The Current State of The Star Citizen 4.0 Roadmap
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- While CIG is still saying Star Citizen 4.0 is only a few months away, there is always the chance for delays or new additions. We take a brief look at what is still planned for the new update as of the end of July 2024.
Other Reactions: • Space Tomato Reacts
Audio Podcast: anchor.fm/laun...
Support me:
Patreon: / spacetomato
Paypal: paypal.me/Spac...
Giveaways: www.spacetomat...
Discord & Org
Join THE GARDEN: / discord
Join GII: gii.spacetomat...
Start a Star Citizen account with 5000 extra credits in your pocket with the link or the referral code below.
Jointomato.com
#starcitizen #spacetomato #update
So they released an update right before this video went live!
The Zeus CL, new caves, new space station activities, and asteroid facilities are also tentative to be added in this update!
Hey man, I think you make some of the best videos on Star Citizen. I really enjoy your Informed, Chill vibes. Keep up the good work.
Have you joined Garden Interstellar Initiative?
I’ve been in countless orgs and never had any fun. All training and waiting.
Once I joined Gii I’ve had more fun in Star Citizen than I have since the beginning.
It would be really cool if they had a space station that could be reconstructed and brought online by players.
It would be really cool if they had an actual game. The so called big patch with Pyro.... to be honest Pyro is already old and we pretty much have seen it and still no actual gameplay in sight.
@@derjadebaum9159 No one ever specifies what they mean by "a game"
02:04 RSI Orion??? NVM 2016 presentation. I guess they all blend together when you hear the same thing for years on end.
I melted my Orion, BMM and few others, totally impractical, im not planning of being a store keep, nor taking on another day job just to mine space rocks in a ship that can't land planetary. Not only that, just look what has to be inplace for the Orion to exist?, my fleet now consists of ships with no more than a 6 crew requirement, an a couple exceed that.
Secondly we have a more realistic expectation of seeing even the Endeavor in game in 2+ yrs, now that CIG have endless HULL assets, because that's basically the Endeavor...a Hull ship, modulation is sorted, we will have 2 systems, and CIG has the largest pool of devs devoted to SC than ever before, and thirdly, the game will be so much more advanced and feature rich come may/2025. Yet saying that, do i have a CCU to an ORION.....of course it do, you never know, even the Zeus CL is now slated for a 2024 release!.
Modularity is sorted?
Cool I’m gonna log in and set up the custom modules on my Caterpillar.
@@jbirdmax C'mon wake up dopey, i already did that last week...noobs
@@jbirdmax That's modulation for current and concept ships, not the sesame st animal relics.
@@davewills6121 it’s called sarcasm derp. Modularity isn’t even being worked on yet.
You simpletons see different variants of ships and just assume.
Enjoy your vacation Mr. and Mrs. Tomato!
Its been interesting to see all content creators getting more critical of SC - there is only so many unfulfilled promises before people finally have had enough.
4.0 is this big important step for SC, but I find I am completely underwhelmed by it, I think it’s because it has been so long coming and so heavily talked about that it’s got old. I am sure I will enjoy it when it arrives but at the moment I find myself assuming it will be broken or delayed. I was strangely more interested in the non pyro dependent stuff in 4.0 while watching this.
Yeah same. I hardly care anymore.
Thank you for your work and time you put into these videos! I hope the game comes together soon! Passionate fans like you and your community deserve it! Fingers crossed 🤞🏼 that 3.24 is the beginning of the golden age of SC!
Tomato you do a great job, funny to hear you starting to sound like us older backers. Calling the bs on the spot, not letting it cook like most do.
I've never believed that 4.0 will be out this year. My guess is Q1 2025.
Q2 2025 at very earliest
Q4
2026.
Q6 or Q7 2024
lol, Q2 2026 at least
So much is going to change before 2025???? This is one hell of a ride!
Keep dreaming
I love how they list The Orion and Crucible for 4.0 and they haven't started working on either 8 years later, Hell they haven't even started on working on ship repair for the Crucible.
I really like your content, very good diversity and you seem to have very good sources. Keep it up!
They have talked about Nyx a lot, Nyx could be ready to go with Pyro. Possibly Terra too.
not gunna happen. #copium
Nope, it will be Pyro, Nyx, Magnus. These are the Sq42 systems that are linked by gates that connect to Stanton. Gate travel will tell u the next systems coming along with SQ42 systems.
Btw not together just order. They have talked about all these systems more than others and said gates are the key to whats next for us.
8 years, crazy.
Let's hope SQ42 will have been worth this crazy delay.
It’s so good we’ve barely seen any footage. Lol.
@@rolinthorand yet they just now got eva and flightmodel down
Great video! I think 4.0 will be at least Server Meshing, the rest is all optional. Think about it, even for Server Meshing multiple systems aren't a requirement, since they ran tests for it solely in Stanton as well ;).
So my advise to all is: Temper your expectations and take that release/feature view with a bucket full of grains of salt. Let them surprise you instead of disappoint you.
"Pyro V" might be accurate if they use the numbers to replace how modern-day astronomy names planets, which would be "Pyro b" if it was the first planet discovered in this star system.
Your content is gold. Keep it up!
Also, I find that you often give voice to how I feel about the development. Both the ups and the downs. Don't let the negative nancy's in the comments make you think you need to change your content. Even negative comments are engagement in the eyes of the all-powerful algorithm.
Space Tomato don't forget CIG shrunk Pyro. It isn't as big as they first concepted it.
What kills me is when all this was discussed last OCTOBER they said this is all reasonable in the next year. Here we are 9 months later still do not have 2/3rd of what was promised. Now they are saying the next few months. Why didn't they just say we don't intend to actually release any of this for AT LEAST another year. Getting real tired of them gaslighting us.
are they planing on scaling up stanton to the original scale ? if pyro is so big? they might scale up stanton then...
Oh don't tease me with the crucible....
I feel like they would make better progress if they weren't so focused on saving shit for citcon. Maybe I'm wrong but it feels like a way for them to just lie because they need something big and flashy to show off.
I'd imagine Covid created a challenge and a massive delay to both SC and SQ42. It's one thing to say work from home, but that's near impossible when you need to create a server software, server messing design would have been near impossible. To say nothing about the lose of life Covid caused, we've no idea how it affected CIG. So yea with regard to 4.0 delay they get a pass in my book.
Covid and its impact was way, way before any of these statements were made. It's not a valid excuse.
The move to the UK was worse. They lost all their great talent.
The move was a symptom of a problem.
That problem wasn't solved.
I dont need an uninterrupted universe as I dont care what happens on the other end, and doing quantum drive is pretty much a loading screen that lasts for several minutes, I think they are chasing something that is not really necesarry
thats 100% wrong but ya they are moving way too slow
you know that you can't play the game during load screens, while the game can't also play you?
"just say 1 star system"..... 🤣🤣🤣....facts 💯
Well, we know a lot of this tech should be out. We know a lot of these systems have LONG been worked on, we know they are building up to the Orion and Crucible via other ships. Which is great. So to say he didnt meet these intents is not true. To say the company isnt releasing the content is true.
Pyro 5 being the 4th planet makes sense and isn't that funny. Pyro (the star) should be the first thing in the system. That follows normal naming conversations.
The basics are a mess with unnecessary complexities. Controls, keybinds, flight modes, just overly complex and bug ridden. Ffs, take some leanings from Microsoft Flight Simulator, DCS, Elite Dangerous, why reinvent the wheel for the absolute basic necessities. As a returning player that was there at the start, their basics have gone backwards. Amazingly beautiful beautiful game, but I can't be stuffed spending hours upon hours on controls, neither can most newbies.
True, controls and keybindings need a huge refactor and simplification. And not only the defaults should be better, but creating custom layouts should also be so much easier to do.
Honestly the controls are great, for me it’s immersion. And a skill level with a game like this with controls I think is very important, provides more equity in every experience.
Sure, everything you mention is possible if they started with a pre-made engine, but they started from nothing. I honestly like the controls and keybinds for how customizable it is. I don't know why that's your major complaint tbh. You can simplify everything as well of that's what you want
If you happen to like the defaults, that's great. I can tell you, I've done multiple setups to use a 3d mouse, xbox controllers, etc. And it's a pain in the ass. The UI is bad, there's no blueprints so you have to modify the same stuff over and over for camera, ship, eva, turret, fps...
The names of each control are sometimes quite hard to discern.
Different people have different preferences as to what each stick or button should do, and the game needs a proper way to customize it. Even an arena commander mode dedicated to it.
The current format and xml comes directly from the cry engine, and is not up to the task for SC.
One of the issues with everything being approved by one person above all others.
The over engineering of _________ (fill in the blank) in Star Citizen is staggering.
Let's see how long it really will take for 4.0. I somehow don't believe this year is realistic.
Yay!
And for this 4.0...not one Crucible on the Horizon...
Sure, 4.0 can come this year, but at this rate it won't be a quality game until 7.5 or so.
At current Evo speed the 4.0 looks like it needs to be delayed. But I think they still push it out but it will be bad.
Big problems are the persistent hangars and elevators. Cargo “works” but needs some tuning.
But no persistent hangar = no new cargo missions.
Honestly I think it's only critically important that they get Pyro and functional Server Meshing out. That's really what faith in the project depends on. If they can get those two things out in a good state, everything else can be forgiven.
Most likely they push it out to the test servers and let it bake for 4 months or so before pushing it ti live.
SpaceTomato sounds a bit deflated.
It's like going to do a job you hate.
Shit, i know that felling.
He deos work for cig in a way
They should prioritize server stability, optimization and fixing glitches/bugs.
Edit: If they did that I'd be more willing to spend money the game.
Server stability, optimization, and a better reason to play the game instead of earning Auec to buy outdated ships... in my book atleast
8 years already since that annoucement of 4.0 ? ... .... I didn't see time pass, all in the blink of an eye ! How disappointing, is it really that hard to make ? So many people working at it for so many years and still ...
It hasnt been worked on for 8 years
Yes, it is that hard to make.
4.0 announcement was basically done after 3.0
That's how numbers work, they did 3, so they announced 4.
It didn't represent a timeline, or a number a features. They just set 4.0 to be server meshing with Pyro.
They've added a looooot of other things in the meantime.
And I'm sure there's still a lot of years to come. And that is fine.
What are you disappointed about? Just go play another Sim with equal scope and fidelity and immersion and depth of gameplay.
Oh wait.... you can't. The only game that comes close is No Mans Sky because Star Citizen is the only game attempting it at this level of believability. 😂
@@Captain_Alkamisunk cost fallacy at its finest 🤡
you waited 6 years, you are gonna wait another 6
I feel like conditions are better than the last few
I'm actually sick of 4.0 already and sick of pyro and I haven't even been there yet
Need a gate for wormholes. Will never forgive them for that
Traval to MULTIPLE Star Systems,
Multiple means..
Having more than one and usually several of something,
So they mean 2 systems Lol
Had this since 2013, and its terrible tech demo, nothing works. everything is broken, seems like the game is being made by children with no understanding of games
Why are you talking so negatively about Star Citizen? :(
Yeah... 4.0 is not coming this year.
CIG is rushing and cutting corners to get it out.
Roadmap or Roadwreck?
EVE online cost around $80 million (adjusted for inflation) to develop. Death Stranding cost around $174 million to develop. Skyrim $85 million. GTA $265 million. CIG is a pathetic joke if all they have is this empty shell of a tech demo.
bunch of numbers that mean nothing, the next big step in gaming is gonna be slow and painful, but sit down, stfu, and enjoy it when it gets here
Which GTA? because 6 (yet to release) has cost something like 2 billion dollars 1.3 Billion more than Star Citizen.
Your opinions are milktoast
@XMathiasxX hahahahaha surely not
You've complained a lot recently. You say it's ridiculous. I say if it was easy, it wouldn't be taking so long. The air of entitlement is off-putting quite honestly.
It may take a classroom of engineers to design something half as strong as one experienced, expert engineer. Humans are not fungible