NEW Full-Cast Harry Potter Audiobooks with 100 Actors Coming in 2025!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 апр 2024
- Just A few days ago, out of nowhere some new Harry Potter news apparated in. Audible, in collaboration with Pottermore Publishing, has unveiled plans to release a brand-new series of Harry Potter audiobooks, with a magical twist. Unlike traditional audiobooks, these will not be narrated by a single person. Instead, we're getting a full-cast audio production! Yes, you heard that right - all seven books are being transformed, and they're set to launch in late 2025!
Want to support the channel?
Consider joining my Patreon: / capturedinwords
PayPal Me: paypal.me/CapturedinWords
Consider donating on Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/capturedinwords
My Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.ca/hz/wishlist/ls/...
Join the Discord server!: / discord
Join the subreddit!: / capturedinwords
SUBSCRIBE TO THE 2ND CHANNEL | The Sunshine Seekers: / @thesunshineseekers
Where to find me:
Twitch: / capturedinpixels
Instagram: captured.in...
Twitter: / captured_words
TikTok: / capturedinwords
Want to send me something? Here's my PO Box address:
Jay Kennedy
PO Box 21163
Kelowna RPO Orchard Park, BC, V1Y 9N8
Canada 
Развлечения
Captured in Words starting a new Fantasy News show ? Goblin's got competition!
A page-perfect production of Harry Potter as an unabridged anime series is my dream.
I have never wanted something to exist so badly until this moment! That would be amazing
@@CapturedInWords Okay, The full dream of mine, sit down first, Studio Ghibli presents The Unabridged Harry Potter, I have a slightly used soul to trade to make this happen.
If you are going to dream, dream EPIC. lol
/sigh back to booktube in search of the next tome to beguile my senses. Your videos kick ass BTW.
Harry Potter is what got me into reading and has made me who I am today!
I’m very excited!! I’m definitely a fan of Jim Dale’ narration. I used to listen to the CDs in my car. 👀 😂
Love Jim Dale's narration! 🙌😁
@@CapturedInWords I prefer Stephen Fry's narration. I wonder why it's available in the US and Canada now and not earlier. anyway, I hope you'll make a video about why your family prevented you from reading the Harry Potter books.
@@SharpAsRavenClaws Jim Dale does a really annoying voice for Hermione. 'Haweeeee'
Stephan Fry version was pretty good.
@@louwinters508 yup
I like both, but Stephen Fry gives the OG british book which I do prefer as that's who JK intended it to be.
I grew up on Jim Dale but I prefer the Stephen Fry version. I think it's great to have 2 versions to pick from and soon to be 3 makes for multiple experiences for revisits to Harry Potter
I'm actually quite stoked for this~ I've always loved listening to radio dramas and GraphicAudio audiobooks ^_^
This is awesome news! And totally agree with your comments on Jim Dale vs. Stephen Fry. Both are great, but I prefer the range of Dale.
A part of me would love to see both of them come back for this version. Have Fry do the paragraph narration for example, and give Dale a prominent role.
@@robertgronewold3326 That’s a great idea and pays homage to both.
For the most part I agree with you. In a situation like this, or movie remakes, we (people in general) tend to latch onto what we knew first as, the "real thing".
That idea holds so well for me with this series. I knew the movies before the books.
And so Dale's readings had built in latch on appeal, as several of his voices seem heavily based on actors from the movies, which provided an immediate familiarity.
Add into that, I am North America based so I was largely excluded from the Fry audio books until very recently.
But, we occasionally revisit the audio books while on extended bits of driving, and it is fun that there is a new player in our old game of, "I like the way they did this part better in...: movies vs. books"
Not always a straight line comparison since obviously the story itself does not translate exactly from book to movie.
Still, it is a fun diversion at times and, "film vs. Dale vs. Fry" promises hours of rainy day silliness ahead.
I'm so excited for this! I'm partial to Jim Dale, myself, as his version of OOTP is what I listened to to lull myself to sleep every night for years as a young teen. But now I'm an adult with four bookish kids who LOVE Audible. Sharing this with them is going to be like experiencing the magic of HP for the first time all over again!
Love your videos! Definitely going to have to check out the new audiobooks as I am a big fan of the Jim Dale Narration!
Excellent. I enjoy still listening to His Dark Materials that were narrated by the author and voice acted. This is going to live or die on that one character portrayal you just won't be able to get past as doing it 'wrong'
I'm very much looking forward to this. A full cast version is something I've wanted for quite a long time as well.
Looks like we're all going to be re-listening to the books in 2025! 😀
Looking forward to trying these! Exciting!!
I can't wait! 😊
The first time I found Mistborn in any format was the graphic audio version and it was great. And tbh amazons production values blow them out of the water so I’m incredibly excited.
Interesting news 🗞️ happy reading to you!! 😊
Yay! That's great news!
This was great news, I can wait!! Wands ready wizards and witches.
so ready for this. ive read the series 5+ times, watched the movies countless times and still cant get enough of it
Definitely Stephen Fry!
About time GraphicAudio became mainstream.
Hey man, first of all, I don't usually comment but I love your content and your videos, specially the way you edit them with moving images related to the fantasy story and world you are usually talking about. I would like to know where do you get these types of images? I know sometimes you just have an art of the world with some filter along with it (for example snow if the art is displaying a snowy landscape) but I know sometimes it's just the art itself that is moving like a GIF (like the one of the Stromlight Archive that you used in this video).
Hope you can answer to my question. Anyways, I am very happy with this piece of news and agree with most of your points about the audio formats. I also love the Jim Dale alot more because I also think he has a more range than Stephen Fry. I do love Stephen Fry, he is a wonderfull feller. I just prefer Jim's voices and ambience at the end of the day.
I get most of the artwork from Artstation :) then I add in the movement and overlays of snow, fire, dust, or particles etc.
Sometimes in after effects I'll make a slideshow with the art with ink drop transitions, parallax effects, or other stuff. But for the artwork that is actually animated like a gif, I just find it online. For instance the Stormlight Archive art is an animated wallpaper that I found on reddit: www.reddit.com/r/Stormlight_Archive/comments/cpv8bc/animated_wallpaper_the_way_of_kings/
Hope that helps!
How exciting. I can’t wait to hear it. Been thinking about rereading the series and this might be the best way to do so now. For myself at least.
I will happily stay with the Stephen Fry narration I already have.
Also I dont care for sound effects, because I listen to audiobooks on way higher speeds which means the sound effect don't work anymore.
But for anyone who does love it, happy to have more options again. Seems like they are doing it right this time.
Awesome! Will be listening to it.
Can't wait!!
I’ve listened to both Dale and Fry. Love both, but Fry is by far my favourite. Very much looking forward to this full cast version. 🎉
What mic is that?
Where are the artworks at 0:54 from please?
Those are the Thai special edition covers for the books, and they are GORGEOUS. For several years now people have wanted them released on the English editions.
@@robertgronewold3326 I see. The Thai editions of Wizard of Earthsea are also gorgeous.
I LOVE the idea. I hope it’ll succeed.
Can't wait for these newer audiobooks.
There was a bbc version of Narnia like this and i loveed it so im looking forward to this new audible version
I have only listened to Stephen Fry, but I love him.
Hope this is not dramatization but full books.
It's going to be unabridged, so it will have the full text and everything :) but will be dramatized in the way that it will add sound effects and music and stuff
@@CapturedInWords Excellent. Can't wait 😀
Sounds amazing!
I'm really looking forward to it!
I LOVE GraphicAudio. Especially Bradley Smith as Wayne, he's stolen my heart❤
These sound amazing.
This is big news, especially for kids just coming to it. It’s pretty amazing that they’ll have a full cast AND the sound effects. I’ll have to make sure to get both the Dale and Fry versions. I too was sneaking and listening to the Jim Dale version for that same reason. 😂 I prefer Jim Dale’s overall narration and voices(and that’s how all the characters sound in my head), but Stephen Fry’s voice just feels like a warm blanket and cup of tea. I will definitely be listening to the new ones, though. Say what you want about Rowling, this series changed the world. I was a teen when it started and didn’t start them until my senior year of high school. I’ve been a huge reader my entire life, but I’d never read anything like it before. Harry Potter and Percy Jackson were how I discovered that I loved middle grade fiction, even though I was way out of the demographic by then.
I get your nostalgia, I know it hurts, but Harry Potter isn't even that great of a series and we can't keep supporting it. Did it change the world? Sure. But we can't keep prete ding we can separate art from the transphobic author Rowling and her influence in politics anymore when it's actively harmful to a group of marginalized people. There are better books to read for young kids nowadays AND for adults who grew up with Harry Potter. Examples: Nevermoor, Witchlings, Hedgewitch, Not Your Sidekick, Ghost Squad, When You Trap a Tiger, Amari and the Night Brothers, etc., or even some other classics of the time, like percy jackson.
You can even look up the own-voices initiative by Riordan himself, where he highlights Middle grade books written by marginalized authors.
@@nitzeart No, YOU can’t separate the art from the artist. I am perfectly able to. If it makes you uncomfortable, don’t read it. But I’m an adult and I can read what I choose by any author I choose. I have read and enjoyed the other series as well. J K Rowling’s opinions are just that, her opinions. Your opinions are yours. Mine are mine. You also need to learn what active harm is. She’s not holding anyone at gunpoint, she’s just talking. She hasn’t, to my knowledge, physically attacked anyone. Just stop listening to her, if her opinions upset you. You can actively prevent yourself from ever reading or hearing anything she says. Or do what I do, and live your life without being so chronically online that someone merely saying things you don’t like equates to actual harm to you. And stop giving imperfect authors the power to affect your feelings. There is nothing she can say that will affect my world opinions. She is one of 8.5 billion people. In the large scheme of things, none of our opinions, including yours, have that much weight in the world. You’d be astonished at how easy it is to mind my own business and let other people think what they want. I’m a Black woman in America. Someone can say the most racist thing in the world, and it’s not going to affect my sense of self or my opinions. They’re entitled to their opinion, even if I don’t agree. Their opinion has nothing to do with me. Someone you don’t know saying something you don’t like doesn’t equate to physical harm, and it shouldn’t equate to emotional harm either. Acting like it does is an insult to and dismissive of people who actually are victims of abuse.
@Tinahgirl83 My guy, I've read Orson Scott Card* I'm perfectly capable of separating the art from the artist if I want to. But Rowling and her friends are actively pushing discriminatory politics in the UK. Which WILL influence the rest of the world. Have fun not having empathy tho
@@nitzeart I’ll do you the courtesy of actually addressing what you said, though you ignored most of my comment in favor of the one idea you chose to fasten on.
1. You tell me you read Orwell, but apparently what you read didn’t leave any sort of impression on you, as you’re basically attacking me based solely on the fact that I don’t have the same opinion on reading a book as you do. Animal Farm and 1984 are both largely about the problems that come when people in society are no longer allowed to think for themselves and are forced into conformity to one set of ideals or another. You use all the current catchphrases, and ignore basically everything else I said to fasten on one thing. The words groupthink and doublethink come to mind, as does the sentiment that your thought is correct and anyone who doesn’t think as you do is completely wrong. You have the perfect freedom to pick and choose to read from authors you deem problematic, while in the same sentence telling me I’m wrong for doing exactly that same thing, because I’m not doing it the way you want. How do you not see the hypocrisy? “Rules for thee, but not for me.” I would also direct you to Fahrenheit 451. That, mixed with both Animal Farm and 1984, as well as critical thinking and analysis will hopefully impress on you that there should be no room for hive mind or “Big Brother” type thinking, where the other person is wrong and needs to be policed/controlled simply because they don’t agree with you on how to handle a situation. They don’t agree with your actual opponent either, but that part doesn’t matter because all you’re concerned about is perfect conformity to the group you’re a part of. You throw certain words at people and expect them to just fall in line with what your ideologies are.
2. I will refer you to my previous comment. I do not let random strangers in the internet tell me what to think or how to live. I go out into the world and interact with real people and form my opinions based on person to person interactions. I don’t immediately write off a person if they say something I don’t agree with. I don’t lump all people of one kind or another into one group of either right or wrong based solely on whether or not they have the same opinions as me. I listen to what others feel and think, put that together (or sometimes not) with what I feel and think and then I move through the world accordingly, while treating others in the way that I would wish to be treated - with basic respect and the freedom to think what I want. You don’t know me, you don’t know anything at all about me except that I’m a Black American woman and I don’t have a problem reading Harry Potter. Here’s what I noticed about you - You make snap judgments about people’s entire lives and personalities based on whether or not they agree with you about reading. You don’t see that you reading Orwell while criticizing me for reading Rowling is talking out of both sides of your mouth (doublethink). You think you’re better than me so you, like any other bully, condescend to me by calling me “my guy” as if we’re teenagers (“four legs bad, two legs good”), and have what you think is a “mic drop,” by telling me to enjoy having no empathy. You think that pushing a political decision will derange the entire world, ignoring that people are surprisingly resilient and that laws - both government and social - can change (which you should know, given how many have changed in just the past few years based on whatever the current trend is) or that making something illegal has never stopped that thing from being done. (ex: Slavery still exists worldwide, even though it’s illegal, but nobody ever talks about that atrocity. Prohibition didn’t work either. Groups of people that others sought to stamp out, for religious or social reasons, still are here ) You act like your ideals don’t also involve controlling not just people’s behavior but even what they think, the same as other political groups do (again, Big Brother-esque censorship). You’re all for freedom and free thought as long as it’s exactly aligned with how you think it should be. If it isn’t then it’s wrong. You don’t appear to be any more open-minded or willing to have an open discussion than any other political group - which is to say, you aren’t at all.
@Tinahgirl83 Haha I'm not reading that 😂 Just consider why buying new Harry Potter content is more important to you than doing the minimal thing to support a marginalized group. Ponder it a little bit at home...
That Phil Dragash audiobook is amazing! Highly recommend Bluefax's audio of The Hobbit too. Done in the same vein as Phil's.
That’s great and all but. ITS TIME FOR YOU TO READ SUN EATER I NEED YOUR MAGICAL VIDEOS COVERING THESE MAGICAL BOOKS
This has a particular sting to me. My fiance has all 7 books on Audible. Paid for a few, got a few back when they gave you tokens for being a premium member. Now she cant listen to any of them. They are all locked and she cant listen unless she pays for audible. Love these books and it really sucks to have them behind a pay wall after they were already purchased.
Hmm I'm confused by this, because I can still access all of my Audible audiobooks I bought with tokens even when I'm no longer subscribing to Audible 🤔 I haven't subscribed at all this year but have still been listening to ones I purchased before
@@CapturedInWords yea not exactly sure ourselves. I contacted audible support and got a basic copy paste answer. It really doesn’t make sense because I also have my books from tokens, just not her.
Hmm I wonder if this is the start of Audible starting they own dramatized adaptions to phase out Graphic Audio? Hope not.
I started out with stephen fry as I am from germany but love the jim dale more. He is just so animated. I used vpn to buy the jim dale versions.
What ok but not gonna lie I’m so excited for this! I’m a huge HP fan so I will be excited for anything Hp related
I really hate the way Jim Dale pronounces several things and dislike his female voices (Hermione and Ginny in particular) but other than those two things he is amazing
I’m not usually a huge fan of having a bunch of actors narrating, I usually prefer the one narrator reading a story because I find I get immersed better, but I’ll definitely check this out
Jim Dale’s reading is by far one of the best I’ve heard. So much better than Fry’s. The voices he uses are amazing and fit perfectly with what you might imagine the characters sound like. And he gets better as the series progresses. Gonna be hard to beat.
I love both but Stephen Fry's version holds my heart
Dale is my preferd i think his Hagrid, Vernon, Seamus, and many others are so good. But i do like Frys Dumbledore voice
I grew up with the Jim Dale. His voices are the voices in my head
hariiiiiiiiii - Hermione
I love full cast audiobooks. I’ll swap out my current ones on my Plex for those for sure. Going to torrent them though 😜
Stephen fry for life, my dad always torrented audiobooks for me as a kid because we were too poor to buy them, so I ended up growing up with Stephen fry off luck of the draw.
Yay !!!
How much will these cost? This will be awesome if affordable
You can get three packs of credits for about like 32 or 35 bucks American and you can get any book at any price for once credit so it would come out to like 11-12 bucks per book. It’s actually really good. If you subscribe to audible on the lowest tier I pay like 7.50 a month or something and get a credit every other month. For 15 you get a credit every month. There are higher tiers with more credits too. It’s a great value for consumers. I also have Everand (formerly Scribd) and they have a lot of great stuff to stream (not own) so I usually check there before I spend a credit just to maximize value but I never run out of books.
Not sure yet, but it's going to be on Audible so you can likely just use an audible credit for each book, which is $14.95
When it comes to audiobooks I'll listen to anything that includes Steven Pacey or Tim Gerard Reynolds
Honestly Jim Dale is the goat and I don't have any desire for new audiobooks at all.
Stephen Fry for sure!! And though Jim Dale is great, Harry Potter read in an American accent has always sounded wrong to me…
Jim Dale is from the UK so he doesn't have an American accent :) He uses various accents for different characters, like Ludo Bagman has a Lancashire accent, the centaurs have sort of a Welsh accent, etc. Here's a video on the voices he bult for HP: ruclips.net/video/whzhEIB9Qkg/видео.htmlsi=CP3wAHxtcuOjMekV
@@CapturedInWords omg! 😱 My bad!!! Why did I think all this time he had an American accent? 🤯 I avoided his audio books because I thought he was an American guy narrating for the American audience! wow. Thanks for the explanation! 🫣
I adore Jim Dale’s audio. I fall asleep listening to HP.
I recommend that you listen to dungeon crawler carl. One voice actor. Nothing matches it. But to be fair, this an exception to that rule. I generally agree with you.
I'm on book 4 of Dungeon crawler Carl right now! Some of the BEST audiobooks I've listened to
@@CapturedInWords so glad to hear this. :)
Jim Dales Winky is epic. Although his Hermione is god awful.
I agree with that! His Hermionevoice is the one that I found to be pretty grating 😅
Nice, but 100 actors is totally Overkill, good voice actors can easily play one major and 3 to 5 secondary characters...
They probably will have each character be played by a different actor. It's overkill but I also want to see what that's gonna be like. The highest budget audiobook ever made.
I can’t wait for this! I couldn’t stand the original narrator
I've tried to listen to the Jim Dale versions a few times but I find his voices really annoying.
You know this is all fine and good but I bought all the Jim Dale copies, that Audible later 'updated' and in some aspects ruined and now I'm gathering Stephen Fry's readings and now this new set? Money grab and nothing more imo.
I never knew they updated the Jim Dale versions! That's unfortunate they just made them worse in some aspects though.
I love Stephen Fry's version and this seems like a huge cash grab to me.
Books are so much better than movies. I have read the books so many times but haven’t watched all 8 movies in a row since the last one came out. They always just make me want to pull out the books and get the better version of the story.
I’m honestly really surprised they’re still doing HP stuff with the general attitude towards JKR but maybe that’s just an online opinion. I for one won’t be giving her any more of my money
Looking at the comments here I guess a lot of people are okay with supporting a TERF lol so maybe it makes sense they’re still doing stuff
It's quite likely an online thing. Sales figures show that the reality is that at the very least, people just don't care about what she says, they are more interested in enjoying the Wizarding World. The series has transcended her now.
Those who are not terminally online either don't care or agree with her.
ew
Y REALLY dont want JKR to make money, but damn.
Aside from JK getting more money from this I can’t see a reason for it to exist. Jim Dale did a phenomenal job already.
Rowling is the Anita Bryant of the 21st century and she won't see a single penny more from me. Gross.
Yes please I can't wait I love jk rowling's Harry Potter series. She is definitely getting my money since she is fighting against the woke nutcases out there.
This is going to be a touchy subject for a lot of people, so lets be aware that fighting amongst ourselves isn't helping anything. You're not a bad person for enjoying these stories, JK is bad for using her platform to spread hate. It's unfortunate we live in a time where she'll get support regardless of whether or not we agree. Remember she is not her art, and whether or not SHE likes it these stories have enraptured and uplifted people in ALL communities not just the ones she supports. She may get the money, but the story isn't hers anymore it's what we make of it. Don't spread the hate, let it fester in its corner until it eats itself alive. Love what you love and who you love un-appolagetically, lest ye harm none
You can love Harry Potter, but actively paying for new content is just not ok anymore. You can't pretend it doesn't affect real people. You can't pretend giving money to the harry potter franchise doesn't support a bigot. You're giving her more money for her to be more powerful and keep influencing harmful politics. You can't separate these two things anymore. It's sad but it's time to grow up.
@@nitzeart She already made her money, not enough people are going to stop paying and even if they did it wouldn't have enough impact on her. Her and people like her are beyond any reproach because of wealth and the power it holds in the world at large, and its unfair and unrealistic to put it on the victims of that system to change such a deep rooted and systemic problem like this. There are other things, more effective ways to face the problem as a whole rather than shameing people out of enjoying a formative piece of their lives. And JK isnt the only one getting paid, there's a whole host of talent putting good work into these things that deserve compensation. And worse comes to worse, not advocating this of course, but there are less scrupulous ways of obtaining this stuff assuredely which negates this whole argument. My comment wasn't about where people should spend their money but about not shameing people for enjoying art just because the artists happens to be a shitty person. If you're running around the internet making people feel bad and telling them to "grow up" because you can't differentiate the problem from the victim, then you're no better than her and have your own growing to do. I wish you well regardless.
@Mel-sn5dl Yeah this doomerism mentality is really not helpful when trying to enact social change. Even if it's just a little bit, action builds up collectively. It WOULD be something at least!
But all I'm getting from your reply is that you don't care enough about trans or queer people (or women for that matter), to not support someone who is actively influencing politics that discriminate against them?? Guessed as much. Have the day someone without empathy deserves, then
You're bad for supporting child mutilation and risking women's rights. Grow up
@enie6359 No, just because YOU can't separate these things doesn't mean others can't. You don't get to tell people what their actions mean just because you choose something different.
I'm really disappointed you're making content about harry potter 😢
I love your videos and energy, but you can't keep a "neutral" coverage of harry potter content anymore. Anything other than opposing it is harmful for the queer community. I do hope you can reconsider what type of authors you want to support.
You just watched neutral coverage of Harry Potter. It is entirely possible to have a negative opinion on the author and her views while enjoying her work. I'm sure you will disagree, but it remains true regardless. Not everyone has to participate in every cause.
If you don't want to support the author and her work, then don't. But you have no right to tell others what to do. If you don't like it, then you don't have to watch.
The recent boycott of Hogwarts Legacy stands as a good barometer of where the majority stands on all things Potter, though. 😊
@@RoadTravelled80 Do whatever you want then. I'm voicing an opinion for someone who has influence on a lot of people who will then support or not new launches of Harry Potter. If you don't like to be lumped with bigots then maybe don't buy new Harry Potter stuff. You can still like the series and consume the content through ethical means without putting money on a the pockets of a transphobe.
@enie6359 I will do what I want, thanks, I'm not really interested in who I'm lumped in with. I'll continue to disagree with the author and still buy her products, as will a great deal of others. I'm sure you'll have noticed, but Harry Potter continues to be as popular as ever despite what JK Rowling says and does. Most people just don't care.
@RoadTravelled80 Lots of millenials are covering up their deathly hallows tattoos. Idk what you mean by as popular 😂 It definitely isn't, because the association has become too strong. Good for you that you don't care to be labeled a bigot. People who are actual allies and empathetic care tho.
You can't disagree with a big and support her by buying her products at the same time without contributing to the problem. That's the point.
@enie6359 And lots of people are still getting new Harry Potter tattoos, not to mention the profits of Potter merch and books rising. So, by actual measurable metrics and not annecdotal evidence, it's definitely still as, if not more, popular than ever. That's why things like this Audible dramatisation are being commissioned.
Just because your stance is that supporting Harry Potter makes you complicit in JK Rowling's bigotry doesn't make it true.
It would be just as easy to say that by owning almost any modern technology that you are pro-slavery and child labour due to the mining and manufacturing conditions of the components that make up the technology you use but I'm guessing you'll claim that's not true.
Never giving JK Rowling any more money 👎
Yes, how dare she, a woman, stand up for women. Never before have I been witness to a more distilled form of evil.
🙄🙄🙄
Oh shut up, she's got so much money that adding to it makes zero difference, not giving her money isn't gonna make her return to homelessness! You're not giving her money, you'd be giving all the hard working people who've worked on this the money, but you wanna feel like a hero by childishly stating you won't give her money, but I bet you're still fine with giving Nike and Apple and the numerous other companies and people who use slave labour and engage in other horrendous inhuman acts, but it's not popular to protest them is it? You're a fake Hero who only cares about what people think of you and you don't wanna be alone, but let me tell you something, the fact you live so dishonestly makes you alone, because you're not even really yourself
That's fine there are plenty that will including me!
Yeah bro, don't eat bratwurst either, it's German. Dint wanna support the nazis. Also, no more Ramen. Don't wanna support the genocide China is committing. Can't eat sushi, you'd be supporting the empire of the rising son, who raped the chinese so brutally they still hold a grudge.
Learn to separate art from the artist or risk looking like an immature fool for the remainder of your life.
No one gives a shit
love you guys but potter is hot garbage. like i said...i love you guys.
I can't wait for this to flop. Harry Potter is was and always will be trash. I go through a book in about 1-2 days, it took me a year to finish the first book.
Yeah, the literal millions of us fans must be deranged or something.
@@robertgronewold3326 being proud to support an author despite her deranged and abject cruelty towards an oppressed minority group really isn't the flex you think it is.
@@robertgronewold3326 The fact that your first response is literally the Ad Populum fallacy. Yes, yes you are. Listen I am not knocking trash per se, there is absolutely nothing wrong with liking trash. The error here, and it's an error that a lot of people make, is the belief that "I am good. I like a thing. Therefore that thing is good.". And that is frankly just dumb. Further it's actually dangerous.
Harry Potter is a special kind of trash. What made Harry Potter "good" was never the books which are from a story and prose perspective mid at best. Like Star wars, Lost, Sherlock, Pokemon, etc, it was the fandom around it.
Media Literacy is important. Liking something doesn't make it good. Disliking something doesn't make it bad. Liking trash doesn't make you trash. Not liking trash doesn't make you superior. *Everybody* likes trash, get over it. What is important is not if you like trash or not, but what kind of trash you like, and even more important than that if you can recognize it as trash.
I will ask you the same question I have asked thousands (literally) of Harry Potter fans before. Why do you think Harry Potter is *good*? To be clear I am not asking why you like it, I am asking why you think its good as a work of fiction. Give me something concrete "The character of Harry Potter is written well with a dynamic personality." "The world building is well thought out." "It's an engaging social commentary". Something anything that you can give concrete examples for.
@@alananimus9145I would agree with you on the Ad Populum fallacy, but your original comment said this prpject would flop, implying nobody would buy it. While popularity isn't automatically relevant to quality, it is relevant to quantity of products sold. So this likely won't be a flop.
@@sanchorim8014 thanks for the thoughtful response. On my phone right now so I need to wait to give you a full response. I have actual reasons why I think the project will flop and am willing to make that argument once I have a computer in front of me.
I do understand there's a lot of people who want it to flop and are saying it will because they want it to.