Good job? Yes. Leading the pack? No. From January 24th to August 3rd, the UK has sent 4 billion dollars worth of military aid to the Ukraine. The UK is a very distant second to the US who’s actually leading the pack with 25 billion dollars worth of military aid sent. Still though, proud of both countries.
@@stashoneill I didn't say brits gave the most in dollar value, I know we in the USA have gave way more in dollar value. Boris was leading the pack as far as being first to speak out and support ukraine
Yes its a great peice of Kit but need more than 4 units off the USA and 3 Units off the UK and 3 units off Germany when they should be getting at least 60 to 80 units.Slava Ukraine.
i seen these in action during desert storm and they are loud as hell. i thought the sound of my M1A1 firing was loud until i heard these bad boys launch. amazing.
That is very nice of you Uk to send such a awesome weapon to Ukraine military is awesome for they need them very badly to defend against the evil Russia military!!!! God bless UK and Ukraine always !!!! !!!!!!! Amen !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the most important questions are: how many M270 did they get, how many missiles, what types of missiles, and how many does the UK have left in their inventory?
Putin's unstable. They are afraid of nuclear war. The world forgets The U.S., Britain, and France also have nuclear weapons. The U.S. alone could turn Russia to glass. There is no way Russia doesn't understand that if they use a nuclear weapon, mutual assured destruction will become reality.
Exactly. Germany promised the Iris-T and USA is sending NASAMS according to what I read on Reddit. They should also have Patriot and even Israel Iron Dome would be nice. I hope these countries that don't help or only help for the world to see I hope they remember this the day there at war. Iron Curtain is falling and this is cold war 2.0.
They have used them to destroy about 30 ammo dumps already.... More are coming. Russia is using T62's. Soom it will be T55's. The russians are also using rockets made in 1960. Only idiots think Russia is doing well. In a month Ukraine will have enough tech to stop the creeping behemoth. In 2 months Ukraine will have the weapons to push Russia back out of 1994 borders. Russia is fucked. But... Not if they go home and mind their own business
I heard that Norway was sending some M270s. That's great. Generous of Norway, with a short-range air-defense system, and above all, most recently, Norway sent the advanced NASAMS to Ukraine...
@@heathcliffedamokles3942 Yepp. It seems so. Apparently we are also sending some armoured patrol vehicles. Knowing UKR they will put it all to good use 👍
The whole mess has backfired for Putin. The UN is getting stronger, with new members joining. When Ukraine are admitted (after this conflict I assume) he will have nowhere to go. He can retire to his mansion and spend more time with his money.
30 ammo dumps destroyed already with only 4 of them.... Soon they will have 100. They font miss. Russia is using 1960's made missles. They miss by miles. Bots gonna bot....
With this system, you only need 1 manned control vehicle with several MLRS autonomous launchers, as in the proposed US Air Force Wingman fighter units.
Nope....You are super wrong.This is war beetween US and Russia.The only problem is that US is using ppl of Ukraine to fight and ppl of europe to suffer.
There is a cooperation between UK and Norway on the MLRS donation! Norway is donating 3 MLRS to Ukraine by shipping 3 MLRS units to UK for upgrade, and UK will ship 3 of their upgraded MLRS to Ukraine. In this way UK inventory of MLRS remains the same and Ukraine gets 3 upgraded MLRS systems. Possibly this is a pilot project to see if the Ukrainians can use the system effectively, and later supply them with more.
It seems that UKR are using them very effectivly. I think the M270 should be equipped with long lange missiles. Then the M270, that are less mobile, can stay much further behind the enemy lines and strike strategic targets in occupied territory... UKR needs to be careful. The RuZZian terrorist army is getting drones from Iran. They really want to locate all these HIMARS...
They are going to need more, fast. Take a map of Ukraine and a grade school compass (the kind with a pencil). Use the map scale to set up a 60 mile diameter circle. Draw circles near the eastern war zone. The circles are tiny on the map. Ukraine will need approximately 100 MLRS systems, support vehicles, and ammunition to make a difference. We need to start sending more now. 🇺🇦🇺🇸
@@BlatentlyFakeName US is shy about sending them as they could strike inside Ruzzia. They fear it would directly escalate the war to the point where it would more directly involve NATO, i.e boots on the ground. For now, as harsh as it is, the UKR fighting RUS means we are not directly involved. Silly as that sounds when we are directly arming them with systems, HIMARS, 777, NLAWS etc which are kicking the crap out of their 1970's army. Training troops in the UK and USA ready for combat on UKR soil seems to be a strange but acceptable medium.
@@BlatentlyFakeName I know, that is why I wrote the first line in my paragraph. It's a shame though, as taking out the Ukraine end of the Kerch bridge would severely hamper Rus in the Crimea. They would have to use the main coastal road M14 and that could be struck by regular HIMARS missiles.
The Ukrainian Army needs the HIMARS MLRS with a range of 300 km to knock out the Kerch Strait bridge connecting Russian mainland with Crimea. This is vitally important to stop Russian Federation from resupplying it forces in southern Ukrainian.
Also, it was recently announced that America will be giving A-10s as well as F-16s to Ukraine... Pilots and ground-crews will soon commence training...
@@heathcliffedamokles3942 it will help end the war quickly while depleting the Russia military. So any future wars or uprising would be difficult to stoop since the lack of troops.
Evidently Ukrainian forces were able to blast the Russians off Snake Island, which is within the range of French-supplied 155mm mobile artillery firing base-bleed (extended-range) shells from the Ukrainian coast. Evidently the Russians could not perform effective counter-battery fire. That job would normally be done by Russian forces putting their own extended-range artillery on Snake Island, but the island is small, mostly flat, and devoid of cover, with a known location of course. Shoot-and-scoot tactics wouldn't work because the only place to scoot on Snake Island is into the Black Sea. The Ukrainians in contrast could move their artillery around a much larger area on the mainland with plenty of cover, making them hard for Russians to locate and hit. Russian tactical air power mostly cannot operate effectively that far to the west of Ukraine, especially at the low altitudes necessary for hunting artillery, due to all the MANPADs the western nations flooded in. And because the Russian Navy doesn't have an aircraft carrier operational in the Black Sea, and even if they had one to bring in, Turkey won't allow warships to enter through the Bosporus. (Turkey controls the only link between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea, the only connection to the global ocean.) The Russian Black Sea Fleet had to withdraw from the Ukrainian coast after the sinking of the Moskva, so it's harder for Russian naval power to suppress the Ukrainian artillery that easily targets Snake Island.. Russian forces can still hit large static targets like apartment buildings, shopping centers, and train startions anywhere in Ukraine but they can't as easily find and destroy mobile artillery so far from large areas of Russian-controlled territory. Snake Island became too vulnerable for the Russians to hold as an outpost as Ukrainian forces became better-equipped with NATO-standard weapons and the training to use it. Now a question might be can Ukrainian forces on Snake Island hit the Russian naval base at Sevastopal, and other juicy targets in Crimea? Unfortunately for Ukraine, the same factors that made Russian forces vulnerable on Snake Island would also make a Ukrainian garrison vulnerable to Russian missile strikes from long range, since everybody knows where Snake Island is. The Ukrainians would probably have to fortify the island like the Japanese did on Iwo Jima in World War II, but it would be hard to construct tunnels and bunkers while under hostile fire, even if Ukraine had the money to spend.
1 launcher with 12 missiles with a 32km range covers 600m² with 7626 projectiles?.. Does that sound right.. The old SADF Valkerie MLRS had a kill zone of 1200m² albeit at only 22kms range..
One might hope that the hell you finally end up in has air conditioning, but the lake of fire and brimstone that foĺlows judgement day for all who do not repent of evil and supporting evil has no such luxuries. Even after 74 trillion years of screaming, the suffering will have barely begun. Get right with Jesus and get born again before it is too late.
Isn't that just murdering for the sake of murder? It is the wrong attitude completely. You need to dig yourself out of that position of hate for hate isn't going to solve the problem. Generals can be replaced pretty quickly with understudies but ammo dumps and delivery vehicles not so readily. Dying with a mind like what you were proposing would be an instant ticket to hell. The lake of fire snd brimstone afterwards is because you won't even be able to think, only scream, so God won't have to hear the thoughts of those people, there won't be any. However, the mind to want to defend the weak, the poor, the widows, etc is a different matter and just adding a little thought to how that is done can leave a little room for Jesus to help with planning that. Now that their stores are gone, the next question is, how do you make them 'waste' what they have left in a cost effective manner for their eventual surrender? The bible is full of stories of how The Lord confused the enemies of His people, even having their enemies take each other out (vs Jehosaphat) so to answer your comment (finally) righteousness in your actions goes a long way. By the way, if that is how I answered your comment, thanks for replying because my reply did seem a little 'threadbare'.
I really wannaa healp ukrain but m from India help less other country position to help ukrain like nato, uk, usa etc common lets love in action to our ukrain they realllly need waiting 4 u
Ukraine won't beat them. This will be a war of attrition and hopefully an offramp will be found but I doubt it. China's compliance with Russia is very worrying too. I fear we're headed for a hot or cold/cyber conflict very soon.
Will not touch Russias' artillery but Ukraine can use them to kill more Citizens to blame on Russia, altho that has not worked yet. There is no hope for the Ukraine military, they are Kaput!
You got half the reality. The remaining half is that the NATO wants to prolong the war as long as possible. They don't want Ukraine to quickly push Russia back. They spent time and money to pull Russia into the war. Do you want they loose their investment?
It's not clear exactly what will "beat" Russia. Each new weapon system the western partners send to Ukraine puts another increment of pressure on Russian forces. Meanwhile, western sanctions are hurting the Russian economy, which directly hurts the Russian military effort and increases domestic discontent. Putin maintains an iron grip on Russia but a tipping point must be somewhere. There is only so much sacrifice the Russian people will make for a war they didn't choose. The only thing keeping Russia in the war is its fossil fuel export business. Russia actually increased its dirty fuel profits by starting the pointless war, which panicked the oil markets and caused the price of oil to rise. If you really want to beat Russia, stop buying and burning fossil fuels. Even if your country doesn't import any Russian oil, everyone who burns oil from any source is why the price is high, thereby supporting Russia's war effort. We need to cut demand for oil, gas, and coal by enough to collapse the price and starve the Russian bear. Think about that on your next unnecessary drive or flight.
Have you seen the RT nonsense? Those idiots are actually talking about taking Poland and Germany for real. No wonder the average Russian is clueless. The crap they see on TV is just not sane.
Russia isn't going to be invading them. They don't even have enough troops to take Ukraine. Putin was stupid starting this war. They have been pushed right back to the East and are barely holding that
They really there, now? Heard about those for quite a while...but they haven't showed up yet... And the Harpoons? The brits made much of their pledge to send them to Ukraine, a long time ago...but haven't arrived yet. Denmark, however, sent Harpoons, which the Ukrainians used right away, and sank a couple of orc vessels...
Then m270 are a beast. Those will do some damage if you have the rockets for them. But it's all about using them where they need to be used. Ukraine is gonna use there artillery in a way that it should be used to achieve their goals. Like the west would use them. Russia is fixing to get set down even with there barrage of artillery.
Yes Ukraine military does need Iron Domes for real but last I heard was Ukraine were making their own type of Iron Domes so hopefully they got them made or are very close having them ready to be into this war !!! Amen !!!!!!!
Havn't been many sent so far, what 4 and are doing more damage then their old sytems. Reports are in Kherson region of satelite images of explosions and fires way behine Russian occupied territory. that HQ attack also did some damage also. If true on atleast some of the Amunitions storages being hit then will help.
The game has and is being changed. The russians are now being reduced to what is in and can be transported to the field. Once their stocks of currwnt ammunition run out it will be a cat and mouse game with the ukraines looking to pounce on weapon shipments and supply lines, so yes, game changer indeed and that is with 4-12 units so far. Lavrov's, or whatever his name is, statement that objectives are now changed is testimony to russian fears and also a bargaining chip for zelensky. Zelensky might also state that if that is to be russia's attitude (that they are going to be striking ukraine because the possess long range weapons) then they (russia) will leave ukraine no option but to use those weapons to degrade russian ability to do that by striking russian targets, since russia is now talking about declaring war on ukraine rather than simply trying to help russian people abroad. I suppose it would be amazing if the americans or british helped stranded holidaymakers in this manner on foreign soil! I suspect that a framework for agreement could follow these lines. In return for them leaving all parts of ukraine they will not be using rockets against russia as long as russia ceases all hostilities (including attacks from russian bases). Of course the matter of access to crimea for sea access should return to pre-2014 arrangements, with russia paying transit fees that are mediated by a 3rd party and similar with the oil / gas pipelines that transit to europe (or they be sold and privatised to a new independent 3rd party). I suppose that fear of the UN imposing such a deal was why war wasn't declared sooner. Russian leadership thought that their 'chess game' could lead to them obtaining all. Unfortunately, the real world is not a chess game. Real lives by the thousand have been lost in an exercise that seems more futile by the day. Even God refuses to pardon innocent blood. Putin would hate to negotiate with zelensky, with all that has been said, but he should really grow a pair, since at his age he should be understanding of young people and follow the path of wisdom and not destruction. Putin is only destroying his own country in this process of pride. One wonders who is manipulating him / them. One could also argue that lavrov's statement is also baseless as Ukraine have not attacked russian territory. The ukrainians have been consistent in defending and attempting to recover land that belongs to them. They have not relinquished their claim to crimea or eastern ukraine at any time from what I have seen.
As the hi- tech carried out in this war I don't think the DJI can still have a big roll,what I know they need T-drones of Elon musk or the more Biyracter of turkey
📜BLM approves of all launch and ordinance's as Seen on this debriefing to the United European artillertry navel and defense system as of now on that is all📜
i'm afraid russia will end up with if not all but a major part of ukraine. i pray nato is not going to go start a nuclear war with russia over ukraine.
But, where have you been hiding? Russia is the one saying they are going to nuke everyone and start a nuke war, NOT NATO. Putin rattles his nukes every chance he gets, just like a bully. Apparently he does not understand the concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD). But, do not fear, your prayers will be answered....NATO will not start a nuclear war. Not sure about Russia. Although NATO will end the nuclear war if Russia starts one. Although I'm pretty sure you will not like the final outcome....so let's just duke this out with conventional weapons.
@@jaykellett2327 where have you been hiding. russia said it would use nukes BECAUSE nato got involved and started helping ukraine. that makes it a war between russia and nato. THAT'S WW3 and nukes will have to be used if nato gets more involved. russia cannot beat nato in a conventional war. that's over 30 countries vs one. if there was a nuclear war the west has way more to lose than russia. MADD applies to both sides meaning the west would be destroyed as well. if nato stayed out of this war it would have been over a long time ago and most of the infrastructure would still be in place. usa and nato are also bullies around the world that's the way the system is. russia NEVER attacked nato.
@@johnridout6540 because they are under attack by over 30 countries. if nato had stayed out of this war it would have been over long ago and russia would not feel threatened.
@@KevinP32270 Russia is not under attack from any country. Russia has invaded Ukraine again and Ukraine is defending itself. The fighting is in Ukraine not in Russia. Russia is not fighting any NATO countries, but Ukraine is receiving military support from about 40 countries.
As much as I abhor war and the waste of human lives I came to the personal conclusion that Russia’s authoritarian regime could not be tolerated invading neighbours with impunity killing thousands of innocent civilians in the process. I have to say that I am behind Ukraine 100% and any weapons systems that will beat back the rabid bear is a welcome addition to that countries military in order to end this war as soon as possible with Ukrainian territory and sovereignty fully restored. It’s also clear to me that France and Germany are wrong in wanting to appease an insane blood thirsty dictator like Putin for they have clearly not learned the lessons of their own history. SLAVA UKRAINI!!!
@@andreoosthuizen7028 No, Russia save your young men, get the hell out of Ukraine. The time for empires is over. Russian, Chinese, American it won’t matter on a dying planet.
france and germany both don't want to upset putin. or are they using that as an excuse to not send more arms to ukraine? maybe they are sitting back and letting the rest of europe and the uk, and the us do all the giving. is it GREED?
@@rolandmujollari8508 yes all is possible when you have the help of 80% of world countries. Ukrainian sky is to Russian from start to the end. Russian S300 and S500 can't be stopped like that. The more bigger country really know how to keep the sky safe.
Already having a significant impact on Russian ammunition supplies. Russia has called a strategic pause, which is a cover phrase for "We are out of ammunition!" LOL
Good job brits, you are leading the pack they need many more but good job I'm proud of you
Me too 😊
Full respect and support from Poland!
Good job? Yes. Leading the pack? No. From January 24th to August 3rd, the UK has sent 4 billion dollars worth of military aid to the Ukraine. The UK is a very distant second to the US who’s actually leading the pack with 25 billion dollars worth of military aid sent. Still though, proud of both countries.
@@stashoneill I didn't say brits gave the most in dollar value, I know we in the USA have gave way more in dollar value. Boris was leading the pack as far as being first to speak out and support ukraine
@@garycable7659 A little more context may have cleared that up.
Yes its a great peice of Kit but need more than 4 units off the USA and 3 Units off the UK and 3 units off Germany when they should be getting at least 60 to 80 units.Slava Ukraine.
U.S. has now sent 8 units (HIMARS) and 4 more scheduled for August in a few weeks, so 12 at least this summer. UPDATE: Total is now at 16 delivered.
Made a big deal about sending NASAMS ..sent 1 .. with talk about sending more.
what are the german units ? can u tell me ?
@@gbactasa panzer 2000 155mm
@@richierich1470 they also send the MARS II (MLRS) besides the Panzerhaubitze 2000
i seen these in action during desert storm and they are loud as hell. i thought the sound of my M1A1 firing was loud until i heard these bad boys launch. amazing.
From England 🇬🇧 with love and hugs slava to Ukraine 🇺🇦
That is very nice of you Uk to send such a awesome weapon to Ukraine military is awesome for they need them very badly to defend against the evil Russia military!!!! God bless UK and Ukraine always !!!! !!!!!!! Amen !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great that the UK is helping Ukraine - thanks Boris.
Ukraine needs more long range artillery weapons capable to fight Putin's unslaught.
Full respect and support from Poland!
ALL APPROVED; TARGET MOSCOW! NO MERCY!; 🦊
the most important questions are: how many M270 did they get, how many missiles, what types of missiles, and how many does the UK have left in their inventory?
As the situation is the maker or the producer is not like the buyer let me think there is a big strategy against these invaders
USA 4 UNITS UK 3 UNITS Germany 3 units Ukraine needs 60 to 80 Units.
@mark cahill Mark there was about 80 units used in iraq war
@@richierich1470 Wrong USA never sent any M270 they only supplied the smaller HIMARS M113A.
Ukraine needs high-tech air defense system as well, i think everybody knows that, so why is there ain't any?
Putin's unstable. They are afraid of nuclear war. The world forgets The U.S., Britain, and France also have nuclear weapons. The U.S. alone could turn Russia to glass.
There is no way Russia doesn't understand that if they use a nuclear weapon, mutual assured destruction will become reality.
Because Ukrainian supporter countries (so called supporters) want to prolong the war. They don't want to finish it.
Israel blocked the US from shipping Patriots at the beginning of the war ..didn't want to upset Israels relationship with putin ...
They’re not part of NATO
Exactly. Germany promised the Iris-T and USA is sending NASAMS according to what I read on Reddit.
They should also have Patriot and even Israel Iron Dome would be nice. I hope these countries that don't help or only help for the world to see I hope they remember this the day there at war. Iron Curtain is falling and this is cold war 2.0.
Britain is sending MR270 rocket systems, we ain't differing about! 🇬🇧🇺🇦✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️
A Norwegian/UK collaboration 👍 Love it!
greetings from Poland
More to Ukraine, Ukraine is showing us all how to fight Invaders, Russians, valuable lessons that will lead to keeping the peace worldwide.
@@happymonkey7068 Right, Russians Losing
We should send at least 100 of these units to Ukraine.
Really
The US only owns 9
@@riclindsey329 Oh. I thought we had about 400 or so.
The amount of rockets is more important than the number of launchers. If you have 100 launchers and no missiles.....what good is that?
They have used them to destroy about 30 ammo dumps already....
More are coming.
Russia is using T62's.
Soom it will be T55's.
The russians are also using rockets made in 1960.
Only idiots think Russia is doing well.
In a month Ukraine will have enough tech to stop the creeping behemoth.
In 2 months Ukraine will have the weapons to push Russia back out of 1994 borders.
Russia is fucked.
But...
Not if they go home and mind their own business
Great video!!! Norway is sending some M270 also, but they need to be upgraded in the UK first...
I heard that Norway was sending some M270s. That's great. Generous of Norway, with a short-range air-defense system, and above all, most recently, Norway sent the advanced NASAMS to Ukraine...
@@heathcliffedamokles3942 Yepp. It seems so. Apparently we are also sending some armoured patrol vehicles. Knowing UKR they will put it all to good use 👍
@@HrPedrosak That's great! Recently Ukraine asked for that very thing, specifically.
'Godt gjort, Norge'
(Google translate)
@@heathcliffedamokles3942 🙂Slava Ukraini!
@@HrPedrosak Damn straight...
Russia should just go home already.
Dead or alive?
Parabéns Reino Unido amigo da Ucrânia. Glória Reino Unido e Ucrânia livre sempre 🙏🙌✋🙏
Brittania rules the waves in many ways.
The whole mess has backfired for Putin.
The UN is getting stronger, with new members joining.
When Ukraine are admitted (after this conflict I assume) he will have nowhere to go.
He can retire to his mansion and spend more time with his money.
Yeah great, UK send 4 and Murica 4. That's a real help for Ukraine.
30 ammo dumps destroyed already with only 4 of them....
Soon they will have 100.
They font miss.
Russia is using 1960's made missles.
They miss by miles.
Bots gonna bot....
@@VajrahahaShunyata I hope you're right.
I hope Ukraine will winn the war soon. I pray for them.
No idea how good it is, but it looks awesome.
Beautiful video
I agree that the Ukrainian Armed Forces need somewhere between 60 and 80 such units.
Slava Ukraine
With this system, you only need 1 manned control vehicle with several MLRS autonomous launchers, as in the proposed US Air Force Wingman fighter units.
This is the war of Vladimir Putin's ego.
Nope....You are super wrong.This is war beetween US and Russia.The only problem is that US is using ppl of Ukraine to fight and ppl of europe to suffer.
Correct
There is a cooperation between UK and Norway on the MLRS donation! Norway is donating 3 MLRS to Ukraine by shipping 3 MLRS units to UK for upgrade, and UK will ship 3 of their upgraded MLRS to Ukraine. In this way UK inventory of MLRS remains the same and Ukraine gets 3 upgraded MLRS systems. Possibly this is a pilot project to see if the Ukrainians can use the system effectively, and later supply them with more.
It seems that UKR are using them very effectivly. I think the M270 should be equipped with long lange missiles. Then the M270, that are less mobile, can stay much further behind the enemy lines and strike strategic targets in occupied territory... UKR needs to be careful. The RuZZian terrorist army is getting drones from Iran. They really want to locate all these HIMARS...
The BRIDGE, what about the BRIDGE? It could sure use more attention...
They are going to need more, fast.
Take a map of Ukraine and a grade school compass (the kind with a pencil).
Use the map scale to set up a 60 mile diameter circle.
Draw circles near the eastern war zone. The circles are tiny on the map.
Ukraine will need approximately 100 MLRS systems, support vehicles, and ammunition to make a difference.
We need to start sending more now.
🇺🇦🇺🇸
Thanks all volunteers and helpers you deserve a better results let us see.
These can load rockets which have a 300km range I think.
@@BlatentlyFakeName US is shy about sending them as they could strike inside Ruzzia. They fear it would directly escalate the war to the point where it would more directly involve NATO, i.e boots on the ground. For now, as harsh as it is, the UKR fighting RUS means we are not directly involved. Silly as that sounds when we are directly arming them with systems, HIMARS, 777, NLAWS etc which are kicking the crap out of their 1970's army. Training troops in the UK and USA ready for combat on UKR soil seems to be a strange but acceptable medium.
@@michaelsmith7425 Only one of the missile types can go that far and they aren't getting them.
@@BlatentlyFakeName I know, that is why I wrote the first line in my paragraph. It's a shame though, as taking out the Ukraine end of the Kerch bridge would severely hamper Rus in the Crimea. They would have to use the main coastal road M14 and that could be struck by regular HIMARS missiles.
The Ukrainian Army needs the HIMARS MLRS with a range of 300 km to knock out the Kerch Strait bridge connecting Russian mainland with Crimea. This is vitally important to stop Russian Federation from resupplying it forces in southern Ukrainian.
They need more
What do you mean 'Finally'? It's not like these are off the shelf at Guns r Us, ya know.
Ya think?
WELL SAID!
I don't think Great Britain was using that flag when it was helping develop the missile launchers.
Yeah .. whats with the British flag ... was Nicola Sturgeon lurking nearby ...
Reach to the Katyusha
*Shows example with Polish emblem*
me: *feels good man*
Jet fighters and tanks would be helpful as well?
Also, it was recently announced that America will be giving A-10s as well as F-16s to Ukraine...
Pilots and ground-crews will soon commence training...
@@heathcliffedamokles3942 it will help end the war quickly while depleting the Russia military. So any future wars or uprising would be difficult to stoop since the lack of troops.
Can these reach Snake Island????
Yes, but they also have Cesar artillery that seems to have done the job much more cost effectively.
Evidently Ukrainian forces were able to blast the Russians off Snake Island, which is within the range of French-supplied 155mm mobile artillery firing base-bleed (extended-range) shells from the Ukrainian coast. Evidently the Russians could not perform effective counter-battery fire. That job would normally be done by Russian forces putting their own extended-range artillery on Snake Island, but the island is small, mostly flat, and devoid of cover, with a known location of course. Shoot-and-scoot tactics wouldn't work because the only place to scoot on Snake Island is into the Black Sea. The Ukrainians in contrast could move their artillery around a much larger area on the mainland with plenty of cover, making them hard for Russians to locate and hit. Russian tactical air power mostly cannot operate effectively that far to the west of Ukraine, especially at the low altitudes necessary for hunting artillery, due to all the MANPADs the western nations flooded in. And because the Russian Navy doesn't have an aircraft carrier operational in the Black Sea, and even if they had one to bring in, Turkey won't allow warships to enter through the Bosporus. (Turkey controls the only link between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea, the only connection to the global ocean.) The Russian Black Sea Fleet had to withdraw from the Ukrainian coast after the sinking of the Moskva, so it's harder for Russian naval power to suppress the Ukrainian artillery that easily targets Snake Island.. Russian forces can still hit large static targets like apartment buildings, shopping centers, and train startions anywhere in Ukraine but they can't as easily find and destroy mobile artillery so far from large areas of Russian-controlled territory. Snake Island became too vulnerable for the Russians to hold as an outpost as Ukrainian forces became better-equipped with NATO-standard weapons and the training to use it.
Now a question might be can Ukrainian forces on Snake Island hit the Russian naval base at Sevastopal, and other juicy targets in Crimea? Unfortunately for Ukraine, the same factors that made Russian forces vulnerable on Snake Island would also make a Ukrainian garrison vulnerable to Russian missile strikes from long range, since everybody knows where Snake Island is. The Ukrainians would probably have to fortify the island like the Japanese did on Iwo Jima in World War II, but it would be hard to construct tunnels and bunkers while under hostile fire, even if Ukraine had the money to spend.
155 mm 777s can and do reach Snake Island. We want that big long bridge connencting Russia to Crimea.
@@donaldclifford5763 the US has the missiles to take out that bridge, but washington refuses to send them to ukraine.
@@jerrymclamb82 Denys just came out with a new video announcing the approval for the missiles. Help is coming.
All cluster munitions rockets were removed from US Army inventories in 2007 and replaced with the 200 pound unitary explosive warheads.
donate all the retired EA-6B Prowler to Ukraine that would be a true game changer
1:32 The T-34 colipia looks a SHERMAN TO ME!
1 launcher with 12 missiles with a 32km range covers 600m² with 7626 projectiles?.. Does that sound right.. The old SADF Valkerie MLRS had a kill zone of 1200m² albeit at only 22kms range..
I hope the Ukrainian defenders drop every one of the new MLRS they have been given into a Russian generals lap.
One might hope that the hell you finally end up in has air conditioning, but the lake of fire and brimstone that foĺlows judgement day for all who do not repent of evil and supporting evil has no such luxuries. Even after 74 trillion years of screaming, the suffering will have barely begun. Get right with Jesus and get born again before it is too late.
@@nooboftheyear7170 Supporting evil? How is defending against an unprovoked invasion evil? Self righteous preaching isn’t a good thing my friend!
Isn't that just murdering for the sake of murder? It is the wrong attitude completely. You need to dig yourself out of that position of hate for hate isn't going to solve the problem.
Generals can be replaced pretty quickly with understudies but ammo dumps and delivery vehicles not so readily.
Dying with a mind like what you were proposing would be an instant ticket to hell. The lake of fire snd brimstone afterwards is because you won't even be able to think, only scream, so God won't have to hear the thoughts of those people, there won't be any.
However, the mind to want to defend the weak, the poor, the widows, etc is a different matter and just adding a little thought to how that is done can leave a little room for Jesus to help with planning that.
Now that their stores are gone, the next question is, how do you make them 'waste' what they have left in a cost effective manner for their eventual surrender? The bible is full of stories of how The Lord confused the enemies of His people, even having their enemies take each other out (vs Jehosaphat) so to answer your comment (finally) righteousness in your actions goes a long way.
By the way, if that is how I answered your comment, thanks for replying because my reply did seem a little 'threadbare'.
The MLRS systems plus ammo is not happening fast enough, period!!
I really wannaa healp ukrain but m from India help less other country position to help ukrain like nato, uk, usa etc common lets love in action to our ukrain they realllly need waiting 4 u
Get your country to stop buying Russian oil and gas.
Yes Ukraine will win !!!
The Russians will adapt. To have an impact, Ukraine needs at least 10 x of everything.
Слава Украине!!
Oh yes this maybe will Make someone to servive from the deadly intruders
Sending the Ukraine short range weapons will hurt Russia but won’t beat them.
Ukraine won't beat them. This will be a war of attrition and hopefully an offramp will be found but I doubt it. China's compliance with Russia is very worrying too. I fear we're headed for a hot or cold/cyber conflict very soon.
Will not touch Russias' artillery but Ukraine can use them to kill more Citizens to blame on Russia, altho that has not worked yet. There is no hope for the Ukraine military, they are Kaput!
You got half the reality. The remaining half is that the NATO wants to prolong the war as long as possible. They don't want Ukraine to quickly push Russia back. They spent time and money to pull Russia into the war. Do you want they loose their investment?
Ok anyway but someone can get were to drink water and 1 better than 0
It's not clear exactly what will "beat" Russia. Each new weapon system the western partners send to Ukraine puts another increment of pressure on Russian forces. Meanwhile, western sanctions are hurting the Russian economy, which directly hurts the Russian military effort and increases domestic discontent. Putin maintains an iron grip on Russia but a tipping point must be somewhere. There is only so much sacrifice the Russian people will make for a war they didn't choose.
The only thing keeping Russia in the war is its fossil fuel export business. Russia actually increased its dirty fuel profits by starting the pointless war, which panicked the oil markets and caused the price of oil to rise. If you really want to beat Russia, stop buying and burning fossil fuels. Even if your country doesn't import any Russian oil, everyone who burns oil from any source is why the price is high, thereby supporting Russia's war effort. We need to cut demand for oil, gas, and coal by enough to collapse the price and starve the Russian bear. Think about that on your next unnecessary drive or flight.
THat was intense.
These will stop about 8th November when their main support is cancelled!
Lots of info. on MLRS
NATO has to send more heavy weapons to Ukranians now, unless they want to loose Polaks and Germans defending Warsaw and Berlin
Have you seen the RT nonsense? Those idiots are actually talking about taking Poland and Germany for real.
No wonder the average Russian is clueless. The crap they see on TV is just not sane.
Is Nato at war with Russia now?
@@marksimpson4215 not yet and hope will never be, with our help Ukranians are saving lives of our soldiers
Russia isn't going to be invading them. They don't even have enough troops to take Ukraine. Putin was stupid starting this war. They have been pushed right back to the East and are barely holding that
Your wright this was not a good turn to do this, negotiations and other solutions can work also everyone to know the ambitions of each other.
Got the UK union flag wrong: the figute lacks the red diagonals representing Northen Ireland. It is actuall. The British flag pre-1707.
Thats how it will be soon. United Ireland
sloppy made video
0:55 this is invented in China, not in Korea I think.
Why is there a Sherman in the pic that is called a t-,34?
T34 Calliope.. the tank is a sherman
They really there, now? Heard about those for quite a while...but they haven't showed up yet...
And the Harpoons? The brits made much of their pledge to send them to Ukraine, a long time ago...but haven't arrived yet.
Denmark, however, sent Harpoons, which the Ukrainians used right away, and sank a couple of orc vessels...
It's generally thought that Harpoons sank the Moscva.
Who chose them the best ?
Wow another British inversion.
Send them to Ukraine, and see what happens ...
Then m270 are a beast. Those will do some damage if you have the rockets for them. But it's all about using them where they need to be used. Ukraine is gonna use there artillery in a way that it should be used to achieve their goals. Like the west would use them. Russia is fixing to get set down even with there barrage of artillery.
Like targeting Russian ammunition storage areas???? I suspect greater military minds than ours are working on the tactics right now.
Flag shown for Get Britain why are you using 1707 flag that was superseded by 1801 union flag
Yes Ukraine military does need Iron Domes for real but last I heard was Ukraine were making their own type of Iron Domes so hopefully they got them made or are very close having them ready to be into this war !!! Amen !!!!!!!
Against the Russian system of Iskander ?
Probably shoot down 90% of them. How many does Russia have?
Militech :) cyberpunk 2077 :) lol
I see the Russians are still in a panic 🤣🤣🤣
They have to.
they have many, entering UKR exist no one.
Should develop the M270 Mlrs misssles to go mach 10 make it faster this thing look real cool to be in gta 5 lol
❤️❤️❤️✌️👍
The fact is none of the high tech weapons sent to Ukraine have been a so called game changer.
Havn't been many sent so far, what 4 and are doing more damage then their old sytems.
Reports are in Kherson region of satelite images of explosions and fires way behine Russian occupied territory. that HQ attack also did some damage also.
If true on atleast some of the Amunitions storages being hit then will help.
@@andreoosthuizen7028 Barely, but yes.
They were not used yet. So far only test for upcommig contra offensives were it will be used on much larger scale.
The game has and is being changed. The russians are now being reduced to what is in and can be transported to the field. Once their stocks of currwnt ammunition run out it will be a cat and mouse game with the ukraines looking to pounce on weapon shipments and supply lines, so yes, game changer indeed and that is with 4-12 units so far.
Lavrov's, or whatever his name is, statement that objectives are now changed is testimony to russian fears and also a bargaining chip for zelensky.
Zelensky might also state that if that is to be russia's attitude (that they are going to be striking ukraine because the possess long range weapons) then they (russia) will leave ukraine no option but to use those weapons to degrade russian ability to do that by striking russian targets, since russia is now talking about declaring war on ukraine rather than simply trying to help russian people abroad.
I suppose it would be amazing if the americans or british helped stranded holidaymakers in this manner on foreign soil!
I suspect that a framework for agreement could follow these lines. In return for them leaving all parts of ukraine they will not be using rockets against russia as long as russia ceases all hostilities (including attacks from russian bases).
Of course the matter of access to crimea for sea access should return to pre-2014 arrangements, with russia paying transit fees that are mediated by a 3rd party and similar with the oil / gas pipelines that transit to europe (or they be sold and privatised to a new independent 3rd party).
I suppose that fear of the UN imposing such a deal was why war wasn't declared sooner. Russian leadership thought that their 'chess game' could lead to them obtaining all.
Unfortunately, the real world is not a chess game. Real lives by the thousand have been lost in an exercise that seems more futile by the day. Even God refuses to pardon innocent blood.
Putin would hate to negotiate with zelensky, with all that has been said, but he should really grow a pair, since at his age he should be understanding of young people and follow the path of wisdom and not destruction. Putin is only destroying his own country in this process of pride. One wonders who is manipulating him / them.
One could also argue that lavrov's statement is also baseless as Ukraine have not attacked russian territory. The ukrainians have been consistent in defending and attempting to recover land that belongs to them. They have not relinquished their claim to crimea or eastern ukraine at any time from what I have seen.
sent them 3.......they want and need 300.....
Where doers that number come from? How many do the US use in Iraqi Freedom?
Can we send some DJI drones!!!
As the hi- tech carried out in this war I don't think the DJI can still have a big roll,what I know they need T-drones of Elon musk or the more Biyracter of turkey
Too late.
📜BLM approves of all launch and ordinance's as Seen on this debriefing to the United European artillertry navel and defense system as of now on that is all📜
We are not support zelensky. most go from USA 🇺🇸
The soviet Katyusha got the name Stalinorgel from the Germans, not the German Werfer. Sloppy video😐
1:30
Can I get a GSRS for the 4th of July!
Russia panic??? 😂😂😂😂
No
They die.
"Russia Panic" hahahahaha has Russia surrendered yet? Game-changer lol
100 of them would make a difference 7 do not 🤔
Seven make a difference. A few dozen, a game changer. 100 plus, Russia surrenders.
Since when Russia panic?🤣🤣🤣
During every fire fight with soldiers...
They are brave when killing civilians
@@VajrahahaShunyata what? Do you think people believe what mainstream media says?
@@justindwayneplenos9537 Better to believe unbiased Russian media.
i'm afraid russia will end up with if not all but a major part of ukraine. i pray nato is not going to go start a nuclear war with russia over ukraine.
But, where have you been hiding? Russia is the one saying they are going to nuke everyone and start a nuke war, NOT NATO. Putin rattles his nukes every chance he gets, just like a bully.
Apparently he does not understand the concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD).
But, do not fear, your prayers will be answered....NATO will not start a nuclear war. Not sure about Russia. Although NATO will end the nuclear war if Russia starts one. Although I'm pretty sure you will not like the final outcome....so let's just duke this out with conventional weapons.
@@jaykellett2327 where have you been hiding. russia said it would use nukes BECAUSE nato got involved and started helping ukraine. that makes it a war between russia and nato. THAT'S WW3 and nukes will have to be used if nato gets more involved. russia cannot beat nato in a conventional war. that's over 30 countries vs one. if there was a nuclear war the west has way more to lose than russia. MADD applies to both sides meaning the west would be destroyed as well. if nato stayed out of this war it would have been over a long time ago and most of the infrastructure would still be in place. usa and nato are also bullies around the world that's the way the system is. russia NEVER attacked nato.
Only Russia has threatened to start a nuclear war.
@@johnridout6540 because they are under attack by over 30 countries. if nato had stayed out of this war it would have been over long ago and russia would not feel threatened.
@@KevinP32270 Russia is not under attack from any country. Russia has invaded Ukraine again and Ukraine is defending itself. The fighting is in Ukraine not in Russia. Russia is not fighting any NATO countries, but Ukraine is receiving military support from about 40 countries.
As much as I abhor war and the waste of human lives I came to the personal conclusion that Russia’s authoritarian regime could not be tolerated invading neighbours with impunity killing thousands of innocent civilians in the process. I have to say that I am behind Ukraine 100% and any weapons systems that will beat back the rabid bear is a welcome addition to that countries military in order to end this war as soon as possible with Ukrainian territory and sovereignty fully restored. It’s also clear to me that France and Germany are wrong in wanting to appease an insane blood thirsty dictator like Putin for they have clearly not learned the lessons of their own history.
SLAVA UKRAINI!!!
@@andreoosthuizen7028 No, Russia save your young men, get the hell out of Ukraine. The time for empires is over. Russian, Chinese, American it won’t matter on a dying planet.
france and germany both don't want to upset putin. or are they using that as an excuse to not send more arms to ukraine? maybe they are sitting back and letting the rest of europe and the uk, and the us do all the giving. is it GREED?
@@jerrymclamb82 no i think it’s shrunken nuts.
no
Russia panic ??? 😂🤣 So good to listen a stupid thing like that 🤣😂
Well maybe they won’t but on their first strike they took out a Russian command post 65+ km from the front line. Enjoy that.
@@rolandmujollari8508 yes all is possible when you have the help of 80% of world countries. Ukrainian sky is to Russian from start to the end. Russian S300 and S500 can't be stopped like that. The more bigger country really know how to keep the sky safe.
Sky and country protected
this has zero impact on the full scale of combat
Already having a significant impact on Russian ammunition supplies. Russia has called a strategic pause, which is a cover phrase for "We are out of ammunition!" LOL
Question for NATO degenerates (Germany and France): How many of these systems have you already delivered to Ukraine?
LIE
Out of the Subject, talk to much is useless.
Panic Russian soldiers captured lyscychnsk and brave Ukrainian soldiers ran away ,
At what cost in Russian soldiers lives? Oh, sorry....just cannon fodder.