I don’t think Jonathan’s a bad host in most cases but he was being quite rude in this interview, Brian’s so smart and can tell he loves this subject with all his heart, it’s not hard to stop being the ‘funny guy’ for five minutes and just listen
@Simon Mullaney yeah, other talk show hosts have showed there are other ways of doing entertainment where you dont have to be cringe to be funny and rude to your guests
@Simon Mullaney I tend to avoid parties so that I don't have to have an interaction with idiots like you. He does that with all of his guests so he's not rude? That explains a lot
The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring :-). Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. There are 7.7 billion people on planet Earth, yet I was the only one who knew I was viewing the light and images of the universe in real time, maybe I should be working for NASA or Elon Musk :-) Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot be both a particle and wave. There are no space-time fantasy unions or gravity waves that can join a particle, wave and time together then bend, curve and stretch them like a rubber band. Neither time nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch time like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. The speed of light can be slowed from 186,000 miles per second down to 38 mph by shooting a laser through extremely cold sodium atoms acting as “optical molasses” If the universe were suddenly destroyed, collapsed or fell into a black hole do you honestly think slowing down the speed of light with sodium atoms would save the earth from being destroyed, giving people on earth time to find another planet to colonize and destroy :-). Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If black holes reside in a region of Einstein's theorized space-time where gravity and mass are so dense that nothing, neither mass-particles nor electromagnetic radiation such as light can escape then how could it be possible for the entire mass of our universe to escape the unimaginable density of the proposed Big Bang? According to general relativity sufficient compact mass-density will deform space-time to form a black hole which obviously debunks both Big Bang theory and relativity! Big Bang theorists rely on red shift to support the hypothesis that the universe is expanding, the very phenomena that supports the hypothesis of a (non-expanding static universe). You can duplicate the ion thruster jets of a black hole in a vacuum using a Tesla coil or build one using high voltage-an array of magnets-a CRT-TV yoke or inductor coil. Black holes are nothing but plasma driven vortex electromagnetic fields expanding electromagnetic waves in space. Since the vortex of black holes are thought to be at the center of all galaxies they might be the very force that created them. Gravitational lensing occurs in all wavelengths of light including (red shift-microwave background radiation). Gravity from huge celestial objects of galaxies bend, curve and expand light giving the appearance of what Einstein wrongly theorized as time dilation-space-time-debunking the big bang. Mass from galaxies, planets and black hole electromagnetic fields bend, curve and expand light giving the appearance of what Einstein wrongly theorized as time dilation-space-time dimensions. Light like all electromagnetic radiation and electricity is the result of moving electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - the appearance of longer wavelengths in red shift. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If space was curved-warped according to Albert Einstein's curved-warped gravity theory, like a boat in the ocean these same gravity waves would affect time and the perfect balance in solar system orbital mechanics throwing planets off course-out of orbit in a collision course towards the sun where a planets gravity and time would increase and decrease with different velocity rates as they ascend and descend the curves of gravity waves. Using optical clocks and lasers to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If gravity is the result of mass then before the universe came into being gravity couldn't have existed simply because mass was not yet created! Galaxies with massive gravity from the early Big Bang would have been gravitationally bound like the Andromeda galaxy is to the Milky Way galaxy, the sun, moon and planets in all solar systems in the universe yet these early galaxies were able to somehow escape these massive gravitational forces continuing to expand at an increasingly faster rate. Into what, nothing? Nothing has no properties! Neither the atom, universe nor time can be created or destroyed. Albert Einstein an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix. “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time, and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. If space was curved-warped according to Albert Einstein's curved-warped gravity theory, like a boat in the ocean these same gravity waves would effect time and the perfect balance in solar system orbital mechanics throwing planets off course-out of orbit in a collision course towards the sun where a planets gravity and time would increase and decrease with different velocity rates as they ascend and descend the curves of gravity waves. Using optical clocks and lasers to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. Neither time nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch time like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix-Magnetron.
The biggest threat to humanity is human stupidity. The theory of everything according to humans that believe their intellect evolved from a monkey's brain. If the light waves from the sun were 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of Einstein's space-time then people on Earth are just imagining the infrared warmth of the sun coming up on the horizon. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-) The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. A mirror is a wave reflector that flips images from left to right, but according to Einstein the images you see are the result of projectile light particle photons being transported into past and future dimensions of space-time. Explain how particle light photons can re-converge their molecular structures in mirrors and how this is done without violating the law of conservation of energy. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in all directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel all directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-). Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Einstein's projectile light particle proton has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime and because so wavelengths of light cannot stretch through spacetime! Red-shifts are simply the result of decelerating electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - longer wavelengths in red shift. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-). The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Similar to a mirror light is a real-time wave reflector where light and images travel in straight lines-in all directions in space as they do on earth. The faintest stars and galaxies are neither in a past or future dimension of Einstein's space-time, they're in real-time. Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel in both directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second :-) It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Revelation 22:13. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord Albert, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron
@Diaz Saiko Testing the speed light in on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. The biggest threat to humanity is human stupidity. The theory of everything according to humans that believe their intellect evolved from a monkey's brain. If the light waves from the sun were 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of Einstein's space-time then people on Earth are just imagining the infrared warmth of the sun coming up on the horizon. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-) The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. A mirror is a wave reflector that flips images from left to right, but according to Einstein the images you see are the result of projectile light particle photons being transported into past and future dimensions of space-time. Explain how particle light photons can re-converge their molecular structures in mirrors and how this is done without violating the law of conservation of energy. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in all directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel all directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-). Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Einstein's projectile light particle proton has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime and because so wavelengths of light cannot stretch through spacetime! Red-shifts are simply the result of decelerating electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - longer wavelengths in red shift. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-). The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Similar to a mirror light is a real-time wave reflector where light and images travel in straight lines-in all directions in space as they do on earth. The faintest stars and galaxies are neither in a past or future dimension of Einstein's space-time, they're in real-time. Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel in both directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second :-) It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. The Doppler effect is wrongly conflated with cosmological Redshift. As one approaches a blowing horn the perceived pitch is higher until the horn is reached, then becomes lower as the horn is passed. This phenomenon is caused by the physical movement of a mechanical soundwave traveling through the medium of air, similar to throwing a rock in a pond, the rock creates physical movement in the medium of water. Cosmological Redshifts are merely the GoPro fisheye effect where wavelengths appear to lengthen-stretch from the phenomenon of gravitational lensing. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Revelation 22:13. Magnetron
RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL REASONS FOR 'BIG BANG' MYTHOLOGY One of the main reasons 'big bang' is pushed so ferociously is that it has been endorsed by the vatican.. "In fact, it seems that present-day science, with one sweeping step back across millions of centuries, has succeeded in bearing witness to that primordial 'Fiat lux' (Let there be light) uttered at the moment when, along with matter, there burst forth from nothing a sea of light and radiation, while the particles of the chemical elements split and formed into millions of galaxies ... Hence, creation took place in time, therefore, there is a Creator, God exists!" (Pope Pius XII, 1951) 300 years before this, 'the church' had Giordano Bruno publicly murdered for saying that space is infinite.. You 'do the math'.. NO! Please don't! This is why the erroneous ideas of 'infinity' are used in mathematics, specifically to confuse people into a misunderstanding of what infinitude actually means.. If space is infinite, 'god' cannot be.. People are led to believe all sorts of nonsense, like we can imagine anything 'fantastical' and untrue, but cannot understand what IS real? Doesn't that seem a little suspect to you? People are taken advantage of because of their blind belief in things that are untrue, told to them by someone they are conditioned to trust.. This has been happening for so long within 'society', that it is simply an acceptable and 'normalised' modus operandi nowadays. And 'social media' is an ideal platform to promote as many false ideas and confuse people as much as possible. It would be very naive to expect that people with the most to lose would not be those who publish the most falsity all over 'social media' to maintain dominant positions in other areas of the 'community'.. People generally have a very poor understanding of what the word 'infinite' actually means.. This is not any kind of 'fault', but just that we have evolved within the confines of what appears to be a finite environment, and we thus try to look at things in finite ways, also justifying those 'finite' thoughts. When I first approached the 'problem' I had the same difficulties, so it takes our minds a lot of effort to reach another perspective of understanding, but it IS achievable.. Firstly, there cannot be more than one 'instance' of infinitude, otherwise a secondary 'thing' would render them both 'finite'. So we are describing a 'oneness'.. Also, it can have no 'beginning' nor 'ending' as these would also necessitate a secondary 'thing' (or the utter nonsense of a 'nothing'!), so we are describing 'eternity' when we apply 'time' concepts. Then, we have to admit that it can only be the one thing that interconnects all other 'things', and we deduce this to be 'Space', necessarily.. All references to 'size' or 'direction' do not apply to the nature of infinitude, and thus have no relevance to our understanding of the true nature of existence. 'Measurement' has limitations.. When we point to any position in Space, we effectively create a 'beginning' to any subsequent forms of measurement, which only has relevance to the entity desiring to understand said 'measurement'. Measuring things does not make them a feature of the nature of reality, only a desire of 'measurement' from a Human perspective. Within infinitude everything appears to be at the 'centre' of that which it finds detectable ('observable').. So, the moment you create the perspective of a 'centre', you become that centre..Here we can find the real problem with using 'mathematics' as a tool for understanding infinite nature. We have to firstly posit the 'points' to be 'measured' in order for the measurement to take place.. And this is why we end up inventing 'things' that do not exist in reality from mathematical constructs that do not describe the truth about nature.. spaceandmotion
Brian Cox It's such a gentleman, He didn't lose his patience one time with Jonathan, And you would think Jonathan Could be respectful enough and take somebody serious for a few moments in time.
Ita a fucking comedy based late night talk show, watch one of the many serious interviews on educational channels and shows if that is what you want. Honestly they were both having a good time and the show did what it was supposed to. Grow up.
Jonathan Ross showing how intellectually inept he is. When people like this come on the show they should be shown the respect they deserve. I for one can't wait for Cox's new show to come out
What because he doesn’t have an interest. Maybe he knows everything about Egyptology? He has to make it funny and lighthearted for the masses. You condescending prat get a life
@@derektrotter4287 jesus christ Jonathan Ross has a groupie, the thickest man on TV has a sychophant. He'll never aknowledge you Derek, so sad to see this unrequited love.
@@morganthedruid1 I’m no fan just think it’s odd how people come up with such bull💩 observations. I think to massage there own egos, so with this logic you must be a massive Brian cox fan? You pathetic little nosher
Jonathan always gets involved with his guests and asks questions etc but he didn’t do this for Brian , so I struggle to understand why he invited him to be a guest , I’m a huge fan of Brian cox I’ve even met him he’s a real nice polite friendly person and I feel like Ross disrespected him a lot in this interview
I think it's because Brian can go on really long explanations that would keep us, the nerds, interested but for the casual viewers who tune in to laugh at Jeremy Kyle. He feels the need to cut off Brian before he gets in the flow to keep the answers short, and keep it moving for the ADHD-like attention span of talk show audience members lest they fall asleep or at home, change the channel.
I think all of you need to grow the fuck up tbh. Like seriously Brian was fine with it, the audience was fine with and the rest of the guests were fine with it. But oh no, some youtube keyboard warriors aren't happy. Oh, well, didums.
@@smullaney84 Ye but good lord looking at these shows nowadays kind of makes me cringe, it's such old humour, my rotting brain only understand vulgar humour or something completely stupid like a stock image of lettuce with dubstep. So at this point I'm way more interested in the science than jokes.
What the hell is Ross doing? Completely ruined the entire interview. I had the same feeling watching this as I used to have in school when a stupid plonker classmate would act up and give the teacher a hard time when everyone else is trying to be polite and listen. Absolute cringefest, rude, disgusting behaviour
I appreciate JR has to get the occasional laugh to entertain the viewers but not every single sentence. He used a clever and sincere guest like a comics fall guy.
I call him the smiling scientist ❤️ we should all know these things but with him teaching makes me wanna learn more!!! He makes it real interesting because he’s very passionate about his work!!!
These "scientists" might wanna look up and around the moon, amateurs watch crafts buzzing about and blowing stuff up on the moon for decades, but hey, NASA doesn't see anything and these parrots aren't payed to speak the truth.
BrianCox giving An Introduction to Physics lecture at Manchester Uni is so inspirational. If I had been privy to it I would have taken a different career path.
Surely if you wanted to hear Mr.Cox giving a serious lecture would you really watch a crap show like this,,the audience are in fits of laughter,shows you simple they are.I would say its all part of Brian Cox,s methology of getting people interested in science.
@@khutt19 No, but what I consider entertaining is a talk show host making the most of their guest. Why have someone like Brian on if that's not what you're going to do?
When brian says a billion years I believe him and I zoom to a young earth I recognize and I dont. I sort of time travel when I listen to him. Then when the video ends it’s back to reality. And it’s bitter sweet. So I’ll just watch more Brian cox and float mesmerized in incomprehensible vastness and infinity immeasurable….. Brian asked what more do I want? I want to live again. I have never desired it as I do now.
Absolutely. Sad when a grown adult feels the need to try to suck attention out of what could be an interesting occasion, due to the potential of that interesting occasion. Parasitic, in a way,
You to sad idiots obviously don’t know Jonathan Ross that well.. he’s just having abit of fun and messing about. The guests know what he’s about and whats gonna happen before they come on the show
and that's why we were there to be the biggest dumb human beings to sabotage the knowledge of a great scientist, like always, blocking the right in every single sentence. What a dumb greatest idiot interviewer! He should be thrown out of this show like a peace of crap and send him to middle school where we can learn RESPECT.
A potentially edible comet because I know that’s the only thing you’re interested in. I didn’t realise Brian was able and willing to take the piss out of people. Nice one. 😊
If the sensors did not detect any signal from other planets in which there are civilizations, this does not mean that there are no civilizations on other planets, perhaps there is something wrong with the sensors or the way they are trying to detect any signal coming from some planets, in the end it is impossible that we are the only ones in this galaxy
Brian Cox took that very very well, Being on a comedy show~ He wanted to say so much more but he didn't get mad or anything~ he just went with the flow as best as he could, Which is really cool! I personally wanted to hear all he wanted to say but, I guess Jonathan Ross wasn't going to let that happen this time!
One Sage said this 2500 years ago , read the scriptures. We are not alone but we will never reach those stars in our life time as the distances are phenomenal
Brian Cox makes physics interesting... Funnily enough it was a subject I hated so much at school, that I refused to study it after a year. Although I swear I would have worked hard at it if Brian had been the teacher!
What baffles me (correct me if I'm wrong) but if we find an Earth like planet that's millions of miles away by the time we can see it we would be looking at something in the past?
Yes, if there is an earth like planet, which is inhabited and has a civiliaztion like ours which is several million light years away then we would be looking at their civilization several million years ago. The same applies with earth... if you where to travel several million light years away from our planet and looked back on it, you would see the dinosaurs since the light has yet to reach that far of a distance.
Simple microbial life began so early in world history I would suggest it was more likely than not. However the stability required to get to intelligent life may be far more infrequent.
Indeed. For complex life to originate on Earth we think that one microbe survived being "eaten" or engulfed by a larger microbe and that gave rise to the first eukaryotic cell, which is the building block on this planet of all intelligent life. That common ancestor, or the chance encounter that sparked the path, is very special and possibly incredibly rare. I do think the universe is teeming with life. I don't think we'll meet an intelligent species beyond our planet
Duno why some are so upset, I think Ross was doing what Ross does best. Keeping things light. Brian Cox has nothing to prove and is also clearly able to have a laugh at someone else's expense. He wasn't there to teach science, just went to have a chat with a funny guy.
I've always thought that a good fantasy story could be written about aliens who live on a slightly smaller planet than Earth, and so are larger and are are capable of slightly more impressive physical feats than on Earth. With the added benefit of having some quality world building, due to having an entire planet, yet more enclosed than Earth.
@ Hareecio Nelson, The key world is enclosed, this is an enclosed system which is why you will never see anyone living on some imaginary planet. The satanic scum behind everything will kill most of the population off before any chance of exploring somewhere new, most of the ocean is not even explored.
In junior school (late 80's) my class were tasked with creating an alien with a backstory. My alien had a scarf and girls - I was told off for not being imaginative!
I originally put a knee-jerk reaction dislike to this ..... just frustratingly annoyed at Ross's inane comments ..... I soon cooled down and changed it to a like ..... Prof Cox must have sooooooo much patience dealing with people like this.
Many of us also get a knee-jerk reaction to kick a "scientist/professional sceptic" in the teeth when you've got 30 people who had direct UFO and E.T. contact but folks like this guy explain to you that it had to be a gas bubble, a swarm of fireflies etc. These professional parrots can't see the forest from the tree.
@@4Everlast You have literally no evidence and are just filled with bias because you want them to be true. Cox is a scientist, not someone who says things are true because he wants them to be, even with no evidence. The 'face on Mars' perfectly sums up you idiots, I bet you thought that was evidence of aliens and a government cover up - with proper evidence it's revealed to just be a rock. UFO means UNIDENTIFIED flying object. Meaning it's not identified and no one knows what it is or has any evidence of it. Not once have these been proven to be aliens, but many, many, times they've been proven to be something insignificant such as a hot hair balloon, a bird, or a piece of debris.
My physics teacher said he was at uni with Brian Cox, and whenever he mentioned it he'd get this look on his face which clearly said "and he's out there making tv shows, whilst I'm teaching 11-18 year olds. Where did it all go wrong" Watching the bit where he took the jug of cream away and then put an end to it by pouring the liquid nitrogen into it... it was almost like the roles were reversed. Finally Brian Cox is teaching what appears to be kids
"To prevent them from really thinking out anything themselves, we shall deflect their attention to amusements, games, pastimes, excitement, and people's palaces. Such interest will distract their minds completely from questions on which we might be obliged to struggle with them. Becoming less and less accustomed to independent thinking, people will express themselves in unison with us because we alone offer new lines of thought- of course through persons whom they do not consider as in any way connected with us." Thirteenth Protocol of The Learned Elders of Zion.
Ross is underestimating his viewers. He doesn't think they have the attention span to care about science. He's literally the TV hosts from Don't Look Up.
I like to do this fairly simple calculation: There are about 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the observable universe. If only one in 100,000,000 had a planet on which life was possible and there was life on only one in 100,000,000 of those, there would be 7,000,000 planets with life in the universe. You can vary the numbers of course, I think you can make the last two numbers smaller which would increase the number of planets with life on them, but when I see how big the number is with such a low probability I think it's arrogant to do so think that we are alone in the universe.
Baz.. if you read these comments... Carl Sagan said there are 100 billion stars in the milky way I've heard you say 200 billion.. I've just watched " how the universe works" and some bird said..... 400 billion. 😠 not a small difference. Do we know how many or not?
I get this is a talk show but when your guest is actually interesting and you keep interrupting with comments that just aren't funny it comes across as rude, not amusing at all.
And in less than 3 minutes, the previously unquantifiable respect I had for Jonathan Ross as a host is now suddenly quantifiable: 0. Clearly then, if it's not fashioned out of shiny things, makes loud noises upon stimulation and screaming bright colours, he hasn't the mental capacity to appraise.
Nobody is, other than some lobotomised lunatic in Broadmoor Hospital! What a cringefest of examples of why we are not fit to be part of The Universe……yet.
Ross shows himself up here. He’s trying to be funny, but he often comes across like an overgrown annoying school kid. You can just tell that Cox just wants to have a decent conversation and inform, but is constantly undermined by Ross being plain daft.
Brian cox is not a comedian or a singer that came to chit chat and make jokes ! he is a god damn scientists ! he should be given the respect he deserves and he should be given the time to talk properly without someone interrupting or making fun of his words ! this is absolutely disgraceful !
It's not the first time that Jonathan has been really rude, the worst was a time that he "interviewed" Martin Clunes in 2010 on "Friday Night With Jonathan Ross" on the BBC. I especially found this cringeworthy when he kept insisting Tom Daley should drink cream with the deliberate insinuation that came with it...
I don’t think Jonathan’s a bad host in most cases but he was being quite rude in this interview, Brian’s so smart and can tell he loves this subject with all his heart, it’s not hard to stop being the ‘funny guy’ for five minutes and just listen
I couldn't have said it better myself! 👏
Found him annoying. When Brian cox has something to say you want to listen to it
He actually comes across as a spoilt child sometimes
He was just saying what we all feel. We nit interested in microbes we want aliens! He was just having fun...
That is his job, these shows are supposed to be light hearted, with a good dose of humour chucked in, it's the style of the show 🤦♂️
This is the best example of “If you are the smartest in a room, you’re in the wrong room.”
@Simon Mullaney yeah, other talk show hosts have showed there are other ways of doing entertainment where you dont have to be cringe to be funny and rude to your guests
@Simon Mullaney I tend to avoid parties so that I don't have to have an interaction with idiots like you. He does that with all of his guests so he's not rude? That explains a lot
Well said my friend well said
@@axernothow was he rude?
Cox is beyond this character
I wish he would let Professor Brian Cox speak, he is such a brilliant man to listen too.
Not to mention handsome.
He did let him speak, they had a conversation.
Cox is just relaying other people's ideas. He has not 1 single idea of his own
Brian Cox should get an award for the way he's able to deal with stupid people
Very true and even more funny
The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring :-). Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. There are 7.7 billion people on planet Earth, yet I was the only one who knew I was viewing the light and images of the universe in real time, maybe I should be working for NASA or Elon Musk :-)
Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot be both a particle and wave. There are no space-time fantasy unions or gravity waves that can join a particle, wave and time together then bend, curve and stretch them like a rubber band. Neither time nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch time like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other.
The speed of light can be slowed from 186,000 miles per second down to 38 mph by shooting a laser through extremely cold sodium atoms acting as “optical molasses” If the universe were suddenly destroyed, collapsed or fell into a black hole do you honestly think slowing down the speed of light with sodium atoms would save the earth from being destroyed, giving people on earth time to find another planet to colonize and destroy :-). Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing.
If black holes reside in a region of Einstein's theorized space-time where gravity and mass are so dense that nothing, neither mass-particles nor electromagnetic radiation such as light can escape then how could it be possible for the entire mass of our universe to escape the unimaginable density of the proposed Big Bang? According to general relativity sufficient compact mass-density will deform space-time to form a black hole which obviously debunks both Big Bang theory and relativity! Big Bang theorists rely on red shift to support the hypothesis that the universe is expanding, the very phenomena that supports the hypothesis of a (non-expanding static universe). You can duplicate the ion thruster jets of a black hole in a vacuum using a Tesla coil or build one using high voltage-an array of magnets-a CRT-TV yoke or inductor coil. Black holes are nothing but plasma driven vortex electromagnetic fields expanding electromagnetic waves in space. Since the vortex of black holes are thought to be at the center of all galaxies they might be the very force that created them.
Gravitational lensing occurs in all wavelengths of light including (red shift-microwave background radiation). Gravity from huge celestial objects of galaxies bend, curve and expand light giving the appearance of what Einstein wrongly theorized as time dilation-space-time-debunking the big bang. Mass from galaxies, planets and black hole electromagnetic fields bend, curve and expand light giving the appearance of what Einstein wrongly theorized as time dilation-space-time dimensions. Light like all electromagnetic radiation and electricity is the result of moving electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - the appearance of longer wavelengths in red shift. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other.
If space was curved-warped according to Albert Einstein's curved-warped gravity theory, like a boat in the ocean these same gravity waves would affect time and the perfect balance in solar system orbital mechanics throwing planets off course-out of orbit in a collision course towards the sun where a planets gravity and time would increase and decrease with different velocity rates as they ascend and descend the curves of gravity waves. Using optical clocks and lasers to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing.
If gravity is the result of mass then before the universe came into being gravity couldn't have existed simply because mass was not yet created! Galaxies with massive gravity from the early Big Bang would have been gravitationally bound like the Andromeda galaxy is to the Milky Way galaxy, the sun, moon and planets in all solar systems in the universe yet these early galaxies were able to somehow escape these massive gravitational forces continuing to expand at an increasingly faster rate. Into what, nothing? Nothing has no properties! Neither the atom, universe nor time can be created or destroyed. Albert Einstein an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix. “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time, and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end.
If space was curved-warped according to Albert Einstein's curved-warped gravity theory, like a boat in the ocean these same gravity waves would effect time and the perfect balance in solar system orbital mechanics throwing planets off course-out of orbit in a collision course towards the sun where a planets gravity and time would increase and decrease with different velocity rates as they ascend and descend the curves of gravity waves. Using optical clocks and lasers to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. Neither time nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch time like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix-Magnetron.
The biggest threat to humanity is human stupidity. The theory of everything according to humans that believe their intellect evolved from a monkey's brain. If the light waves from the sun were 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of Einstein's space-time then people on Earth are just imagining the infrared warmth of the sun coming up on the horizon. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-)
The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. A mirror is a wave reflector that flips images from left to right, but according to Einstein the images you see are the result of projectile light particle photons being transported into past and future dimensions of space-time. Explain how particle light photons can re-converge their molecular structures in mirrors and how this is done without violating the law of conservation of energy.
From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in all directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel all directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-). Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions.
Einstein's projectile light particle proton has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime and because so wavelengths of light cannot stretch through spacetime! Red-shifts are simply the result of decelerating electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - longer wavelengths in red shift. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-).
The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Similar to a mirror light is a real-time wave reflector where light and images travel in straight lines-in all directions in space as they do on earth. The faintest stars and galaxies are neither in a past or future dimension of Einstein's space-time, they're in real-time.
Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel in both directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second :-)
It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end.
"I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Revelation 22:13. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord Albert, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron
@Diaz Saiko Testing the speed light in on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. The biggest threat to humanity is human stupidity. The theory of everything according to humans that believe their intellect evolved from a monkey's brain. If the light waves from the sun were 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of Einstein's space-time then people on Earth are just imagining the infrared warmth of the sun coming up on the horizon. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-)
The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. A mirror is a wave reflector that flips images from left to right, but according to Einstein the images you see are the result of projectile light particle photons being transported into past and future dimensions of space-time. Explain how particle light photons can re-converge their molecular structures in mirrors and how this is done without violating the law of conservation of energy.
From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in all directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel all directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-). Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions.
Einstein's projectile light particle proton has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime and because so wavelengths of light cannot stretch through spacetime! Red-shifts are simply the result of decelerating electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - longer wavelengths in red shift. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-).
The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Similar to a mirror light is a real-time wave reflector where light and images travel in straight lines-in all directions in space as they do on earth. The faintest stars and galaxies are neither in a past or future dimension of Einstein's space-time, they're in real-time.
Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel in both directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second :-)
It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end.
The Doppler effect is wrongly conflated with cosmological Redshift. As one approaches a blowing horn the perceived pitch is higher until the horn is reached, then becomes lower as the horn is passed. This phenomenon is caused by the physical movement of a mechanical soundwave traveling through the medium of air, similar to throwing a rock in a pond, the rock creates physical movement in the medium of water. Cosmological Redshifts are merely the GoPro fisheye effect where wavelengths appear to lengthen-stretch from the phenomenon of gravitational lensing. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Revelation 22:13. Magnetron
RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL REASONS FOR 'BIG BANG' MYTHOLOGY
One of the main reasons 'big bang' is pushed so ferociously is that it has been endorsed by the vatican..
"In fact, it seems that present-day science, with one sweeping step back across millions of centuries, has succeeded in bearing witness to that primordial 'Fiat lux' (Let there be light) uttered at the moment when, along with matter, there burst forth from nothing a sea of light and radiation, while the particles of the chemical elements split and formed into millions of galaxies ... Hence, creation took place in time, therefore, there is a Creator, God exists!" (Pope Pius XII, 1951)
300 years before this, 'the church' had Giordano Bruno publicly murdered for saying that space is infinite..
You 'do the math'.. NO! Please don't! This is why the erroneous ideas of 'infinity' are used in mathematics, specifically to confuse people into a misunderstanding of what infinitude actually means.. If space is infinite, 'god' cannot be..
People are led to believe all sorts of nonsense, like we can imagine anything 'fantastical' and untrue, but cannot understand what IS real? Doesn't that seem a little suspect to you?
People are taken advantage of because of their blind belief in things that are untrue, told to them by someone they are conditioned to trust.. This has been happening for so long within 'society', that it is simply an acceptable and 'normalised' modus operandi nowadays. And 'social media' is an ideal platform to promote as many false ideas and confuse people as much as possible. It would be very naive to expect that people with the most to lose would not be those who publish the most falsity all over 'social media' to maintain dominant positions in other areas of the 'community'..
People generally have a very poor understanding of what the word 'infinite' actually means.. This is not any kind of 'fault', but just that we have evolved within the confines of what appears to be a finite environment, and we thus try to look at things in finite ways, also justifying those 'finite' thoughts. When I first approached the 'problem' I had the same difficulties, so it takes our minds a lot of effort to reach another perspective of understanding, but it IS achievable..
Firstly, there cannot be more than one 'instance' of infinitude, otherwise a secondary 'thing' would render them both 'finite'. So we are describing a 'oneness'.. Also, it can have no 'beginning' nor 'ending' as these would also necessitate a secondary 'thing' (or the utter nonsense of a 'nothing'!), so we are describing 'eternity' when we apply 'time' concepts. Then, we have to admit that it can only be the one thing that interconnects all other 'things', and we deduce this to be 'Space', necessarily..
All references to 'size' or 'direction' do not apply to the nature of infinitude, and thus have no relevance to our understanding of the true nature of existence. 'Measurement' has limitations.. When we point to any position in Space, we effectively create a 'beginning' to any subsequent forms of measurement, which only has relevance to the entity desiring to understand said 'measurement'. Measuring things does not make them a feature of the nature of reality, only a desire of 'measurement' from a Human perspective.
Within infinitude everything appears to be at the 'centre' of that which it finds detectable ('observable').. So, the moment you create the perspective of a 'centre', you become that centre..Here we can find the real problem with using 'mathematics' as a tool for understanding infinite nature. We have to firstly posit the 'points' to be 'measured' in order for the measurement to take place.. And this is why we end up inventing 'things' that do not exist in reality from mathematical constructs that do not describe the truth about nature..
spaceandmotion
Brian Cox It's such a gentleman, He didn't lose his patience one time with Jonathan, And you would think Jonathan Could be respectful enough and take somebody serious for a few moments in time.
Brian losing his patience was confiscating the cream and adding liquid nitrogen to it 😂
Ita a fucking comedy based late night talk show, watch one of the many serious interviews on educational channels and shows if that is what you want. Honestly they were both having a good time and the show did what it was supposed to. Grow up.
I could listen to Brian talk about space for hours, such a calming voice and he's good at explaining stuff
I never knew Madara was interested in science....
"Everything dies, including the universe" - stellar! bang on!
"I love it when Brian comes on the show"
So you can talk over him?
Jonathan Ross showing how intellectually inept he is. When people like this come on the show they should be shown the respect they deserve. I for one can't wait for Cox's new show to come out
What because he doesn’t have an interest. Maybe he knows everything about Egyptology? He has to make it funny and lighthearted for the masses. You condescending prat get a life
He knows everything about vintage comics? Does Brian cox? People don’t tune in for a science lesson you angry person…. Grow up
@@derektrotter4287 2 replies. I'm honered. I think it's time to change your tampon sweetheart. Sounds like you're the angry one
@@derektrotter4287 jesus christ Jonathan Ross has a groupie, the thickest man on TV has a sychophant. He'll never aknowledge you Derek, so sad to see this unrequited love.
@@morganthedruid1 I’m no fan just think it’s odd how people come up with such bull💩 observations. I think to massage there own egos, so with this logic you must be a massive Brian cox fan? You pathetic little nosher
Jonathan always gets involved with his guests and asks questions etc but he didn’t do this for Brian , so I struggle to understand why he invited him to be a guest , I’m a huge fan of Brian cox I’ve even met him he’s a real nice polite friendly person and I feel like Ross disrespected him a lot in this interview
It's not that Ross disrespected Brian Cox, he was totally out of his depth and just made an idiot of himself.
I think it's because Brian can go on really long explanations that would keep us, the nerds, interested but for the casual viewers who tune in to laugh at Jeremy Kyle. He feels the need to cut off Brian before he gets in the flow to keep the answers short, and keep it moving for the ADHD-like attention span of talk show audience members lest they fall asleep or at home, change the channel.
I was fine with his jokes, As long as he let Brian Cox explain what he was going to say.. Which he didn't!
I think all of you need to grow the fuck up tbh. Like seriously Brian was fine with it, the audience was fine with and the rest of the guests were fine with it. But oh no, some youtube keyboard warriors aren't happy. Oh, well, didums.
@OfficialJawdun I mean yeah, go and watch a science based show if you want long winded scientific answers to questions.
I am always a huge fan of Mr Cox. He gets a sweetest voice among human.
I love the point at which Brian Cox comes to terms with the fact he’s talking to an idiot and just says “yeah…. There’s a kranky planet”
@smullaney Nah, he wuz runnin his cawksukkah too much.
They're friends
Although points for quick thinking because he did make sense about strong gravity creating shorter lifeforms.
@@smullaney84 Ye but good lord looking at these shows nowadays kind of makes me cringe, it's such old humour, my rotting brain only understand vulgar humour or something completely stupid like a stock image of lettuce with dubstep.
So at this point I'm way more interested in the science than jokes.
What the hell is Ross doing? Completely ruined the entire interview. I had the same feeling watching this as I used to have in school when a stupid plonker classmate would act up and give the teacher a hard time when everyone else is trying to be polite and listen. Absolute cringefest, rude, disgusting behaviour
@Lipstick Nista Absolutely!! I can't remember the last time I watched anything on regular TV. Podcasts are my primary mode of entertainment now!!
Yep that's Ross in a nutshell. The classroom wanker.
Totally agree. Obviously this shitty show is all about him.
I use to think Jonathan Ross was amazing on the bbc when I was a kid now I realised how much of a idiot he is ! Back to podcasts for me 🤣
This is why the world is full of idiots. Most folk scoff at intelligent folk.
I appreciate JR has to get the occasional laugh to entertain the viewers but not every single sentence.
He used a clever and sincere guest like a comics fall guy.
Yeah this came across as being just cringy to watch. I felt sorry for the scientist.
Brain Cox is just so patient with this idiot. Great that he has a sense of humor
I call him the smiling scientist ❤️ we should all know these things but with him teaching makes me wanna learn more!!! He makes it real interesting because he’s very passionate about his work!!!
It's a shame he interrupted Brian every single time he saw an opportunity to do so.
I don't think many people wants to listen to his s*** anyway
These "scientists" might wanna look up and around the moon, amateurs watch crafts buzzing about and blowing stuff up on the moon for decades, but hey, NASA doesn't see anything and these parrots aren't payed to speak the truth.
BrianCox giving An Introduction to Physics lecture at Manchester Uni is so inspirational.
If I had been privy to it I would have taken a different career path.
Stop interrupting Jonathan, I’d like to hear Brian speak!!!
Could listen to Brian all day. Great voice and as was in bygone days, doesn't hide his accent
Every time Brian was getting to the meat of a potential discovery's implications, he got cut off with Jonathan's cretinous babble. So infuriating.
Surely if you wanted to hear Mr.Cox giving a serious lecture would you really watch a crap show like this,,the audience are in fits of laughter,shows you simple they are.I would say its all part of Brian Cox,s methology of getting people interested in science.
@@khutt19 No, but what I consider entertaining is a talk show host making the most of their guest. Why have someone like Brian on if that's not what you're going to do?
When brian says a billion years I believe him and I zoom to a young earth I recognize and I dont. I sort of time travel when I listen to him. Then when the video ends it’s back to reality. And it’s bitter sweet. So I’ll just watch more Brian cox and float mesmerized in incomprehensible vastness and infinity immeasurable…..
Brian asked what more do I want?
I want to live again.
I have never desired it as I do now.
I don't remember Jonathan Ross being so annoying towards guests like his American counterparts, especially the ones from the scientific community.
Absolutely. Sad when a grown adult feels the need to try to suck attention out of what could be an interesting occasion, due to the potential of that interesting occasion. Parasitic, in a way,
You to sad idiots obviously don’t know Jonathan Ross that well.. he’s just having abit of fun and messing about. The guests know what he’s about and whats gonna happen before they come on the show
You really haven’t watched much of Ross
Love Professor Brian Cox.
He is so HANDSOME and of course intelligent.💗
Does he even age?
The host is like that ADD student we all had in class that just can't take a second off.
i love hearing prof Cox speaking .....fascinating
Love love Brian Cox. I don't know much about J. Ross and now don't care to.
I would love to hear about astrophysics with Brian....ik Johnathan is trying to be funny but this are very precious informations that we need to know.
and that's why we were there to be the biggest dumb human beings to sabotage the knowledge of a great scientist, like always, blocking the right in every single sentence. What a dumb greatest idiot interviewer! He should be thrown out of this show like a peace of crap and send him to middle school where we can learn RESPECT.
The first 5 seconds were ok but then woss remembered to waste another good guest
A potentially edible comet because I know that’s the only thing you’re interested in. I didn’t realise Brian was able and willing to take the piss out of people. Nice one. 😊
You do know Brian was a literal rock star at one point in time right?!
I remember hearing about this discovery, I admire physics and Brian Cox
If the sensors did not detect any signal from other planets in which there are civilizations, this does not mean that there are no civilizations on other planets, perhaps there is something wrong with the sensors or the way they are trying to detect any signal coming from some planets, in the end it is impossible that we are the only ones in this galaxy
LOL HILARIOUS!! I was crying with laughter. LOVED the experiments and "trying to blow up the studio"!!
Brian Cox needs to reveal his skin care routine.
What do you care, Gianni... you bedded Marilyn Monroe 🤷♂️
Selling his soul.
Papaya extract.
JACKS face 2nd law thermodynamics hahaha amazing.
Brian Cox took that very very well, Being on a comedy show~
He wanted to say so much more but he didn't get mad or anything~ he just went with the flow as best as he could, Which is really cool!
I personally wanted to hear all he wanted to say but, I guess Jonathan Ross wasn't going to let that happen this time!
Nice presentation and experiment 😍🤩🙌
Let him speak ffs
One Sage said this 2500 years ago , read the scriptures. We are not alone but we will never reach those stars in our life time as the distances are phenomenal
So good, and for so many reasons!
A journey to the end of the universe anyone 😉
Ohhhhh Go on then
Yes please
Bro imagine your telling someone about one of the things your most interested in as is a part of your job and they be like “not interested”
Professor Brian Cox meets a Microbial brain on planet earth!
One of many! He is the ambassador for the forces that discourage independent thought to keep us hooked on cretinous nonsense.
😂
Who is far richer and more famous than cox 😂😂😂😂
@@Genevasplaytime He who appeals to other microbial brains.
Brian Cox makes physics interesting...
Funnily enough it was a subject I hated so much at school, that I refused to study it after a year. Although I swear I would have worked hard at it if Brian had been the teacher!
Perfect example of what Don't Look Up depicted between Leo and the tv show hosts....
What baffles me (correct me if I'm wrong) but if we find an Earth like planet that's millions of miles away by the time we can see it we would be looking at something in the past?
Yes, very weird/cool
Yes, if there is an earth like planet, which is inhabited and has a civiliaztion like ours which is several million light years away then we would be looking at their civilization several million years ago. The same applies with earth... if you where to travel several million light years away from our planet and looked back on it, you would see the dinosaurs since the light has yet to reach that far of a distance.
@@jooecarter love stuff like this
@@broggie123 Me too :)
@@jooecarter I would beg to differ.. you're not right about seeing dinosaurs..
Why have a scientist on if you don't want to listen and instead attention seek like a kid
He has many other videos to watch do nut
Simple microbial life began so early in world history I would suggest it was more likely than not. However the stability required to get to intelligent life may be far more infrequent.
Indeed. For complex life to originate on Earth we think that one microbe survived being "eaten" or engulfed by a larger microbe and that gave rise to the first eukaryotic cell, which is the building block on this planet of all intelligent life.
That common ancestor, or the chance encounter that sparked the path, is very special and possibly incredibly rare.
I do think the universe is teeming with life. I don't think we'll meet an intelligent species beyond our planet
Come ON. Even Brian's laughing. Ross is a very funny man.
Bryan cox and Neil degrasse Tyson are amazing minded humans ..
Brian Cox did a good job of navigating through this interview. He must have a lot of patience to deal with people like this host.
It would have been a better bit if Ross drank the nitrogen at the beginning.
Hmmm JR was not at his best in this one. Always love to hear what Brian Cox has to say.
Duno why some are so upset, I think Ross was doing what Ross does best. Keeping things light. Brian Cox has nothing to prove and is also clearly able to have a laugh at someone else's expense. He wasn't there to teach science, just went to have a chat with a funny guy.
I'm an enormous Brian Cox fan but Johnathon was just trying to do his job, add a bit of light heartedness. Didn't do a great job but there you go
I've always thought that a good fantasy story could be written about aliens who live on a slightly smaller planet than Earth, and so are larger and are are capable of slightly more impressive physical feats than on Earth.
With the added benefit of having some quality world building, due to having an entire planet, yet more enclosed than Earth.
@ Hareecio Nelson, The key world is enclosed, this is an enclosed system which is why you will never see anyone living on some imaginary planet. The satanic scum behind everything will kill most of the population off before any chance of exploring somewhere new, most of the ocean is not even explored.
@@faithismespeaks6848 what
Brian is like the substitute science teacher and Jonathan is the pain in the butt teenager. Love it! 😅
In junior school (late 80's) my class were tasked with creating an alien with a backstory. My alien had a scarf and girls - I was told off for not being imaginative!
I originally put a knee-jerk reaction dislike to this ..... just frustratingly annoyed at Ross's inane comments ..... I soon cooled down and changed it to a like ..... Prof Cox must have sooooooo much patience dealing with people like this.
Many of us also get a knee-jerk reaction to kick a "scientist/professional sceptic" in the teeth when you've got 30 people who had direct UFO and E.T. contact but folks like this guy explain to you that it had to be a gas bubble, a swarm of fireflies etc. These professional parrots can't see the forest from the tree.
@@4Everlast you also have 30 people who have seen Jesus and the flying spaghetti monster, and possibly cloud-shaped figures.
@@4Everlast You have literally no evidence and are just filled with bias because you want them to be true. Cox is a scientist, not someone who says things are true because he wants them to be, even with no evidence. The 'face on Mars' perfectly sums up you idiots, I bet you thought that was evidence of aliens and a government cover up - with proper evidence it's revealed to just be a rock.
UFO means UNIDENTIFIED flying object. Meaning it's not identified and no one knows what it is or has any evidence of it. Not once have these been proven to be aliens, but many, many, times they've been proven to be something insignificant such as a hot hair balloon, a bird, or a piece of debris.
@@Randy12346 Another sceptic that couldn't see and wouldn't admit to seeing a UFO if it landed up Uranus.
My physics teacher said he was at uni with Brian Cox, and whenever he mentioned it he'd get this look on his face which clearly said "and he's out there making tv shows, whilst I'm teaching 11-18 year olds. Where did it all go wrong"
Watching the bit where he took the jug of cream away and then put an end to it by pouring the liquid nitrogen into it... it was almost like the roles were reversed. Finally Brian Cox is teaching what appears to be kids
Yes!
Brian Cox is something straight out of an anime 🤓
🤣🤣
no..
Attack on Titans.
We want 'Alien' 🤣🤣
No rocks flying thru space LOL
this is an interview?!?!?!?!
"To prevent them from really thinking out anything themselves, we shall deflect their attention to amusements, games, pastimes, excitement, and people's palaces. Such interest will distract their minds completely from questions on which we might be obliged to struggle with them. Becoming less and less accustomed to independent thinking, people will express themselves in unison with us because we alone offer new lines of thought- of course through persons whom they do not consider as in any way connected with us."
Thirteenth Protocol of The Learned Elders of Zion.
“You are too good looking to be a professor” what does this suppose to me?! 😂😂😂😂
Ross is underestimating his viewers. He doesn't think they have the attention span to care about science. He's literally the TV hosts from Don't Look Up.
The tribe has spoken
Jonathan you are a legend, people are starving and this dude is talking about plantes we will never reach, joe you are a man of the people😂
This is just like a scene out of ‘don’t look up’
Keppler 22-B, that's the place for me. Wooo!
I can highly recommend the planet's audio book. It's on yt.
I thought American television was disrespectful against intellect, but man UK takes the cake.
Thought this was a scene from Don't Look Up
This was my EXACT THOUGHT PROCESS. What a joke
Great demonstration of humans with IQ level
Just like my Wife, I love Cox.
My internal monologue throughout this entire clip was literally nothing but "shut up Ross you insufferable oaf".
Same
Absolutely brilliant and Brian is gorgeous too Lov Arlene xxxxxxx
Pwofessor bwian cox!!
I like to do this fairly simple calculation: There are about 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the observable universe. If only one in 100,000,000 had a planet on which life was possible and there was life on only one in 100,000,000 of those, there would be 7,000,000 planets with life in the universe. You can vary the numbers of course, I think you can make the last two numbers smaller which would increase the number of planets with life on them, but when I see how big the number is with such a low probability I think it's arrogant to do so think that we are alone in the universe.
7:25 dude will get a darwin award
I love British science experiments. No wonder they invented everything.
JR is a fool, I mean just imagine having Prof. Cox in your presence and take the piss, we all lost out in this interview!
Baz.. if you read these comments... Carl Sagan said there are 100 billion stars in the milky way I've heard you say 200 billion.. I've just watched " how the universe works" and some bird said..... 400 billion. 😠 not a small difference. Do we know how many or not?
latest estimation is 400 billion
I get this is a talk show but when your guest is actually interesting and you keep interrupting with comments that just aren't funny it comes across as rude, not amusing at all.
Brian would
look great
in a 90’s
indie band
And in less than 3 minutes, the previously unquantifiable respect I had for Jonathan Ross as a host is now suddenly quantifiable: 0.
Clearly then, if it's not fashioned out of shiny things, makes loud noises upon stimulation and screaming bright colours, he hasn't the mental capacity to appraise.
Oh my gosh, that was soooooo cool with the experiment and the mixing and all that smoke at the end dahaha
I'm glad that everyone else here finds Ross to be an irritating cretin. I hope our comments get back to him.
Jonathan Ross is out of his depth in every respect. Unwatchable.
It's ITV. You know! Ant and Dec level of intellect. Watch BBC for Brian's and others work on Astronomy etc.
Johnathan not everybody is suitable for your flat jokes!
Nobody is, other than some lobotomised lunatic in Broadmoor Hospital! What a cringefest of examples of why we are not fit to be part of The Universe……yet.
Ross shows himself up here. He’s trying to be funny, but he often comes across like an overgrown annoying school kid. You can just tell that Cox just wants to have a decent conversation and inform, but is constantly undermined by Ross being plain daft.
He is doing it on purpose, you'd be surprised how little people care about the universe etc. He just knows what his audience is.
Pwfessa Brian cox this is my show wonanthon woss !!
Brian cox is not a comedian or a singer that came to chit chat and make jokes !
he is a god damn scientists !
he should be given the respect he deserves and he should be given the time to talk properly without someone interrupting or making fun of his words ! this is absolutely disgraceful !
Jonathan was a little bit disrespectful to what he was saying at times but I guess it's an entertainment show not a documentary
Perhaps not the most Serious demonstration by Mr Cox of course with Jonathan Ross acting the fool but very good fun.
This genius was on the wrong show, sadly!
It's not the first time that Jonathan has been really rude, the worst was a time that he "interviewed" Martin Clunes in 2010 on "Friday Night With Jonathan Ross" on the BBC.
I especially found this cringeworthy when he kept insisting Tom Daley should drink cream with the deliberate insinuation that came with it...
As a British person, how the hell are Brian Cox's teeth so perfect? That's what I am interested in! lol
Lol you got that right, the guys a genius
I am watching this after watching don't look up and I feel wired