@LouB747 When the sun and the observer are at the good angle, diffraction on the icelets of the contrails can be seen ad gives this irised picture. Like a real raibow needs that the sun is behind the observer
@@nospamnc2075 but yet we clearly see with the naked eye of them spraying cloud like substance in the sky which stays with upon hours on, hell sometimes even make it rain and now here we got fool like you talkin about a doesn't exist ? damn Patrick are you really living on your rock??😂😂pitiful
That is probably one of the most incredible and impressive things I've ever seen! What I find fascinating are the rolling vortices being generated in the plane's wake. In many ways it is almost angelic, but in other ways it is like the Dreamliner is splitting it's own part of the sky in half. It's beautiful but yet haunting at the same time. What a fantastic capture! By the way, your interview with Kevin and Rudy on AVL was fantastic! It would be wonderful to hear you talk more about your experiences and profession in the very near future! Thank You!
@@nospamnc2075 I don't think it's strange. The sheer size of it can be frightening to some. I personally think it looks awesome, but I can understand the person above.
That "con" trail just started up a few hundred yards before you started filming...amazing. However, makes sense if a sprayer system was turned on and boy oh boy...those are some persistent "con" trails eh?
Try to reverse your logic: LouB747 started filming a few seconds after he spotted the contrail forming. Does it make sense to you? Contrail tends to be large and persistent in an air oversaturated with supercooled water vapours. This is typical for early mornings before the sun messes it all up. Does it make sense to you?
@@curiouscat8457 thats just it... contrails arent persistent as the temps normalize...but it persisted and began dispersing...its not difficult to understand this with observation.
@@Faxxer248 May I suggest you start with simple stuff, like putting together a coherent sentence, before venturing into something like atmospheric science?
Wow, that looks like some kind of weird snake 😁 Captain Lou, your visit with AVL's Kevin and Rudy today was fantastic. You are so interesting and fun. I hope you will do that again sometime in the future. Thank you 👍
Morten Rollsen It's down right fuckin scary that people can be THAT stupid. Obviously referring to chemtrails and flat Urrfffers(Earth in proper English). Also they are procreating!
+David Horgan It's not stupid to believe that the government is spraying us with chemicals.......in the 50's they literally sprayed kids with DDT because government-sponsored scientists deemed it so "safe and effective," when they downright knew it was dangerous. It's downright fuckin scary that today's generations are stupid enough to think their government would NEVER do something like that, when they have on multiple occasions. At best it's called willful negligence. The question of HOW they are doing it is where your cited chemtrails "stupidity" comes from; but the science behind detecting the particles in question is a thing.
+Paid Gov't Debunker Why is it stupid to believe the government is doing something now which they have done in the past (and with fluoride--continue to do now)? It's pure dogma that you would go so far to idolize government. All the evidence points to them being corrupt. Many whistleblowers have come forth and many more are afraid to. Jack-asses like you argue from what you think is an "intellectual high-ground." You think you are smart, you can debunk crazy conspiracy theories that couldn't possibly be true. I used to think like you back when I was a dumb ass, and then I started investigating these matters and saw conclusive evidence for myself. I'm not saying I have a certainty the chemtrails is real, but I think it is likely that it is. If you wanted to disprove it you could go out and do so. If you were in any position to "debunk" chemtrails you could go out and invalidate the sample testing that has taken place on Mount Shasta and other areas. Science is about repeatability, and if you aren't willing to repeat the tests then you can't claim to have "debunked" them. Your position is clearly a position of arrogance and not one of empirical evidence. I think that was already obvious to anyone with half a brain.
+Paid Gov't Debunker "WHAT?!?!?" Yes? You don't need to bold your sentences, I can read them just fine. "Not a single credible "whistleblower" has come forth about "chemtrails"." None of them credible? And how did you determine that? Did you did into their past? Did you find evidence they are liars? Were you confident enough to publish an exposé? "Well, I DO have the truth on my side, so the jackass here seems to be you." .....so you're a truther? "Did "conclusive evidence" come from goofy, kook websites? Please share your most compelling sources of "evidence" with me, and I'll prove that you are a gullible fool." I wasn't referring to chemtrails there buddy. I've done my own research. You've buried your head in the sand, evidently. "OMG! Are you kidding?" 'OMG! I have to actually use science to debunk something?' "There isn't a single credible test of any sort supporting the chemtrail fantasy... other than on fringy kook websites." How can you know they aren't credible if you haven't tested them to make sure? That's how science works dumb ass. "Evidently you still are a dumb ass" And yet you're claiming you've debunked something when you really haven't. Also, that response was too predictable to be a valid insult. And before I go.....here's your own mainstream media demonstrating government malicious intent, spraying people with toxic pollutants from planes: ruclips.net/video/tBzvdagmfOA/видео.html Here's a few "whistleblowers" talking about more government malfeasance: ruclips.net/video/jw471A3tjPk/видео.html ruclips.net/video/gg2M7nphmFw/видео.html Here's old US Government propaganda for mass poisoning the populace with fluoride: ruclips.net/video/79fBcKcKLPw/видео.html What Fluoride Action Network has to say about it: fluoridealert.org/issues/health/brain/ Another kooky website? Or is it just kooky because you call it that? This is why we're suspicious of yet more government malfeasance as there is no reason to believe they are magically less corrupt now than they were in the 50's. I'm sorry you think you're infallible, but if you actually were, you wouldn't be afraid to go out and truly debunk these claims. It doesn't matter how clever or how prejudiced you are, your comments alone are not sufficient to debunk this hypothesis. If you can't take a hypothesis seriously for long enough to empirically test it, you are not fit to be making unsubstantiated claims that it is a false theory. And just because their haven't been many tests yet, only shows that there is not enough information. It would seem that no matter what evidence is presented or how much, you will never abandon your faith. Regardless, I think most people will be smart enough to come around and notice when they're being lied to and what science really says about the matter.
@@geo3106 He means all natural because the trail is what "naturally" occurs to moist air when the aircraft pass through them, not exactly the most natural example of condensation but eh
I assume you are just kidding. But Poe's Law is definitely in effect and there was a fad where people were eating tide pods, so I just can't assume a minimum level if idiocy. So I guess, really, I am HOPING you are kidding.
Actually, the OP is unintentionally correct. At a stretch, the water vapour produced by aircraft engines is obviously a greenhouse gas, but more importantly, contrails are a visual testimony to the volume of commercial air traffic and a reminder of the carbon footprint associated with this.
@Pdr Well again, you could argue that C02 is a harmful gas in terms of the combustion of fossil fuels. It's hard to comprehend what the OP is actually trying to say. In respect of the chemtrail hoax, they are simply misidentified contrails composed of ice crystals - and in the case of persistent/spreading ones, almost entirely drawn from available atmospheric moisture in supersaturated conditions. One could make a case for the climate forcing effect of contrail coverage, but the extent of radiative forcing has yet to be fully established and the net effect cold be quite minimal due to the cooling effect of contrail cirrus during the day. Both are probably very slight.
I know what you mean I’m 69 and after breathing the wonderful chemicals I just feel good!!! I feel like I’m 20 all I can say keep it up All the world to you and yours bend oregon 😎😎😎👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻😇😇😇❤️❤️❤️💪😀😀😀
@@jamesbradley5144 yep, same in Netherlands skies in # form. These are no condence trails ( they dissapear right away) these are chemtrails, full of toxics an maybe, hope not, nucleair waste. These trails were in the dutch skies before supercells entering from the south, clinging on the chemtrails they dragged in for miles long and we had severe thunderstorms for 2 days with 4 light tornado's on the ground, caused huge dammage, mature trees swiped of their roots and/ or broke like matches, roofs dammaged, cars upside down. In @msterdam( 4 june) there was some wind (!) 300 mature trees went down and 5 people injured. In the Netherlands a few days after the chemtrails were made, the are weatherpaterns co-enginered and the goverments deny on this. After these storms, with milions of euro dammage, this morning ( july 4th) I've seen those trails back in the sky making #, this is no coincidence, these are man made poison trails. 😯
contrails stand for condensation trails. the air and exhaust coming from the engine is 600°C. when it comes into contact with cold air, it turns into water and steam. it's literally just water. you also make contrails when you breathe in cold weather.
@@dragxnnu You are on the right track, it is just a bit more complicated :-) What you are looking at (and it is AMAZING) is not moisture from the exhaust, but mostly moisture precipitating from over-saturated super-cooled air. The air has been "primed" and needed just some agitation to get the excessive moisture to freeze. The amount of the ice crystals produced this way can exceed the amount contained in the exhaust gasses 1,000 to 10,000 times. Part of the picture are also AERODYNAMIC contrails - very well described here: contrailscience.com/aerodynamic-and-rainbow-contrails/ The whole cloud behind the plane doesn't contain anything what wasn't there before (except of some NORMAL products of combustion from the engines). It is only condensation of the existing atmospheric water vapours caused by the water in the exhaust and the turbulence around the plane surface. The air was obviously oversaturated and hyper-cooled, waiting only for some excitation to produce this incredible spectacular. Doesn't happen every day :-).
1.“Con”= Condensation the result of hot air forced into cold air (temporary) 2.”Chem”=Chemicals sprayed into cold or warm air. Very long lasting effect. Two different things all together.
Just mesmerizing! Like some great wide-bodied sky beast plunging earthward. It's amazing how slight the 787 itself looks once it finally resolves ahead of its contrail at the end.
Great example of one being sprayed but not great stuff. If it was a con trail it wouldn't have just started mid flight as if a button was pushed. Can't switch contrails on and off.
If the approaching plane with the enormous, colored, thick and "perfectly normal contrail" is just a regular scheduled airliner, it must be possible to get information about it. Did LouB747 ever get a confirmation of what plane it was? Every airliner is tracked on radar, so this flight that more or less crossed the flight path of the aircraft that LouB747 was sitting in, shouldn't be a problem to identify, right?
@Jerry GARCIA i learn new conspiracy theories every few weeks, is this website dedicated to Contrails, & how airplanes spew out poisons into the atmosphere on purpose?
@Jerry GARCIA I know geoengineering exist, but I know its done for the betterment of the planet when done by the Gov., but not always the case when done by bad people that wants the world to end, like Arsonist. but people saying going around the country & watching Contrails as a living, is wasting their time. that thing you call Contrails is jet engine exhaust
@Jerry GARCIA you are entitled to what you want to believe, but Facts dont care about ones or vast opinion. You Did get one part right, where u say "screw up", & by definition "screwing up" means messing up on something not on purpose, which isn't evil
@Jerry GARCIA i forgot to Think, now that you told me to do it, i did it, & now i BELIEVE. I believe the GOV. IS poising us. WHY didnt you just tell me to Think earlier, we could have SAVED so much TIME. next time your in a DEBATE, just tell them to Think, & all fact will BE that what you KNOW
everytime I see the video I post a link back to this video and give you credit for it... folks ought to at the very least give credit where it is due...
What a great visualization of wake turbulence,just imagine a itty-bitty general aviation aircraft caught in those vortexes in the thick air near the ground.
Ya right??? The only thing "Con" about these trails is how the government is trying to Con us into believing these are actually just Condensation trails!
Technically it IS a trail of chemicals. It is condensed water. Water is a chemical. Thus, a contrail is made from a chemical, yes. Now I am off to drink a nice cold glass of that very same chemical. I might add some solidified pieces of that chemical to make it even colder!
Just freaking air pollution with cheap kerosine that’s the chemtrail time for lockdown and COVID so great blue sky clean air to breath ….ah people fly too much
@@eaanaoea I’ve been an airline pilot of over 30 years. I know more about aviation than most. All the chemtrail explanations make absolutely no sense at all. Everyone repeats the same false information like it’s fact. You can try and insult me all you like, but you’d be better off spending your time researching why it couldn’t possible be chentrails. But we both know you won’t do that. Rock on brother
Near 1000 mph would require that the other aircraft would have come almost exactly from the opposite direction. But here it looks rather like it is coming from the side in almost 90° angle ;)
@@loub747 its not air is not powered by wather as stime engines.cant bolive that people after so mach government shit takin sach lie as true and exast pipe is in the tail and from 1971 ist not alowed to let a small fart out .get geoingineering from Harward clear or better monsanto
@@loub747 what were the temps? outside and output? curious cause I've witnessed contrail dissapating instantly while another passed by immediately and didn't dissipate..so your going to tell me...?? i also have a video of another two planes side by side on a warm day where one of the Jets trail again dissipates while the other dis not! kindly explain why this is RARE? this particular footage...
@big pompano if you go to the very beginning of my videos you'll see 2 identical planes that aren't even following the flight path that are set for them. both are at a low and same altitude, both are releasing contrails yet 1 dissipates while the other does not..I stayed in this particular area in Europe for 3 months and watched them target the sun. i also have a foto of a plane that passed right next to us at 43,000 feet which was -30°C and the ice particles dissipated almost instantly..this particular plane and others that are from the same base are running tests. they can deny it all they want, at the end of the day the majority now know...it's that blatant obvious that they actually look like clown from a circus that are performing the same act as they had done for so many shows 😂 they mock us even ahaha the reason why? there are no chemicals..well none now as they did earlier. my guess is that they are changing the polarity of the atomised spray which causes it to spread slowly until it loses its charge or when it latches onto vapour/moisture that is it's opposite. it not new. they use this tech to spray paint on cars and vineyards etc..there is something in it but not dangerous or detectable at ground level..see if you can find soil or air tests...you won't, it's not hard to test either.. any questions just ask I'll try to help out
Ask yourself, “why does RUclips care about trying to convince me that there’s no such thing as chemtrails?” (with a separate box linking you to Encyclopedia Britannica on contrails.)
Because they have suffered heavy criticism for long harbouring and being a platform for deceptive agenda ridden conspiracy theory and opinion at the expense of evidence based fact. I believe that this flat earth nonsense was likely the final straw. The rational world tires of this epidemic of stupidity. I suggest that you read it.
John Yossarian Of all the videos that can be found on RUclips-based in fantasy, clickbait, and promotion-THIS topic is so ridiculous that they have to respond it? And, of course, you do know-being the disinformation troll that you are-that the CIA director John Brennan has already admitted to the ability to employ chemtrails-known as stratospheric aerosol injections-and the cost of such a program ($10 billion a year.) Now do you want to keep pretending or shall we get back to reality? Admission here: m.ruclips.net/video/WBG81dXgM0Q/видео.html
@@seanodion7989 "Of all the videos that can be found on RUclips-based in fantasy, clickbait, and promotion-THIS topic is so ridiculous that they have to respond it?" In a word - yes...given that it is based upon all three. "And, of course, you do know-being the disinformation troll that you are" How ironic. I am in full agreement with the contents of this video. What disinformation would that be? As the one posting your fallacious nonsense on this page the troll here would in fact be none other than you. "The CIA director John Brennan has already admitted to the ability to employ chemtrails-known as stratospheric aerosol injections-and the cost of such a program ($10 billion a year.)" Actually no - the chemtrails hoax originated in the late nineties largely through Coast to Coast AM and the late night shows of Art Bell. As a commercial radio station the manufacture of conspiracy theory (which they still do to order), not only boosted ratings, but in so doing, advertising revenue. Since the advent of the internet and the post truth era, conspiracy theory has burgeoned and is now lucrative big business. The perceived relationship with "geoengineering" is purely as a result of the efforts of the perpetrators of the chemtrails hoax to intentionally conflate the two in a desperate bid to afford credence and legitimacy to their ludicrous claims. The chemtrails hoax is predicated upon the misidentification of contrails. Geoengineering is a very broad term and can be divided into two main headings - GGR (Greenhouse Gas Removal) and SRM (Solar Radiation Management). GGR involves such strategies such as aforestation, carbon sequestering, ambient air capture, and biochar, whilst most funding and interest is channelled into ocean fertilisation. SRM exists very much in the real of paper based proposal and would involve methods such as marine cloud brightening, albedo enhancement and space reflectors. One of these, Stratospheric Aerosol injection has not even progressed beyond the status of isolated small scale trial. SAI exists on paper..that's it. The formidable challenges in respect of logistics, geo-politics, governance and the appreciable opposition both within and outside scientific circles mean that it is very unlikely that even in a last ditch attempt to address global warming, that it would ever be employed. There is not even an agreement upon the materials that would best be employed to simulate the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols - indeed, next year an experiment involving a balloon and mere kilos of calcium carbonate (that's right, chalk), will take place in the Arizona desert. Even if SAI were to become a reality, it is unlikely that it would be perceptible to the ground base observer to to altitude and its deployment in the form of a fine mist. It certainly wouldn't be resemble the long white plumes in the wake of commercial air traffic that gullible online scientifically illiterate dullards claim to be "chemtrails". The latter is precisely what this video is debunking. To your link then. Did you even watch this or were you simply taken in by the deceptively titled clickbait strapline? This is ex Director of the CIA appearing as a guest speaker for the Council on Foreign Relations. The theme is "Transitional Threats to Global Security". www.cfr.org/event/john-brennan-transnational-threats-global-security Brennan discussed future issues that may result in global instability. An SAI program for example, if ever implemented, could generate conflicts and security threats if misused. It is within the remit of the CIA to consider a range of initiatives and their associated potential future international implications, including technological and science oriented concepts. Brennan was discussing SRM in the future abstract sense from the analytical perspective of a PESTLE framework. He broached a range of research proposals and concepts that may however never be put into practice. He even talked about anti -ageing technologies. Please cite the precise passage in which John Brennan "admits" that geoengineering, (or chemtrails as the deceptive titles of these videos would have you believe), are currently in progress. Here is the full transcription of Brennan's speech to help you... www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2016-speeches-testimony/director-brennan-speaks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations.html What does research into Stratospheric Aerosol Injection have to do with the footage contained in this video and a ludicrous conspiracy theory predicated upon the misidentification of condensed atmospheric water vapour in the form of contrails? Why do you believe that SAI would resemble a large white plume in the wake of commercial air traffic at half the altitude? Why do you suppose that a Boeing 787 Dreamliner with a MTOW of 240 metric tonnes would be employed for the purposes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection? Now do you want to keep pretending or shall we get back to reality?
John Yossarian While I can’t speak to the veracity of this video, I can speak to the veracity of looking up at the sky. I can tell you about to the clear blue skies that get filled with a white mist, glossing-out the sun behind a white sheet of “something.” I can detail the streaks left by very high altitude planes-not commercial planes which fly at a much lower altitude-that create lines across the sky and expand slowly throughout the day until they create this sheet glossing-out. I can verify that I’ve seen breaks in these lines before continuing to trace the sky again. (Please, tell me how does one turn “condensation” off and on while continuing to apply thrust?) And to your point of “ludicrous conspiracy theory” you take alternate positions: on one hand, it’s a “promising technology” when John Brennan talks about it (as quoted by him in his speech) while, on the other hand, it’s a ludicrous conspiracy theory when I talk about it. This is reality and welcome to it: The government is not going to wait for your permission before it does what it wants to do. Look up and stop waiting for the newsletter.
@@seanodion7989 Thank you for your reply Jason. "While I can’t speak to the veracity of this video" I can...it's a Boeing 787-8 captured over Eastern Russia producing contrails. "I can speak to the veracity of looking up at the sky." So can I, having qualified in Applied Meteorology and Climatology over two decades ago. My specialist field was the science of Remote Sensing - so I can tell you how to measure it too. "I can tell you about to the clear blue skies that get filled with a white mist, glossing-out the sun behind a white sheet of “something.” You mean much like condensed atmospheric water vapour? How coincidental. "I can detail the streaks left by very high altitude planes-not commercial planes..." How precisely have you established this? "...which fly at a much lower altitude..." Again, how have you established this. Commercial air traffic will typically cruise between FL250 and FL400 - although on occasions higher. Business jets, up to FL550. "...that create lines across the sky and expand slowly throughout the day until they create this sheet glossing-out." You mean persistent contrails evolving into contrail cirrus. Not uncommon in the upper tropopause and lower stratosphere. In ambient air that is saturated in respect to ice, contrails not only linger because they are unable to sublimate back into their invisible gaseous state (water vapour), but may expand due to shear and the fact that most of the moisture is available in the atmosphere, becoming indistinguishable from regular cirrus. There is a large amount of current research into the extent of radiative forcing associated with cirrus aviaticus. journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0005.1 journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/1520-0469%282000%29057%3C0464%3AOTTOCI%3E2.0.CO%3B2 www.met.reading.ac.uk/~sgs02rpa/PAPERS/Haywood09JGR.pdf "I can verify that I’ve seen breaks in these lines before continuing to trace the sky again. (Please, tell me how does one turn “condensation” off and on while continuing to apply thrust?)" Certainly. The atmosphere is actually studied as a fluid. Being neither isotropic or homogeneous in regards to pressure and humidity, conditions can change within a matter of metres. Fly an aircraft through this at high speed it's the reason that you can experience turbulence and moreover means that a contrail may be sporadic and intermittently appear to turn off and on. It's also the reason that you witness scattered or broken/partial cloud cover. If you want further confirmation of this, look closer. You'll also observe that large sections of existing persistent contrails can fade and vanish disproportionately seemingly are random some minutes later after the contrail has been deposited. This is due to rising and subsiding parcels of drier or warmer air. A contrail is governed by temperature, pressure and humidity. The contrail factor is very complex and is calculated by applied mathematic in the form of binomial equations. journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0005.1 Since ambient air and these prevailing conditions can vary with altitude an aircraft flying at FL29 may not produce a contrail, whilst one at FL300 will - or vice versa. It its practically impossible to differentiate between such relative altitudes based upon observation from the ground. "And to your point of “ludicrous conspiracy theory” you take alternate positions: on one hand, it’s a “promising technology” when John Brennan talks about it (as quoted by him in his speech) while, on the other hand, it’s a ludicrous conspiracy theory when I talk about it." Because if you read my last reply again - no one is denying the existence of geoengineering or that research proposals are funded and small scale trials are imminently pending. In spite of the ridiculous and deceptive title of your RUclips video John Brennan did not "admit" that this was in progress, nor did he "admit" to your chemtrails - and I challenged you to directly quote either from the transcription provided. As I explained, chemtrails are an online hoax based upon the misidentification of contrails and in an attempt to vindicated their claims, perpetrators and believers in this conspiracy theory are increasingly intentionally conflating the two. In the unlikely event that SAI was ever deployed, you would know about it because it would be publicised, just as you know about the research because it has never been hidden. You would not however know about it because of a large white plume in the wake or a civil airliner, as in the footage contained in this video. SAI would take place at double the altitudes of the aircraft you are seeing in the form of a fine mist and very probably in equatorial regions to utilise the Brewer Dobson circulation patterns. Currently, one of the major problems that it confronts is the fact that there is no aircraft in existence that could convey the necessary payload to the designated altitudes. This would require a heavily modified fleet, or entirely new designs, which would be prohibitively expensive. It certainly wouldn't involve a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. "This is reality and welcome to it: The government is not going to wait for your permission before it does what it wants to do." Which "government"? Did you not listen to Brennan? One of the major concerns, caveats if you like, regarding SAI would be the issue of geo-politics and international governance of such a scheme. Again, what does any of this have to do with a contrail in either appearance, form or deployment? "Look up" I can assure that I do - particularly since I have alpine climbed since childhood. Science is your friend, online conspiracy theory which promotes and thrives off ignorance, fear and prejudice most certainly isn't. "stop waiting for the newsletter." May I recommend a meteorology textbook instead? Thanks again for your reply.
it's condensation. the engines exhaust is ususlly >600°C and the air around is ~-50°C. mixed eith the air pollution and high humidity on that day, contrails form behind and around the plane's engines. that's where the "con" in contrail comes from
contrails stand for condensation trails. the air and exhaust coming from the engine is 600°C. when it comes into contact with cold air, it turns into water and steam. it's literally just water. you also make contrails when you breathe in cold weather.
@A_Mercer Your vaccination relentlessly repeated mantra (what seems to be the only "argument" you have) is totally wasted on me. Due to an, otherwise quite innocuous, medical issue I am exempt from compulsory vaccination. Bummer, isn't it 🙂. Anyway, no time for idiots. Over and out.
contrails stand for condensation trails. the air and exhaust coming from the engine is 600°C. when it comes into contact with cold air, it turns into water and steam. it's literally just water. you also make contrails when you breathe in cold weather.
You stole my video and you're mad at me? I don't care what you believe in, that's just not right. Next time ask first. I'll remove the strike against you if you remove the video. Your choice
Thank you very much sir. I forgot the source in the description of the video, I will put it right away, in the description I will put the link to your video, thank you again for removing the warning. And forgive me words that I could use.
@@flamingmohmohawesome4953 I hope you realize you're doing what the CIA came up with in the sixties. CIA made up the "conspiracy-theorist" culprit to silence critics after JFK was killed and some people were suspecting their own government.
@@onemanarmyoma0155 the pot calling the kettle black. Your the one easily fooled by these dumb conspiracy theories that lack scientific evidence. Let alone evidence period.
@@rodneycaupp5962 Actually these are only "wingtip vortices", a natural pure aerodynamical effect, that are made visible y high humidity Here are some others : ruclips.net/video/dfY5ZQDzC5s/видео.html ruclips.net/video/BaRb46vv_bQ/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/jxrYOVV_4tA/видео.html
@LouB747 When the sun and the observer are at the good angle, diffraction on the icelets of the contrails can be seen ad gives this irised picture. Like a real raibow needs that the sun is behind the observer
@@nospamnc2075 oh give it up stupid. Lol
@@random2732 Chemtrails do not exist. Final
@@nospamnc2075 but yet we clearly see with the naked eye of them spraying cloud like substance in the sky which stays with upon hours on, hell sometimes even make it rain and now here we got fool like you talkin about a doesn't exist ? damn Patrick are you really living on your rock??😂😂pitiful
ruclips.net/video/rI2OGALLTT0/видео.html
its just Snoop doggs private plane
Jean Quad VanDamme yeah, why didn't I think of that! Nice
Jean Quad VanDamme lololol!
Jean Quad VanDamme XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD XD 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😭😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yep ole snoop and tommy Chong having a good puff or two
Jean Quad 😂 😂 you nailed that Comment..it reminds me of the Movie *SOUL PLANE* !
One of the most beautiful things I've seen on RUclips. Thank You, Sir!
It’s my pleasure. I have some other similar videos in a Flying playlist. Lou B
That is probably one of the most incredible and impressive things I've ever seen! What I find fascinating are the rolling vortices being generated in the plane's wake. In many ways it is almost angelic, but in other ways it is like the Dreamliner is splitting it's own part of the sky in half. It's beautiful but yet haunting at the same time. What a fantastic capture! By the way, your interview with Kevin and Rudy on AVL was fantastic! It would be wonderful to hear you talk more about your experiences and profession in the very near future! Thank You!
That's an actual chemtrail. The chemical is Dihydrogen Monoxide.
Nice!
@@loub747 nice what? gate keeper
@@moussesr.9855
Seems that the joke in the OP is as over your head as contrails.
If you think that this is water vapor condensation then you are ill-informed.
@@kevinhay356very much so
Looks like the damn Reaver ship in Serenity.
Haha fuck yah it absolutely does.
You can almost hear the screams
ruclips.net/video/Gy-KID71kzQ/видео.html
@@jekku4688 You mean the screams of outrage when they cancelled the only good Sci-Fi to come out in decades?
Bless you sir.
What is amazing is the size of the wake vortex from the 787
flt path yeah, the sun behind it also helps it look more dense as it creates its own shadow.
Yeah, THAT'S what is amazing lol
Never in my life I ever thought jet contrails could be so scary.
Kinda cool though, huh.
@@loub747 undoubtedly.
Do you find it scary ? So strange.
Chem-trails.
@@nospamnc2075 I don't think it's strange. The sheer size of it can be frightening to some. I personally think it looks awesome, but I can understand the person above.
Never before have I seen a contrail so thick, heavy, and dense!
Yeah, it was a good one.
*chemtrail
@@MrAce2000 yes chemtrail, it contains a chemical named Oxidane, it can kill you if you breathe in it's liquid form.
@@eljaibas16 Yep
@@MrAce2000
Geo-Engineering
That "con" trail just started up a few hundred yards before you started filming...amazing. However, makes sense if a sprayer system was turned on and boy oh boy...those are some persistent "con" trails eh?
Try to reverse your logic: LouB747 started filming a few seconds after he spotted the contrail forming. Does it make sense to you?
Contrail tends to be large and persistent in an air oversaturated with supercooled water vapours. This is typical for early mornings before the sun messes it all up. Does it make sense to you?
@@curiouscat8457 thats just it... contrails arent persistent as the temps normalize...but it persisted and began dispersing...its not difficult to understand this with observation.
@@Faxxer248 May I suggest you start with simple stuff, like putting together a coherent sentence, before venturing into something like atmospheric science?
@@JohnVJay Don't confuse them with facts ;-).
Exactly... geoengineering at its finest. Or sickest!
Morpheus: "You think that's air your breathing now"
@brian bowes
Yea, that water vapor is a real killer.
Danger rely
@@Booboobear-eo4es or is it all lies?? Lol jk
Worked in aviation all my adult life and always watched the skies. Those are not normal convection trails. Sure as hell not water vapor LOL.
@@Booboobear-eo4es I am sure you have heard of chemtrails
Wish I had a rear view mirror to see it. Pretty cool, thanks for sharing that!!
Thanks. It's my pleasure!
Wow, that looks like some kind of weird snake 😁 Captain Lou, your visit with AVL's Kevin and Rudy today was fantastic. You are so interesting and fun. I hope you will do that again sometime in the future. Thank you 👍
Thanks so much. That was fun on AVL. I’ll definitely go back and do it again.
ruclips.net/video/epa6WxEw1Xk/видео.html
YEAH ! Best video 2017 dude !
Thanks so much. Really appreciate the support!
je vois que des commentaire de mes chaine préfère et "grosse chaine" sur des vidéos pas connus
Ou soit vous avez pas de like c'est bizzare
Stéphane Couchoud hi
ruclips.net/video/rI2OGALLTT0/видео.html
21
Came for the video, stayed for the comments. Thank you, fellow internet-ers, i've not had this much fun in a long time.
I made myself a coffee and enjoyed the show.
Morten Rollsen It's down right fuckin scary that people can be THAT stupid. Obviously referring to chemtrails and flat Urrfffers(Earth in proper English). Also they are procreating!
+David Horgan It's not stupid to believe that the government is spraying us with chemicals.......in the 50's they literally sprayed kids with DDT because government-sponsored scientists deemed it so "safe and effective," when they downright knew it was dangerous. It's downright fuckin scary that today's generations are stupid enough to think their government would NEVER do something like that, when they have on multiple occasions. At best it's called willful negligence. The question of HOW they are doing it is where your cited chemtrails "stupidity" comes from; but the science behind detecting the particles in question is a thing.
+Paid Gov't Debunker Why is it stupid to believe the government is doing something now which they have done in the past (and with fluoride--continue to do now)? It's pure dogma that you would go so far to idolize government. All the evidence points to them being corrupt. Many whistleblowers have come forth and many more are afraid to. Jack-asses like you argue from what you think is an "intellectual high-ground." You think you are smart, you can debunk crazy conspiracy theories that couldn't possibly be true. I used to think like you back when I was a dumb ass, and then I started investigating these matters and saw conclusive evidence for myself. I'm not saying I have a certainty the chemtrails is real, but I think it is likely that it is. If you wanted to disprove it you could go out and do so. If you were in any position to "debunk" chemtrails you could go out and invalidate the sample testing that has taken place on Mount Shasta and other areas. Science is about repeatability, and if you aren't willing to repeat the tests then you can't claim to have "debunked" them.
Your position is clearly a position of arrogance and not one of empirical evidence. I think that was already obvious to anyone with half a brain.
+Paid Gov't Debunker
"WHAT?!?!?"
Yes? You don't need to bold your sentences, I can read them just fine.
"Not a single credible "whistleblower" has come forth about "chemtrails"."
None of them credible? And how did you determine that? Did you did into their past? Did you find evidence they are liars? Were you confident enough to publish an exposé?
"Well, I DO have the truth on my side, so the jackass here seems to be you."
.....so you're a truther?
"Did "conclusive evidence" come from goofy, kook websites? Please share your most compelling sources of "evidence" with me, and I'll prove that you are a gullible fool."
I wasn't referring to chemtrails there buddy. I've done my own research. You've buried your head in the sand, evidently.
"OMG! Are you kidding?"
'OMG! I have to actually use science to debunk something?'
"There isn't a single credible test of any sort supporting the chemtrail fantasy... other than on fringy kook websites."
How can you know they aren't credible if you haven't tested them to make sure? That's how science works dumb ass.
"Evidently you still are a dumb ass"
And yet you're claiming you've debunked something when you really haven't. Also, that response was too predictable to be a valid insult.
And before I go.....here's your own mainstream media demonstrating government malicious intent, spraying people with toxic pollutants from planes: ruclips.net/video/tBzvdagmfOA/видео.html
Here's a few "whistleblowers" talking about more government malfeasance:
ruclips.net/video/jw471A3tjPk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/gg2M7nphmFw/видео.html
Here's old US Government propaganda for mass poisoning the populace with fluoride:
ruclips.net/video/79fBcKcKLPw/видео.html
What Fluoride Action Network has to say about it: fluoridealert.org/issues/health/brain/
Another kooky website? Or is it just kooky because you call it that?
This is why we're suspicious of yet more government malfeasance as there is no reason to believe they are magically less corrupt now than they were in the 50's.
I'm sorry you think you're infallible, but if you actually were, you wouldn't be afraid to go out and truly debunk these claims. It doesn't matter how clever or how prejudiced you are, your comments alone are not sufficient to debunk this hypothesis. If you can't take a hypothesis seriously for long enough to empirically test it, you are not fit to be making unsubstantiated claims that it is a false theory. And just because their haven't been many tests yet, only shows that there is not enough information.
It would seem that no matter what evidence is presented or how much, you will never abandon your faith. Regardless, I think most people will be smart enough to come around and notice when they're being lied to and what science really says about the matter.
Wow such amazing all-natural contrails ;)
Yeeeeah. Be happy!
ruclips.net/video/du3Heh3Iu2s/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/oHrElX5iMPU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/wJBBlntDtEU/видео.html
What do you mean "all-natural"?
@@geo3106 He means all natural because the trail is what "naturally" occurs to moist air when the aircraft pass through them, not exactly the most natural example of condensation but eh
@@sharko4093 🤣😅😆wake the fak up idiot
That was at the time when smoking was still allowed on the plane!
ruclips.net/video/Hd2jA0lT8N0/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/rI2OGALLTT0/видео.html
never thought I'd ever see a airliner rolling coal...
You've never seen an old 707 at full throttle have you?
I wonder what it's doing to our children has anyone notice how hyper active kids r today. And thete always screaming words.
ruclips.net/video/du3Heh3Iu2s/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/oHrElX5iMPU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/wJBBlntDtEU/видео.html
@@nickhale117 😂🤣😂🤣😂
I assume you are just kidding. But Poe's Law is definitely in effect and there was a fad where people were eating tide pods, so I just can't assume a minimum level if idiocy.
So I guess, really, I am HOPING you are kidding.
THIS is the greenhouse effect: every morning hundreads of planes spreading the same every direction. In the afternoon you don't see the sun anywhere.
And you wouldn't believe how bad it is at night! :-)
Actually, the OP is unintentionally correct. At a stretch, the water vapour produced by aircraft engines is obviously a greenhouse gas, but more importantly, contrails are a visual testimony to the volume of commercial air traffic and a reminder of the carbon footprint associated with this.
@Pdr Well again, you could argue that C02 is a harmful gas in terms of the combustion of fossil fuels. It's hard to comprehend what the OP is actually trying to say.
In respect of the chemtrail hoax, they are simply misidentified contrails composed of ice crystals - and in the case of persistent/spreading ones, almost entirely drawn from available atmospheric moisture in supersaturated conditions. One could make a case for the climate forcing effect of contrail coverage, but the extent of radiative forcing has yet to be fully established and the net effect cold be quite minimal due to the cooling effect of contrail cirrus during the day. Both are probably very slight.
This is sprayed with vitamins, so that people are healthy, strong and not sick! 😄 😄 😄
😄👍 In a perfect world... Awesome!
🥝🍅🍇✈️🍏🍓🍋
Smart comment.
I know what you mean I’m 69 and after breathing the wonderful chemicals I just feel good!!! I feel like I’m 20 all I can say keep it up All the world to you and yours bend oregon 😎😎😎👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻😇😇😇❤️❤️❤️💪😀😀😀
@@jamesbradley5144 yep, same in Netherlands skies in # form. These are no condence trails ( they dissapear right away) these are chemtrails, full of toxics an maybe, hope not, nucleair waste. These trails were in the dutch skies before supercells entering from the south, clinging on the chemtrails they dragged in for miles long and we had severe thunderstorms for 2 days with 4 light tornado's on the ground, caused huge dammage, mature trees swiped of their roots and/ or broke like matches, roofs dammaged, cars upside down. In @msterdam( 4 june) there was some wind (!) 300 mature trees went down and 5 people injured. In the Netherlands a few days after the chemtrails were made, the are weatherpaterns co-enginered and the goverments deny on this.
After these storms, with milions of euro dammage, this morning ( july 4th) I've seen those trails back in the sky making #, this is no coincidence, these are man made poison trails. 😯
the level of stupidity here is amazing !
Best video on this channel!!!!! For not having a snake in it.
Thanks. So crazy to see in person.
Pilot to passengers: “Please note that the no smoking light has been turned on!”
Exactly.
Not funny
This is Chemtrails to the max. Thanks for sharing.
It's my pleasure to share, although I disagree with what it is.
+michael flegel
Any idea how much this trail weighs? No of course you haven't.
contrails stand for condensation trails. the air and exhaust coming from the engine is 600°C. when it comes into contact with cold air, it turns into water and steam. it's literally just water. you also make contrails when you breathe in cold weather.
@@dragxnnu You are on the right track, it is just a bit more complicated :-)
What you are looking at (and it is AMAZING) is not moisture from the exhaust, but mostly moisture precipitating from over-saturated super-cooled air. The air has been "primed" and needed just some agitation to get the excessive moisture to freeze. The amount of the ice crystals produced this way can exceed the amount contained in the exhaust gasses 1,000 to 10,000 times. Part of the picture are also AERODYNAMIC contrails - very well described here:
contrailscience.com/aerodynamic-and-rainbow-contrails/
The whole cloud behind the plane doesn't contain anything what wasn't there before (except of some NORMAL products of combustion from the engines). It is only condensation of the existing atmospheric water vapours caused by the water in the exhaust and the turbulence around the plane surface. The air was obviously oversaturated and hyper-cooled, waiting only for some excitation to produce this incredible spectacular. Doesn't happen every day :-).
@@curiouscat8457 plus the water from the highly hydroscopic kerosene. (like in Diesel exhaust)
1.“Con”= Condensation the result of hot air forced into cold air (temporary) 2.”Chem”=Chemicals sprayed into cold or warm air. Very long lasting effect. Two different things all together.
Yup, this is a contrail. Some clouds last all day long
@@loub747 Condensation trails only last for seconds, it's the chemtrails that last hours.
@@rodneystanger1651 Rubbish. Contrails can spread and hang around for hours. Chemtrails are not real.
@@paulshepherd8295 Contrails are just water vaper, you tool. They don't last more than seconds. Don't be stupid.
@@rodneystanger1651
Could you explain why, detailing the physical laws that determine this? Thanks.
That's one of the more amazing things I've seen in this life.
Yeah, it was really nice in person. Video is damn close to the experience though.
When I was a kid I used to think contrails are just smoke from plane exhaust pipe like cars/bikes 😂 and used to wonder why only few planes have them.
That had to have been within the last 25 years.
Lol. It’s amazing what we thought as kids.
@Jerry GARCIA www.tinfoilhatanonymous.com
Me too. 🙋♂️
Awesome footage!
Thanks so much. Appreciate the nice comment
Растаманы с Ямайки летят!
That's awesome! Personally, I love watching jets make contrails, despite many people saying I'm "sick in the head".
Yeah, it’s a bit mesmerizing. I’ve seen quite a few as a 747 pilot of 30 years. They never get old! Lou B
That's what it looks like when I fly my Cessna 152. I think it's leaking oil.
Talk with your mechanic.
It s need to switch in cab filter. Prevent farting.
Armer Mark.
Du weißt wirklich gar nichts.
LiebeGrüße.
I just had to say lol... I cracked a laugh.
Hmmm, leaking oil on the headers. Oy
@ATCkeepsUsafe Why the abuse? His comment makes much more sense than any by the chemtards!
Reminds me of Flash Gordon. 'Gordon's ALIVE!'
Thank you for flying Morgellons Airlines🤪
Exactly.
FLY AIR AMERICA!!!
well done. we live in a DOUBLE FACED world FULL OF DOUBLE FACED CUNTS
@@loub747 Thank you, and stay safe, my friend.
Fucking idiot . Dont speak if you have no proof
Wow, look how much the wings are flexing. Cool video.
Thanks.
Key word here is "Russia". That's just one of the motherland's advanced diesel-powered aircraft.
lol yep and those are "RARE" contrails...read between the lines 🤫
It is a 787. Manufactured by Boeing. They all use jet fuel. Diesel is not high enough octane to run their engines.
Pressure drops -> temperature drops -> steam condensates
Exactly! That's all it is. But try explaining that to these "global warming" lunatics.
Just mesmerizing! Like some great wide-bodied sky beast plunging earthward. It's amazing how slight the 787 itself looks once it finally resolves ahead of its contrail at the end.
Great description! Nailed it.
So suddenly, somewhere midair these strange 'contrails' appear ? Question is ; what are they spraying ?
They aren’t spraying anything.
Now that is a great chem trail
you can bred then it must be good for you not for me
Haarp?
baka
Great example of one being sprayed but not great stuff. If it was a con trail it wouldn't have just started mid flight as if a button was pushed. Can't switch contrails on and off.
Actually, these are wingtip vortices, in humid air that creates condensation.
Amazing capture ! How did you spot that ? On which flight was it ?
Thanks. There were quite a few planes on this airway due to a volcano eruption nearby. I can't remember what airline that 787 was.
The question should probably have been "how could you possibly miss that?" :-) Amazing though!
Defertilization spraying targeted at flat Earthers.
Lol, if only it were that easy.
covid19
@Shane Cormier
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) :-D
TCAS System: If you can film this, you're too close!
Yeah, 1000 feet feels close.
@@loub747 At this altitude, more 1500 (RVSM) or 2000 feet, 1000 is not allowed even in Russia
@@hubertdurlewanger6582 RVSM 1000’ vertical separation. Look it up.
probably just a ton of cold humid air condensing around the exhaust particles.
Yeah, that would be correct. So many will try and tell you otherwise though.
YOU WISH FOOL = THIS IS A CHEMICAL TRAIL = IT CLOUDS THE SKYS AND FALLS TO THE EARTH = READ UP THERE POINDEXTER
@@tracym1208 Quit smoking the green stuff growing on the leftovers in the back of your fridge.
Here in Russia, even the contrails are severe
@your momma youtube 🤣🤣🤣
If the approaching plane with the enormous, colored, thick and "perfectly normal contrail" is just a regular scheduled airliner, it must be possible to get information about it. Did LouB747 ever get a confirmation of what plane it was? Every airliner is tracked on radar, so this flight that more or less crossed the flight path of the aircraft that LouB747 was sitting in, shouldn't be a problem to identify, right?
It's a passenger 787. Not sure if you can get flight records from that far back. Saw many others like this that morning.....
It is explained in the video that this plane is a "787 dreamliner". But it would not so easy to find out planes weeks or months ago !!!
**Dies of aluminum poisoning.**
Or not
this was a great day for science
@Jerry GARCIA i learn new conspiracy theories every few weeks, is this website dedicated to Contrails, & how airplanes spew out poisons into the atmosphere on purpose?
@@OmarTheAtheistAziz people still tell those fairytales?
@Jerry GARCIA I know geoengineering exist, but I know its done for the betterment of the planet when done by the Gov., but not always the case when done by bad people that wants the world to end, like Arsonist. but people saying going around the country & watching Contrails as a living, is wasting their time. that thing you call Contrails is jet engine exhaust
@Jerry GARCIA you are entitled to what you want to believe, but Facts dont care about ones or vast opinion. You Did get one part right, where u say "screw up", & by definition "screwing up" means messing up on something not on purpose, which isn't evil
@Jerry GARCIA i forgot to Think, now that you told me to do it, i did it, & now i BELIEVE. I believe the GOV. IS poising us. WHY didnt you just tell me to Think earlier, we could have SAVED so much TIME. next time your in a DEBATE, just tell them to Think, & all fact will BE that what you KNOW
everytime I see the video I post a link back to this video and give you credit for it...
folks ought to at the very least give credit where it is due...
Thanks so much for that. I can't believe how many people just take without asking. I guess that's the world we live in nowadays. Crazy. Thanks again!
yep, I figure this is a good way to lead by example... just give credit where it is due....such a simple thing
Credit goes to Bill Gates....for dimming the sun, or should I say climate engineering, depopulation and world domination.
What a great visualization of wake turbulence,just imagine a itty-bitty general aviation aircraft caught in those vortexes in the thick air near the ground.
ruclips.net/video/wJBBlntDtEU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/oHrElX5iMPU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/du3Heh3Iu2s/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/oHrElX5iMPU/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/wJBBlntDtEU/видео.html
Wow that´s a massive chemtrail XD
Good times
Ya right??? The only thing "Con" about these trails is how the government is trying to Con us into believing these are actually just Condensation trails!
@@paulmurphy5244 lame
@@paulmurphy5244Easy to spot the guy who's peak moment of education was grade 8.
Technically it IS a trail of chemicals. It is condensed water. Water is a chemical. Thus, a contrail is made from a chemical, yes. Now I am off to drink a nice cold glass of that very same chemical. I might add some solidified pieces of that chemical to make it even colder!
Breathe deep, it's almost over.
lol
Damn he forgot to turn off the sprinklers 😂😅😅
There’s that! Lou B
Awesome visualization of wake vortex. Also, it's kind of sad how many weather conspiracies there are.
Yeah, so many chemtrailers out there
Just freaking air pollution with cheap kerosine that’s the chemtrail time for lockdown and COVID so great blue sky clean air to breath ….ah people fly too much
@@eaanaoea I’ve been an airline pilot of over 30 years. I know more about aviation than most. All the chemtrail explanations make absolutely no sense at all. Everyone repeats the same false information like it’s fact. You can try and insult me all you like, but you’d be better off spending your time researching why it couldn’t possible be chentrails. But we both know you won’t do that. Rock on brother
Chemtrails exist but only on crop dusters.
Or South Vietnam when I was there in the 60's.
*_That's actually a "weather balloon"..._*
*_...trailing "swamp gas"..._*
Hjllariuos, bro!
The mindblowing thing about that clip is the closing speed of both planes would be near 1000 mph, assuming both were crusing at around 500mph.
Near 1000 mph would require that the other aircraft would have come almost exactly from the opposite direction. But here it looks rather like it is coming from the side in almost 90° angle ;)
Actually it’s head on
Yeah, we cruise around Mach .84. Approximately 485 kts or 550mph. So 1100mph closure rate.
@@loub747 Really? It looked like if it came from the left side. Thank you for the clarification.
This is a tough one for the chem trail components. Apparently “they” have also invented a way to have an infinite supply of chemicals.
I mean those people also think that jet engines run on compressed air while also producing more compressed air than they supposedly consume so...
Yassassin:
Those are NO contrails!
Those are chemicals !
Oh but they’re not….
No andras, that is NOT a 'chemtrail', lol.
@@loub747 I have to disagree here. Dihydrogen monoxide is a chemical as well as carbon dioxide ;)
That isnt a chemtrail, someone just used the toilet
Big time!
WOW ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE VIDEO !!!!!!!!
THANKS!
Amazing. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks. It’s my pleasure.
Their worm never dies. They are tormented forever and forever in the abyss.
Are you talking about the vrill? Lol
This is the kind of thing that could be mistaken for an UFO.
Yeah, I hear that.
Amazing to see Frozone at it again 🌊🏄♂️
Warm air from the engine colliding with the cold altitude. No “chemtrails”
Yeah, it's that simple. It's amazing what a lot of people think......
@@loub747 its not air is not powered by wather as stime engines.cant bolive that people after so mach government shit takin sach lie as true
and exast pipe is in the tail and from 1971 ist not alowed to let a small fart out .get geoingineering from Harward clear or better monsanto
@@loub747 what were the temps? outside and output? curious cause I've witnessed contrail dissapating instantly while another passed by immediately and didn't dissipate..so your going to tell me...?? i also have a video of another two planes side by side on a warm day where one of the Jets trail again dissipates while the other dis not! kindly explain why this is RARE? this particular footage...
@big pompano if you go to the very beginning of my videos you'll see 2 identical planes that aren't even following the flight path that are set for them. both are at a low and same altitude, both are releasing contrails yet 1 dissipates while the other does not..I stayed in this particular area in Europe for 3 months and watched them target the sun. i also have a foto of a plane that passed right next to us at 43,000 feet which was -30°C and the ice particles dissipated almost instantly..this particular plane and others that are from the same base are running tests. they can deny it all they want, at the end of the day the majority now know...it's that blatant obvious that they actually look like clown from a circus that are performing the same act as they had done for so many shows 😂 they mock us even ahaha the reason why? there are no chemicals..well none now as they did earlier. my guess is that they are changing the polarity of the atomised spray which causes it to spread slowly until it loses its charge or when it latches onto vapour/moisture that is it's opposite. it not new. they use this tech to spray paint on cars and vineyards etc..there is something in it but not dangerous or detectable at ground level..see if you can find soil or air tests...you won't, it's not hard to test either..
any questions just ask I'll try to help out
@@sheep.herder just for prospective, if its 70°F on the ground, it'll be -30°F at the altitude they're cruising at.
Ask yourself, “why does RUclips care about trying to convince me that there’s no such thing as chemtrails?” (with a separate box linking you to Encyclopedia Britannica on contrails.)
Because they have suffered heavy criticism for long harbouring and being a platform for deceptive agenda ridden conspiracy theory and opinion at the expense of evidence based fact. I believe that this flat earth nonsense was likely the final straw. The rational world tires of this epidemic of stupidity.
I suggest that you read it.
John Yossarian Of all the videos that can be found on RUclips-based in fantasy, clickbait, and promotion-THIS topic is so ridiculous that they have to respond it? And, of course, you do know-being the disinformation troll that you are-that the CIA director John Brennan has already admitted to the ability to employ chemtrails-known as stratospheric aerosol injections-and the cost of such a program ($10 billion a year.) Now do you want to keep pretending or shall we get back to reality? Admission here: m.ruclips.net/video/WBG81dXgM0Q/видео.html
@@seanodion7989
"Of all the videos that can be found on RUclips-based in fantasy, clickbait, and promotion-THIS topic is so ridiculous that they have to respond it?"
In a word - yes...given that it is based upon all three.
"And, of course, you do know-being the disinformation troll that you are"
How ironic. I am in full agreement with the contents of this video. What disinformation would that be? As the one posting your fallacious nonsense on this page the troll here would in fact be none other than you.
"The CIA director John Brennan has already admitted to the ability to employ chemtrails-known as stratospheric aerosol injections-and the cost of such a program ($10 billion a year.)"
Actually no - the chemtrails hoax originated in the late nineties largely through Coast to Coast AM and the late night shows of Art Bell. As a commercial radio station the manufacture of conspiracy theory (which they still do to order), not only boosted ratings, but in so doing, advertising revenue. Since the advent of the internet and the post truth era, conspiracy theory has burgeoned and is now lucrative big business. The perceived relationship with "geoengineering" is purely as a result of the efforts of the perpetrators of the chemtrails hoax to intentionally conflate the two in a desperate bid to afford credence and legitimacy to their ludicrous claims.
The chemtrails hoax is predicated upon the misidentification of contrails. Geoengineering is a very broad term and can be divided into two main headings - GGR (Greenhouse Gas Removal) and SRM (Solar Radiation Management). GGR involves such strategies such as aforestation, carbon sequestering, ambient air capture, and biochar, whilst most funding and interest is channelled into ocean fertilisation. SRM exists very much in the real of paper based proposal and would involve methods such as marine cloud brightening, albedo enhancement and space reflectors. One of these, Stratospheric Aerosol injection has not even progressed beyond the status of isolated small scale trial.
SAI exists on paper..that's it. The formidable challenges in respect of logistics, geo-politics, governance and the appreciable opposition both within and outside scientific circles mean that it is very unlikely that even in a last ditch attempt to address global warming, that it would ever be employed. There is not even an agreement upon the materials that would best be employed to simulate the cooling effect of volcanic aerosols - indeed, next year an experiment involving a balloon and mere kilos of calcium carbonate (that's right, chalk), will take place in the Arizona desert.
Even if SAI were to become a reality, it is unlikely that it would be perceptible to the ground base observer to to altitude and its deployment in the form of a fine mist. It certainly wouldn't be resemble the long white plumes in the wake of commercial air traffic that gullible online scientifically illiterate dullards claim to be "chemtrails". The latter is precisely what this video is debunking.
To your link then. Did you even watch this or were you simply taken in by the deceptively titled clickbait strapline? This is ex Director of the CIA appearing as a guest speaker for the Council on Foreign Relations. The theme is "Transitional Threats to Global Security".
www.cfr.org/event/john-brennan-transnational-threats-global-security
Brennan discussed future issues that may result in global instability. An SAI program for example, if ever implemented, could generate conflicts and security threats if misused. It is within the remit of the CIA to consider a range of initiatives and their associated potential future international implications, including technological and science oriented concepts. Brennan was discussing SRM in the future abstract sense from the analytical perspective of a PESTLE framework. He broached a range of research proposals and concepts that may however never be put into practice. He even talked about anti -ageing technologies.
Please cite the precise passage in which John Brennan "admits" that geoengineering, (or chemtrails as the deceptive titles of these videos would have you believe), are currently in progress. Here is the full transcription of Brennan's speech to help you...
www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2016-speeches-testimony/director-brennan-speaks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations.html
What does research into Stratospheric Aerosol Injection have to do with the footage contained in this video and a ludicrous conspiracy theory predicated upon the misidentification of condensed atmospheric water vapour in the form of contrails? Why do you believe that SAI would resemble a large white plume in the wake of commercial air traffic at half the altitude? Why do you suppose that a Boeing 787 Dreamliner with a MTOW of 240 metric tonnes would be employed for the purposes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection?
Now do you want to keep pretending or shall we get back to reality?
John Yossarian While I can’t speak to the veracity of this video, I can speak to the veracity of looking up at the sky. I can tell you about to the clear blue skies that get filled with a white mist, glossing-out the sun behind a white sheet of “something.” I can detail the streaks left by very high altitude planes-not commercial planes which fly at a much lower altitude-that create lines across the sky and expand slowly throughout the day until they create this sheet glossing-out. I can verify that I’ve seen breaks in these lines before continuing to trace the sky again. (Please, tell me how does one turn “condensation” off and on while continuing to apply thrust?) And to your point of “ludicrous conspiracy theory” you take alternate positions: on one hand, it’s a “promising technology” when John Brennan talks about it (as quoted by him in his speech) while, on the other hand, it’s a ludicrous conspiracy theory when I talk about it. This is reality and welcome to it: The government is not going to wait for your permission before it does what it wants to do. Look up and stop waiting for the newsletter.
@@seanodion7989
Thank you for your reply Jason.
"While I can’t speak to the veracity of this video"
I can...it's a Boeing 787-8 captured over Eastern Russia producing contrails.
"I can speak to the veracity of looking up at the sky."
So can I, having qualified in Applied Meteorology and Climatology over two decades ago. My specialist field was the science of Remote Sensing - so I can tell you how to measure it too.
"I can tell you about to the clear blue skies that get filled with a white mist, glossing-out the sun behind a white sheet of “something.”
You mean much like condensed atmospheric water vapour? How coincidental.
"I can detail the streaks left by very high altitude planes-not commercial planes..."
How precisely have you established this?
"...which fly at a much lower altitude..."
Again, how have you established this. Commercial air traffic will typically cruise between FL250 and FL400 - although on occasions higher. Business jets, up to FL550.
"...that create lines across the sky and expand slowly throughout the day until they create this sheet glossing-out."
You mean persistent contrails evolving into contrail cirrus. Not uncommon in the upper tropopause and lower stratosphere. In ambient air that is saturated in respect to ice, contrails not only linger because they are unable to sublimate back into their invisible gaseous state (water vapour), but may expand due to shear and the fact that most of the moisture is available in the atmosphere, becoming indistinguishable from regular cirrus. There is a large amount of current research into the extent of radiative forcing associated with cirrus aviaticus.
journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0005.1
journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/1520-0469%282000%29057%3C0464%3AOTTOCI%3E2.0.CO%3B2
www.met.reading.ac.uk/~sgs02rpa/PAPERS/Haywood09JGR.pdf
"I can verify that I’ve seen breaks in these lines before continuing to trace the sky again. (Please, tell me how does one turn “condensation” off and on while continuing to apply thrust?)"
Certainly. The atmosphere is actually studied as a fluid. Being neither isotropic or homogeneous in regards to pressure and humidity, conditions can change within a matter of metres. Fly an aircraft through this at high speed it's the reason that you can experience turbulence and moreover means that a contrail may be sporadic and intermittently appear to turn off and on. It's also the reason that you witness scattered or broken/partial cloud cover. If you want further confirmation of this, look closer. You'll also observe that large sections of existing persistent contrails can fade and vanish disproportionately seemingly are random some minutes later after the contrail has been deposited. This is due to rising and subsiding parcels of drier or warmer air.
A contrail is governed by temperature, pressure and humidity. The contrail factor is very complex and is calculated by applied mathematic in the form of binomial equations.
journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0005.1
Since ambient air and these prevailing conditions can vary with altitude an aircraft flying at FL29 may not produce a contrail, whilst one at FL300 will - or vice versa. It its practically impossible to differentiate between such relative altitudes based upon observation from the ground.
"And to your point of “ludicrous conspiracy theory” you take alternate positions: on one hand, it’s a “promising technology” when John Brennan talks about it (as quoted by him in his speech) while, on the other hand, it’s a ludicrous conspiracy theory when I talk about it."
Because if you read my last reply again - no one is denying the existence of geoengineering or that research proposals are funded and small scale trials are imminently pending. In spite of the ridiculous and deceptive title of your RUclips video John Brennan did not "admit" that this was in progress, nor did he "admit" to your chemtrails - and I challenged you to directly quote either from the transcription provided. As I explained, chemtrails are an online hoax based upon the misidentification of contrails and in an attempt to vindicated their claims, perpetrators and believers in this conspiracy theory are increasingly intentionally conflating the two. In the unlikely event that SAI was ever deployed, you would know about it because it would be publicised, just as you know about the research because it has never been hidden. You would not however know about it because of a large white plume in the wake or a civil airliner, as in the footage contained in this video. SAI would take place at double the altitudes of the aircraft you are seeing in the form of a fine mist and very probably in equatorial regions to utilise the Brewer Dobson circulation patterns. Currently, one of the major problems that it confronts is the fact that there is no aircraft in existence that could convey the necessary payload to the designated altitudes. This would require a heavily modified fleet, or entirely new designs, which would be prohibitively expensive. It certainly wouldn't involve a Boeing 787 Dreamliner.
"This is reality and welcome to it: The government is not going to wait for your permission before it does what it wants to do."
Which "government"? Did you not listen to Brennan? One of the major concerns, caveats if you like, regarding SAI would be the issue of geo-politics and international governance of such a scheme. Again, what does any of this have to do with a contrail in either appearance, form or deployment?
"Look up"
I can assure that I do - particularly since I have alpine climbed since childhood. Science is your friend, online conspiracy theory which promotes and thrives off ignorance, fear and prejudice most certainly isn't.
"stop waiting for the newsletter."
May I recommend a meteorology textbook instead?
Thanks again for your reply.
Those aren't contrails… that morning's meal service was breakfast burritos.
Lol
Chemtrails 💨💨💨💨💨💨🛩
That thing has a set of bag piston rings..must have a Chrysler engine
Brilliant.. would love to see that on the big screen as a sequence in some Bond type thriller.
Yeah, that would look cool
Hehe, in recommended.
That is how clouds are made.
Never in my life I found chemtrails so scary but absolutely beautiful.
Contrail. There's no such thing as a 'chemtrail'.
@@siouxperb5570 contrails that get turned on and off. Sure.
@@CaliSteve169
So you don't understand that a contrail can be intermittent then?
There is a reason why it’s called the Screamliner
Jerry GARCIA you are one of ‘them’ aren’t you?
A spackwit.
@Jerry GARCIA that sounds a bit homoerotic, you filthy nonce.
@Jerry GARCIA who?
The city of Dallas Tx spraying for the mosquito
chemstrail ?
Amen.
Also God bless Texas.
J.R. Vasquez 🔹That’s what I was thinking.
@@DL-ik2pl No..... just fuel for conspiratards
anyone noticed airplane is going above the horizon in the beginning because of earth curvature?
Shhhhhhh...
You think earth round? Serious?
Putting clouds in the sky that weren’t there. Effect on environment......wait and see......👍👍👍
I distrust the government as much as anyone on here, but this chemtrail nonsense is one of the dumbest theories I've ever heard.
Yes I buy it, contrails eh? 😀 I can also see the "contrails" in the background😀
@@stephen_crumley just what I thought a coward beta bitch
@@dcrose001 are you describing yourself?
it's condensation. the engines exhaust is ususlly >600°C and the air around is ~-50°C. mixed eith the air pollution and high humidity on that day, contrails form behind and around the plane's engines. that's where the "con" in contrail comes from
Beautiful shot!
Thanks
The one kid in your school: i rip the fatest clouds, not even earth can make fatter clouds
ME: *THIS VIDEO*
?????
*grabs all his weed and a hand full of cigarillos.*
*Watches video on loop for 6 hours.*
Me: still hypnotic.
Don't need to read hundreds of comments to know there's a bunch of stupid comments here.
No truer words have been spoken
So contrails last all day now, mmmkay
Lol idiot post
Yes, yes they do. And we do it over your house just to get you as wound up as we can. Call 911 when you feel your head tingling, it's us. LOL.
@Quick Caliber LMFAO trigger more failure. He is correct.
Conspitards foaming at seeting this
That they do.
Hell of a burnout!
insert generic conspiracy theory comment here
So many of them…..
^^^^disinfo
Nothing goes to windward like diesel. Coolest thing about this is how the wingtip vortices roll the top in.
Yeah, I see it often, and am still amazed every time.
It is not diesel. It is jet fuel. Diesel is not high enough octane to run the engines of a 787.
This is nanodust clouds, not poison. Every time I see cemtrails I know it's gonna rain or snow in a few days.
"This is nanodust clouds"
Ah, God bless the internet.
contrails stand for condensation trails. the air and exhaust coming from the engine is 600°C. when it comes into contact with cold air, it turns into water and steam. it's literally just water. you also make contrails when you breathe in cold weather.
Not contrails chemtrails big difference
Not a person of average or higher IQ; chemtard. Big difference.
@A_Mercer Reading your comments, I am more like pro-depopulation. I would even know where to start.
@A_Mercer Your vaccination relentlessly repeated mantra (what seems to be the only "argument" you have) is totally wasted on me. Due to an, otherwise quite innocuous, medical issue I am exempt from compulsory vaccination. Bummer, isn't it 🙂.
Anyway, no time for idiots. Over and out.
Chemtrails.
wow the size of those wake vortex! wouldn't want to get caught in that!
Yeah, you can see their strength here!
SMART DUST.
Something like that
@@loub747 micro robotic
Snoop seriously need to cut down on his somoking...
Spelled it "Contrails" in the title so "they" wouldn't take the video down for a while. Smart one. 😏
bam!!!!!!! :0)
contrails stand for condensation trails. the air and exhaust coming from the engine is 600°C. when it comes into contact with cold air, it turns into water and steam. it's literally just water. you also make contrails when you breathe in cold weather.
Awesome catch
Thanks
Incredible never seen contrails so dense be4. I love AVIATION!!!
Yeah, the morning light made these look even better.
Wow,thats beautiful
Thanks
You are a stupid being, you want to denounce the chemtrails but you delete the videos of those who take back your videos. fool .
You stole my video and you're mad at me? I don't care what you believe in, that's just not right. Next time ask first. I'll remove the strike against you if you remove the video. Your choice
Thank you very much sir.
I forgot the source in the description of the video, I will put it right away, in the description I will put the link to your video, thank you again for removing the warning.
And forgive me words that I could use.
Do you have a Problem? Chemtrails are NOT real, its just normal condensation
Aluminum... its what's for dinner
Another conspiracy theory? C'mon man -__-
@@flamingmohmohawesome4953 I hope you realize you're doing what the CIA came up with in the sixties. CIA made up the "conspiracy-theorist" culprit to silence critics after JFK was killed and some people were suspecting their own government.
@@flamingmohmohawesome4953 So, guess you're easily fooled.
@@onemanarmyoma0155 the pot calling the kettle black. Your the one easily fooled by these dumb conspiracy theories that lack scientific evidence. Let alone evidence period.
@@onemanarmyoma0155 lol simpleton fuctard confirmed
Would look like an UFO from the ground, especially as when the condensation dew point is bang on above and then below in a matter off seconds.
Wow that engine is powered by water
Something like that! Good times. Lou
Wow, that's so beautiful, the horizon is epic.
Yeah, pretty morning.
Dong bullshit.
Yeah, perfectly flat!!!
@@rodneycaupp5962 Rodney crapp
This is how we all get sick and at the same time make the medicine industry rich
CHEMTRAILS.......................................
@@rodneycaupp5962 Actually these are only "wingtip vortices", a natural pure aerodynamical effect, that are made visible y high humidity
Here are some others :
ruclips.net/video/dfY5ZQDzC5s/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/BaRb46vv_bQ/видео.html