Our First Time Reacting to Fury (2014) - Full Movie Group Reaction

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
  • Couple First Time Reacting to Fury (2014) - Full Movie Group Reaction
    Full Reactions Here: / peruntzuu
    Other Channels:
    ➡️ Tzuu's Channel: / @tzuwu123
    ➡️Perun's Channel: / @perunktms
    Business Email: Perun1022@gmail.com
    Thanks for watching, bye :)
    #reaction #moviereaction #comedymovies

Комментарии • 45

  • @perunandtzuu
    @perunandtzuu  Год назад +2

    Full Reaction: www.patreon.com/posts/fury-2014-full-86250644

  • @AZ70900
    @AZ70900 Год назад +2

    Facts about fury:
    1-Best OST name : Norman / Emma
    2-Movie versions : 2
    3-While the storyline is fictional, the depiction of Fury and its commander Wardaddy parallels the experience of several real Allied tankers, such as the American tank commander Staff Sergeant Lafayette G. "War Daddy" Pool, who landed just after D-Day and destroyed 258 enemy vehicles before his tank was knocked out.

  • @bwilliams463
    @bwilliams463 Год назад +20

    This movie is barely historically-accurate, but the performances were outstanding.

    • @Hydepop19
      @Hydepop19 Год назад

      Who cares if it was accurate? It’s not like they captured hitler and killed him or something lol I would imagine guys in tanks killed nazis and were killed themselves lol idk if you need to be more accurate than that.

    • @Nero-Caesar
      @Nero-Caesar Год назад

      How exactly do you mean not tactically accurate?

    • @bwilliams463
      @bwilliams463 Год назад +2

      @@Nero-Caesar For instance, Fury mounts the powerful 76.2 mm gun, which could have taken on the Tiger from the front or side. After they hit the mine, there is no way 5 men with hand tools could have fixed it. The logs on Fury's side were intended to protect the tank from shaped charges like the Panzerfaust; the shot from the tiger would have punched right through them, and possibly would have gone all the way into Fury and out the other side. The marching SS battalion had at least six soldiers carrying Panzerfausts, but they only fired off two of them. An SS battalion on a mission would not have stopped to fight one immobilized tank; they would have simply re-grouped and gone around it. Real historical experts could undoubtedly list off more.

    • @Nero-Caesar
      @Nero-Caesar Год назад +1

      @bwilliams463 I think it might not necessarily be realistic in some aspects but if it was it wouldn't be fun to watch or be able to achieve the vision of the movie
      I think the reason the ss army stopped was to just check it out it was on the way and they thought it was dead
      And as a prior 19k they would definitely attempt to fix it and they normally have spare tracks and roadwheels with them
      The thing about the movie that jumps out at me is they'd never have the platoon leader or platoon Sergent in the front of the column

    • @miketrujillo3677
      @miketrujillo3677 Год назад

      Im speaking from war thunder experience but prolly not the front but yea

  • @rileytruax766
    @rileytruax766 2 месяца назад

    RPGs were not invented until 1974 the germans had panzerFaust which is german for tank fist

  • @ShagGnarok
    @ShagGnarok 7 месяцев назад +2

    Cut some of the best parts out wtf

  • @tbnamj
    @tbnamj Год назад +1

    Saludo desde la República Dominicana excelente vídeo

  • @off9318
    @off9318 8 месяцев назад

    Guys, you wanted a reaction to the film. But instead, I just see continuous comments that do not give time for reactions. So, sorry, but the wrong blogging decision is ruining everything...

  • @shukvirgrewal6968
    @shukvirgrewal6968 Год назад +4

    The tank they faced was the Tiger one tank one of the best in the war, if this movies was accurate Norman’s tank would had not survived

    • @simonbarabash2151
      @simonbarabash2151 Год назад

      Only because the Tiger would have targeted the lead tank, which was fury. It still would have lost the engagement and likely with fewer American losses, and the main guns on the Shermans (especially the long 76s, and doubly so with with late war ammo) could reliably kill a tiger from the front at such a close range.
      The "iT tAkEs 5 sHerMans" meme is for midwits who get all their ww2 knowledge from youtube videos and mass media docs all sourced from the same myths. Mostly centered around the infamous crock of shit written by Belton Cooper.

    • @freedomefighterbrony9053
      @freedomefighterbrony9053 Год назад

      Tiger was definitely not the best tank just because it has strong armor and a good gun dosen't make it the best

    • @SinghAuto5055
      @SinghAuto5055 Год назад

      @@freedomefighterbrony9053 I know I said one of the best, not the best, I would say the panther was the best tank.

    • @cjay5641
      @cjay5641 Год назад

      Kill count wise Russian T-34 is the best tank in WW2. Tiger and panther was indeed the best when it comes to tank warfare, alied tanks nightmare was coming face to face with a tiger. This movie depicts literary the worst tiger commander I have seen in a movie. They never take out the last tank in an armoured column, first tank in the column is the tank they target to halt the column movement. Which means as per correct way fury would not survive this battle 😅

    • @simonbarabash2151
      @simonbarabash2151 Год назад

      @@cjay5641 T-34 had a pretty abysmal kill to loss rate actually, it was a pretty good design in a lot of ways but like anything soviet the actual build quality was inconsistent and often outright shoddy also poor tactical use led to needlessly high losses.
      But you're right that Fury wouldn't have survived as it was the lead tank, but if both sides were following procedure then Fury (as the commander of the platoon) wouldnt have been in the lead, and regardless the rest of the platoon would have killed the tiger if it tried to fight it out instead of shooting and withdrawing.

  • @declanflynn2580
    @declanflynn2580 Год назад +1

    In how the action is its not very accurate. But all the equipment is correct

  • @ADR199E
    @ADR199E Год назад +1

    Yes! 👍

  • @-Griffin-
    @-Griffin- Год назад +1

    Why subtitles ?

    • @Hydepop19
      @Hydepop19 Год назад

      Why not? Is it hard for you to focus?😐

  • @TheHellHeadbanger
    @TheHellHeadbanger Год назад +1

    7:55 the boy who fired the Panzerfaust and his buddies were members of the Hitlerjugend or Hitler Youth. The purpose of Hitler Youth was for Adolf Hitler's Child Soldiers to help the Waffen SS and Wehrmacht in war such as ammunition carriers, radio operators, driver/pilot assistance, and also being medics or nurses for the girls in the Hitler Youth.
    11:48 the Nazi soldier who wanted to surrender broke a code of relinquishment (I don't remember what's it called) because he was wearing a U.S military uniform. Wearing an enemy uniform, whether stolen from dead soldiers or forcefully stripping off the uniform while the soldier is alive is a death sentence, no arguments.
    20:00 the Tiger tank was the most feared tank in WW2. The standard American tank "Sherman" was no match for the Tiger, King Tiger, and the standard German Panther tanks. Allied soldiers (except for Soviet Union) had to rely on heavy aircraft bombers to destroy the Nazi Tank Divisions.
    31:40 that was a Waffen SS sniper. By the look of his eyes, that is Wardaddy's German counterpart. He must have been in the Eastern Front against the Soviet Union but when Nazi Germany failed to invade the Soviet Union, the sniper must have been reassigned to defend the Western Front against the Allies.
    33:57 the young Nazi SS is Norman's German counterpart. The Youngblood must've participated in the Hitler Youth and after his graduation, gained access to the Waffen SS battalion. Once the Youngblood saw the indiscriminate executions involving German civilians, the Youngblood was probably displeased and tried to leave the battalion. But the Youngblood's fate is unknown.

    • @simonbarabash2151
      @simonbarabash2151 Год назад

      " Tiger tank was the most feared tank in WW2" is the only correct fact you had in that entire paragraph about the tank.

    • @TheHellHeadbanger
      @TheHellHeadbanger Год назад

      @@simonbarabash2151 have you read everything about the Tiger tank?

    • @simonbarabash2151
      @simonbarabash2151 Год назад +1

      @@TheHellHeadbanger I know that it wasnt the "invincible super tank" that some shitty TV docs and questionable memoirs (like deathtraps) portrayed it as.
      It was a pretty decent heavy tank, particularly its main gun, but its false reputation for being near impossible to kill probably comes from the narrow point of its introduction in north Africa when the allies had fewer large AT guns (if indeed the reputation EVER had a basis in reality). By 1944 the western allies had made guns that could destroy it both more available and flexible by mounting them on tanks and TDs.
      Its effective frontal armor wasn't actually super impressive. The upper glacis was 100mm but with virtually no slope. Most Sherman variants had 60mm but with sloping it was effectively 90mm, and that's not counting the uparmoured variants. Which is only 1 example of why heavy tanks were considered such a dead end compared to more versatile mediums by the end of the war.
      And the allies did not in fact need fighter bombers to kill tanks, nor were aircraft even very effective in that role. What they did do was harass any German road movements and kill softer support vehicles (like supply trucks), indirectly hampering the Panzers ability to operate. They also took a major psychological toll on the crews, even if they only rarely destroyed panzers outright.
      Not that a discussion on tigers even very relevent to the success of Allied tanks. The main threats were AT guns, infantry, artillery, and Stugs purely due to their numbers.

    • @TheHellHeadbanger
      @TheHellHeadbanger Год назад

      @@simonbarabash2151 doesn't have to be destructive like what we see in fiction war movies but the Tiger still earned its notoriety

    • @simonbarabash2151
      @simonbarabash2151 Год назад

      @@TheHellHeadbanger That's why I agreed on the statement it was feared. It absolutely was feared (more than it deserved) and it was a good tank (insomuch as any heavy tank could be called "good")
      But German tanks were really not these superior fighting machines that only lost due to overwhelming numbers. They had significant drawbacks and their advantages were not enough to compensate.
      Not that I'm one of those revisionists who think everything about the German military was crap. They were really on to something with the Panther but it didn't have time to mature, nor could any tank have fixed Germany's hopeless strategic situation by the time it appeared.

  • @themidsouthcyclist8880
    @themidsouthcyclist8880 Год назад +2

    Dude: you talk too much. Just watch and let yourself feel something.

    • @rileytruax766
      @rileytruax766 2 месяца назад

      dude thats what a reaction is your here for the persons commentary on the movie/video/ show that they are reacting to if you want to watch the movie without anyone talking then go watch the movie