Fujifilm 55-200mm vs 50-140mm
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
- Hey guys! Heres a boring comparison between the Fujifilm 55-200 and the 50-140mm lol. Sage to say both of these lenses are amazing, but if you need that better build quality and extra stops of light.. the 50-140 is a must.
Fujifilm 55-200mm - amzn.to/2S88cib
Fujifilm 50-140mm - amzn.to/2WLfAWI
Instagram: @CamMacky - / cammacky
My Filming Gear
Fujifilm XT3 - amzn.to/2PQpRcE
Fujifilm 18-55mm - amzn.to/2WCU0Qv
Camera Bag - amzn.to/2D5UztI
Black ProMist Filter - amzn.to/2UzuSbj
Vari ND Filters - amzn.to/2t21Sxc
Anker Powercore - amzn.to/2Gh8ejZ
Zhiyun Gimbal - amzn.to/2qiG67b
Shoulder Rig - amzn.to/2WD22bI
Follow Focus - amzn.to/2TpAoNr
Smallrig Cage - amzn.to/2WzbMno
Matte Box - amzn.to/2sYKwRX
The 55-200 is one my favorite Fuji lenses. I think it has the best price to performance of any XF lens. The only time where I've feel like the budget option is TRULY satisfactory.
Look at the price brother alot of variation I think 55-200 is alot better
got rid of 55-200 No weather sealing and has extendable zoom. The 50-140 are all internal and keeps dust out and rain, I use mine for outdoor and out back events from Alice Springs to Halls Creek . Thanks for your content..
Do you have a website or insta account to check out your pix? I am planning to buy the 50-140 for the exact same kind of environment ...
Maaaate, those portraits are incredible! Also what a location to shoot in, a lot different to the quaint English countryside that I'm from. Bucket list location for sure. Keep up the good work
You summed it up....just like 18-55 vs 16-55 the little things matter. I’ve never gotten an unusable shot with the 16-55 even in direct sun, usually get dreamy bokeh too.. 18-55 is awesome but little details like you said. I want this one for portraits.
Thats gonna be my next one, need it mainly for video. Waiting for the Xh2 to come out first tho for stabilization
@@cammackey I'm impressed that you are using zooms for pro work. I was going to wait for the X-H2. But the X-H1 with the battery grip and extra batteries currently retails for $1299, that was too good of a deal to pass up. (And there has been no official announcement on the X-H2.) But I am waiting for the 16-80 f4, which should be released this fall.
Best lenses for portraits are the 56mm f1.2 and the 90mm f2. Either lens gives far superior portrait results and bokeh than the 50-140, with the edge going to the 56mm 1.2, imo. There are videos comparing them with sample images, just search it up.
Nice review and shots. How is the 55-200mm in terms of af speed and acuracy in indoor situations where light is not so good?
Thanks! I always enjoy your angle on things, and your shots.
I thought about the XF50-140mm, but decided to go for the XF90mmF/2 instead. There are quite a few adaptors for Fuji now, though I haven't used them, but you may wish to experiment with the Sigma ART 50-100mmF/1.8, which is apparently the sharpest APS-C zoom, and obviously very bright and creamy. Though it weighs over 3lb!
How does it perform on fuji mate?
Hi @@wooshka7731:) I've not used the ART50-100mm on Fuji, though I understand that Steelsring and Kipon have quite efficient adaptors by now (I've only adapted manual M lenses to Fuji). I'd suggest using it with the X-H series since it has the reinforced mount :)
I used to have both. But I sold my 55-200 since I've almost never used it after I got the 50-140.
PANOPSATA yeah I haven’t touched my 55-200 since lol. I do really miss the 200 compression tho :((
PANOPSATA have you used the 18-135?
Love your videos, very informative and fair comparisons....keep up the good work!
The 50-140 is my dream lens! Great video
This is a really helpful comparison. Thanks for doing it.
Scott Magoon 🙏🏽🤘🏽🤘🏽
Great review man, thank you!
I sold the 50-140 because of how loosely it attached to the body. I know all lenses can twist a bit once locked but this was enough to throw off my stitching for panos etc? I'm talking a few degrees if tilt. It happened on my Xt2 and Xt3 and no other lens does this. How does it "grip" the body once attached? I replaced it with the 55-200 and I miss everything about it. I've seen a lot of comparisons and I would be one to disagree with those saying they're equal in the center. I miss the lens alot.
Yeah the 50-140 is def sharper, by how much.. that could be argued, but def sharper!! Mine fits pretty darn snug!
Mine has no play whatsoever. You probably got a bad copy, did you try to have it replaced?
Slightly off-topic: Absolutely love your images, esp. the first one at 0:18
PlebbyPlebster thank you thank you 🙏🏽🙏🏽 i do some orettt hardcore editing using capture one, I have some presets available actually! But big part of my coloring are the fujifilm film simulations!
2:35 is that taken at 200m? Because that background is divine if it's 4.8. Way to make me wrestle with my conscience over which lens to decide over. Every kit needs a telescopic.
Awesome - I said in your previous video once I had the 50-140 I stopped using the 55-200 (except for travel). (I still have no ability though but lots of kit!!!!)
Deputy DD same same. Gonna get the teleconverter!
Deputy DD have you used the 18-135?
nice timing, was expecting a review as I saw it on the IG stories ;)
did you avoid a 135mmf2 prime and those type of lenses?
I wanna spend some more time with it first! I wouldn't mind the 90mm but I like my compression! Would be awesome if fuji would make like a smaller 150mm F2, compared to their giant 200mm
Great video thank you for sharing I have the Fuji XT3 as well and have been considering getting a zoom lens but I recently seen one of Canons new lenses which is the 28 to 70 mm f2 RF lens from what I see is sharp all around in every focal length and I love the look of it overall wish it was compatible. also I am new to Capture One And took some shots over the weekend with the Mitakon 50 mm on my Fuji and I took a shot in the daylight and it seems that I had to much light on the face of my subject I have tried to bring it down in the software but I am unable to any tips? Sorry for the long comment. Keep up the great work “cam the man”
DJ Anamaly there’s adapters you can get for canon lenses! I wish fuji would make some f1.8 zoom lenses like sigma has! And for capture one, you should be able to recover a lot of light. But if you over exposed it too much than there’s not much you can do sadly, no matter the camera or software.
It is not fair to compare between constant f2.8 lens to a variable aperture lens in such dark indoor shot without flash
that's fair because that's were the f2.8 makes the biggest difference. in a controlled lighting situation, there's little difference. it's in rough situations where you find out why one costs double the price of the other.
Thanks, mate. Saving up for this lens.
David McC666 totally worth it!
@@cammackey Tomorrow morning, mate. Can't wait to get it. Great videos, mate. Thanks.
Have you used the 18-135? How does it compare?
thx for review !
My issue is I started using blackmagic and now have a handful of amazing fuji lenses that I cant use. Im thinking it would make more sense to switch to canon at this point or just have a shitload of lenses. I should have just got one lens and actually learned portraiture instead of spending thousands to take pictures of my bulldog haha.
What software do you use to edit your Fuji photos? I just learned photoshop is horrible at processing Fuji photos. Thanks!
Photoshop is great! But for working with RAW files its best to use Capture One! I just posted a video of one of my photo edit breakdowns. Also I have other video about capture one on here!
camtheman okay awesome! Yea I noticed with my jpeg files and raw photos, there’s been a noticeable difference in clarity so I was trying g to find a good software where it’ll process the raw photos. Photoshop was just going sooooo slow
@@Marco-cm3bx Yeah I use capture one and the retouch in photoshop
I'm interested in your 55-200mm lens. What's your PayPal Price including shipping?
Which would you recommend for filming football from the sideline?
100-400mm f/4-f5.6, unless the lighting is really bad, then the 200mm f/2 with 1.4x tele (giving you a 420mm f/2.8). The 50-140 is decent (and really good for small events), but in this case I think it will have you constantly wishing you had more reach.
Nice man!
thanks bro bro
Really glad you took the plunge. Both great, but 50-140 is super nice. Having said that, you’d make a bad lens look good 😉
Hahaha thank you brutha
How much for the 55-200mm
$699
Where’d u get your hat? :)
I am waiting for 10years for the perfect camera myself the one that will take the perfect pictures for me just by hitting the shutter button 20 years for sure when Ai will be doing all the creative photography displace all photographers will be the end