One can only imagine the money we would save as a society if we would cancel these useless (and harmful) programs and reinvest the money saved in Nursing, medicine, engineering.
@@Fakeslimshadyshe explained it in the beginning in regards to feminist theories. Real theories are tested and compared with studies that contradict them in the interest of finding the truth. Most philosophy taught in colleges today is a political agenda and presented as fact to be learned & accepted, rather than theories to be discussed and compared.
That's the problem when the moonbats get their filthy paws on a word, they insidiously eat away at the meaning until it is just a noise or warped beyond repair. Fuzzy language is their friend, they'd be shunned if they used language to clearly communicate their beliefs, ideas, and intentions.
Abolish all courses which end in the word "Studies". They(along with many other things)inflate the cost of university, and leave students with degrees which are largely unmarketable
The job of universities isn't to provide marketable degrees. We need industrial or professional schools that do this instead. The job of universities is research and education for future researchers.
@saintsword23 Yeah, I'm a strong proponent of increasing access to vocational training. I've been dismayed and frustrated by The MRM's refusal to get serious about this particular mission(Even though they've spent millions of hours griping about GamerGate and Black Panther being recast as a chick), even though more readily accessible vocational training would benefit men more than anyone Ya never know, kids... More men joining the middle and upper middle class, after receiving through educations in the skilled trades(Rather than being in and out of prison)just might also change our society's less than laudatory view of men also
Good point. One wonders why conservative women failed to push back against the destructive, feminist ideology until the point where it overwhelmed the society, alienated men and women from each other, and nearly destroyed marriage and the family unit that's the basis of Western civilization. I've never heard any explanation for this.
OR…how about we just get back to meritocracy and allow ppl who can do the jobs well to do them?? Because you seem to be conflating two separate issues-equality of opportunity, and equity. Equity itself is an evil construct, but if you’re arguing against women having the equal opportunity to sit in boardrooms bc the number of female coal miners is a fraction of their male counterparts, then I fail to see how useful that is to anyone. In other words, save all that resentment for the ppl pushing equity on everyone, and stop conflating equity with equality. Are you going to deny men a career in healthcare bc it’s a female dominated career? Or bc there are no female football players? Come on, that’s silly.
@@liz9284 my point was that the crowd that demands equity are only interested in the boardroom, not the coal mine. I would be fine with a meritocracy. I have always been fine with equal opportunity for everyone, but that’s not what we are seeing.
I feel just the same. Men maintain the infrastructure, and feminists diss them in air conditioned luxury - or say they'd rather meet bears in the wilderness.
When see notices on a college classroom doors that say “women and minorities only” you don’t have to go far to figure out who they’re excluding. Makes you wonder; What could they be talking about that makes them intentionally excluded that demographic?
Mens folly includes womens folly. Nature will settle this whichever way. In the meantime I kind of miss any communal sense of balance and harmony. Maybe in the next life.
I'm old enough to remember that back in the 80's one of the big feminist howling points was that all medical research and treatment was based exclusively on male physiology and took no account of the differences between men and women. At least the feminists got something right!
I heard the phrase "a lament for Feminism". People often imagine a day once upon a time when the Suffragettes reigned and all was good. But what if this were never the case? Trivially the very word “Feminism” by definition excludes half of the human population. More, if you include gays. Consider. 1. Suffragettes in 1920 2. Women's Libbers in 1970 3. University Feminists in 1990 4. Internet Feminists in 2010 In each case one was the daughter of the prior generation. Building upon an edifice. But what happens if the edifice were built upon false premises and false evidence and false reasoning? Trivially one inspects. 1. The Suffragettes arose from the WKKK and were related to the Prohibitionists. They were racist, classist, sexist, xenophobes who were driven by self interest at the expense of men (and women) at the bottom of the Life Pyramid. 2. The Women's Libbers were Gloria Steinem et al. They got the vote and wanted work and to be at the top of the Life Pyramid. Society was engineered to make it so, by some ill-considered statistical measures. Conversely, they had zero interest in engineering society so as to be equal at the bottom of the Life Pyramid. 3. The University Feminists were the “loud and proud” daughters of the Women's Libbers. They attended Yale in numbers. They got tenure and created fields of study based upon their beliefs. The created academic manifestos to re-engineer society and to explain away civilization via oppression and hatred by one group against another. No other thinking was ever allowed. This echo chamber controlled education from grade school to grad school. It had results. 4. The Internet begat internet Feminists. 3rd Wavers. The N-th wave always hates the (N-1)th wave! They have unabashed misandry. Not like Misogyny ever was. Not like Racism in 2000. But like Racism in 1900. Outright. Even questioning them will get YOU repercussions. Like a colored man speaking against the behavior of a white woman in 1900.
The suffragettes were domestic terrorists. Many men couldn't vote then, but had accountabilities the women did not. The women got the vote without the accountabilities. Janice's studies of early feminism are fascinating.
At the VERY least, they need to stop handing out student loans for degree programs that don’t offer a valid career path. Which should be enough to stop all this, but unfortunately, once you have ppl paying for these programs, the bureaucracy needed to maintain them magically spring up, so it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.
i had throat cancer at the beginning of last year (viral so the cure rate is good). Often with cancer treatment your body is damaged for the treatment to be successful. One of our local universities (UWA) may be doing Sometimes similar. It has cut out the humanities department.
I love your comments about the feminist activist types who complain about there not being enough women in engineering, these activists are almost always themselves from the arts and humanities.
If heterosexuality is a social construct then so must be homosexuality, In that case gay conversion therapy should be considered a valid procedure. I wonder how that would go down? lol
Well it is important to distinguish cultural curriculum from practical applied we must concede that the business of post secondary course shopping is very lucrative and fills the halls of learning with letters of diverse class attendance and expensive text books. Highly unemployable hubris filled fixed debt youngsters need a self reflection class of "WTF I am doing. These classes are B.S." and not the good B.S. one gets from Universities.
The really ironic thing is that the young people who major in this topic are really surprised that they’re not employable if they ever finish school. It’s as if no one has told them that it is only a privilege of the very wealthy to major in a field that there is no work. So, public assistance is what they fight for and they’re just turning out activists.
If heterosexuality is learned, then homosexuality is also an aquired taste. Should then, Christian communities be allowed to have their conversion courses for gay men? In the end, it is just a performed thing.
I'm not normally one for conspiracy thories but i do sometimes wonder whether all of this wasn't dreamt up in a eugenicist star chamber sometime after the second world war.
Hello Janice: On the subject of female astronauts, the Soviets preferred female cosmonauts. Women are smaller and light so it easier to send women into space. Also, being smaller and lighter, while in space women need less oxygen and water. Finally, on the subject of priorities, who gets first place in the life boats? Keep up the good work.
Perhaps it's for the best that academia keeps the people who create this stuff sheltered from society. Unleashed upon the world we might be in real trouble.
Women’s studies is all about feelings. It’s hard to believe that people who teach this rubbish get paid. I wonder how successful courses like this would be successful in war torn Ukraine?
Universities are very different. Engineering Universities do not waste student's time with useless studies classes. Physics, Calculus, Chemistry, Circuits and Python code classes have no room or time for head games. Liberal arts universities do. Administrators make up useless classes students like because they get more money from high enrollment. Students tend to choose classes that affirm their existing beliefs. Instead of teaching how to think critically, question everything and debate with reason and evidence, students are coddled like soft brained pillows.
There are so many painful holes in what you assert. The idea that universities should be vocational derives from the realm of cliches and stereotyping. Also the idea that a degree should be something that can be turned into money is the dogma of psychotic capitalism. Regardless of what you think, universities are the training grounds for academics; where one goes to learn how to deal with data and process it in particular ways that are defined by rational and refined thought. It is a place that formalises the steps through which the human condition is explored and examined with the ultimate goal of understanding the nature of being. In that journey many skills are acquired and honed. Often the skills are priceless in other contexts - yet that transference is not easily known or readily predicted. A society without universities that value the world of ideas is typically brutal, lacking in humanity and devoid of creativity - the very things that define us as human. So please, withdraw your facile bleating about what you believe to be evil intent of Administrators, useless studies and pretending you know what has value in regards to the sphere of knowledge and learning.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I’m conistently impressed by Janice’s extreme mental organization and clarity. She is formidable.
One can only imagine the money we would save as a society if we would cancel these useless (and harmful) programs and reinvest the money saved in Nursing, medicine, engineering.
And especially, GENUINE philosophy.
@@TheVeganVicar Just curious, what is the difference between "real" philosophy and the modern philosophy we see in campuses today?
@@Fakeslimshadyshe explained it in the beginning in regards to feminist theories. Real theories are tested and compared with studies that contradict them in the interest of finding the truth. Most philosophy taught in colleges today is a political agenda and presented as fact to be learned & accepted, rather than theories to be discussed and compared.
The price of a degree would drop dramatically.
But the Cultural Marxist INTENTION is to harm the society. It's the whole point.
We've got to figure out how to rescue our companies from these stupid HR departments. Getting rid of the useless activist degrees is a start
the amount of resources being wasted on idiotic initiatives from those departments is amazing and yet they are still mutiplying
Get rid of HR departments, IBM already has replaced theirs with AI bots.
@@renegadedalek5528 that's the perfect replacement for most of government employees too
@@canemcave we've got kindergarten teachers making work rules for adults
@@primetimeseal8616 this is the age of the empowered idiots
HOW can we have _WOMEN'S_ GENDER STUDIES when NOBODY seems to be able to DEFINE WHAT A _WOMAN_ IS?
That's the problem when the moonbats get their filthy paws on a word, they insidiously eat away at the meaning until it is just a noise or warped beyond repair. Fuzzy language is their friend, they'd be shunned if they used language to clearly communicate their beliefs, ideas, and intentions.
INDEED!
Chest Feeders' Studies 101...
nobody knows that's why it's a research subject with all sort of wild theories, just like quantum physics
@@canemcave At least quantum physics is a predictive model with some practical utility
Compelling analysis, and a supercool t-shirt. What's not to love?
Notice how there aren't any GENDER STUDIES CLASSES
Dedicated to supporting MEN.
Destroying white men is largely the purpose of Cultural Marxism.
Abolish all courses which end in the word "Studies". They(along with many other things)inflate the cost of university, and leave students with degrees which are largely unmarketable
The job of universities isn't to provide marketable degrees. We need industrial or professional schools that do this instead. The job of universities is research and education for future researchers.
Or worse, they get them jobs in HR departments.
@saintsword23 Yeah, I'm a strong proponent of increasing access to vocational training. I've been dismayed and frustrated by The MRM's refusal to get serious about this particular mission(Even though they've spent millions of hours griping about GamerGate and Black Panther being recast as a chick), even though more readily accessible vocational training would benefit men more than anyone
Ya never know, kids... More men joining the middle and upper middle class, after receiving through educations in the skilled trades(Rather than being in and out of prison)just might also change our society's less than laudatory view of men also
@geobloxmodels1186 Yep... That's a recipe for modern life becoming even more of a Hiernoymous Bosch painting than it already is also
Ultimately, students get what they want. If they hate men, they'll get courses that reinforce that hatred.
I can't believe I'm only now finding this content.
This is a re-published video. Many videos by Janice are no longer extant, due to censorship.
Good point. One wonders why conservative women failed to push back against the destructive, feminist ideology until the point where it overwhelmed the society, alienated men and women from each other, and nearly destroyed marriage and the family unit that's the basis of Western civilization. I've never heard any explanation for this.
I will be supportive of equality in the boardroom when I see equality in the coal mines.
OR…how about we just get back to meritocracy and allow ppl who can do the jobs well to do them?? Because you seem to be conflating two separate issues-equality of opportunity, and equity. Equity itself is an evil construct, but if you’re arguing against women having the equal opportunity to sit in boardrooms bc the number of female coal miners is a fraction of their male counterparts, then I fail to see how useful that is to anyone. In other words, save all that resentment for the ppl pushing equity on everyone, and stop conflating equity with equality. Are you going to deny men a career in healthcare bc it’s a female dominated career? Or bc there are no female football players? Come on, that’s silly.
@@liz9284 my point was that the crowd that demands equity are only interested in the boardroom, not the coal mine.
I would be fine with a meritocracy. I have always been fine with equal opportunity for everyone, but that’s not what we are seeing.
I would never support the idea of equity. It is another form of prejudice.
@@Guildofarcanelore Oh she understands the comparison, just playing dumb to accuse us of "resentment". For some reason.
I feel just the same. Men maintain the infrastructure, and feminists diss them in air conditioned luxury - or say they'd rather meet bears in the wilderness.
Very well said.
When see notices on a college classroom doors that say “women and minorities only” you don’t have to go far to figure out who they’re excluding. Makes you wonder; What could they be talking about that makes them intentionally excluded that demographic?
And the excluded demographic built the classroom! 🤣
@@WallyPyneoil and most of what’s around them.
Miss Fiamingo, you are a blessing!
Excellent work. 👊 bizzare stuff 🤦♂️ and women are eagerly swallowing this rubbish
Women's Studies is the new phrenology. It's pseudoscience at best.
You don't need to be a scientist, just a parent, to know that boys and girls are intrinsically different.
Oh, wait...
Great channel and content Miss Fiamingo
Too much money to be made off of gullible fools that pursue these "degrees"
I attend a Men's Studies class - it involves watching "Family Guy" and basically doing whatever the f!@% I want.
That’s a lie and you’re no Man.
Why am I not surprised that "Men's Studies" should be dominated by Leftist thought?
So many of these woke intersectionalists have no idea where their worldview came from.
Mens folly includes womens folly. Nature will settle this whichever way. In the meantime I kind of miss any communal sense of balance and harmony. Maybe in the next life.
I'm old enough to remember that back in the 80's one of the big feminist howling points was that all medical research and treatment was based exclusively on male physiology and took no account of the differences between men and women. At least the feminists got something right!
I heard the phrase "a lament for Feminism". People often imagine a day once upon a time when the Suffragettes reigned and all was good. But what if this were never the case? Trivially the very word “Feminism” by definition excludes half of the human population. More, if you include gays.
Consider.
1. Suffragettes in 1920
2. Women's Libbers in 1970
3. University Feminists in 1990
4. Internet Feminists in 2010
In each case one was the daughter of the prior generation. Building upon an edifice. But what happens if the edifice were built upon false premises and false evidence and false reasoning? Trivially one inspects.
1. The Suffragettes arose from the WKKK and were related to the Prohibitionists. They were racist, classist, sexist, xenophobes who were driven by self interest at the expense of men (and women) at the bottom of the Life Pyramid.
2. The Women's Libbers were Gloria Steinem et al. They got the vote and wanted work and to be at the top of the Life Pyramid. Society was engineered to make it so, by some ill-considered statistical measures. Conversely, they had zero interest in engineering society so as to be equal at the bottom of the Life Pyramid.
3. The University Feminists were the “loud and proud” daughters of the Women's Libbers. They attended Yale in numbers. They got tenure and created fields of study based upon their beliefs. The created academic manifestos to re-engineer society and to explain away civilization via oppression and hatred by one group against another. No other thinking was ever allowed. This echo chamber controlled education from grade school to grad school. It had results.
4. The Internet begat internet Feminists. 3rd Wavers. The N-th wave always hates the (N-1)th wave! They have unabashed misandry. Not like Misogyny ever was. Not like Racism in 2000. But like Racism in 1900. Outright. Even questioning them will get YOU repercussions. Like a colored man speaking against the behavior of a white woman in 1900.
The suffragettes were domestic terrorists. Many men couldn't vote then, but had accountabilities the women did not. The women got the vote without the accountabilities. Janice's studies of early feminism are fascinating.
why weren't there a billion views 10 years ago .
Dr. Fiamengo is a hero.
Waiting…
At the VERY least, they need to stop handing out student loans for degree programs that don’t offer a valid career path. Which should be enough to stop all this, but unfortunately, once you have ppl paying for these programs, the bureaucracy needed to maintain them magically spring up, so it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.
i had throat cancer at the beginning of last year (viral so the cure rate is good). Often with cancer treatment your body is damaged for the treatment to be successful. One of our local universities (UWA) may be doing Sometimes similar. It has cut out the humanities department.
If people haven't come accross the "Grievance studies hoax" I recomend checking it out. Hilariously funny and deeply disturbing at the same time.
I love your comments about the feminist activist types who complain about there not being enough women in engineering, these activists are almost always themselves from the arts and humanities.
If heterosexuality is a social construct then so must be homosexuality, In that case gay conversion therapy should be considered a valid procedure. I wonder how that would go down? lol
Eh.... I had the exact same thought. Lets convert those gays
Well it is important to distinguish cultural curriculum from practical applied we must concede that the business of post secondary course shopping is very lucrative and fills the halls of learning with letters of diverse class attendance and expensive text books. Highly unemployable hubris filled fixed debt youngsters need a self reflection class of "WTF I am doing. These classes are B.S." and not the good B.S. one gets from Universities.
Outstanding video.
The really ironic thing is that the young people who major in this topic are really surprised that they’re not employable if they ever finish school.
It’s as if no one has told them that it is only a privilege of the very wealthy to major in a field that there is no work.
So, public assistance is what they fight for and they’re just turning out activists.
If heterosexuality is learned, then homosexuality is also an aquired taste. Should then, Christian communities be allowed to have their conversion courses for gay men?
In the end, it is just a performed thing.
Oh, no, no! That's totally different! 😯😩😰
It's the sprawl, the bleed of this field that is the most indicative of the Marxist takeover and domination of Academia. The most egregious, too.
Yes
I'm not normally one for conspiracy thories but i do sometimes wonder whether all of this wasn't dreamt up in a eugenicist star chamber sometime after the second world war.
Hello Janice: On the subject of female astronauts, the Soviets preferred female cosmonauts. Women are smaller and light so it easier to send women into space. Also, being smaller and lighter, while in space women need less oxygen and water. Finally, on the subject of priorities, who gets first place in the life boats? Keep up the good work.
When will we close the Life Expectancy Gap? Smash the Matriarchy?
Absolutely-let’s work on extending men’s life expectancy!
What she is describing is a religion.
Same is true of The Red Pill
Nonsense. Fund Men’s Studies. Nothing’s more important than equality.
Perhaps it's for the best that academia keeps the people who create this stuff sheltered from society. Unleashed upon the world we might be in real trouble.
They have unleashed it into the world
The. Bankers at the Wef did this.
Women’s studies is all about feelings. It’s hard to believe that people who teach this rubbish get paid.
I wonder how successful courses like this would be successful in war torn Ukraine?
Student abuse.
I always found her stunningly attractive.
Universities are very different.
Engineering Universities do not waste student's time with useless studies classes. Physics, Calculus, Chemistry, Circuits and Python code classes have no room or time for head games.
Liberal arts universities do. Administrators make up useless classes students like because they get more money from high enrollment. Students tend to choose classes that affirm their existing beliefs.
Instead of teaching how to think critically, question everything and debate with reason and evidence, students are coddled like soft brained pillows.
There are so many painful holes in what you assert. The idea that universities should be vocational derives from the realm of cliches and stereotyping. Also the idea that a degree should be something that can be turned into money is the dogma of psychotic capitalism. Regardless of what you think, universities are the training grounds for academics; where one goes to learn how to deal with data and process it in particular ways that are defined by rational and refined thought. It is a place that formalises the steps through which the human condition is explored and examined with the ultimate goal of understanding the nature of being. In that journey many skills are acquired and honed. Often the skills are priceless in other contexts - yet that transference is not easily known or readily predicted. A society without universities that value the world of ideas is typically brutal, lacking in humanity and devoid of creativity - the very things that define us as human. So please, withdraw your facile bleating about what you believe to be evil intent of Administrators, useless studies and pretending you know what has value in regards to the sphere of knowledge and learning.
Comment
S
'it is like learning voodoo'
no it isn't. voodoo and Christianity and similar are fine to teach in non required classes.
sexism and racism are not.
"ladies and gentleman"
It's all fuckin nonsense.