutal that his own government (Belgium) stepped in and said "We're taking your personal colonies off you because fucking hell you're insane"
JFK is definitely in casual tier
Next sam o'nella
As an Indian, your analysis of our ranking in the list is perfectly accurate
Stalin and Mao racists??? 😂
Yes, yes they were, just not talked about often.
@@horss541stalin not being anti black doesn't mean there was no one Stalin was racist to.
Jews and many Russian minorities would beg to differ on Stalin allegedly not being racist.
Stalin and Mao weren’t racist
@@owenklein1917 ikr
@@lilahdog568Stalin ended the Holocaust and was a “Russian minority” himself
leopold really done steal my spot huh
Hitler and Stalin in one line together? They could be in one tier by dictatorship, but not their racial prejudicies. While Hitler literally exterminated certain ethnic groups for their origin, Stalin separated people to loyal and useful for KPSS (his party), Ussr and communism in general and unloyal ones.
First groups who suffered from his rule were unloyal classes from Soviet citizens themselves (Russians, Ukrainians, Kazakhs, Caucasians etc) and only after that Poles, Baltics, Finns. He cooperated with communists from these countries, his agenda was to make them communists or move from his way obstacles, oppress, resettle, but not exterminate them whatever it takes.
What lol Stalin was even more anti semtic then Hitler and racist against others please tell me where in the ussr was the Arab soldiers or the Indians etc etc u could find many diverse people under Nazis
Please read about Polish Operation of the NKVD or NKVD Order No. 00439, because I think you lack this really important information
@@Montaggg33 Before NKVD killed Polish elite, Reds eliminated Russian and Ukrainian elite. So nothing new here, it was class vs class
@@famitsus987are you restarted
I wonder why Israel was not on the list.
Mid list, Leopold was more indifferent to human suffering of another race and operating in a region of that race. There's the classic, Pol Pot, then there's the Emperor of Japan, Hirohito, who presided over Japan's excesses of racist imperialism during WWII, soooo many african warlords, Malcolm X with his promotion of the Nation of Islam with its absurd black supremacist beliefs, Christopher Columbus and friends, and so so many more. The richness and diversity of evil and abhorrent racism is one of humanity's greatest treasures. Swim, get cancelled, give us the good stuff!
Based Leopold!
"based" is a shitty slang
@@NBrioDaZueraRulesWhat ???? Because it was popularised/ coined by a black guy . That's
RACIST !!!!
6:15 Fun fact about the hands chopping off thing, that was actually something one of his governor implented and he hated it. Not out of moral or ethical reasons, but because how's a slave supposed to work for him without hands?????
this is literally my new favorite channel
I thought Stalin hated everyone equally?
But some more equal than others, that's why he's so high up there
Stalin only hated those who were hostile to communism. Stalin's favorite movie was literally "The Circus" (1936) about a white woman with a black child.
stalin shouldnt even be on this list tbh
@@PagIiacci He actively attempted to eradicate several national identities, purposely drew borders so that on independence they'd be dysfunctional failed states, and forcibly expelled and deported millions of people before and after WW2. There was also discrimination against religious minorities such as the jewish community, but not because of ethnicity, it was instead about their religion being at odds with the atheist state.
Bruh Stalin is the biggest responsible for the defeat of the nazis in WW2 you should be thanking him for not speaking German right now or even being alive
Ah Somali Twitter, also known as the Uncle Ruckus Fan Club.
No HP Lovecraft or Pol Pot?
No, you don’t understand our dynamics at all so don’t call us Uncle Ruckus when 3 precent of Somalis in S.A. have been brutally murdered by Blacks. My grandfather fought against Apartheid, we truly weren’t raised to hate Africans. But when AMISON Congolese commit war crimes… We get a little mad
nah it mostly a defence against other africans who attack somalis for no reason
Me after winning 15 ranked racist matches in a row🍷🗿
Bro really said “hygiene is racist and because I don’t want to die I am also racist”
As an Indian, let me add a point in defence of some twitter users liking titler.
We were colonised by the British and WW2 is what weakened Britain enough for us to get our independence.
Somali ‘racism’ comes from defending our identity from Bantus and false labels such as ‘black’.
Well we are black and from Africa, coming from a Somali
@weidie2moro yes but someone with black skin in usa almost has no resemblance to a Somali who is black
@@asfasw pretty all Somalis I know are black
@@weidie2moro you may be a black Somalian Bantu langaab but that’s not me
@@mussyeg but my dad is from buurco and my mom is from Mogadishu
Unranked racists when they meet ranked racists.
*put's himself into the "some prejudices" section*
*starts assignign racism levels to groups of inhabitants of whole countries*
That's exactly my type of humour :D
what about bill gates and klaus schwab?
Bro is not educated enough on Gandhi bruh
You forgot to put me on the list
Thank you for mentioning the holodomor, it is an important topic for my people and country to raise awareness about
As a latino, im ofended that we are not there
Before hitler came along, the person everyone knew and commonly considered the most evil person ever was leopold
there is a poem about The Fuzzy Wuzzy Angels its not an insult to any solder but a word or praise , This poem depicts the heroic efforts of the Fuzzy Wuzzy angels, native bearers who rescued wounded Australian soldiers during World War II. Characterized by their distinctive appearance, the bearers display compassion and resilience in caring for the injured. The poem highlights their unwavering determination to protect and transport the soldiers, despite the absence of traditional halos or religious imagery.
This is a milestone for the racism community.
Can someone explain the Mao placement. I can’t find too much on google
As a Somali, I see this as an absolute win
😂 but were equally racist against all the blacks only get it more because theyre the only ones who cry about it
as an indian we are rascists and we are not hyper sensitive like you guys getting offended by a single sound wave coming from a white person. we actually enjoy racism(in a fun way) and we don't worship hitler . we suppourt non violence yes we are avid israel suppourters because they have helped us but I fully condemn violence whether it is from hamas/israel/russia/ukraine anyone . we are racists but we have huge empathy too . in world war when poland was demolished one indian maharaja gave shelters to them and opened schools for them. we welcomed parsis . we have welcomed jews too.
Would you put Benjamin Tillman in the all stars or competitive racists?
Dr. Doofenshmirtz voice “This list is going to be objective, and by objective I mean *pulls leaver* COMPLETELY MY OWN OPINION” *traps Agent P*
As a somali, this is so real! 😭
But were racist against all arabs, europeans, chinese and Indians not just blacks.
Blacks however try to claim us hence the focus
Not really, we hate everyone equally.
@@negativephantom9590that’s still racism bro
Yeah sorry guys 💀
xXJareerxXxSlayerXx
Casual racism? We're going ranked with this one 🗣🗣🗣
King Leopold was a colossal dick and all, but his exploits have been exaggerated to a comical degree. There weren't anywhere near enough people in the country for him to kill that many, Belgian Congo was extremely underdeveloped back then, there was no way they could support enough people for those death tolls to be possible.
It's a subject many read somewhere but actually don't know anything about and lost all critical thinking somewhere...
I'm definitely a racism all star. Made 10 all star selections in my lifetime. 3 All racism teams. Averaged 28 racial slurs a day
You probably shouldn't have used an entire country's flag as the place marker for a specific group of people.
But anyway, I liked this because you said most people have some prejudices. My own prejudices might be pretty mild, but they still exist.
I ranked into causal racist.
@@weswolverine dont worry we all start somewhere you'll get higher eventually 💪🏻
It's important to compare the nature and extent of racism between Adolf Hitler and King Leopold II, which requires a thorough analysis of the historical contexts in which these two figures operated.
Adolf Hitler, as the leader of the Nazi regime in Germany, embodied extreme and systemic racism. His Nazi ideology was based on the belief in the superiority of the Aryan "race" and the necessity to eliminate those he deemed inferior, especially Jews, Roma, Slavs, and other ethnic groups and minorities. Hitler orchestrated the systematic genocide of six million Jews and millions of others during the Holocaust, an unimaginable atrocity motivated by his racist and anti-Semitic vision.
On the other hand, King Leopold II of Belgium is often associated with the brutal exploitation of the Congo under Belgian colonial rule. His reign was marked by coercive practices, atrocities, and systematic abuses of Congolese populations, often in the name of economic profit. Leopold II established a system of exploiting the natural resources of the Congo that resulted in immeasurable suffering for the Congolese, including forced labor, mutilations, and massacres.
While Leopold II's actions were motivated by greed, racism, and disdain for indigenous peoples were also present in his colonial policy. However, it is essential to note that Hitler's systematic racism and ideology of racial supremacy formed the basis of a regime that deliberately sought to exterminate millions of people due to their ethnic, religious, or cultural identity.
In conclusion, while both historical figures were responsible for grave atrocities and racist practices, the nature and scale of racism embodied by Adolf Hitler, particularly through the Holocaust, place him in a distinct category of racial brutality. His Nazi regime was characterized by an ideology of racial hatred that led to the deaths of millions of innocent people, which partly explains why he is often considered to be more racist than King Leopold II.
You can wash your feet as you wash your hands. This kind of thinking makes us forget that fights can include more than fists.
Also, that's CLEARLY A REGIONAL thing. Racial bias is about appearance.
where can i find somali twitter
look up darknn, that shit is hilarious😭
i am racist
Put me in S tier.
I'm more racist
Putting ghandi so low and Stalin in all star is crazy
fake, number 1 is obviously me
>Ashley Graves pfp
...not that the character is racist, but given some of the fandom... this checks out
I'm a big fan of K-ON too
@@alicemalice2597 Never watched it but I have heard some good things. Might have to check it out. Unless you're making a joke and it went over my head lol
incest savage
@@michaelvstemerman we’re a very competitively racist community, so you’ll need to try your best to keep up
3:50 It reminds me of that funny Askari soldier saluting the Italian UN soldiers in the 90s
bro started rapid firing names 💀💀💀
The force Publique was almost entirely comprised of native Africans. Also, the 5-10 million stay is demographically impossible
6:27 Not to defend the King of Racism but the Congo population in 1890 was around 8 million, and while the population graphs and models do show a small drop drop, it's not by half, so I kind of doubt that Leopold the 2 managed to kill more people in Congo than existed there at the time.
It was a 25 year ish rule so it was atleast one generation cycle if not 1.3 so its entirely plausible
@@StoicStick Now, tell us how many The British Empire, and/or Queen Victoria murdered. Far more than Leopold. What absolute tosh you served up here.
Im not a historian, nor 100% sure if he was actually racist or crazy but Hirohito the Japanese emperor of Japan from 1926 - 1989 should be considered for this list for the amount of non Japanese people were killed in the Pacific islands and Asia. I think estimates are like 25-30 million.
I'm surprised that no Albanian or anyone from the Balkans was in this list
But then it wouldn't be list, it would be an encyclopedia with all of our names on it.
How were Stalin and Mao racist?
You forgot Winston Chrurchill
No mention of the entirety of the Balkans?
There are racial differences between humans, not sure why racism is a bad thing.
You're going on the tier list
@@major_kukri2430LEZZZZZZ GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Lol I hope this is a joke😂
@@gherve222 depends what he means. Its fine to point out differences between races, killing them is a little unkind tho
im high at its 3am rn and Im watching a racism tier list 😭