Shoe list video March 2024
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- Its finally here!! The updated Hruska Clinic Shoe List for March of 2024 is now available. In this video Lori describes the updates and changes to the shoe list. Remember this is a list of shoes to assist in helping people with upright, postural neutrality, based on the science of Postural Restoration (PRI). Every person is unique in their footwear needs, so this is not an exhaustive list, nor is it meant to be a list that is not evolving. Just because a shoe is on the list doesn't ensure it will work for you, and you may find a shoe that is not on the list is a good shoe for you. As always, a trained PRI practitioner evaluating you and your shoe is the best way to determine the proper shoe for you.
To get a copy of the list see our website at www.hruska-clinic.com/shoe-list
To learn more about the Postural Restoration Institute see www.posturalrestoration.com.
Just reviewing this again- so much good information as always, thank you, Lori! I love how excited you get about the shoes :)
Thanks Lori, you rock! I will add that the Asics Cumulus 23 is still my all time favorite and is still available on Amazon. Alot of my clients do really well with that one :)
Oh the 23s.... What a great shoe.... I don't think the 26s are quite there but defniately a step back in the right direction from the 25s (that were abysmal)...
Amazing that people like this exist in the world ❤
It’s not like I was checking the list every 24 hours or anything - me? No.. 😅
All tapered toe box fitness fashion shoes with elevated heels and cushioning meant for running. This is pretty confusing.
Let’s go!!!
A few basic questions, it doesn’t appear your concernedabout to box size? These shoes all seem to have narrow toe boxes? You say that the mechanics of walking are the same as running?? do you not recommend a mid foot to 4 foot contact or do you encourage heel striking with running? And lastly, what are your feelings on zero drop sole? quite popular these days it and it looks like you’re preferences is more towards the higher heel drop type sole? Thanks
I've been wearing the dyads for over 10 years and now I'm just stuck. Glyercins and adrenalin do not work for me (actually caused bunions) and running stores always want to put me in hokas. I have wide feet and can never seem to find the asics in my size.
Glad the cumulus has returned to the list!
Let us know what you think of the 26s. Its not the really stiff shoe like the old 23s but way better than the last few years. We are hoping it continues to be a good shoe! Ann in the clinic is loving hers with her PRI orthotics!
Amazing video, thank you. Which model would you suggest for somebody who has flat feet (pronation problem)? I have been using Brooks glycerin for years. However I tried recently in a shop both the Glycerin 21 and the Asics Gel Kayano 30: I had the impression that the Kayano was giving me more arch support but, like I said, I tried it in a shop so it's hard to say what happens when I walk or run. Also I sometimes wear orthotics so this makes the choice more complicated. And I worried about the huge drop both models have since I heard is not so good for the foot. I hope to hear some kind advice.
This might be a long shot but any recommendations on dress shoes that are also supportive and good for rehab like all these running shoes. Can’t wear sneakers while I’m at work
Was using the Gel Kayano 28, easily the best part about it that worked for me was that hard plastic medial support, that kept my right arch and mid foot from collapsing. You guys were absolutely right, the 29 was horrible. I tried them on and i could no longer feel my big toe at all. Im intrigued about if they made that better with more give near the big toe. I'm also curious if the Asics GT 2000 have that same medial support. Have been suing New Balance 860 for a while. They are fantastic shoes, great heel reference and bigger toe box, however i feel like im really missing that hard medial support that the kayano 28 gave me. Just curious about your thoughts. I def fall into the slightly less then average to low arch group, but more so on my right than left
The Kayano 30 is actually a fairly large step in the right direction after the horrible v29. Same as the Cumulus. We are trying them more and more with patients and having good results. It is an average arch height so if you were looking for more arch and you like the ASICS feel the newest GT-2000 is a great choice to try. With the newest NB880 shoe really turning into a poor rocker shoe we are concerned the newer 860s (that come out in June) may not be that great either. If you'd had luck with ASICS before I think its safe to return!
Hi Lori,
Thanks for the reference, and informative video
I have a high arch neutral foot.
Based on your recommendation, I've tested couple of shoes. But I got confused about 4 points
1. you recommended in this video "Hruska Clinic Shoe List 2023 updates" the "GEL-CUMULUS 24", and in this video the "GEL-CUMULUS 26", so which one is better if I find both?
2. You recommended "Kayano 31" but I see it in the cautioned category.
3. If I feel very comfortable in both "GEL-CUMULUS 26" and "Kyano 31" how to decide between them?
4. Will stable shoes can ruin my normal shoes because of the stability added to it?
Every year the shoes change. The GEL Cumulus 24 was a good shoe and recommended. THE next year the Cumulus 25 was not recommended and this years version the 26 is back on the list. They are different. some like the 24 better, some the 26 better. The Kayano 30 and 31 are both good shoes but offer more arch support than the Cumulus. Depends on what you need, but both are good. The best way to know which shoe is best for you is for you to try it on and have someone trained in PRI assess your objective tests to see. Otherwise you have to go off what works best fro you specifically..I don't understand your question 4. One shoe will not ruin another shoe.
@@HruskaClinic appreciate you time answering my questions.
If my foot is neutral with high arch without supination, if I feel Kayano 31 is more comfortable, will using stabilised shoes can harm my feet on the long run and change it to flat arch? I don't have PRI practitioner around :(
@@hazemhemied3293 No the main way I could see you creating "harm" to your feet would be running without enough support (like the old barefoot shoes on hard concrete). No worries with more comfort and support.
Hey Lori, i bought 3 cumulus 24's upon seeing your reviews and was under the impression that asics was going in the wrong direction with 25's with heavily foam padded shoes like hoka's. Could you please brief slightly on 24 vs 26 for high arches? Thanks a bunch
The 25s were a step in the wrong direction for sure. They appear to have moved back in a direction (probably because loyal Cumulus wearers hated the 25s) that we like. It seems the 26s should be very similar to the 24s. As we use them in the clinic we will update for sure. If you try them and have thoughts let us know!
I was wondering if you have tried out the Asics Kayano 31's as opposed to the 30's? I am trying to choose between Saucony Echelon 9 and Asics Kayano 31 but I am not sure which to go for. The fact that Asics Kayano 30's are on your list makes me lean towards the 31's
Philip we just got to see the Kayano 31s this past week and we approve. Its a great shoe. The saucony brand has tended to not be supportive enough over the last few years, so between the 2 I'd go with the Kayano 30 or 31
Hey Lori, I noticed you put the GT-2000 on the list but did not mention it in this video. Any reason why? I was curious about that one! Or do you have the same thoughts about that one as you do the Cumulus and Kayano?
The GT-2000 doesn't have the same "neurosensory" properties as the Kayano 30 or Cumulus 26 but has returned to some of the great qualities we loved with ASICS in the past. We will update with more info on it as we try it out in the clinic! Let us know your thoughts on it as well!
What’s the best shoe for low arch/flat feet individuals that also have limited big toe mobility?
For me the Dyad (wide) were perfect and I had been using them for walking for 10 years. Any recommendations now that I have to replace them? thanks a lot!
I know the Dyads were a great shoe for so many! Obviously the Brooks Ghost Max is not what we would recommend but the Brooks Ghost 15 with an orthotic or over the counter insert like a currex insert is an option depending on your arch support needs, and the ASICS Kayano 30 is another shoe with the same neuro-sensory qualities, but it may be a bit narrow if you need the width. Let us know if you find a comparable shoe that works for you!
Question - why are some shoes that you mention don't have good arch support e.g. cumulus recommended for the high arch category, and shoes with good arch support e.g. glycerin gts are recommended for the average arch category?
I don't have a PRI practitioner available to me where I am and when deciding for myself which shoes to go for I bought the cumulus and glycerin to try (one from each category) to see which feels best, thinking that I belong to the high arch category and want to improve my pronation. But now I'm a bit confused
Good question. This is where trial and error (ideally testing) comes in. Just because you may have a "high arch" or limited pronation doesn't mean you need more arch "support". In fact arch "support" (especially from a hard orthotic or over arched shoe can limit pronation and keep you in a "high arch" or supinated state. So, a shoe like a Cumulus with minimal arch "support" will allow your foot to relearn to pronate (if the rest of the body can shift). However you also need to be able to "sense" your arch to give it a reason to pronate or sensation to pronate into. So an average arch shoe (like a glycerin) might allow you to sense your arch better to assist with pronation better than the cumulus. Remember we want arch Sense not arch support! Hope that helps
@@HruskaClinic Thanks a lot! I tested both, and the Cumulus came out on top in hip internal/external rotation testing, but also just how they felt. It was pretty clear that my feet were pronating better than in the Glycerins. I think it's the gel you spoke about that the feet just sink into. It allows me to sense the arches fully. A few days of using them and now I'm noticeably pronating better when barefoot, too. I'm hopeful this will help me retrain my leg mechanics for the long term (dealing with knee issues due to externally rotated tibia/pronation issues). Very grateful I found your list. Thank you!
Thank you for the video. But the ubiquitous Hoka didn't make it to the list? Are they no good for sensory purposes?
Based on the rocker design, the Hoka shoes are really only good for people who have limited big toe mobility. Lori discusses this briefly in this video and in greater extent in the history of the shoe list/qualities of a good shoe video. Since they are very popular and not great for most people from a PRI perspective we choose not to highlight them much. You can see they are on the list under a separate category.
@@HruskaClinic Thank you very much.
Do you have recommendations for sandals for summer wear? Thank you for all this, by the way! I moved away from asics and now I am back and feel better than ever!
Every spring we get this question...
ruclips.net/video/n-0JQ5pzLq8/видео.htmlsi=QyCtm4FsipRruu9S