It's funny how many views he gets relative to other speakers. Not downplaying others' lectures, its just that Ben really brings another element that is hard to replicate. He is just naturally charismatic and witty.
Really? The constantly yammering and superficial analysis are unwatchable. Finegold actually made a Karpov game too painful to watch. No offense, but are you a teenager?
Like, all of your children have no talent; yes you parents at home. They play some memorized opening they coach taught them, lose, there coach said they played it wrong; try again and loose again then they give up on Chess and play hockey. Then lose in hockey also!
It's insane how many good instructive chess analysis from GMs are there for free. Thank you for posting such high quality content for free :) I was stuck on 1500 for almost 2 years and now im getting better ever since i started watching your videos. You are promoting chess in a just most beautiful manner. Greetings from Serbia!
Karpov was a much better player than people give him credit for. Not only was he superb in the Ruy Lopez but he crushed other players in the Sicilian Defense, in fact, outside of Kasparov, Karpov beat almost everyone else who played the Sicilian against him.
Oh yes, Karpov was one of the very greatest and if his first world title match v Kasparov in 84 hadn't been so long he might well be rated the greatest player ever. It took Kasparov 32 games to win a game in that match; his stamina and grit saved him, but he would have lost 4-0 after 12 games, also after 24 games, or 5-0 after 30 games. Karpov's quality took him to another level
and nothing for nothing if you think about it yeah kasparov beat karpov 2xs technically maybe 3 ALL the game points came down to like 1 point of half point one time. no one blew anyone out the water like fischer did to spassky
Marko Kostic No, Karpov is inarguably one of the greatest chess players of all time. As far as I'm concerned he beat Kasparov in their 1984/1985 world championship match. Kasparov and Karpov were basically equal in strength. The thing with Fischer is he dominated like no other had before or since, a young Karpov would be no match for Fischer (assuming he kept playing), 1975, 1978 (my prediction is 12.5-6.5) WC matched would end with comfortable wins for Bobby. Karpov would have become a greater player than he did in our timelines (but, again, so would Fischer) by 81 it might be a close victory for Fischer (12.5-10.5), but by 84, age might get the better of him and its possible Karpov wins (12.5-11.5). If Fischer retires after the 85 match, and Kasparov never plays him, I'm confident Karpov would been the superior player to Kasparov throughout their careers, the rivalry with Fischer would be invaluable and he'd have learned so much about chess. As the matches against Fischer would essentially be chess lessons. Thinking about it makes me quite sad, the best of Fischer, is never to be seen he never reached his potential, and Karpov remained forever unable to play Bobby.
Mato Jelic is great too! I enjoy quite a few of them tbh. Seirawans are really deep. Schrantz are similar to Finegold. Kingscrushers are extremely in depth and Mato always chooses phenomenal games and keeps them digestible.
+arsenalfanrichi id recommend you john bartholomew's climbing the rating ladder/instructional videos then. they are straightforward and really instructive chess notions although no flashy games from superGM are covered
The Ruy Lopez opening seems to build up slowly and rely on position and slow expansion of space...at the same time, it can be sneaky aggressive. Love Ben's lectures!!
Karpov is a beast, true positional player. People were scared of him, even Kasparov had a tough time with him. The only problem I think is Kasparov's more detailed approach to concrete analysis, while Karpov was overly focused on General strategy.
Karpov was up 5-0 with a bunch of draws against Kasparov in their first match. That would normally be a slam-dunk win. Kasparov was shocked at how good Karpov was, since he had buzzed through all the challengers.
In the last Karpov game 41:45, Bc3 was played instead of c5 because of the tactical shot Bxc5! if Qxc5 then just Qxc5 followed by Rxd2. if bxc5 then Qxa5 is winning.
wow it took me like 20 finegold videos to get the C4 being an explosive move joke. Im the reason hes always making fun of the audience at home, sorry guys
I absolutely love Ben finegold! Honestly his personality’s more refreshing than sprite, which (if you’ve watched the commercials) we all know is shockingly refreshing. (This video was very helpful. I appreciate it!)
Awesome lecture. Thank you so much for all your hard work putting this together. This channel has been fantastic for learning chess and makes me love the game so much more. also, your humor is so point. it's dorky in many good ways. :)
At 21:38 .... Rg8 could White play Rxd6 then Qxd6, Nxg6, Rxg6, Qh5+, Rh6, Qxh6+, Kxh6, Nf5+, Kg7, then Nxd6. White is down the exchange but has compensation being two pawns up. (By the way I am only a 1550 so I might be wrong)
I've seen both spellings. Petroff was the English spelling used in Kasparov's books (which may have been his editors' choices). If you want to be technical, the rest of the world calls it Russian Game and his name was actually Петро́в. But go ahead and nitpick if you're up to it.
Actually, "Petroff" is the German spelling. Petrov's studies about this defense, which was thought to be incorrect until he examined it, were first translated to German and thus the Petroff spelling. Anyway as you said, in many countries it is known as the Russian game; not everywhere though, as in Spain (my country, but many others as well) it's most commonly referred to as the Petrov, with a "v", since no one uses anymore the German original spelling for the name of the player (although it is true that it's still used to name the opening). Not even Germans, who now transcript it as Petrow (but call it Russian game). Just a bit of trivia. Anyway you're right, I'm not trying to argue, just to contribute!
At around 6:57 Ben suggests Spasky moved his knight from c6 back to b8 so as to potentially reposition the knight to attack whites bishop via b8, d7, c5, the whites bishop retreats to the second rank and on white’s next turn he can kick the knight by moving his pawn to b4. If you are in this starting position and your goal is to attack white’s bishop on b3 then moving your knight back to b8 wastes tempo and allows your knight to be attacked (if your goal is to move your knight to b8 so as to reposition to d7 and the e6 or the like, then moving the knight back makes sense). A better knight move is from c6 directly to a5, forcing whites bishop back to c2, and if white the moves his pawn to b4 to kick your knight... you can now place your knight on the c4 square, and if black plays pawn d3, you can maneuver your knight to b6, which adds further protection to the d5 square (already protected by the other knight to f6) for a eventual pawn break.
You are missing the point. The Breyer opening as the Tchigorin aim less as to attack the b3 bishop than to consolidate the center with c5 or Nd7. If you want to kill the bishop go for the Taimanov variation ( 4. Ba4 b5 5.Bb3 Na5 6....Nxb3)
41:57 -- Interesting that the engine doesn't like moving the knight to f3; of the nine lines examined, it's the least-liked. 43:40 -- Black should have been maneuvering his bishops to better squares instead of Rd4? He drops a full engine point here, and gets steadily worse hereon. 45:56 -- Qe8?? ...The engine has been marking Bg7 as the best move turn-after-turn for quite some time, and Black steadfastly refused to play it. Qc7 would also have prevented the impending king-rook fork.
I think you are using low depth. Complex positions typicallh require quite a bit of time for accurate results. Sacrifices and such sometimes need forcing to get an engine to evaluate them.
if ...Qxb4, Bxg7 is very dangerous for black. After ... Kxg7, Rxd7 puts white up material in the exchange and, more importantly, the position and coordination of white's pieces is overwhelming, while black's rook and knight are struggling to get to relevant outposts. Engines put the ensuing position at around +20.
Finegold. If people are paying attention to life and all the nuggets it gives you, a name like this should give them pause. I, too, was put off a bit by his humor, as this audience clearly was (buncha zombies, how do you not ‘lol’ in the first 10 mins?). But this is gold and I’m grateful to have found it.
Thank You Sir! 6:09 Karpov is King of Chess also Kasparov, they are genius i knew personally welll, Portisch Lajos may look atound my favorite is Topalov and Kramnik
I love Ruy Lopez opening! 😁 had the game gone the way @21:56, white wins the Queen with Nxg6 - Rxg6, Qh5+ - Kg7 (protect g6 rook), Rxd6 - Qxd6 ( or lose 2nd Knight), Nf5+ forks the black King and Queen while the Ruy Lopez bishop is ready to breathe fire down the G8 diagonal. 👍
My time with the Ruy was misspent youth. It was the Fischer era and there was nobody to train me and a bunch of Fischer Ruy games. Everybody played Ruy and Sicilian which are DEEP, DEEP, DEEP openings. It's easy to go 30 moves and still be in book! And that was before computers (that were good).
In the first game did he made him when he plaa at the end G6 pawn on G5? I think black has than a chance or? Can someone help me because i sea there no mate?
In an open position bishop's are superior for their range. In a closed position knights are superior for their mobility (they can go to every square). End games are by definition open positions, hence why strong player prefer to hold on to them unless for a good reason (i.e. a mating pattern or significant material advantage)
When you want to become a stand up comedian but end up being a chess grandmaster
@@GrowingFatherchess grandpa master
He’s pretty much the only GM with any charm at all. The rest border on autistic. Just being honest here. Magnus is one boring person when he speaks.
Dude is funny 😂
@@ChinaNumbaOne1 he is a natural at this.
20:37 that “umm” is the exact note and timbre of the opening note of “All Star”
some
one of the greatest youtube comments of all time
Glorious
@@avexus7756 body
@@garrettsmith6549 once
A 50 minute Finegold lecture just honestly made my day :)
It's funny how many views he gets relative to other speakers. Not downplaying others' lectures, its just that Ben really brings another element that is hard to replicate. He is just naturally charismatic and witty.
+ATL yep same
Really? The constantly yammering and superficial analysis are unwatchable.
Finegold actually made a Karpov game too painful to watch.
No offense, but are you a teenager?
?
Blair Schirmer
What I like about Ben Finegold is how he intertwines real life in his jokes to teach people valueable lessons.
And the Simpsons.
Guy is hilarious...But instructive
Like "never move your pawns"? :D
Like, all of your children have no talent; yes you parents at home. They play some memorized opening they coach taught them, lose, there coach said they played it wrong; try again and loose again then they give up on Chess and play hockey.
Then lose in hockey also!
Also: never play f6!
“He stopped g6 better than you guys did. He resigned.”
Hahahahahahaha
It's insane how many good instructive chess analysis from GMs are there for free. Thank you for posting such high quality content for free :) I was stuck on 1500 for almost 2 years and now im getting better ever since i started watching your videos. You are promoting chess in a just most beautiful manner. Greetings from Serbia!
Me before the apocalypse : "Oh but it's ok, a6 is defended"
Karpov was a much better player than people give him credit for. Not only was he superb in the Ruy Lopez but he crushed other players in the Sicilian Defense, in fact, outside of Kasparov, Karpov beat almost everyone else who played the Sicilian against him.
Oh yes, Karpov was one of the very greatest and if his first world title match v Kasparov in 84 hadn't been so long he might well be rated the greatest player ever. It took Kasparov 32 games to win a game in that match; his stamina and grit saved him, but he would have lost 4-0 after 12 games, also after 24 games, or 5-0 after 30 games. Karpov's quality took him to another level
***** Ask Fischer fans about Karpov. They think that Karpov is bad.
***** It's not an odd generalization, it's just my experience with people in the chess community.
and nothing for nothing if you think about it yeah kasparov beat karpov 2xs technically maybe 3 ALL the game points came down to like 1 point of half point one time. no one blew anyone out the water like fischer did to spassky
Marko Kostic No, Karpov is inarguably one of the greatest chess players of all time. As far as I'm concerned he beat Kasparov in their 1984/1985 world championship match.
Kasparov and Karpov were basically equal in strength.
The thing with Fischer is he dominated like no other had before or since, a young Karpov would be no match for Fischer (assuming he kept playing), 1975, 1978 (my prediction is 12.5-6.5) WC matched would end with comfortable wins for Bobby. Karpov would have become a greater player than he did in our timelines (but, again, so would Fischer) by 81 it might be a close victory for Fischer (12.5-10.5), but by 84, age might get the better of him and its possible Karpov wins (12.5-11.5). If Fischer retires after the 85 match, and Kasparov never plays him, I'm confident Karpov would been the superior player to Kasparov throughout their careers, the rivalry with Fischer would be invaluable and he'd have learned so much about chess. As the matches against Fischer would essentially be chess lessons.
Thinking about it makes me quite sad, the best of Fischer, is never to be seen he never reached his potential, and Karpov remained forever unable to play Bobby.
Someone says "IM Norm" to you, just say "Nice to meet you Norm, my name's Ben"
How does Ben not do stand up.. His humor is so entertaining
"when your rating goes up, you like bishops more" 😆😆😆 I like that 👍👍👍
Thank you very much. Ben Finegold videos are my favorite chess videos by far.
Mato Jelic is great too! I enjoy quite a few of them tbh. Seirawans are really deep. Schrantz are similar to Finegold. Kingscrushers are extremely in depth and Mato always chooses phenomenal games and keeps them digestible.
+arsenalfanrichi id recommend you john bartholomew's climbing the rating ladder/instructional videos then. they are straightforward and really instructive chess notions although no flashy games from superGM are covered
+Timothy Barth Yep, sorry, forgot to mention Johns videos... They're great too! And he gives good insight into the precognition good players have
Let's say you are playing Kasparov.. You should probably wake up at that point 😆😆😆 made my day!!! ben at his finest
@AJ De Luna you may same in a dreamer but I'm not the only one
@@gamblinggator3177 You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.
Ben at his finegoldest
@@gnpar lmao
I just started watching this, and I absolutely love Ben Finegold's humor. I'm surprised I'm not hearing roaring laughter from the audience.
They're not miked, so you wouldn't hear it.
Stupid audience
The Ruy Lopez opening seems to build up slowly and rely on position and slow expansion of space...at the same time, it can be sneaky aggressive. Love Ben's lectures!!
ben: "c4..."
me: which is explosive
ben: "...which is explosive"
we're vibing
lol
*"Rawer"-GM Ben Finegold*
Today is my birthday and I get a new Ben Finegold lecture as a present. Yay!
happy bd!!❤😁
happy bday :)
happy birthday Jessica
TERRIBLE!!!! xD
Evert Clowting very suspicious
I have learned more from you and as such my game has improved substainsu..substansual...a lot...thanks much.
Ba dum tsss
Substantially
Karpov is a beast, true positional player. People were scared of him, even Kasparov had a tough time with him. The only problem I think is Kasparov's more detailed approach to concrete analysis, while Karpov was overly focused on General strategy.
John Brown Kasparov has an all time +2 score against Karpov , something like that
Karpov was up 5-0 with a bunch of draws against Kasparov in their first match. That would normally be a slam-dunk win. Kasparov was shocked at how good Karpov was, since he had buzzed through all the challengers.
If Jonah hill was a grand master
Jonah Hill *is* a grandmaster... Of ACTING
hey kids, you will be this in 40 years, get out and exercise
LMAO
@@Hoobyj for my money he looks more like Ethan Suplee
i lost interest in chess long time ago
but i still watch every ben finegold video for his humor
Why lost interest in chess ?
+The Dardans too hard for me
About 1-2 years ago I was really bad,I had a chess class.I just practiced and got better
I once beat the level 5 computer on chess.com without coaching....for real...that is my best victory so far.
John Tatum Congratzzzz!! Haha.. still struggling at level 8 :(
Ben you are brilliant man so funny but still the lesson is so instructive even with al the jokes, a joy to watch and listen
In the last Karpov game 41:45, Bc3 was played instead of c5 because of the tactical shot Bxc5! if Qxc5 then just Qxc5 followed by Rxd2. if bxc5 then Qxa5 is winning.
Ben Finegold gives such entertaining lectures!
“Breaking one of my rules... never move pawns.” *shrugs nonchalantly*
😂 that killed me
wow it took me like 20 finegold videos to get the C4 being an explosive move joke. Im the reason hes always making fun of the audience at home, sorry guys
its ok hes probably making fun of me too i just am not aware of it yet
Thanks for the comment I have just got the joke now
That was an excellent lecture with well chosen games. Thank you :)
How does this man makes chess hilarious?
Only two days and already > 10,000 views! You're well loved, Ben Finegold!
Love the Karpov lectures. Hope Ben's doing okay after Korchnois passing
means he can move up in the rankings
+newenglandsun :)
arsenalfanrichi i
Awesome Teacher and Chess Player.. I wish I could attend his class.
That Karpov-Spassky game was really instructive.
Back and forth between funny and hard to listen to, excellent insight thought
another nice lecture
20:27
"yeah, well, he stopped it better than you guys. he resigned" got me chuckling
I absolutely love Ben finegold! Honestly his personality’s more refreshing than sprite, which (if you’ve watched the commercials) we all know is shockingly refreshing.
(This video was very helpful. I appreciate it!)
rofl love his face when he ask questions no on knows the answer for (which happens 90% of the time)
This guy is the Rich Evans of Chess.
I wish Richevans was this funny!
‘I can’t take my eyes off of him’ - Julia Roberts on A-list Celebrity Rich Evans
Finally Finegold!
Awesome lecture. Thank you so much for all your hard work putting this together. This channel has been fantastic for learning chess and makes me love the game so much more.
also, your humor is so point. it's dorky in many good ways. :)
At 21:38 .... Rg8 could White play Rxd6 then Qxd6, Nxg6, Rxg6, Qh5+, Rh6, Qxh6+, Kxh6, Nf5+, Kg7, then Nxd6. White is down the exchange but has compensation being two pawns up.
(By the way I am only a 1550 so I might be wrong)
There should be a video about the Petroff Defense
it's not ''petroff'' but ''petrov''
I've seen both spellings. Petroff was the English spelling used in Kasparov's books (which may have been his editors' choices). If you want to be technical, the rest of the world calls it Russian Game and his name was actually Петро́в. But go ahead and nitpick if you're up to it.
XD
Actually, "Petroff" is the German spelling. Petrov's studies about this defense, which was thought to be incorrect until he examined it, were first translated to German and thus the Petroff spelling. Anyway as you said, in many countries it is known as the Russian game; not everywhere though, as in Spain (my country, but many others as well) it's most commonly referred to as the Petrov, with a "v", since no one uses anymore the German original spelling for the name of the player (although it is true that it's still used to name the opening). Not even Germans, who now transcript it as Petrow (but call it Russian game).
Just a bit of trivia. Anyway you're right, I'm not trying to argue, just to contribute!
red nac No, go ahead. That was fascinating
At around 6:57 Ben suggests Spasky moved his knight from c6 back to b8 so as to potentially reposition the knight to attack whites bishop via b8, d7, c5, the whites bishop retreats to the second rank and on white’s next turn he can kick the knight by moving his pawn to b4. If you are in this starting position and your goal is to attack white’s bishop on b3 then moving your knight back to b8 wastes tempo and allows your knight to be attacked (if your goal is to move your knight to b8 so as to reposition to d7 and the e6 or the like, then moving the knight back makes sense). A better knight move is from c6 directly to a5, forcing whites bishop back to c2, and if white the moves his pawn to b4 to kick your knight... you can now place your knight on the c4 square, and if black plays pawn d3, you can maneuver your knight to b6, which adds further protection to the d5 square (already protected by the other knight to f6) for a eventual pawn break.
You are missing the point. The Breyer opening as the Tchigorin aim less as to attack the b3 bishop than to consolidate the center with c5 or Nd7. If you want to kill the bishop go for the Taimanov variation ( 4. Ba4 b5 5.Bb3 Na5 6....Nxb3)
41:57 -- Interesting that the engine doesn't like moving the knight to f3; of the nine lines examined, it's the least-liked.
43:40 -- Black should have been maneuvering his bishops to better squares instead of Rd4? He drops a full engine point here, and gets steadily worse hereon.
45:56 -- Qe8?? ...The engine has been marking Bg7 as the best move turn-after-turn for quite some time, and Black steadfastly refused to play it. Qc7 would also have prevented the impending king-rook fork.
I think you are using low depth. Complex positions typicallh require quite a bit of time for accurate results. Sacrifices and such sometimes need forcing to get an engine to evaluate them.
"Am I having a stroke?" That's my new favorite Finegold line.
Really glad to see Ben lecturing again.
R.I.P Viktor Korchnoi :(
Oh, sorry to hear that :(
Damn i would have wanted to hear him in person.
Karpov's play is formative. Not everyone is a tactical genius but Karpov is a strategical master. The Strategist of his era and formidable.
at 17:23 instead of black ... Knight to D6 why not Queenx B4 and THEN knight D6?
if ...Qxb4, Bxg7 is very dangerous for black. After ... Kxg7, Rxd7 puts white up material in the exchange and, more importantly, the position and coordination of white's pieces is overwhelming, while black's rook and knight are struggling to get to relevant outposts. Engines put the ensuing position at around +20.
ben finegold , thank you a lot
video on how to defend as white in marshall gambit.... plzzz
I've watched this video several times! Amazing value I think
I think I can watch finegold videos forever
Finegold. If people are paying attention to life and all the nuggets it gives you, a name like this should give them pause. I, too, was put off a bit by his humor, as this audience clearly was (buncha zombies, how do you not ‘lol’ in the first 10 mins?). But this is gold and I’m grateful to have found it.
I enjoy his lectures. diamonds in the rough
Ben must like the training method of beat you up to build you up, so mean to those kids. lol
What player are they talking about at 4:20? I can't make out the name.
excellent discussion
at 15:08 why not bishop take c4?wins a pawn,no?
Why did i just watch a 50 min video about chess strategies when i barely know how the pieces move?
“And he plays C4, which is explosive.”
Fuck off lmao
Very informative
Excellent study.
In the first game what the white should move after black ....g5?
Thank You Sir! 6:09 Karpov is King of Chess also Kasparov, they are genius i knew personally welll, Portisch Lajos may look atound my favorite is Topalov and Kramnik
Yay, more Ben! :D
1:04 when a 14 year old girl talking about her crush
In newer videos and guides explaining the Ruy lopez I see A3 getting played over C3 (not necessarily on move 8). Anyone know why's that?
32:57 How do they call it in russian?
I love Ruy Lopez opening! 😁 had the game gone the way @21:56, white wins the Queen with Nxg6 - Rxg6, Qh5+ - Kg7 (protect g6 rook), Rxd6 - Qxd6 ( or lose 2nd Knight), Nf5+ forks the black King and Queen while the Ruy Lopez bishop is ready to breathe fire down the G8 diagonal. 👍
My time with the Ruy was misspent youth. It was the Fischer era and there was nobody to train me and a bunch of Fischer Ruy games. Everybody played Ruy and Sicilian which are DEEP, DEEP, DEEP openings. It's easy to go 30 moves and still be in book! And that was before computers (that were good).
In the first game did he made him when he plaa at the end G6 pawn on G5?
I think black has than a chance or?
Can someone help me because i sea there no mate?
Can you make a video about Bc5 instead of Bd7?
21:51 rook x d6, queen x d6 , bishop x c4, black moves whatever, knight to f5 , pawn x f5, queen h5+.
go ben finegold great lecture.suggestion for opening class french advance or english main line
Quién es el Argentino que respondío al minuto 5:18?
El papu gomez
Total noob here. What is the software they use to present the games in these videos?
Ben Finegold is so funny when he lifts his hand in gesticulation and it seems like he´s going to checkmate.... ;)
Why should I like Bishops more than Knights or Castles? Range?
In an open position bishop's are superior for their range. In a closed position knights are superior for their mobility (they can go to every square). End games are by definition open positions, hence why strong player prefer to hold on to them unless for a good reason (i.e. a mating pattern or significant material advantage)
@@failfirst3158 Thanks! Makes sense.
who would win?
b7 bishop or a1 rook
Is he the best teacher in the world? I think so
The answer is fries
How do you call 'this position' in Russian?
Does anyone know the engine or GUI he's using that lets him draw arrows?
RPGgamer1010220 chessbase I think
Did Kasparov ever played the Ruy Lopez with black against Karpov?
Someone know that by a chance?
what opening starts with e3?
Does Ruy rhyme with Louie?
Yes. More or less
Do you know what is the chess software they use?
I just find Ben to be so entertaining .
23:35 is perfect.
jumped up from my homework to check Ben!
Haha same here!
Where is the Caruana lecture?
This guy is a pure gold, id say a fine pure gold, ba dum tsss
Do you think this is an original thought? This is nothing new. Ben Finegold has been fine gold.
@@mickeyrube6623 Ive been waiting 3 years for someone to respond
if c4 is "explosive", b4 is "polish-ed" ;) :) ... funniest chess teaching lessons I have ever enjoyed . Thumbs up :)
It was 1974. I I favored this one chess club, because it was right across the street from a pawn shop.
He should have verified the statement by Miles. Beliavsky had plenty of draws and sometimes even wins from the black side of the closed Ruy Lopez.
“He stopped it better than you guys he resigned”
I was half expecting the rest of the video to be censored after Ben said, "I'm very opinionated."
what means "sharp" sicilian?
Dago 64 the word sharp in chess terminology means a position in which a lot of tactical línea and calculation are involved
Charismatic man.
Tread lightly