I'm the script supervisor for season 2 of The Lincoln Lawyer. I look forward to you doing a similar reaction to our work, which is, in my humble opinion, better than season 1, which was itself excellent.
season 2 wasn't nearly as good as season 1, why are the second seasons always crap, always ending with a cliffhanger trying to get you excited for season 3 a year from now, that most likely gonna be just as bad if not worse than season 2.?
I know a jury consultant who asks her lawyer clients to watch Episode 5 from season 1. She said the jury selection process was the most accurate she's seen and that it shows how jury selection is a science, an art, and magic. That you use precedent AND gut instinct, and that no matter how well you think you did, something can always happen at the last minute to screw everything up.
My husband is a criminal Court of cassation (Supreme Court) lawyer here in Italy, VERY fond of about lawyers fiction books (Grisham, Connelly, le Carré), and we love watching crime US movies/series or about lawyers, analyzing their way of thinking and how they prepare the defensive strategy, pointing out the differencies between Italian and US judgmental system and every time he gets excited at the moment of the closing argument :D we just finished the season 1, I will definitely show him this video of yours! P.S. You should do A time to kill next!
I always enjoy watching videos of people within a profession rating the accuracy of movies, very insightful! Wish a review of my cousin Vinny would be next!
IIRC, the novel explains that Mickey’s strategy in asking those two questions of the detective before the court adjourned for the day was to have that be the _last_ thing the jurors heard before going home and ruminating over the day’s testimony; the timing prevented the prosecutor from mitigating the damage on redirect until the following morning.
I did have one question on the tactic of the defense attorney wanting to cross examine the detective before the adjornment of the court. It could be to have the last thing the jurors heard for the night was that the detective focused on the client only and was sloppy. Thus the jurors will be more "preconditioned" to the defense's interpretation of the event than the prosecutors. Is that a possibility?
It is good to get the analysis and perspective of an attorney because we know that didn't entertainment things are altered for drama. In this case, we have an attorney who actually looks like the actor and you have someone with a beard and a mustache or a five o'clock shadow and the blue suit, and he's a handsome guy. So that is some of the entertainment value of this particular program on RUclips. It gets you to pay attention more than if you were watching. Someone who didn't look anything like is attorney or the actor.
Hey guys- I am not sure if this is the right place to put his question but if not please redirect me. There are two court cases that are in your back yard and I was hoping you would shed some light on them. One is the Priscilla Presley Partners v. Priscilla Presley that is set for Friday , I believe, but would love for you guys to cover the complaints. Also there is a counter lawsuit for fraud stemming from an alleged company out of Jacksonville that is threatening to sale the Elvis Presley Graceland mansion. The attorney on record is W. Bradley Russell who may or may not be with Russell and Russell in Jacksonville OR a complete scam. There are a lot of people who don’t usually watch your channel would love to hear a real lawyer discuss these topics. If you do a live please let us know ahead of time so we can make people aware to tune in. Thank you.
@@blockmasterscott For a day or two, I think 72 hours is the max. It's basically a slap on the wrist and terrible inconvenience and hopefully a lesson to behave themselves in court.
That does happen to Mickey Haller in one of the novels, but it’s because he deliberately provokes the judge into doing it to buy time for his team to get a crucial piece of evidence (DNA from the person he’s come to believe is the real murderer of his client’s supposed victim).
Did you watch the Rittenhouse case? That did happen. They called Rittenhouse, the judge removed the jury and asked all of those question of Rittenhouse before he testified.
It’s from a Micheal Connolly book etc .. & is a fiction .. so why are you creating this - for your own pr on social media - ? to jump on the band wagon .. it’s really not to be respected ..
That's true... I have a friend he is a detective one day he came to my house. I was watching law & order then he kind of watched few min and says: oh things are not like that... I was like no? He says Not in that particular scene we handle it in a different way ... it's just an entertainment show lol. Same with the Lincoln lawyer, I enjoyed it like a show that's all
Bandwagon? He is providing an expert's opinion on what the show gets right and gets wrong. Fans love to hear from experts on lawyer shows, cop shows, any show about a specific profession, there is an audience for this type of reaction.
The California law regarding jury selection discussed here is germane to California only. Other states have their own jury selection rules, specific rules can be county by county.
I'm the script supervisor for season 2 of The Lincoln Lawyer. I look forward to you doing a similar reaction to our work, which is, in my humble opinion, better than season 1, which was itself excellent.
We're excited for season 2!
season 2 wasn't nearly as good as season 1, why are the second seasons always crap, always ending with a cliffhanger trying to get you excited for season 3 a year from now, that most likely gonna be just as bad if not worse than season 2.?
i like the actors and the acting, but the story is not up to par.
@@jonschmidt9845your opinion I enjoyed season 2 more than the 1st one.
Can you please try to release the episodes faster 😆😆😆😆 the anxiety is much
I know a jury consultant who asks her lawyer clients to watch Episode 5 from season 1. She said the jury selection process was the most accurate she's seen and that it shows how jury selection is a science, an art, and magic. That you use precedent AND gut instinct, and that no matter how well you think you did, something can always happen at the last minute to screw everything up.
that is so interesting! we always hear that jury selecting process is not easy
on guy calls it a crap shoot
My husband is a criminal Court of cassation (Supreme Court) lawyer here in Italy, VERY fond of about lawyers fiction books (Grisham, Connelly, le Carré), and we love watching crime US movies/series or about lawyers, analyzing their way of thinking and how they prepare the defensive strategy, pointing out the differencies between Italian and US judgmental system and every time he gets excited at the moment of the closing argument :D we just finished the season 1, I will definitely show him this video of yours!
P.S. You should do A time to kill next!
thank you! really appreciate your comment. we will definitely check out the movie!
I always enjoy watching videos of people within a profession rating the accuracy of movies, very insightful! Wish a review of my cousin Vinny would be next!
Thanks for your suggestion! We'll start working on that next :)
@@WestCoastTrialLawyersLA looking forward to it!!
IIRC, the novel explains that Mickey’s strategy in asking those two questions of the detective before the court adjourned for the day was to have that be the _last_ thing the jurors heard before going home and ruminating over the day’s testimony; the timing prevented the prosecutor from mitigating the damage on redirect until the following morning.
Was waiting for a lawyer to react to this💯
glad we did it! :)
I like there is no showmanship like the legal eagle does, I subscribed.
Amazing video! Keep up the good work 💯
Thank you so much!
Just came across this video. It’s great! Thank you for this!
Just binged the first series, and thought it was fairly close to correct - really glad i clicked on your video to get a proper legal review
Love this lawyer reaction video
Thank you :)
I did have one question on the tactic of the defense attorney wanting to cross examine the detective before the adjornment of the court. It could be to have the last thing the jurors heard for the night was that the detective focused on the client only and was sloppy. Thus the jurors will be more "preconditioned" to the defense's interpretation of the event than the prosecutors. Is that a possibility?
great video!
Thanks!😎
It is good to get the analysis and perspective of an attorney because we know that didn't entertainment things are altered for drama.
In this case, we have an attorney who actually looks like the actor and you have someone with a beard and a mustache or a five o'clock shadow and the blue suit, and he's a handsome guy. So that is some of the entertainment value of this particular program on RUclips. It gets you to pay attention more than if you were watching. Someone who didn't look anything like is attorney or the actor.
Hey guys- I am not sure if this is the right place to put his question but if not please redirect me. There are two court cases that are in your back yard and I was hoping you would shed some light on them. One is the Priscilla Presley Partners v. Priscilla Presley that is set for Friday , I believe, but would love for you guys to cover the complaints. Also there is a counter lawsuit for fraud stemming from an alleged company out of Jacksonville that is threatening to sale the Elvis Presley Graceland mansion. The attorney on record is W. Bradley Russell who may or may not be with Russell and Russell in Jacksonville OR a complete scam. There are a lot of people who don’t usually watch your channel would love to hear a real lawyer discuss these topics. If you do a live please let us know ahead of time so we can make people aware to tune in. Thank you.
What kind of things can happen to a defense lawyer or DA if the judge gets pissed off for some reason?
They can be held in contempt and jailed for a day or 2, or longer.
@@barrycaldwell Dang, they can actually be put in the slammer? Dayyyyyyyyyymn....
@@blockmasterscott For a day or two, I think 72 hours is the max. It's basically a slap on the wrist and terrible inconvenience and hopefully a lesson to behave themselves in court.
That does happen to Mickey Haller in one of the novels, but it’s because he deliberately provokes the judge into doing it to buy time for his team to get a crucial piece of evidence (DNA from the person he’s come to believe is the real murderer of his client’s supposed victim).
Please do a review of the movie for the Lincoln lawyer
We are getting ready to film more reactions!
Good show. Mickey Haller is the best television lawyer ever.
Yes he is!
Did you watch the Rittenhouse case? That did happen. They called Rittenhouse, the judge removed the jury and asked all of those question of Rittenhouse before he testified.
Very interesting.
Thank you!
Would you please look at a real case judge in otter creek case hale v preston.
💪💪💪
It’a a movie, dude. Go home
It’s from a Micheal Connolly book etc .. & is a fiction .. so why are you creating this - for your own pr on social media - ? to jump on the band wagon .. it’s really not to be respected ..
Bruh what
That's true... I have a friend he is a detective one day he came to my house. I was watching law & order then he kind of watched few min and says: oh things are not like that... I was like no? He says Not in that particular scene we handle it in a different way ... it's just an entertainment show lol. Same with the Lincoln lawyer, I enjoyed it like a show that's all
@@juvega2877it's just a show, like this is just a video. People enjoy watching it. you don't have to watch it.
Bruh...what?!
Bandwagon? He is providing an expert's opinion on what the show gets right and gets wrong. Fans love to hear from experts on lawyer shows, cop shows, any show about a specific profession, there is an audience for this type of reaction.
This show is crap, review the original Lincoln lawyer
The California law regarding jury selection discussed here is germane to California only. Other states have their own jury selection rules, specific rules can be county by county.