Russia vs NATO [Military Power Comparison]
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- As of 2022, NATO had approximately 3.37 million active military personnel compared with 1.35 million active military personnel in the Russian military.
Subscribe Now - ⚔️ goo.gl/pY8ZSL ⚔️
#Russia #NATO #MilitaryComparison
------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to Our Military Channel - Military Weapons.
Here You Can Find Everything About Military - Military Reviews of weapons, Information about Armed Forces of Countries, Comparison of weapons, military vehicles and equipment, Military Operations and much more interesting!
We are sure, that all the fans of #MilitaryWeapons will find here something related to their interests.
⚔️ goo.gl/pY8ZSL ⚔️
Remember that these are not toys :)
------------------------------------------------------
Our Social Media:
Facebook - goo.gl/4qiHyZ
------------------------------------------------------
Military Comparison || Military Weapons
• Military Comparison
![Iran vs Azerbaijan [Military Power Comparison]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0ntN3_PTyTg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Iran vs Azerbaijan [Military Power Comparison]](/img/tr.png)
![Iran vs Turkey [Military Power Comparison]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ItnY8sG4bzc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Greece vs Turkey [Military Power Comparison]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/K5_6PPypyyo/mqdefault.jpg)
BTW, about the nukes, here the more accurate number:
ruSSia 6,257
NATO *6,065*
_(*USA - 5,550, France - 290, UK - 225.)_
Damm so many triggered russia fans here what a comment section 🍿
Russia scared of NATO
no.
@@user-tx1lw8zh9o LOL, yes
Nato usa acraid russis
All those weapons of war and military personnel and the Afghanistan war machine sent both nations packin! 🤨
They forgot to mention how many nations in Nato. Thirty. Coalition warfare. Big problem for coalition.
the allies in ww2 did a pretty good job
Rest of the world's nuclear vs Russian nuclear.
If it goes nuclear there are no winners anyway and that's the only thing they have more of. If they use it they lose just as much as anyone else. In everything else Russia is inferior numerically and as we've seen in Ukraine they are also inferior in quality in every way. Half there shit is just that .... er shit!
In all seriousness destroying planet earth is not a victory.Imagine the only way you could win a fight is if you both die.
Only 20 launched from each side would destroy all of us, so the left numbers are pointless
ruSSia has no any chance against the super-mighty Alliance NATO. Plus, when we search for reputable sources, we find that the numbers presented in this video vary, e.g.: about the nukes number.
3:32 📍
In the air & sea, otan have a Huuge advantage
Ok if nato have 30 members russia have China, north korea, iran egypt lybia serbia iran india indonesia whole south america belarus africa
Is that a joke? 😂China no longer supports Russia in the Ucranian war (they had their own issues after all) Serbia doesn´t support the Russian illegal adhesions of the Ucranian provinces, India does neither, Indonesia the same. So you have only left North Korea, Iran (whilst it´s in the break of a revolution against the current regime) and, did you say lybia? LOL And Whole South America? Are you high on something? Not even Cuba sdupported the anexion of the Ucranian territories by Russia 🤣
@@antoniolopez2322 Yea I think he spun his own anti-NATO fanfic in his head, but doesn't know anything about the current politics 🤣Also to add on what u already mentioned, the only defense treaty Russia is in is the CSTO which consists of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan. So in the case of NATO being the aggressor only these countries are obliged to actually help russia, which is already pretty pathetic in comparison to NATO. And if Russia is the aggressor literally no one would ally with them anyway as u can already see from the current shifts in politics and opinions from even the closest 'friends' of Russia
As See Above Russia Is Like Half NATO 💪😎.
NATO ==30 Members 😂. WHAT IF THEY COME AS ONE STATE AS RUSSIA :
Esle :..............
Russia consist of one Country, true.
But NATO comes as 30 members with America as there only Military. (The other members just take advantage of America)
NATO is an obsolete peace of crap leach that just sucks the recourses from its members, specifically America.
We need to face the facts and see the world as it really is.
Then let the world pay for its own problems and leave America alone.
That says only one thing. Russia is aggressive country which invest a lot of its money into military because they want to use force and to impose own will with brute force and brutality unlike EU countries which invest very little in military but I hope things gonna change now. EU should make largest military to ensure any threat is neutralised in matter of days.
Cry kid, on this video is all wrong, russia has more tanks, artillery, rocket projectors, and more weapons
@@mitjamatic761 Keep in mind it is Russia, so most of nukes either don't work anymore, have no fuel, some are in the records but has been stolen (like many armoured vehicle were sold as scrap but still visible under records ). If you know russian reality you know how it goes.. If 50% of military in records is still working its good for russia, but I don't think that's possible.
@@mitjamatic761 but they don't have toilettes... that is why they steal them from ukrainians... that is why they invaded ukraine... hahaha the russians are an joke in the west... sarmat sarmat... :D obviously they will never use that... because... ;) we know the answer...
Russia would get dismantled by air... unless they go nuclear then it's another ball game...
🔫 Pium Pium
is this including USA in NATO? the numbers dont seem right unless US Forces are just the vast majority of NATO power
I think us is included
Bro, it shows 1 trillion military investment 😂 USA is surely included
This video has quite a few wrong mistakes. NATO has a vast technological/economic advantage. Not even a Russia-China coalition would be a match nowadays. And countries like Japan, the third largest economic power, are not in the NATO, but are allies. Same for South Korea, Australia...
Russia also has China, North Korea & Iran.
China will not fight for Russia
Nato also has Australia,Japan,Saudi Arabia,South Korea and India
It's not a contract alliance. Alliance has responsibilities.
Glory to Ukraine & its so brave heroic People 💖. The Ukrainians are true Heroes!
Obviously ruSSia is much weaker than the unglorious putinets try to propagandistically advocate, in vain. One of the many proofs of ruSSia's weakness is Ukraine. The super-Ukrainian patriots are teachers ruSSia _(and the whole world)_ a GREAT lesson.
Who fears ruSSia?? Only chickens do! 🐔🐔🐔
Glory to the Ukrainian patriots! 💞
_(*Thank You[s] much for everything... The whole civilized world owes You.)_ 😚
The whole civilized world isn't on board against Russia and it is a certainty the war in Ukraine is not benefitting every breathing human being.
Get up off your knees in worship of men, there is no eternal salvation in warmongers or waging wars, there's only misery, pain, suffering death and degradation.
Путин нагнул Европу)))))
What a shame almost the whole word and still can’t beat Russia 😅
Says who? Russia? They're defeatable
You mean russia cant even beat a backwater slavic country like Ukraine lmao, how the heck are they supposed to last more than two days against NATO?? Or any independent/neutral modern western nation? In a straight fight russia's army suck, all bling on paper but dysfunctional cannonfodder on the field. 😆
Any country is beatable. Even the Ukrainian Military are giving Russia a very hard time
why should we beat russia ... if ukraine is enough... :D
Let’s be real Russia has way more submarines and way more nukes😂
Keep in mind it is Russia, so most of nukes either don't work anymore, have no fuel, some are in the records but has been stolen (like many armoured vehicle were sold as scrap but still visible under records ). If you know russian reality you know how it goes..
even 300 are enough to destroy even the russian tundra... so what is the point to have more... :D
Dear sir, accordingly to this video, submarines:
ruSSia 70, NATO 156.
About nukes, many other reputable sources say differently, with US''s numbers much proximate to ruSSia's.
BTW, about the nukes, here the more accurate number:
ruSSia 6,257
NATO *6,065*
_(*USA 5,550, France 290, UK 225.)_
lol;most subs are outdated and in bad condition
Russia is not alone, we are by his side, here is Iran 🇮🇷
ایران ایولا
Iran is a joke.
We scared 😴Zzzzz
Oh no we are so scared
Iran XD
🇨🇳🇷🇺🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷👊👊👊👊
Nato has under 3000 MLRS less than Russia and less Artillery with 12000 than russia 14000. Never in the world has nato 23000Tanks
Since NATO has overwhelming Air Dominance, Russian Artillery is useless anyways so it doesn't even matter.
Dont forget Russia have the best Air-Defence Systems over 4000 included under 2000 S 300.
@@lutzebersberger9561 buhahahahaha best air defence systems... :D the us rockets sure penetrate well... ;) the himars... ;) and they are not... hyper sonic... hahahaha
@@powervr read the national interest. They are the best in the Word.
Russian tanks, artillery, airplanes, have proven to be made of tin
🇨🇳🇷🇺🇮🇷👊👊👊👊👊👊
🇮🇷🤝🏻🇷🇺⚘⚘
😂😂😂 usa +nato + israel byebye russie iran avec INTERDICTION DU nucleaire no game avec alliance ONU
Russia is best 💪💪
Keep saying that bot
S-400 & S-300v4 ,patsir ,tor ,buk alone sufficient for NATO airforce