FURY (2014) Movie Reaction [First time watching]
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2021
- We have been watching war film dramas lately and this movie, FURY, is special because it gives us a different point of view... this movie focused mainly on the US tank crews that fought during WW2.
NOTE: we blurred some scenes that aren't appropriate for all audiences.. and please be kind in the comments since the movie includes some sensitive events!
#fury #moviereaction
if you are interested to see the full-length/unedited videos of our reactions:
👉 / mjoy4fun
-----------------------------------------
➡ MJoy4Fun are an interracial couple from Romania and Philippines. We mainly post reactions and vlogs on our channel! if you enjoyed this video, leave us a comment below! 😊
-----------------------------------------
Enjoyed this video? check our PLAYLISTS!!!
GOD OF WAR SAGA: • Playlist
League of Legends: • Playlist
Overwatch Animated Shorts: • Playlist
World of Warcraft: • Playlist
Tales of Runeterra: • Playlist
Diablo: • Playlist
Assassin's Creed: • Playlist
Apex Legends: • Playlist
Overwatch Origin Stories: • Playlist
Follow us on:
Facebook: mjoy4fun 
Развлечения
![[First Time Watching] The Pianist (2002) Movie Reaction](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xmKc5qLdr4E/mqdefault.jpg)
![[First Time Watching] The Pianist (2002) Movie Reaction](/img/tr.png)
![Sean Rii, Karyon, Sharzkii - Taungule [My Love] (Official Visualizer)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eJoMuypbSzQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I remember back when this movie came out and at the time the marines still had tanks. I was in a tank unit myself and all I remember everyone saying was “best job I ever had” I miss tanks glad I left when we still had them.
It was the best job I ever had. I was Army - 19K.
I'm in the marines 0311 infantry and had to unfortunately see the retirement of tanks for useful combat. Such great creatures to roam this Earth. Thank you and @ ED p. for your service in terms of tanks.
@@edp.8541 ^
13B - Cannon CrewMember - on my second deoyment even we said it after fire missions haha
Marines don't have tanks anymore? Didn't know that
The reason why Wardaddy (Brad Pitt) got furious at his crew at the table was because they deliberately brought out what is implied his worst War memory. It’s subtlety hinted throughout the movie that Wardaddy is fond of horses. The story that they spent three days putting suffering horses out of their misery took a toll on him and him slamming the pistol on the table to get them to shut up indicates that he was the one who had to do it.
He had to shoot his favorite animals to keep them from suffering. That certainly would do something to someone.
Damn I missed that...that's pretty dark ngl. Also kinda shows how the crew don't really know who their crew mates were before the war
Yeah it almost be like killing your pet and then someone jokes about it
There are some deleted scenes that Don (Wardaddy) had a brother and sister who were killed in a drunk driving acident caused by Don. The burn scar on his back was caused by a fire in that accident, which is why Don no longer drank. You find out that Don's younger brother's name was Norman.
If you get a chance, rewatch where Norman and Don first mean and Don asks him his name, look at Don's face when he hears the name Norman.
The tank crew didn't understand why Don was treating Norman so well with a dinner and helping him get laid and why they excluded them from the dinner. The Tank brothers who had been through hell together for the last three years. And this new kid was being treated so well by their leader.
Bringing up a bad memory of killing horses was their way of punishing him for his kindness to Norman.
The SS officer with the broken arm was the one who had the kids hung. That's why he got waxed.
A little list of my favorite War movies :
-About WW1 :
“Path of Glory “ (by Stanley Kubrick 1954)
“La Grande Illusion “ (by Jean Renoir from 1937)
“All Quiet on the Western Front” (Lewis Milestone from 1930)
“Westfront 1918”(german movie, 1930)
« Lawrence of Arabia » (british movie 1962)
-About WW2 :
“Das Boot” (1981 german movie)
“Come and See” (1985 belarus movie, the best of best)
“Stalingrad” (1993 german movie)
“Land of Mine” (2015 danish movie)
Great list, would like to suggest you watch "The Bridge"from 1959, directed by Bernhard Wicki.
@@isabelsilva62023 agree!
1- fury.
END.
gordo engendro
tora tora tora, a bridge too far, downfall
Waffen SS were known to execute Allied soldiers who were captured or surrendered.
Once the Allied soldiers knew about this SS soldiers were killed where ever they were found. Even if the surrendered. One of the worst atrocities came from the capture of Battery B 285th Field Artillery Observation Battalion.
The Americans were not, it should be emphasized, front line troops who had fought stubbornly and then thrown up their hands at the last moment.
SS machine gunners opened fire and massacred 84 Americans.
SS men walked among the wounded, shooting some of them in the head; and they also murdered a Belgian widow who owned a local café.
this is just untrue, some war atrocities were committed by American troops on German soldiers and SS and covered by the general staff. But of course it doesn’t fit with the naive Biblical narrative of the “Good” side vs “Evil” side.
@@pianoman1857 no side was good
The discovery of Concentration camps further fueled that “No Mercy” conduct of soldiers towards the SS. Many primary sources would indicate that very few SS who were captured were spared of a beating. One quoted in his memoir, “If we wouldn’t kill them, we would bruise them.” It’s safe to say, it was the worst time to be in the SS. Slim chances of being spared and even slimmer of being unharmed.
@@pianoman1857 Malmedy did happen. Nothing in his comment indicated that there weren’t any harsh retaliations from the Allies. The reputation of the SS and the discovery of what they did to civilians throughout WWII fueled these unofficial acts against prisoners of war. No one here is justifying what the Allies did to them, just simply providing an understanding as to why Americans, British, and French soldiers did this to whoever they captured from the SS at the late stages of the war.
If your life goes really bad, you might end up at a point where you have to decide to do the right thing even when it means you die and it doesn't make a difference. A good man still does the right thing, but it's not that easy. The Waffen-SS aswell as the Wehrmacht were ordered to not take any prisoners. There were a lot of well indoctrinated people in the Waffen SS, people who believed in what they did, probably quite some who even liked it. But for everyone who at some point decided to not follow orders, to do the right thing, it meant death. Disobey an order in the waffen SS given by Hitler himself meant execution on the spot. I do think that in such a situation a man has to do the right thing. But i don't think that a man killing for revenge is any better than the ones following orders like soldiers are supposed to or wanting to survive, like most humans do.
The German Tiger 1 tank is Tiger 131.
Today, only seven Tiger I tanks survive in museums and private collections worldwide.
Tiger 131 is the only example restored to running order.
They put another one to work last month, if i am not mistaken. 2 running now
@@altairtodescatto awesome
I believe when this was filmed, they used the real Tiger for the initial far away scenes and switched to a mock up for the closer ones since it was the only working Tiger at the time. Glad they got another one in running order. It usually did take four Shermans to take out one German tank. The German was more heavily armed, but the Sherman was faster and a rear shot was its best option. Good info everyone.
131 is a beauty to behold
It is based on a true story of a tank crew who held out. It wasn't called Fury though. I also think everyone in it died or everyone lived. I cannot remember but it is based on a true story. It's not in lockstep with the real story, however. The movie was more about the horrors of war and aimed to glorify it less I would think.
This movie is a great movie it shows that war is ugly and it’s something us innocent will hopefully never know
👍👍
@@MJoy4Fun please watch windtalkers starring Nicolas cage. 🙏🙏🙏
They're mad at Don because he's showing favoritism to Norman because Norman's so innocent, but the only reason he's innocent is because he didn't have to kill and suffer and sacrifice and watch their friends die like they did. His hands are clean only because someone else did the dirty, deadly, traumatizing work it took to stop the German war machine while he was in the rear safely typing. Until he got put with them, he was practically an embodiment of the military slang term "REMF" which is an acronym for "Rear Echelon Mother F**ker."
POGs and REMFs have to prove themselves twice as hard to Grunts.
The thing is though, so many people volunteered. So many people chose to get in the mud and blood and guts and kill people, and then get mad at the people who DIDN'T choose Mud, Blood and Guts. Someone who signed up for the war, getting mad at someone forced into the war...that's crazy. That's a wild thought process that only the front lines of war could create. This entire movie can be summed up by this sentence: "You don't want me in your fucking tank? I don't want to be in your fucking tank either, neither of us want this, so why are you screaming at me?" Edit: Now that I'm watching this again...I don't see much favoritism towards Norman. It seems like everyone including Don hated him. It was only that one breakfast/lunch scene that Don was first kind to Norman.
@@jacket5456 Regardless of your job in the military, especially in a combat arms unit, and especially if you aren't combat arms, but attached. You have to prove yourself, you have to show that you don't take no shit, and that your part of the team. Even our supply room was like that in an infantry company, if you were a new private with no experience, you were gonna catch 7 shades of shit until everyone agrees otherwise.
Yeah, I see your point and I still hate them and I would have liked to see War Daddy kick their teeth in. I do have to concede that "Animal", or whatever he was called, did apologize to Norman and admit he was a better man than the rest of them.
The scene where they name him the machine chokes me up for reasons.
Macchinneeeeee
Its a special moment when you receive your nickname/callsign. I remember when I got mine... - Ghostwalker
Hey! Can you guys please watch Glory? It’s an American civil war film starring Matthew Broderick, Denzel Washington and Morgan Freeman. Barely anyone on RUclips has watched it. It’s a completely different style than the world war 2 films. And also it’s a true story. Have a good day!
To put in perspective the German that was executed was wearing a M1 US GI Infantry Winter coat, that means it was looted. Now executing him when he surrendered is a war crime in the Geneva Convention but no one in that group would have backed any story of a war crime being committed due to the coat the man was wearing. That coat could have belonged to a friend of theirs for all the GI's knew and yes this was more common than people in any nation realize.
Edit:
They sent Norman as a scout due to the Assistant Driver position not being a important position, granted with the tracks disabled the Driver or Assistant Driver are unneeded positions so either could have worked. However due to Gordo's experience he would be able to do more to help make repairs than Norman could have. Bible fires the gun, Don is the commander and is the eyes of the vehicle and then the loudmouth [ forgot his name ] is the loader. Those three positions make the unmovable tank into an AT bunker and are all needed so you can't send them. Norman being sent ahead as forward observer is the correct call not due to inexperience but rather due to the fact that the only thing he is useful in the tank for is to fire a Machine Gun.
If you take a very liberal interpretation of the rules here, Wardaddy could have explained that the German soldier wearing the US overcoat was disguising himself as a friendly, at which point he becomes a spy rather than a soldier and thus doesn't have any prisoner of war protections and could be summarily executed in the field for espionage. That's obviously not what was happening - the old German soldier was probably just cold and took that coat to stay warm - but after all the executed American POWs were found in the Ardennes about four months before this movie takes place it's likely anyone in a frontline unit wouldn't have had a lot of pity for the guy either, and certainly not enough to raise a stink with the chain of command at the expense of one of their most talented and capable NCOs.
In war our human emotional abuse comes to bear with our enemies. Both sides of WWII Axis and Allies did such massacres of our prisoner enemies history bears it out.
This movie is very great. Because it's different. This movie wasn't lie, wasn't hide anything. It's just what war all about
While I enjoyed this movie a lot and really like how it went back the the Saving Pvt Ryan formula of war being excessively dirty. However, they got a lot of stuff wrong about the tank engagements and perpetuated a LOT of myths about Allied armor.
Such as? I’m genuinely curious
@@boddahif6967 First off the guy would never have been put into a tank. There were a few horror stories of Clerks being sent to combat stations up to 43 (it was unheard of in 44 and 45, when the movie takes place in), but never into a tank as Armor Forces simply wouldn't allow just anyone to be put into the tanks. They would rather have the hull MG position unmanned than put someone not trained on the tanks, doubly so because you'd often see the hull MG blocked by armor added on.
Second that Tiger scene was just dumb. Even ignoring how the Tiger I was virtually absent from the European theater (besides the last months in Africa and a few times in Italy, US 'tankers' only saw the Tiger 3 times on the West front), it was handled poorly to say the least. Every German tanker, especially those trusted to be put into a Tiger, are constantly trained to NOT just pull out into the open and charge enemy tanks, if anything once the Shermans started pushing up he would have started to either fall back or reposition farther down the hedgerows under cover of smoke. Fury also had no reason to try and get around it, the 76.2mm gun it was armed with could go through the frontal armor of a Tiger at 1,200 meters with AP and well over 2 km with HVAP. Even if it was 'supposed' to be representing a 75mm armed M4 (like all of the others you see in the movie), the HVAP munition from that could punch through the Tiger from the front out to 800m... And Fury was shown to load HVAP in the scene where they shot smoke at it because quality control.
There were some doctrinal issues with the child soldier ambush, forest line, and the final stand scenes, but they weren't as bad. Similarly the Urban fighting scene wasn't terrible and wasn't that inaccurate, but there were a few minor things here or there that were just wrong.
Interestingly enough, I've been doing research for the past two years on the 2nd Armored Division. The 67th Armor Regiment's After Action Reports specifically note two Panzer VI Tigers destroyed over the course of the war; One in August of 1944 by 1st/67th during Operation Cobra, and one on March 2nd, 1945. The "only three Tigers were encountered by the Americans" thing is a meme meant to push back against the idea that Tigers were everywhere, but is itself inaccurate. The reality is a bit more complex; Tigers were definitely rare in the West, but not near so rare as you're implying.
Re: Crew shortages, there were definitely instances where armored crews were put on the line with less than ideal crews. Personnel shortages in early 1945 were often critical; C company of the 41st Armored Infantry was down to 22 men on January 3rd, 1945 out of an original 200. 67th Armor Regiment at one point had 32 serviceable tanks that weren't on the line simply because they didn't have people to crew them. You are right, though, in that they'd generally wait for tank-qualified reinforcements rather than scooping up random clerks.
@@thunda7928 3 times (not 3 Tigers total) by the US "Armored" divisions. US TD groups (M10s, M18s, etc) and other Allied forces encountered the Tiger too, that isn't in question. However the common trope in retelling the US Tanker experience is that there was a Tiger everywhere and anywhere, that just about everything they fought was a Tiger.
@Miles Doyle WTF are you doing copy pasta'n the bible for? You must be insane reading your beh-bil.
That scene where Norman is forced to kill that soldier was the hardest scene for me to take in when I first saw this in the theater.
Then, when he faced the camera, I swear I thought he was looking right at me as in asking, "Why?"
... I had honestly forgotten about it for years till I started watching this.
You guys do a great job on this channel....you really get what the movies are about
Thank you 🥰🥰
Watch The Thin Red Line, amazing war film.
It’s amazing, but not for everyone. It’s more of an art house film masquerading as a war film.
@@Perfectly_Cromulent351 It's on the same line as Saving Private Ryan, but more cinematic and thought provoking.
Thank you for the suggestion 😊😊
The American tank called a Sherman by the Brass, Tommie-cookers (They were easy to pierce by most German guns and when hit tended to catch fire), and Ronson by the American troops for the same reason. (Ronson being a lighter with a reputation of lighting every time). In opposition was the German Tiger and Panther. The one you see in the Movie Was a Tiger. The statement you made about tanks taking so much damage, not true. During the battle of Kursk, perhaps the biggest battle in WW2 and the biggest tank battles up to today (the Battle of Kursk, involved as many as 6,000 tanks, 4,000 aircraft and 2 million fighting men), there was a Tiger that would become legend. This Tank took some 200 rounds from tanks and Anti-Tank guns and rockets. All the crew survived, and the tank limped back thirty miles to a repair area. The crew was relieved due to fatigue and herring loss. Some great Books on the life of the tank crews then are; Cutthroats: The Adventures of A Sherman Tank Driver by Robert C. Dick. And on the other side; Tigers in the Mud: The Combat Career of German Panzer Commander Otto Carius Both offer first hand accounts and are riveting.
They finally did it, they've watched it I've been waiting for this
❤️❤️
You might enjoy an earlier war: "Last of the Mohicans" 1992
and a smaller part of the Indian Wars: Robert Redford's "Jeremiah Johnson" 1972
Thank you for the suggestion ❤️
Last of the mohicans is one of the best films ever made, would love to watch you guys react to that
Hello, this was another great reaction. You both always do a great job and make good choices for movies to review. You're one of my favorite reviewers. 😊
Yes!!! Been waiting for y’all to react to this one.
🥰🥰
Good heartfelt reactions from you both, subbed.
Thank you ❤️❤️
Well if they didn't stay at the crossroads and try to hold them off. then a lot of their troops would have died. In sacrificing themselves they saved ton of people
You are correct, war makes monsters. My uncle fought it the Philippines during WWII as a medic. He said the marines he fought with changed, they would come back with necklaces of ears.
This was said in April 1945 one month before the war ended. In the previous December of 1944, The German SS captured 100 US prisoners after a large battle they let them out along the side of the road to use the restroom Drove, trucks up to them, opened the flaps in the back of these trucks where machine Gunners were inside with machine guns already set up, and they shot in Cold Blood dead over 100 / paratroopers who were their prisoners. General Eisenhower issued an order to take no snipers as prisoners anymore. By the time frame of this movie The Americans remembered what The SS had done to American prisoners and were not in the mood to take any of The Germans as live prisoners.
Chenogne massacre near Chenogne , Belgium January 1, 1945 The 11th armored Division 80 German prisoners of war were massacred by their American captors. In war the worst of our human emotional abuse come to bear on our enemies.
My grandfather use to tell me about his time in France and Germany, before he went to the pacific. I still have his bayonet that is caramelized with blood.
The fact he shot that german in the back and the other german with the broken hand, was a war crime.
The Allied forces committed a lot war crimes.
@@tanelviil9149 Germans had more war crimes bruh lol.
@@deathninja16 No they had not.
My grandfather was a 1st Lt in the Pacific. He was captured and sent to a Japanese prison camp. Still have his dogtags... He came back and than went on to fight in Korea.
@@tanelviil9149 perhaps you didn't hear about the fuckin holocaust
I know it sounds crazy but many soldiers and captains say that near the end of the war was the most brutal as the Germans fought till the bitter end
I was a tanker in Baghdad 😓
nice World of tanks meme :) I noticed AP shell detail
Guys, it's really naive to think wars were just from one man's idea. It's a bunch of leaders, politicians, generals' ambitions. And with people, civilians who support them. Of course there are people who don't want the war. But of course there were people who support the war, support the ideology, support the killing and genocide.
It was not one man's idea. It's a whole bunch of people who want something to happened, who support the crazy ideology. The lesson of history is to not forget how everyone can become the supporter of an evil ideology. There are still nazi supporters this day. They are not one man Hitler. They are normal folks.
Civilian who are force to live under the situation is not to be blamed for. But there were also civilians who want Jewish people be killed, who hated them, who framed them or even helps with the geocide. Those civilians were not innocent.
Ive been waiting for this one
🥰🥰
Norman (Logan Lerman) also in a great remake of the movie, 3:10 to Yuma, a Western also starring Russell Crowe, Christian Bale and Ben Foster.
BTW, Rommel, another Tank commander, was also in Africa, and was known as The Desert Fox.
I did some checking for you, because you spurred my curiosity too ... and I found a LOT of responses. Apparently yes, "the most striking thing about Fury, however, is that the whole thing is based on a true story".
Actually, it is NOT based on a specific story, but more of a combination of several true, real-life stories combined together. However, that doesn't discount the realism shown of that kind of life.
It was all of the war stories that Ayer, the director, had heard from his military family (who were all in the war) growing up that gave him the inspiration that led to use as many authentic materials as possible in making the film. I hope all of that was clear and helped.
My grandpa's brother George R. Wilson died just a week before the end of WW2. He was the driver of an American M4 tank and the entire crew died. It happened at the intersection of Karl Heine Str. and Zschochersche Str. in Leipzig Germany, 18 April 1945, He belonged to Company C, 741st Tank Battalion.
He was burned alive in his tank. My Grandpa said when he read the death file on him, that he wished he never did, Because the only thing left of him was one foot in a boot on the drivers side of the tank, That is all that was able to be buried in his Mliltary grave in Europe.
Panzerfaust
Bazookas are American,
If it has a shrapnel shield then it’s a panzershrek
As an ex army tanker I give this flick 👍👍
The SS Troops didn't have armor penetrating weapons at the crossroads.
They had like 10 Panzerfaust guys marching
@@rubenlopez3364 yeah the movie is inaccurate but still a good movie
I don't think the sending them into the room was about taking advantage. I just think it was 2 young kids scared spending fleeting time together
Do you all now see why we don't feel like heroes. We are proud of our service but we will never feel like a hero.
Wardaddy,was a real person from d day on,he knocked out 250+ tanks and vehicle, until his lost his tank,his first name was Lafayette,a Sargent
BTW we need an epic movie feat. "The Battle of Leyte Gulf"
This was the biggest and most multifaceted naval battle in history, and yet, no great movies ??!?!
Task force Taffy!
@@archersfriend5900 AYE AYE! Just a movie on Taffy 3 would be an epic war movie. A small naval force of jeep carriers and destroyers up against Japan's Center Force including the battleship Yamato that outweighed all of Taffy 3 combined, and the US won!
It’s true most tanks were hoses down inside and out and sometimes you didn’t even need to mop up the tank since due to shrapnel would essentially turn the tank into a blender, after that a tank is then patched up or repaired if not scraped and salvaged, new crews thrown in and rearmed and sent back to the frontlines until t
Either the crew needs replacing or the tank is destroyed beyond its usefulness and is then ripped apart and used for spaces ie a space fuel cylinder, wires, ammunition, anything and everything is stripped and used to repair a tank or repair a tank entirely
I got Cod world at war vibes watching this movie. Same as the game it doesn’t care about your feelings and shows a brutally honest depiction of war.
Gotta watch
Lone Survivor
It’s based on a true story and actually happen you’ll be amazed!!!!
Thank you for the suggestion 😊👍
@@MJoy4Fun please react to windtalkers 2002 starring Nicolas cage.
@@jobertdumale872 good suggestion!!! We will check it out too 😉
This is a very hard movie,but beautiful to watch
Standard German tactics, you shoot the tank in the front which stops their advance, shoot the tank at the rear to cut off their retreat after that kill everything else that isn’t a german
Please watch Forrest Gump 😊
great reaction. :)
Thank you ❤️
🪖 the best WW 2 single tank crew ww2 movie was "Sahaha" B/W original with Humphrey Bogart, or modern remake with Jim Belushi 👍
Gordo sacrificed his life to save Norman in the tank.
this is why man more agressive then woman. we suffered this since the history started and they dont. this is in our dna.
I love the guy mentality... I like your reactions as well.. You should be my friends 😂😂
Enjoyed your reaction to this movie 😊….and morag visaya man si ate Joy? 😊😊
Haha wLa jud ka nasayop gang 😂😂👍
They weren't mad at anyone at that table. They were just mad.
i THOUGHT wardaddy was mad at Grady
@@riandraagustian5057 Anger breeds rage, rage doesn't care about proximity. It's beyond reason. The kid was basically an easy target because he was still good among men who "turned bad". Basically like seeing your younger, innocent self, after turning in to something worse.
Its not bazooka. Its Faustpatron
Clint Eastwood's son Scott is a soldier extra in this. Pause at 7:39 and then he wipes his nose.
There is something historically wrong in almost all Hollywood movies you may watch about WW2.
This is the feeling that American soldiers were fighting against the “Bad Evil Nazi Germany” and killing “the fucking Nazis”( as a soldier yelled in this movie) The pinacle of this narrative is probably the movie Inglorious Basterds (one of my favorite movie, cinematographically speaking)
But this is just not true. Nobody in the US thought actually Nazis were “evil” (the extermination camps were discovered at the very end of the War, and Roosevelt have had always seen so far Nazi Germany as a wall against the spread of communism during the 1930’s).
A poll targeting US soldiers before D Day showed that 20 % of them actually really wanted the German defeated while 90 % wanted Japan completely destroyed. This interpretation of “Bad” vs “Evil” is a narrative that come afterwards to justify the war and hide the real motivation behind D Day which were not to let bolshevism spread in Europe.
(That’s what would have happened if Stalin were the only one entering in Berlin)
History is complex, Hollywood is fun but simple (not to say propaganda)
You're going to need tons of citations for this nonsense. The fact that you're talking about "Bolshevism" alone is enough to completely discard anything you've got to say.
For those that don't know "Cultural Bolshevism" was (and still is) a term used in Nazi propaganda.
@@mechanomics2649 LOL so to you, using accurately term bolchevism is a sign that i’m making Nazi propaguanda ? 🤣 Do you just even know what bolchevism means ? I’m sorry but how ignorant are you to say something that dumb ?
A General said war is hell
👍👍
General William Tecumseh Sherman, Union Army, US civil war.
It must have been so devastating to have a loved one die in a tank in the war’ my best friends dad died in one and they couldn’t even Barry him at the funeral because he was blown up in the tank somewhere out in the fields’ and because of that they couldn’t even deliver his ashes back to his family either’ that’s just sad to loose a family member like that.
The action between the tank crew is a realistic . of soldiers under stress.
Love that buddy there plays World of Tanks.
Oh please watch The Great Raid 2005
No reactor has done it, it'll be amazing
Thank you for the suggestion 👍
Hi my favourite reactor couple, please react to the 2017 remake of the famous Finnish war film Tuntematon Sotilas (Unknown Soldier). It has a similar vibe of this movie, it delves into the lives of soldiers during the Winter War of 1939 between Finland and Russia. It has a special place in my heart.
Thanj you and thank you for the suggestion ❤️🥰
The German Soldier sergeant Collier force Norman to shoot him was an SS Soldier and that means unconditional death because SS battalions were cruel as it comes to fighting and they were killing all American soldiers on sight so The Americans responded in the same way.
I was a tanker in the Finnish army and while this movie is audio-visually brilliant I was really disappointed in the story and the tank combat. It's pretty non-sense as far as history and actual tactics is concerned, but damn do those high velocity shells whizzing past sound and look great and you have to give them credit for the real tanks they use in filming.
Were you a tanker in 1944?
@@jakovasour this movie is so fake. You still can enjoy it but its faaaaaaake
That 76mm would definitely go through that Tiger out past 1000. I don't know why they drove AT each other.
@@mackten7220 THERE ARE 4 LIGHTS!
@@jakovasour what you mean 4 lights? English is my third language so maybe i miss something here?
Did u know? this film was sponsored by war gaming (wot)
🤔
During ww2 you got on the job training
Fight until the end 🔥🔥❤❤
You'd love the movie 'My Way', it's a true ww2 story and one of my favorite.
Dining scene the crew was angry. They have been angry for some time
This movie puts u in Norman's shoes, and takes u on his arc! Germany had much beter equipment than the allies. Better handguns, the had even AK style rifles, but not yet mass produced, better shoulder fired rockets, better tanks better planes. If they hadnt attacked Russia, and if the americans had won the battle of the Bulge, no way we win this war. Because they already had drone planes, were already working on mass producing jet fighters, and would have been nuclear by the end of 45. Sadly, Norman's prediction for Emma came true. best job i ever had means, i love u guys. Norman played the child in the great remake movie,3.10 to Yuma!! sort of based on a true story, the last battle. Type in here, Audie Murphy in WW2!
21:15 The reason they sent Norman to recon was because he is the only person on the crew that is useless in repairing the tank, since according to his story, he never went to tank training. Of course, it still does not make much sense that he is there, since according to his own story, he would never have been in Germany in the first place. By Norman's account, he has been in the Army for 8 weeks, and disregarding travel times that is only enough time for him to have gone through basic training...and the US Army was not sending men right from basic training directly to Europe in 1945. At the very least, Norman would have had to go through basic training and some kind of occupational training for his actual military job. So in reality, Norman is actually still in the United States and he is just arriving at whatever base his MOS training is going to happen at, not being assigned to a tank crew in Germany. 🖖💯✌😏
He may have only been active for 8 weeks and had already gone through basic and mos training. In the MC we get paid active duty pay during basic, but never got considered active until we completed bct
@@jakebcroy4560 But again...the Army was not even sending clerks to Europe anymore in 1945...they had no need for more of them...only if he had actually been to tank school would he even have been shipped overseas. But it does not much matter to the vast majority of folks. The film makers knew they could mostly get away with sacrificing realism for the drama...since only a very few history-minded (obsessed LOL) folks like me would even notice. A big part of me wants to like the movie, but I like accuracy and realism, and this one fails on those counts in many ways. I take points off my rating, but I still would not call it a bad movie by any means. ✌
@@iKvetch558 I think there’s a good place for accuracy and realism. Something like hacksaw ridge that’s based on a true story and took the liberty of not even placing half of the true acts committed to make it more realistic as an example. Here so much, I don’t mind them taking liberties. But for this movie the director did say that it’s a clash of multiple war stories from veterans, so perhaps someone truly had this happen to them in 1944. But I’m not one to say, as I’ve never heard of it happening. But I have heard of other MOS’s being sent to different jobs they weren’t trained for, so it’s not entirely inaccurate.
@@jakebcroy4560 I definitely agree with you about Hacksaw Ridge...no argument there. It is an excellent balance of drama and realism...I was not struck by any massive inaccuracies when I saw it. I just wish they had gone with a little bit less dramatic license in Fury...if they had made things just a bit more realistic, they could have had something really good, like Hacksaw Ridge. 💯✌
The US Armored forces had some of the lowest casualty amounts of any direct combat forces. The Germans had some superior tanks, but they had tons of effective anti tank weapons and from June 6 1944 the Germans were normally on the defensive. The allies were required to repeatedly attack prepared defensive positions all the way across Europe. That is the main idea behind the tank. Penetrate and move faster than the retreating forces and hit rear areas to disrupt supplies and communications.
Armored platoons are the modern equivalent of heavy cavalry forces.
Tiger tanks so crazy good... mor then future stuff.
Armour penerating shell, it’s err Armour Piercing but ok😂, also mission comes first… that’s what everyone is trained to go by. Whatever the cost
Brad Pitt just wanted to have a couple of hours of some relative normalcy before going into a difficult mission, and Jon Bernthal fucked it up because he's been through so much shit that he can't switch off and doesn't see the reason for it.
Also keep in mind that the US Sherman tank was far inferior to the German Tiger and Panzer tanks, the reason US armor divisions were so effective is mainly because we flooded Europe with them. Theirs may have been better, but we had MORE :P
Sherman's were meant for infantry support, not direct tank on tank combat. M4 Sherman and Panzer III and Panzer IV were pretty much on par with each other in terms of firepower and protection with later models of Sherman's being up gunned and up armored beating the protection of the late war Panzer VI and even the Panther at some ranges. When Sherman's encountered tanks, the majority of the time tank destroyers like the M10, M18 and M36's were called in from the rear to take care of them.
German tanks such as the Panzer IV had the same role of the Sherman in being infantry support with the Panzer III being the tip of the sword in terms of pushing on the front line. It's only when encountering more armored tanks like the KV-1 and T-34 where the German Army up gunned and up armored their tanks so they can match Soviet armor. The Tiger was designed as a heavy break through tank and exploit weak area's of the enemy lines. As the tanks would exploit enemy lines, it would need to penetrate every vehicle it came across, the 88mm flak cannon was known to destroy enemy armor consistently, even the heavy Soviet tanks, so they modified the 88mm flak cannon into a tank gun and used it as the man gun for the Tiger 1.
Hitlers youth
Anyone be it a five year old throwing grenades to your ninety year old grandparents, everyone had to fight
You guys always have nice reactions lol. Still waiting for the dead by daylight spotlight trailers reactions 🙃
Thank you ❤️
Guys new league of legends worlds song!
18:59 "AP is Armor penetration i know that from World of tanks" i thought i was thought only one that learned from videogames
Edit:That shit had me laughing
Death Before Dismount
18:57 *Gamer Vibes* Right Here. 😂
9:10 my bro just surender
Where are the Marvel movies?
Please react to "Der Hauptman" ("The Captain"); a German movie about a real history in WWII. Good job, greetings from Mexico.
Hi friends Give Reaction on the "fury of NTR 30 Trailer." 🔥🔥🔥💥💥💥💥
If you haven't already reacted, check out Generation Kill.
yessssssssssssssss world of tanks ;)
edge of tomorrow
Most important scenes missed.
Your gf or wife talks exactly like my ex girlfriend. My ex girlfriend is from Porto Rico. I also play W.O.T. on Xbox. I enjoyed the reaction. You two should do a reaction to Sergeant York it's based on a true story.
Thank you for watching ❤️
Such mixed feelings about this movie. On the one hand, it is very compelling and very thrilling, but on the other it is very very inaccurate in too many ways to be realistic. The tank combat in particular is really badly done, even though the tanks themselves are just amazing. The more I see people react to it, the more the lack of realism begins to seem too emotionally manipulative in a really over the top way. 🖖✌
Realism? We’re you a tank driver in ww2?
@@josea.martinez2134 Don't need to be a tank crew to know that German tank crews we're trained NOT to charge the enemy. Or that they were trained to spot and kill Allied tanks with long guns FIRST, because the long barrel 76mm on Fury and the 17pounder on the British Firefly could actually kill the Tiger from the front at significant ranges. Or that they were trained to stop before firing because their guns were not stabilized. Or that it is ridiculous that Norman is even in Germany having only been in the Army 8 weeks...and that he would really still be in the US getting his training for his military job specialty. I could go on and on...but as good as this film may be, it is not very realistic in much of the combat that it portrays. Here is a decent and short video about some of the things I mentioned and a few more. ruclips.net/video/31FcGinPl38/видео.html
@@iKvetch558 norman wasn’t supposed to be the assistant driver. He literally explained in the beginning that he was a clerk typist and they pull out from the truck. Towards the end of the war was when the casualties were bigger because the true German nationalist fought to the death. And as for the tank scene, it’s just a movie
@@josea.martinez2134 8 weeks in the Army is only enough time to complete basic training. Also, they were not even sending clerks to Europe anymore in the Spring of 1945, any replacements in the theater would be all the way done with training in some kind of combat arm...or would be a wounded combat veteran returning from a hospital somewhere in the ETO. They made Norman way more green than he could have been because having him be unrealistically green amps up the drama of the film. I recognize how gripping Norman's story is supposed to be, but that does not make it realistic.
@@iKvetch558 go watch a documentary then
you lucky to be with this girl man she perfect
*its a bazooka* no no no panzerfaust
Great reaction, y’all. This is one of my favorite war movies because of Norman’s contradiction to the rest of the crew. Wardaddy is caught somewhere in the middle, and what I saw is that Wardaddy and Norman learned from each other. Wardaddy began valuing humanity to some degree, while Norman began understanding the brutal necessities of war. It’s all about walking a fine line, war is hell, and your opponent is human too, but unfortunately the best soldiers are the ones that can desensitize themselves.
"The Deer Hunter" is the best war movie. More comparable in vibes to Godfather meets Schindler's List style of movie. I cant really think of another pair to compare it to off the top of my head. Hope you get around to it
Not the “best war movie”
@@charliefyb is the best war film
@@KurticeYZ you have all your brain cells?
@@charliefyb you have opinions? Well change them all to mine. Or else you're nothing to me. (Thats how you sound)
The deer hunter isn't a war movie, its about people dealing with the effects of war after its over.
If you liked brad pitt here i"d recommwnd another one of his movies either Troy or Mr. & Mrs. Smith
You should watch the problems of fury by potential history
Problems being that it's a movie and is not a documentary.
Simple History should be enjoyed with caution. He is quite Anti Axis/German and pro Allies/American. He has some facts right but some facts wrong.
Next react gameplay Detroit become human