Pilots Can't Control the 737 MAX...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 мар 2024
- A new proposed airworthiness directive (AD) by the FAA highlights more control issues on the 737 MAX and shines a light on Boeing's poor quality control... #737max #boeing #aviation #planespotting #airbus #787 #737 #airplane #avgeek #boeing737 #faa
Игры
The problem is corporate greed over quality and safety
Like the guy who worked for Boeing was found dead in his car due to “suicide” . While sueing Boeing for cutting corners . Media dosent talk about it
That’s only half the problem. The other half is they’re DE& I hires that past 5 years at Boeing and all of there suppliers.
@@Phat737???
Sounds like a repeatable cliche your mom told you.
Make the elite to fly Boeing like all of usand stop them flying their private plane. Then they will care more.
This is what happens when the FAA allows companies to check their own work
That could work well, assuming that the FAA does audits to verify that the checks are being done properly and thoroughly. Methinks they aren't there yot.
That's actually the exact opposite way to see the problem. The government is in bed with Boeing, FAA will turn the other way and is completely useless in this case where Boeing has a near monopoly, thanks to government playing favorites in the market. Boeing would get CRUSHED if we actually had a free market in air travel. We don't.
The FAA doesn't have the resources to check Boeing's work...
@@bobbygetsbanned6049 they had the resources before, but they stopped giving Boeing oversight and therefore stopped using money dedicated to giving Boeing more oversight
@bobbygetsbanned6049 They would have the capability if the Public Administration wanted it. Public regulators always can use whatever means and time is required. And if it is not possible, the product or procedure is not approved until it is achieved. By definition , regulators have to have the upper hand, especially when human safety is in play.
Ok, I know that IRL politicians are in the bed with big corporations.
(Boeing, Big Pharma,...)
I remember reading a Reddit threat of a former Boeing engineer. He mentioned how the higher ups were firing the engineers who weren’t giving the “go ahead” on certain designs. They’d bring in a new guy that would bend the knee for the corporate overlords. And here we are with planes that aren’t built with absolute precision.
And, of course, it's the new guy whose head ends up on the chopping block
"So I get a new safety guy"
Those whistle blowers have mysteriously died. These companies are becoming worse than Russia and China. Soon you'll have employees falling out of random windows.
The FAA also needs to be investigated.
Yeah, there was too many of them on site, and in bed, with Boeing at the plants.
It’s not really the FAA at fault. The situation that brought this about isn’t an FAA problem but a congress problem. Congress gave the FAA oversight of the manufacturing Quality Control system and then didn’t give the FAA a budget or man power to do it. If I remember exact numbers, the FAA has less than 10 inspectors in the entire country doing the QC work on this type of thing. Even if those inspectors were robots that never stopped working they aren’t a large enough body to sufficiently check and track every facet of an airliner’s build, maintenance and complete QC status. This is why the worthless self check system came about. This left inspectors with needing to only look at a very minuscule number of aircraft systems.
All of government is irresponsible corrupt all the way down to small town local government this country is turning into Mexico faster than a snowball headed for hell
We will let Biden do that
This is what happens when money becomes your priority, not safety or quality
Or probably because this a fault with Spirit Aerosystems and is being incorrectly blamed on Boeing. Also, stop overreacting. Any system as complex as an airliner will inevitably have faults be exposed later down the line. It is inevitable. Boeing is still very safe. Also why do you not pay attention to fuel tank issues with the A321XLR, paint issues with the A350 or the Pratt & Whitney issues on the A320neo family. Flaws will be discovered and things will break. It is inevitable; and if that concerns you, don’t fly at all.
@@papatango2362well said bro. Well said 👏
@papatango2362 But the difference is how many issues with Boeing were I'm the past 2 or 3 months compared to the airbus issues. I would say faulty door plugs are more serious than paint jobs, and the a321 xlr is not in service yet.
@papatango2362 However, I do genuinely understand what you are saying as almost all the issues with Boeing aircraft are problems with the assembly which is why Spirit aerosystems should be held accountable but at the same time if there are this many problems surely they would stop manufacturing with spirit aerosystems
@@papatango2362 Spirt was once a part of Boeing, then split from the company, so the same still applies. The a321XLR isn’t even certified, pick on it when it’s in service. I get your point with the a350 and you can talk bout it, but the 737 has had repeats over and over again, from MCAS to this. Also the P&W issues are completely separate unlike your claim of Boeing and spirt
And the former Boeing engineer whistle blower also found dead..... just a coincidence?
62 years old ..extremely suspicious circumstances..not to mention 30 years with Boeing
@@tomstarzeck7137 Appears to be mafia style execution 😳
According to Boeings algorithm it had nothing to do with them
They want it obvious enough to deter any more like him
@@user-nf4sd4ss3o Thank YOU, Inspector!
Airbus headed by an engineer. Boeing headed by an accountant.
A clown
@@davidstager173 it's pedophiile Biden's era that is full of corruption, genocide, and impotence.
What we have learned over the years with past plane crashes is that even the tiniest, simplest defects (when ignored or overlooked) can lead to catastrophic failure.
If it's Boeing, I'm not going.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Me too! 😊
If it's airbus, you must.
Just if it’s a max 777 -300ER 747 737 757 are capable aircrafts
Wow never heard that response before.
Well looks like the Boeing 737 MAX is the DC-10 of the 21st century.
legit same case: plane that tries to kill you every time you fly it
The MAX has had more issues than the 10.
They fixed the 10. The verdict is still out on the MAX.
It’s way worse. Most of the DC-10’s problems were engine issues. But it was a solid and reliable airframe.
@@patton303the cargo doors would have disagreed
Both designed by brought to you by Mcdonald Douglas
Edit McDonnell for some reason auto corrected to McDonald's I think it fits better
The main problem is the executives moved headquarters away from the engineering site. Engineers were no longer included in the decision making process because of greed, safety took a back seat.
The whole problem is the FAA and government. Boeing is not part of the problem, they are who government has decided to target.
I never understood the move
One question, I'm flying on one soon (737), should I change plane or will it be okay, it is around a 4,4 and a half hour flight?
@@Lrsk_ wear seatbelts as the doors might fly off :)
@@Lrsk_you will be fine. I’ve flown on them multiple times, and I’ll
Fly on them again. Just flew on one in February on American Airlines 4 hour flight. They are honestly quiet and fine. The pilots aren’t going to take off if they don’t feel confident in the aircraft.
I remember when people didn't want to fly on an Airbus because of reliability issues. How times have changed.
And it will eventually go back to Airbus. That’s how it works. I don’t have any issue flying Boeing. The chance of anything happening, slim. Even if the spoiler deployed. It’s not going to lead to a crash unless the pilots are asleep.
@@alanhinkel420 Or you’re 60 feet off of the ground… 🫤
#SorryPete #AirCanada621 #DC8
@@alanhinkel420 What about a open Door ? I dont think someone can save you from that
@@alanhinkel420 Found the Boeing exec
@@robloxiasquad672 What about an open door? You have to include context.
You missed the opportunity to name the video something like "spoiler alert: another problem for the max 9"
I mean, you won’t get another great opportunity than this 😂😂😂
Oh, it's Boeing after all, they sure will deliver more opportunities.
... nvm.
It's a problem with all MAX variants
Lol!!! Good one!
Good one!
I saw an interview with a Boeing employee that was asked if he would fly on the plane he was building. After a pause he said no.
How would you rate this comment RUclips put on your comment. I put EXCELLENT! Then RUclips asks WHY with different answer to click. I clicked other! RUclips didn’t of course ask to clarify other BECAUSE I WOULD Have PUT……. BECAUSE ITS TRUE!!!! RUclips is turning into LIBERAL GARBAGE!!! GARBAGE IN GARBAGE OUT IS WHAT YOUR GET RUclips IF YOU HAVE CERTAIN VIEWERS THAT VIEW CERTAIN CHANNELS!!! SO YOUR GONNA GET ANSWERS FROM MOSTLY ONE PERSPECTIVE AND YOU HEN WHAT…….. BAN FREE SPEECH!! HERE YOU GO RUclips “I would absolutely not fly a Max airplane,” Ed Pierson, a former senior manager on Boeing's 737 program, told the LA Times. “I've worked in the factory where they were built, and I saw the pressure employees were under to rush the planes out the door.Feb 1, 2024
Was he the same guy who got suicided?
@@KhaledTheSaudiHawkII I don't know, the interview I saw was from 7 or 8 years ago, a while back. I guess employees have been concerned about build quality for years now.
Yea and the pause was only theatrical to reinforce the idea that they had thought long and hard about it
All of the people working on these planes from top to bottom have said for years that they won't fly on them. There was no thinking required to answer that question
@@SampsonGG nope, you are correct..... He knew his answer.
Massive lawsuits is the only thing these profiteers understand. Sue them into bankruptcy!
Boeing will always be propped up but US government. There is no chance they will go bankrupt
LOL Boeing brings in billions of dollars a year. Not going to work!
Will you pay for the workers salary? Because a lot of people are going to loose their jobs if Boeing fails.
Don't get me wrong, I am not a fan of Boeing but surely there is a middle ground between this and " sueing to bankruptcy"... I mean, Airbus is doing fine, having profit and doing safe planes.
They won't understand because it's just the company that gets the lawsuit. It simply doesn't affect the suits, and if it does, then just in the shape of a golden parachute.
How about making the executives personally accountable (as in, they have to pay for the damages, not the company they ruined, plus jail time), then they would learn
Well someone's gotta make military aircraft
I wish there was a follow up!!! The problem was corrected on the only one it affected the Max 9 with a 20 min software update
Not as dangerous as whistle blowing.
Yeah, the guy said if he died it wouldn't be suicide. He died the next day.
Former quality manager or something. Has been speaking against Boeing for 7 years and trying to get them accountable. He finally succeeded in getting a court case and is found dead the day before his testimony in court
@@gdok6088 Move along, nothing to see here. …..
Yeah honestly they should scrap the whole fucking plane, start again from scratch, and never give it the max name ever again
4 missing bolts on an old plane design is different from 4 missing bolts on a new clean sheet plane design?
The door plugs have been around since the 707, the technology is proven to be safe.
It only became a safety hazard due to Boeing's subterranean safety standards. The 33 product audits failed from 89 speaks volumes about Boeing's unfixable unsafety culture.
The 787 was just the beginning from what we see now as a result.
@@jantjarks7946And what about Airbus’s issues such as those with its landing gears or fuel tanks? How come the spotlight is on Boeing so much?
aycc-nbh - Should I start with the criminal conspiracy with the MAX crashes until today of what is happening with Boeing's? It's already difficult to get a comprehensive list together already how Boeing cannot get its act together.
2024 was supposed to be a good year for Boeing, that worked out...
And the list is about certified planes. Unlike the Airbus, where the EASA is doing its job without cosy relationships in politics or Boeing's FAA. As such, why are you even raising the fuel tank redesign? That's exactly what a certification is about, to find safety concerns. Do you really want me to point at the 777X certification process so badly? Let me guess, Boeing's FAA couldn't find any safety concerns before certification of any Boeing plane?
The latest issue with a certified Boeing plane seems to be the inability of Boeing to exchange a simple switch since 2017, when the issue with the 787 pilot seats popped up first. Instead LATAM had to deal with it and more than 50 people injured.
Does Boeing always have to wait until finally an incident happens before getting its act together?
@@jantjarks7946What do you mean by EASA having no relation with Airbus? It would only be in their rational self-interest to have one with them, since harming one of the two major passenger airplane manufacturers in the world would mean they would be collecting less money from overflight fees and other fees related to airports and air travel.
I’m raising the fuel tank design because it would only mean Airbus is not designing the safest aircraft they can and they are facing just as significant of problems as Boeing or at least somewhere in the ballpark.
And wasn’t the area that B787 flew over known for being turbulent to begin with? An A330 also experienced something similar recently, so it may not have been something related to the aircraft.
@@aycc-nbh7289 There are enough aeroplane businesses building jets which will pay overflight fees, no need to cozy up like Boeing's FAA.
And you are raising the fuel tank design as it's the only way to deflect from Boeing's unsafety culture and the criminal conspiracy they committed.
Fun fact, Airbus is addressing it within the framework of the certification process, like any other aeroplane producer has to do it. Boeing is addressing its issues with criminal conspiracies and serious air travel incidents instead. You deflecting with Airbus shows how weak your argument really is.
Just for your information, the DoJ has launched another criminal investigation into Boeing.
As such, no one comes even close to the criminal behavior of Boeing.
And a faulty switch on pilot seats, that should have been reworked since 2017, has nothing to do with turbulence.
You asked why the spot light is on Boeing and you got your answer. Now it's up to you to accept reality or not.
How any aircraft manufacturer can skimp on safety is truly reprehensible. The FAA and US government needs to have a thorough inquiry into how Boeing handles its business.
FAA and US government are already heavily involved in the whole process....
The FAA and Boeing are in bed together. Nothing can be accomplished.
“I don’t always fly in a Boeing airplane, but when I do, I always bring my own toolbox onboard” - every most interesting person in the world.
Well, I don’t know what the problem is. I mean missing doors, falling off wheels, spoilers deploying accidentally, just a normal day at the office…
And sudden diving towards the Tasman Sea throwing 50 passengers to the roof...
You forgot the unpredictable autopilot, because the engines were too large.
...and today a panel "just fell off" a 737 departing San Francisco. 🤦
You know, I was always told that flying is dangerous. Boeing are just out to prove it.
@@jasono2139 Was that a MAX?
POV:When you hire a business man to be the ceo of an ENGINEERING firm.
This is exactly how McDonnell Douglas fell.
How could an engineer possibly operate as a CEO? Did that actually make sense in your head before you typed it out for the entire internet to see?
What do you think CEOs do, sit on the computer running CAD/CAM software all day?
@@billstrasburg384 your stupidity is absolutely astonishing, look no further then Nvidia's CEO, my father is also another example. there is no "bachelor of CEO". the arrogance you exude whilst being simultaneously wrong is actually mind numbing. please take your own advice "Did that actually make sense in your head before you typed it out for the entire internet to see?"
@@billstrasburg384 No, but at least the decisions an honest engineering ceo makes, will come from a place of expertise. Besides, haven't you ever seen an engineering graduate with a degree in business administration???
@@billstrasburg384Do you honestly think a engineer can't be a CEO?? Former CEO of BP Oil is an engineer. My friend who is the CEO of his own company with 100 employees is an engineer.
🎉
A friend of mine is a 737 captain, flying both the NG and the MAX. He argues that for all of the peoblrms with the MAX, there isn't enough money to get him into the cockpit of a Scarebus, I mean Airbus.
He knows too many Airbus pilots who have told of situations where an A300 or A319/20/21 has done something that the pilots did not command the aircraft to do. It's the over-automation.
That’s why they are referred to among pilots as the Scarebus..
Most of this is due to lack of force feedback in the side stick. But that is gradually being phased out.
I’m sorry, who is all over the news every few months again , Boeing or Airbus ?
If it's Boeing, i ain't going
Pilots are gonna be getting spoiler alerts pretty soon
That's a good one😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂🤣😂🤣 Bravo!!
Im going to take a flight: 😄
Its a boeing plane: 🙂
Its the 737: 😰
max.: 💀
Stay home
Didn't they say, they removed the word "max", for some reasons? ;-)
So, when it's a 737-8 or 737-9, we know what it is... ;-)
Government is the problem.
Lol 🤣
Nah more like:
It is a Boeing plane: 😨
It is a 737: 😰
Max: 💀
Spoilers are not to slow the plane down. When spoilers are up, they do create drag which does slow the plane, however, pilots use spoilers to lower a plane’s altitude without pointing the nose down and increasing speed. The spoilers, spoil the air flow over the wings which decrease lift.
“If it’s Boeing, we’re not going” is my family’s motto.
I swear we waiting for another disaster to happen before someone actually takes action
Yes ...money. money money
Government needs to get out of it, and then Boeing can fix it as they should, If there even is a problem, government causes the problem with the regulations. Government just needs to get out of it, let the people who know how to build planes ,BUILD PLANES. Boeing is a fantastic American company.
@@juliemanarin4127 it’s not about money, it’s about power prestige in control the government employees want so badly, every FAA worker, as well as Joe Biden. They should all be held personally liable for the issues that they have caused.
@@BlindBiker3government is not stopping Boeing from making a good plane. You're nuts.
@@ED-es2qv that’s not nuts, ITS TRUTH! All it takes is to put the nightly news on to see the government and government employees are working against the people again, they always do. In this case, Boeing is a great American company who makes planes right, and they are trying to do their job, but FAA and FAA employees have decided that they don’t want Boeing anymore, they want boeing out of existence, and the employees done away with, FAA employees. Don’t want a prosperous America, they don’t want America to exist. In my own life, government has been very abusive, I live it every day, they are Heynis abusive evil sinister people. and all FAA employees failed America. FAA doesn’t know how to build airplanes, Boeing does, and they do it well. It’s government regulation the blocks them from making fantastic product, if any problem, and since the product is regulated, if something goes wrong, the FAA in regulators and employees should be at fault personally as well as Joe Biden personally. Boeing is a great company, let freedom fly.
That's 5 scandals just for the 737. We've got rudder hardovers, MCAS, panels falling off, engine failures, and now this.
just five more. and I got bingo.
What about the engine anti-ice that can't be turned on for more than 5 minutes or the engines take damage? (Okay that's probably the engine manufacturers fault but still ...)
And 2 dead whistleblowers
My brother works on those engines. It's the mount that's the problem, made by Boeing.
omg the MCAS...that was crazy.
It's not poor quality control.. It's criminal negligence.
They’re called Speed Brakes, and they’re meant to be deployed in flight to slow the plane down, there is an “ARM” Feature when it sees certain parameters they deploy anyway I don’t see what the big deal is 🙈
"If it's Boeing, I'm not going."
Original
Every plane of that type should be grounded until recertification by the FAA.
The only problem with that is, the FAA let's boeing certify their own planes. In a lot of ways, the FAA is just as guilty.
@@emaro6095yeah that got changed faa took that away from them.
They will just keep giving the FAA money under the table to cover it up
It takes 5-6 weeks to do a big check for a plane by a team of people. Almost Everything is taken out, whole inside, walls too, parts of the outside panels. Everything where cables, motors and electrical is going.
Engines too. It happens after a big number of hour and landings. It’s really something impressive to see. So imagine they have to do 1500 planes, you need 1/2 year and over 1000 certified people I guess?
Ignorant
- After takeoff checklist please
- Landing Gear?
- Retracted
- Flaps?
- Up, no lights
- Spoilers?
- Deployed
- WHAT??
- What?
The in flight spoilers will come up in flight in both the NG and the MAX if the yolk is turned sufficiently to do so. It is normal.
They just can’t seem to get it right
Let China make it right 😂
The "Dreamliner" is turning into a "Nightmare"!
@@TheOzthewizdifferent aircraft
Yeah, and now they found the whistleblower dead shot in the head in a hotel parking lot before he was getting ready to testify. Yeah cause that’s not suspicious at all.
@@postersm7141I mean it could still easily be explainable as suicide. Almost every family ever when interviewed following a loved one’s suicide says “oh they were doing so well. They never would have killed themselves.” So that’s not very unique. Also it’s not like this guy was the lynchpin to finding Boeing responsible. Their stock price has tanked due to all the incidents and recalls and whatnot. It wouldn’t make much sense to murder the guy at this point.
amazing how the 737-x00 planes are just better than the 737 maxes in literally every possible way
@@nickshawn11 It's not? The 737-400 already exists. It was part of the second generation of 737s.
@@nickshawn11
“The 737-400 design was launched in 1985 to fill the gap between the 737-300 and the 757-200, and competed with the Airbus A320 and McDonnell Douglas MD-80. It stretched the 737-300 another 10 ft (3.05 m) to carry up to 188 passengers.[13] It included a tail bumper to prevent tailscrapes during take-off (an early issue with the 757), and a strengthened wing spar. The prototype rolled out on January 26, 1988, and flew for the first time on February 19, 1988.
The aircraft entered service on September 15, 1988, with launch customer Piedmont Airlines (25 aircraft ordered).
The last two Boeing 737-400s, the last Boeing 737 Classics, were delivered to CSA Czech Airlines on February 28, 2000. The 737-400 was replaced by the 737-800 in the Boeing 737 Next Generation family.”
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_Classic
@@noahd.4551 it appears I was misinformed, thanks for the correction
Give me a 737-800 over a 737 MAX 8 anyday
Any x00 over the max. I'll even fly an old 707 or 727 when it's maintained well over any max series.
The problem is the media needs to have a story that grabs the attention of the public. All aircraft, at least commercial use flight spoilers to help turn the airplane. You can watch an airbus, and does the same thing as a Boeing with the flight spoilers deploying and flight.
I’ve logged hundreds of hours in the Max 8 and haven’t had a single problem. Very nice machine.
Yea it is fashionable to knock Boeing and the 737, I guess it generates clicks. I see lots of issues on the news that are "Boeing" problems that are actually poor maintenance or other manufacturers issues. Example if there is an engine problem on a Boeing aircraft it is not Boeing's fault, Boeing does NOT build engines. Wheels falling off, maybe the airline mechanics that serviced the aircraft should be scrutinized .
@@chuckwain5591 they are the ones assembling and selling the plane. Final QC round falls on them
@@konkeroufit's just like buying a new truck, alot of the truck manufacturers don't build their own powertrains(engines, transmissions, rear-ends). You have a problem, you take it to the dealership and blame the truck manufacturer, but it's actually who built the components that broke.
@@konkeroufwrong! Aircraft manufacturing is totally different than automotive. They build the plane and you purchase your choice of engines like RollsRoyce, GE, Pratt&whitney etc if the engine blows up in flight Boeing has absolutely nothng to do.
Thats because you have the Showroom Edition those never have issues.
Let's not forget that the MAX is the first 737 to get digital controls over the spoilers. I'm concerned now.
That's not a problem, it's a feature.
It scares the crap out of the pilots so they don't dare to fall asleep in the cockpit.
Black humor is oddly appropriate.
lol
😂
I studied flight safety in college. Today, it's all about Boeing, but we are rarely told about all other plane issues due to shoddy maintenance or design. Believe me, they happen, just not shown on the news in the united states.
did you pass the course?
Sad that Boeing ruined the 737.
The 737-300 (w/efis) were EXCELLENT and considered the "Sports Car of Commercial Jets".
When the CEO is not an engineer………….
CEO isn't a technical position, it's a business position. You obviously don't understand how companies work.
Bean counters and investor reps should not be on corporate boards. Boards should only be interested in long term corporate health - not investor relations.
@@bobbygetsbanned6049 Doesn’t seem to be working very well for Boeing, does it!
@@bobbygetsbanned6049 This guy is another angry hippie socialist who thinks that businessmen just sit around in gentlemens' lounges smoking cigars all day.
He sounds like Alexandria Occasional-Cortex.
@@iancormie9916 This 100%. Then you might argue why we've allowed institutional finance to chop up and extract so much wealth from these companies that provide so much for our everyday lives.
For the first time in my life Imma start checking what planes I fly on, and this one along with all other Boeings less than 20 years old are de facto excluded
"Fewer," and these are new planes
@@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823
Less than is fine. There was nothing to correct here. Grow up.
😂
This is what happens when the engineer CEO of Boeing gets replaced with an accountant.
Poor Airbus, they need to build another A32N plant. Boeing is just selling too much Airbus Jets
You’re aware that Airbus has its own issues as well, no?
Yes Airbus has big problems no doubt but let's be serious, Boeing is just in a FAR worse state currently. Even the usual quite pro Boeing FAA does acknowledge that Boeing is in an horrible situation
@@lachmowe1642Maybe because they are being subjected to a lower standard.
@@aycc-nbh7289they are corrupt now,they care about money more than safety of people riding it
I don't think they will ever recover from this kind of PR damage.
I think id be possible, if they get their shit done correctly and then just fade in the backround for some time. I think Boeing in general public would start to sound great again by itself because of litteral decades of building great planes, that shoud at least in my opinnion still be in the minds of quite a few people long terme. But i do not want to say it doesent hurt Boeing and it will take jears witout any mayor problems.
The airlines know more about the realities than an average person reading gossip news.. luckily..
Risking hundreds of passenger’s safety to save $415 is wild to think about. A lot of tickets on the plane are much higher than that
This corporate greed is ruining America in all aspects.
My friends were recently heading back from a class trip when suddenly their plane rolled out of nowhere during cruise. As the plane nerd in the group, they were wondering what happened, but I had no clue, since nothing like that had happened before on any of the flights I’ve ever been on. Now I know.
Can also be wake turbulence from another plane. Airbus’s made me spill my coffee a few times, suddenly our 737 just rolled, Airbus A319 in front. Tried this a few times..
Safety is a priority here at Boeing.😂😂
Source: trust me bro
Yes, right after profits, the number one priority.
Boeing CEO wasn’t even an engineer. He was a hedge fund guy. What else do I need to say?!? lol
Makes sense hedge funds are heavily based on risk. Bro is risking everyone's lives and the company name.
he just hedging his bets here.
100 dead passengers on your hands to save 415 bucks? Now that's a deal.
as an American, specifically from Detroit, I pride myself on my country’s manufacturing capabilities. American car manufacturers decided to make cheaper cars and foreign cars have come in and taken a large chunk of their marketshare. Would hate to see Boeing lose their grip on aircraft manufacturing but I’m afraid that is what we are witnessing
Air bus monopoly
greetings from germany
Correct. Airbus are going to become the world's leader
With all of the safety issues surrounding Boeing in the past decade, they lost their grip a long time ago. And certainly don’t deserve getting it back any time soon.
I saw this coming back in 1991 then it becomes a reality when McD/Douglas took over.
Boeing should use this to their advantage. They should show a photo of Everest and remind us that we climb for the adventure, for the risk. Show a photo of a roller coaster going down, and remind us why we ride it. Remind us why we watch horror movies. "Ride Boeing. Any other plane is just a ride. But with Boeing, it isn't just your destination. No, ON BOEING the thrill is the GOING!
You’re living in a strange world and you’re talking utter bollocks.
Shut up kid
Boeing fan boy 🤓🤓🤓
@@paulhough5941Sorry if this subtlety seems excessive, but this was my attempt at being factitious.
You could have a great career in advertising! That one is really good!
This happened A few times and has since been rectified.. It was a solenoid problem that would freeze while at altitude but would not show signs when inspected..not recent
Activation of the spoilers could indeed
be catastrophic during critical phases such as decision heights and flare. However, if the aircraft has sufficient altitude and the horizontal stabilizers can recalibrate, it might be manageable. The key concern is ensuring spoilers do not deploy during critical phases of flight where immediate control is crucial.
Coby, chill out! You saw what they did to the whistle blower 😂
Apparently kayak allows you to filter your search results by aircraft type.
Today, I just came back from an overseas business trip. My outbound journey started with a 787 (1.5 hour journey) and 350 (10 hour flight). The 350 was so quiet it felt gliding. The return flight was on 350 and 737max. Thank goodness I did not know about my last leg on a Boeing max, otherwise I would be thinking about the whole time, that I how much I trust Boeing.
Sorry to inform you, but spoilers are NOT used for stealing, they are used exclusively for slowing down the plane. It's the ailerons that control bank angle, the elevator that controls pitch, and the rudder that controls yaw.
Boeing has more recalls than my Kia
At least the Kia can't fall out of the road.
@@paulperry7091facepalm
movement that expires.
I’ve been saying after the door- check EVERY bolt and EVERY wire but these planes continue to fly. Keep rolling the dice. The shareholders approve.
The shareholders are getting bent over a barrel, lol. You think people are buying up Boeing stock? These decisions are BAD for making money.
Funny thing is the pilots are happy to fly them.
Yes, I am..
THIS is why I preferred cable links to flight control tabs for controls. And cables made the DC-9 a mean motor scooter. The most fun commercial aircraft I ever flew, for 4k of my 17k.
Thank god in Europe I can easily choose for an airline flying Airbusses.
You shouldn’t fly at all. You should also be concerned about your A321XLR having fuel tank issues.
@@papatango2362the A321XLR isn't even in service yet 😂
@papatango2362 wait till it’s certified to worry about safety
i thought you said airbussy for a second 💀
@@papatango2362i mean as an american, we should probably worry about our problems with the 737 MAX before judging others
i’m a huge boeing fan, but it’s clear that between the A320 family and the 737 family, the A320 might be a little superior when it comes to safety and public records
Riding on a MAX while it initiates a barrel roll... I'll pass
What, you don't like excitement and surprises?
The proper term is aileron roll.
@@derheeheehee6941
True.but still nothing remotely worth experiencing on that family trip to Disneyland with kids in tow.... CRINGE
Commercial aircraft made at the Boeing plant in the state of Washington are much different than the fighter aircraft and missiles made in St. Louis which is the old McDonnell Douglas plant.
If it’s Boeing, I ain’t going.
Can’t wait for the press to pick this up
They are gonna live this
and risk being su*cided in their hotel rooms?
It's not a new problem, and airlines already had to look for problems in all their MAX airplanes last summer. This is just the approved airworthiness directive to permanently fix the problem.
@@johnhaller5851 All the drama in narration added by Airbus
@billolsen4360 believe it or not Airbus and Boeing collaborate on safety.
I doubt either company would run campaigns to badmouth the other.
Guess that previous short of treating Boeing unfairly didn’t age well😬
Hahahahaha thank you!
I don’t see why, since the information there still holds true.
Don't be one of those people who is only influenced by the last person they heard from
nothing he said in that short was untruthful
This is why we need to think with more sophistication. It's not just a matter of "Boeing Bad" or "Boeing Good." They are at fault for a bunch of things, but not everything. You don't have to lie to make Beoing look bad.
"Safety is a priority here at boeing💀💀💀"
Something folks don't talk about, many of these planes sat in storage for years before being delivered.
It’s time to ground these planes until a full investigation is done and all complaints especially those from the individuals that worked at Boeing is resolved‼️If a worker that made these Aircraft’s feel unsafe to fly on them why would the general public 🤬
Cancel the program
Yep I agree
they can't cancel the program since it's already flying💀
@@PreCeptorBRthey mean cancel production
and the 737 MAX 7 and -10 aren’t in public service yet, so they can cancel that
@@Your_Local_NerdGiven the amount of orders they have especially for the MAX 8, it won’t be cancelled.
Forget about the program. Cancel Boeing as a whole
L1011, exellent plane, my favorite by far, over Boeing and Air Bus
If it ain’t an Airbus, then your plane is sus
I’m not flying on any airline that uses the max airplane family at this point.
What if your flight gets cancelled and you’re forced to book with another airline?
Remember those students forced to learn "The New Math" a while ago? You know, the math where it isn't important if you get the right answer as long as you understand the concept? Well, they have graduated and are now building airplanes at Boeing!!!
Best comment ever😂
It's not the engineers so much as it's the suits rushing out new planes before their known problems can be fixed.
I had no idea about that but i struggled in math all my life. I would get the right answer but my formulas were all goofy or something. So I kept failing cause my work was wrong but my answers were right, how tf does that make sense? Not til college that I was diagnosed with a learning disability in math only. Maybe I’m a “new genius” in reality! 😂😂😂 anyway, thanks for this, gonna look into it. ✌🏽🙃👍🏽
Someone doesn’t understand how math works…
It can be argued that understanding the concept is more important than simply answering some questions right.
Meanwhile my airline is like “let’s get more max 8s! 🥳”
American can never say anything about Chinese manufacturing when we have plan that are literally falling out of the sky.
Yeah that right is for us Europeans only now you’re right
Nooo please be fair. As a fan of Airbus I would trust Boing a 1000 times over cheap chinese build crap
@@steuererhoehung what Chinese built planes are failing like Boeing? I’ll wait and you can barely name any American made thing because America doesn’t make anything and the few things it does make is crap!
This isn’t strictly a Boeing problem in their defense, I personally think they should go out of business, but the FAA needs to be punished severely also
I haven’t flown in a plane in the last five years. I do not miss it.
Boing is done. Every airline who’s still buying their planes is insane.
The 737 MAX 8, 9, 10 are the 3 types of aircraft that will definitely lead to Boeing's Downfall
Don't forget about the dreamliner that liked to catch itself on fire due to the batteries...boeing is a disaster right now and it bums me out being a Renton native and seeing these beautiful machines on a daily basis. Corporate greed has ruined it for me.
Facts 🔥🔥
Much safer than a Tupolev 😂
It's so wild...Boeing used to be the plane we trusted most!!
Regulations work, and are necessary.
When the FAA is in Boeing’s pocket, there are no regulations.
Quality control for Boeing is so bad, their employees are dying... unrelated of course.
Bro the southwest b737 you showed in the vid was a b737-800 not max
Click baiter don't care about accuracy, they're just greedy.
@@billolsen4360 yes I agree
He's an idiot.
So there's NO spoiler issue?
car manufacturers issue recalls for every little problem , but airliner manufacturers try to hide major issues
I am a TSA Officer in a large airport in Texas, words of advice DONT FLY UNLESS ITS A MEDICAL EMERGENCY OR FAMILY DEATH! Vacation is not worth your life TRUST ME! Ive seen Mechanics in the employee Bus forget to put parts on a plane, they have it in their work gear pockets and say " Oops " REALSTORY!
Bro boeing is my favorite aircraft type seeing this is sad asf
Same bro 😢
I think boeing needs new rewiring system for the whole plane now
@@baekhyunexofan747 I agree... they should remake the 737 or replace it with the 797
Would that be a 747 replacement
I mean 747 my fav plane
@@baekhyunexofan747 the 777x is the 747 replacement
737 max= a flying coffin 💀
I don’t see how if they have been subject to increased safety standards ever since the first grounding. If this happened with an Airbus plane, no one would bat an eye.
I mean not really. Hundreds of these planes take to the air every day with zero issues and there hasn't been an incident since 2019 that caused any deaths so... No. Boeing needs to get it's crap together and fix these issues before they happen but again, it's not that bad.
And… the incidents that did happen were primarily due to the pilots not flying airplane. Step one in any non-normal situation.
I flew in a 737 Max and it was one of the most comfortable flights I have ever taken. Turbulence was not felt.
It’s terrifying waiting every day for the next disaster to happen, knowing one of us may be the victim.
Apparently everyone’s a aviation engineering expert I’d like to see you build a plane.
If it’s Boing I ain’t going
What if you get a last-minute cancellation or equipment change that forces you onto a Boeing plane?
CEO cutting costs to line his pockets go figure