How to Choose ISO, and How Much does it Matter?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 июл 2024
  • In this week's Photography Basics video, I'll discuss my thoughts on how to choose the correct ISO in photography and how much it really matters in certain situations. Hopefully, this will be helpful to those beginning in photography.
    Videos mentioned here:
    How to Choose an Aperture Value: • What is the Best Apert...
    How to Choose Shutter Speed: • How to Choose the Corr...
    Auto ISO & Aperture Priority: • Aperture Priority and ...
    My Current Gear List:
    Fujifilm X-T3 - amzn.to/3jdBSY2
    Fujifilm X-T4 - amzn.to/33b2iEp
    XF 18mm f/1.4 - amzn.to/3B62rqq
    XF 23mm f/1.4 - amzn.to/3mYuKRG
    XF 33mm f/1.4 - amzn.to/3cKfh41
    XF 35mm f/1.4 - amzn.to/2EG2nq4
    XF 50mm f/2 - amzn.to/3jh9FzG
    XF 56mm f/1.2 - amzn.to/3jiwEKU
    XF 10-24mm f/4 - amzn.to/3cBOXrO
    XF 16-55mm f/2.8 - amzn.to/33dis06
    XF 50-140mm f/2.8 - amzn.to/2S7G1AV
    XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 - amzn.to/3rGSQmq
    Laowa 9mm f/2.8 - amzn.to/2S782Zt
    Samyang 12mm f/2 AF - amzn.to/3HVzJwH
    Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95: amzn.to/3hRGIvc
    X100V - amzn.to/3GNlPet
    X100V TCL - amzn.to/3hu9yk4
    GFX 100S - amzn.to/31bzGsW
    GF 45-100mm f/4 - amzn.to/3jdAKUi
    GF 80mm f/1.7 - amzn.to/34Um8rc
    GF 110mm f/2 - amzn.to/2GfLxig
    Haida M7 - amzn.to/3HW8vWv
    M7 CPL - amzn.to/3sKfQSP
    Haida M10 - amzn.to/3icDz6L
    Godox AD200 - amzn.to/2MdBrBo
    Godox Xpro Trigger - amzn.to/3tLj20z
    Photek Softlighter - amzn.to/391Oheg
    Godox XPro-F - amzn.to/2ThYjA5
    Westcott Orb - amzn.to/2P7RaU2
    NiSi X100 Filter Kit - amzn.to/2S7FnDv
    My Social Media:
    / dylangoldbyphotographer
    / fragments.dg
    / dylangoldbyphotographer
    My Newsletter:
    www.dylangoldby.com/newsletter/
    Timestamps
    0:00 - Introduction
    1:05 - How does ISO work?
    3:31 - Effect #1 - Noise
    6:18 - Effect #1 - Dynamic Range
    7:59 - Putting it into practice
    11:16 - Conclusion and Slideshow
    Links here are affiliate links. I'll get a small kickback (at no cost to you) if you decide to make a purchase.
    Music Used Here:
    - C4C - Skip Town
    - Provided by Lofi Records
    - Watch: • C4C - The Pursuit of S...
    - Download/Stream: fanlink.to/ThePursuitOfSimpli...

Комментарии • 29

  • @stephenreynolds6414
    @stephenreynolds6414 2 года назад +7

    I used to be concerned about keeping my iso as low as possible, and consequently ran into the problem of having a low shutter speed and the associated blur. (I was using full manual) Since switching to aperture priority, together with min/max shutter speed and auto iso, plus the exposure compensation dial the results are much more pleasing. Today's programs do a lot better job at noise removal than previously. I would much prefer to have a well exposed image, zero camera shake with some visible 'noise' than the alternative. I do not produce any work that has a critical need for 'clean' images so for me this is the best option.

    • @DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      @DylanGoldbyPhotographer  2 года назад +4

      Definitely a good system you've got worked out for your needs. Not only has software become so much better, sensors have evolved incredibly as well. Just go back and look at some of the ISO 1600 files from early full-frame cameras. It's amazing how far we've come.

  • @hurleygreen927
    @hurleygreen927 11 месяцев назад

    APPRECIATE YOUR INFO ABOUT ISO...You're taking back to basics...

  • @kiwikea2002
    @kiwikea2002 2 года назад

    I like your Basics series. Here - your discussion of DR is very welcome, especially the "Putting into practice" considerations. ISO invariance and dual channel processing may be interesting, but rather topics for advanced treatment.

  • @jamgyver
    @jamgyver Год назад +1

    Concise, easy to follow, and informative. Keep up the great work.

  • @patriziovalentino8508
    @patriziovalentino8508 2 года назад

    Thanks for the vid Dylan; much appreciated

  • @pret5097
    @pret5097 10 месяцев назад +1

    Appreciate your style of approaching tech topic from photographic point of view.
    Just a small correction regarding the ISO - the camera system does not “multiply” the amount of light reaching the sensor. The amount of light that goes through the lens is the amount of light hitting the sensor, nothing can be done adding more light.
    But what the camera system actually does in terms of the ISO is employing electronic gain to the signal coming out of the sensor. It can be applied electronically and/or by a firmware in the processor.
    As laws of physics follow, applying gain - amplified the signal, makes it stronger to in order to achieve a desirable levels of the signal lesser light can be allowed into the processing (I.e. smaller aperture or faster shutter speeds used). But of course, all in our life are trade-offs we have to make, so for higher gain we pay by allowing higher system noise (introduced as an electronic noise and/or processing “noise”).
    This is the reason of higher ISO allowing bearable handheld shooting but than higher noise shall be tolerated in the image

    • @DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      @DylanGoldbyPhotographer  10 месяцев назад +2

      This is true, but completely irrelevant within the scope of the video. This is a video for photographers who need to roughly understand what will happen to their images in order to create photographs, not a video for camera engineers who need to understand how the circuitry works. Thanks for watching!

    • @pret5097
      @pret5097 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      Exactly 😁
      I happen to be hardware engineer by education and trade, including hardware design of sensor circuits. This is why it tripped me 😁
      Anyway, appreciate your response

    • @DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      @DylanGoldbyPhotographer  10 месяцев назад +1

      @@pret5097No doubt! As a photographer, it's completely irrelevant! But, for the engineers behind, sure it is something you consider.

  • @fellowcitizen
    @fellowcitizen 2 года назад

    Thanks again!

  • @rogerzhou8987
    @rogerzhou8987 Год назад +2

    I heard a theory from someone who said: use 4 times of base ios on Fujifilm cameras to achieve the best result. This guy also said: DON'T use iso160/200. For example: for XT3 onwards, the smallest ios he suggests is 640 (800 for XT2 and other cameras with base ios of 200). As at 640, user can apply HDR400, which can be benefitial in post process.
    Personally I haven't tested this theory myself, but it is different from what I learned before: the lower ios, the better IQ.

    • @DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      @DylanGoldbyPhotographer  Год назад

      I've heard about this as well. It's likely to do with Fujifilm's dual gain processing. The gains will vary depending on the type of work you do, the scene, and how you expose. Not really the amount of depth we're going for in a simple video like this. Let's leave that sort of thing to people like Gerald Undone who love to crunch the numbers.

  • @GeoffGrant2010
    @GeoffGrant2010 Год назад

    Thanks so much! Did you cover setting the min/max iso in camera, espec. Fuji, or did I miss it? You’re good!

  • @shy-guy5544
    @shy-guy5544 Год назад

    Excellent video, as usual. Would you recommend NR -4 with an ISO value of 400 and above? Thanks

  • @jcbass46
    @jcbass46 2 года назад

    Hi Dylan. Do you ever shoot with your Fuji camera set on Auto ISO?

  • @ateliercunha2876
    @ateliercunha2876 2 года назад +2

    A side issue: I've seen you use very small F/16 apertures on the GFX. Notice that diffraction robs you of sharpness and detail at such small apertures? It's just that in Fujinom GF lenses, diffraction, which is present at all apertures of any lens, starts to be noticed right at F/8. Visibly speaking, do you notice image degradation at f/16? And so if you could, would you choose to use a wider aperture?

    • @DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      @DylanGoldbyPhotographer  2 года назад

      Not really a concern for me in most cases as I'm not poking around at 100% zoom. There's a small change from f/11-f/16, for sure, but it doesn't really bother me in everyday work. That being said, f/22 is about as far as I'll go on the GFX. Beyond that, diffraction gets a little to much for me.

    • @ateliercunha2876
      @ateliercunha2876 2 года назад

      @@DylanGoldbyPhotographer Hi Dylan, thank you so much for responding and sharing how you go about diffraction with GF lenses.
      Do you adopt the same criteria regarding non-GF lenses, but made for the GF-mount like certain Laowa, etc? The same question if you adapt Full Frame lenses.
      Or in these cases are you more conservative in the smaller apertures, to avoid diffraction? How much?
      Thank you very much for your attention.
      (sorry if this is not about ISO ,-)

    • @DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      @DylanGoldbyPhotographer  2 года назад

      I don't really adapt lenses, so that's a hard question for me. I've use a few different adapted lenses in the past, but more for experimentation than anything else.
      As for something like the Laowa, I'd apply the same logic as I would above.
      You may have noticed from my videos that while I try to apply the basics and ensure I get a quality image, the absolute image quality is not a priority for me most of the time. I'm more concerned with the content of the image than how much the details will hold up if I zoom in to 200%.

    • @ateliercunha2876
      @ateliercunha2876 2 года назад

      @@DylanGoldbyPhotographer Thank you for your opinion; It's fair. The technique only serves the purpose of the work; the theme. Not the other way around. However, it is good to know how to get the best technical advantage of the equipment. Good videos!

  • @donjjcarroll2263
    @donjjcarroll2263 2 года назад

    What's your thought on Fuji's "Auto ISO"? Do you use it sometimes?

    • @DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      @DylanGoldbyPhotographer  2 года назад

      I have a whole video on just that process linked in the description here. That should give you a good introduction on how I approach Auto ISO. Thanks for watching!

    • @donjjcarroll2263
      @donjjcarroll2263 2 года назад

      @@DylanGoldbyPhotographer Thanks for the timely reply Dylan, I will check this (Auto ISO) video out. I came across your video channel yesterday for the first time and I watched a few videos and I liked what I saw and heard. Your communication skills are great and your approached to talking about the photographs you took, why, how, etc. I certainly enjoy, I have subscribed to your channel and will look at more of your videos - I moved from a long tine Nikon shooter, starting with a Nikormat El to D750 then switched to Fuji. I currently own a Fuji X100 Limited Edition, X-T1, X-Pro2, X-T3, X-T4 and my newest the X100V. I see you have lots of videos on most of these camera.

    • @DylanGoldbyPhotographer
      @DylanGoldbyPhotographer  2 года назад

      @@donjjcarroll2263 That's pretty much been my journey over the past 8 years or so, so I hope the videos are useful to you! Hoping to be able to get out into the world and make some new work again soon!

  • @ateliercunha2876
    @ateliercunha2876 2 года назад +2

    Good thing you didn't mention the so-called "exposure triangle", because in reality it doesn't exist .-) IMHO.
    There are two real components of exposure; aperture and speed. The ISO is just Gain like that on a sound amplifier. It's artificial. The noise in the image is already there at the base ISO. Gain only amplifies it and as with sound, it can go so far as to distort it. However, this "trick" can come in handy in certain situations as you illustrated. Bye.