Federer vs Djokovic - All 50 H2H Match Points (HD)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 апр 2020
- Subscribe for more H2H videos !
Full list of matches:
Year • Winner • Tournament-Round • Score
2006 • Federer • Monte Carlo - R64 • 6-3 2-6 6-3
2006 • Federer • Davis Cup - WG Play-offs • 6-3 6-2 6-3
2007 • Federer • Australian Open - R16 • 6-2 7-5 6-3
2007 • Federer • Dubai - QF • 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3
2007 • Djokovic • Montreal - F • 7-6(2) 2-6 7-6(2)
2007 • Federer • US Open - F • 7-6(4) 7-6(2) 6-4
2008 • Djokovic • Australian Open - SF • 7-5 6-3 7-6(5)
2008 • Federer • Monte Carlo - SF • 6-3 3-2 Ret.
2008 • Federer • US Open - SF • 6-3 5-7 7-5 6-2
2009 • Djokovic • Miami - SF • 3-6 6-2 6-3
2009 • Djokovic • Rome - SF • 4-6 6-3 6-3
2009 • Federer • Cincinnati - F • 6-1 7-5
2009 • Federer • US Open - SF • 7-6(3) 7-5 7-5
2009 • Djokovic • Basel - F • 6-4 4-6 6-2
2010 • Federer • Montreal -SF • 6-1 3-6 7-5
2010 • Djokovic • US Open - SF • 5-7 6-1 5-7 6-2 7-5
2010 • Federer• Shanghai - SF • 7-5 6-4
2010 • Federer • Basel - F • 6-5 3-6 6-1
2010 • Federer • WTF - SF • 6-1 6-4
2011 • Djokovic • Australian Open - SF • 7-6(3) 7-5 6-4
2011 • Djokovic • Dubai - F • 6-3 6-3
2011 • Djokovic • Indian Wells - SF • 6-3 3-6 6-2
2011 • Federer • French Open - SF • 7-6(5) 6-3 3-6 7-6(5)
2011 • Djokovic • US Open - SF • 6-7(7) 4-6 6-3 6-2 7-5
2012 • Djokovic • Roma - SF • 6-2 7-6(4)
2012 • Djokovic • French Open - SF • 6-4 7-5 6-3
2012 • Federer • Wimbledon- SF • 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-3
2012 • Federer • Cincinnati - F • 6-0 7-6(7)
2012 • Djokovic • WTF - F • 7-6(6) 7-5
2013 • Djokovic • Paris - SF • 4-6 6-3 6-2
2013 • Djokovic • WTF - RR • 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2
2014 • Federer • Dubai - SF • 3-6 6-3 6-2
2014 • Djokovic • Indian Wells - F • 3-6 6-3 7-6(3)
2014 • Federer • Monte Carlo - SF • 7-5 6-2
2014 • Djokovic • Wimbledon - F • 6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(4) 5-7 6-4
2014 • Federer • Shanghai - SF • 6-4 6-4
-2014 • (Djokovic) • WTF - F • Walkover
2015 • Federer • Dubai - F • 6-3 7-5
2015 • Djokovic • Indian Wells - F • 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2
2015 • Djokovic • Roma - F • 6-4 6-3
2015 • Djokovic • Wimbledon - F • 7-6(1) 6-7(10) 6-4 6-3
2015 • Federer • Cincinnati - F • 7-6(1) 6-3
2015 • Djokovic • US Open - F • 6-4 5-7 6-4 6-4
2015 • Federer • WTF - RR • 7-5 6-2
2015 • Djokovic • WTF - F • 6-3 6-4
2016 • Djokovic • Australian Open - SF • 6-1 6-2 3-6 6-3
2018 • Djokovic • Cincinnati - F • 6-4 6-4
2018 • Djokovic • Paris - SF • 7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(3)
2019 • Djokovic • Wimbledon - F • 7-6(5) 1-6 7-6(4) 4-6 13-12(3)
2019 • Federer • WTF - RR • 6-4 6-3
2020 • Djokovic • Australian Open - SF • 7-6(1) 6-4 6-3
#H2H #tennis 
Спорт
I like how nole looks so happy even after he loses, he gets angry while playing the game but.. He actually was looking up to Roger.
Novak is really great with handshakes, always gracious in victory and defeat.
@@olivernaude3793 Yeah, he's so gracious when he cries for medical time outs when he's even remotely losing the match. And smashing rackets and hitting balls off line judges when he's still losing. Very humble guy
@@pandadares8905 indeed my fellow curry
@@pandadares8905 cry me a river looser...
@@pandadares8905 cry more
As a Fed fan, I'll always admire and respect Novak for being so gracious at the net, whether he won or loss. Sure it would be easy to do it the past decade, but for the first few years of their rivalry, he would lose most of the matches, but always graciously smiled and hugged Roger at the end.
It's not Roger's fault nor Djokovic s but federal fans could only celebrate the first 4 to 8 games later we know who became the goat
DJOKER🙂🐐
got to admit, Federer is a salty/sore loser while Novak is always offering a smile in defeat.
It's incredible how in every match won by Federer commentators would explode into emotion but when Novak won they said nothing
Western bias! but we know who the clear 🐐 is!
That's not Roger's fault
@@rag7027 yep. It’s Federer. 😂🤣
@@calebcrawford2520 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭
@@techgamerwwe8917 of course it's not his fault, but that doesn't make it less true.
Things began to change on 2011 between these two. It's also incredible how many times Djokovic has won after saving match points.
after novak got out of his teenage years he started beating him regularly and theres no doubt on whos better here
@@nikolapostic I agree. My list of best players is based on H2H matches.
First place:
Novak Djokovic
Second place:
Rafael Nadal
Third:
Roger Federer
@@nikolapostic yep. Federer is better. If you go strictly by H2H, then using your logic means Davydenko is better than Nadal since Davydenko retired with a positive H2H against Nadal (6-5). If you go by all the stats and everything combined, Federer is clearly better.
@@calebcrawford2520 specious point. 11 H2H matches vs 50. Which one's more representative?
@@nielssorensen9856 It's a very valid point, actually. There is a lot more to it than H2H when deciding who's better than another.
Nole always greets every opponent at the net at the end of each match warmly, no matter whether his opponent is World #1 or World #600, and whether he wins or loses.
Something that needs recognition, and an example to follow by every player
I like how Federer was progressively more celebratory as Djokovic grew to be a more and more serious player.
10:22 - 10:27 You can see that Novak was really upset but still congratulated Federer in a well manner
Nole is wolf in sheep clothing when losing he seems to be gracious however inside he is not he is a real joker
Why was Novak on the verge of breaking down there? Anything especially important?
@@ketan6182 I think it may have been due to his grandfather passing in the duration of Monte Carlo 2014 and I think he wanted to win for his grandfather
@@ketan6182 I think he was sort of hurt in this match, his mobility was affected, i remember announcers talking about it when i watched it.
@Dj_M1 Do you expect him to after he has lost badly? There is nothing wrong with not looking your opponent in the eye. I wouldn't have done that either
Djokovic: no matter lost or won he smiles openly, looks straight in the eyes and finds the time to say few pleasant words.
Federer: just cold handshake, no eye contact and no matter lost or won he goes away first.
Does only I see this arrogant disgusting behavior without true sportsmansip spirit from the other one?
And I was grown looking at Fed's matches as masterpieces of the game.
Yes roger is a sore looooser
They have played 20 finals, Roger 6 times went home with the trophy.
They played 19 deciding sets, Roger won only 5.
Novak is clutch, he is clearly ahead of him in this department. Federer becomes uncomfortable against him.
@@ketan6182 Wow! That puts in perspective just how much Djokovic is leads ahead of Federer in their H2H when clutch moments happen
@Barış Alkan wats the age difference between thiem and nole !?
@Barış Alkan if at all, it should improve. I can understand physical strength reducing, but after experience, you're supposed to get tougher.
@@guruk nole was born in 1987, thiem in 1993
So many finals and semifinals of GS and master 1000, incredible rivalry !!
most completed and balance rivalry since both play in the primer oe the other, but never coincidence in both primers because of the gap age 6 years.
This wasn't balanced... Roger had big advantage, and Novak had to overcome pressure and break the best ever. He is beating Roger for 10 years now, and he is still underrated. That is fillig him with fuel, and that drives him to be the best ever...
@@milutinitc4937 Djokovic is not underrated, is the best of the big 3, only their haters think is not the best.
Echange de bons procédés, mon vieux!
@@eduvr7655 he’s the worst of the big 3
I just love to see how Feds attitude changed when he started losing
Totally True !
Möngi
You can see Nole was always gracious even in defeat. He deserves more recognition from fans and joins Fed and Rafa in GOAT chase.
He does I agree ... but seeing that everywhere puts me off and also the minority of Nole fans (Djokotards) also put many Fedal fans off Djokovic. Same goes for the others.
nole joins this duo before a couple of years and he shows who the real goat is
@Anubhav Mahapatra yeah but if novak played in federers time where wasnt many good players nole would have 25 grand slames
When you wrote it, it was 20-20-17. Now it is 20-20-20 and EVERYONE SAYS NOLE IS THE GOAT!
@Anubhav Mahapatra you can see Novak's class in handling the defeats. Always with a smile, never salty. As far as the flair goes, if it's the measure of greatness, we should give Kyrgios 10 grand slams for flair and talent only. The only measure at the end, for 3 players that are contemporaries and are so close, will be the trophies.
5:38 A GOAT is born
O tu che porti la saggezza che è più profonda dell'oceano più profondo e che supera la più alta delle alte montagne, possano i tuoi commenti essere letti fino alla fine dei tempi!
@@aggemaarleuthet5566 Do you realize that no one knows Spanish and Portuguese. Write in English
@@jakovstojkovic8851 that's Italian
@@fakereality5204 It doesn't matter
@@jakovstojkovic8851 буквално ликови не знају енглески јбт
Love the fact that djokovic had a wider smile the 4 times Federer beat him than the one time he finally won.
8:54 best match point
14:46 too
@@sriram8339 14:30 is a bit better for sure
Its the rivalry where noone ever clearly could get on top of the other. Roger in his older years always managed to put some wins in there as well. The majority of big matches though clearly going to novak. He broke federer in the us open and wimbledon mentally multiple times
Incorrect. Djokovic is clearly on top.
@David H. Ospina You mean the ones where Djokovic won all of them?
Yeah it began specifically during the 2 US Open semis during 2010-2011 where Federer had multiple match points but snatched defeat from the jaws of victory, last year's Wimbledon final was just pathetic mental incapacity to press home his advantage despite out playing Novak case in point during the first set tie break he missed 2 sitter forehands & those fine margins were the difference between winning & losing!!!
I think even the 2015 US Open final where he had like 23 break points against Novak & only converted like I think 2!!! WTF!!!
@David H. Ospina well - those Matches, except for the 2015 final were mightily close. Novak won the bigger ones and though has an egde. What i am pointing out is that he could never supress Roger for an entire season or longer period of time - other then nadal. Roger always managed sensible wins during that period ( french open 2011, wimby 2012, dubai and shanghai 14, dubai 15 + WTF 15 and so on ) + multiple super close matches that he lost.
@@tvtotalforever You're contradicting yourself. The fact that Novak has had long stretches of dominance with Rodger sneaking in a win here and there proves the point that Novak has a clear advantage.
I am not a djokovic or federer fan boy but I noticed how Djokovic was so gracious in defeat every time but after when Federer got defeated he gives a blunt handshake. Or is it just me
No, I think Federer later on in their respective careers gave excellent handshakes to Djokovic even in defeats. Watch the last five minutes of this video.
Early on yeah a bit but later years Federer gave good handshakes
No one has harmed Federer as Nole did, so consistently...I remember all those Federer fans claiming over and over he was the GOAT, at the same time Djoker proved them otherwise, just imagine how Roger felt... He believed firmly in his head he was the best, eve if Nadal was eating the apple since quite the beginning of his prime, and now came a Joker who ate his confidence forever. Nobody nowadays would say Roger was the best in this sport, now everybody accept it is Novak
It was that moment that Roger realized Novak will surpass him. I like Federer and he was great, but he will forever be salty. He thought he was preordained to be the GOAT. Heck, we all thought that.
@@imanolduhalde Federer played with Prime Nalbandian, Agassi, Safin, Hewitt, Kuerten, Del Potro, Nadal, Davydyenko, Ferrer, Henman, Moya, Haas, Roddick , Coria I can list endlessly dude DJokovic played in era of 3 maybe 4 big names which include Federer and Nadal,
Federer passed through the era of big names he defeated Sampras in Wimbledon when djokovic was 15 years old... You have no idea what You talking about honestly Djokovic is the luckiest tennis player in history.
Federer was still able to beat Djokovic from time to time but not in the important matches which shows how it was all mental.
Stamina is the key. Being 6 yrs older (when you are in your 30s) than Novak on slow courts means a lot in tennis. His body gives up in the end.
@@Aman-nk5uq Djokovic and Nadal are still beating younger players than them. Also don’t forget that when the big three meet usually it’s in the semi finals or finals so it’s not as a Federer is not playing a high-level and meeting them in the early rounds. Usually he was crushing everyone else before these losses. It’s all mental because when the stakes are not high like a round robin he is able to win but when it’s a slam even if he gets match points he chokes against Djokovic. But Tennis wise and physically he still had everything.
I guess Nadal becoming year end no.1 wasn't important.🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@whfan007 quick question: do u play any sport?
The big 3 getting older. The difference Novak getting older getting better..
Federer has not beaten Djokovic in a Grand Slam since Wimbledon 2012 that's crazy how good Novak is in Grand Slams against Roger
7-1 in grand slams & masters finals for Djoko !
@@philippecal6787 quite a stat when they played a total of 1 grandslam final between 2005 and 2013😂😂😂 U guys are hilarious.
Wimbledon 2019?
@@Aman-nk5uq i really dont know why Roger is still playing profesional tennis cause you fed's fans are counting years from 2005-2012/13. Now its 2021, you are hilarious 🤣
Get back to me when Djokovic is playing in his late thirties and still making grand slam finals and winning them well past 35 years old. Then we can talk you imbecile lol
The US Open semi finals are the most memorable and exciting H2H for me
I do not understand why people keep telling, Federer's prime period was between 2006 to 2011 (6 years) however Djokovic is still in his prime since 2011 (12 years and counting)...
Ehm, Sir, Djokovic is not is in prime
2011-2016 + 2018 were arguably his best years, but he's not in his prime
Prime Federer is 2004 - 2011 what fucky are you talking about
Until the end of 2010, Roger 13-6. Since 2011, Novak 21-10.
It's a fact of age of course
@@angeloclemente9447 it is, but it is not just that
@@jeresosa9744 6 years of difference are many. In 2011 Federer was already 30 years old while Djokovic was in the explosion of his career.
@@jeresosa9744 errrrrr.................IT'S JUST THAT..........by the way fed owned nole in h2h until the very end of 2015 and the first time nole took lead of h2h was in february 2016 when fed was closing to be......A 35 YEAR OLD GRANDPA............but of course u count from....2011 and on......u see before 2011 we had a weak era............how about u start counting since cinci 2015.....................u may find a score in fav o nole like......10-1 or something............WOW.............FED ONLY BEAT NOVAK...ONCE AFTER 2015...........? HE MUST BE A FRAUD NOT A REAL DEAL..................AFTER ALL ALL THE BASTARD SERBS FED HATERS CALL HIM A FRAUDERER AND A WEAK ERA KING...............BUT GUESS WHAT....ON THE OTHER HAND THEY CALL NOVAK'S ERA A STRONG ERA AND THEY INCLUDE FED AS PART OF THAT STRONG ERA.
WHEN FED WINS IT'S A WEAK ERA...........................BUT OF COURSE WHEN NOLE WINS IT'S A STRONG BEEP FUSCOVIC...ANDERSON....BERETINI.......ETC....BULLSHIT...STRONG ERA.........
RODDICK...HEWITT.......PAGDATIS.......SAFIN..........WEAK ERA
ANDERSON...BERETINI.....FUSCOVIC........STRONG ERA
.....................And yet the nole fans can't figure out WHY THE HELL their great champ is BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOED whenever he plays THE GREAT MAN..................After all the great man is a....FRAUDERER.................OR ISN'T HE ?
OR MAYBE SOME DOPO.... IS THE REAL FRAUD HERE ?
OH NAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.................WHAT IS 6 YEARS IN PROFESSIONAL TENNIS HAH ?
WHAT A JOKE INDEED SOME PEOPLE ARE..............PRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
@@flaviushonoriusemperorofro3903 your daddy GAYderer 🥵
Djokovic after winning or losing: 😀😃😄😁😆😅🤣🙃😋😌
Federer after winning: 😐
Federer after losing: 😐
At least Rog and Rafa don't smash racquets at events like the Olympics.
@@thetable5636who has 23 GS and counting?? 😂
@@thetable5636stay salty my guy, like Fed. djokovic appreciates the opponents win or lose, he smashes racquets on his own accords
@@ChicanoPhD24 now and counting. 😂
@@NamTran-xc2ipstay pressed, no one likes djocovid unless his minion lmao
One can detect some kind of a pattern, it's either easy win for one of them or a long and exhausting classic that goes almost exclusively Nole's way, barring Fed's one win at the RG 2011. It's incredible how these matches evolved into purely mental battles, where Djoko, even if not playing at his best or being for the most part of the match outplayed by Roger, eventually came on top due to relentless mental toughness, unshattered self-confidence and incredible defence. Paris classic in 2018 and Wimbledon final in 2019 are the best examples, even Djoko admitted that he had his back to the wall most of the time but was absolutely devoid of any self-doubt and utterly focused the whole time, unlike Fed, who, regardless of the match point, seemed like he did not believe that he could; hence Fed may triumph in the RR, where he can relax a bit, but crumbles in all the big finals;
That’s bc feds prime ended almost as soon as novaks prime started. So fed was destroying Novak in his prime (along with everyone else) and then he got older and Novak got into his and started destroying.
@@roberthays2883 Still doesn't change the fact that Fed had match points in some important matches and unfortunately choked. When Nole started rising in the 2nd half of Fed's prime the mental block began to develop. Fed has the skills to win, but not always the belief.
There are many ways to view the GOAT and many arguments to support one over the other. As they never really faced each other at their absolute prime it's very hard to choose. But for me personally it's Djoker, (even though Fed is probably the more naturally talented player) for two reasons: (1) Djoker has a complete enough game that he can adjust throughout a match, find an opponent's weakness, and exploit it - I don't recall anyone else being able to do this as well as him, if at all, and (2) in the most pressure filled moments, Djoker has some otherworldly ability to raise his game to another level - I've never seen anyone so good at this, I mean how many times has he been down by match points (even in his non-service games) and still managed to win?
agreed even though im a fed fanboy feds had too many chokes, and his backhands always been a liability except for 2017
Djokovic is the best bass liner without question and is the best defensive player outside clay. Federer’s game always had an element of risk to it but that makes him susceptible to errors in high pressure moments.
Well said and carefully analyzed, except that :
1) Federer is not "naturally" talented, no one is. Just have a look at his first years and you will see he was a dumber like others, he had to work had to reach his 2003 (and best said, 2004) level
2) Thsi is even more important : Djokovic has one master weapon, obviously it is his backand. Most great played have a defecting one, on the opposite Novak's one rarely fails and is even one of the best shot in tennis history. That's how he destroys all opposition. Without talking psychology (where Federer is not at all the mental sissy everyone's talking about), Djokovic is by far a most complete player. This H2H doesn't reveal it all because Djoko was still a teen when he first faced master Roger and that counts for at least 5 RF wins, Djoko gave up in a match (counting), Fed gave up before (not counting). The real score would then have been 30-20 for Djokovis at least. Still he prevails, that's the most important and the sign everything has to fall into place!
Novak is the best out of the big three but the aesthetics for me go to Federer. I stopped watching tennis after him.
6 years older and its only 23-27 shows how great and goat roger was. People claiming djokovic is dominant just have to know he was always ahead in h2h until ags caught up. For all the sounds djokovi and Serbian fans shout its only 4 matches ahead inspite being 6 years younger and fed past prime.
Biggest take away from this video- how much more gracious in defeat Djokovic is than Federer
How he'd always give a good handshake. Some might say Novak's over the top celebrations are tactless and ungracious.
Djokovics all the way....mark my word...the GOAT when they all retire.
he is already the goat... his titles are more valuable
Two great players, thanks for both for providing such a great joy for us
even as a young guy, there was so much warmth in the way ND shook hands with RF at the net. Years later, this has only got better. Love U NOLE.
Are you going to make a video about all H2H match points between Nadal and Djokovic ?
Because it's for me the greatest and closest ryvalry if tennis history 👌🏻
Thanks again for this great video dude 🤙. You really deserve much more attention 😉
Jamie Cameron Thank you very much bro 🤙 I completely agree with you it’s for me the most interesting rivalry of tennis for sure 👍 I’m actually making a video about it; this is coming very soon on the channel so stay online 😉
I 100% agree , I've seen their Match live at Us Open 2011 . Holy shit probably one of my favorite matches ever
When all players in history have played their best, Djoker is the best, to me. I wish he could do more on clay against Nadal, esp at the French, that would help his legacy a lot. Nadal is a close second, his improvement on hard court and US Open victories puts him above Federer, imo, he played amazing in those tournaments. Fed spent too much time early on playing weak players.
It will be clay after clay after clay....XDD
Nothing close. Nadal owns him on clay. Djokovic owns him on hard. Nadal 18-7 on clay and Djokovic 20-7 on hard. Yup the rallies are great tho
As a major Fed fan, I have to say djokovic is much warmer towards roger when he loses than vice versa. Maybe its roger's style? Idk but I wish roger would be warmer towards novak when he loses. It is quite clear who is more salty most of the time in defeat. Objectively speaking, I prefer novak's grace in defeat more than roger's. Just my opinion. (Though I can see some improvement in recent years)
Fun fact: Every jubilee match they played against itch other wich means 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th and 50th was won by Novak.
What are you talking about. Clarify please?
@@alfonsonapoletano4522 I don't know what part You don't understand?
@@chrisnine8487 Probably the 'itch' part i guess.
Stupid term. It doesn’t mean anything
Wow this is actually a really close rivalry. Djokovic fans had me believing that it wasn’t the way they keep going on about him. Great video bro you deserve more attention,
Jsihsbs Hsihsbz Thank you very much bro 🤙. Don’t hesitate to talk about this channel around you to make it more popular 😉
Very true I had the same impression. It's actually closer than I thought. Can't wait to see what this GOAT race will bring us when the season starts again.
Why wouldn't the rivalry be close? They're 2 of the 3 best tennis players ever.
Exactly! If anything this proves Roger is undeniably the GOAT
@@initialize21 wut ? with a losing h2h 23 27 ?
Wow, the handshakes are so much colder when Fed loses, when Nole loses he's kinda seems happy even, happy to be there. Roger looks mad annoyed whenever he loses
This video is like a forbidden fruit!
Thanks for the upload! Very well done.
Gary Miller Thanks 🙏🏻
I don’t understand those people how can they said Novak is unlikeable?
V_ walker Nole has had a really bad year as far as his reputation goes
@@MrPatrickbuit I don't think so, people who disliked him were gonna do it anyway, regardless of what he does;they will always find the way. Meanwhile his base homogenized throughout this year and they support him even stronger.
@@drago2593 Come on.. Outside of the Serbian fanbase, most of the world scoffs at Djokovic honestly. Adria tour was organised by him, then he claimed being anti vax and then he got disqualified for hitting a linesperson. Most people will have a very negative perception of him after that. He's a brilliant player, though.
I do think part of it is that he's Serbian. if hes from Germany or Britain they would go crazy over him
@@MrPatrickbuit you should really check the facts first. Adria tour-blame the serbian government, he followed the rules. He never said that he is against vaccination, listen to the interview. Default is a wrong call from US Open, a few player made the same mistake and they only got game penalty or something like that.
Why did Fed always get so cold shaking hands at the net? Like he barely seemed like he wanted to acknowledge his opponent, even when winning. You can see Novak is all smiles even when losing? Like he was just genuinely happy to be there. Fed seems like he has some chip on his shoulder
Yes
He was just more old school, and also of a different generation than Djokovic who was coming for him
This rivalry is closer than many imagine
2010 and prior (prime Fed, young Djokovic): 13-6 in favour of Roger
2011- Present (prime Novak, older Federer): 21-10 in favour of Novak
As a roger fan 2011 and 2012 was roger in his peak. 2013+ its older federer declined.
2011 was not older Federer, it was peak Federer. Federer was just 29 in 2011
@@imadariusmain7311 perhaps you could argue Fed was still decent even in his terms, but his peak was 04-07 and 2011 was the apex of djokovic
@@josephmatt8173 yes Fed was not bad at all in 2011 and 2012 but 2011 was by far Djokovic’s apex
@@tennisslams9363 I think the reason we consider 2011-12 Fed to not be "prime" is simply because he couldnt beat prime djokovic consistently. No Djokovic and those would be some of his absolute best years.
h2h way closer between them than i thought
Great video . Thx for posting! You can kind of see that up until their 11th h2h, they still had a healthy professional sportsman rivalry, after that you can slowly see Dopers progressive personality change into an angry , egotistical, chip on my shoulder unsportsmanlike barbarian !
Thank u for such a great video, i searched about video like that for long time
The thing is that both Rafa and Roger got off to what appeared to be insurmountable leads against Djokovic and he has since 2011 ran them both down, passed them both by and why they appear to be declining Djokovic seems to still be at his peak.
Yeah Novak is 34 and Federer is 39 and well on his way to retirement. Only keeps playing for Wimbledon because he’s the only guy with a shot against Novak since next gen hasn’t figured grass out yet. So makes sense Fed bullied him when he was younger and Novak has dominated (except in 2012 Wimbledon) since.
@@jackwilliam5341 roger is still capable of winning slams. He will never retire until that capability diminisues. Age is irrelevant provided his body is not broken. He doesnt have to play every event just the slams he believes he can win, which is every slam bar Roland Garros. If novak loses to Fucsovic today, roger is easily the favorite for the title lol.
@@M.L.official I don’t think you understood my comment at all. Not sure what you said had to do with anything I said. I was just stating it makes sense/logical that Novak beats Federer now and Fed used to beat Novak. However, I don’t think Fed has much left physically.
@@jackwilliam5341 i was responding to the part where you said wimbledon is the only tournament he has a shot agaisnt novak. I dont think thats true. He can definitely beat him at AO and USO.
@@M.L.official no he can’t beat him on hard courts anymore. Too fast.
27 to 23 here you go 🐐
The Head To Head - One Reason Why Djokovic Is The GOAT (And This After 6-13 Here). He Also Beat Federer In Each Of The 3 Wimbledon Finals And Won Against Him To Become The First Man Ever (And Only Until Today) To Win All "1000" Tournaments.
Thank you for the glimpse of an Amazing History i missed.
The 2019 Wimbledon final would be the biggest opportunity missed from Federer.
Yet he would never have won
Would've been his greatest victory too.
everyone hates losing to an opponent whom you have beaten more than you lose since the beginning of time, but roger gotta show tiny bit more respect when in the end of match when they do handshakes, as you may all see, Novak always congratulated Roger in a classic sportsmanship way even at a young age... on the other hand when Roger first started losing to Novak he didn't take it well at all, and didn't do the same for Novak, only till 2016 and later he realized he was truly beaten by Djoker in everyway of the game, he started showing that he wanted to congratulate him in a good sportsman kind of way...
Good effort getting footage of all these matches , must of taken sometime , respect ✊
It has the feeling that the highier the stakes are, more probably will Djokovic win.
Federer always beats him at 500 in Dubai but loses in Masters 1000 Indian Wells
In 2010 he won all matches against Djokovic except the one at the US OPEN.
Federer always beats Djokovic in round robin at the WTF, but always loses to him in the finals.
It simply ilustrates that they are very even technically but Djokovic, unlike Federer, is a high pressure player, those three Wimbledon finals and US open matches are all examples of how Djokovic is better not technically, but mentally than Federer
Good observation.
Novak leads 11-6 in Slam matches (Federer won the first two when Novak was 18 and 19), 4-1 in Slam finals, 2-0 in World Tour Finals finals, 6-3 in ATP 1000 finals.
Novak is also 4-0 against Federer in 5 set matches, 14-5 in deciding sets and 5-0 in deciding tiebreaks.
@@regulusarcturus not to mention that in three of those four 5-set matches he had matchpoints, twice on serve
Nicely noted man
Shows how Djokovic doesn’t care about a lot of matches
Taking sport to the next level, these two!
Their rivalry has always been very close, but the main difference since 2011 is mostly mentally. Federer choking a couple of times in important matches against Novak is a real indication. I'm a huge Federer fan, but that mental aspect is going to cost him dearly in the end in terms of important records.
In terms of game style and level they are both evenly matched, but in mental aspect Djokovic is light years of head over Federer!
Wimbledon 2019,French open 2011, summes it all.
@@andrewkarlsson8621 djokovich probably has the best mental strengh at the sport history. But in therms of purr tennis Fed is mile ahead everybody else!!
@@guyshuraki4315sampras better
Transformation of Federer’s attitude: salty to humility
That's right!!
arrogant > salty > fearful > hateful
Yep, I think Djokovic is the most humble of the Big 3 in terms of how he responds to the loses. He always congratulates and praises his opponent even in defeats. Federer is also very humble at losing and has made huge improvements in the way he responds to his opponents in defeat where his handshakes and hugs have become much warmer over the years. I think Nadal has always been very salty in defeat and still is to this very day. I love Nadal as a player but not as a person because he is only humble at winning but not at losing. It's obvious there is a great sense of respect between Federer and Djokovic, Federer and Nadal. Can't say the same about Nadal towards Djokovic, obviously Djokovic respects Rafa too the same way as he does Roger.
@@pacifist1360 About Nadal, I think you are mistaken! Look at his post match press conference in 2011 US Open Final. He was praising Djokovic graciously. Nadal seems salty at handshake but It's actually his inability to hide emotions that quickly. Nadal is a very humble player and person as well.
@@zebunnesa9812 I was actually thinking the same, he talks extremely graciously towards Djokovic even during the loses, especially the 2018 Wimbledon semis and 2019 AO final, but the handshakes he gives don't show his humility. I was thinking he talks highly to the press about Djokovic because he respects Djokovic but doesn't like Djokovic personally as he does Roger. It also shows by the amount of exhibition matches these guys have played. I noticed Rafa's handshakes are much warmer when he loses to Roger than they are to Novak, but that's just my opinion, obviously I can be wrong. We can't really know what the players are like as a person or what goes on behind the scenes, I just commented what I observed.
Always smiling and respectful at the net win or lose Djokovic
He is arrogant when he wins keep his tails when he loses federer emotes what he feels...most of the times he is relived with a nice smile ..somewhat arrogant when he won french in 2011..pumped after a win after 4 yrs in 2019 he look devasted after first loss in montreal..tough loss in us open 2011 and 2015...accepting his fate and missed chances in 2019 wimbledon..
Again a great video dude 👍 really good and hard work 🤙
In a nutshell, quite a close H2H. Federer clearly better during his prime before Djokovic peaked and Djokovic clearly superior after he peaked and Federer entered his 30s. Despite this, they could always beat each other (although Federer went 4 years without beating Djokovic between 2015-2019). These guys are both GOATs in my opinion along with Nadal.
Exactly correct. Finally, here's a guy (Daniel) that knows his facts and scenarios and sees/analyzes things like it should be and the way I see it, too. Everyone on here with their opinions should read your comment. All three are too close to give one of them the clear GOAT. A couple points here and there and the major totals change drastically. On different surfaces each guy could be considered GOAT. There will always be a debate. No clear GOAT. These Novak Serbian fans are way to bias and disrespectful to Nadal and Fed. There were a few major tournament matches that Novak didn't deserve to win and was outplayed by Fed and Nadal.
@@alfonsonapoletano4522 The goat debate is more and more clear after french.
Yes, they all 3 should for particular reasons should go down as GOAT even if one guy as a couple more majors than the other two. Era, injuries, surface, opponents, specific records, style, specific skills in the sport, mental, etc each guy can make an argument for. Not one guy is GOAT in the entire list above.
@@dushandvr5765 it's people like you who seem to find it really difficult to accept that there doesn't have to be only one goat
@@benparsons4979 People like me really. If Fed or Rafa were in Novak's shoes no doubt one of them would the greatest, especially fed. Fine no goats but Novak will be the most succesful player.
Great to watch this, thank you!!
Novak: The greatest success story in tennis
There are even greater success stories.
Ever heard of Federer and Nadal having 20 Slams each or...no?
no francis tiafoe story is the most success. his dad was a over night janitor at a tennis club and francis would sleep at the club while his dad worked. he used to mimick the club pros and then got free lessons. look at him now
@@calebcrawford2520 311>310
@@user-to3zc7od5i you done now? 😂
Really good video dude you deserve much more subscribers
And this ends the GOAT debate. Thank you very much
great compilation.
Age definitely took the bite out of Fed's biggest weapon against Novak: his forehand. With that weapon firing, it's already a close match. Without his forehand at 100%, Novak's got Fed's number.
Sensible comment
This is a difficult comparison, unlike Murray or Nadal, which are similar in age to Djokovic. At this point Novak has dominated Roger for several years in slams try 2012 Wimbledon. The drought recently was so huge for Roger, he practically jump 2 feet in the air after beating Novak in the Masters 2019. Plus Roger knew that loss, made sure Novak would not be number 1 at the end of the year. There's a lot of friction between them, Novak is overtaking Rogers records and he doesn't like it.
Roger doesn’t care less about records
@@strikerbowls791 wtf of course he cares about records. He wouldn't have pressured Wimbledon to strip Djokovic's points if he didn't care about records. You don't become a legend if you don't care about records
They've really had some phenomenal matches between them. I always feel it's harsh to say one of them is better than the other just using their h2h.
In Federer's prime and when Novak was young Federer dominated their head to head, but as Novak came into his prime and Federer left his Novak began to dominate.
Novak only started leading the head to head in 2015/16 when Federer was 34/35 and Novak was 27/28.
I would have loved to see them have a few matches where they were both in their prime.
2009, 2010 and 2011 US Open semis where some good examples. Great rivalry, magnificent matches.
This logic is bogus! So Federer had no problems mopping the floor with the rest of the field starting from 2011, but suddenly he can’t do the same to Djokovic and Nadal and the reason why is because he got older?! Lmao Why couldn’t he beat Nadal on slow clay like ever?! Why did he allowed Nadal to beat him in 2008 Wimbledon, which is like his backyard all whilst still considered in his prime?! Why was their 2007 final a close match, wasn’t 2007 like Federer’s 2nd best peak season?! Why did he lose AO final to Nadal in 2009?! When back at the time he was supposed to be unbeatable on hard courts, just like on grass?! It all happened in his prime! Djokovic beat Federer in the semis of AO in 2008, while Federer was still in his prime! He pushed him to the limits at the 2007 USO final (yes it was straight set defeat, but a couple of points here and there might have decided any of those tie-breaks in favour of Novak rather than Roger…), not to mention that he beat Federer in Canadian masters a couple of weeks prior! The age excuse is only brought up when talking about competition with Djokodal almost always exclusively! But nobody is ever said anything how Federer had no problems dispatching the rest of the competitive field as easily past 2010 as he was doing it prior to 2010! The competition and overall field is not limited to only two (though very tough) players in order for this to use as age excuse!…When it comes to losing to Djokovic it is suddenly an age issue, but beating all the Tsonga, Raonics, Cilices and Nishikoris of this world suddenly doesn’t count! Lol
@@Summon256 Dude use your brain a little, Nadal and Djoko are miles ahead of Tsonga, Raonic, Cilic and Nishikori and therefore when Fed started to age, he lost more because he became too slow and too old to compete with the incredibly high standard Rafa and Nole played at. However, because there was a distinct difference in level, he could still beat worse players like Tsonga.... We are not saying he only lost to RN and ND because of his age, it's just an important factor in many matches (especially grand slams because the match is longer). Furthermore, all three players are pretty much on the same level and just because Fed lost matches in his prime doesn't mean he wasn't better those years (like Nole lost to medvedev and was still easily the better player that year).
The age factor is also brough up in h2h with nole because before 2011, Fed had the advantage in matches and nole defense wasn't able to keep up with fed aggression in most matches. However, past 2011 Nole (because he got better AND fed got worse and slower) could make the rally last longer and tired fed to wins (which is shown by his slam domination against fed in finals). An argument could therefore be made that if Nole and Fed had the same age, maybe Nole would have more difficulties dragging the match and Fed aggression could allow him to avoid the mental and physical battle of 5 sets finals (like he did before 2011 ) which caused him to greatly lose to Nole past 2013.
Get it !!!!
@@Summon256 You saw the comment and began to attack the comments mate chill ! Your logic is already so lame that it's contradicting. So tell me if I ask you the same to you, why Novak couldn't beat him at the USO 2007 finals? Why he got defeated straight sets in 2009 or anyone other slam. Why Nadal lost 2007,06 wimbledon finals to Federer?
I am sure you would bring that they weren't at their prime excuse but how come they are reaching finals defeating other players and only losing to Roger ? Only when they lose to Roger you would bring out the prime excuse Lmao. You say federer fans bring up the age excuse , you are no different either.
Just gotta love them all. Anyone just looking to hate one, or pedestalize the other simply are too narrow minded to appreciate what is given.
I want thise video from long time thank you
Both had their eras and their prime years against the other.
Prime Roger (2004-2010) played Novak 19 times, winning 68% of the time. Djokovic started this period as a young top 15 player and ended as a solid world no.2/no.3 player who was a slam champion.
Prime Novak (2011-2016) played Roger 26 times, winning 65% of the matches. Roger started this generation as a solid world no.3 player and ended as a top 20 player.
Since both men have been past their prime years (2018-), Djokovic leads 4-1. However it’s important to note that they didn’t play once in 2017 where Roger would’ve won unquestionabely
You have math problems
rogers prime was actually 2004-2012 which is supported by his overal results and consistency during those years.
Don Killuminati, Nah I disagree. 2010 was the first year since RG 2004 that his semi final slam streak ended. And it happened back to back. He was still top 3 but it was deffo the first year that his peak form was deteriorating
Abror Valihanov, No my friend if you are struggling with the perfectly clear maths then I’m afraid that’s your problem. 13/19 = 68%. 17/26 = 65%
@@jimnosnow4484 yes, I just noticed I read second paragraph as prime roger👍
I love the Fed fans excuses
Would have, should have, could have.
Not as bad as the Djokovic fans excuses, "weak era", "djokovic wasn't in his prime" but say nothing about federer not being in his prime during an even weaker era.
@@mattheweberly123 true jaja
@@mattheweberly123 how is weaker? When the majority of djokovic gs and masters finals has been against rafa, roger or murray? When roger has some finals against, gonzales, baghdatis, a semi retired Agassi in 2005 and his best competitor outside clay was andy roddick and hewitt? Look how many gs roger has since 2010, magically wjen rafa and then novak entered their prime federer just won 2 slams between 2010-2016
@@diegosotomiranda4107 Federer prime ended after 2012 he wasn’t the same player
Must see tennis video, good job bro👏👏
i started watching tennis just recently 😂 some fans roger goat some nadal some novak , and the fight goes on , on all videos lol , just give it some more time and we will see whos the clear goat ,,, federer is class and talent ,, novak is the definition of hard work
Novak is also very talented
Kyrgios is arguably the most talented player on tour, that shows you that other factors in the game are more important. Besides, you can't compete at this level if you are not very talented.
Federer hates 40:15 and two match points against Djoko 😂
last 7 matches 6:1 for djokovic, big difference in years, Fedex would be still ahed if they were same years
Exactly!
Handshake in first couple of matches shows how Roger disliked Novak from the beginning
Nice job done again , congrats mate , keep on.
Thanks for your support man 🙏🏻
The only person who can stop/make them nervous/control federer and Nadal is the unbeatable goat = Novak djokovic 💯💯🥇🥇🥇
Federer is the GOAT. And I say that as a Serbian
Federed had dominated Novak when Novak was too young(Federer is 6 years older).Since Novak turned 23 he was distroying Federer.Federer age is not excuse because 2017 and 2018 he won 3 grand slams when Novak was injured.
Interstate Relocation It’s not an excuse. He is much older and relatively the fitness level drops and that’s a fact. Of course Federer won grand slams at the time because he’s still relatively much superior than most people are at his age. So when Novak was struggling, Federer did capitalise and that doesn’t mean his age is not a factor. Federer in 2003-2010 and even up till 2012 was a much different player who could stay and compete toe to toe from the baseline and obviously he has had to adapt his game to stay competitive.
Not everything is about making excuses. Roger was undeniably the dominant player when he was 23 and continued to do so till he was nearly 30. Then of course Novak took over. It’s as simple as that. I just don’t get this obsessive need of fans to establish who’s better. It honestly just reflects on your own insecurity about Novak’s accomplishments (which if you ask me is stupid because Novak clearly is the front runner in recent times).
Likewise Roger was too old to compete with players in their prime as he was declining himself by 2011. Can’t have it both ways
@@Balladhoe I can accept that. but for me, the best indicator was when they faced each other in both of their primes 2011-2012 and novak was clearly better. after that roger was no longer in his prime but still very relevant, and before that novaks wasnt there still.
Preach. SInce 2011 Federer had won 4 GS and 3 of those were during Novak's injury period.
Other than big3, is it 2010-2020 is weak era...
New generation is cmg to rival, hoping to watch... :)
Djokovic learned from Federer he was the corrector in his younger age. This video shows it. In these first matches when Nole loss he did not know about improve your shots closer to the lines without missing. Federer was so perfect that even if a rival like Nole was losing he was going to learn a lot about how to win the points.
Roger looks happy at net with Novak when he wins
Novak looks happy at net for Roger when Roger wins
Everyone in the comments: Djokovic dominates Federer after 2010.
Reality: all 3 great champions. Federer significantly older than Novak. And is incredible for nearly beating Novak at 2019 Wimbledon as a 37-38 yr ild.
He did beat him in the tour finals after Wimbledon aged 38 at that point.
Djokovic won more when both were in prime years too, look at like 2008-2014
Well, atleast Federer had 13-6. And some good 40-15 opportunities. "NOT BAD"
Then Djokovic started racking up wins against an old Federer
That's the thing about this rivalry. Is it fair that Djokovic seems to rack up victories over Federer once Federer is slightly past his prime? I say as fair as Djokovic having to take his lumps when he was before his prime. I think the thing that makes these two great is how they have been at the top of the game for so long. Both did outstanding thing pre and post prime. I mean Novak was number 3 in the world at age 20!!! Federer was a major past 35!!! Rafa was also with similar number. I guess where you place them is a matter of personal taste to point but the fact that from 2004 to 2021 these three have been so dominant is what is amazing.
@@strikerbowls791 are you crying? Well I'm not done, Novak is the 🐐 aswell
@@jesuskristersson8845 🐐 of Bronze medals 💀🙊
Federers celebrations are so cold.
Till 2016 Federer dominated the rivalry and never allowed Djokovic to lead it 22-21..also Djokovic was not even close in Federer prime time.
Wel, that's why Djoković destroyed him in his prime...😂
I love how the video quality gets better from blurred to ultra hd❤
What an Epic Rivalry this is.!!!!!!
You can notice in the beggining they were not so close. The hand shake was a little bit tense
Because of federer,federer start give some good handshake when novak start beat him and earn records,in otherhand look how novak give respect and handshake in end when beat or lose some younger and low ranked player.
Geograf its known Roger had some problems with Djokovic in the beggining because he was always retiring matches, but it wasnt only Federer, but everyone. When Djokovic started to become a champion, his attitudes changed
@@pedroalvim711 When Djokovic started doping more, his results changed
@@davd1986 When you turn teenage your stupidity change
@@VojkanTrifunovic Uuuu baš si pametan
great vid i wish you added the years
Djokovic started leading the h2h in 2015. Federer winning after that against Djokovic would've been really surprising with him being well past his prime
1:19 : "Ok,let's start "
It could've easily been equal had Federer not wasted his double match points, thrice!
It's his fault that he chokes so much
Like perfectly said Nadal "if...if...if...it doesn't exist in tennis"
Hard to believe that this rivalry is now wrapped up and completed and is now the subject for video archives! At this very same day two years ago it seemed like we are in for another 5-8 great matches between the two at very least, but fast forward two years later you have to accept, that the last match featured in this video was the last pro meeting in their respective careers! :(
Feds prime was the best for me. He was the most consistently dominant. He also managed to stay at the top despite being many years older than Novak and nadal.
What is prime ??
Was there a prime aggasi or prime lendl ??
Absolute BS
@@abeguy7981 Federer is the GOAT. And I say that as a Serbian
@@initialize21
22 and 21 are greater than 20 and I say that as a person with an iq of 140....
Even a person with an iq of 80 knows that 22 and 21 is greater than 20 ...
However if your iq is less than 80,then u r allowed to believe that 20 is bigger than 22...
Hehe
Prime Federer was at age 25 (1-6) against Nadal in hth and (2-6) against Murray. Best prime?
@@sebbeleon
Prime fed is BS....
his best years after 2010 were 2017 ....
Rest were dry mostly, shows it wasn't age but mostly jojer and Nadal that spoiled the party
After Montreal federer started to celebrate wins laying on the floor hahahaha... Mighty NOVAK DJOKOVIC started from beginning to be worse nightmare and his biggest nemesis... still after all this years NOVAK DJOKOVIC is unstoppable force and still counting
Only at USO 07 and coz he won a slam
and still counting,yes!
Whatever makes you sleep better at night.
number 1 on planet and you just can talk and talk...and watch staying number 1 for years
Can't help but notice all the graceful behavior Djokovic demonstrates in his defeats at the net. Fed seems a lot more rigid there.
People that have created the agenda against Djokovic just to protect their Fedal investment are now eating their shoes.
Djokovic GOAT, both legends!
If their H2H was a GS match, the score would be 26 46 62 76 62 in favor of Nole. My apologies to Rafa but his record is too skewed towards clay. Nole beat Roger in 4 Australian Semis, 3 Wimbledon finals, 2 US open semis and 1 US open final. That is all around impressive. I think the GS H2H is 10-6 in favor of Nole with 4 wins by Roger prior to 2011 and his last GS win vs Nole in 2012.
Roger is GOAT of all time. Djokovic improved his record against Federer after fed goes 30+ and Nadal strength in clay is well known.
No Djokovic improved his record, when he was only 18 till 25
Philippusis,Baghdatis,Gonzales,Ljubicic,Roddick,Blake,Mardy.Losers.
@@borisbalta2542 nalbandian,safin, hewitt
@@ilMario Nemoj da me zasmijavas.
Federer never beat Rafa and Novak in the same tournament.
Still so close between them and amazing how many have gone to a final set or decided by tiebreaks. I think the debate around who’s the goat is silly when either could take the match on any particular day and a single point here or there could have been the difference between who wins. Both of them along with nadal are the greatest of all time.
Finally ! Thank you !
Well said. I agree. Except that Nadal is way behind Novak/Fed on the other 3 services. Grass/Hard/indoor score: Fed 25, Novak 23, Nadal 7. In my opinion to be considered in the GOAT conversation you must be well balanced all round service player and Novak and Fed are much better than Nadal on 3 of the 4 services.
@@alfonsonapoletano4522federer won rg once, never beaten nadal there. Nadal beat federer, wom wimby 2x
@@NamTran-xc2ip Nadal only beat Federer once at Wimbledon...and Federer has a better h2h record versus Nadal on hard, grass, and indoor courts...thus Fed is better on 3 of 4 services, thus meaning Fed is a better all round player. 25 tournament all time wins for Fed versus 8 for Nadal on major tournaments not on clay. Nadal is king on clay but that's it. He is basically a one trick pony (65% of his tournament wins have ben on one surface) But, tennis is played on 4 surfaces. At least Fed played in 5 RG finals, more finals than Nadal made at Wimbledon or US Open or ATP Indoor Championship. In conclusion, If you and I played each other 5x on each surface , 20 matches in total on 4 different surfaces and I beat more times on 3 of the 4 surfaces, then I'm the better tennis player period.
@@alfonsonapoletano4522 your stats are wrong, Nadal made 5 US open final and 5 Wimbledons finals, he has 29 titles off clay. Clay is still tennis, if you take out clay, then you should take out grass as well.
22 GS, double career GS, Olympic Gold (not in clay), 10-4 in GS h2h (Nadal is 3-1 in hardcourt )
It can be all seen by their reaction after loss
The fact that Federer was always able to win by playing beautiful tennis, and by showing such a high level of class in victory as well as in defeat will make him the GOAT in everyone's hearts. No one likes bad losers, or players who celebrate winning a tennis tournament by hitting their chest, and screaming like maniacs while millions of people are being displaced all over Europe, and the world is on the brink of war
There is a tiny difference between them. Roger won mostly 500 and 1000 tournaments and Novak grandslams. What is more important?